federal administrative law is a combination of all of the following distinct sources of law that operate in tandem, except

Answer:

jury nullification

Explanation:

looked it up

A defendant is liable for the tort of trespass if, without right, he or she intentionally enters land in possession of another or causes something to do so.

The legal definition of trespass is well known, and it is generally acknowledged that if you enter another person's property without that person's consent or with no other authorization, you are likely to have committed a trespass and are responsible for your actions against the landowner.

The plaintiff must be the one who has "immediate and exclusive" possession of the trespassed property. Possession describes using or having physical control over the land (this may or not be the legal owner of the property – eg. it could be the tenant in commercial property).

To know more about tort of trespass, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/14811201

#SPJ4

Answer:

I beleive it is The Metropolitan Police Act

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is #1 London metropolitan police #2 peelers

Explanation:

Named after the man named Sir Robert Peel, Peelers were the police officers

According to the Constitution, apportionment and redistricting must occur every: ten years.

This process is mandated by Article 1, Section 2 of the United States Constitution and is conducted to ensure fair representation in the House of Representatives.

Apportionment is the process of allocating the 435 seats in the House of Representatives among the 50 states based on population. This occurs after the decennial census, which is conducted every ten years, as required by Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution.

The census provides updated population data, which is used to determine the number of representatives each state will have for the next decade.

Redistricting is the process of redrawing the boundaries of the congressional districts within each state. This is done to accommodate changes in population and to maintain roughly equal representation for all citizens.

Each state legislature is responsible for conducting redistricting in their respective states, following the guidelines set forth by the Constitution and federal law.

In summary, the Constitution mandates that apportionment and redistricting occur every ten years, using the decennial census data to ensure fair and equal representation in the House of Representatives.

To know more about Constitution, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28807839#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Speed = 2.5 miles / hours

Explanation:

Given:

Distance travel = \(1\frac{1}{4}\) miles = 1.25 miles

Time taken = 1/2 hours = 0.5 hours

Find:

Speed

Computation:

Speed = Distance / time

Speed = 1.25 / 0.5

Speed = 2.5 miles / hours

Answer:

False

Explanation:

This is not true of experiential reality. Therefore it is false. Experiential reality is different from what is described in this question. Instead what is described is Agreement reality.

In experiential reality, we have to experience reality or something first before we can establish it as real or true. What we experience could be physical, but through direct experience we are able to know if it is true.

A common constitutional principle used to make a ruling in both McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and Arizona v. United States (2012) is the Supremacy Clause. The Supremacy Clause establishes that federal laws and the Constitution take precedence over state laws when there is a conflict.

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Maryland could not tax the Second Bank of the United States, as doing so would interfere with the federal government's powers granted by the Constitution. This ruling reinforced the Supremacy Clause, demonstrating that state laws cannot undermine federal laws. In Arizona v. United States, the Supreme Court struck down several provisions of an Arizona immigration law, finding that they were preempted by federal law.

This ruling also upheld the Supremacy Clause, emphasizing that states cannot enact laws that conflict with federal laws or interfere with federal authority, especially in the area of immigration. In both cases, the Supreme Court relied on the Supremacy Clause to ensure that federal authority and laws take precedence over state laws, maintaining a balance between state and federal powers.

For more such questions on constitutional principle

https://brainly.com/question/15004627

#SPJ11

Uber's jobs for drivers can be moderately motivating based on the Job Characteristics Model. Factors like skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback contribute to the overall motivation level, although individual experiences may vary.

Overall, Uber's jobs for drivers can provide a moderate level of motivation, with autonomy being a key factor. However, individual drivers' experiences and perceptions may influence the degree of motivation they derive from the job.

For more questions on Job Characteristics Model:

https://brainly.com/question/17228938

#SPJ8

The impact that increasing number of social grants may have on teen mothers is:

This refers to the government cash incentive to take care of a particular social problem.

With this in mind, we can see that because of the increase in social grants, this can have an adverse impact on teenage mothers as they might have an incentive to give birth to more children and depend on the government.

Read more about social grants here:
https://brainly.com/question/4869427

Using the principle applications of the diminishing marginal utility, it can be stated that the marginal utility that Dave has derived from consumption of fourth slice is a lot lesser than the one derived from the consumption of the third slice of the pizza. Therefore, the option C is correct.

As per the diminishing marginal utility law, the additional utility derived by a consumer keeps on diminishing at an increasing rate due to the achievement of a point of satisfaction on the graphical representation of the same.

Learn more about diminishing marginal utility here:

https://brainly.com/question/10511919

#SPJ4

Complete question

Dave bought a pizza, which was divided into five slices. After eating the third slice, he couldn't eat the fourth slice. Applying the law of diminishing marginal utility to this scenario, which of the following statements is true?

a. The marginal utility derived from the fourth slice is more than the marginal utility derived from the third slice.

b. The marginal utility derived from the fourth slice is equal to the marginal utility derived from the third slice.

c. The marginal utility derived from the fourth slice is less than the marginal utility derived from the third slice.

d. The marginal utility derived from the third slice is more than the marginal utility derived from the second slice.

The most likely applicable clause in this case between Zippers, Corp., and the state government is the Contract Clause. Thus, option c is correct.

The Contract Clause is a clause in Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, which forbids states from violating or terminating contracts made by individuals or corporations.

The Contract Clause states that no State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. This clause is aimed at preventing state governments from passing laws that would interfere with private contracts' performance.

The Contract Clause applies to public contracts, such as those signed by state or local governments with private contractors or public-sector workers, as well as private contracts.

This clause states that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. Thus, the option c contract clause best describes the case.

Learn more about Contract Clause here:

brainly.com/question/25697446

#SPJ11

Two fiscal policies that the government can use to improve the economic condition of the country during a recession are:

Expansionary Fiscal Policy: The government can implement expansionary fiscal policy by increasing government spending and/or reducing taxes. Increased government spending stimulates economic activity by creating jobs and boosting demand for goods and services. It can involve investments in infrastructure projects, education, healthcare, or other sectors that can generate employment and stimulate economic growth. Similarly, tax cuts put more money in the hands of individuals and businesses, encouraging increased spending and investment. These measures aim to stimulate aggregate demand, leading to increased economic activity and potentially helping the country emerge from the recession.

Automatic Stabilizers: Automatic stabilizers are built-in features of the fiscal system that help stabilize the economy during economic downturns without requiring specific policy actions. Examples include progressive income taxes and unemployment benefits. Progressive income taxes are designed in a way that higher-income individuals pay a larger share of their income in taxes, which helps redistribute wealth and provide some economic stability. Unemployment benefits provide financial support to individuals who have lost their jobs, helping them meet basic needs and maintain some level of consumption, which can stabilize demand during a recession.

However, it's important to consider potential disadvantages or flaws associated with these fiscal policies. One potential disadvantage of expansionary fiscal policy is the risk of increasing government debt. Increased government spending or tax cuts can lead to budget deficits, requiring the government to borrow money to finance its activities. If not managed properly, this can lead to a growing debt burden, which may have long-term consequences for the economy, such as increased interest payments and potential crowding out of private investment.

Another potential flaw is the timing and effectiveness of fiscal policies. Implementing fiscal policies during a recession requires timely action and accurate targeting. Delays in implementing the policies or misjudgment of the appropriate measures could limit their effectiveness or even exacerbate the economic downturn. It can be challenging to determine the exact magnitude and timing of the fiscal stimulus needed to address the specific circumstances of a recession, and policy mistakes can have unintended consequences.

Overall, while fiscal policies can play a crucial role in improving the economic condition during a recession, careful consideration of their potential disadvantages and flaws is necessary to ensure their effectiveness and long-term sustainability.

To know more about Government visit-

brainly.com/question/31531439

#SPJ11

Examples Of Short-Term Financial Goals are, assess your current money state, establish an emergency fund, put the right insurance in place,

Some Examples of Long term goals are acquire a new job, achieve promotion, develop a career plan.

A financial goal is a scientifically defined economic milestone which you plan to gain or attain. Economic desires contain incomes, saving, making an investment and spending in proportions that match your short-term, medium-term or long-time period plans.

A monetary purpose is a target to purpose for while dealing with your money. It may contain saving, spending, incomes, or even making an investment. creating a list of monetary desires is crucial to creating a finances.

Learn more about financial goals here:- https://brainly.com/question/2801397

#SPJ4

Federalism is a term for a system with two or more governments exercising power over the same people and the same territory.

Federalism is a form of government wherein the two levels of authority share control over the same region. Larger territorial areas are typically governed more broadly by an overarching national government, while local concerns are handled by smaller divisions, states, and cities.

The central government and the local political entities both have the authority to enact laws and enjoy some degree of independence from one another. The Constitution of the United States created a system of "dual sovereignty," whereby the States preserved some sovereignty while ceding many of their authority to the Federal Government. There are some examples of this dual sovereignty listed in the U.S. Constitution.

To know more about Federalism:

brainly.com/question/8305583

#SPJ4

Answer:

Vicarious liability in tort involves holding a particular entity responsible for any wrong doing . The entity may not necessarily be the one who committed it.

The entity bears the consequences and brunt of such tortious actions which may vary from accidents to loss or damage of certain goods and services. The entity is the one who pays the compensations or other forms of reliefs to the victims of the tortious actions.

Answer:

being under pressure could be one

Explanation:

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Miranda applies only to custodial interrogations, which means the police don't have to give Miranda warnings every time they question or talk to someone. Miranda rights come into play when the police arrest or detain someone. Detention here means that the person reasonably believes he or she is not free to leave.

7.1 percent, a new record, represents the percentage of U.S. adults who self-identify as homosexual, gay, bisexual, transgender, or as someone who is not heterosexual. This is double the number from 2011 when Gallup first took this measurement.

The LGBT social movements and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) pride are symbolized by the rainbow flag. The colors, which are sometimes referred to as the gay pride flag or LGBT pride flag, represent the diversity of the LGBT population as well as the range of sexual orientations and gender identities.

The proportion of adults who identify as LGBT has been largely stable among traditionalists, baby boomers, and members of Generation X since Gallup started tracking LGBT identification in 2011. The proportion of millennials has also increased slightly, from 5.8% in 2011 (when some members of the generation had not yet reached the age of 18) to 7.8% in 2017 and 10.5 percent now.

Since 2017, when just the youngest members of Generation Z—those born between 1997 and 1999—had reached adulthood, the percentage of that generation who identify as LGBT has nearly doubled. 10.5 percent of the small portion of the generation who were adults at the time identified as LGBT.

Learn more about the LGBT Rainbow flag here:

https://brainly.com/question/9332926

#SPJ2

Answer:false

Explanation:

Answer:

False would be correct

The punishment that an offender receives is based on the different ethical perspective of the person doing the sentencing.

The ethical view that a judge takes when they are sentencing a person is what ultimately determines the sentence that the offender will get.

For instance, a man runs red lights and has an accident. He doesn't stop because he is trying to get his wife who is in labor to the hospital.

A judge who believes that the ends justifies the means will give that man a lighter sentence because he was just trying to get his wife proper medical care.

Another judge might impose a heavy sentence because the judge wouldn't look at why the man committed the crime, but how it affected other people.

Find out more on ethical perspectives at https://brainly.com/question/8590993.

#SPJ1

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Answer:

Any single hair from anywhere on the human body can be used to identify a person. This conclusion is one of the key findings from a nearly year-long study by a team of researchers from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Forensic Science Center (FSC) and Michigan State University.

Explanation:

human hair. Hair is used as class evidence, and can be used as individual evidence if theres a follicle attached. ... The shaft of a mature human hair does not contain nuclear DNA so that only mitochondrial DNA analysis is possible for such samples.

Answer: Annette should measure the Medulla

Explanation:

The medulla is less than one third on humans and more than one half on animals hence why it would indicate whether it’s human hair or animal hair

Answer:

Explanation:

Conflict Perspective has approach of viewing society as a constantly changing entity, due to competition for scarce resources.

Four key elements are :

Answer:

Private law applies to relationships between individuals in a legal system.e.g. contracts and labor laws.

 Public law applies to the relationship between an individual and the government.

Feel free to ask questions :)

The purchaser should have inspected the house and its various components to identify potential issues that could arise later. It is a case of "buyer beware" in which the purchaser takes the risk while buying the property.

As per the given case, the seller and the purchaser signed a contract for the sale of a 60-year-old house. The contract required a general warranty deed to be given at closing. The contract was silent regarding the condition of the house, and the purchaser did not ask. The purchaser received a general warranty deed with all covenants of title at the closing and promptly recorded the deed. The seller made no disclosures to the purchaser regarding the condition of the property.

Approximately one month after the closing, the furnace in the house stopped working, the basement flooded, and the roof leaked so badly that the second floor could not be occupied. The seller, when told of the house's condition, was genuinely surprised. According to the law, the purchaser cannot hold the seller liable for the defects in the house since the seller gave no disclosures regarding the condition of the house. Also, there are no applicable statutes that require any disclosures. As the seller did not make any disclosures, she cannot be liable for making an affirmative representation.

The purchaser received the general warranty deed at closing, and since there were no additional disclosures made by the seller, the purchaser took the house "as is." Therefore, it is clear that the seller cannot be held liable for the defects in the house since there are no applicable statutes and no disclosures were made by the seller. In this jurisdiction, it is the purchaser's responsibility to conduct a proper inspection of the property before buying it. Thus, the purchaser should have inspected the house and its various components to identify potential issues that could arise later. It is a case of "buyer beware" in which the purchaser takes the risk while buying the property.

For more such question on buyer beware

https://brainly.com/question/30539410

#SPJ11

Sam, as a partner in a limited liability partnership (LLP), may avoid personal liability for C. The malpractice of his partners regarding errors and omissions.

In a limited liability partnership, partners generally have limited personal liability for the actions of other partners in the partnership. This means that each partner is not personally responsible for the wrongful acts or negligence of their partners in the performance of professional services.

However, it's important to note that the extent of personal liability protection may vary based on jurisdiction and specific circumstances. In some cases, partners may still be personally liable for their own wrongful acts or negligence, as well as certain contractual obligations.

Let's address the other options to clarify the scope of personal liability:

A. The wrongful acts of employees acting under his supervision: In an LLP, partners may still have personal liability for their own supervision and control over employees. If a partner is directly involved in the wrongful acts of employees or fails to exercise reasonable supervision, they may be held personally liable for such acts.

B. His own negligent acts: Partners are typically responsible for their own negligent acts, and personal liability may apply if a partner is found to have acted negligently or engaged in misconduct.

D. The negligent actions of his subordinates under his direct control: Partners may be personally liable for the negligent actions of their subordinates if they have direct control and supervision over them. If a partner fails to exercise proper control or allows subordinates to engage in negligent behavior, personal liability may arise.

In summary, while a partner in a limited liability partnership may avoid personal liability for the malpractice of his partners regarding errors and omissions, they may still be personally liable for their own negligent acts, the wrongful acts of employees under their direct supervision, and the negligent actions of subordinates under their control. It's essential for partners to understand the specific laws and regulations in their jurisdiction to determine the extent of their personal liability protection.

Learn more about limited liability partnership here

https://brainly.com/question/27249621

#SPJ11

Answer:

Never give up on the grind