The decline in criminal activities with age is known as the age-crime curve.
The age-crime curve refers to the observed pattern where criminal activities tend to decrease as individuals age. This phenomenon has been widely studied in criminology and is supported by empirical evidence.
The age-crime curve typically shows a peak in criminal involvement during late adolescence or early adulthood, followed by a gradual decline in criminal activities as individuals enter their 20s and beyond. There are various factors that contribute to this decline, including changes in social roles, increased responsibilities, maturation, and a reduction in opportunities for criminal behavior.
Additionally, factors such as increased self-control, improved decision-making skills, and the potential for desistance from criminal activities also play a role in the age-crime curve. Understanding the age-crime curve helps inform policies and interventions aimed at reducing criminal behavior and promoting positive development across the lifespan.
The complete question is:
The decline in criminal activities with age is known as ________.
To know more about desistance, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/7329198
#SPJ11
Laws of conservation of mass
Answer:
mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations.
Explanation:
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Answer:According to "https://courses.lumenlearning.com/" "The law of conservation of mass states that mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations"
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>
- Zack Slocum
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
the ensuring patient access and effective drug enforcement act
The Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act is a bill that was signed into law in 2016 by President Barack Obama. This law aims to strike a balance between providing patients with access to necessary medications while also preventing drug abuse and diversion by increasing the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) powers.
The act outlines several changes to current drug control policies, including the following: -
Clarification of the DEA's authority: The law provides clarity to the DEA's authority to issue immediate suspension orders (ISOs) and revocations of registration to practitioners who dispense controlled substances.
- Support for collaboration between DEA and healthcare providers: The law directs the DEA to collaborate with healthcare providers to educate them on their responsibilities for controlled substance prescribing and dispensing.
- Risk-based assessment of controlled substances: The law directs the DEA to use a risk-based approach to assessing the need for and quantity of controlled substances to be manufactured, based on factors such as past abuse, diversion, and public health needs.
- Enhanced communication: The law requires the DEA to communicate with registrants before issuing ISOs or revocations to provide them with an opportunity to respond to allegations.
- Increased transparency: The law requires the DEA to provide greater transparency regarding its administrative process for revocation of registration and to make available certain data related to controlled substances.
Overall, the Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act is intended to improve drug control policies and protect public health while also ensuring that patients have access to the medications they need.
To know more about Drug Enforcement Administration visit-
brainly.com/question/4948647
#SPJ11
In your own words, describe why it’s critical to always have auto insurance. Provide at least two examples of situations where you might need insurance.
Auto Insurance is always necessary for auto driver as well as his passengers.
Life Insurance, car Insurance, health insurance etc. are needed insurance for everyone .
Auto insurance is very important for drivers and it is madintory for everyone in every states. benefits of auto insurance are
Auto insurance helps passengers :health and personal injury insurance can help pay for medical expenses if you are injured in an accident. It also helps in recovering passenger costs due to accidents. This coverage helps pay for hospital visits, medical expenses, and surgery.
Auto insurance helps protect yourself.Liability insurance is required by law, but many people drive without it. Uninsured Motorist Insurance helps pay for medical bills if you are run over by an uninsured driver. This coverage is mandatory in some states and optional in others.
Adequate auto insurance coverage does more than meet legal requirements. Auto insurance helps protect your car, wallet and even equipment.
personally everyone needed some basic insurance policies which are following:
Life insuranceCar insurancehealth insuranceTo learn more about insurance , refer :
https://brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ4
Daily Food Safety Logs should be kept in the restaurant
US - no more than six months; Canada - no less than 6 months per provincial regulations
US - not less than 7 days, no more than 14 days; Canada - no less than 3 months per provincial regulations
US - no more than one day; Canada - no more than 1 month per provincial regulations
US - not less than one month; Canada - no more than 6 months per provincial regulations
Keep clean, separate raw and cooked food, cook thoroughly—these are the five easy rules for ensuring safe and healthful meals.
What is Food Safety Logs ?The bare minimum duration for holding foods is four hours. If food is reached after 4 hours of storage or serving, it must be reheated to prevent bacteria from affecting it.
When creating HACCP plans that achieve the stated objective, seven fundamental concepts are used. These guidelines cover risk analysis, CCP identification, setting critical limits, monitoring protocols, corrective actions, verification techniques, record-keeping, and documentation.
Learn more about Food Safety Logs here
https://brainly.com/question/29616916
#SPJ1
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Write a 3-5 sentence essay answering the following question.
Two cops stop you while walking down the street because you ‘match the description’ of someone who committed a crime nearby. You haven't, but they proceed to question and accuse you, saying they're going to bring you in. What do you do?
Answer:
Say you don't want to speak till you get a lawyer. That they are wrong you are gonna sue them for wrongful prosuction. Then when you get your lawyer state you alibia and how your not guilty.
Explanation:
Answer:
Hold on a sec I got it
Complete the following sentence.
The diverse roles of eligibility interviewers require these professionals to be knowledgeable, compassionate,
and___.
Answer:
Knowledgeable, compassionate, and responsible
Explanation:
Answer: diligent
Explanation:
i went through the notes
A growing number of law enforcement dispatchers and officers on the street believe that the 10-code system has outlived its usefulness. Compose a convincing argument that either supports this contention and offers an alternative form of communication shorthand that appropriately addresses contemporary calls for law enforcement response, or argue that the 10-code remains viable and useful in police communication but would benefit from some modernization; also provide examples of how you would modernize the code. You should answer this question using a minimum of 300 words.
Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code
Explanation:
I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad answer lol
The Writing Requirement: Jason Novell, doing business as Novell Associates,
hired Barbara Meade to work for him. The parties orally agreed on the terms of
employment, including payment of a share of the company's income to Meade,
but they did not put anything in writing. Two years later, Meade quit. Novell then
told Meade that she was entitled to $9,602 - 25% of the difference between the
accounts receivable and the accounts payable as of Meade's last day of work.
Meade disagreed, and demanded more than $63,500 - 25% of the revenue from
all invoices, less the cost of materials and outside processing, for each of the years
that she had worked for Novell. Meade filed a lawsuit against Novell for breach of
contract.
Discuss whether or not there is an enforceable contract (including a discussion on
the Statute of Frauds and any exception -if any - that may apply).
Regarding Barbara Meade's employment with Novell Associates, it is necessary to take into account the enforceability of the oral agreement between Jason Novell and Meade, especially in light of the Statute of Frauds.
A legal concept known as the Statute of Frauds mandates that some transactions must be in writing in order to be enforceable. But the Statute of Frauds has several exceptions that could apply in particular circumstances.
Contracts for the rendering of services are not covered by the Statute of Frauds. As a result, an oral employment contract, like the one between Novell and Meade, may be binding even in the absence of a written agreement.
Learn more about the Statute of Fraud, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30409098
#SPJ1
what type of insurance policy covers the employer from financial loss if the employee who handles money is dishonest?
The type of insurance policy that covers the employer from financial loss if an employee who handles money is dishonest is called "employee dishonesty insurance" or "fidelity bond".
A fidelity bond is a type of insurance policy that provides protection to employers against financial losses caused by the dishonest or fraudulent actions of their employees. The policy typically covers losses resulting from theft, embezzlement, forgery, and other forms of fraud committed by employees while performing their duties.
Fidelity bonds are designed to provide financial security to employers who are at risk of suffering significant financial losses due to the actions of dishonest employees. They are commonly used by companies that handle large sums of money, such as banks, financial institutions, and government agencies. The coverage provided by a fidelity bond can vary depending on the specific policy and the needs of the employer.
To learn more about Fidelity bond visit here:
brainly.com/question/13661265
#SPJ4
Phân tích các quan điểm cơ bản về nguồn gốc ra đời của nhà nước và pháp luật
Answer:
Remember that : means the less then sign I had to put because there is no less then sign
Prove your answer
Find the solution set for x write the inequality and represent it on a number line
-2(x+3) : 14+2x
Sam and Chris were friends and went to the bar together. Both of them had two glasses of wine (Merlot). Sam was small and weighed 170 lbs. while Chris was a bigger guy weighing in at 275lbs. Chris always wanted to buy Sam’s 2019 Harley Davidson motorcycle but Sam always told him that it wasn’t for sale. Chris had his concealed weapon on him at the bar and gestured toward the weapon. Chris stood up and told Sam to seriously reconsider whether his motorcycle was for sale while consistently showing the imprint of his weapon against his jeans. Sam thought Chris was armed with a gun and immediately told Chris that his motorcycle was now for sale. Chris demanded a sale price of only $3,000 and Sam sold the motorcycle.
The following day, Sam went to see his lawyer to discuss whether the sale of his motorcycle was valid. Specifically, he mentioned to his lawyer that he two glasses of wine and couldn’t remember all of the details of the event. In addition, he told his lawyer that he felt pressured by Chris to sell his motorcycle and wasn’t sure whether he was armed.
The sale of motorcycle was not valid as Sam was not in a state of forming a proper consent for the agreement due to intoxication and he was also coerced into selling it because of fear of weapon.
About Consent
Whenever one person voluntarily accepts another's request or wish, this is known as consent. It is a term that is used frequently and has precise definitions in a variety of contexts, including the law, medicine, science, or intimate relationships. Consent may not mean the same thing when used in certain settings. For instance, a person who is mentally ill, has a poor mental capacity, or is younger than the age of consent to se-xual activity may voluntarily participate in such a s-ex encounter that yet falls short of the legal standard for consent as specified by the relevant law.
To know more about consent:
brainly.com/question/29220731
#SPJ1
Can someone help me with this asap!!
Answer:
1 and 5
Explanation:
Among the six children tested, Child 1 and Child 5 are the fraternal twins that are born to Mr. & Mrs. Jones. :)
Assuming two degrees of freedom, which of the following is the correct interpretation of the chi-square analysis, using a p-value of 0.05
The null hypothesis should be rejected because the critical value is less than the calculated Value correct interpretation of the chi square analysis using a p value of 0.05
A chi-square test is defined as a statistically significant difference between the expected and observed frequencies.
The chi-square test uses hypothetical facts to determine significant differences between calculated and observed frequencies.
The null hypothesis is rejected because the squared value is less than the first found statistic or calculated value. Therefore the hypothesis is invalid.
To learn more about ‘null hypothesis’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28920252
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
A researcher observed that when two heterozygous plants with red flowers are crossed the resulting offspring include plants with red white or pink flower. The researcher proposes the null hypothesis that flower color is the result of independent assortment and incomplete dominance. The researcher calculates a chi square value of 7.3. Assuming two degrees of freedom which of the following is the correct interpretation of the chi square analysis using a p value of 0.05?
If a producer has been convicted of a crime, he or she must notify the Commissioner within
A. 30 days.
B. 10 days.
C. 15 days.
D. 20 days.
Under the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a broadcast station licensee or permittee must notify the FCC within 30 days after the conviction of any of its officers, directors, or employees for any felony or misdemeanor involving a violation of federal or state law relating to gambling, bribery, extortion, or other similar misconduct.
This requirement applies to producers who work for broadcast stations. The purpose of this notification requirement is to enable the FCC to assess whether the convicted individual's continued involvement with the station would be in the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Failure to comply with this requirement can result in fines or other penalties. It is important for broadcasters to maintain compliance with FCC rules and regulations in order to avoid potential legal and financial consequences that could negatively impact their operations and reputation.
Learn more about Federal Communications here:
https://brainly.com/question/32223123
#SPJ11
Read this excerpt from the text about the borrowing power of Congress."Congress has put a statutory ceiling on the public debt, however. The public debt is all of the money borrowed by the Federal Government over the years and not yet repaid, plus the accumulated interest on that money. That legal ceiling has never amounted to much more than a political gesture, however. Congress regularly raises the limit whenever the debt threatens to overtake it. The public debt is approximately $16 trillion." What is the BEST explanation of the debt ceiling?
On the one hand, it is a legislative institution and makes policies for the entire nation. Senators are elected to represent all of the people in a state, whereas representatives are elected by the voters of a particular area.
In this capacity, all members are expected to put aside their personal ambitions and perhaps even the concerns of their constituents. Implied powers are political powers granted to the United States government that are not explicitly stated in the Constitution. They are supposed to be granted because similar powers have set a precedent. These implied powers are necessary for the functioning of any given governing body. The Indian National Congress also split into two different groups called Moderates and Radicals because the Moderates wanted to go against the British peacefully but the Radicals wanted to go against the British violently.
To learn more about legislative institution please click on below link.
https://brainly.com/question/29812215
#SPJ4
LOOK AT THE PICTURE ATTACHED!!
Answer:
40%9:14pm
Which of the following is correct?
Merry buys stocks for $3,000 and sells them
a year and a half later for $7,000.
Merry has to pay short-term capital
gains taxes on $3,000.
Merry has to pay long-term capital
gains taxes on $4,000.
Merry has to pay long-term capital
gains taxes on $7,000.
CLOSE
What is superficial equity failing to build
to take time to build equity-centered knowledge and fluency, leading to behavioral shifts without understanding deeper meaning or historical context
A group unhappy with the draft distributes a memo to members encouraging physical confrontations with draft agents. The leaders of the group are promptly arrested. Which of the following Supreme Court cases best justifies the actions taken by law enforcement in this scenario?
A. Schneck v. US
B. Wisconson v. Yoder
C. Mapp v. OH
D. Brandenburg v. OH
State v. Damms
7. What if Damms knew the gun was unloaded? Should he still be guilty of attempted murder? Explain your answer.
Any attempted murder will most likely be guilty before the law whether the pointed gun is knowingly loaded or not.
What is the case of State v. Damms?The court rule that since the handgun was empty and unknown by the the assailant who constituted some extraneous factor, this is enough conviction of attempted murder.
Also, majority of opinion hold that a person that points an unloaded gun (pistol) at someone knowing it to be unloaded and pulls the trigger will be found guilty of an attempt to commit murder.
Read more about attempted murder
brainly.com/question/9574503
#SPJ1
Chế độ thai sản trong luật
1. Lao động nữ sinh con được nghỉ việc hưởng chế độ thai sản trước và sau khi sinh con là 06 tháng. Trường hợp lao động nữ sinh đôi trở lên thì tính từ con thứ hai trở đi, cứ mỗi con, người mẹ được nghỉ thêm 01 tháng. Thời gian nghỉ hưởng chế độ thai sản trước khi sinh tối đa không quá 02 tháng.
3. A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater reliance on electronic mail
(e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of
privacy and public access rights. In some investigations, access to all e-mail, including those messages stored in
archival files and messages outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this,
some people send messages through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face or written formally.
Option (a), A few emails that were obtained as part of investigations contained statements that would never be made in person.
Are emails permitted to be used in investigations?"Email forensics" refers to exactly what it says. the forensically sound analysis of emails and their content to determine their origin, date, time, sender identity, and intended recipients. Making admissible digital evidence that may be utilized in criminal or civil actions is the goal of this.
Here is an example of a test question that is worded negatively. The text DOES NOT support the conclusion that is demanded. This implies that, while four of the statements are valid inferences from the text, only one of them is. Response B (certain remarks that people would never make face-to-face are expressed in e-mail messages) is a fair conclusion since it restates a truth established in the last sentence of the paragraph. Since some emails contain information that would be omitted in formal writing, response E, which restates the other fact in the final phrase of the paragraph, is acceptable.
The second-to-last sentence of the paragraph is the source of replies C (certain email communications have been requested as part of investigations) and D (email messages have not been excluded from investigations). Each of these alternatives reiterates the details in that line based on the fact that access to email messages was sought and granted. The only option remaining at this stage is Response A (Some email conversations that were collected as part of investigations contained messages that would never be stated face-to-face). The only alternative that does not reflect a legitimate conclusion is this one since there is no proof that emails that are sought as part of investigations and emails that include material that would not be discussed in person coincide. Simply put, we are unsure.
Learn more about formal writing: https://brainly.com/question/16156346
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater reliance on electronic mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances of conflict between the users? expectations of privacy and public access rights. In some investigations, access to all e-mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face or written formally.
Some e-mail messages that have been requested as part of investigations have contained messages that would never be said face-to-faceSome messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-mail messagesSome e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigationsE-mail messages have not been exempted from investigationsSome e-mail messages contain information that would be omitted from formal writingAt higher temperatures, particles of a gas move
Answer:
In gases the particles move rapidly in all directions, frequently colliding with each other and the side of the container. With an increase in temperature, the particles gain kinetic energy and move faster.
Question 7 of 10
According to the circular flow model, which of the following is something
consumers do that influences producers?
A. Purchase goods and services
B. Produce goods and services
C. Provide wages and profits
D. Use land and capital
SUBM
Answer:
A. Purchase goods and services
LAW:
What does the Bad Frog case stand for? Do you agree with any of the
courts' decisions? How would you have ruled and why if you were the
judge in this case?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.
a dealership that fails to comply with safeguards procedures can be subject to fines _____ for each violation.
A dealership that fails to comply with safeguards procedures can be subject to fines $2500 for each violation.
A knowing infringement of the dealership results in a $2,500 common punishment for every infringement, and "every infringement" might actually be deciphered as being 1 infringement for each client. On the off chance that the vendor is sufficiently unfortunate to get a "stop and cease" letter from the FTC, they could be having to deal with extra damages up to $11,000 per infringement.
On December 9, 2021, the FTC distributed updates to the Shields Decide that add extra necessities for dealerships, some of which became viable on January 10, 2022 and the rest of which require consistence by December 9, 2022. Showrooms ought to start getting ready now to fulfill the December time constraint as the extra advances expected for consistence can't be achieved for the time being.
To know more about dealership,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/25666771
#SPJ4
The General Aviation Act of 1994/ Tort Reform established that the time period for potential liability for aircraft manufacture or faulty maintenance goes back
The General Aviation Act of 1994/ Tort Reform established that the time period for potential liability for aircraft manufacture or faulty maintenance goes back to 18 years.
How far back in time does the General Aviation Act of 1994/ Tort Reform stipulate the time period for potential liability for aircraft manufacture or faulty maintenance?The General Aviation Act of 1994/ Tort Reform stipulates that the time period for potential liability for aircraft manufacture or faulty maintenance goes back to 18 years.What is the General Aviation Act of 1994/ Tort Reform?The General Aviation Act of 1994/Tort Reform is a type of liability reform that was established by Congress in 1994.
This act amended the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 by adding a new section to it, which set the statute of repose at 18 years. The statute of repose is the time period after which an action cannot be brought against the manufacturer or maintainer of an aircraft for any harm that the aircraft may have caused. It is different from the statute of limitations, which specifies the time period within which a legal action must be filed.
Learn more about potential liability here:https://brainly.com/question/29236779
#SPJ11
how is federalism seen throughtout the judical branch?
Answer:
interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed
Explanation:
The judiciary is such a body that interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed. Besides, in federal states, disputes between the Centre and States are common and natural. The judiciary also resolves the disputes between the Centre and States as well as between the States.
george washington occupation and political expierience of the delegates to the constituation convention
Washington was just as upset with the rebels themselves as he was with the weak Congress' failure to put an end to Shays' Rebellion.
He reserved his most venomous scorn for those who begged him to utilise his considerable "power" to contribute to the restoration of peace.
Washington attended the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention in 1787 as a delegate because he was worried about the country's impending collapse. He presided over the convention, and ratifying the newly proposed Constitution was made possible thanks in large part to his assistance.
He led the Constitutional Convention, trying to establish a consensus while enforcing total secrecy as the delegates began the contentious task of not only amending but completely replacing the Articles of Confederation.
To know more about george washington refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/815647
#SPJ1
Think of the ways that Nationalist sentiment has an effect on life in contemporary America. Please look beyond the easy "Trumpism" stereotypes, and instead discuss what self-proclaimed nationalists believed before he ever came along. Why is this ideology so appealing to so many people?
Answer:
nationalism is the concept of pride for your country, nationalists believe in the America first idea, and that nothing could ever top the individual liberties, policies, and freedoms of America