The prosecutor must have probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person being prosecuted committed the crime.
Probable cause is a legal standard that requires the prosecutor to have enough evidence to suggest that a crime has been committed and that the person being prosecuted is responsible for committing that crime. This evidence can come from witness statements, physical evidence, or other sources.
Without probable cause, the prosecutor cannot move forward with a criminal prosecution. This requirement is important to ensure that individuals are not unfairly accused or prosecuted for crimes without sufficient evidence to support the charges.
Once the prosecutor has established probable cause, they can file charges against the accused and proceed with the criminal trial process.
For more questions like Crime click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/31365862
#SPJ11
What were the highest positions in the government?
The UK government's highest positions are known as the Great Offices of State. They are, alternatively, three of those offices with the Prime Minister excluded: the Prime Minister, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Foreign Secretary, and Home Secretary.
What are the positions in UK government?In the UK, the Cabinet and ministers assist the Prime Minister in running the government. Along with studying about the history of government, you may discover who controls it and how it operates.
The prime minister comes in third place in the hierarchy. The Indian president appoints the prime minister; but, unless a prime minister resigns, the prime minister must have the support of the majority of the Lok Sabha members, who are directly elected every five years.
Thus, The UK government's highest positions are known as the Great Offices of State.
For more information about positions in UK government, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12038884
#SPJ1
Why would a lawyer allow a paralegal to assist defending a client in a criminal trial? (Select all that apply.) To prepare drafts of documents for the lawyer to review. To deal with the client so the lawyer can focus on issues of law. To get help with research. To help prepare the case for trial.
Answer:
I think it's "To get help with research. To help prepare the case for trial."
Explanation:
Your HIS Department receives an authorization for Sara May's medical history to be sent to her attorney, but the expiration date noted on the authorization has passed. What action is appropriate according to HIPAA privacy rules
According to HIPAA privacy rules, if authorization for the disclosure of a patient's medical history to their attorney has expired, the appropriate action is to withhold the disclosure of the information.
HIPAA regulations mandate that authorizations for the release of protected health information (PHI) must be valid and in effect at the time of the disclosure. Expired authorizations do not provide legal authority for the release of PHI. The healthcare provider or Health Information Services (HIS) department should not honor an expired authorization and should follow the principle of "minimum necessary" when it comes to the disclosure of PHI.
The HIS department should inform Sara May's attorney about the expiration of the authorization and advise them to obtain a new, valid authorization that complies with HIPAA requirements. It is essential to protect patient privacy and ensure compliance with HIPAA regulations to avoid any potential breaches or legal issues.
HIPAA regulations prioritize the privacy and security of individuals' health information, aiming to safeguard their rights and promote trust in the healthcare system. By adhering to these regulations and respecting the validity of authorizations, healthcare providers can maintain patient confidentiality while still facilitating appropriate and lawful information sharing when authorized by the patient.
know more about HIPAA here:
https://brainly.com/question/30081938
#SPJ11
How can rights be the flip side of responsibilities?
Right can be fliped to responsibilities because inorder to get rights you have to get reponsibilities and be responsible with your rights
what are the three competence expect from good/ideal citizens
Answer: Citizenship competencies allow for citizens to respect and defend human rights, to contribute actively to a peaceful living, to participate responsibly and constructively in the democratic processes and to respect and value plurality and differences.
Explanation:
The three competence expect from good/ideal citizens are that the citizenship competencies enable citizens to respect and defend human rights, actively contribute to peaceful living, responsibly and constructively participate in democratic processes.
What are the human rights?Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.
Human rights are fundamental rights that all of us have simply by virtue of our humanity. They exemplify important societal values such as fairness, dignity, equality, and respect. They are a significant form of protection for all of us, especially those who may be subjected to abuse, neglect, or isolation.
Learn more about the human rights, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ5
laws play a bigger role than parents do, when it comes to teen driving
Answer:
Yes because there are laws to prevent teen driving after a certain time.
Explanation:
Answer:
Not sure what the question is but this is true
Case 3
A single hair was found on the back of a couch. The evidence collector placed it in a paper bindle. He then inserted the paper bindle into a plastic evidence bag. Using tape, the evidence collector sealed the bag. After completing the evidence log and the chain-of-custody form, he brought the evidence bag to the crime lab. What did he do incorrectly?
Answer: When you have hair as evidence, using plastic in any way can damage/tamper with it. He should have put the paper bindle in an envelope instead of the bag.
Explanation:
If a person use their hair as evidence, any use of plastic can tamper with or harm it. He ought to have used an envelope rather than a bag to store the paper bindle.
What is paper bindle?Binder paper is nothing more than a blank sheet of paper folded in a specified manner over a number of steps. Use of paper that is 8 x 12 inches in size is practical. It can also be transported to the crime or accident scene because of its portability.
In modern popular culture, a bindle is portrayed as an object-carrying pole with fabric or a blanket wrapped around one end. Over the shoulder, the complete collection is carried. When gripping larger, heavier objects, in particular, the force was moved to the shoulder, enabling a more stable grip.
For binders: paper Sometimes clean paper that has been folded into a container is included in the packaging for gathering trace evidence.
Thus, If a person use their hair as evidence, any use of plastic can tamper with or harm it.
For more details about paper bindle, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/5616377
#SPJ2
Larry, who is deaf, purchased several items at a large chain discount store. One of the items was a large inflated doll for his daughter. Larry went to a cash register near a store entrance to pay for his goods. The doll was so large that the sales clerk could not find a bag to hold it. With the doll under his arm and his other purchases in bags held in both hands, Larry left the store. As he did so, a store employee stationed at the door to welcome people in and conduct security screens of those leaving, noticed the unbagged doll. The employee was instructed to stop and check the receipt of any party leaving the store with an unbagged item. As a consequence, she asked Larry to stop. When he did not, she shouted at him to stop. Finally, she yelled, “Stop thief,” and gave chase. Other store personnel joined in and threw Larry down onto the asphalt in the parking lot. Larry finally was able to make the store personnel understand he was deaf and that he had the receipt in his pocket. Upon seeing the receipt they let him go with apologies. Although he was embarrassed, his clothes torn, and his skin scraped, Larry accepted the apologies and left. Now he is reconsidering. Would it be ethical for Larry to bring suit against the discount store? Does Larry owe a duty to bring suit? If so, to whom and for what?
Answer from Chapter 5 Civil Law and Procedure
liability for statements made during the actual trial or hearing. Similarly, liability for defamatory statements about public officials or prominent personalities does not exist unless the statements were made with malice. That means the statement when issued was known to be false or was made with a reckless disregard for its probable falsehood. Invasion of Privacy People are entitled to keep personal matters private. This is the right to privacy. Congress has stated that the right of privacy is a personal and fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United States. Invasion of privacy is a tort defined as the uninvited intrusion into an individual s personal relationships and activities in a way likely to cause shame or mental suffering in an ordinary person. An invasion of privacy also can result from unnecessary publicity regarding personal matters. So, unlike the law regarding the tort of defamation, publication of even a true statement about someone may be an invasion of privacy. This is because, as the U.S. Supreme Court put it, you should be protected when you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Thus, two-way mirrors result of the slanderous remark. Exceptions to this occur in cases where the oral statements are to the effect that the plaintiff committed a serious crime, has a loathsome disease, or injures someone in his or her profession or business. In libel cases, you are presumed to have suffered a loss, and so these damages do not have to be shown to the court. Exceptions are made to the law of defamation in order to encourage open discussion of issues of public concern. For example, legislators statements, even those made with malice, are immune from liability if made during legislative meetings. Judges, lawyers, jurors, witnesses, and other parties in judicial proceedings are also immune from What are some situations related to the right to privacy that affect your life? BLEND IMAGES 5-2 Intentional Torts, Negligence, and Strict Liability 87
Which of the following refers to the legitimate source of criminal law?
A) specificity
B) uniformity
C) politicality
D) regularity
The correct answer is C) politicality. The term "politicality" refers to the legitimate source of criminal law. Criminal law is created and established by political entities, such as legislatures or governing bodies, within a particular jurisdiction.
These political entities have the authority to enact laws that define and prohibit certain behaviors as criminal offenses and establish corresponding penalties for those offenses. Specificity refers to the requirement that criminal laws be clear and precise in defining prohibited conduct and outlining the elements of the offense. Uniformity pertains to the consistent application and enforcement of criminal laws across a jurisdiction. Regularity relates to the adherence to established legal processes and procedures in the criminal justice system. However, it is politicality that specifically denotes the origin and authority behind criminal laws, as they are enacted by political entities to maintain social order and protect the interests of the community.
To know more about the legitimate source of criminal law, click here: brainly.com/question/29838873
#SPJ11
T/F A person who is in possession of a negotiable instrument that is drawn, issued, or indorsed to him or to his order, or to bearer, or in blank is called a(n) holder
The statement "A person who is in possession of a negotiable instrument that is drawn, issued, or indorsed to him or to his order, or to bearer, or in blank is called a(n) holder" is true as it is a true definition of holder.
A "holder" is a person who has a negotiable instrument in their possession that is drawn issued or inscribed to them their order to bearer or in blank. A holder is someone who has the legal right to exercise the privileges and rights attached to a negotiable instrument such as a promissory note a check or a bill of exchange.
The holder may be the initial payee, a subsequent transferee, or a third party who obtains the instrument by endorsement or negotiation. They have the authority to receive payment, transfer the instrument or enforce the terms of it as the holder.
Learn more about negotiable instrument at:
brainly.com/question/3522225
#SPJ4
I keep trying to sign up,but it keeps saying "I'm sorry but we cant sign you up right now" i think they wrote that? I don't know but they wrote something like that
Answer:
what are you talking about, pal? Are you talking about Brainly? I got banned from brainly yesterday, but now I'm back. So screw all moderators- I only had 12 warnings while others have 30 something.
in the u.s., public opinion most strongly favors which of the following in dealing with delinquent juveniles?
kinder and more rehabilitative. Children who violate the law in a way that would be considered criminal if they were adults are said to be delinquent.
What does a young offender look like?Juvenile criminal. a person, typically under the age of 18, who has been found guilty of breaking the law or committing a status violation in a state where a minor is considered to be incapable of handling their own affairs and who is not eligible for an adult penalty.
What are the primary factors that lead to juvenile crime?Psychological problems of all kinds can affect children and adolescents for a variety of reasons, including low socioeconomic position, parents' lack of concern, feelings of inadequacy, lack of attention, and many more. For instance, anxiety, fear, complexes, excessive anger, etc.
To know more about Delinquent juveniles visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2140805
#SPJ4
Why has the Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws?
The Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) has faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws due to several reasons.
One of the primary concerns raised by critics is the perceived lack of effectiveness and efficiency in the TEC's enforcement actions. Critics argue that the TEC has failed to adequately investigate and penalize violations of campaign laws, leading to a sense of impunity among those who may be engaging in questionable campaign practices. The commission has been criticized for being slow in processing complaints and for its limited resources, which may hinder its ability to thoroughly investigate and take appropriate actions.
Another point of criticism is the perception of political influence or bias within the TEC. Some argue that the commission is susceptible to political pressures or that its members may have affiliations or loyalties that compromise their objectivity. This raises concerns about the impartiality and fairness of the enforcement process, undermining public trust in the TEC's ability to regulate campaign finance and ethics.
Furthermore, there have been criticisms regarding the transparency and accountability of the TEC's actions. Critics claim that the commission's decision-making processes lack transparency, making it difficult for the public to understand the rationale behind its enforcement actions. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the perceived leniency of penalties imposed by the TEC, with critics arguing that they may not serve as sufficient deterrents for potential violators.
The complexity and ambiguity of campaign finance laws in Texas have also contributed to the criticism faced by the TEC. Some argue that the laws themselves are convoluted and open to interpretation, creating challenges for consistent enforcement. The lack of clear guidance and the complexity of reporting requirements can create confusion among candidates, political committees, and donors, leading to unintentional violations that are then subject to TEC scrutiny.
Overall, the severe criticism faced by the Texas Ethics Commission over its enforcement of campaign laws stems from concerns regarding its effectiveness, perceived political influence or bias, transparency, and the complexity of campaign finance laws. Addressing these concerns and ensuring a more robust and fair enforcement process will be essential for rebuilding public trust in the TEC's ability to uphold ethical standards and enforce campaign finance regulations effectively.
Learn more about Texas Ethics Commission here
https://brainly.com/question/14318950
#SPJ11
A taxpayer who rents out a home for at least one day and does not use a home for personal purposes for at least 15 days during the year is ineligible to deduct any qualified residence interest expense on a loan secured by the home.
A day of rental use is any day that the house is available for rent but isn't really rented out. The taxpayer's primary dwelling or a second home (a qualifying residence) must be used as security for the loan, along with additional conditions.
Rental Details refers to the "Rental Details" portion of the equipment rental agreement. Site denotes either the designated location for the Equipment in the Rental Details or another spot that Komatsu has approved. The term refers to the time frame starting on the Commencement Date and ending on the Completion Date or any other time frame that the parties may mutually agree upon in writing. The portion of a deed or conveyance (also known as the particulars) that details the lands being conveyed. The description might be expressed verbally or through a plan. Questions about which comes first may come up when a conveyance includes both a verbal description and a plan, especially when the two seem to clash.
learn more about Rental here:
https://brainly.com/question/14801076
#SPJ4
Which of the following is not standard drink
12 ounces of beer
Answer: 12 oz of beer
Explanation: In the United States, one "standard" drink (or one alcoholic drink equivalent) contains roughly 14 grams of pure alcohol, which is found in: 12 ounces of regular beer, which is usually about 5% alcohol. 5 ounces of wine, which is typically about 12% alcohol. 1.5 ounces of distilled spirits, which is about 40% alcohol.
HOPE IT HELPS
The standard which is not considered a drink is 12 ounces of beer with 8% alcohol. Hence, Option (A) is correct.
A standard drink is defined as the amount of alcohol that contains approximately 14 grams (0.6 ounces) of pure alcohol.
Let's analyze the given information:
1.5 ounces of spirits with 40% alcohol: This amount of spirits typically contains approximately 14 grams of pure alcohol, making it a Standard Drink.5 ounces of red wine with 12% alcohol: This amount of wine generally contains around 14 grams of pure alcohol, making it a Standard Drink.12 ounces of beer with 5% alcohol: This quantity of beer usually contains about 14 grams of pure alcohol, making it a Standard Drink.However, the 12 ounces of beer with 8% alcohol exceeds the alcohol content typically found in a Standard Drink.
Thus, it contains more than the usual amount of pure alcohol and, therefore, is not considered a Standard Drink.
Learn more about Standard Drink here:
https://brainly.com/question/28039452
#SPJ2
Whats a SACCER? ITSA
Answer:
Not a real phase.
Explanation:
a) Los niños
Y у
las ninas no raconan.
¿Que efectos tiene esta idea en los
niños y las niñois ?
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Los efectos que tiene esta idea en los niños y las niñas es la siguiente.
Se dice que los niños y las niñas no razonan. Y lo que sucede es que en esta etapa de la infancia el niño se desenvuelve por sus impulsos e imita lo que ve en los adultos.
Los expertos sociólogos comentan que hasta los 9 o 10 años de edad, los infantes no son capaces de razonar lo que hacen, y sólo se dejan llevar por sus impulsos. Por ello, no pueden sopesar las consecuencias de sus actos. Por esos son niños.
A esa edad, les gusta correr, jugar, no distinguen entre sus acciones y se limitan a observar y repetir conductas que observan de sus padres en casa. Como dicen los expertos. A esa edad, los niños son como unas "esponjas y lo absorben todo." Por eso hay que tener cuidado con lo que se les enseña.
According to Pennsylvania license law, the buyer has the right to cancel purchase of which' of the following
a. time-share
b. office space
c. house owned by the salesperson
d. apartment with outstanding mortgage
According to Pennsylvania license law, the buyer has the right to cancel the purchase of time-share. This correct answer option A.
Apartment with an outstanding mortgage. A timeshare is a type of property that you can own. It usually refers to holiday accommodation, such as an apartment or villa.
Timeshare properties are divided into sections that are sold to different owners. As a result, owners share the cost of the property's maintenance. They also have the right to use the property for a set period each year. This correct answer option A.
Learn more about mortgage
https://brainly.com/question/31751568
#SPJ11
Two guarantees that the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT) provides to its member states are most favored nation (MFN) status and promotion of equality in trade among member states.
True or False
"The given statement about GATT is true. The GATT was founded in 1947 to decrease barriers in global trade. "
"The "General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade" or GATT is a contract amongst countries, whose main motive was to foster worldwide trade by decreasing trade barriers like tariffs and quotas. The most necessary and effective fundamental rules incorporated in the GATT are the basic rules of "reciprocity'' and two "non-discrimination" rules, that are "Most Favored Nation", MFN and national treatment. GATT promotes the regulations of “rights” and “obligations”. It is nearly related with the MFN principles."
To learn more about GATT,
https://brainly.com/question/14618803
#SPJ1
Are these statements true or false? Give your opinions and explain the reason why:
1. Offers to enter into commercial contracts terminate when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
2. When the offeree replies that a part of the offer is accepted, the offeree shall be deemed to have made a new offer.
3. Remedy of fines and remedy of damages shall be applied concurrently
4. Time when written contracts are entered into is at the time when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
5. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of damages shall not be applied
6. The parties agreed that the fine level accounts for 8% of the contract value. This agreement is contrary to the provisions of law
7. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of fines shall be applied
8. Every contract for purchase and sale of goods between traders and traders is commercial contract.
9. The subjects of commercial contract for purchase and sale are the signers of contract
10. The aggrieved party shall bear the burden of proof of loss when requesting the breaching party to pay for damages.
Answer:
sorry I didn't have the answer ok I needed the points
what is it called when a suspect of an investigation pleads guilty
a. guilt plea
b. confession
c. homicide
d. attorney
Answer:
I believe the answer is a, guilt plea.
Which of the following is not usually a divisive issue in American politics?
Answer:
try looking it up
Explanatio
People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an expression of what kind of rights?
Answer:
People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an expression of what kind of rights?A) natural lawB) riparian rightsC) real property rightsD) strict liability rightsE) environmental rights
Explanation:
it's RIPARIAN RIGHTS
MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST THANK YOU
Select the best description of the mortgage note.
It commits you to paying your loan
It lists all costs associated with your loan
Answer:
The correct option is;
It commits you to paying your loan
Explanation:
A mortgage note is a note promising to repay a stipulated amount of money as well as interest incurred at a stipulated rate at an agreed time in order to live up to the terms of the promise
The mortgage note outlines the debt and the interest rate and requires the borrower, that is the signatory to the note individually responsible for the repayment of the mortgage
Therefore, the correct option is that it commits you to paying your loan.
The best description of the mortgage note is B. It lists all costs associated with your loan.
What is a mortgage note?A mortgage note is a promising note that stipulates the:
Amount of loan involved Interest rate and amount to be paid periodicallyMaturity period of the mortgage.Thus, while signing the mortgage note commits the borrower to pay off the loan with interest, the best description of the mortgage note is that it lists all costs associated with the loan.
Learn more about the mortgage note at https://brainly.com/question/1318711
Will give Brainlist, pls help, thank u
1. The Latin phrase caveat emptor means “let the buyer beware” and was the attitude regarding consumer law for much of history. How has modern consumer law and government agencies helped being aware as a consumer easier?
2. Federal law requires that all food labels contain the list of ingredients and nutritional information. What right of consumers is being covered with these laws? How do these requirements help protect consumers?
3. Explain the different types of contracts. How do contracts protect consumers?
4. For each scenario decide if a legal contract has been made and explain why or why not:
a. Jamal says to Mikel, “I’m going to sell my iPhone for $200. Mikel replies, “All right, here is the money. I’ll take it.” Jamal accepts the money.
b. Rachel offers Cherie $100 to steal a gold ring from a local store. Cherie steals the gold ring and brings it to Rachel and asks for the money.
c. Hiba purchases a package of meat from a grocery store. She opens it at home and finds the meat has spoiled. When she takes it back to the store for an exchange they refuse to exchange it. She says the store has a responsibility to replace it since they presented it as fresh.
The major way in which modern consumer law and government agencies has helped being aware as a consumer easier based on the Latin phrase caveat emptor is:
To let them become aware that a particular product is not for sale and that the prospective buyer should engage in due diligence.The right of consumers which is being covered with these laws of food labeling is:
Right to know what they are consumingThe way in which these requirements of food labeling help protect consumers is:
It helps them to know the nutritional content of what they are about to consume and also the ingredients to help them avoid possible allergies and other health risks.The different types of contracts are:
Fixed-price contract. ...Cost-reimbursement contract. ...Cost-plus contract. ...Time and materials contract. ...Unit price contract. ...Bilateral contract. ...Unilateral contract.The major way in which contracts protect consumers is:
It lets them contest the case in a law court if the agreement is broken.For each scenario decide if a legal contract has been made and explain why or why not:
A. Yes, a legal contract has been made because an agreement by word has been reached between Jamal and Mikel for the sale of his phoneB. No, a legal contract has not been made because the action which was negotiated is not a legally binding as it involves theft of an item.What is a Contract?This refers to a legally binding agreement between two or more parties where they agree to do or not to do something.
Read more about contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/984979
You're deprived of your typical lab equipment but need to detect
hydrocarbons in evidence. Which of the following tools would you
most likely be able to use to release traces of hydrocarbons?
O A cigarette lighter
O A refrigerator
O A fruit-drying machine
O A faucet
Answer:
Lighter is correct
Explanation:
it contains butane
Which ethical system or systems most reflect the thinking used by the court in this case
Answer:1
Explanation:
Do citizens care enough to actively participate in policymaking, or would any resources devoted to participatory processes be better directed toward implementation?
Citizens tend to care about policies that directly affect their daily lives, and they are more likely to participate in policymaking processes when they feel that their voices are being heard and that they can make a difference.
Participatory processes can be valuable in providing a space for citizens to voice their opinions, concerns, and ideas, and to work collaboratively with policymakers to develop more effective policies. However, these processes can also be time-consuming and resource-intensive, and may not always result in significant changes to policy outcomes.
Ultimately, it is important to strike a balance between participatory processes and implementation efforts. Policymakers need to consider the potential benefits of participatory processes, including increased community engagement and support for policies, against the costs of implementing such processes. Additionally, policymakers need to ensure that participatory processes are inclusive, accessible, and meaningful for all members of the community, including those who may not have traditionally been included in policy discussions.
To learn more about citizens here
https://brainly.com/question/11052165
#SPJ4
If an organization and an agency cannot reach a settlement on improper conduct under agency rules or regulations, then the next step is for the agency to a file a public complaint. b file an Article III action. c do nothing. d file a complaint with the local trial court.
If an organization and an agency cannot reach a settlement on improper conduct under agency rules or regulations, the next step is for the agency to file a public complaint. Filing a public complaint is the process through which the agency formally brings the matter to the attention of the public and initiates legal action against the organization.
A public complaint is typically filed with the relevant administrative body or governing authority responsible for overseeing the industry or sector in which the organization operates. This could be a regulatory agency, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for financial misconduct or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for environmental violations.
By filing a public complaint, the agency seeks to address the alleged improper conduct by presenting the case to a higher authority or court. The complaint outlines the specific violations and provides evidence to support the agency's claims against the organization. This initiates a formal legal process that allows for a thorough investigation and potential penalties or sanctions if the allegations are proven true.
For example, let's say an organization is accused of misleading advertising practices by making false claims about the effectiveness of their product. If the agency responsible for regulating advertising practices cannot reach a settlement with the organization, they would file a public complaint to bring the matter to the attention of the relevant authority, such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the United States. The FTC would then investigate the allegations, gather evidence, and potentially take legal action against the organization if the claims are substantiated.
In summary, when an organization and an agency cannot settle on improper conduct, the agency's next step is to file a public complaint to initiate legal action and seek resolution through a higher authority or court.
To know more about the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
https://brainly.com/question/14956213
#SPJ11
ENDANGERING OTHER PEOPLE ON A HIGHWAY WHILE YOU
ARE EXPERIENCING ROAD RAGE IS
Answer:
Aggressive driving has been a problem on our roadways for a while, and it seems to only be getting worse. Incidents of screaming, rude gestures, and sometimes even violence are reported frequently on our roadways to the point where it has earned its own name: road rage. Learn what causes road rage, whether you are prone to it, and how you can help to keep our roads safe by not giving in to road rage.