Answer:
Use a separate single-cable phone line not part of the buildings main phone system, Place the telephone wire into a metal conduit, and having the cable enter/exit the building at the lowest level of the building.
Explanation:
Are unjust laws binding on the people in your opinion?
Answer:
In my opinion I think so because what happened to our rights and people that don't obey the law should be the one's to pay for it not us.
hope this helps
have a good day :)
Explanation:
2 sides of attorneys: The prosecution and the defense. Which
would you be best at and why if you were to choose law as a
profession? Include an explanation of the role/duties of each
within your answe
If I were to choose law as a profession, I believe I would excel as a defense attorney.
As a defense attorney, my strengths would align with the ability to advocate for the rights and interests of individuals accused of crimes. The role of a defense attorney is to provide legal representation to defendants and ensure their rights are protected throughout the legal process. This involves conducting thorough investigations, analyzing evidence, building a strong defense strategy, and representing clients in court. As a defense attorney, I would work closely with clients to understand their perspective, gather relevant information, and challenge the prosecution's case against them. I would use my analytical skills to identify weaknesses in the prosecution's arguments, present counterarguments, and strive for the best possible outcome for my clients.
While both sides, prosecution and defense, play vital roles in the legal system, I believe my strengths and values are better suited to defending individuals. The role of a defense attorney aligns with my passion for ensuring fairness, protecting individual rights, and providing a voice for those who may be marginalized or facing challenging circumstances. It requires empathy, strong communication skills, critical thinking, and a commitment to upholding justice. By serving as a defense attorney, I would have the opportunity to make a meaningful impact in the lives of my clients and contribute to the overall fairness and integrity of the legal system.
To know more about prosecution, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30037299
#SPJ11
Jamar and Natasha had the following income and expenses for 2021:
$45,000 in wages.
$24,000 in rental income.
$8,000 in rental expenses.
$48,000 in self-employment receipts.
$12,000 in self-employment expenses.
Assuming there are no income adjustments, what is their California gross income?
A $97,000
B $105,000
C $109,000
D $117,000
The California gross income of Jamar and Natasha is $97,000. The correct response is option (A).
Define California gross income.Gross income in California includes what you are paid as a salary and wages, as well as gratuities, pensions, interest, and dividends that are taxed, capital gains from mutual funds (on Form 1099-DIV, Box 2a).
Gross income is the total of all earnings, profits, interest payments, rent, and other sources of income that families and individuals get before any deductions or taxes. It differs from net income, which is calculated by deducting from gross income all applicable taxes and other deductions.
The income portion of the federal form 1040 is duplicated here. There are no more changes to CA 540NR. Jamar and Natasha's combined gross income in California is therefore $97,000.
To know more about California gross income, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28879319
#SPJ1
if a person has been found liable for a civil penalty in a hearing that ruling can be entered as a judgement and enforced after
It is TRUE if a person has been found liable for a civil penalty in a hearing, that ruling can be entered as a judgment and enforced afterward.
Once a hearing or trial has concluded, and a person has been found liable for a civil penalty, the court or administrative body can enter a judgment based on the ruling. This judgment formalizes the decision and establishes the legal obligation to pay the civil penalty. With the entry of the judgment, the prevailing party can then pursue enforcement actions to collect the penalty amount. This may involve various methods such as garnishing wages, placing liens on property, or seeking other appropriate remedies allowed by law. The ability to enter and enforce a judgment provides a mechanism for ensuring compliance with the ruling and the payment of the civil penalty.
To know more about civil penalty
brainly.com/question/31558700
#SPJ11
what is a maggot trail what does this tell investigators
A maggot trail is a trail of maggots that are left behind by insects that feed on decomposing flesh. When a body starts to decompose, it releases a gas that attracts these insects, which lay their eggs on the body.
The eggs then hatch into maggots, which feed on the flesh and leave a trail behind as they move across the body.
Maggot trails can tell investigators a lot about a crime scene.
For example, the presence of a maggot trail can indicate that a body has been moved from one location to another, as the trail will show where the body has been dragged or carried.
It can also give investigators an idea of the time of death, as the rate at which maggots move and feed is influenced by factors such as temperature and humidity.
In addition, maggots can also provide valuable forensic evidence. They can be analyzed to determine the type of insect that laid the eggs, which can help identify the location and timing of the death. They can also be tested for DNA, which can help identify the victim or suspect.
Overall, maggot trails are an important piece of evidence in forensic investigations and can provide valuable information to help solve crimes.
Know more about the maggot trail here:
https://brainly.com/question/31631096
#SPJ11
Alfonso plays basketball for Hope County High School. His team makes it to the state tournament, where they play their
archrival, Duvall County High. After an intense game where tempers run high, the Hope County team wins. While walking
home from the basketball game, Alfonso is confronted by George, a member of the Duvall County team. George pushes
Alfonso, causing him to fall to the ground. Enraged, Alfonso pulls a gun from his gym bag and shoots George in the chest,
killing him instantly. Alfonso is arrested and charged with murder. Alfonso claims he shot George in self-defense. At trial,
Alfonso's claim of self-defense is likely to be:
Answer:
"I shot him because he assaulted me and I felt threatened" Make sure to put the answer in quotations
Explanation:
His claim of self-defense is likely to be "I shot him because he assaulted
me and I felt threatened because he pushed me to the ground"
What is Self-defense?This is a countermeasure which involves individuals protecting
themselves against harm.
Alfonso was assaulted and felt threatened which was why he acted in self-
defense by shooting George.
Read more about Self-defense here https://brainly.com/question/2920735
In order for a punishment to be "cruel and unusual" it must be "grossly disproportionate" to the crime committed.
А
True
B False
Answer:
b False
Explanation:
what section of some contracts could relieve a party from tort liability? O An exculpatory clause O A non-competition clause O The commerce clause O The takings clause
The section of some contracts that could relieve a party from tort liability is an "exculpatory clause."
An exculpatory clause, also known as a limitation of liability clause or a waiver of liability clause, is a contractual provision that seeks to release one party from liability for their own negligent acts or omissions. These clauses are often included in contracts to protect businesses or individuals from potential liability claims arising from accidents, injuries, or other tortious conduct. By including an exculpatory clause in a contract, one party may attempt to limit or eliminate their responsibility for any harm or damages caused to the other party, even if it results from their negligence.
It is important to note that the enforceability and validity of exculpatory clauses can vary depending on jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. Some jurisdictions may restrict or invalidate exculpatory clauses in certain situations, such as cases involving gross negligence, intentional misconduct, or violations of public policy.
To read more about Exculpatory Clause click here
https://brainly.com/question/27222495
#SPJ11
if you were the chairman of Nepal Disabled women Association what plan would you make for the Disabled women's welfare and make them independent? prepare a detail plan.
Answer:
1 :Provide vocational training to make them independent.
2:Give them support.
3:Conduct awareness programmes.
4: As a chairperson I will try as much as I can provide them their rights.
5: Provide decision makin power.
6: Leverage technology to develop skills.
7: Provide training to improve the required skills for independence.
8: Consider options for learning, employment or volunteering.
emergence of federalism in Nigeria
Answer:
Bernard Bourdillon the Governor-general at that time initiated and laid the foundation of federalism in Nigeria in 1939 by creating three provinces. From 1901 to 1958, the number of regions was increased to three through both acquisition of territories and partition from existing provinces.
Explanation:
Bernard Bourdillon the Governor-general at that time initiated and laid the foundation of federalism in Nigeria in 1939 by creating three provinces. From 1901 to 1958, the number of regions was increased to three through both acquisition of territories and partition from existing provinces.
Hope this helped.
which of the following, if true of an offender, is likely to be a reason for probation to be denied?
If an offender is addicted to Narcotics, then this can be a reason for his/her probation to be denied.
What is Probation?
An offender serves out a criminal sentence on probation rather than serving time in jail. It is a period during which a criminal offender is under the supervision of a correctional officer, typically a probation officer. A probation officer supervises probation and parole and assists the offender in making various adjustments as they reintegrate into society following incarceration Typically, the court presiding over the case will grant probation. Probation is frequently given for non-violent crimes. Also, when a first-time violation occurs, probation is more likely to be given.
Therefore, Probation is likely to be denied if a person is addicted to narcotics.
To know more about Probation, click on the link given below:
https://brainly.com/question/28764733
#SPJ4
Under Massachusetts law, second degree murders are
Under Massachusetts law, second-degree murder is defined as the intentional killing of another person that is not premeditated or committed with extreme atrocity or cruelty.
What does Massachusetts law say of murder ?In Massachusetts, first-degree murder is reserved for killings that are premeditated or committed with extreme atrocity or cruelty, while second-degree murder is a less severe offense. Second-degree murder is still considered a very serious crime and can carry significant criminal penalties, including life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after 15 years.
Under Massachusetts law, the prosecution must prove that the defendant intentionally caused the death of another person, but not that the killing was premeditated or involved extreme atrocity or cruelty.
Find out more on second degree murders at https://brainly.com/question/13097311
#SPJ1
Reporters are protected from retaliation under which law.
Reporters are protected from retaliation under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects freedom of the press, as well as various federal and state laws.
One such federal law is the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), which protects federal employees who disclose information that they reasonably believe constitutes evidence of a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or gross mismanagement, waste of funds, abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.
In addition, the Privacy Protection Act (PPA) provides limited protection against searches and seizures of journalists' materials, including notes and photographs, in connection with criminal investigations.
Finally, some states have their own shield laws, which protect journalists from being forced to reveal their sources or unpublished information in court proceedings.
It is important to note that the exact protections offered by these laws may vary depending on the circumstances and jurisdiction involved.
To learn more about Reporters here
https://brainly.com/question/27937774
#SPJ4
An individual wants to sue an agency in a federal court to stop its action. Rank the actions they can take from first to last, placing the first action at the top of the list the top of the list. Top label: null
Answer:
Our government places a high priority on the public being allowed to speak their minds about elected officials as well as other public figures. People in the public eye get less protection from defamatory statements and face a higher burden when attempting to win a defamation lawsuit.
When an official is criticized in a false and injurious way for something that relates to their behavior in office, the official must prove all of the above elements associated with normal defamation, and must also show that the statement was made with "actual malice."
"Actual malice" was defined in a U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1988, Hustler v. Falwell. In that case, the court held that certain statements that would otherwise be defamatory were protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
This meant that public officials could only win a defamation suit when the statement that was made wasn't an honest mistake and was in fact published with the actual intent to harm the public figure. Actual malice only occurs when the person making the statement knew the statement was not true at the time the statement was made or had a reckless disregard for whether it was true or not.
For other people that are in the public eye, such as celebrities, they too must prove that the defamatory statements were made with actual malice.
hope it helps
How will law enforcement officers interact with the community they serve in the year 2030?
hope they leave us alone
Ned is a registered nurse who gains a certification to identify and interpret injuries for violent causes. Which type of certification has he gained?
A.
CCI
B.
CMI
C.
ACFEI
D.
CFN
E.
ABFA
Answer:
acfel
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
absolutely not
Corporations may underreport cybercrimes because of concerns about data breach liabilities, damage to brand, regulatory issues, and loss of consumer confidence.
A. True
B. False
It is completely appropriate and correct to mention that the corporations may underreport cybercrime, because of concerns about data breach liabilities, damage to brand, regulatory issues, and loss of consumer confidence. Therefore, the statement given above holds true.
What is the significance of cybercrime?A cybercrime can be referred to or considered as a form of criminal activity that takes place over the internet using a computer or a network of computers. Such crimes are handled by a completely different department of police authorities.
There have been instances where the plaintiffs have underreported their cybercrime, as they are concerned about the breach of their private data and confidential information.
Therefore, the option A holds true and states regarding the significance of a cybercrime.
Learn more about cybercrime here:
https://brainly.com/question/28836591
#SPJ12
evaluate to what the religious organizations have or currently supporting communities affected by human trafficking
Trafficking Prevention and Intervention Organizations
1. CAST-Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking
2. Center for Human Trafficking Awareness
3. Justice Planning Management Associates
If this helped, please give it brainliest!
A four-page description of the operations management principles that were used during the project (the group's perspective), as well as those operations management principles that were actually implemented by the community child fare non profit organisation based on the following proposal; project management, aggregate planning, forecasting, administration and Human Resources management.
Nonprofit Community Child Fares Management is the appropriate heading.
Introduction: A local child feeding organisation ran this four-page review. Group opinion and corporate operations. Administration, HR, project, aggregate, and forecasting matter.
Project management made the group successful. Tasks, schedule, and progress. Teamwork, communication, and meetings were emphasised.
Assess the local kid food non-profit's project management. They planned? Project goals? Project updates? These variables evaluate the company's project management.
The group stated aggregate planning helped the project. Optimising volunteers, supplies, and facilities. The committee analysed cost, capacity, and demand.
Aggregate planning analyses the organization's kid lunch event resource allocation. Demand forecasts affected event planning? Space, materials, volunteers? Demand and resource adjustments anticipated? Company plans.
Forecasting mattered. Demand predicts attendance, resources, and money. Decision-making was informed by forecasting and data analysis.
Company expectations require kid fare demand estimates. Or history? Their forecasts assisted resource planning? Demand and attendance influenced their approaches. These indicators forecast.
Administration: The committee liked project management. Documentation, finance, and logistics were highlighted. Prioritised transparency, responsibility, and standards.
The kid fare event checks the organization's documentation, financial management, and logistics. Clear accounting? Finances regulated? Venue, ticket, and vendor logistics efficient? These show management.
HRM: Project success needs good HRM. They recruited, trained, motivated, and retained. Duties and evaluation were highlighted.
HR assessment requires volunteer recruiting, training, and retention. They planned? Volunteer training? Volunteers valued? Volunteer ratings? These show HR's capabilities.
Conclusion: This four-page short addressed operations management basics.
Learn more about operations management principles, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29440725
#SPJ4
Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full questions was,
What are 4 fundamental principles in operations management?
Write a four-page description of the operations management principles that were used during the project (the group's perspective), as well as those operations management principles that were actually implemented by the community child fare non profit organisation based on the following proposal; project management, aggregate planning, forecasting, administration and Human Resources management.
Write a short note on the following classificatiin of law
1 case law
2 civil law
3 criminal law
4 public law
Answer:
the civil and crimal law.
Explanation:
supremacy clause definition
The Supremacy Clause is a provision in the US Constitution that establishes the federal government's authority over state governments.
The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI of the US Constitution, establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land.
This means that in cases of conflict between state and federal law, the federal law takes precedence and must be followed. The Supremacy Clause is important because it helps to prevent inconsistencies in the legal system and ensures that federal law is consistently applied throughout the country.
The Supremacy Clause has been invoked in many landmark court cases, such as McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden, to establish the federal government's power over state governments in areas such as taxation, commerce, and civil rights.
It also serves as a critical safeguard of individual rights, as it ensures that the US Constitution and federal laws take precedence over any conflicting state laws or regulations. Overall, the Supremacy Clause is a crucial component of the US legal system, helping to maintain consistency and order in the country.
To know more about Supremacy Clause click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13839329#
#SPJ11
what causes the object that moves along a surface to slow down and eventually stop
How does the government of a traditional new England small town differ from the government of a large modern city
why does a party file interrogatories
Answer:
to learn more detail about the other partys case
Explanation:
just took test and got it right
After your case is reviewed by the District Court of Appeals and they determine not to
review your case, who could you appeal to next?
County Courts
Circuit Courts
District Court of
Appeals
State Supreme Court
Answer: your answer is C
Explanation: i took the quiz on edgen 2021
when driving with The instructor how Many Mistakes can you Miss when you Take behind The wheel
failing varies between licence classes: Class 4: More than 50 points results in failure. Class 5 Basic & Advanced: More than 75 points results in failure. Class 6 Basic & Advanced: 75 points result in failure.
Please answer each question in a paragraph. (a few sentences)
1. This congressional act requires people wanting to purchase a gun from a licensed firearm dealer to go through a background check. (five words)
2. A crime that occurs online, in the virtual community of the internet, as opposed to the physical world. (two words)
3. Probable Cause" as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court requires that a _______ person believes that another person has committed a crime."
1. The congressional act which requires people wanting to purchase a gun from a licensed firearm dealer to go through a background check is called the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This act became law in 1993 and is also known as the Brady Law.
Its main aim is to prevent the sale of guns to individuals who are prohibited from possessing firearms, such as convicted felons, people with domestic violence restraining orders, and people with mental illnesses.
2. The explanation of the crime that occurs online, in the virtual community of the internet, as opposed to the physical world is called Cybercrime. Cybercrime refers to illegal activities carried out through the internet, such as hacking, cyberbullying, identity theft, and online fraud. Due to the rise in the use of technology, cybercrime has become more prevalent in recent years, and it can be challenging to identify and prosecute offenders.
3. The main answer is that a reasonable person believes that another person has committed a crime. Probable cause refers to the legal standard that the police must meet to make an arrest or conduct a search. In the United States, probable cause is defined as a level of suspicion that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed. This standard is set by the U.S. Supreme Court and is an essential component of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Learn more about Cybercrime: https://brainly.com/question/30457725
#SPJ11
georgia vs waller argument
Hi!
In this case, the court decided that the "aims and interests" of open trials are "no less pressing in a hearing to suppress wrongfully seized evidence."
information retrieved from the oral hearing
Hope this helps! :0)
What law prohibits the giving or accepting of payment for referrals of federally funded business?
The law that prohibits the giving or accepting of payment for referrals of federally funded business is the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS).
The AKS is a federal law that makes it a criminal offense to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or receive any remuneration to induce or reward referrals of items or services reimbursable by a federal health care program, such as Medicare or Medicaid.
The purpose of the AKS is to prevent fraud and abuse in federal health care programs by ensuring that referrals are based on the best interests of patients and not on financial incentives. The AKS applies to a wide range of healthcare providers, suppliers, and vendors who do business with the federal government.
To learn more about business here
https://brainly.com/question/24553900
#SPJ4
before being controversially struck down by the supreme court in the citizens united case, the mccain-feingold act:
The McCain-Feingold Act, officially known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), was a campaign finance reform legislation that was controversially struck down by the Supreme Court in the Citizens United case.
The McCain-Feingold Act, enacted in 2002, was a significant campaign finance reform law in the United States. Its main objectives were to restrict the use of soft money (unregulated funds) in federal elections, ban national political party committees from receiving soft money, and regulate issue advocacy advertisements. The act aimed to reduce the influence of corporations and unions in the political process, promoting fair and transparent elections.
However, in 2010, the Supreme Court's ruling in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case struck down key provisions of the act, allowing corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money in support of political candidates. This decision led to a significant shift in campaign finance regulations and has been a subject of ongoing debate and controversy.
To learn more about United States click here, brainly.com/question/1527526
#SPJ11