A country with a flexible exchange rate determines the value of its currency
based on:
O
A. the supply and demand for the currency in global markets.
B. the amount of international trade it plans to do in a year.
C. a formula tied to the value of another country's currency.
o
o
D. a prediction for the level of inflation the currency will experience.

Answer:

because that if there were no law there would be Robers all in the world

Answer:

Fair use

Explanation:

pls mark me as brainlest pls

In the context of the situation of the context that has been provided above, it is to be stated that the prosecutor must prove that Bruce accessed a computer without an authorization. Therefore, the option A holds true.

A prosecutor is the person who has been given the responsibility of acting in either defense or proving the guilt of the plaintiff or the defendant. Moreover, the prosecutor must be putting his points in the direct interest of his or her client. This also includes to prove that his client had an unauthorized access to the computer.

Learn more about a prosecutor here:

https://brainly.com/question/12057544

#SPJ4

Answer: C - An agreement to buy a house

Explanation:

Security incident indicators that deserve aspecial attention administrators include when the system unexpectedly crashes without clear reasons and when new user accounts are mysteriously created which bypass standard procedures.

A Security incident indicators refers to indicator that signifies that a security has been compromised or have been in process of being compromised.

In conclusion, the Security incident indicators that deserve  aspecial attention administrators include when the system unexpectedly crashes without clear reasons and when new user accounts are mysteriously created which bypass standard procedures.

Read more about Security incident indicators

brainly.com/question/25164014

According to the question,The fourth term of the series is ar³ and the fifth term of the series is ar⁴.

ar³ = ar⁴ - 576 ----(1)

The second term of the series is ar and the first term of the series is a.

We have two equations (1) and (2) in two unknowns ar³ and ar.

Substituting the value of ar from equation (2) in equation (1), we get

(a + 99)r³ = (ar + 99)r² - 576r³ar³ - 99r³ 

= ar² r - 99r² r - 576r³ ar³ + 99ar² r

= 576r³ar³(99r² - 99r + ar²)

= 576r³

Since r > 0,99r² - 99r + ar² = 576r² ----(3)

Substituting the value of ar from equation (2) in equation (3), we get

99r² - 99r + (ar - 99)² 

= 576r²99r² + (a² - 198r + 9801) - 99r - 576r² 

= 0a² - 576r² - 99a + 99r + 9801

= 0

Substituting the value of ar from equation (2), we get

99r² - 99r + (99 + 576r - 99)² 

= 576r²99r² + 576²r² - 99r - 576²r² + 99r - 99² 

= 0r² = 99²/576

= 17/3a

= 99/(r - 1)

Substituting the values of a and r in the sequence, we get

The first term, a = 99/(r - 1) = 11

The second term, ar = 11 × 17/3 = 187

The third term, ar² = 187 × 17/3 = 3161/3

The fourth term, ar³ = 3161/3 × 17/3 = 53729/27

The fifth term, ar⁴ = 53729/27 × 17/3 = 913321/243

Sum of the first five terms of the sequence,

S5 = a + ar + ar² + ar³ + ar⁴S5 

= 11 + 187 + 3161/3 + 53729/27 + 913321/243S5 

= 4555.11 (rounded off to two decimal places)

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

Answer:

Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial

When a seller such as Acme, Inc. sells a good, they may be required to pay a tax to the government on each unit sold. This tax is typically a percentage of the sale price of the good.

The amount that Acme, Inc. receives after paying the tax to the government would depend on the sale price of the good, the tax rate, and any other costs associated with producing and selling the good. In order to calculate the amount Acme, Inc. receives after paying the tax, one would need to know these specific details.

To know more about tax visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12611692

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Miranda Rights do not apply because they are not being detained neither arrested.

Explanation:

The officer doesn't have to read them their rights because they are not being arrested or detained they have a right to leave while the officer is questioning them. So since the officer only suspects he cant charge them with anything.

Answer:

A. Specialized agencies that regulate the economy and are not directly controlled by the president

Explanation:

An independent executive agency refers to a type of agency created by the US Congress using a legislative Act (statutes), so as to operate as a regulatory and service agency setting standards and overseeing the functions of the federal government.

This ultimately implies that, independent executive agencies refers to specialized agencies that regulate the economy and are not directly controlled by the president. Thus, they established to exist outside the Executive Office of the President and the federal executive departments

Some examples of independent executive agencies are Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Election Assistance Commission (EAC), Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Federal Election Commission (FEC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), etc.

Explanation:

The law is important for a society for it serves as a norm of conduct for citizens. It was also made to provide for proper guidelines and order upon the behaviour for all citizens and to sustain the equity on the three branches of the government. It keeps the society running. Without law there would be chaos and it would be survival of the fittest and everyman for himself. Not an ideal lifestyle for most part.

The law is important because it acts as a guideline as to what is accepted in society. Without it there would be conflicts between social groups and communities. It is pivotal that we follow them. The law allows for easy adoption to changes that occur in the society.

Answer:

One of the major innovations that the American Founders brought to constitutional thought was their conception of a constitution as a written, fundamental law the supreme “law of the land” that defines the organization of government and serves as the ruling principle for the proper exercise of power by legislators

Explanation:

The trial stage of the juvenile court process involves the presentation of evidence, examination of witnesses, and a determination of the juvenile's guilt or innocence.

During the trial stage, the prosecution and defense present their respective cases in front of a judge or sometimes a jury. Evidence is presented, witnesses are questioned, and legal arguments are made to establish whether the juvenile is responsible for the alleged offense. The judge or jury then evaluates the evidence and makes a decision regarding guilt or innocence. If found guilty, the court proceeds to the disposition stage, where appropriate consequences or interventions are determined for the juvenile.

The trial stage in the juvenile court process serves as a pivotal moment where the evidence is examined, and a decision is made regarding the juvenile's culpability. It is an essential step in the legal process to ensure fairness and justice for juveniles involved in criminal cases.

To know more about juvenile court click here:

https://brainly.com/question/7579071

#SPJ11

Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution lists the specific powers granted to Congress. These include the power to tax, borrow money, regulate commerce, coin money, establish post offices, raise and support armies, maintain a navy, make rules for the government and regulation of land and naval forces, and other specific powers.

The Constitution also includes the Necessary and Proper Clause, which gives Congress the power "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof."

This clause grants Congress the power to pass laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out its specific powers listed in Article 1, Section 8.

Additionally, the 10th Amendment states that any powers not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited to it by the Constitution, are reserved to the states or to the people. This means that any powers not listed in Article 1, Section 8 are retained by the states or the people, not by Congress.

To know more about 10th Amendment  click below:

https://brainly.com/question/30103751#

#SPJ11

Kant's Retributivist theory of punishment is a philosophical theory that believes in the idea that punishment should be imposed on a person who commits a crime, as a way of ensuring justice. According to this theory, punishment is not meant to deter or rehabilitate the offender, but rather to serve as retribution for the harm they caused.

In Kant's view, punishment should be proportional to the crime committed, and should be imposed on the offender regardless of the potential consequences or benefits of the punishment. This is in contrast to other theories of punishment, such as utilitarianism, which focuses on the potential benefits of punishment, such as deterring future crime or rehabilitating the offender.

It is based on the idea that individuals have moral responsibility for their actions, and that punishment is a way of holding them accountable for their wrongdoing. It is also based on the principle of respect for persons, which holds that individuals should be treated as ends in themselves, and not simply as means to an end.

Overall, Kant's Retributivist theory of punishment is a deontological theory, which means that it is based on the idea that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their consequences.

For more such questions on Kant's theory.

https://brainly.com/question/4608993

#SPJ11

Answer:

ok good for him

Explanation:

The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.

Read more about court case here;

https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.

According to the Constitution, apportionment and redistricting must occur every: ten years.

This process is mandated by Article 1, Section 2 of the United States Constitution and is conducted to ensure fair representation in the House of Representatives.

Apportionment is the process of allocating the 435 seats in the House of Representatives among the 50 states based on population. This occurs after the decennial census, which is conducted every ten years, as required by Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution.

The census provides updated population data, which is used to determine the number of representatives each state will have for the next decade.

Redistricting is the process of redrawing the boundaries of the congressional districts within each state. This is done to accommodate changes in population and to maintain roughly equal representation for all citizens.

Each state legislature is responsible for conducting redistricting in their respective states, following the guidelines set forth by the Constitution and federal law.

In summary, the Constitution mandates that apportionment and redistricting occur every ten years, using the decennial census data to ensure fair and equal representation in the House of Representatives.

To know more about Constitution, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28807839#

#SPJ11

A conditional can be true even if it’s consequent is false

True or False?

Anticipatory Repudiation is the term for the action of a party to a contract who notifies the other party that he or she will not perform his or her duty under a contract.

Legally, one birthday party's failure to meet any of its contractual obligations is called a "breach" of the agreement. Relying on the specifics, a breach can occur when a party fails to carry out on time, does not perform in accordance with the terms of the settlement, or does now not carry out in any respect.

Events to the settlement can are seeking special types of remedies in court with a view to mitigating losses stemming from the breach, together with damages (financial repayment) and equitable treatments inclusive of unique overall performance (forcing the breaching party to observe via its obligations).

Learn more about contracts here https://brainly.com/question/984979

#SPJ4

Answer:

Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself

Explanation:

Empathy and understanding are the areas that an officers trauma would be an asset to the department

An officer's personal trauma can be an asset to a department in several ways:

Empathy and understanding: If an officer has experienced trauma themselves, they may be better able to understand and relate to victims of trauma in their work.

Communication skills: Personal trauma can also improve an officer's ability to communicate with people who have experienced similar traumatic events.

Problem-solving skills: Officers who have faced personal trauma may have developed creative and innovative coping mechanisms that they can apply in their work.

Resilience: Officers who have faced personal trauma and have overcome it may be better equipped to handle difficult situations in their work.

Cultural sensitivity: If an officer's personal trauma is related to a particular community, they may have a deeper understanding of that community's culture, history, and experiences, which can enhance their ability to work effectively with that group.

Read more on trauma here: https://brainly.com/question/13097273

#SPJ1

Answer: 5 is Federal
6. Federalism
10. Is Concurrent powers
12. Is Army and Navy
13. Is The Constitution

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), the US Supreme Court ruled that students who had been disciplined for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War were entitled to collect monetary damages from the school district because their constitutional rights had been violated.

No, leaving a personal item under a seat at a movie theater does not constitute a bailment.

Bailment refers to a legal relationship where one party (bailor) transfers possession of personal property to another party (bailee) for a specific purpose or benefit. It involves the temporary control and responsibility of the bailee over the bailor's property.

In a bailment, the bailee is obligated to exercise reasonable care and return the property to the bailor once the purpose of the bailment is fulfilled.

However, in the given scenario, Larry's act of leaving his hat behind does not establish the necessary elements of intent and agreement required for a bailment to exist.

Learn more about Bailment here:

https://brainly.com/question/32606890

#SPJ4

ANSWER:

the activities associated with the governance of a country or other area, especially the debate or conflict among individuals or parties having or hoping to achieve power.