The Sun produces approximately 9.555 ⋅ 10^38 ergs of radiant energy in 2.45 ⋅ 10^5 seconds. 10^-4 mm (0.00074 mm) is the more reasonable measurement for the distance between the tracks on a DVD.
Part A:
To calculate the amount of ergs of radiant energy the Sun produces in 2.45 ⋅ 10^5 seconds, we can multiply the rate of energy production (3.9 ⋅ 10^33 ergs/s) by the given time period:
Energy = (3.9 ⋅ 10^33 ergs/s) * (2.45 ⋅ 10^5 s).
Using the properties of exponents, we can multiply the coefficients and add the exponents:
Energy = 3.9 * 2.45 ⋅ 10^(33+5) ergs
= 9.555 ⋅ 10^38 ergs.
Therefore, the Sun produces approximately 9.555 ⋅ 10^38 ergs of radiant energy in 2.45 ⋅ 10^5 seconds.
Part B:
The more reasonable measurement of the distance between the tracks on a DVD would be 7.4 ⋅ 10^-4 mm (0.00074 mm) rather than 7.4 ⋅ 10^4 mm (74,000 mm).
A DVD track's width is typically around 0.6 μm (micrometers), which is equivalent to 0.0006 mm. Given that, 7.4 ⋅ 10^-4 mm (0.00074 mm) is within a reasonable range for the distance between tracks on a DVD.
On the other hand, 7.4 ⋅ 10^4 mm (74,000 mm) is much larger than the expected track width. A measurement of 74,000 mm would be highly unlikely and unrealistic for the distance between tracks on a DVD.
Therefore, 7.4 ⋅ 10^-4 mm (0.00074 mm) is the more reasonable measurement for the distance between the tracks on a DVD.
Learn more about radiant energy here
https://brainly.com/question/18414476
#SPJ11
If the sum of an infinite geometric series is \( \frac{15625}{24} \) and the common ratio is \( \frac{1}{25} \), determine the first term. Select one: a. 625 b. 3125 c. 25 d. 125
The first term of the infinite geometric series is 625.Let's dive deeper into the explanation.
We are given that the sum of the infinite geometric series is \(\( \frac{15625}{24} \)\)and the common ratio is\(\( \frac{1}{25} \).\)The formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series is \(\( S = \frac{a}{1 - r} \)\), where \( a \) is the first term and \( r \) is the common ratio.
Substituting the given values into the formula, we have \(\( \frac{15625}{24} = \frac{a}{1 - \frac{1}{25}} \).\)To find the value of \( a \), we need to isolate it on one side of the equation.
To do this, we can simplify the denominator on the right-hand side.\(\( 1 - \frac{1}{25} = \frac{25}{25} - \frac{1}{25} = \frac{24}{25} \).\)
Now, we have \(\( \frac{15625}{24} = \frac{a}{\frac{24}{25}} \).\) To divide by a fraction, we multiply by its reciprocal. So, we can rewrite the equation as \( \frac{15625}{24} \times\(\frac{25}{24} = a \).\)
Simplifying the right-hand side of the equation, we get \(\( \frac{625}{1} = a \).\)Therefore, the first term of the infinite geometric series is 625.
In conclusion, the first term of the given infinite geometric series is 625, which corresponds to option (a).
learn more about geometric series here here
https://brainly.com/question/30264021
#SPJ11
you want to have 90% confidence of estimating the proportion of office workers who respond to e-mail within - 0.05 an hour to within because you have not previously undertaken such a study, there is no information available from past data. determine the sample size needed.
Answer:Can you explain this better
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
A sample of 675 office workers would be needed to estimate the proportion of workers who respond to emails within 0.05 hours with 90% confidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine the sample size needed, we need to use the following formula:
n = (Z^2 * p * q) / E^2
Where:
n is the sample size needed
Z is the Z-score corresponding to the desired level of confidence (in this case, 90% confidence corresponds to a Z-score of 1.645)
p is the estimated proportion of office workers who respond to e-mail within the desired time frame (we don't have an estimate, so we will assume a conservative estimate of 0.5)
q is the complement of p (q = 1 - p)
E is the margin of error we want to achieve (in this case, 0.05)
Plugging in the values, we get:
n = (1.645^2 * 0.5 * 0.5) / 0.05^2
n = 674.52
Rounding up to the nearest whole number, we get a sample size of 675. Therefore, we would need to sample 675 office workers in order to estimate the proportion of workers who respond to e-mails within 0.05 hours with 90% confidence.
A car moving at a constant speed passed a timing device at t=0. After 8 seconds, the car has traveled 920 ft. Write a linear function rule to model the distance in feet d the car has traveled any number of seconds t after passing the timing device.
The linear equation of line is d = 115t , where d is the distance in feet and t is the time in seconds
What is an Equation of a line?The equation of a line is expressed as y = mx + b where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept
And y - y₁ = m ( x - x₁ )
y = y-coordinate of second point
y₁ = y-coordinate of point one
m = slope
x = x-coordinate of second point
x₁ = x-coordinate of point one
The slope m = ( y₂ - y₁ ) / ( x₂ - x₁ )
Given data ,
Let the distance traveled by the car be represented as d = 920 feet
Let the time taken by the car be represented as t
Now , the speed of the car will be the slope of the line
Now , when t = 0 , the value of d = 0
So , the first point is P ( 0 , 0 )
Let the second point be at t = 8 , Q ( 8 , 920 )
So , the slope m = ( y₂ - y₁ ) / ( x₂ - x₁ )
Substituting the values in the equation , we get
Slope m = ( 920 - 0 ) / ( 8 - 0 )
Slope m = 115
And , the equation of line is y - y₁ = m ( x - x₁ )
y = 115x
On simplifying the equation , we get
d = 115t be equation (1)
Hence , the equation is d = 115t
To learn more about equation of line click :
https://brainly.com/question/14200719
#SPJ1
Instructions
Sarah’s neighbor offers to pay her $5 for every shark tooth she finds on the beach. After collecting only three shark’s teeth, Sarah decides to share the opportunity with her friend John. Sarah can find shark teeth twice as fast as John, but she can earn even more money with his help.
Sarah can use the expression 5(2j + 3 + j) to represent the amount of money she can earn.
Part 1: Writing Expressions
Each partner completes Part 1 on his or her own.
Write an expression that looks like Sarah’s expression: 5(2j + 3 + j). Replace the coefficients so that your expression is not equivalent. You may use any number that you choose to replace the coefficients. Be sure to leave the variables the same. For example, 8(3j + 7 + 3j) looks like Sarah’s expression but is not equivalent.
Translate the algebraic expression you created in Question 1 to a verbal expression.
Swap! Send your algebraic expression from Question 1 to your partner.
Part 2: Writing Equivalent Expressions
Collaborate with your partner and complete this Part 2 together.
Choose and use two mathematical properties (the commutative property, combining like terms, or the distributive property) to create one equivalent algebraic expression for the expression your partner sent to you. Explain how you arrived at the equivalent expression by showing all your steps and stating which properties you used.
Swap! Send the equivalent algebraic expression and mathematical proof back to your partner.
Pick a number from 1 to 10. Use that number to verify the two expressions (the original and the one from your partner from Question 3) are equivalent by substituting it into both expressions. Show all your work for complete credit.
Part 3: Finish the Story
Each partner completes Part 3 on his or her own.
Write a few sentences to end Sarah’s story. How many shark teeth did Sarah find? How many shark teeth did John find? How much money did Sarah earn?
Sarah found three shark teeth and decided to share the opportunity with her friend John. She can find shark teeth twice as fast as John and can earn even more money with his help.
Sarah can earn $5 for every shark tooth she finds on the beach. She can use the expression 5(2j + 3 + j) to represent the amount of money she can earn.
Part 1:
Sarah's expression is 5(2j + 3 + j). If we replace the coefficients with 4, the expression becomes 4(2j + 3 + j), which is not equivalent to Sarah's expression.
The algebraic expression we created is 4(2j + 3 + j), which translates to "Sarah can earn $4 for every shark tooth she finds on the beach, and she can find shark teeth twice as fast as John."
Part 2:
We can use the distributive property to create an equivalent algebraic expression for the expression our partner sent us. Let's assume our partner sent us the expression 3(4j + 2 + 2j).
Step 1: Distribute the coefficient 3 to the terms inside the parentheses.
3(4j) + 3(2) + 3(2j)
Step 2: Combine like terms.
12j + 6 + 6j
Step 3: Rearrange the terms.
18j + 6
The equivalent algebraic expression is 18j + 6, and we used the distributive property to arrive at this expression.
Part 3:
Sarah found three shark teeth, and John found 1.5 shark teeth. Since Sarah can find shark teeth twice as fast as John, she earned $45 (9 shark teeth x $5 per shark tooth), and John earned $22.50 (4.5 shark teeth x $5 per shark tooth). In total, Sarah earned $67.50.
Thus, Sarah found three shark teeth and decided to share the opportunity with her friend John. She can find shark teeth twice as fast as John and can earn even more money with his help.
To know more about algebraic expression, click here
https://brainly.com/question/28884894
#SPJ11
in a multiple regression, the following sample regression equation is obtained: yˆ = 157 12.7x1 2.7x2. a. predict y if x1 equals 15 and x2 equals 33. (round your answer to 1 decimal place.)
The predicted value of y is 436.6 when x1 equals 15 and x2 equals 33 in this multiple regression model.
To predict y using the given sample regression equation, you need to plug in the given values of x1 and x2 into the equation and then solve for y.
1. Write down the sample regression equation: yˆ = 157 + 12.7x1 - 2.7x2
To predict y when x1 equals 15 and x2 equals 33, we plug those values into the sample regression equation:
yˆ = 157 + 12.7(15) + 2.7(33)
yˆ = 157 + 190.5 + 89.1
yˆ = 436.6
2. Substitute the given values of x1 (15) and x2 (33) into the equation:
yˆ = 157 + 12.7(15) - 2.7(33)
3. Calculate the values within the parentheses:
yˆ = 157 + 190.5 - 89.1
4. Perform the addition and subtraction:
yˆ = 436.6
So, when x1 equals 15 and x2 equals 33, the predicted value of y (rounded to one decimal place) is 258.4.
Learn more about Regression:
brainly.com/question/31735997
#SPJ11
PLSSSS HELP IF YOU TURLY IF YOU TURLY KNOW THISS
Answer: yes I will help you the answer is 10
Step-by-step explanation:
you do 9 times X = 9x then do 9 x -8 = -72 then do 18 + 72 = 90 then do 9x/9 = 90/9 then 90/9 = 10 so then 10 is your answer
i need to solve question E using factoring and showing work, i have no idea how
As shown in the graph above, the point G is in the interior of the right angled triangle. Angle ABG measures (x^2 + 3x) while angle CBG measures 40x.
Angles ABG and CBG add up to 90 and that gives you;
\(\begin{gathered} x^2+3x+40=90 \\ x^2+43x-90=0 \\ \text{Factorize and you have} \\ (x+45)(x-2)=0 \\ \text{This means } \\ x+45=0 \\ x=-45 \\ OR \\ x-2=0 \\ x=2 \end{gathered}\)Knowing that we are dealing with a positive angle measure, we shall take x = 2 (and not x = -45)
Therefore, x = 2, and angle ABG measures
\(\begin{gathered} x^2+3x \\ 2^2+3(2) \\ 4+6 \\ 10 \end{gathered}\)Also angle CBG measures;
\(\begin{gathered} 40x \\ 40(2) \\ 80 \end{gathered}\)
Write an equation that could be used to find the retail price for each range. How do you know the equation will work consistently for each range?
Answer:
It looks like you are trying to find the retail price for a given quantity of pairs. To write an equation that could be used to find the retail price for each range of quantities, you will need to know the following information:
The retail price for the first range (0-20 pairs)
The retail price for the second range (21-40 pairs)
The retail price for the third range (41-60 pairs)
The retail price for the fourth range (61-80 pairs)
The retail price for the fifth range (81 or more pairs)
Once you have this information, you can use an if-then statement to create an equation that will work consistently for each range. The equation might look something like this:
if (quantity >= 0 and quantity <= 20):
retail_price = price for 0-20 pairs
elif (quantity >= 21 and quantity <= 40):
retail_price = price for 21-40 pairs
elif (quantity >= 41 and quantity <= 60):
retail_price = price for 41-60 pairs
elif (quantity >= 61 and quantity <= 80):
retail_price = price for 61-80 pairs
else:
retail_price = price for 81 or more pairs
This equation will work consistently for each range because it uses a series of conditions to determine which retail price to use based on the quantity of pairs.
EDIT:
To find the retail price for a given quantity of pairs based on the wholesale prices you provided, you can use the following equation:
if (quantity >= 0 and quantity <= 20):
retail_price = 25.00
elif (quantity >= 21 and quantity <= 40):
retail_price = 23.00
elif (quantity >= 41 and quantity <= 60):
retail_price = 21.00
elif (quantity >= 61 and quantity <= 80):
retail_price = 19.00
else:
retail_price = 17.00
This equation will work consistently for each range because it uses a series of conditions to determine the retail price based on the quantity of pairs. The retail price will be 25.00 for quantities in the first range (0-20 pairs), 23.00 for quantities in the second range (21-40 pairs), 21.00 for quantities in the third range (41-60 pairs), 19.00 for quantities in the fourth range (61-80 pairs), and 17.00 for quantities in the fifth range (81 or more pairs).
Step-by-step explanation:
To design a new advertising campaign, Ford Motor Company would like to estimate the proportion of drivers of the new Ford Fusion that are women. In a random sample of 91 Fusion owners, 49 of them were women. What is the 99% confidence interval estimating the proportion of all drivers who are women?1) ( 0.41689 , 0.66003 )2) ( 0.40385 , 0.67307 )3) ( -0.40385 , 0.67307 )4) ( 0.32693 , 0.59615 )5) ( 0.4862 , 0.59072 )
The 99% confidence interval estimating the proportion of all Ford Fusion drivers who are women is (0.40685, 0.67007). The closest option to this interval is option 2) (0.40385, 0.67307).
The answer is option 1) (0.41689, 0.66003). To design a new advertising campaign, Ford Motor Company conducted a sample survey of 91 Fusion owners and found that 49 of them were women. To estimate the proportion of all drivers who are women, a confidence interval is calculated. The formula for calculating the confidence interval is:
sample proportion ± z*(standard error)
where z is the critical value for the desired confidence level and the standard error is calculated as:
sqrt((sample proportion*(1 - sample proportion))/sample size)
For a 99% confidence interval, the critical value is 2.576. Plugging in the values from the sample, we get:
sample proportion = 49/91 = 0.5385
sample size = 91
Using the formula above, we can calculate the standard error as:
sqrt((0.5385*(1 - 0.5385))/91) = 0.0625
Finally, we can plug in the values into the confidence interval formula:
0.5385 ± 2.576*0.0625
which gives us the interval (0.41689, 0.66003). Therefore, option 1) is the correct answer.
Learn more about Confidence Intervals:
brainly.com/question/24131141
#SPJ11
what is the equation of the line?
Answer:
y=x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y=x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is the first one since y is -2
the acute angles of a right triangle are ______?
A(complementary
B(congruent
C(unique
D(supplementary
C(a linear pair
Answer:
A) Complementary, is your answer.
A hardware store buys 300 feet of nylon rope. The store sells the rope by the inch. A customer can purchase 40 inches of the rope for $1.60. The store sells all of the rope and makes a profit of 54.00. How much did the store pay for the rope in dollars per inch?
The amount of money paid for the rope in dollars per inch is 0.025 $/in.
How to determine the amount of money paid for the rope in dollars per inch?Based on the information provided above, we can logically deduce that the store bought 300 feet of nylon rope.
Conversion:
1 feet = 12 inches.
300 feet × 12 inches/feet = 3600 inches.
Therefore, we now know that this store bought 3600 inches of nylon rope.
Furthermore, this store sold 40 inches of nylon rope for $1.60. Thus, we can calculate the selling unit price of nylon rope in dollars per inch as follows;
Selling unit price = $1.60/(40 in.)
Selling unit price = $0.04/in.
At a price of $0.04 per inch, we have:
Selling Price =3600 inches × $0.04/in.
Selling Price = $144
Therefore, since the profit was $54 for selling all of the nylon rope;
Cost price = Selling price - profit
Cost price = $144 - $54
Cost price = $90
The cost in dollars per inch is given by;
Cost in dollars per inch = ($90)/(3600 in.)
Cost in dollars per inch = 0.025 $/in.
Read more on rope and dollars per inch here: https://brainly.com/question/12896452
#SPJ1
[(8 x 10-3) x (0.0002)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
0.0154, I think, I apologize if this is wrong.
Jackiehas 7dresses, 4hats, and 8pairs of shoes. She will choose an outfit that has one dress, one hat, and one pair of shoes. How many different outfits are possible?
A telegraph pole stands on a line joining two points P and Q on the ground.
The telegraph pole is 9 m tall. The angle of depression of the top of the pole to point P
is 4°. The angle of depression of the top of the pole to point Q is 7º. What is the
horizontal distance between P and Q.
Step-by-step explanation:
let's call the top of the pole T, and the ground point of the pole G.
so, the situation gives us 2 right-angled triangles:
PTG and QTB.
from both triangles we know one leg (TG, the pole = 9 m), the inner angles at G (90° in both cases), and actually the inner angles at T, because we know the angles of depression there.
the inner triangle angles at T are just the complementary angles of the angles of depression (that means they add up together to 90°).
the inner angle at PTG = 90 - 4 = 86°
the inner angle at QTG = 90 - 7 = 83°
and because the sum of all angles in a triangle is always 180°, we even know the third angles at P and Q :
angle P = 180 - 90 - 86 = 4°
angle Q = 180 - 90 - 83 = 7°
yes, they are the same as the angles of depression (must be the same).
so, we know from both triangles 1 side and all 3 angles.
with the law of sine we can get every missing side.
particularly we need the second legs (sides in the ground) to get the distance between both points.
a/sin(A) = b/sin(B) = c/sin(C)
a, b, c being the sides always opposite of their related angles.
TG/sin(4) = PG/sin(86)
PG = 9×sin(86)/sin(4) = 128.7059963... m
TG/sin(7) = QG/sin(83)
QG = 9×sin(83)/sin(7) = 73.29911785... m
the distance between P and Q can have now 2 solutions :
if P and Q are on different sides of the pole, then
PQ = 128.7059963... + 73.29911785... = 202.0051142... m
but if they are on the same side of the pole, then their distance is
PQ = 128.7059963... - 73.29911785... = 55.40687846... m
due to the phrasing of the first sentence I suspect the first solution to be right.
but just in case, I gave you also the second possible solution.
Find the last digit of 17 to the power 17
We know that the cyclicity power (a^n) of 17 is 4.
Divide 4 then replace to a new number The number is as follows:-The number is a remainder.\(\sf \longmapsto\bigg( \dfrac{17}{4}\bigg) = 1\)
Solving Further\(\sf \longmapsto17^{(17/4)}\)
\(\sf \longmapsto17 {}^{} \)
\(\sf \longmapsto7(last \: digit )\)
The height of three Russian dolls are in the ratio 7:12:17.
Rewrite this as an equivalent ratio of tye form 1:m:n.
Give any decimal in your answer in 2 d.p
Rewriting the ratio as an equivalent ratio of 1 : m ; n is 1 : 12/7 : 17/7
Rewriting the ratio as an equivalent ratioFrom the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:
The height of three Russian dolls are in the ratio 7:12:17.
So, we have
Ratio = 7:12:17
The form is given as 1:m:n.
So, we divide through the ratio by 7
So, we have
Ratio = 1 : 12/7 : 17/7
Hence, the equivalent form is 1 : 12/7 : 17/7
Read more about ratio at
https://brainly.com/question/12024093
#SPJ1
(2,2), (4, 2), (5, 2), (2, 2), (6, 2)
What is the range of the filling function?
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
range is your y value and you don't keep typing the same number when u are looking for your domain and range
what the metric system of measurement is based on the number?
The metric system of measurement is based on the number 10.
This system is also known as the International System of Units (SI) and is used in most countries around the world. In the metric system, various units of measurement are defined as multiples or fractions of a base unit, which is defined for each quantity being measured. For example, the base unit for length is the meter, and the base unit for mass is the kilogram. Prefixes such as kilo-, centi-, and milli- are used to indicate multiples or fractions of the base unit, based on factors of 10. For example, a kilometer is 1000 meters, a centimeter is 1/100 of a meter, and a milligram is 1/1000 of a gram. This makes the metric system easy to use and convert between units, as well as consistent and universally recognized.
To learn more about the metric system, refer:-
https://brainly.com/question/29953513
#SPJ4
The sides of a triangular field are in the ratio of 5:6: 7. If its perimeter is 3600 m, find the area of that land.
Answer:
587877.5383m^2
Step-by-step explanation:
First off, we need to find the 3 sides of the triangle. To do this, we need to know that all the sides add up to 3600m. So 5 + 6 + 7 = 3600m. Since we don't know what 5, 6 and 7 are, we have to find out what is 1 worth. So adding them all up equals to 18, so 18 = 3600m. To find 1, simply divide 3600m by 18 which = 200m. Now to find all the sides, multiply each side by 200.
5*200 = 1000m
6*200 = 1200m
7*200 = 1400m
Then to find the area, we will need to use the formula 1/2abSinC.
However to do this, we need an angle. So to find that angle we will use the cosine rule A = cos-1(b^2 + c^2 -a^2/2bc). This will lead to A = 44.4153086º.
Then we can use the area formula to find the area of the land. This will give an area of 587877.5383m which you can round up to whichever extent you want. I have attached a photo with the working out for everything.
Here is a linear equation: y = 2/3x + 1 Are (6, 5) and (9, 8) solutions to the equation? Explain or show your reasoning.
how many unique lines exist in the projective how many unique lines exist in the projective geometric space in z3
The projective geometry in Z3 is a mathematical concept that involves extending the Euclidean geometry over a finite field with three elements, denoted as Z3. In projective geometry, parallel lines intersect at a point at infinity, which allows for a more complete and consistent geometric system than Euclidean geometry.
In Z3, there are three points and three lines passing through each pair of distinct points. Therefore, the total number of lines in the projective geometry in Z3 is nine. These nine lines are:
The line passing through the first two pointsThe line passing through the first and third pointsThe line passing through the second and third pointsThe line passing through the first point and the point at infinity in the direction of the second pointThe line passing through the second point and the point at infinity in the direction of the first pointThe line passing through the first point and the point at infinity in the direction of the third pointThe line passing through the third point and the point at infinity in the direction of the first pointThe line passing through the second point and the point at infinity in the direction of the third pointThe line passing through the third point and the point at infinity in the direction of the second pointEach of these nine lines is unique and distinct in the projective geometry in Z3.
For more details about Euclidean click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13104788#
#SPJ11
Helen and Stephen both simplify the exponential expression 4 ln21 3 e −
Stephen makes the mistake in the expression as he uses the 4 in the root and the 3 in the power and the expression actually is: ∛(16)/e
How to illustrate the information?We start with the expression:
exp( (4/3)*ln(2) - 1)
Here we can use that:
exp(ln(x)) = x.
and e^(a + b) = e^a*e^b.
the first step here is:
e^((4/3)*ln(2) - 1) = e^((4/3)*ln(2)*e^(-1)
So the first step of Stephen is correct, but the first step of Helen is not, you can not simplify the expression in that way.
now, we have that:
a*ln(x) = ln(x^a)
then we can write:
(4/3)*ln(2) = ln(2^(4/3))
and e^(ln(2^(4/3)) = 2^(4/3)
then we have:
e^((4/3)*ln(2)*e^(-1) = 2^(4/3)/e
now we can write this as:
∛(2^4)/e
Here is where Stephen makes the mistake, he uses the 4 in the root and the 3 in the power.
The expression actually is: ∛(16)/e
Learn more about expressions on:
https://brainly.com/question/723406
#SPJ1
Please help me out here! Precalc :))
Domain are the x values where the line starts and stops.
A bracket is used for a solid circle and a parentheses is used for open circles
The answer would be the second choice: (1,2)
a garden is to be laid out in a rectangular area and protected by a chicken wire fence. what is the largest possible area of the garden if only 100 running feet of chicken wire is available for the fence? round your answer to the nearest tenth, and use correct units.
Rounding to the nearest tenth, the largest possible area of the garden is 625 square feet.
What is area of rectangle?
The area of a rectangle is a measure of the region enclosed by its four sides. It represents the amount of space or surface covered by the rectangle. The formula to calculate the area of a rectangle is:
Area = Length × Width
To find the largest possible area of the garden given a limited amount of chicken wire fence, we need to determine the dimensions of the rectangular garden that would maximize its area.
Let's assume the length of the rectangular garden is L and the width is W. The perimeter of the garden, which is the length of the chicken wire fence required, can be expressed as:
Perimeter = 2L + 2W
Given that the perimeter is 100 running feet, we have:
2L + 2W = 100
Simplifying the equation, we get:
L + W = 50
To maximize the area, we need to maximize the product of the length and width, which represents the area of the garden:
Area = L * W
We can rewrite the equation for the area in terms of one variable using the constraint L + W = 50:
Area = (50 - W) * W
To find the maximum area, we can take the derivative of the area equation with respect to W, set it equal to zero, and solve for W:
d(Area)/dW = 50 - 2W = 0
2W = 50
W = 25
Substituting the value of W back into the equation L + W = 50:
L + 25 = 50
L = 25
Therefore, the largest possible area of the garden is obtained when the length and width are both 25 feet. The maximum area is:
Area = L * W = 25 * 25 = 625 square feet.
Rounding to the nearest tenth, the largest possible area of the garden is 625 square feet.
To learn more about area visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25292087
#SPJ4
PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!
There are 24 children at the skate park. Seven of them are on bikes, nine of them are on skateboards, and the rest are on inline skates (4 wheels per skate). How many wheels are at the skate park?
a. 24
b. 96
c. 114
d. 8
Answer:
C. 114
Step-by-step explanation:
bikes have 2 wheels
skateboards have 4 wheels
incline skates have 8 wheels in total
7*2 = 14
9*4 = 36
8*8 = 64
if you add all of these up you get 114 wheels in total. 8*8 was from 24-7-9 = 8
Please simplify this expression.
1 + 4.25n + 32p – 3 + (–2p) + 54n
Answer:
58.25n+30p-2
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the expression as;
1 + 4.25n + 32p – 3 + (–2p) + 54n
collect like terms
1-3+4.25n+54n+32p-2p
-2+58.25n+30p
58.25n+30p-2
I have copied one brainly user's answer, sorry for that...
However, hope it helps you!!!
square root of 400 pl solve fast
Answer:
20
Step-by-step explanation:
\(20^{2} = 400\)
\(\sqrt{400} = 20\)
Answer: The square root of 400 is 20.
Step-by-step explanation:
The square root of a number is the value that, when multiplied by itself, gives the original number. To find the square root of 400, you can use the long division method or an electronic calculator.
Alternatively, you can approximate the square root of 400 by finding the nearest perfect square (a number whose square root is a whole number). In this case, the perfect squares closest to 400 are 361 and 441. Since the square root of 361 is 19 and the square root of 441 is 21, you can estimate that the square root of 400 is between 19 and 21. Since 20 is halfway between 19 and 21, you can approximate the square root of 400 to be 20.
suppose you take the small prism and stack it on top of the larger prism. what will be the volume of the composite figure?
A ladder reaches 6 m up a wall with its foot 2·4 m from the wall. A person standing under the ladder at a point 80 cm from its foot would be able to touch the ladder at a height of _____ m from the ground.
Hey there! I'm happy to help!
We see that the ladder reaches a height of 6m from the ground while being 2.4 m from the wall. The ratio of the height to the length from the wall is 6:2.4 which can actually just simplify to 2.5 because 6m to is 2.4*2.5.
This person is 80 cm from the ladder's base. We just saw that you can take the distance from the wall (in this case, our wall is the human as the human is touching the height) and multiply it by 2.5 to find the height of the ladder at that specific point. So let's do that.
80*2.5= 200
We are looking for meters though. Since there are 100 centimeters in a meter, this is just going to be 2 meters.
Have a wonderful day! :D