geoff has learned a complaint has been filed against him. what legal rights will help him be prepared and well represented in court?

Answer:

The answer is A just took the quiz

Explanation:

Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government could not enforce laws because There was no national court system.

The Articles of Confederation made the national government quite weak by for instance:

As a result of the federal government being unable to create a national court system, they could not try people who violated laws as only the states could and their laws were not universal.

In conclusion, the federal government could not really enforce laws as it lacked the national court system to prosecute people in.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/16379544.

The Supreme Court ruled that he had been unfairly picked out by the police due to his race.Chinese immigrant Lee Yick conducted a laundry business out of a wooden structure in California.

A legislation that was in effect at the time (the end of the 19th century) stated that this type of business could not be operated in a wooden structure without a specific licence. The majority of the laundry facilities were owned by Chinese immigrants, yet this permit was not obtained for them.The Nationality Acts of 1790 and 1870, which stipulate that in order to qualify for US citizenship, a person must either be “white” or a “native American,” were the legal bases on which the US Supreme Court denied US citizenship to Japanese nationals. According to the law of the soil, every person born within the boundaries or within the territories of the United States is immediately granted citizenship, regardless of their background or family history. The law of the soil also grants children the nationality of the country in which they were born, and this is recognized throughout almost all of the world.

To know more about citizenship visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3588983

#SPJ4

The correct answer to the first question is "All of the above." Each of the examples mentioned (annual car inspections, wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle, and wearing a seat belt while driving a car) represents a third party law.

These laws impose requirements or restrictions on individuals for the purpose of protecting the safety and well-being of others.

Regarding the second statement, the true statement is "Most voters may support the tax the rich strategy because one-half of income earners receive back from the government more than they pay in taxes and/or they do not consider themselves rich." This statement highlights a potential reason why many voters might support taxing the rich. It suggests that some individuals may not perceive themselves as being affected by higher taxes on top income earners and may benefit from government programs that are funded through such taxation.

It's important to note that the other statements provided in the question represent different economic perspectives and opinions, rather than universally accepted truths. Austrian economists and Keynesian economists have different views on tax policies and economic strategies. The statement about the bottom half of taxpayers paying more than 60% of federal taxes in a recent year may be a factual claim, but without specific data or context, it is challenging to determine its accuracy.

To know more about third party law

https://brainly.com/question/9996328

#SPJ11

In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees

All of these are ways to express a legal description EXCEPT benchmarks. Option B

A benchmark is a point of reference for surveying or mapping, often a physical mark on a permanent object such as a building or monument.

The method of expressing a legal description that is NOT one of the ways is "benchmarks."

While benchmarks may be used in the process of creating a legal description, they are not typically considered a method of expressing the description itself.

The other three methods listed are ways to express a legal description:

a. Rectangular survey: A rectangular survey is a system of surveying land in a grid pattern, with each parcel of land described by its location in the grid.

b. Lot and block: A lot and block system is a method of describing a parcel of land by its location within a subdivision or plat, often using a map or plan of the subdivision.

c. Metes and bounds: The metes and bounds system is a method of describing a parcel of land by its boundaries and physical landmarks, often using measurements and angles to define the boundaries.

Hence, the correct answer is benchmarks.

Learn more about legal description at:https://brainly.com/question/24257457

#SPJ1

Answer:

Monetary policy is the process by which the monetary authority of a country, generally the central bank, controls the supply of money in the economy by its control over interest rates in order to maintain price stability and achieve high economic growth.

Explanation:

The law of insider trading has been called everything from a "theoretical mess" to "astonishingly dysfunctional," with calls for change from Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission to clarify the scope of the prohibition. But is the law really so bad? The elements are now well established, despite gray areas around the edges like other white collar crimes. Congress and the general public have embraced insider trading as something clearly wrongful. If the law needs to be changed, the most likely push would be to expand it by adopting the possession theory of liability used in Rule 14e-3 for tender offers and the European Union that makes trading on almost any confidential information subject to prosecution.

Answer:

C.

The school diverted funds to prepare students for good jobs.

Explanation:

i did the quiz and looked it up and i saw this had not been answered so i guessed and got it right. Can i get brainliest

Answer:correct

Explanation:

The term that is defined as chemicals that are close relatives of controlled substances but not themselves listed on one of the controlled substance schedules is "analogues" or "analog drugs." Analog drugs are substances that have a similar chemical structure or pharmacological effect to controlled substances but are not specifically listed as controlled substances.

These substances may be designed to mimic the effects of controlled substances or to evade legal regulations by exploiting loopholes in the law. Analog drugs can still have similar psychoactive or physiological effects as controlled substances and may pose similar risks to public health and safety.

To learn more about analog drugs refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/14691130

#SPJ11

Answer:

Article One of the United States Constitution.

Explanation:

In the United States constitution is marks the Legislative branch of the Government which consist a bicameral branch of the Government, the Upper level the Senate, and the Lower Level the House of Representatives, it also establishes the speaker role, who heads the senate, and the qualifications of someone to take a particular legislative office.

Answer:

Yes, the forensic pathologist's opinions and the autopsy results are vital components of any medicolegal death investigation, they perform autopsies to determine what caused a person's death.

Explanation:

False. The syllabus clearly states that class rules may be modified or amended from time to time as deemed appropriate by the instructor.

The instructor reserves the right to make changes to the syllabus and class rules whenever deemed necessary. This may be done in order to keep up with changes in the subject matter, or in the case of a disruptive student, the instructor may decide to modify the class rules to ensure that all students have a safe learning environment.

Furthermore, the instructor may change class rules in response to feedback from students. It is important to remember that the instructor is the final authority on all decisions regarding the syllabus and class rules. Therefore, while the syllabus may initially state that the class rules are not subject to change, this is not a guarantee that they will never be changed.

Know more about instructor here

https://brainly.com/question/14450776#

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Union organizing, labor contract negotiations, and agreement administration make up the three stages of the labor relations process that results in a union-management partnership.

The pluralistic perspective contends that there are other sources of power at play in the interaction between employees and corporate executives. Under a pluralistic approach, where power is sought to be balanced between management and workers, unions are frequently a key element.

When we talk about labor relations, we mean the interactions between employers and workers. They are impacted by a variety of things, including as labor unions, collective bargaining, the job market, government policy, the makeup of the economy, labor law, and technological advancement.

​

​To know more about labour relations visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28214843

#SPJ1

When something has already occurred, you can use it as a legal standard to start matching if you favor the decision made in the case; this is referred to be precedent.

Controlling precedents are referred to as "binding authority" in a jurisdiction. Any legal authority that a court must abide with while making a decision is known as a binding authority. Persuasive authority: Courts frequently use persuasive authorities (case law from other jurisdictions) while making decisions in first-impression matters. Occasionally, a court will veer from the rule of precedent if it determines that it should no longer be obeyed. This is known as a departure from first impression. A court may make a decision that differs from a precedent if it determines that the precedent is simply inaccurate or if social or technological advancements have rendered it irrelevant.

To learn more about precedent please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14816803

#SPJ4

The kind of speech in the photograph might be restricted if it takes place at a certain location, time, or in a particular way, according to past Supreme Court decisions.

The Supreme Court of the United States is the top court in the land and the only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution directly calls for. The number of Supreme Court justices is not clearly forth in the Constitution; rather, Congress determines the number. Along with the Chief Justice, the President of India has appointed 30 more judges to the Supreme Court of India. Judges of the Supreme Court begin their retirement at age 65. The supreme court is the highest court in the majority of legal systems. The terms "court of last resort," "apex court," and "high (or ultimate) court of appeal" are also used to refer to these courts.

Learn more about Supreme Court here

brainly.com/question/28046758

#SPJ4

Explanation:  

The question is telling you to "describe the Gongalez family's situation", so I'm pretty sure they your teacher was talking about it or gave you a quick summery (Which is basically what your going to do). Go through it and pick out facts that stood out to you that are very important in this case. After you have done that in YOUR own words, make it sound professional and first-class. You got this, try your best and I hope I described the question very well.

Answer:

Concept on clashes with consideration to values  is described below in details.

Explanation:

A conflict originating from the interplay of people with diverse cultural values. There are two types of conflict in history: Internal conflict is within the character's psyche. Internal conflict can be characterized as a conflict between resisting forces of passion or sentiments within a person. External is a struggle between a persona and an external force.

Answer:

true beacuse there always part of the mainstream

Answer:

c

Explanation:

This is an incident of non-violation. The fourth amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, but in Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), the Supreme Court ruled that drug tests for all students participating in extracurricular activities are a reasonable way to prevent and deter drug use.

The Bill of Rights includes the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. It forbids arbitrary searches and seizures.

Fourth Amendment case law addresses three major issues: what constitutes "searches" and "seizures" by the government, what constitutes probable cause to conduct searches and seizures, and how to address violations of Fourth Amendment rights.

Therefore the incident is not violating any amendment.

To learn more about the fourth amendment, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28246295

#SPJ1

Answer:

In a judicial sale, a junior lien holder is not extinguished by foreclosure of the property or asset.

Explanation:

Judicial Sale: When a court forces, authorizes or requires the sale of a property or assets in order to satisfy the debt for which it was pledged as collateral, a Judicial sale is said to have occurred.

Foreclosure: Many times, this is said to be the result of a judicial sale. When a judicial sale occurs it is mostly done to recover unpaid debts. When this happens in real estate, it is called foreclosure. Especially when the property was mortgaged and the mortgagee has stopped making payments.

Lien: In the above scenario, assuming a family or a person takes up a mortgage for a house, the legal document retails the original owners and probably the bank or the government (depending on who the realtor is) as part-owners until the debt is fully paid. When the loan is fully paid, then total rights are transferred to the mortgagee. In the above case, the bank and original owners of the property are considered Liens.

Junior lien: This is a statutory position that is created when a mortgagee uses the mortgaged property to secure another loan whilst the first loan is still in existence.

Under such a scenario, the person who secures the other loan is called a Junior lien holder.

Cheers

Hello. You forgot and put the graph to which this question refers. The chart is attached below:

Answer:

42.354%

Explanation:

To answer this question it is necessary to make a very simple calculation that relates the total number of judgments by jury to the number of civil cases judged by juris. In this case, you must analyze the last line of the graph and use the following values in the calculation.

5082 ---- 100%

2154 ----- x

x = (2154 * 100) / 5082

x = 42.354%

When courts are faced with interpreting a contract to determine the meaning and legal effect of the terms used by the parties, the court will first attempt to determine the parties' intent.

The court will look to the language of the contract and will consider the circumstances under which the contract was formed, such as the negotiation process between the parties, any prior agreements between them, and the surrounding circumstances. If the parties have clear, unambiguous language expressing their intentions, the court will give effect to the language used.

If, however, the language of the contract is open to multiple interpretations, the court will consider extrinsic evidence, such as past performance, prohibited use of the contract for something other than its stated purpose, or any other details that might shed light on what the parties intended. Ultimately, the court will endeavor to interpret the language in a manner that carries out the intentions of the parties.

To know more about court , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ4

Answer: A. Medicare

Example - the anwser is A my human friend

Yes, the Law of Large Numbers can be applied to accidents involving airplanes.

The Law of Large Numbers is a statistical principle that states that as the sample size increases, the average of the sample will tend to approach the expected value of the underlying population. In the context of airplane accidents, this means that as the number of flights increases, the observed accident rate will converge to the true accident rate.

Airplane accidents are rare events, but they can still be analyzed statistically. A large number of flights take place daily, providing ample data for analysis. As more flights are conducted, the overall trend of accident rates becomes clearer, allowing researchers and safety experts to identify patterns and implement preventive measures.

The Law of Large Numbers can be helpful in understanding the safety of air travel. It allows aviation experts to assess the effectiveness of safety protocols and make informed decisions about necessary improvements. As the number of flights continues to grow, the law ensures that the observed accident rates will provide an accurate representation of the true risks associated with air travel. This information is crucial for maintaining and enhancing safety standards in the aviation industry.

In conclusion, the Law of Large Numbers does apply to airplane accidents, as it helps analyze the safety of air travel and contributes to the development of effective safety measures. With an increasing number of flights, the statistical analysis of accident rates becomes more reliable, allowing for a better understanding of risks and the implementation of necessary safety improvements.

Know more about statistical principle here:

https://brainly.com/question/30592795

#SPJ11

Answer:

The supreme law of the United States of America is the Constitution of America. The 1st and the 2nd amendment to the Constitution provided right to freedom and equality to all. It provided liberty to the people.

Explanation:

1. The application and the interpretation of the 1st amendment and the free exercise clauses to reflect an ongoing majoritarian practice of religion and the free exercise. This was during the case of Wisconsin v. Yoder

2. Efforts to balance the social order as well as the freedom of the individual are reflected by the interpretation of the 1st amendment which limits speech and includes place, manner regulation, time, defamatory, offensive statement, etc.

3. U.S. Supreme Court has held symbolic speech o be protected by the 1st amendment.

4. According to the 2nd amendment, the decision of the Supreme court rests upon the constitutional interpretation of the individual liberty.

Answer:

Well, A bill is born and being proposed the bill is referred to the committee, Which at this point the bill is examined carefully by the committee. Then, The bill is being marked up by the subcommittee

Committee action to report

the bill

Voting

And, If the bill passed the voting, it's referred to other chamber

Conference committee action, After the house and senate approve the bill, It can be brought up to the president. Hope That Helps!!~