If Anton is charged with a crime and sued in a civil action, how would the civil case
differ from the criminal trial? Please explain.
Answers
Answer:NO
Explanation:
The correct answer is NO.
If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together because civil law doesn't involve criminal matters and procedures in civil and criminal trials are very different.
There are lawsuits for different cases, if Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.
What is civil action?
The civil action is a lawsuit for noncriminal actions that started with a complaint. this lawsuit usually involves private parties.
Since Anton's case is a criminal case, the case not be tried in a civil action because they don't involve criminal matters. Also, procedures in civil and criminal trials are different.
Therefore, If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.
Learn more on civil action here,
brainly.com/question/499624
Related Questions
If your long-term financial goal is to retire as a millionare and you plan to invest at least $200 per month for 40 years, what rate of return would keep you from ending up a millionare based on the Building Wealth Charts?
Answers
If your rate of return is below 9.221%, it would keep you from ending up a millionaire (with a future value of $1m) after investing $200 per month for 40 years.
How is the interest rate determined?The rate of return is the interest rate required to achieve a financial goal (having a future value of $1m), especially with periodic compounding.
For instance, if an investor deposits at least $200 per month for 40 years, and the interest rate is up to 9.221% or above, the investor becomes a millionaire.
However, if the interest rate falls below this threshold, the investor ends up not a millionaire.
We can compute the interest rate using an online finance calculator, set to the following parameters.
N (# of periods) = 480 months (40 years x 12)
PV (Present Value) = $0
PMT (Periodic Payment) = $200
FV (Future Value) = $1,000,000
Results:
I/Y = 9.221% if interest compounds 12 times per year (APR)
I/Y = 9.621% if interest compounds once per year (APY)
I/period = 0.768% interest per period
Sum of all periodic payments = $96,000 ($200 x 480)
Total Interest = $904,000.0
Thus, to end up a millionaire by investing $200 monthly for 40 years, the compounding rate of interest should be above 9.22%.
Learn more about the compounding interest rates at https://brainly.com/question/3989769
#SPJ1
Which courts hear the vast majority of cases in the United States?
Answers
The vast majority of all civil and criminal cases are filed in state courts. Sometimes a case can be filed under similar statutes in either state or federal court. There are 94 federal judicial districts. All but three of these districts have lifetime-appointed Article III judges.
A jury convicted two defendants for crimes involving the transportit
aliens. After the trial was over, the federal judge in the case enforced a court rule
that prohibited anyone from interviewing any juror, relative, friend, or associate
of the juror regarding the deliberations or verdict of the jury unless the person
can show good cause. Two weeks after the verdict, a newspaper publisher and
reporter filed a motion to get permission to interview the jurors for a news story.
The court denied the motion.
The publisher and reporter filed a lawsuit, claiming that they have a right under
freedom of the press to gather news and that the denial of access to interview the
jurors violates that constitutional right.
The court defends its ruling and its order not to grant permission by stating that,
like other First Amendment rights, the right to gather news is not absolute. The
purpose of prohibiting interviews of the jury is to protect jurors from annoyance
and harassment. Additionally, freedom of debate and independence of thought
would be stifled if jurors were made to feel that their arguments and ballots were
to be freely published to the public.
The law requires that restrictions of the press's news-gathering rights must be
justified by a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored to serve
that interest.
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. Who is the defendant?
3. What does the plaintiff want?
4. What does the defendant want?
5. What is the issue in this case?
What arguments does the plaintiff make?
Answers
The answer responses are:
The plaintiff in this case is the newspaper publisher and reporter.The defendant in this case is the court.The plaintiff wants permission to interview the jurors for a news story.The defendant wants to maintain its ruling and order not to grant permission to interview the jurors.The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff's right to gather news under the First Amendment of the US Constitution is being violated by the defendant's prohibition on interviewing jurors.What arguments does the plaintiff make?The plaintiff argues that they have a right under the freedom of the press to gather news and that the prohibition on interviewing jurors violates this right.
They may also argue that the prohibition is not justified by a compelling governmental interest and is not narrowly tailored to serve that interest, as required by law.
Therefore, the plaintiff may also argue that the prohibition is overly broad and unnecessarily restricts their ability to gather news.
Learn more plaintiff from
https://brainly.com/question/1463591
#SPJ1
5 scarves 2 of them are green if he chooses 1 scarf at random what is the probabillity its green write your answer as a fraction and a decimal
Answers
The total is 5 and then green ones are 2, so your fraction would be 2/5. Divide 2 and 5 to get .4.
Hope this helps
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answers
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
I bored boredom sucks! Who thinks Trump should’ve won?
Answers
Answer:
l-m-a-o i dont live in america so i dont care as long as your pres. doesnt start nuking everyone
Explanation:
*ABSURD OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS WILL BE REPORTED* Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
Suppose you are a defense attorney. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a criminal defendant testify at trial?
Answers
Answer:
As a juror, I hope that I would respect the defendant’s right not to testify. I realize that there are many reasons that someone might not want to testify in their own case beyond wanting to hide their guilt. For example, criminal cases sometimes involve complex legal arguments, and a defendant might be terrified that, although they are innocent, they might unwittingly say something that strengthens the case of the prosecution.
Explanation:
hehe hi
Criminal defense attorney is the lawyer that specialized in the army unit of peoples and companies bucked with criminal action.
What is the criminal defense attorney?A defense attorney is also called as a defense lawyer. He is an attorney, symbolising a suspect in a case or criminal prosecution.
Attorneys representing a suspect in a criminal suit and are officially called as “criminal defense attorneys".
A criminal defense attorney can support a person to voyage through the criminal justice system, prepare and assert the legal defense, and ensure that the people's rights are defended throughout the process.
Advantages and disadvantages of criminal defendant:
The advantages of the criminal defendant are:
The defendant may travel up with a lighter word string than if they had taken their chances with a court trial.There's a legal experience to the defendant.Due to the lower cost of the defendant, it is affordable by anyone.There is a familiarity between the lawyer and the clients.The disadvantages of the criminal defendant are:
Lack of Training and Knowledge.Inferior Argument Skills.Delays in taking the actions.Therefore, the criminal defense attorney symbolizes the suspect in the criminal cases.
Learn more about the defense attorney, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8134994
Someone else can drive your car if _____.
A. you have proof of residency
B. they have proof of insurance
C. they have proof of residency
D. you have proof of insurance
Answers
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.
What element is different about a corporate crime, as opposed to an occupational crime?
A. The crime is committed by the head of the company.
B.The crime affects more than a few people.
C.The crime involves a companywide policy.
D.The crime is a victimless crime.
Answers
County and city governments have no direct control over this part
of their budget, as it is a requirement of law.
Answers
The part of the budget that county and city governments have no direct control over as it is a requirement of law is: the debt service.
What is debt service?The repayment of the principal and interest on any loans or outstanding obligations that the government has undertaken is referred to as debt service. These debts are frequently issued to fund capital investments like public buildings or infrastructure projects.
Therefore, county and municipal governments are required by law to set aside a specific amount of their budget for debt service payments, and they have little leeway to change or lower those payments.
Learn more about debt service here:https://brainly.com/question/31325359
#SPJ1
if i had 2 cookies and a bully guy (lets name him bob) stole 1 cookie and already had 10 cookies and i left school that day with a big bag and 12 cookies what happend
Answers
Why do you think the Supreme Court has upheld restrictions on free speech under some circumstances, but overturned restrictions and others?
(this is a "what do you think?" question asked at the end of a passage about the Tinker v. De Moines case, if more information is needed to help answer the question please lmk)
Answers
Answer:
Perhaps to avoid people getting emotionally hurt?
Explanation:
Which of the following is true about common law?
A. It is the supreme law of the land in the United States.
B. It is made by the president and ratified by the Senate.
O C. It is authority to issue legal obligations on specific people or
companies.
O D. It is derived from customs and judicial decisions.
Answers
Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Common law refers to a legal system in which the law is primarily developed through judicial decisions, rather than through legislation or executive action. Hence option D is correct.
It is based on the principle of stare decisis, which means that previous court decisions serve as binding precedents for future cases. Common law is derived from customs and practices that have developed over time and is shaped by the rulings of judges in specific cases.
It is not the supreme law of the land in the United States; that distinction is held by the Constitution. Similarly, common law is not made by the president and ratified by the Senate, as that process pertains to statutory law.
Learn more about common law here
https://brainly.com/question/30328846
#SPJ6
5.The Supreme Court outlawed malapportionment because it
A.gives too much power to city dwellers
B.is unfair to minority groups
C.does not allow senators to represent enough people
D.does not give each citizen an equal voice in government
Answers
Malapportionment is the unequal distribution of voting power among voters or districts. In the case of the United States, it often refers to the unequal distribution of voters in legislative districts. The Supreme Court has ruled that such malapportionment is unconstitutional because it violates the principle of "one person, one vote" and does not give each citizen an equal voice in government. By outlawing malapportionment, the Court sought to ensure that each citizen's vote would have roughly equal weight and influence, regardless of where they live or which district they vote in.
Are there any people in our society who should not be held to the same standard by the law? if so, who? if not, why not?
Answers
Answer:
no because no person is above or under the law
which is the first language in the world
Answers
Answer:
Before 1000 BC
Date Language
c. 2600 BC Sumerian
c. 2400 BC Canaanite
c. 2400 BC Akkadian
c. 2400 BC Eblaite
Explanation:
I hope it's help u
Answer:
Sumerian language is known as the first language in the world
What might be the goals of convening a citizen police academy? Select all that apply. A. to improve the quality of public trust in the police department
B. to allow citizens to see firsthand the high level of training the department requires of every police officer
C. to enable citizens to understand that the actions of law enforcement are guided by local, state, and federal laws
D. to recruit citizens to become police officers
Answers
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
The answers go hand in hand. People will gain more trust in the police (A) if they see how they train (B) and if they see how law enforcement works (C). Also, more people might want to become police officers if they see how it benefits a community (D)
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
"How are both physical evidence and testimonial evidence used in a court of law?"
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Testimonial evidence is a statement made under oath; also known as direct evidence or prima facie evidence. Physical evidence is any object or material that is relevant in a crime; also known as indirect evidence. Examples are hair, fiber, fingerprints, documents, blood, soil, drugs, toolmarks, impressions, glass.
Which of the following is illegal in Florida?
A. changing your tire on the side of the road
B. turning on your hazard lights before you pull over
C. jump starting your car on the side of the road
D. placing reflective triangles around your car on the side of the road
Answers
1. Violations of public order or security
are classified as
Ofelonies
O civil law
O midemeanors
O criminal law
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Violations of public order or security are classified as criminal law.
felonies; civil law; misdemeanor; criminal law;
2. Crimes can be divided into the broad classes of misdemeanors & felonies. misdemeanors & felonies; civil & criminal; criminal & felonies; civil & misdemeanors;
3. Civil law deals with relations between individuals.
Civil; Criminal; Maritime; Litigation;
5. Identify the offices and institutions that make up each of the three branches of the federal
government. For each branch, give at least one example of how it can check the power
of another
branch of the federal government. (5 points)
Answers
Answer: Legislative—Makes laws (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate) Executive—Carries out laws (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies) Judicial—Evaluates laws (Supreme Court and other courts)
Explanation:
If a person's second DUI conviction is within five years of his or her first, __________.
Answers
There drivers licenses will be taken.
The Financial Responsibility Law requires you to carry extra insurance coverage if you _____.
A. earn less than 150% of minimum wage
B. cause an injury crash
C. have dependents, such as children
D. earn more than 150% of minimum wage
Answers
what your favorite food says about you
Answers
Answer:
says more about who you are as a person
Answer:
my favorite food is pasta
Explanation:
Which of the following is equivalent to the addition problem below?
35.54 + 81.94
Answers
Answer:
The answer is 117.48
Explanation:
35.54 + 81.94 = 117.48
Give five examples to help explain how sports and physical education overlaps
Answers
magic
more magick
even more magick
and more magic
What is the property of matter
Answers
Answer:
The properties of matter include any traits that can be measured, such as an object's density, color, mass, volume, length, malleability, melting point, hardness, odor, temperature, and more. ... Physical Properties: include size, shape, color, texture etc. The melting point and freezing point are also physical properties.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Have a good day/night
please help with accounting balance sheet
year ends on 28 Feb 2023
Answers
Answer:
Your picture is unclear