1/5 and 1/6 - High Risk Stops
Under which circumstances would an officer initiate a high risk (felony) vehicle stop? (What would the officer need to know BEFORE even
stopping the vehicle)?
Answers
Answer:
Some circumstances can include:
- Car coming back stolen.
- Armed/violent suspect in the vehicle.
What the officer should know is mostly information about the car. It's license plate, tags, car make and model and color of the car, and how many passengers are within it. A lot of stuff in short.
Hopes this helps.
Related Questions
Summarize the Torress v. Texas Department of Public Safety Supreme Court case.
Answers
Answer:
Texas Department of Public Safety. In Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety, the Supreme Court considered whether the states, by ratifying the Constitution, gave Congress the power to authorize suits against states using its constitutional war powers.
Explanation:
Describe the role of federal courts in checking the power of the legislative branch.
Answers
If you are stopped by a police officer for driving
all passengers under the age of 18 properly restrained, you can
receive a citation and a fine of.
plus additional court
costs.
$30
$40
$50
$60
Answers
Answer:
60 u believe
Explanation:
if im wrong let me know
How it Works
A Losing party files a petition for a writ of certiorari with a higher court. The petition is a formal request for the higher court to review the lower court judgment against the party petitioning. The petition must include the names of all parties in the case, as well as the facts and legal questions of the case and an argument as to why the higher court ought to agree to hear the case.
If the higher court agrees to hear the case, known as granting cert, it issues a writ of certiorari to the lower court. The writ requires the lower court to provide the higher court with a physical copy of the entire record compiled during the course of the case, from the initial filing of a complaint all the way through the final judgment issued by the lower court. Once the higher court has the record, it reviews it for errors made by the court to answer the questions presented in the petition. Additionally, the higher court sets a date for the parties to present the case for review.
If the appellate court does not want to take the case, it will deny the petition. This is usually acknowledged as "cert. denied". Certiorari review is always discretionary. Further, Rule 10 of the U.S. Supreme Court's rules states that it will only grant a petition for cert. if there are "compelling reasons." The writ is usually granted only when there are important questions of law that need to be addressed; it is rarely used when the petition alleges errors in the findings of fact.
Answer: First, a state court case goes to ____________. If that case is appealed, it goes to ________________. Another way to get the Supreme Court to hear a case is _______________________.
Using the Ballotpedia overview of the writ of certiorari above, explain how a case that starts in a state court can work its way to the Supreme Court.
Answers
First, a state cοurt case gοes tο Trial cοurt. If that case is appealed, it gοes tο the intermediate appellate cοurt in the state.
Anοther way tο get the Supreme Cοurt tο hear a case is By filing a petitiοn fοr a writ οf certiοrari.
What dοes Trial Cοurt mean?A trial cοurt, alsο knοwn as a cοurt οf first instance, is a cοurt οf law where cases are initially heard and decided. It is the first level οf the cοurt system where a case is heard and facts are presented. Trial cοurts have the authοrity tο determine the facts οf a case, apply the law tο thοse facts, and make a judgment οr ruling οn the matter.
In the United States, trial cοurts are typically οrganized by jurisdictiοn and handle bοth civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, trial cοurts may hear a wide range οf disputes, including cοntract disputes, persοnal injury claims, and family law matters, such as divοrce and child custοdy. In criminal cases, trial cοurts hear cases where individuals are accused οf cοmmitting a crime and determine whether the defendant is guilty οr nοt guilty.
Learn more about trial courts
brainly.com/question/30390265
#SPJ1
List 10 of your daily activities (for example, waking up, eating, and going to school). Next to
each item, list any laws that affect that activity.
Answers
Answer:
Every single activity of our lives are governed by a set of laws, often called rules and regulations.Explanation:
Every single activity of our lives are governed by a set of laws, often called rules and regulations. It binds us to act and perform our activities in the most appropriate and safe manner.
Going to the park - Public Decency Law.Driving - Traffic Law.Going for shopping - Civil Law.Reaching school on time - School norms and regulations.Working in a job - Labor laws.Taking public transportation - Civil Law.Parking the car - Traffic Law.Doing homework and school assignments - School norms and regulations.Throwing garbage and wastes - Municipal and community law.Using internet and social media - Cyber Law.The 10 of my daily activities include simple activities like waking up and going to do my job while driving my car and usage of computer systems and internet in the office.
The laws that affect the daily activities done by me are as mentioned below. It is to be noted that certain laws may be repeated due to the nature of such activity.
Activity #1- Using apartments elevators- Housing society laws.Activity #2- Driving the car to reach office- Traffic rule and regulations.Activity #3- Parking the car in Proper parking zone- Traffic rules.Activity #4- Listening to licensed music albums- Intellectual properties Act.Activity #5- Surfing the internet - Cyber securities law.Activity #6- Walking on road- Constitution Act (Freedom of movement)Activity #7- Doing Banking transactions- Banking Regulation Act.Activity #8- Living with my Hindu wife- Hindu Succession Act.Activity #9- Making business deals for my partnership firm- LLP Act.Activity #10- Trading in share and securities- Securities and Exchange regulations.
Hence, the correct set of rules and regulations that are followed by me on a regular basis are as the ones aforementioned.
To know more about rules and laws, click the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/3980297
Which of the following is NOT considered circumstantial evidence?
O fibers
O eye witness reports
O tool marks
O soil
O DNA
Answers
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?
Answers
I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.
Who is a Defendant?This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.
It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.
Read more about Defendant here https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
What issues does article 1 of the constitution deal with
Answers
1. Section 1: Legislative Powers: This section vests all legislative powers of the federal government in Congress, comprising the House of Representatives and the Senate.
2. Section 2: House of Representatives: This section defines the qualifications and responsibilities of members of the House of Representatives, including the process of election, the apportionment of representatives based on population, and the authority to initiate revenue-related bills.
3. Section 3: The Senate: This section outlines the qualifications and responsibilities of senators, including the process of election and the equal representation of states in the Senate.
4. Section 4: Elections and Meetings: This section grants the states the power to establish the times, places, and manner of congressional elections, while also requiring Congress to meet at least once a year.
5. Section 5: Rules and Procedures: This section grants each chamber of Congress the power to determine its rules, procedures, and discipline for its members.
6. Section 6: Compensation and Privileges: This section establishes the compensation and privileges of members of Congress, including protection from arrest while attending sessions and freedom of speech.
7. Section 7: Legislative Process: This section outlines the process for passing bills into law, including the requirement of bicameral approval and the presidential veto power.
8. Section 8: Powers of Congress: This section enumerates the specific powers of Congress, including the power to collect taxes, regulate commerce, coin money, establish post offices, declare war, and make laws necessary and proper for carrying out its responsibilities.
9. Section 9: Limits on Congress: This section imposes certain limitations on the powers of Congress, such as prohibiting the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the enactment of ex post facto laws.
10. Section 10: Limits on States: This section outlines the restrictions placed on the states, including their ability to enter into treaties, coin money, or engage in war without the consent of Congress.
Overall, Article 1 establishes the structure and authority of the legislative branch, defining its powers, responsibilities, and limitations within the framework of the U.S. government.
Answer:
Article I describes the design of the legislative branch of US Government -- the Congress. Important ideas include the separation of powers between branches of government (checks and balances), the election of Senators and Representatives, the process by which laws are made, and the powers that Congress has.
i don't need help but why do you need to pay for pemium
Answers
Answer:because the people are greedy and want more money they cant just help lol
Explanation:
Medical Forensics: what is a good American serial killer that I can write 5-7 pages on?
Answers
Answer:
I would suggest looking into some of the most well-known and studied cases, such as Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy, or the Green River Killer (Gary Ridgway). These cases have been extensively covered in books, documentaries, and other media, and there is a wealth of information available on their backgrounds, crimes, and investigations.
Explanation:
Find and read an article, from a good source, pertaining to local, state, or national government. Clip out or print the article. the event must be between October-now
You will write 2 paragraphs that are at least five authentic sentences.
Paragraph 1 - a summary of the article - think who, what, when, why, where, how -
Paragraph 2 - connection to content, government, communities/ make predictions/ identify ripple effects
Answers
We can see here that an article from Premium Times reveals that the House of Representatives has ordered the CBN Governor to suspend the restriction on withdrawal of currency. This order came after the Central Bank released a recent policy that limits citizens from withdrawing over a certain limit.
This recent policy of the Central Bank is seen to be a way to achieve the cashless policy which the Federal Government is clamoring for. The restrictions on withdrawal limits has been seen as a bad idea at this moment. Some members of the House stated that it will affect communities that are unbanked.
What is an article?An article is actually known to be a piece of writing that is written by a writer in order to share ideas and information with the public or with a specified audience.
We see here that the above information is taken from Premium Times. The article was written about seven days. It gives latest information about the recent CBN withdrawal policy.
Learn more about article on https://brainly.com/question/26859358
#SPJ1
5 scarves 2 of them are green if he chooses 1 scarf at random what is the probabillity its green write your answer as a fraction and a decimal
Answers
The total is 5 and then green ones are 2, so your fraction would be 2/5. Divide 2 and 5 to get .4.
Hope this helps
how many jurors must agree in order to reach a verdict
Answers
Answer:
In a civil case, the judge will tell you how many jurors must agree in order to reach a verdict. In a criminal case, the unanimous agreement of all 12 jurors is required.
Explanation:
yes
In a short paragraph, define mercenaries and Private Military Companies (PMC). Summarize today's use of mercenaries and Private Military Companies.
Answers
Answer:
Mercenary / Private Military Companies (PMCs)
The term mercenary is applied to a variety of historical situations which do not appear to have elements in common. Casca, the eternal mercenary, pulled the duty of nailing Christ to the Cross and was doomed to spend eternity as a soldier, a career that can lead to billets like sitting on five-gallon water cans in the cold desert wind on Christmas Eve in Saudi Arabia.
The recruitment and use of mercenaries is legally defined in international law, in the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, as well as the 1989 International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries, to which Ukraine is a party. The criteria for a mercenary are taking part directly in hostilities, motivated primarily by the desire for private gain, being paid substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar ranks and functions in the armed forces of the party to the conflict, and not being a national of the party to the conflict or a resident of the territory controlled by a party to the conflict. The recruitment and use of mercenaries is prohibited by international law.
With regard to foreign fighters, there is no internationally agreed legal definition of foreign fighters, nor a specific regime governing them. A foreign fighter is generally understood to refer to individuals who leave their country of origin or habitual residence and become involved in violence as part of an insurgency or non-State armed group in an armed conflict. Foreign fighters are motivated by a range of factors, notably ideology, but can also be attracted fight for financial reward. Foreign fighters are obliged to respect applicable rules of international human rights and humanitarian law during armed conflicts.
In Deccember 1989 the UN General Assembly adopted the "International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries", which noted that "the recruitment, use, financing and training of mercenaries should be considered as offences of grave concern to all States and that any person committing any of these offences should either be prosecuted or extradited..." This convention defined a mercenary, as a person, who among other attributes "Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and functions in the armed forces of that party..."
Please describe a scenario that provides an argument for the explanation of criminal behavior in American Society.
You must pick a specific crime (personal or property) and list the factors which contributed to an individual's behavior. In
your explanation, utilize the elements for the theoretical components of Classical (Free will) vs. the Positivist School
(Biological Determinism and the Somatotype School) in Criminology.
Feel free to use your imagination of the crime, but be attentive to address the elements which support your choice of
Biology (DNA) over Environment (Sociological, Psychological, or Physiological (Body or Brain trauma)factors as listed
above. (Remember to use the media presentations and your text as references prior to submitting your response!)
Answers
This is a bit of a long one sooo get ready for the ride
Hope this helps a bit
Answer:
Crime: Aggravated assault
Scenario: John, a 25-year-old man, was arrested and charged with aggravated assault after he attacked a stranger in a park. The victim suffered from several injuries, including a broken nose and a concussion. John has no prior criminal history and is currently unemployed.
Classical (Free will) theory: According to the classical theory of criminology, criminal behavior is a result of individuals making a rational choice to commit a crime. In John's case, his decision to assault the stranger in the park can be attributed to his own free will. Perhaps he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or he may have felt provoked or threatened by the victim. However, according to this theory, John is ultimately responsible for his own actions.
Positivist (Biological determinism) theory: The positivist theory of criminology posits that criminal behavior is influenced by biological, psychological, or social factors. One example of a biological factor is genetics. Studies have shown that there may be a genetic component to aggressive behavior, which could contribute to John's assault of the stranger. Additionally, brain injuries and other physical traumas have also been linked to violent behavior. In John's case, it is possible that he may have suffered from a brain injury or other physical condition that contributed to his violent outburst.
Somatotype (Body type) theory: The somatotype theory of criminology suggests that individuals with certain body types are more prone to criminal behavior. For example, individuals with a mesomorphic body type (muscular and athletic) are more likely to engage in violent or aggressive behavior. In John's case, it is possible that he has a mesomorphic body type, which may have contributed to his physical strength and ability to inflict harm on the victim.
References:
"Criminology: The Essentials" by Anthony Walsh and Cody Jorgensen (2018)
"The Genetic Basis of Aggressive Behavior: An Overview" by Laura Almasy and John Blangero (2001)
"Physical Trauma and Crime" by Mark S. Umbreit and Carolyn Boyes-Watson (2006)
"The Somatotype Theory of Sheldon" by Kevin M. Beaver and J.C. Barnes (2013)
"Brain Trauma and Violent Behavior" by H.S. Levin and A.R. Dronkers (1993)
"Drugs, Alcohol, and Crime: A Correlation Analysis" by Lindsey R. Blumell and Bruce C. Smith (2014)
what’s the purpose of a police department?
Answers
Answer:
Partnership with the community to enforce the law, preserve peace, protect the people, reduce fear, and maintain order.
Deploy law enforcement resources in the most efficient and effective manner.
Prevent and solve the crime and prosecute offenders. Recover and return stolen property to the owner.
Which statement best summarizes the central idea of this expert
Answers
Answer:
it is A
Explanation:
Why is military justice entirely separate from civilian courts? What is your opinion on this separation, is it necessary?
Answers
Answer:
Civilian courts hear appeals and process them through circuit courts and up to federal courts. Individual branches of the military handle appeals in the military justice system. For example, the Army has the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, and the Marines have the Marine Court of Criminal Appeals.
brainliest?
What is the only situation where you can safely push a pedal with your left foot?
A. if the driver has a cramp in their right foot
B. if the car is an electric vehicle
C. if the car has a clutch
D. if the roads are icy
Answers
Answer:
im going with A
Explanation:
Left-foot braking has long been one of the most hotly contested topics in driving. Detractors claim it makes no difference at best, and is a horrible and dangerous practice at worst. However, you can stop 70ft faster in an emergency situation if you use your left foot properly (more on that number in a second).
The only situation when the individual can safely push a pedal with their left foot is if the driver has a cramp in his right foot.
One of the most contentious aspects of driving has long been left-foot braking. Detractors argue that it makes no difference at best and that at worst, it is a horrible and dangerous practice. In an emergency, however, if you use your left foot properly, you can stop 70 feet faster.
Therefore the correct option is A.
To know more about the situation when an individual can push the pedal with the left foot, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/546440
For each of the following situations, decide what privacy rights or interests are in conflict and what arguments can be made for each side. Indicate whether you agree of disagree with the law or policy and explain why or why not.
a. The government requires taxpayers to reveal the source of their income, even if it is from illegal activities.
b. In a prison that has had several stabbings, inmates are s***-searched every day.
c. A state law requires motorcyclists to wear helmets.
d. The police place a small device in a phone that enables them to record all numbers dialed on that phone.
e. A hospital requires an emergency room patient to list all medications she is taking before treating her.
Answers
The conflicts that are discussed have been given in the spaces below
What are the conflicts herea. Conflict: Privacy vs. Public Interest. Arguments: Privacy - Individuals have a right to privacy and should not be forced to incriminate themselves. Public Interest - The government has a legitimate interest in collecting taxes and enforcing the law. Agree or Disagree: Disagree, as the government has a legitimate interest in enforcing the law and collecting taxes.
b. Conflict: Privacy vs. Security. Arguments: Privacy - Inmates have a right to privacy and should not be subject to unreasonable searches. Security - The prison has a duty to maintain a safe environment for both inmates and staff. Agree or Disagree: Agree, as maintaining security is a legitimate concern in a prison setting.
c. Conflict: Personal Freedom vs. Public Safety. Arguments: Personal Freedom - Individuals have a right to make their own decisions about risk and safety. Public Safety - The state has a duty to protect citizens and reduce the risk of harm. Agree or Disagree: Agree, as helmet laws have been shown to reduce the risk of injury and death in motorcycle accidents.
d. Conflict: Privacy vs. Law Enforcement. Arguments: Privacy - Individuals have a right to privacy and should not be subject to warrantless searches. Law Enforcement - The police have a duty to investigate crimes and protect public safety. Agree or Disagree: Disagree, as the police need to be able to use investigative tools to solve crimes and protect public safety.
e. Conflict: Medical Privacy vs. Medical Treatment. Arguments: Medical Privacy - Patients have a right to privacy and should not be forced to disclose sensitive information. Medical Treatment - Hospitals have a duty to provide safe and effective medical care, which may require knowledge of a patient's medications. Agree or Disagree: Agree, as disclosure of medications is necessary for proper medical treatment, but should be handled with sensitivity and confidentiality.
Read more on conflict here:
https://brainly.com/question/26083560
#SPJ1
What is prop 26 and How would you vote on it?
Answers
Answer: Proposition 26 would legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California. The ballot measure would define sports bettings wagering on the results of professional, college, or amateur sport and athletic events, with the exception of high school …
Explanation: personally i would vote yes because i like sports and sport betting
what is the answer to chicken
Answers
my explanation is yes
Answer:Chicken....soup.. yummy in my stomach. idoit U-U
Explanation:
s
t
o
m
a
c
h
Y
u
m
Explain, in simple terms, the Idaho constitution’s amendment vi.
Answers
The Idaho Constitution's Amendment VI tells that the people who are accused of a crime have the right of a quick public trial by an impartial jury.
In Idaho Constitution's Amendment VI, the accused also has the right to be informed of the charges against them, to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and to have a lawyer represent them.
This amendment also prohibits trying someone twice for the same crime, and protects against self-incrimination. In summary, this amendment protects the rights of people who are accused of a crime and ensures they have a fair trial.
Learn more about Constitution's Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29775576
#SPJ1
How do avidar’s values and approaches to humans resources management support Lob’s business success?
Answers
Avidar's values and approaches to human resources management play a significant role in supporting Lob's business success. Here's how our Employee Engagement and Satisfaction, Talent Acquisition and Development, Diversity, and Inclusion, and Performance Management
1. Employee Engagement and Satisfaction: Avidar focuses on creating a positive work environment where employees feel engaged, valued, and satisfied. By promoting a culture of employee well-being and work-life balance, Avidar enhances employee morale, productivity, and retention. Engaged and satisfied employees are more likely to contribute their best efforts to the company's success, leading to improved business outcomes for Lob.
2. Talent Acquisition and Development: Avidar recognizes the importance of attracting and retaining top talent. They employ effective recruitment strategies to bring in skilled individuals who align with Lob's goals and values. Avidar also prioritizes employee development through training programs, mentorship, and career progression opportunities. By investing in their employees' growth and professional advancement, Avidar ensures a highly skilled and motivated workforce that contributes to Lob's success.
3. Diversity and Inclusion: Avidar embraces diversity and inclusion as integral components of its human resources approach. They foster an inclusive workplace where individuals from diverse backgrounds feel respected, valued, and empowered. This approach cultivates a rich pool of perspectives, ideas, and experiences within Lob, driving innovation, creativity, and adaptability, which are crucial for business success in a rapidly changing market.
4. Performance Management: Avidar implements effective performance management practices to align individual goals with Lob's objectives. They provide regular feedback, set clear expectations, and recognize and reward employees' achievements. This approach promotes accountability, encourages high performance, and helps drive the overall success of Lob.
By upholding these values and employing these approaches, Avidar creates a strong foundation for Lob's human resources management. It leads to a motivated, skilled, and diverse workforce that is engaged, productive, and aligned with the company's vision and goals, ultimately contributing to Lob's business success.
Know more about Human resources management here:
https://brainly.com/question/14419086
#SPJ8
The Case of ...
also stays
The Burglar
Who Was Bitten
The Kings own a small store in a crime-ridden
section of town. They have been the victims of
break-ins in the past. To protect their family
and store, they purchase a guard dog. The
dog is trained to attack on command. The dog
in the store from 11 P.M. to 7 AM,
while the store is closed. One night, a person
breaks into the store and is attacked by the
dog. The police catch the person, and he is
convicted of burglary. After the judge gives
him a suspended sentence, the burglar sues
the Kings for the injuries caused by the guard
dog. Can someone write two cross questions for the burglar. I’m defending him.
Answers
Answer:
no body was bitten and there was a kitten
the buglar saw a kitten and he by a dog to get bitten
but the king get bitten and there was a their is sitten
Controlled intersections use some form of which of the
following:
Circular arrows
All of the answers are correct
Flashing signal lights
Signal lights
Answers
following:
Circular arrows
All of the answers are correct
Flashing signal lights
Signal lights
Answer: All of the above
Help please would mean a lot
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation: B because they can detonate easily when subjected to heat and friction.
s
Question 13
The new redesigned UCR is called the
A. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics
ms
B. Offender-Based Trasaction Statistics
C. National Criminal Victimization Survey
O D. National Incident-Based Reporting System
Answers
Answer:
D. National Incident-Based Reporting System.
Explanation:
The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) is a program of the federal government of the United States of America that was launched in 1929.
The main purpose of the UCR is to gather and compile informations on crimes that were committed and reported to the law enforcement agencies in the United States of America.
Generally, the federal bureau of intelligence (FBI) are saddled with the responsibility of publishing these crime statistics reports in the United States of America.
This ultimately implies that, the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) measures the most serious crimes in the United States of America, also referred to as Part I crimes.
The new redesigned Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) is called the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). It took a five (5) year redesign effort to transform the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) program into the more comprehensive and well-detailed National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).
what your favorite food says about you
Answers
Answer:
says more about who you are as a person
Answer:
my favorite food is pasta
Explanation:
Which private security professional, also called a bodyguard, usually works for celebrities?
guards usually provide services to celebrities and famous personalities.
Answers
Answer:
Celebrity
Explanation: