Answers
Answer:
This ability to mobilize forces stems from gerrymandering, the long-standing tactic of redrawing voting districts for political advantage, in the fight of politics. Politicians may sway the outcome in their favor and win the war before it ever starts by figuring out who will vote where.
Explanation:
Brainliest pls
Related Questions
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answers
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
A change in or addition to the constitution is called a
Answers
Answer:
amendment
Explanation:
Answer:
Amendment
Explanation:
Which is the main idea in the Ninth Amendment quizlet?
Answers
Answer:
The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution (Amendment IX) is part of the United States Bill of Rights, and protects rights that are not expressly enumerated in the Constitution.
The Ninth Amendment explicitly excludes the denial of rights not enumerated if the denial is based on the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution, but this amendment does not explicitly exclude the denial of rights not enumerated if the denial is based on the enumeration of certain powers in the Constitution. the Constitution. It is to that enumeration of powers that the courts have indicated, in order to determine the degree of the rights not enumerated mentioned in the Ninth Amendment.
During a peaceful protest, an individual encourages others to perform acts of vandalism. The individual is arrested by state police and taken into custody. In the trial that follows, the individual's lawyer claims that the First Amendment rights of the accused are extended to the state and local levels through which of the following?
Answers
The Court administered in Schenck v. US (1919) that discourse making an "irrefutable risk" isn't safeguarded under the Principal Correction.
No State will make or implement any regulation which will abbreviate the honors or susceptibilities of residents of the US; nor will any State deny any individual of life, freedom, or property, without fair treatment of regulation; nor deny to any individual inside its purview the equivalent assurance of the regulations.
Fair treatment under the Fourteenth Amendment can be separated into two classifications: procedural fair treatment and considerable fair treatment.
A leading group of Instruction of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) The Equivalent Assurance Condition of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution restricts states from isolating government-funded school understudies based on race.
To learn more about Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/8244125
#SPJ4
what would be a negative effect economic effect of a government’s decision to build a new highway?
Answers
Answer:
the transport of goods. because it was a new highway people was on there and the goods that they were transferring would be delayed on both trading sides
Any driver under 21 who is found to have a BAL of .05 or higher willA. be required to attend a substance abuse courseB. automatically have their license suspended for one yearC. be imprisoned for up to one yearD. not be allowed to drink alcohol until they are 25
Answers
Any driver under 21 who is found to have a BAL of .05 or higher will be required to attend a substance abuse course. The right answer is a.
Any driver under 21 who is pulled over by law enforcement and also has a.02 or greater blood alcohol content will certainly have their licence suspended for six months.
Every driver under 21 who has a.05 or higher breath alcohol concentration or blood alcohol concentration is compelled to take a substance abuse course. For any and all drivers under the age of 19, a test will be finished, and the results will be communicated to parents or legal guardians.
The correct answer is option a.
Know more about substance abuse course here
https://brainly.com/question/14311822
#SPJ4
Designating a different set of specific powers to both the house and the senate best illustrates which principle of government? responses.
Answers
The clearest example is when certain authorities are granted to the house and senate separately. The concept of government is shown by popular sovereignty.
What three sorts of sovereignty are there?The federal govt, state governments, and tribal governments are the three different forms of sovereign states in the US. The people—the individuals with the right to vote—are the source of a federal government's sovereign power. The federal government is the source of a state's sovereign authority.
What makes sovereignty so crucial?The manner in which freedom, equality, and justice are created and upheld in society depends on the precise definition of establishing national sovereignty. Therefore, the foundation of liberty, equality, and justice is national sovereignty. There are no constraints on freedom in our nation or culture.
To know more about sovereignty visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7793449
#SPJ4
A growing number of law enforcement dispatchers and officers on the street believe that the 10-code system has outlived its usefulness. Compose a convincing argument that either supports this contention and offers an alternative form of communication shorthand that appropriately addresses contemporary calls for law enforcement response, or argue that the 10-code remains viable and useful in police communication but would benefit from some modernization; also provide examples of how you would modernize the code. You should answer this question using a minimum of 300 words.
Answers
Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code
Explanation:
I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad answer lol
Greg Deveroux just turned eighteen years old, and on a dare from friends he foolishly entered the arcade on the city’s boardwalk after it had closed for the evening. He has never been in trouble with the police before and did not steal anything in the arcade, although he did trip over some boxes in the storeroom. The noise alerted the night watchman, who subsequently turned Greg over to police, and he was arrested for breaking and entering. Today he stands before the judge at his arraignment to determine if he will be released from jail until his trial begins in three months. What is the most likely outcome of Greg’s request to be released from jail? Responses
Answers
Greg won't need to post bail or hand over any property deeds to ensure his attendance; he will be freed on his own recognizance.
What does Gentle Is the Night mean?"Soft or delicate in texture or consistence; yielding easily to force or pressure; fragile; easily broken, divided, compressed, or wounded," according to the dictionary, describes what tender means. Keats and Fitzgerald appear to be telling us that the night is particularly vulnerable in this way.
Is Tender Is the Night a book you should read?This book is a masterpiece from beginning to end, and I've read it numerous times, getting something new out of each reading. It is a tragedy, a romance, and a wellspring of rich, poetic prose.
To know more about bail visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30054626
#SPJ1
Assignment 3.7. Wills trusts, and estate administration
Natalie Robinson dies without a will. The tollowing relatives survive her: a husband. Len: an adopted daughter. Lana: a toster son. I homas: two sisters. Faith and Nadine: a brother. I hor: her
mother, Simone; her father, Ernie; her mother-in-law, Isla; Len's sister, Cynthia; an aunt, Rose; an uncle, Oscar; two nephews, Donnie and Kevin, sons of her deceased brother, William; a
niece, Diane, daughter of her deceased sister, Sharon; a grandson, David, son of her deceased daughter, Denise; a granddaughter, Luella, daughter of her deceased daughter, Nancy; and
Manny, a husband by a prior marriage whom she divorced.
Who is the intestate:
Who is the administrator or administratriX
3. Name the laws that govern the passage of the decedent's estate
4. Hind and cite the state statute that would determine the nassage of Natalie's estate in vour state
Name the decedent S lineal relatives who are ascendants and descendants
b. Name the colateras related to the decedent
TaList al the potential successors (heirs )of the decedent
8. Name the relationship that entitles the persons in Ouestion 7 to possibly share in the decedent's estate
Answers
The answer response are given below:
The intestate refers to a person who dies without a will.The administrator or administratrix refers to the person appointed by the court to manage and distribute the estate of a person who dies without a will.The laws that govern the passage of the decedent's estate are referred to as intestate succession laws. These laws determine who will inherit the property of a person who dies without a will.The state statute that would determine the passage of Natalie's estate would vary based on the state in which she resided at the time of her death. In most states, the state's probate code governs the distribution of an intestate estate.Natalie's lineal relatives who are ascendants include her mother, Simone; her father, Ernie; and her mother-in-law, Isla. Her lineal relatives who are descendants include her adopted daughter, Lana; her foster son, Thomas; her grandson, David; and her granddaughter, Luella.The collateral relatives related to the decedent include her two sisters, Faith and Nadine; her brother, Ihor; Len's sister, Cynthia; her aunt, Rose; her uncle, Oscar; two nephews, Donnie and Kevin; a niece, Diane; and a husband by a prior marriage, Manny.The potential successors (heirs) of the decedent would typically include her surviving spouse, Len, and her children, Lana, Thomas, David, and Luella. In some states, Natalie's siblings and parents may also be considered as potential heirs.The relationship that entitles the persons in question 7 to possibly share in the decedent's estate is that of legal heirs under the state's intestate succession laws.What is the intestate about?Intestate: A person who dies without a valid will is said to have died intestate. In this case, their assets will be distributed according to state law, rather than the individual's wishes.
Therefore, Administrator or Administratrix: An administrator or administratrix is the person appointed by the court to manage the estate of an intestate decedent. The administrator is responsible for collecting and distributing the assets of the estate to the rightful heirs.
Learn more about intestate at:
https://brainly.com/question/1140802
#SPJ1
if you are convicted of dui for the _______ time, the court will require you to install an ignition interlock device (iid) on every motor vehicle you operate for up to ten years.
Answers
If you are convicted of DUI for the third time, the court will require you to install an Ignition Interlock Device (IID) on every motor vehicle you operate for up to ten years.
A conviction for driving under the influence (DUI) can have severe consequences, especially for repeat offenders. In many jurisdictions, the penalties escalate with each subsequent DUI conviction. For example, if someone is convicted of DUI for the third time, they may be required by the court to install an Ignition Interlock Device (IID) on all the motor vehicles they operate for a period of up to ten years.
An IID is a breathalyzer device that is connected to a vehicle's ignition system. Before starting the vehicle, the driver must blow into the device to measure their blood alcohol concentration (BAC). If the BAC exceeds the predetermined limit set by the court, the vehicle will not start. The purpose of an IID is to prevent individuals from driving while under the influence of alcohol.
Requiring repeat DUI offenders to install an IID serves multiple purposes. Firstly, it acts as a deterrent, making it more difficult for individuals with a history of DUI to operate a vehicle while intoxicated. Secondly, it provides a monitoring mechanism to ensure compliance with the court's orders and enhances public safety. By forcing individuals to undergo a breath test each time they start their vehicle, IIDs help prevent potential accidents caused by impaired driving.
The duration of IID installation can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the number of prior DUI convictions. While some states impose a mandatory installation period of several years, others may have a shorter duration. It's important to note that the cost of installing and maintaining an IID typically falls on the convicted individual.
Learn more about Ignition Interlock Device here
https://brainly.com/question/30229370
#SPJ11
a board that is elected in a classified system is known as a
Answers
A board that is elected in a classified system is known as a "classified board." In this structure, the board members are divided into separate classes, with each class serving staggered terms. This ensures continuity in the board's leadership and decision-making processes while allowing for democratic representation through regular elections.
A board that is elected in a classified system is known as a governing board. These boards typically consist of individuals who are elected by the community or appointed by the government to oversee the operations of a particular organization or institution. The board members are responsible for setting policies, making strategic decisions, and ensuring that the organization is operating effectively. In a classified system, the board may also be responsible for managing classified information or confidential matters. A governing board typically consists of a set number of members, and decisions are made through a voting process.
To know more about classified board visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23013010
#SPJ11
By age 2, children __________. Select one: a. take turns in face-to-face interaction b. can infer a speaker's indirectly expressed intention c. adjust their speech to fit the age of their listeners d. adjust their speech to fit the social status of their listeners
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Because you cant expect a baby to talk to you face-to-face, and they won't do c or d either.
TRUE / FALSE. The united states federal government formally recognizes the work that project managers do and their contributions to the economy
Answers
TRUE. The United States federal government formally recognizes the work that project managers do and their contributions to the economy. Project managers are responsible for the successful completion of a project.
They are responsible for overseeing everything from planning, organizing, and managing resources to deliver a project on time and within budget.Project managers are responsible for coordinating all aspects of the project, including setting project goals, identifying stakeholders, and developing a plan to achieve those goals.
They must also manage the project team, ensuring that everyone is working together to achieve the project's objectives.Project management has become an essential part of many organizations. The United States federal government recognizes the importance of project managers and their contributions to the economy.
To know more about organizationsvisit:
https://brainly.com/question/17164427
#SPJ11
The legally defined area over which an agency has control is known as which of
the following?
Answers
Answer:
The Law agency
Explanation:
The law of agency is an area of commercial law dealing with a set of contractual, quasi-contractual and non-contractual fiduciary relationships that involve a person, called the agent, that is authorized to act on behalf of another (called the principal) to create legal relations with a third party.
Under Miranda vs. Arizona, police must advise suspects of all but which of the following rights:
a) the suspect's absolute right to have a free attorney (regardless of wealth) as long as suspect wants one.
b) the suspect's right to have an attorney present while being questioned.
c) the suspect's right to remain silent.
d) the suspect's right to be advised that anything they say could be used against them in court.
Answers
Answer:
B. The Suspect's right to have an attorney Present while questioned.
Explanation:
What is required to become a reserve police officer with most police departments? The candidate must have served in the military. The candidate must have served as a police officer for at least ten years before applying. The candidate must be personally recommended for the position by the police chief and a member of the mayor’s staff. The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer.
Answers
Answer:
The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer.
Explanation:
In Indiana, reserve officers are required to complete 40 hours of basic training, as well as 24 hours of continuing in-service training each year
how can the principle of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims
Answers
Answer:
The officials should research the crime area and they should also get the statements from the person who killed. Until all the investigation is completed, they should treat the person as neither criminal nor victim. ... In principles of Ubuntu, a victim should be treated with broad humanity and ethics
Explanation:
Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial. They say it is a question of competence. What does this most likely mean?
A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
B. The evidence in Kendall’s case is inconclusive and doesn’t prove anything.
C. Kendall is an expert witness who has testified many times before.
D. The police think it will hurt their case if Kendall chooses to testify.
Answers
In a case whereby Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial and say it is a question of competence means that A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
What is a trial ?A trial can be described a the formal examination of evidence which is been done in the court by the judge that is in charge and this been performed when the jury is available so that the guilt in a case of criminal can be known.
It should be note that in the case above the question came out to know how fit is Kendall might be .
Therefore, option A is correct.
Read more about Detectives at:
https://brainly.com/question/26059088
#SPJ1
In a 1973 book, historian Arthur Schlesinger analyzed whether the president of the United States has become overly powerful and was no longer subject to constitutional checks and balances. Schlesinger made his argument following the Watergate scandal stating, “The expansion and abuse of presidential power constitute the underlying issue, the issue that Watergate has raised to the surface, dramatized, and made politically accessible.” Take a position on whether or not Schlesinger’s argument that the presidency has become too powerful is true today. In your essay,
Articulate a claim or thesis that addresses the issue raised by Schlesinger, and use a line of reasoning to defend it.
Use at least TWO pieces of relevant and accurate evidence to support your claim or thesis.
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the foundational documents listed below:
Constitution of the United States
Federalist No. 51
Federalist No. 70
Brutus No. 1
Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document listed above or from your study of the American presidency.
Use reasoning to explain why the evidence you provided supports your claim or thesis.
Use refutation, concession, or rebuttal to respond to an opposing or alternative perspective.
Answers
Answer:
“. . . We have come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall Heir.”
-Martin Luther King, Jr., “I Have a Dream” Speech, August 1963, March on Washington
Should the American Independence movement be interpreted as a promise that the government will protect the natural rights of all of its citizens?
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning to defend it.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information:
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
The above question seeks to assess your argumentation capacity and your interpretation of the national policy. For that reason, I can't write the argument for you, but I'll show you how to write one.
First, you must analyze how the role of the President of the Republic has changed over the years and how these changes have modified the power the President has in the country.
During this research, you must decide if, in your opinion, the president has very strong powers that are dangerous to society.
You should do this based on the documents indicated in the question and based on articles dealing with this subject.
Based on that, you can write your argument as follows:
Enter the subject you want to present.Show your argument, that is, your opinion on this subject.Present evidence, taken from the documents and articles you have read, that proves that your argument is correct and true.Show an argument contrary to yours.Present evidence, which proves that this argument is incorrect.Finish the text by reinforcing your argument.More information:
https://brainly.com/question/18468191?referrer=searchResults
There are two options for question 4, choose one question to answer.
What is Sociology?
What is Social structure?
What is the difference between the Gallup Poll and their survey on crime and the Justice Department survey on crime?
Create a diagram/matrix labeling both horizontal and and vertical structures and your place within it. (2 points) OR
Sociologist C. Wright Mills emphasized that social structure lies at the root of private troubles, and that what people may define as private troubles may be more accurately described as public issues, if these problems affect large number. What personal troubles have you encountered that may also be public issues? (2 points)
Helppp pleaseeee
Answers
Answer:
1. Sociology is the scientific study of society, including patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and culture. It focuses on the social, cultural, and political factors that shape and influence human behavior and societies.
2. Social structure refers to the organized patterns of relationships within a society. It includes the social institutions, norms, and values that shape and influence the behavior of individuals and groups within society.
3. The Gallup Poll is a public opinion polling organization that conducts surveys on a wide range of topics, including crime. The Justice Department survey on crime is a statistical survey conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice that collects data on crime and criminal justice in the United States. One key difference between the two surveys is that the Gallup Poll is a private organization, while the Justice Department survey is conducted by a government agency. Additionally, the Gallup Poll may use different methods and sample sizes than the Justice Department survey, which could result in different findings and conclusions.
I can't do the diagram for you.
Personal troubles that I have encountered that may also be public issues:
Lack of access to affordable healthcare: I have struggled to afford healthcare for myself and my family, and I know that this is a problem faced by many people in my community and beyond. This is a public issue because it affects a large number of people and has implications for public health and the overall well-being of our society.
Housing insecurity: I have struggled to afford stable and secure housing at times in my life, and I know that this is a problem faced by many people in my community. Housing insecurity is a public issue because it affects a large number of people and has implications for economic stability, social mobility, and overall well-being.
If OC expert is requiring pre-payment of depo fee, DFC prepays and then sends us the invoice, correct?
Answers
Answer:
calculate it by self and know
Answer: There are certain situations where a deposit is required from either buyer or seller. In such cases, you may issue a prepayment invoice, sometimes called a prepaid invoice.
A prepayment invoice is a document used to record advance payments from suppliers or clients. It contains the amount to be prepaid on a sales order and enables you to invoice deposits required from clients or sellers.
Prepayments can be calculated based either on the percentage of the total order or have a fixed amount.
Explanation:
If an amount is shown in box 7 of form 1099-C this always means?
Answers
Answer: Fair market value of
Explanation: Box 7: Fair market value of property. If a foreclosure or abandonment of property occurred during the same year—and in connection with the canceled debt—box 7 shows the fair market value, or you will receive a separate 1099-A form.
According to your text, one problem with restitution is that most offenders:
A) consider restitution to be inflammatory and refuse to participate in providing it
B) provide restitution, but usually the wrong kind
C) arrange for others to assume the burdens of restitution for them
D) have neither the financial means nor the abilities to provide adequate restitution
Answers
According to your writing, one issue with restitution is that most offenders lack the financial resources and ability to make meaningful recompense. Here option D is the correct answer.
Restitution is a form of punishment that requires an offender to compensate their victim for the harm they caused. While it can be an effective means of repairing harm, it can also pose challenges when it comes to implementation. One of the major challenges is that many offenders lack the financial means to provide adequate restitution.
For example, if an offender caused property damage that costs thousands of dollars to repair, they may not have the financial resources to fully compensate the victim. Another challenge is that some offenders may lack the skills or abilities to provide the type of restitution that is most appropriate.
For instance, an offender who caused physical harm may not have the medical knowledge or skills needed to provide adequate medical treatment to the victim. In some cases, offenders may also lack the motivation to provide restitution or may try to avoid it by arranging for others to assume the burdens of restitution for them.
To learn more about restitution
https://brainly.com/question/15869415
#SPJ4
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answers
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
Three different way of cultural learning
Answers
Cultural learning may be accomplished in three ways:
Imitative learningInstructed learningCollaborative learningWhat is Cultural learning?Cultural learning is the process through which a group of people or animals within a civilization or culture learn and transmit knowledge. Learning styles are heavily impacted by how society interacts with its children and youth. In the last fifty years, a cross-cultural study has mostly concentrated on contrasts between Eastern and Western civilizations. Individuals can gain talents that they would not be able to master on their own during the course of their lives through cultural learning. Cultural learning is thought to be especially essential for humans. When compared to the appearance of adult teeth, humans are weaned at a young age.
To learn more about Cultural learning, click
https://brainly.com/question/29024017
#SPJ1
which of the following would properly be raised under the first amendment establishment clause? building a chapel on a military base. conducting buddhist services in a prison. distributing religious material at a shopping mall. prohibiting polygamy.
Answers
The following would properly be raised under the First Amendment Establishment Clause: prohibiting polygamy.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution contains two clauses that pertain to religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. These clauses together prohibit the government from establishing religion and protecting citizens' rights to practice religion.
Furthermore, the Establishment Clause forbids the government from interfering in religion in any way, including endorsing or promoting one religion over others.The Establishment Clause is the provision of the First Amendment that prohibits the government from enacting legislation to promote or inhibit the free exercise of religion.
Hence prohibiting polygamy is the correct option that would properly be raised under the first amendment establishment clause.
To know more about prohibiting polygamy refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/9440338
#SPJ11
4. You are about to enter the scene of a double homicide to begin your investigation and collect evidence. Please list the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) you would want to wear while working in the scene and why
Answers
Disposable gloves: Wearing gloves, preferably nitrile or latex, will protect your hands from blood, bodily fluids, and other potentially infectious materials. Gloves also prevent the transfer of your fingerprints and DNA to the crime scene, which could contaminate evidence.
Protective clothing: A disposable coverall or jumpsuit should be worn to protect your clothing from blood, bodily fluids, and other contaminants. This also minimizes the risk of transferring fibers, hair, or other trace evidence from your clothes to the crime scene.
Shoe covers: Disposable shoe covers or booties should be worn over your shoes to prevent tracking blood or other contaminants from the scene, as well as to protect your shoes from potential hazards.
Face mask: A face mask, such as a surgical mask or N95 respirator, should be worn to protect you from inhaling airborne particles, blood spatter, or other potentially infectious materials.
Protective eyewear: Safety goggles or glasses should be worn to shield your eyes from blood spatter, debris, and other potential hazards.
Hairnet or cap: A disposable hairnet or cap should be worn to prevent your hair from contaminating the crime scene or falling into the evidence.
Optional PPE: Depending on the specific conditions of the crime scene, you may also need additional protective gear, such as a full-face shield, apron, or disposable sleeves.
Wearing appropriate PPE is crucial for ensuring your safety, maintaining the integrity of the crime scene, and preventing the contamination of evidence. It also helps to preserve the chain of custody and increases the admissibility of evidence in court.
Hamedah fled from an abusive relationship to her cousin's home at age 21 and says she regrets her decision to run errands for her cousin related to crack cocaine. Which goal of punishment presumes that citizens will choose not to commit a crime because they have observed the punishments that criminals have received, and they will conclude that the costs of crime
Answers
Answer: a. General deterrence
Explanation:
The General deterrence goal of punishment stems from the belief that if a person sees another person punished for doing something, they will not do that same thing in order to avoid punishment.
For instance, if a person sells crack cocaine and are caught by the police, they will be taken to a court of law and if found guilty, sentenced to a prison term. The general deterrence goal behind that is that when people like Hamedah see people who sell crack cocaine going to jail, they will avoid selling crack cocaine in order to avoid going to jail as well.
most individuals do not show evidence of reflective judgment until their ________, if at all.
Answers
Most individuals do not show evidence of reflective judgment until their early adulthood, if at all. Reflective judgment refers to the ability to evaluate and make decisions based on complex information and evidence.
This cognitive ability develops gradually over time and is influenced by various factors, such as education, life experiences, and culture. However, some individuals may never reach a stage of reflective judgment due to a variety of reasons, such as cognitive disabilities, limited education or exposure to diverse perspectives.
It is important to note that reflective judgment is not a one-size-fits-all concept and individuals may demonstrate varying degrees of this ability depending on the context and the nature of the decision they are making. Therefore, it is crucial to consider individual differences and contextual factors when evaluating reflective judgment.
Most individuals do not show evidence of reflective judgment until their late adolescence or early adulthood, if at all. This developmental milestone is often reached as employees gain more experience, education, and exposure to diverse perspectives.
It's important to note that not everyone develops this skill to the same extent, and some may never fully exhibit reflective judgment. Supporting the growth of reflective judgment in individuals can lead to better decision-making, problem-solving, and overall critical thinking abilities.
To know more about employees click here
brainly.com/question/31166948
#SPJ11