Yes, All of the underlying elements of a crime must be proven by the prosecutor: Actus reus, Mens rea, Causation, Concurrence, and legality.
What are the elements to prove that a crime has been committedIn criminal law, the prosecutor must establish several underlying elements to prove that a crime has been committed. These elements include:
1. Actus reus: This refers to the criminal act itself. The prosecutor must show that the defendant performed a voluntary action that resulted in a crime, such as theft or assault.
2. Mens rea: This is the mental state of the defendant at the time of the crime. The prosecutor must prove that the defendant had criminal intent or a "guilty mind" when committing the act.
3. Causation: The prosecutor must establish a clear link between the defendant's actions and the outcome of the crime. This element proves that the defendant's actions directly caused the crime to occur.
4. Concurrence: This element demonstrates that both the actus reus and mens rea occurred at the same time, meaning the defendant had criminal intent while performing the criminal act.
5. Legality: The prosecutor must show that the defendant's actions violated an existing criminal law or statute.
By proving all of these underlying elements, the prosecutor can establish that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged.
The burden of proof lies with the prosecutor, and all elements must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to secure a conviction.
Learn more about prosecutor at
https://brainly.com/question/30482974
#SPJ11
It is estimated that enforcing AmericaÕs drug laws costs the federal government about _____ annually
It is estimated that enforcing America's drug laws costs the federal government about $47 billion annually.
The federal government and state governments share political authority in a federalist system.
A system of administration known as federalism divides power between a central authority and various national constituent parts. In a federation, there are at least two levels of governance. Each of these levels of government is somewhat autonomous from the others.
A system of administration known as federalism divides power between a central authority and various national constituent parts. Two levels of governance are common in federations. One is the federal government, which is in charge of a few matters that affect the entire country generally.
An authoritarian government is one in which the public plays no part and the government alone has all the power and authority. All decisions made by the king must be obeyed by all citizens.
Learn more about government here
https://brainly.com/question/31333536
#SPJ11
an employer can eliminate a worker’s medical, optical, or dental insurance coverage on the voluntary termination of the worker’s employment.
Answer:
an employer can eliminate a worker’s medical, optical, or dental insurance coverage on the voluntary termination of the worker’s employment.
True
Which position do proponents of situational crime prevention hold in terms of criminal disposition?
A.
They accept the idea that people have criminal dispositions.
B.
They reject the idea that people have criminal dispositions.
C.
They believe that criminal dispositions are prominent in people raised in troubled homes.
D.
They believe that criminal dispositions are prominent in people raised in low-income families.
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
the others are incorrect.
Answer:
Its A
Explanation:
I took the test
Which of these is an economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law?
A workers are guaranteed a certain income
B. Employers are encouraged to hire more workers
C. Employers are required to train more workers
D. Workers are allowed to organize into unions
Answer: B
Explanation:
The economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law can be summarized, as workers being guaranteed a certain income. Hence, Option (A) is correct.
This means that employers must pay their employees at least the minimum wage, providing workers with a baseline level of compensation.
By ensuring that workers receive a certain income, the minimum wage law helps to protect them from extremely low wages and potential exploitation.
It establishes a basic standard of living and provides economic security for workers, particularly those in low-wage jobs.
Thus, this economic benefit aims to improve workers' financial well-being and reduce poverty rates by setting a floor on wages in the labor market.
Learn more about minimum wage law here:
https://brainly.com/question/31859230
#SPJ2
Mr. Nguyen understands that Medicare prescription drug plans can use a formulary or list of covered drugs. He is suspicious about how plans establish these formularies. What should you tell him?
Answer:
He should be made to understand that formularies must be developed with input from health practitioners such as pharmacists,doctors, etc.
Explanation:
Mr. Nguyen is suspicious about how plans establish these formularies. His suspicions should be allayed by explaining the basic principles of how formularies are established.
This involves the input of Health practitioners or experts who focus on various properties of the formularies to ensure it has a high efficacy and fit for consumption.
Fear of crime (a lot, some, none) is blank measurement
The excessive fear of crime provokes criminal victimization, which is measured by the crime rate.
What is the crime rate?The crime rate refers to the ratio or proportion of felonies and misdemeanors in the population.
Criminal victimization refers to a person who is the victim of a violent crime, which results in a general sense of vulnerability, signs of physical and social decay, and inter-group conflict.
Resilience, coping, and policing strategies must be employed to reduce the fear of crime and the victimization of vulnerable individuals.
Thus, the excessive fear of crime provokes criminal victimization, which is measured by the crime rate.
Learn more about the crime rate at https://brainly.com/question/13772436
#SPJ1
If I was a reporter in the country of Washington D.C and the President sent the Secret Service and they told me that I cannot report anything about the president anymore. What amendment is the government infringing on (what amendment protects me from that)?
Answer:
The First Amendment
Explanation:
In the United States Constitution, the First Amendment state that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Thus, Freedom of the PRESS is part of the United States First Amendment, that protects the right of individuals to acquire and disseminate data or viewpoints without government censorship or concern of penalty.
Hence, in this case, the amendment the government is infringing on is THE FIRST AMENDMENT
How do key character traits or expectations of government leaders differ among the branches?
Answer:
Powers are separated among different agencies or branches of government. Each agency ... LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION THROUGH ELECTIONS. ... C. TRAITS OF CIVIC CHARACTER.
Using your community’s online resources, describe the different steps in assisting children with special needs. Also, list the community’s resources for families of children with special needs and describe the services they offer.
my community is my Los Angeles CA
Different steps in assisting a child with special needs include such as an optimistic attitude, attention to detail, educating yourself, regular developmental assistance and expert guidance.
There are several factors to take into account when looking for the ideal special needs resources for your family, including but not limited to what you expect from the organization. Children with disabilities have special chances to support their entry into postsecondary education, employment, and full adult engagement in society. By giving teenagers direction while they explore their interests, advice on how to plan their careers and college educations, and support as they pursue their goals, families may help with the transition process. These help might be near the school or in the neighbourhood and open to the family. It includes: i) materials for educators and students with special needs; ii) student transportation; iii) speech therapy; iv) physical and occupational therapy; v) counselling for kids, parents, and educators; and vii) medical care.
Learn more about employment here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!! ILL GIVE 100 POINTS
Identifie similarities between the Georgia State Level Government and the United States Federal Government for the Legislative, Executive and Judicial Branches
Answer: you can just use an online source all the similarities and everything else is on the internet
Explanation:
When Edwin Sutherland closely examined companies in the United States, what was he surprised to find?
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. Most of the executives were secretly blue-collar workers.
B. Companies were careful never to violate American law.
C. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was unintentional.
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Answer:
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Explanation:
Edwin Sutherland was surprised to discover scenes of corruption and violation of laws within American industries. He was even more surprised when he discovered that these violations were done intensionally, promoting the benefit of entrepreneurs who had no commitment to order and honesty. These crimes are known as White Collar and are made by people who already live a wealthy life and without economic difficulties.
Answer:
Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Explanation:
I took the quiz
I Promise it's worth a lot of points
Mock Trial
identify and summarize each of the following individual role.
plaintiff + defendant
lawyers
witnesses
judge
jury
Write a 1 To 2 Paragraph exploring what the conversation may have been while the jury was deliberating. what did they discuss? How did they reach a conclusion?
Answer:
Write a 1 To 2 Paragraph exploring what the conversation may have been while the jury was deliberating. what did they discuss? How did they reach a conclusion?
Explanation:
This research project, which took more than a year to complete, would not have been
possible without the cooperation and support of a large number of people and organizations
committed to improving American jury trials.
We start by acknowledging and thanking the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Office of
Justice Programs, United States Department of Justice, for funding the project and the associated
NIJ Visiting Fellowship grantee B. Michael Dann was privileged to enjoy. Special thanks are
owed Christopher A. Innes, Chief of the Justice Systems Research Division, Office of Research
and Evaluation, NIJ, for his support, suggestions and patience during the fellowship and research
project. Many others at NIJ are owed thanks as well, but the Director, Sarah V. Hart, was
especially interested and encouraging. NIJ DNA experts Dr. Lisa Forman and Kim Herd, an
Assistant U.S. Attorney and former Special Assistant to the NIJ Director on DNA, offered
valuable technical advice in the project’s early planning phases.
NIJ’s financial grant was administered by the National Center for State Courts in
Williamsburg, Virginia. That indispensable work was ably performed by Sherry KeeseeBuchanan and Mary Hogan and overseen by Paula Hannaford Agor at the National Center.
Nicole Waters provided expert assistance with the statistical analyses.
We are indebted to the members of the project’s Advisory Committee who gave us
invaluable counsel and advice concerning research design and which jury trial innovations to
test, among other things. The Advisory Committee was chaired by Judge Ronald S. Reinstein, a
trial judge from Phoenix, Arizona, and member of NIJ’s Commission on the Future of DNA
Evidence; Robert P. Biancavilla, Deputy Chief, Nassau County (New York) District Attorney’s
Office; Connie L. Fisher, Forensic Examiner, FBI Laboratory, Quantico, Virginia; Paula
Hannaford-Agor, Principal Court Research Consultant, National Center for State Courts,
Williamsburg, Virginia; Judge Gregory E. Mize, Superior Court for the District of Columbia
(Ret.); Anjali R. Swienton, Consultant, SciLaw Forensics, Ltd., Germantown, Maryland; and
Beth Wiggins, Senior Research Associate, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, D.C. Professor
William Shields, of the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, served as an
additional resource on mtDNA analysis, answering questions and providing us with useful
material about the interpretation of mtDNA tests.
We recruited several cast members for two separate tapings of the “trial” for use in the
subsequent mock jury trials. The first shoot took place in June 2003, in Tempe, Arizona, at the
Arizona State University College of Law. The Tempe cast included Leonard Ruiz, an Arizona
prosecutor; Susan Corey and Chad Pajerski, local public defenders; James Humphrey, a former
Phoenix Police Department detective; Katherine Dann, a student at George Washington
University; and Elliot Goldstein, Professor of Biology, Arizona State University. The
videographer in Arizona was Manny Garcia of Manny Garcia Productions, Inc. In Phoenix.
Attorney Mara Siegel, another local public defender, consulted regarding the script.
In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law:
A. Only applies to women B. Only applies to men C. Only applies to the workplace D. Applies to both men and women in any setting
The correct option is D. Applies to both men and women in any setting. In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law applies to both men and women in any setting.
This landmark ruling established that sexual harassment is a form of discrimination that is prohibited by law, regardless of the gender of the victim or the location of the incident. The decision has had significant implications for workplace policies and practices, as well as for the legal rights of victims of sexual harassment.
In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law applies to both men and women in any setting (Option D). This decision ensures equal protection under the law for all individuals, regardless of their gender, in situations involving sexual harassment.
Learn more about legal rights here:- brainly.com/question/28024586
#SPJ11
The correct option is D. Applies to both men and women in any setting. In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law applies to both men and women in any setting.
This landmark ruling established that sexual harassment is a form of discrimination that is prohibited by law, regardless of the gender of the victim or the location of the incident. The decision has had significant implications for workplace policies and practices, as well as for the legal rights of victims of sexual harassment.
In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law applies to both men and women in any setting (Option D). This decision ensures equal protection under the law for all individuals, regardless of their gender, in situations involving sexual harassment.
Learn more about legal rights here:- brainly.com/question/28024586
#SPJ11
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
A motorist should keep at least ___ feet behind a signaling
A motorist should keep at least 100 feet behind a signaling.
Drivers, often known as motorists, must pay attention to pedestrians and avoid using bike lanes.
The term "motorists" is frequently used in news reports when discussing groups of drivers, such as all of the drivers in Chicago's downtown or the rural drivers on two-lane highways.
Motorist is another word for "driver," which initially originated in the late 19th century, around the time the first autos did, and originally meant "motor car driver." Motorists need to be alert of pedestrians and stay out of bike lanes.
The word "motorists" frequently appears in news reports when discussing drivers as a group, such as all the motorists in downtown Chicago.
To know more about the Motorist visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1114291
#SPJ9
discuss the importance of every parts of police operational planning?
what are the three competence expect from good/ideal citizens
Answer: Citizenship competencies allow for citizens to respect and defend human rights, to contribute actively to a peaceful living, to participate responsibly and constructively in the democratic processes and to respect and value plurality and differences.
Explanation:
The three competence expect from good/ideal citizens are that the citizenship competencies enable citizens to respect and defend human rights, actively contribute to peaceful living, responsibly and constructively participate in democratic processes.
What are the human rights?Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.
Human rights are fundamental rights that all of us have simply by virtue of our humanity. They exemplify important societal values such as fairness, dignity, equality, and respect. They are a significant form of protection for all of us, especially those who may be subjected to abuse, neglect, or isolation.
Learn more about the human rights, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ5
what is criminology?
Explanation:
Criminology is the scientific study of crime from a social view, it includes its causes and methods of prevention.
Answer:
Hello There!!
Explanation:
Criminology is a study learning about crimes and deviant behaviour including how and why crimes occur and also ways to control and prevent criminal actions.
hope this helps,have a great day!!
~Pinky~
How can state governments make national policy directly without Congress ever voting on the matter?
It is possible for the attorneys general of the states to file a lawsuit against a corporation and then settle the case with an agreement that binds the whole industry throughout the nation.
This is further explained below.
What is national policy?Generally, In 1876, John A. Macdonald's Conservative Party in Canada presented an economic plan known as the National Policy to the country's population. In 1879, after the success of the Conservative Party under Macdonald's leadership in the Canadian federal election of 1878, he started putting his plan into action.
In conclusion, The attorneys general of the states can bring a lawsuit against a business and settle it with an agreement that applies to the whole industry.
Read more about national policy
https://brainly.com/question/13608554
#SPJ1
Do you think we should have a separate system for processing juvenile offenders?
Answer:
Since the 1970s, the juvenile justice system has sought to place juveniles in separate facilities to shield them from the criminogenic influences (those tending to produce crime or criminals) of older, adult offenders. Removing children from jails is an ongoing reform initiative. The primary goals of the juvenile justice system, in addition to maintaining public safety, are skill development, habilitation, rehabilitation, addressing treatment needs, and successful reintegration of youth into the community. Learn more about the juvenile justice process.
A typical Crop-Hail policy will likely cover ALL the following perils, EXCEPT:
A. lightning
B. failure to harvest.
C. fire.
D. transit to storage after harvest.
Answer:
fire
Explanation:
hope this may help you have a nice day.A typical Crop-Hail policy will likely cover ALL the following perils, except fire.
What are crops?A plant that may be widely cultivated and harvested for food or profit is considered to be a crop. A crop is what is produced when many plants of the same sort are grown in one location. Most plants are grown in hydroponic systems or through agriculture. Macroscopic fungi (like mushrooms) and marine macroalga (like seaweed) are examples of crops, some of which are raised in aquaculture.
Crop-hail insurance is a type of insurance that covers loss and destruction brought on by both fire and hail. It is a product that farmers buy to safeguard agricultural goods while they are still in the field and unharvested.
Therefore, Thus option(C) is correct.
Learn more about crops here:
https://brainly.com/question/801194
#SPJ2
The ruling that schools can censor student publications if there is a legitimate educational concern was issued in which case ?
Answer:
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Explanation:
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, the high court ruled that school officials can censor school-sponsored publications if their decision is “reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical purpose.”
Why are laws important in our society? Explain.
Answer:The law is important as it serves as a guide about what is agreed in society. Without it, there will be tension between social classes and cultures. We must pursue them. The legislation makes it possible to accept improvements that exist in society.
why agency by estoppel forces a principal to be bound by an unauthorized contract.
Answer:
Explanation:
Agency by estoppel is a legal principle that arises when a principal, by their words or conduct, leads a third party to believe that another person (the agent) has the authority to act on their behalf. When this happens, the principal may be bound by an unauthorized contract made by the agent, even if the principal did not intend to give the agent authority to act.
The reason for this is that the third party, who reasonably relied on the principal's words or conduct, would suffer unfair harm or loss if the principal was allowed to deny the agent's authority after the fact. Therefore, agency by estoppel is designed to prevent unjust outcomes and promote fairness in commercial transactions.
For example, suppose a company's CEO tells a vendor that their sales manager has the authority to purchase goods on behalf of the company up to a certain amount. If the sales manager later exceeds that amount and the company refuses to pay, the vendor may be able to hold the company liable for breach of contract through an agency by estoppel. This is because the vendor relied on the CEO's representation of the sales manager's authority and would suffer harm if the company were allowed to deny it.
In summary, an agency by estoppel holds a principal liable for the actions of an agent, even if the agent's authority was not explicitly granted, to prevent unfairness and promote reliance in commercial transactions.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
calista is an enthusiastic gun owner and a supporter of extensive gun ownership rights. yet, she is not a member of the national rifle association or any other interest groups that lobbies for the rights of gun owners. calista is the efforts of the national rifle association as well as other pro-gun interest groups and their members.
Indeed, calista is an enthusiastic gun owner and a supporter of extensive gun ownership rights. yet, she is not a member of the national rifle association or any other interest groups that lobbies for the rights of gun owners.
Calista is free riding on the efforts of the national rifle association as well as other pro-gun interest groups and their members.
About National rifle association
The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) is a U.S.-based organisation that promotes gun rights. The contemporary NRA, which was originally founded in 1871 to enhance rifle marksmanship, is a well-known gun rights advocacy group that still promotes firearm competence and safety. Additionally, the company produces a number of periodicals and supports professional shooting competitions. The NRA claims that as of December 2018, it has approximately 5 million members, however this number has not been officially verified. One of the most powerful advocacy organisations in American politics is the NRA.
To know more about National rifle association:
brainly.com/question/14211008
#SPJ4
Is it ok to plead guilty to a charge you didn't commit?.
How does the U.S. government influence the market economy?
It tells companies how much to charge for all goods.
It provides public goods and services.
It prevents states from collecting taxes.
It buys companies in foreign markets.
69 points man
for the memes
Answer:
It provides public goods and supplies
Explanation:
Governments can create subsidies, taxing the public and giving the money to an industry, or tariffs, adding taxes to foreign products to lift prices and make domestic products more appealing. Higher taxes, fees, and greater regulations can stymie businesses or entire industries.
By the end of this course, you’ll be able to dissect an argument in two seconds flat, but at the moment you might find it difficult to see exactly how a speech has been constructed and how it manages to be successful or not. Find another video of a persuasive speech online, this time in English. It doesn’t matter whether you’re already familiar with it or not. Listen carefully to the speech several times and try to write down a plan of the speaker’s main points. Assess whether or not the claims he or she makes are really justified. Is everything they say really backed up by a fact or figure, and if it is, do you think this fact or figure is reliable? Are there any parts of the speech you didn’t understand or weren’t persuaded by? Make detailed notes of around 300 words or more
In order to dissect an argument, one must carefully analyze it paragraph by paragraph.
Note that to analyze a persuasive speech one must follow certain steps.
Parts of speech can be identified and understudied for better understanding.
What are the steps?The steps to analyzing persuasive speech are:
identifying the main points assessing claims for justification and evidenceevaluating logical coherenceconsidering the target audience and reflecting on personal reactions. Detailed notes will be taken and shared.A persuasive speech is a form of communication where the speaker aims to convince or persuade the audience to adopt their viewpoint or take a specific action.
Note that Speech analysis involves examining the content, structure, delivery, and effectiveness of a speech,identifying rhetorical devices, persuasive techniques, and evaluating its impact on the audience.
Learn more about persuasive speech at:
https://brainly.com/question/14047451
#SPJ1
To analyze a persuasive speech, carefully listen to the main points and assess the justification of the claims made. Evaluate the evidence and reliability of the facts provided. Take note of any parts of the speech that are not understood or not persuasive.
Explanation:When conducting an in-depth analysis of a persuasive speech, it becomes paramount to meticulously scrutinize the key points articulated by the speaker while critically assessing the validity of the claims made. This process involves a comprehensive approach.
First and foremost, active listening is key. Repeatedly listening to the speech is advisable to grasp its nuances fully. During this process, it's crucial to maintain detailed notes, organizing them coherently to track the speaker's argument structure.
The backbone of this evaluation is the examination of supporting evidence. Investigate whether the speaker furnishes credible facts, statistics, or anecdotes to bolster their claims. Assess the reliability of these sources to ensure the information presented is trustworthy.
Furthermore, pay close attention to segments of the speech that may have left you unconvinced or perplexed. These points of contention are opportunities for critical analysis. What made them less persuasive? Was it the evidence, the logic, or the delivery?
Ultimately, this rigorous analysis serves to dissect how a speech is constructed, revealing its strengths and weaknesses. It empowers individuals to discern between well-crafted persuasive speeches and those that fall short in achieving their intended impact, fostering a deeper understanding of effective communication.
Learn more about Analyzing a persuasive speech here:https://brainly.com/question/31539434
#SPJ12
What does the proverb, "Motse go swa mabapi" mean? a. People help each other. O b. Harmony in love. O c. Together we stand, divided we fall.
Answer:
The answer is a.
People help each other.
I hope this is helpful!
Which of the following is the lowest category for an offense resulting in the death of another person?
- Manslaughter
- Murder
- Capital murder
- Criminally negligent homicide
Answer:
Criminally negligent Homicide
Hope this helps
Explanation: