How do you identify ethos pathos and logos?

Answer: The question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and contested issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While it is true that humans are the only species that are legally accountable for their actions, the reasons for this are not necessarily clear-cut, and raise important ethical and philosophical questions.

One argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans possess a unique capacity for moral reasoning and decision-making that other animals lack. This capacity allows humans to understand the consequences of their actions and make choices based on ethical principles, which is a key factor in determining legal accountability. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which non-human animals are capable of moral reasoning, and whether their actions should be judged by the same standards as human actions.

Another argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans have created complex legal systems that are designed to regulate and enforce social norms. These legal systems are based on the principle of individual responsibility, which holds that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and the consequences that result. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which legal systems are designed to reflect universal ethical principles, and whether they are biased in favor of human interests.

Ultimately, the question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While there are certainly arguments in favor of human exceptionalism, there are also important ethical and philosophical questions that need to be considered. It is important to engage in a rigorous and thoughtful analysis of these issues in order to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.

Plea bargains is widely practiced for practical reasons. Defendants can avoid the time and expense of defending themselves in court, the risk of harsher penalties, and the publicity that a trial can bring.

Criminal justice is about giving justice to those accused of committing crimes. The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and agencies. Goals include rehabilitation of offenders, prevention of other crimes, and providing emotional support to victims.

To best serve people, criminal justice professionals must demonstrate integrity, dedication, and a resource fulness that builds trust. Police officers and judges must act according to the laws of their country, not based on their personal feelings about a person's situation.

Learn more about Criminal justice  https://brainly.com/question/7207817

#SPJ1

Answer:

A promotion party is a time to celebrate the huge accomplishment in a coworker, boss, friend or other acquaintance.

Explanation:

The trial stage of the juvenile court process involves the presentation of evidence, examination of witnesses, and a determination of the juvenile's guilt or innocence.

During the trial stage, the prosecution and defense present their respective cases in front of a judge or sometimes a jury. Evidence is presented, witnesses are questioned, and legal arguments are made to establish whether the juvenile is responsible for the alleged offense. The judge or jury then evaluates the evidence and makes a decision regarding guilt or innocence. If found guilty, the court proceeds to the disposition stage, where appropriate consequences or interventions are determined for the juvenile.

The trial stage in the juvenile court process serves as a pivotal moment where the evidence is examined, and a decision is made regarding the juvenile's culpability. It is an essential step in the legal process to ensure fairness and justice for juveniles involved in criminal cases.

To know more about juvenile court click here:

https://brainly.com/question/7579071

#SPJ11

Answer:

a. the senate

Explanation:

the senate approves the governors appointment of judges

Answer:

c the voters

Explanation:

The proof is probably going to be conceded because it is sensible to accept the vehicle contained proof of the capture.

As indicated by Award choice, Police could make an immediate capture if the suspect has a proceeding with danger to their security presented by anew arrest.

Whenever police answer a solicitation to go into the crime location, the division would furnish them with an overall portrayal of the circumstance, (for example, the depiction of potential culprits or how hazardous the circumstance is)

The handgun moved by the looters in this present circumstance is considered as something that has a proceeding with danger to their security. Accordingly, the actual proof recuperated would doubtlessly be conceded.

Learn more about patrol:

https://brainly.com/question/29636822

#SPJ4

Answer:

The prosecution's responsibility relative to the corpus delicti in obtaining a conviction for any crime is to provide sufficient evidence that a crime was committed.

According to the EVIDENCE § 640 (11th ed. 1935), corpus delicti cannot be proven by a defendant's confession or admission.  It remains the responsibility of the prosecution to provide enough evidence for the commission of a crime.  It is only a defendant's voluntary confession that can be admitted as evidence.  However, each judge is expected to weigh the confessional evidence.

Explanation:

Corpus delicti refers to a criminal justice principle that requires sufficient facts to be gathered as evidence to prove that a crime had been committed.  This implies that corpus delicti is the body of evidence or facts and not a dead body as wrongfully construed sometimes.

Answer:

What?

Explanation:

You didn't explain your question at all please just tell me what is going on and I can see if I can help you.

Before the 14th amendment, the federal government did not have explicit powers to safeguard the rights of the people against state governments. The United States Constitution defined a federal government with limited powers and reserved most of the authority to the states.

In the early stages of the United States, state governments could regulate the rights of their citizens according to their wills. This brought about a situation where some citizens were treated unfairly by their state governments.The Supreme Court handed down several decisions that showed that the Constitution was not written with the intention of granting the federal government power to protect people against state government violations. The Court noted that the Bill of Rights was only intended to protect people from the federal government's abuses, not the state government. However, the federal government had been proactive in defending the rights of the people to a certain extent.

President George Washington's administration played a critical role in implementing the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution that were added in 1791 to protect people's liberties. The federal government's ability to safeguard civil rights expanded during the Civil War (1861-1865). President Abraham Lincoln exercised presidential powers and authority under the Constitution, including executive orders and military tribunals, to prevent Southern states from engaging in slavery and secession.

To know more about  14th amendment visit-

brainly.com/question/30555056

#SPJ11

Answer:

Retreatism refers to rejection of both the goals and the means, and rebellion occurs when individuals reject both and then create new goals and means to pursue. According to Merton's theory, ritualism occurs when a person rejects the normative goals of their society but nonetheless continues to participate in the means of attaining them.

The power of judicial review  is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.

Constitutionality is defined as the state of being in line with the laws or provisions of the applicable constitution;[1] it is also the status of a legislation, a procedure, or an act being in conformity with those laws or provisions. They are unconstitutional when policies, practices, or actions directly contravene the constitution. Unless a government has a system in place for declaring legislation unlawful, all other laws are regarded as constitutional.

A measure passed as law by the national legislature or a lower-level legislature, like the legislature of a state or province, may be ruled to be unconstitutional. The constitution, which is the document that defines the government, also contains laws that must be upheld by governments.

Learn more about judicial branch here

https://brainly.com/question/9696040

#SPJ4

Answer:

Yes!

Explanation:

You can sue anybody for anything as long as the judge accepts it.

Answer:

Poverty does not directly cause crime; instead, it is a factor in the cause but, independently, it is not the root source (Barr 5). During the Great Depression, poverty levels were much higher than they are today, but crime actually declined

27

Explanation:

in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa

The areas of stress that may have to affect the work of policemen would be:

This is the term that is used to refer to the emotional feeling that is caused by the tension that a person would feel. The stress that they feel would make them to react in ways that may show their displeasure and frustration at given events.

The ways that the stress that the police officers feel can be reduced is when they are let to have fewer hours of work on the field. We know that the work that they do is stressful enough.

When they are adequately compensated and let to have vacation and off days. This would help them to regain their strength.

Also giving them the ability to have enough medical attention that they need is also a way to help the police officers.

Read more on stress here: https://brainly.com/question/11819849

#SPJ1

In this case, Digong's contention is not entirely correct. He committed the crime of attempted theft.

The crime committed by Digong in this case is known as attempted theft  and not frustrated theft because an attempted theft occurs when the offender commences the execution of the crime by overt acts but fails to complete it by reason of some cause or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance.

In this case, he took cartons of sardines can goods from the supermarket which is an overt act of theft but was immediately apprehended by the security guard which prevented him from completing the crime. This makes his offense an attempted theft as he had the intent to steal but was not able to complete the crime.

Read more about sales contract

brainly.com/question/28326714

#SPJ1

The false statement among the limitations, prohibitions, and challenges listed is: "Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government."

In reality, one of the primary reasons for classifying information is to protect national security, not to prevent embarrassment to the government. The classification system is designed to safeguard sensitive information that, if disclosed, could potentially harm the country's interests, compromise intelligence sources, or endanger individuals. Classifying information is governed by specific criteria and guidelines that prioritize national security concerns over potential embarrassment. The U.S. government has established clear procedures and standards for determining what information should be classified and the level of classification required.

In summary, the false statement is that "Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government." Classification of information primarily aims to protect national security rather than prevent government embarrassment.

To know more about national security, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2639721

#SPJ11

Answer:

A human right explanation is the act in which people's basic rights are infringed.

Explanation:

Such as:

Answer:

The concept of therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that the court should be evaluated not just for its potential effect on recidivism, but for its impact on the well-being of all those who participate in it, and IPV scholars suggest that empowerment is a key component of any therapeutic intervention for victims

Explanation:

Considering the recent concern of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and violations against women, there are huge ramifications for the police, the courts, and correctional administrations.

The police should focus on preparing and responsiveness towards casualties, guaranteeing appropriate treatment of cases and offering help. The courts will confront expanded caseloads, requesting productive and fair settlement, as well as the requirement for defensive measures. Restorative administrations should address the recovery and wellbeing of culprits while safeguarding casualties' freedoms.

Cooperative endeavors and changes around there are critical to battle IPV actually and guarantee equity, assurance, and backing for ladies impacted by these wrongdoings.

Learn more about police, from:

brainly.com/question/2166731

#SPJ7

Answer: Your welcome!

Explanation:

The statement is likely referring to the containment policy of the United States during the Cold War, which sought to 'contain' the spread of communism and the Soviet Union's influence. The government policy of the United States at the time was to actively counter communist expansion both regionally and internationally. This policy involved providing military and economic aid to countries threatened by communism, as well as seeking to shape international policy through the United Nations and other organizations. In contrast to containment, the statement is likely referring to a policy of 'rollback' in which the United States actively sought to rollback the Soviet Union's influence and actively pursue the removal of communist governments.

The statement regarding international communism in 1960 differs from the government policy because the statement is a declaration or a position on a specific issue, while the government policy is a set of guidelines or rules that dictate how the government will handle or approach a specific issue.

For example, the statement may be that the government does not support the spread of international communism and believes it to be a threat to national security.

However, the government policy may outline specific steps or actions that the government will take to prevent the spread of international communism, such as implementing economic sanctions or providing support to anti-communist groups.

In short, the statement is a general declaration of the government's position, while the government policy is a detailed plan of action to address the issue.

For more similar questions on communism:

brainly.com/question/8177547

#SPJ11

Ensuring that overtime pay rates are calculated correctly is a major challenge associated with the implementation of the Fair Labor Standards Act for workers employed on a flexible basis. The correct answer to the given question is; D)

Learn more about Fair Labor Standards Act: https://brainly.com/question/16858218

#SPJ11

U.S. courts often place the burden of tort law upon a business defendant despite a general predisposition to favor business activity.

While U.S. courts may generally have a tendency to favor business activity, they often place the burden of tort law on business defendants for several reasons. Firstly, businesses are typically in a better position to prevent and manage risks compared to individuals. They have the resources, expertise, and capacity to implement safety measures and mitigate potential harm. Holding businesses accountable for their actions or negligence promotes a culture of responsible behavior, encouraging them to prioritize safety and take necessary precautions.

Secondly, businesses generally have more resources and financial capacity to compensate injured parties. Placing the burden of tort law on a business defendant ensures that the victim receives fair compensation for their damages and losses. It helps to restore the harmed party and deter future negligence or wrongdoing.

Moreover, businesses, particularly large corporations, often have a higher level of responsibility due to their economic power and societal impact. They may be involved in activities that have widespread implications, affecting the environment, public health, or consumer safety. Courts recognize the need to hold such powerful entities accountable to maintain a fair and just society.

learn more about courts here; brainly.com/question/29865285

#SPJ11

It should be: Command of the Armed Forces is the right answer

Egypt was a country  which removed foreign rule in 1952 following a revolt against the british.

Option B is correct.

The overthrow of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak was demanded by millions of protesters from a variety of socioeconomic and religious backgrounds. At least 846 people were killed and over 6,000 were injured in violent clashes between security forces and protesters.

During the Cold War, the Revolution contributed to the escalation of decolonization and the growth of Third World solidarity. It also ushered in a new era of revolutionary politics in the Arab world.

Question incomplete:

Which country removed foreign rule in 1952 following a revolt against the British?

A. Tunisia

B. Egypt

C. Libya

D. Morocco

Learn more about Egypt revolt of 1952:

brainly.com/question/759441

#SPJ4

Answer:

A court holds members of an LLC personally liable for the debts of the organization. Court may pierce an LLC's veil if members: ... Fail to observe formalities- Members must treat the LLC like a separate organization.

plz give brainlist

hope this helped

The Allotment Act intended to impose upon the Native Americans the European concept of private property.

What is the Allotment Act?

The Allotment Act was passed by the United States Congress in 1887. This law was also known as the Dawes Act, named after Senator Henry L. Dawes of Massachusetts, who created the bill. The act aimed to dissolve the communal landholding system of Native American tribes and to allot individual Native Americans a plot of land for farming, a practice known as the allotment.

The Allotment Act aimed to make Native Americans more like European Americans. The European concept of private property was imposed upon the Native Americans through the Allotment Act. It was thought that, by doing so, the Native Americans would be more willing to adopt the habits of farming and ranching that had made European Americans so successful.

The law was disastrous for many Native American tribes. Instead of receiving the benefits they were promised, many Native Americans were left without a source of income. Their land was too small to farm, and it was often of poor quality.

However, many Native Americans were forced to sell their land for less than it was worth, and some were left homeless.

Hence, the Allotment Act intended to impose upon the Native Americans the European concept of private property.

Read more about Allotment Act at https://brainly.com/question/32327605

#SPJ11