can a scientific theory be modified?? agree or not and be sure to add evidence thank you!!!! will give brainliest to whoever does it correct what i asked
Answers
Explanation:
As additional scientific evidence is gathered, a scientific theory may be modified and ultimately rejected if it cannot be made to fit the new findings; in such circumstances, a more accurate theory is then required If experimental results contrary to a theory's predictions are observed, scientists first evaluate whether the experimental design was sound, and if so they confirm the results by independent replication. A search for potential improvements to the theory then begins. Solutions may require minor or major changes to the theory, or none at all if a satisfactory explanation is found within the theory's existing framework.[18] Over time, as successive modifications build on top of each other, theories consistently improve and greater predictive accuracy is achieved. Since each new version of a theory (or a completely new theory) must have more predictive and explanatory power than the last, scientific knowledge consistently becomes more accurate over time.
If modifications to the theory or other explanations seem to be insufficient to account for the new results, then a new theory may be required. Since scientific knowledge is usually durable, this occurs much less commonly than modification.[16] Furthermore, until such a theory is proposed and accepted, the previous theory will be retained. This is because it is still the best available explanation for many other phenomena, as verified by its predictive power in other contexts. For example, it has been known since 1859 that the observed perihelion precession of Mercury violates Newtonian mechanics,[19] but the theory remained the best explanation available until relativity was supported by sufficient evidence. Also, while new theories may be proposed by a single person or by many, the cycle of modifications eventually incorporates contributions from many different scientists.[20]
After the changes, the accepted theory will explain more phenomena and have greater predictive power (if it did not, the changes would not be adopted); this new explanation will then be open to further replacement or modification. If a theory does not require modification despite repeated tests, this implies that the theory is very accurate. This also means that accepted theories continue to accumulate evidence over time, and the length of time that a theory (or any of its principles) remains accepted often indicates the strength of its supporting evidence.
Related Questions
What do you think makes a particular action a crime ?
Answers
Explanation:
The elements of a crime are criminal act, criminal intent, concurrence, causation, harm, and attendant circumstances. Only crimes that specify a bad result have the elements of causation and harm.
What kind of lawyer was John Glover Roberts Jr? PLS PLS HELP
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
American lawyer and jurist who serves as the chief justice of the United States.
I hope this helps ;)
what has contributed to a decline in compromise in Congress? *
Answers
Hurry, I'll give you brainliest
Many who have experienced mediation say that they have more control over the resolution. Which of the following statements best explains that sentiment?
I thought I was 100 percent right, and mediation taught me that there are two sides and there are ways of solving disagreements.
Mediation is confidential.
Mediation also works in businesses, in commercial disputes, in neighborhood disagreements. It is great!
Mediation is achieved by legal professionals that assist two or more persons to reach a settlement.
Answers
I thought I was 100 percent right, and mediation taught me that there are two sides and there are ways of solving disagreements. Option A
What statement does many who have experienced mediation say?In the mediation process, an unbiased third party helps the disputing parties communicate and negotiate so they can reach a settlement that is acceptable to both parties.
During this process, the parties have the opportunity to express their own needs and perspectives while also hearing out and taking into account the opinions of others.
Learn more about mediation:https://brainly.com/question/30160384
#SPJ1
How many hours do teachers work a day?
Answers
Answer:
They Work 8 hours a day
Explanation:
trust me
Your credit limit is $300 You don’t pay your card off each month like you should. What is the max you should ever owe on this card? $
Answers
The maximum amount you should ever owe on the card is $90.
If your credit limit is $300 and you don't pay off your card balance in full each month, it is generally recommended to keep your credit utilization ratio below 30%. The credit utilization ratio is the percentage of your available credit that you are using.
To calculate the maximum amount you should owe on the card, multiply your credit limit by 0.30 (30%):
$300 * 0.30 = $90
Based on this calculation, the maximum amount you should ever owe on the card is $90. This ensures that your credit utilization ratio remains below 30%, which is considered a good practice for maintaining a healthy credit score.
It's important to note that carrying a high balance on your credit card can lead to increased interest charges and potential negative effects on your credit score.
It's generally advisable to pay off your credit card balance in full each month to avoid accruing interest and to maintain good financial habits.
For such more question on card:
https://brainly.com/question/29587937
#SPJ8
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
explain five relationship between separation of power and checks and balances
Answers
The relationship between the separation of powers and checks and balances is Mutual Restraint, Legislative Oversight, Judicial Review, Appointment and Confirmation, and Lawmaking Process.
The separation of powers is the division of government authority into three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial, each with distinct functions and responsibilities. Checks and balances, on the other hand, refer to the system that ensures no single branch becomes too powerful by providing mechanisms for the branches to restrain or oversee one another.
Here are five key relationships between these concepts:
Mutual Restraint: The separation of powers creates independent branches that can act as a check on the others. For example, the legislative branch can pass laws, but the executive branch can veto them. This ensures that no single branch can dominate or misuse its authority.Legislative Oversight: The separation of powers grants the legislative branch the power to oversee the executive branch through mechanisms such as hearings and investigations. This enables Congress to hold the executive branch accountable for its actions and decisions.Judicial Review: The judiciary, as part of the separation of powers, has the authority to interpret and apply laws. Through judicial review, the courts can check the actions of the legislative and executive branches to ensure they align with the Constitution and established legal principles.Appointment and Confirmation: The separation of powers requires the cooperation of different branches in the appointment and confirmation process. For instance, the executive branch nominates judges and officials, but the legislative branch confirms these appointments, acting as a check on executive power.Lawmaking Process: The separation of powers and checks and balances affect the lawmaking process. The legislative branch proposes and passes laws, while the executive branch can veto them. However, the legislative branch can override the veto with a supermajority vote. This interplay ensures that no single branch has absolute control over the legislative agenda.know more about legislative here:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ8
Summary and conclusion of computer forensic
Answers
19. Who was an important leader in the women's suffrage movement? (1 point)
Answers
Answer:
Susan B. Anthony, Alice Paul, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucy Stone and Ida B. Wells
In 1906, there was a small population of deer on the Kaibab Plateau. Because cows had overgrazed the food on the Kaibab Plateau, the Forest Service decided to create a preserve on the Kaibab Plateau for the deer. In the preserve, the cows and the natural predators of the deer were removed. In 1920, the Forest Service discovered that the number of deer in the preserve was very large. By 1923, most of the deer were starving from a lack of food.
Which statement best describes what happened on the Kaibab Plateau between 1906 and 1923?
Answers
The statement that describes what happened on the Kaibab Plateau between 1906 and 1923 was: overgrazing by cows caused the deer on the Kaibab Plateau to starve.
What impacted deer population on the Kaibab Plateau between 1906 and 1923?The Forest Service had created a preserve on the plateau to protect the deer, removing cows and predators, However, because of absence of natural predators and continued growth of the deer population, the plateau's resources were eventually overtaxed which leads to mass starvation.
The overgrazing by cows prior to the creation of the preserve likely contributed to the lack of sufficient food for the deer population. This event highlights the delicate balance of ecosystems and the potential unintended consequences of human intervention.
Read more about Kaibab Plateau
brainly.com/question/16392410
#SPJ1
Can someone write a three page essay on how Adnan Syed is Guilty of conviction from being a serial killer using detail
Answers
Answer:
Syed fue declarado culpable de matar a Hae Min Lee.
Explicación:
En 1999, Syed fue declarado culpable de matar a Hae Min Lee, su ex novia y compañera de clase, y fue condenado a cadena perpetua durante 30 años. En el momento de su asesinato, tanto Adnan Syed como Hae Min Lee eran estudiantes de último año en Woodlawn High School en Baltimore. Lee desapareció el 13 de enero de 1999 y su cuerpo medio enterrado fue encontrado después de cuatro semanas en un parque de la ciudad cercana. El estrangulamiento manual es la principal causa de su muerte. En febrero de 2000, Syed fue declarado culpable de asesinato y condenado a cadena perpetua de 30 años. Syed nunca ha confesado su crimen y ha mantenido su inocencia. No hay evidencia ante el tribunal por el asesinato de Hae Min Lee. Fue capturado por la confesión del amigo de Syed, Jay Wilds, sobre el secuestro y asesinato de Hae Min Lee. Syed ganó prominencia en 2014 cuando Sarah Koenig lanzó el podcast Serial para reexaminar su caso, pero el juez del tribunal de circuito Martin Welch anuló su condena en 2016.
Mose was born with fetal alcohol syndrome. He lived in unstable conditions until the age of nine. His housing was inadequate and he was exposed to environmental hazards, including lead. His diet was poor until he was removed from his home. He spent the rest of his childhood in foster care. His health improved, but he was diagnosed with mild intellectual disability. Mose struggled in school and finally stopped going. He likes to work, but he is easily led astray, and this gets him into trouble. For example, local teenage boys told him he could join their “gang” if he stole money from the cash register where he worked and gave it to them. This led to his first arrest.
How might these challenges make Mose more likely to break the law?
How might these challenges make Mose more likely to be victimized?
What services might help Mose avoid involvement with the criminal justice system?
Answers
How might these challenges make Mose more likely to be victimized? In court a Jury and the judge are going to see what went wrong in his life, a lawyer is going to use that as their defense which honestly isn’t a bad thing I personally don’t think the kid needs to be in jail I think he should be put in a rehab, sent to a therapist or someone that could help him
What services might help Mose avoid involvement with the criminal justice system? No services can keep him out of the system but they will help, unless they are keeping him in a program that he is at everyday and he is staying there nothing can keep him out of the system, he is going to choose what he wants to do at the end of the day, but he could for example go to like I said before therapy, rehab, if under 18 back to foster care, it would probably be up to the court if the company presses charges. I personally think a judge would not make him spend any time in jail, Juvie, prison I think they would instead realize that he needs a support system and needs someone to guide and help him, I know that’s what I would choose to do with him if I was the judge
Mose's challenges make him more likely to break the law in a number of ways. First, his fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) can cause learning and behavioral problems, which can make it difficult for him to understand the consequences of his actions.
Second, learning and behavioral issues may result from his exposure to environmental dangers like lead. Third, his early life living conditions and poor diet may have led to his mild intellectual handicap, which might make it challenging for him to appreciate the repercussions of his choices and act responsibly.
Additionally, Mose might have felt like he didn't belong anywhere and that no one was looking out for him as a result of his erratic living arrangements and his time spent in foster care. This could increase his propensity to seek out harmful influences, like the young men who promised him he could join their gang if he stole money from the register.
The difficulties Mose faces also increase his risk of being harmed. His moderate intellectual handicap, cognitive, and behavioral issues, along with his FAS, can give the impression that he would be an easy target for predators. In addition, he might have felt helpless and vulnerable due to his erratic living arrangements and his time spent in foster care.
Numerous services exist that could assist Mose in keeping out of the criminal justice system. These services could consist of:
Support for learning: Mose could use tutoring or other educational support services to get caught up in class and acquire the knowledge he needs to succeed.
Mose could gain from behavioral treatment if he wanted to improve his ability to control his emotions and make wiser judgments.
To know more about law:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ2
s
Question 13
The new redesigned UCR is called the
A. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics
ms
B. Offender-Based Trasaction Statistics
C. National Criminal Victimization Survey
O D. National Incident-Based Reporting System
Answers
Answer:
D. National Incident-Based Reporting System.
Explanation:
The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) is a program of the federal government of the United States of America that was launched in 1929.
The main purpose of the UCR is to gather and compile informations on crimes that were committed and reported to the law enforcement agencies in the United States of America.
Generally, the federal bureau of intelligence (FBI) are saddled with the responsibility of publishing these crime statistics reports in the United States of America.
This ultimately implies that, the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) measures the most serious crimes in the United States of America, also referred to as Part I crimes.
The new redesigned Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) is called the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). It took a five (5) year redesign effort to transform the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) program into the more comprehensive and well-detailed National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).
Help please would mean a lot
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation: B because they can detonate easily when subjected to heat and friction.
3. The U.S. government is divided into three branches. What is this an example of? (1 point)
Ofederalism
O interpretation
Oseparation of power
Oconfederate system
Answers
how do I say apple In Spanish
Answers
\(ANSWER\)
English - Spanish
Apple - Manzana
~hope it helps~
What are the Core Beliefs of the Socialist party
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Socialist Feminism and Women's Liberation
Liberation of Oppressed People
International Solidarity & Peace
Internal Democracy
Cultural Freedom
The Personal as Political
Electoral Action
Democratic Revolution From Below
Mikel’s dental insurance will pay up to 80 percent of the cost of a root canal and 50 percent of the cost of the crown. However, overall coverage is limited to $1,000 in total payments. Assuming the root canal will cost $1,200 and the crown will cost $1,000, how much will Mikel have to pay to get his tooth fixed?
Mikel’s dental insurance will pay up to 80 percent of the cost of a root canal and 50 percent of the cost of the crown. However, overall coverage is limited to $1,000 in total payments. Assuming the root canal will cost $1,200 and the crown will cost $1,000, how much will Mikel have to pay to get his tooth fixed?
Answers
The amount that Mikel have to pay to get his tooth fixed is $1,200.
What is an insurance?Insurance is a tool for risk management. You purchase protection against unforeseen financial losses when you purchase insurance. If something bad happens to you, the insurance company pays you or someone else of your choosing. If an accident occurs and you don't have insurance, you might be liable for all associated expenses.
In this case, Mikel’s dental insurance will pay up to 80 percent of the cost of a root canal and 50 percent of the cost of the crown. However, overall coverage is limited to $1,000 in total payments. Since the root canal will cost $1,200, he will be responsible for the whole amount.
Learn more about insurance on:
https://brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ1
9. Choose the best answer.
Who are the individuals providing limited healthcare during medical situations?
police officers
paramedics
firefighters
emergency medical technicians
Answers
The individuals providing limited healthcare during medical situations are usually emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Therefore option no 4 is correct.
EMTs are skilled to offer basic hospital treatment, including administering CPR, treating wounds, and stabilizing patients before shipping to a clinic.
Paramedics have more advanced education and are capable of provide a wider range of medical interventions, which include administering medicinal drugs, inserting respiratory tubes, and defibrillating the coronary heart.
Cops and firefighters may provide restrained hospital treatment in emergency situations, such as supporting with first aid or acting CPR till EMTs or paramedics arrive. but, their primary roles are usually targeted on law enforcement or firefighting, respectively, in preference to healthcare.
Learn more about emergency medical technicians
https://brainly.com/question/26147244
#SPJ1
Which of these is the strongest example of multilateral foreign policy? 'O One nation states publicly that it will refuse to trade with any nation that criticizes its leader. One nation refuses to trade with a rival nation because it does not allow women to vote in an upcoming election. O Two rival nations go to war with one another over disputed territory. O Two allied nations enforce economic sanctions on a country until its government changes a key policy.
Answers
Answer:
Two allied nations enforce economic sanctions on a country until its government changes a key policy.
Explanation
took the test its correct
The strongest example of multilateral foreign policy is two allied nations enforcing economic sanctions on a country until its government changes a key policy.
What is foreign policy?Foreign policy refers to those objectives that guide the activities and relationships of one state to another state.
The strongest example of multilateral foreign policy is two allied nations enforcing economic sanctions on a country until its government changes a key policy.
Therefore, D is the correct option.
Learn more about Foreign policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/11248576
#SPJ5
What are 5 of the 8 "Roadblocks to Understanding?"
Answers
Answer:
I found a quizlet with the answers in it
Explanation:
What is the impact of incorporation?
a The Supreme Court has included local court judges to help rule on certain cases..
b The Supreme Court has applied certain rights from the Bill of Rights to the state governments.
c The Supreme Court has requested that appeals lawyers combine similar cases into one review.
d The Supreme Court has determined that its rulings will only apply to the state in which the case began.
Answers
What are the thoughts on the 2nd amendment and gun control
Answers
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right of Americans to bear arms, and this has been a contentious issue in the ongoing debate on gun control in the country.
What does amendment mean?An amendment is a modification or addition to a written agreement or another instrument. A common definition of an amendment is an "addition or correction that largely preserves the original document."
Some people believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to own and carry firearms, and any attempts to restrict access to guns are an infringement of their constitutional rights.
They argue that owning a gun is a form of self-defense and that law-abiding citizens should have the right to protect themselves and their property.
Others argue that the Second Amendment was intended to allow for a well-regulated militia and that gun ownership should be subject to reasonable regulations to ensure public safety.
They argue that the easy availability of firearms has led to an epidemic of gun violence in the country, and stricter gun control laws are necessary to prevent further tragedies.
Learn more about amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ9
How might reading about a case or hearing about it on TV influence jurors?
Answers
Answer:
it may prejudice the potential jurors against the defendant
Did you know anything about Gerrymandering? Was any of this information surprising to you? Why or why not?
Answers
Gerrymandering is the practice of redrawing election districts to favour a certain political party. Although the magnitude and effect may not be shocking, they often are.
I am aware of gerrymandering, which is the act of influencing an election constituency's borders in order to favour one political party or organisation over another. This is done to make sure that the ruling party can continue to win most of the elections.
This did not come as a surprise to me considering that gerrymandering has long been a contentious topic in many nations, including the US. Even yet, the amount to which it is applied and the effects it has on representation and democracy may be surprising.
Learn more about Gerrymandering:
https://brainly.com/question/29553293
#SPJ1
why was trump impeached
Answers
Answer:
Trump has been charged with incitement of insurrection after hundreds of supporters stormed the US Capitol in protest of the 2020 presidential election result.
Explanation:
Answer:
He was impeached because Antifa posed as republicans and stormed the capital building. Then the media blamed his supports on the few who actually went into the building.
the governor appoints someone to the FREC then the Senate rejects the appointment, what happens next?
Answers
Through its advice and consent clause, the Appointments Clause grants the President the authority to propose candidates and grants the Senate full authority to accept or reject a nomination.
What happens once the governor names someone to the FREC and the Senate rejects that appointment?
The president appoints the governor of a state, who holds office for a five-year period at his discretion. The only people who may be appointed to this post are Indian citizens who are at least 35 years old. The Governor is vested with the power to serve as the state's executive.
appointment of governors A warrant designating the governor of a state must be signed and sealed by the President. Paragraph 156. Term of office for the governor: While the President is in office, the Governor will continue to function.
A power of appointment is an idea that has its roots in British common law. It is the ability under law to give another person ownership of a deceased person's property.
Learn more about appointment process:
https://brainly.com/question/29545676
#SPJ1
Which statement about the “divine right of kings” theory is FALSE? A. Its followers viewed kings as the fathers of society. B. Its adherents believed that government was critical to the “Great Chain of Being.” C. It held that submission to the patriarchal authority was the key to political obligation. D. Its followers believed that governments should be modeled after the ancient Greek and Roman governments.
Answers
Answer:
D. Its followers believed that governments should be modeled after the ancient Greek and Roman governments.
Explanation:
The theory of "divine rights of kings" was based on the supremacy of the kings over everyone else, including the church or religious beliefs. Therefore, they are exempted from any obligation, and even free from being held accountable for their actions.
Among the many theories about this right, one of the false beliefs is that the followers of this theory believed in the need for governments to be modeled after the ancient Greek and Roman governments. This divine authority was an ancient fundamental principle of the Egyptians, who believed kings to be the fathers of society. They are directly appointed by the gods to rule, thus held no earthly responsibility or are to be subjected to any political or religious accounts. And it is thus deemed a great sin to revolt or express any dissension or rebellion against such God-ordained rulers.
Answer:
In short, D.
Explanation:
The president's primary job is to enforce the laws passed by
b.
d.
the legislative branch
the Supreme Court
the President's Cabinet
the EOP
Answers
Answer:
the legislative branch