In response to the British attempt to recruit black soldiers for the Revolutionary War, New York promised freedom to any slaves who would enlist and serve in the military for three years in exchange for their owners receiving a land prize.
As a response to the British bid for black support during the Revolutionary War, New York offered freedom to all slaves who would serve in the army for three years, with their owners given a land bounty for their slaves. This was seen as a way to counteract the British strategy of offering freedom to slaves who joined their forces, and also as a recognition of the role that black soldiers played in the fight for independence. However, it is important to note that this offer of freedom was not extended to all slaves, and it was still conditional on their service to the army.
Learn more about Revolutionary War here
https://brainly.com/question/1466912
#SPJ11
In the midst of the American Revolution, the British sought to gain support from black individuals, who they believed could be swayed to their side in the conflict. To this end, the British offered freedom to any slaves who would fight for them, a move which was seen as highly controversial by American slave-owners.
In response to this bid for support, New York offered a similar deal to its enslaved population, promising freedom to those who served in the army for a certain number of years. This offer was made in 1775, at a time when the Revolutionary War was just beginning to heat up, and both sides were eager to gain support from any available source.
While this offer of freedom was no doubt appealing to some enslaved individuals, it was not without its drawbacks. For one thing, the idea of serving in a war that was not necessarily their own may not have been particularly appealing to all slaves, especially those who did not necessarily identify with the American cause.
Additionally, the fact that their owners would be given a land bounty for their slaves may have made some slaves wary of the offer, as they may have feared that their owners would not actually release them from bondage.
Nevertheless, this offer of freedom from New York was a significant moment in the history of the Revolutionary War, and it speaks to the complex relationships between slavery, freedom, and the American Revolution.
To know more about owner refer home
https://brainly.com/question/20333214#
#SPJ11
Which style of communication should officers maintain?
-Aggressive
-Passive
-Assertive
-Passive-aggressive
What were two critical findings of the ABA survey of restitution directors?
Answer:
Findings from a study conducted by the American Bar Association (ABA), Improving Enforcement of Court-Ordered Restitution, suggest that higher compliance rates result: (1) when efforts are made to monitor payments, and (2) when consistent action is taken to respond to delinquencies.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
how can the principle of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims
Answer:
The officials should research the crime area and they should also get the statements from the person who killed. Until all the investigation is completed, they should treat the person as neither criminal nor victim. ... In principles of Ubuntu, a victim should be treated with broad humanity and ethics
Explanation:
The President nominates a judge to a federal court but the Senate does not confirm (approve) the appointment. This act serves as a check on which TWO branches of government? (CHOOSE TWO)
Answer:
Executive and Legislative (or vise versa)
Explanation:
Executive is the President. Executive enforces the laws. The President also appoints judges.
The Legislative such as The Senate and House of Representatives make the laws.
Therefore, This would be a check on these two branches of Government.
A judge dismissed charges against seven people for their role in a water scandal in which michigan city where tens of thousands were exposed to dangerous levels of lead?.
A judge has dismissed charges against seven people in the Flint water scandal, including two former state health officials blamed for deaths from Legionnaires' disease. FILE - The Flint water plant tower is seen on Jan. 6, 2022, in Flint, Mich.
What is scandal?Scandal is a term used to describe dishonourable, shameful, or demeaning actions or conduct that causes shame to a person or society at large. Any false information, harmful rumour, or gossip, particularly slander that harms someone's reputation or character, can fall under this category.
Any individual who disturbs or embarrasses others in public while intoxicated or otherwise, provided that the circumstances do not make the prohibitions of Article 153 relevant.
A scandal is generally understood to be the significant social reactions of outrage, fury, or surprise that arise when rumours or charges about a person or people who are thought to have violated some rule spread or appear for whatever reason.
To learn more about scandal visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3872181
#SPJ13
What is the nature of goodness in the context of filipino values?
Answer:
Good traditional Filipino values
Enumeration of Filipino values
Family orientation.
Joy and humor.
Flexibility, adaptability, and creativity.
Religious adherence.
Ability to survive.
Hard work and industriousness.
Hospitality.
Explanation: Hope that this helps!!
Why was the National Association of Insurance Commissioners created?
Answer: Founded in 1871, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners was created as a non-governmental organization that has since created and maintained a uniform set of laws for states to follow in an attempt to standardize multiple-state insurance laws.
The E-SIGN Act allows for:
Answer: down there
Explanation:
The E-Sign Act allows the use of electronic records to satisfy any statute, regulation, or rule of law requiring that such information be provided in writing, if the consumer has affirmatively consented to such use and has not withdrawn such consent.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
lawyer's client, Consuela, reveals that she is cheating on her spouse, which is why she was taking an unusual route to work. While taking this different route, her tire got punctured and she had to step out of the car to check it out. While Consuela was taking a look at the tire, a random man (whom she did not know) ran past Consuela and slipped a murder weapon in her bag. Just as she was getting the murder weapon out of her bag, the cops arrived and arrested Consuela as an accessory to murder. Prosecutors contend that Consuela knows who the "random man" is, and they allege that she has assisted that man to escape capture. Despite the serious charges against Consuela, she tells her lawyer that she does not want to disclose the real reason why she was taking a different route to work (that she had gone that route in order to be with her paramour - the person with whom she was having an affair). Is the lawyer permitted to reveal what Consuela told her - the reason she was taking that route? Yes, because it serves as evidence and will prevent the client from getting framed. Yes, because the client told the lawyer, which automatically means the lawyer can reveal that information in courts. Yes, because of the mandatory disclosure rule. O No; in this case, the lawyer may only reveal a client's spoken intent to soon commit a crime (i.e., to carry out an impending crime). O No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty
The lawyer is not permitted to reveal what Consuela told her about the reason she was taking the route. Thus the correct answer is D: "No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty".
The reason for Consuela's detour is not relevant to the criminal charge against her, which is being an accessory to murder. Revealing the reason for the detour would violate the attorney-client privilege, which protects communications between a lawyer and client from disclosure. This privilege exists to encourage clients to be candid with their lawyers, which allows lawyers to provide effective legal representation. Therefore, the lawyer cannot reveal this information without the client's consent.
Learn more about attorney-client privilege https://brainly.com/question/30332486
#SPJ11
who led the strong opposition to the passage of the rizal law?
Sen. Claro M. Recto opposed the passage of Rizal Law because he believes the novels are not intended to instill patriotism and nationalism.
Catholic Action of the Philippines, the Congregation of the Mission, the Knights of Columbus, and the Catholic Teachers Guild were among those who opposed the bill, as were Veteranos de la Revolucion (Spirit of 1896), Alagad ni Rizal, the Freemasons, and the Knights of Rizal.
Only Francisco Soc Rodrigo, Mariano Jes Cuenco, and Decoroso Rosales voted against a bill co-written by José P. Laurel and Recto in the Senate Committee on Education.
The Archbishop of Manila, Rufino Santos, protested in a pastoral letter that requiring Catholic students to read the unexpurgated version would harm them.
Learn more about " rizal law " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/30449491
#SPJ4
An effective claim for an argumentative essay is
Answer:
An effective claim in an 'argumentative essay' is a true statement that can be proven using 'facts and cannot be countered'Hence, effective claim in an argumentative essay will be a true statement which is not hypothetical and can be proved with the help of evidences and facts.
Explanation:
the facts and data that support a statement of opinion in the text. the statement that takes a position on an issue or controversy. the explanation of how the evidence in the text supports a reason. the quotations from primary sources that are used to validate a fact.
have a good day
A WHITE, transverse line across your lane means:
A white, transverse line across your lane means: Lane Changing Position Ahead.
When there is a white, transverse line across your lane while driving, it typically indicates that there is a lane changing position ahead. This line serves as a visual guide to inform drivers that they are approaching an area where lanes may merge or split. It alerts drivers to be prepared for potential lane changes and to adjust their position accordingly.
The purpose of this marking is to ensure smooth traffic flow and provide advance warning to drivers, promoting safety and allowing them to navigate the upcoming lane change with caution and awareness. Therefore, a white, transverse line across your lane signifies a lane changing position ahead.
You can learn more about driving at
https://brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ11
A white, transverse line across a lane in driving denotes a point you must not cross until you intend to proceed, such as at an intersection, crosswalk, or before a stop sign or traffic light.
Explanation:In driving rules, a white, transverse line across your lane often signifies the point at which you are officially in the intersection or it may indicate a stop line. The stop line is a thick white line across the road that signals where vehicles must stop at intersections or pedestrian crossings.
For instance, at an intersection or a crosswalk, this is the line you should not cross until you intend to proceed, ensuring to yield to any pedestrians or oncoming traffic. If you're approaching a stop sign or traffic light, your vehicle should come to a complete stop before the stop line, not on or beyond it.
Learn more about Driving Rules here:https://brainly.com/question/32337531
#SPJ6
the part of the constitution that describes the legislative branch is?
Answer:
Article One of the United States Constitution.
Explanation:
In the United States constitution is marks the Legislative branch of the Government which consist a bicameral branch of the Government, the Upper level the Senate, and the Lower Level the House of Representatives, it also establishes the speaker role, who heads the senate, and the qualifications of someone to take a particular legislative office.
Injunctions are: Select one: a. mandatory if the court orders a party to refrain from doing certain acts. b. not a form of equitable remedy, which is granted depending on the equities of a case. c. used to compel personal service. d. available when a breach of contract threatens to produce an irreparable injury.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
In simple words, An injunction relates to the lawful and equal solution in the context of an unique court judgment which obliges a party to do or withdraw from particular acts."If a court allows use of an exceptional solution for an injunction, it orders the behaviour of a group and achieves so with complete coercive forces."
A group who refuses to comply via an order is liable to civil or criminal charges, including potential monetary fines and even incarceration. You may also be threatened with obstruction of trial. Rebuttal-injunctions are court rulings that prohibit or undo the execution of another order.
What kind of contract is a dvd of the month club?
Answer:
i think so Generic Contract
Explanation:
Generic Contract think so
Which of the following rights applied to all lineups? a) due process b) protection against unreasonable searches c) privilege against unreasonable searches
The right that applies to all lineups is "due process." The correct option is a.
A fundamental right known as due process ensures that people are treated fairly and that their rights are upheld during the identification process and is applicable to all lineups. It ensures that the lineup will be conducted in a way that respects each person's constitutional rights such as the right to an attorney, the right to confront witnesses and the right to remain silent.
Due process demands that the lineup be conducted impartially, fairly and with adequate notice and an opportunity to contest any suggestive or unjust identification practices. In addition to ensuring a fair and just legal system, it aims to stop any rights violations that may occur during the lineup process.
Learn more about due process at:
brainly.com/question/32405614
#SPJ4
why should the public have access to the technical records
Answer:
Because I feel we should be able to know what's going on but my opinion doesn't matter i learned that in college debate
Explanation:
which agreement must be signed between a criminal justice agency and a private contractor who accesses cji?
CJIS Security Addendum, a uniform agreement approved by the US Attorney General must be signed between a criminal justice agency and a private contractor who accesses CJI because it ensures the confidentiality.
All machines with TLETS access must be secured against any unauthorised access or routine viewing in accordance with the CJIS Security Policy. This includes network equipment, access equipment, portable electronics, laptops used in vehicles or other outside settings, printed data, and data that has been stored.
Adhering to certain guidelines established by criminal justice and law enforcement (at local, state, and federal levels) for protecting CJI data is required in order to be CJIS compliant. These guidelines for safeguarding the origins, transmission, storage, and creation of CJI are set forth in the CJIS Security Policy.
To know more about Vehicles, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13390217
#SPJ4
long-term effects of workplace bullying
Answer:
Bullying has 4 effects in the workplace.
Explanation:
The first effect is that it can lower morale, belief, and determination. It can even result in such low confidence, the worker quits. Secondly, bullying in the workplace can make the victim perform poorly, lowering the business' reputation and opportunities for fame and popularity. Bullying in the workplace also results in the bosses, CEOs, or employers firing the victims when he or she performs poorly as a result of the bullying. Lastly, bullying, when caught, causes the attacker's long-term reputation to be ruined.
What are the names of the major characters in the movie rainmaker
Answer:
Rudy baylor - main protagonist
cid- tritagonist/ main antagonist
An organization just completed a security audit. Your division was cited for not conforming to x. 509 requirements. What is the first security control you need to examine?.
The first security control that needs to be examined in relation to X.509 requirements is the implementation of a valid and trusted certificate authority (CA) infrastructure.
X.509 is a widely adopted standard for public key infrastructure (PKI), which includes digital certificates used for secure communication. To conform to X.509 requirements, the organization must ensure that a robust CA infrastructure is in place. This involves evaluating the CA's policies, procedures, and practices for issuing, managing, and revoking digital certificates.
Additionally, it is essential to review the CA's compliance with industry best practices, such as key management, certificate validation, and secure storage of private keys. By examining the CA infrastructure, the organization can address the cited non-conformance and improve its adherence to X.509 requirements.
Learn more about Organization
https://brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ11
Utilitarian approach O a. accounts for values such as justice and individual rights O b. None of the given statements O c. says with certainty whether the consequences of our actions will be good or bad O d. It is not the most common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of the way in which it accounts for costs and benefits
Telephone translator systems that provide translation services in many spoken languages are rare.
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
The escrow settlement procedure that involves the FREC giving direction to the broker is .. ?
Answer:
escrow disbursement order
Explanation:
Through the escrow disbursement order, a broker is able to access the instructions present in FREC, which will be able to guide the broker in the actions that must be taken to resolve the dispute between the parties. In this case, the broker must notify and request FREC within 10 working days, without considering weekends and holidays.
There are different steps in escrow settlement procedure. The escrow settlement procedure that involves the FREC giving direction to the broker is Escrow Disbursement Order .
An escrow is simply known as the arrangement that often does not please the third part who is also called an escrow holder or settlement agent. The third party is known to holds legal documents and funds on behalf of a buyer and seller, and can share them based on the buyer's and seller's instruction.
Escrow settlement procedure includes;
To request the FREC issue an Escrow Disbursement Order Using the consent of all parties involved, one has to submit the matter to arbitration etc.Learn more about Escrow from
https://brainly.com/question/24341254
What are the various causes of change in the quality of factors of production?
The quantity and quality of factors of production will change if there is a change in demand for and supply of land labour capital and enterprise. Possible changes include the following changes in cost of production.
a defendant charged with murder admitted to the killing but claimed that he shot the victim in self-defense as she attacked him with a knife. at trial, the investigating officer testified about the scene of the crime and the condition of the victim at the time of death. the prosecutor showed the officer a photograph of the scene of the crime taken by the police photographer and asked the officer whether the photograph accurately depicted what he had observed at the scene. the officer testified that it did. the photograph showed the deceased lying in a pool of blood with both her hands cut off.
Yes, its true that, according to the officer's testimony, yes. In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood.
The accused murderer admitted to the crime but insisted that he killed the victim out of self-defense after she lunged at him with a knife. The investigating officer gave testimony during the trial on the crime scene and the victim's health at the time of death. The prosecutor questioned the officer if the police photographer's image of the crime scene adequately captured what he had seen there. The prosecutor then showed the officer the photo. According to the officer's testimony, yes.
In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood. motive, planning, and earlier or later behavior.— Any truth that demonstrates or serves as a justification or preparation for any significant information or fact at issue is relevant.
Learn more about self-defense Visit: brainly.com/question/29542705
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
State true or false : A defendant charged with murder admitted to the killing but claimed that he shot the victim in self-defense as she attacked him with a knife. at trial, the investigating officer testified about the scene of the crime and the condition of the victim at the time of death. the prosecutor showed the officer a photograph of the scene of the crime taken by the police photographer and asked the officer whether the photograph accurately depicted what he had observed at the scene. the officer testified that it did. the photograph showed the deceased lying in a pool of blood with both her hands cut off.
The movie FINDING NEMO would fall under which intellectual property category? *
Answer: Copyright
Explanation:
Copyright category of IP Law that protects original works of authorship
- this extends to anything authored including literature, dramas, musicals, paintings, novels, songs, software, architecture, and movies!
hope this helps!
Secondary sources of law
Answer:
background resources.
An eight-year-old girl went to the grocery store with her mother. The girl pushed the grocery cart while her mother put items into it. The girl's mother remained near her at all times. The plaintiff, another customer in the store, noticed the girl pushing the cart in a manner that caused the plaintiff no concern. A short time later, the cart the girl was pushing struck the plaintiff in the knee, inflicting serious injury. If the plaintiff brings an action, based on negligence, against the girl, which of the following will be her best argument in defense?
A. Yes, if the girl was negligent.
B. Yes, because the girl's mother is responsible for any harm caused by the girl.
C. Yes, because the girl's mother assumed the risk of her child's actions.
D. Yes, if the girl's mother did not adequately supervise the girl's actions.
Answer:
the answer is C. because the mother did not push the cart but was near her daughter all times, the mother DID supervise her but the girl was pushing the cart and she DID crash but she wasn't planning to crash so the girl wasn't fully negligent but the mother was kinda responsible so that leaves the only option that still stands is C.
Yes, since the girl's mother accepted responsibility for her child's behavior. A further explanation is below.
The mother didn't pressure this same vehicle but remained close to her daughter throughout all circumstances; the mother DID watch her, but the child must have been moving the cart as well as she DID crash, even though she had no intention of doing so.Therefore the daughter was not completely careless, however, the mother was partly to blame, therefore the only alternative which thus remains is choice C.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/24662070