How do politicians use public opinion polls ?

Answer:

I would say False

Explanation:

Anything that is between a doctor and patient is confidential, even their personal notes because it has to do with the patient.  

A surveying method is the best data collection method to use when doing research on body-worn cameras on police use of force.

This involves a technique that allows to gather information in research by asking questions to a predefined group of people.

Hence, the surveying method is the best data collection method because the information about body-worn cameras on police use of force will be collected directly from the respondents.

Read more about survey method

brainly.com/question/14610641

#SPJ1

In general there are six peremptory challenges that are available to attorneys in noncapital cases when choosing a jury.

Thus the answer is six.

Refer here to learn more about peremptory challenges: https://brainly.com/question/1858186

#SPJ4

Answer: Senators are appointed by the governor of the state.

Explanation: I think the answer is correct.

Hope that Helps!

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

National Government is just the government of a single country

Answer:

federal government is the answer

Law is different from a norm because The law is a structured, written standard that protects an individual's capacity and strictly requires that it be upheld.While the norm is the broad rule that governs society before the laws of morality and the law are in place.

Difference between law and norm?

To know more about law and norm visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8224362

#SPJ9

Answer:D

Explanation:

Restitution (compensating victims) for damages and losses is punishment's goal.

The idea of wrongdoers compensating victims for their damages and losses refers to the goal of restitution or compensation. Restitution aims to restore or make amends for the harm caused by the wrongdoer by requiring them to provide compensation to the victim.

It is a form of punishment that focuses on repairing the harm rather than solely punishing the offender.

The goal that refers to wrongdoers compensating victims for their damages and losses is restitution. Restitution seeks to restore the victim by requiring the wrongdoer to pay them monetary compensation. It aims to address the harm caused and provide some form of reparation for the losses suffered by the victim.

By imposing this requirement, the justice system acknowledges the need for the offender to take responsibility for their actions and make amends to the victim. Restitution serves as a form of punishment that focuses on repairing the damage caused and assisting the victim in recovering their losses, rather than solely punishing the wrongdoer.

Learn more about Restitution

brainly.com/question/31027325

#SPJ11

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is C. making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects

Explanation:

Trust me

Answer:

Honesty – tell the truth.

Integrity – be morally upright.

Responsibility – be accountable for yourself and your actions.

Respectfulness – treat others how you want to be treated.

Compassion – show fellowship with your compatriots who are down on their luck by volunteering and/or making donations to charities.

Kindness – be friendly.

Tolerance – be tolerant of other races and religions.

Courtesy – be considerate of others.

Self-Discipline – have self-control and cultivate the ability to follow through on what you say you’re going to do.

Moral Courage – stand up for what you consider to be wrong and defend those who cannot defend themselves.

Love of Justice – be fair and ask that others be so as well.

Explanation:

HAVE AN AWESOME DAY.

The total costs would be:1500+3000+6000+15000+30000= $55 500 now it depends on how much the insurance is. There is no average settlement on the above case.

Insurance is a means of protection from financial loss in which, in exchange for a fee, a party agrees to compensate another party in the event of a certain loss, damage, or injury. It is a form of risk management, primarily used to hedge against the risk of a contingent or uncertain loss.

An entity which provides insurance is known as an insurer, insurance company, insurance carrier, or underwriter. A person or entity who buys insurance is known as a policyholder, while a person or entity covered under the policy is called an insured.

The insurance transaction involves the policyholder assuming a guaranteed, known, and relatively small loss in the form of a payment to the insurer in exchange for the insurer's promise to compensate the insured in the event of a covered loss.

Learn more about insurance, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27822778

#SPJ2

The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

The Symbolic restitution usually involves some form of B) Apology. In many cases, additional forms of restitution, such as monetary compensation.

Symbolic restitution is a concept in which an individual or entity offers a symbolic gesture to make amends for a wrongdoing or harm caused to another party. This type of restitution does not involve direct material compensation or punishment, such as monetary payment, community service, or imprisonment. Instead, it focuses on acknowledging the harm done and expressing remorse in a meaningful way.
Apologies play a significant role in symbolic restitution as they provide the opportunity for the wrongdoer to express regret and demonstrate their understanding of the impact of their actions. An apology can also help the affected party to process their feelings, find closure, and potentially begin the process of forgiveness.
It is important to note that symbolic restitution, while valuable, may not always be sufficient to address the consequences of a wrongful act. In many cases, additional forms of restitution, such as monetary compensation or community service, may be necessary to fully make amends and repair any damage caused.
In summary, symbolic restitution is centered around the idea of expressing remorse and acknowledging the harm caused through means such as apologies, as opposed to more tangible forms of compensation or punishment.

Learn more about apology :

https://brainly.com/question/31108667

#SPJ11

Yes, it can be appropriate for the civil court to award damages, such as nominal damages, in cases of trespass even if no actual loss has been suffered by the person suing.

In tort law, the primary objective is to provide compensation for injury or damages suffered by an individual due to the wrongful conduct of another party. Generally, it is necessary for the person suing to demonstrate that they have suffered some form of loss or harm as a result of the defendant's actions. However, there are instances where the civil court may award damages even if no direct loss has been suffered.

In the case of trespass, for example, where an individual unlawfully enters another person's property without permission, the court may award nominal damages even if no actual harm or financial loss has occurred. This is because the law recognizes that trespassing violates a person's right to exclusive possession of their property, and such a violation alone is considered a legal wrong deserving of compensation.

The purpose of awarding nominal damages is to vindicate the person's rights and deter future trespasses, even if no quantifiable loss has been incurred. While some argue that awarding damages without actual loss may be seen as unfair or frivolous, it serves the broader purpose of upholding the principles of property rights and deterring wrongful conduct.

Additionally, nominal damages are typically symbolic in nature, representing a minimal amount rather than substantial compensation. Overall, the appropriateness of awarding damages without direct loss depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of tort law in promoting justice and deterring unlawful behavior.

Know more about tort law here:

https://brainly.com/question/32273454

#SPJ8

Answer: B

Explanation: Active analysis is more effective than passive monitoring because it is proactive and allows you to identify problems before they occur. Passive monitoring is reactive and requires time to detect issues.

Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:

Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/14620330

#SPJ1

    Politics and power have long been studied, but political science as a field is relatively young. Political scientists conduct their research objectively, logically, and methodically, just like other social scientists do. This is known as a "scientific" approach.

A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is considered illegal and void. This means that the contract is not legally binding and cannot be enforced by either party.

It is important to note that the illegality of the contract must be related to the purpose of the contract, rather than incidental or minor violations of the law. For example, a contract to sell illegal drugs would be illegal and void, but a contract to sell a car where one party happened to be driving without a license would likely still be enforceable. It is not possible for the contract to be enforceable as a quasi-contract, as quasi-contracts arise when there is no actual contract in place but one party has received unjust enrichment at the expense of the other. In the case of an illegal contract, there is no valid contract, to begin with.

The contract is also not simply voidable, which would mean that one party has the option to void or cancel the contract at their discretion. Instead, the contract is considered illegal and void, meaning that it is null and void from the outset and cannot be ratified or enforced.

Finally, the contract is not dischargeable, as discharge typically refers to the release of a party from their obligations under a contract. In the case of an illegal contract, there are no valid obligations, to begin with, so discharge is not applicable.

In summary, a contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void, which means it is not enforceable and has no legal effect. This is a detailed answer to your question that provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal implications of an illegal contract.

Learn more about quasi-contract

https://brainly.com/question/29651556

#SPJ11

A contract that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void. Such a contract opposes public policy and societal interests. Additionally, if any contract limits competition and encourages illegal activities, it also falls under such a category.

A contract for a purpose that causes the parties to violate a law is illegal and void. Such a contract is not enforceable, as it opposes public policy and societal interests. Generally, a legal system must enforce contracts to ensure economic transactions and growth. However, if a contract encourages illegal activities, this opposes the purpose of law and justice, therefore, it falls into the category of an unlawful contract.

Consider this example for a clearer understanding: If a large retailer obtained the exclusive rights to be the only distributor of televisions, computers, and audio equipment made by various companies, then, this exclusive contract despite potentially being legal, may limit competition and hence, it would have an anticompetitive effect and could be ruled as unlawful.

https://brainly.com/question/33763152

#SPJ6

Answer:

D

Explanation:

society sucks

An worker is taken into consideration terminated at the belief of this kind of settlement, judicial decisions a new agreement is obtainable or the clauses in the preliminary contract are amended.

As in most countries, employees in India who are terminated by employers are regularly given one month be aware or price of one month of wages in lieu thereof.

The worker can ship a legal word to the agency in case of such unjust termination. The worker can eventually move the labor court docket, in case no alleviation is supplied from the business enterprise. once the Codes are powerful, it'll be the industrial Tribunal, as opposed to Labour Courts.

An employee can handiest be terminated with out notice or salary in lieu of note in cases of misconduct. To terminate employment for misconduct it's miles critical to establish the misconduct via a disciplinary enquiry this is held for such cause according with the concepts of natural justice.

Learn more about judicial decisions here

https://brainly.com/question/29610097

#SPJ4

Answer:

It provides public goods and supplies

Explanation:

Governments can create subsidies, taxing the public and giving the money to an industry, or tariffs, adding taxes to foreign products to lift prices and make domestic products more appealing. Higher taxes, fees, and greater regulations can stymie businesses or entire industries.

The concept of community crime careers look at the number of career offenders living in each concentric zone of the city is a perspective of community criminology.

What is Community Criminology? Community criminology is a branch of criminology that looks at the social context of crime, especially in communities. Community criminology examines how the social structure of an area, such as poverty or the concentration of liquor stores, affects crime in the region.

Community crime careers are the paths that individuals follow as they become and persist as criminals within a community. This can be divided into several stages, each of which corresponds to a different type of criminal activity.

According to the theory, the goal of criminal activity is to become successful enough to progress to the next stage of the career and achieve status among one's peers. As a result, the crime becomes self-perpetuating, with more and more people joining in as they perceive the opportunity for advancement.

In conclusion, the concept of community crime careers examines how people's criminal activity careers develop over time in a certain area of the city. This study focuses on how the social structure of the location, such as the presence of crime opportunities, affects crime in the area.

Learn more about community crime careers at https://brainly.in/question/54987805

#SPJ11

It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.

As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.

These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.

Missing options True/False

Read more about attacks

brainly.com/question/28866933

#SPJ1

Answer:

Here is the short story:

The blood spilled on the floor and led to the greasy and spilled oil can on the other side of the garage. Mr. Link was just murdered, the knife was gone, however. I questioned 3 suspects. Mark said he was making some noodles for lunch, and didn't hear anything over the loud music. Scarlett said she was listening to stray kid's new hit, "oddinary". Melanie said she was playing with Mr. Link's son, Randy, and she heard a scream. She thought it might be Scarlett's music. "What were you doing," Mark asked. "I was at work and came out to find this. I looked at Mark. "Show me the kitchen." The kitchen was clean, and the noodles were ready and hot. "When were you making this?" I asked. "Oh, around 11:00." I looked at the time. It was 2:00. I dialed 911. "Say hi to jail," I said.

Explanation:

The evidence was the time. It was 11:00 when he made it, and 2:00 when he was done, and his noodles were still hot, which means that he must've lied about the time in order to trip him off.  The scream was Mr. Link, and the music drained it all out for Scarlett.

Answer: While both parties were of sound mind and came to the agreement as equals -- and it is considered legally binding in most cases -- written contracts are always more defensible.

Answer:

I don't know I think that they sometimes just hurt people because they are doing their job but I honestly don't know.

Explanation: