How does Plessy v Ferguson show judicial restraint?

(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.

(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices for the rest of 2022 would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement would be classified as price fixing, which is an anticompetitive practice. Price fixing involves competitors colluding to set prices at a certain level, eliminating competition and harming consumers. Such agreements are typically prohibited under US antitrust laws, including the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. Price fixing reduces consumer choice, suppresses competition, and can result in higher prices for consumers.

(b) Ford, GM, and Stellantis having electric vehicle factories in different US states but selling their vehicles in every US state would generally be legal under US antitrust law. This situation does not involve any explicit anticompetitive practices such as price fixing or market allocation. As long as each company competes independently in the marketplace and does not engage in collusion or other forms of anticompetitive behavior, their ability to sell vehicles across state lines is generally permissible.

(c) Ford, GM, and Stellantis increasing the price of new electric vehicles due to higher input prices, such as labor costs and computer chips, would likely be legal under US antitrust law. Pricing decisions based on legitimate factors such as increased production costs are generally within the purview of individual companies. As long as these companies do not coordinate their pricing decisions through collusion or anticompetitive agreements, they have the discretion to set prices according to their own cost structures and market conditions.

(d) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing to isolate dealerships into separate geographic regions of the US, with each company taking control of a specific region, would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement is known as market allocation, where competitors divide markets among themselves, eliminating competition in certain areas. Market allocation agreements are generally considered anticompetitive and are prohibited under US antitrust laws. These agreements harm competition, restrict consumer choice, and can lead to higher prices. In the given scenario, if Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree to isolate dealerships into specific regions, it would restrict competition and violate antitrust laws.

In summary, (a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.

Learn more about  illegal

https://brainly.com/question/27375182

#SPJ11

All of the above options refers to a  "firm" for California purposes.

What is a Firm?

A firm is a business organization, such as a corporation, partnership, or sole proprietorship, that is engaged in commercial, industrial, or professional activities. The term can also refer to the owners of a business organization, who are usually referred to as the firm's owners or principals.

What is California purposes?

California purposes is a phrase used to refer to laws and regulations that apply specifically to California. This includes legislation, regulations, and court decisions that are specific to California, as opposed to federal laws and regulations applicable to the entire United States.

To know more about a firm,

https://brainly.com/question/28457190

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

A STEADY GREEN LIGHT means you may drive through the intersection if the road is clear. You may also turn right or left unless a sign tells you not to; however, when turning, you must yield to other vehicles and pedestrians within the intersection.

After federal taxes are accepted they are approved within 21 days. The IRS issues most refunds within this time frame, but there may be some delays due to various factors such as errors on the tax return, incomplete information, or suspected identity theft or fraud.

Taxpayers can check the status of their refund on the IRS website or by calling the IRS hotline. The status updates may take up to 24 hours to appear after e-filing of federal taxes, and up to four weeks after filing by mail.

It's important to note that the 21-day timeframe is only an estimate, and some tax refunds may take longer to process. In cases where additional information is needed or there are other issues with the tax return, the refund may be delayed.

To know more about IRS go to

https://brainly.com/question/29392341

#SPJ4

Answer:

D. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code

The U.S. Bankruptcy Code is best example of statutory law.

Statutory instruments that have been authorized by a legislator, either a state or federal government, are known as statutory laws.

Regulations may mandate particular acts, ban them, serve as statements of purpose, or specify how the government will behave in specific situations.

So, Option "D" is the correct answer to the following question.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/19769037?referrer=searchResults

the Pleading document is filed with the court to state the position of the plaintiff or the defendant in a lawsuit and ask for relief from the court.

Pleadings are the formal legal paperwork that parties must file with the court to begin a case. Typical pleadings include a statement of claim and defense. These types of documents detail your unique claim or defense as well as the facts that support it. In the pleadings, the court and the other parties should be informed of the case's key issues that need to be resolved. This article explains the function of pleadings and the information they include. In the pleadings, all relevant factual assertions that the parties will need to substantiate at trial are made. It's important to remember that a party must include in its pleadings any fact or detail that can surprise the other party or undermine the other party's position.

To know more about the pleading document visit:- brainly.com/question/20814132

#SPJ4

The "reasonable person standard" is a legal term widely used in sexual harassment claims. Simply said, it refers to someone who is meant to be reasonable and who would perceive and react to a scenario of sexual harassment in a reasonable way.

Any organization that wants to effectively handle the issue at hand must closely adhere to the "reasonable person test" in sexual harassment proceedings. If employers don't apply this standard to any sexual harassment accusation, they run the risk of allowing their own personal preferences to potentially bring a lawsuit into court. As a result, the victim can be required to pay out incredible quantities of money in compensation in addition to having to pay hefty legal fees and risking unfavorable publicity in the age of social media.

Know more about sexual harassment here

https://brainly.com/question/13182824#

#SPJ4

Answer:

A, neglect

Explanation:

All the other ones were talking about giving up something(abandonment),being responsible( good Samaritan), Having an approval to do something specific(Consent) But, from all of those Neglect was the one not being responsible in fear and being an able to take actions.

Answer:

D: Installation of security cameras

Explanation:

The given statement "Every state has a governor and attorney general in the executive branch." is false as while every state has a governor, not all states have an attorney general in their executive branch.

All states have governors, but not all of them have an attorney general as part of their executive branch. In some states the attorney general is chosen independently of the governor while in other states the governor or other elected officials appoint the attorney general.

In addition, some states have different executive branch structures such as councils of elected officials rather than governors, which may or may not have an attorney general. In the United States, the governor is the head of state government and is elected by the people of each state.

The governor appoints officials to various state agencies, oversees the state budget and is in charge of putting state laws into effect and enforcing them.

Learn more about governor at:

brainly.com/question/28010042

#SPJ1

Answer:

Gubernatorial appointment.

Explanation:

With the method of gubernatorial appointment, a state governor will appoint a judge to a particular court, and confirmation by either an executive counsel or state legislation will follow.

Answer: Answer is below <3

Explanation: There are eight different kinds of fingerprint patterns, such as radiatal loop, ulnar loop, double loop, central pocket loop, plain arch, tented arch, plain whorl and accidental.

please give brainliest if I’m correct! Tyty <33

Controlled substances are drugs and other substances that are regulated by the government due to their potential for abuse and dependence, as well as their medical benefits. There are five categories, or schedules, of controlled substances in the United States, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act:

Schedule I: This category includes drugs that have no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Examples include heroin, LSD, and marijuana.

Schedule II: This category includes drugs that have a high potential for abuse and dependence, but also have some accepted medical uses. Examples include oxycodone, fentanyl, and Adderall.

Schedule III: This category includes drugs that have a moderate to low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include codeine and anabolic steroids.

Schedule IV: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include Xanax and Ambien.

Schedule V: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include cough medicines that contain codeine.

The categories are differentiated based on the substance's medical uses, potential for abuse, and likelihood of causing dependence. The stricter regulations on Schedule I substances reflect the fact that they are considered to have a higher potential for harm and abuse, while Schedule V substances are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse and dependence. The schedules are used to guide the regulation of these substances, including their manufacture, distribution, and prescription.

Answer:

Shoulder belt

Explanation:

The given amendment is the 20th amendment of the US Constitution. It is paraphrased in complete sentences as given below.

The Twentieth Amendment is the amendment which sets the dates for the President, Vice President and members of Congress (Senators and Representatives). It sets the dates for when all these important personalities would take office.

The President and the Vice President shall start their jobs on 20th January. The members of Congress (Senators and Representatives) shall start their jobs on 3rd January.

Before this amendment, all of them started their jobs on 4th March. President Franklin Roosevelt was the first president who started his term in January.

To know more about 20th amendment here

https://brainly.com/question/13846279

#SPJ1

Answer:

What this amendment means is that all the terms that they have made have not been approved by, those that date then they will be ended, but if they have been, then the terms will arise.

Explanation:

What this assignment is asking is to paraphrase this amendment and a paraphrase is express the meaning of the writer or speaker or something written or spoken using different words, especially to achieve greater clarity. Which means for this assignment all you had to do is to put what you got out of the amendment.

Answer:

To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish ...is needed

Explanation:

if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest

Typically, the most important elections on a state's political calendar are the gubernatorial elections, state legislative elections, and midterm elections.

Gubernatorial elections allow voters to choose the chief executive of their state, who wields considerable power and influence over a range of issues, including education, healthcare, economy, and public safety. These elections often attract significant attention, media coverage, and campaign spending, as they shape the political landscape and can have long-lasting impacts on the state's trajectory.

The outcomes of gubernatorial elections can also have broader implications for national politics, as state governors play a crucial role in shaping policy debates and party dynamics at the federal level.

Learn more about elections: https://brainly.com/question/29628143

#SPJ11

The benefits of collective bargaining agreements include better wages, improved benefits, job security, improved working conditions and a voice in the workplace.

Collective bargaining agreements are contracts between an employer and a union that outline the terms and conditions of employment for workers represented by the union. The benefits are explained as follows:

1. Better wages: Through collective bargaining agreements, workers are able to negotiate for higher wages, ensuring that they are fairly compensated for their work.

2. Improved benefits: Collective bargaining agreements often include provisions for health insurance, retirement plans, and other benefits, which can be more generous than those offered to non-union workers.

3. Job security: Collective bargaining agreements typically include provisions that protect workers from layoffs or unfair dismissal, providing greater job security.

4. Improved working conditions: Collective bargaining agreements can include provisions for safe and healthy working conditions, ensuring that workers are not exposed to unnecessary risks on the job.

5. A voice in the workplace: Through collective bargaining agreements, workers have a voice in decisions that affect their jobs and their working conditions, giving them greater control over their work environment.

Overall, collective bargaining agreements provide a range of benefits for workers, including better wages, improved benefits, greater job security, and a voice in the workplace.

To know more about collective bargaining agreements, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/27032996#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Financial literacy as essential equipment to secure hacking and theft practices

Explanation:

Some of the measures to be taken are there should be the introduction of the use of ATM cards and allied stuffs in connection to financial matters for every individual

Answer:

fancy

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

To ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Where as the Maritime Administration is the agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation dealing with waterborne transportation. Its programs promote the use of waterborne transportation and its seamless integration with other segments of the transportation system, and the viability of the U.S. merchant marine. At times these both agencies work along with U.S. Customs towards crime prevention from the routes the are entrusted with. These agencies hold joint exercises and searches along with U.S. Customs to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports

To know more about Crime Prevention:

brainly.com/question/14495855

#SPJ1

Answer:  The correct answer is to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports

Explanation:  This answer has been confirmed correct.

The  law that has made ethics training even more important is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Federal legislation known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed stringent financial and auditing standards for publicly traded firms. To assist shield shareholders, employees, and the general public from accounting mistakes and dishonest financial activities, legislators enacted the legislation.

The U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30 of that year in an effort to safeguard investors against misleading financial reporting by businesses. 1 Also referred to as the SOX Act of 2002, it required stringent updates to current securities laws and placed severe new penalties on offenders.

Therefore, option C is correct.

Learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act at:

https://brainly.com/question/5481344

#SPJ1

Answer:

Government

Explanation:

Democracies have something called the "consent of the governed" where the people trust the Government (institution) to create and enforce public policies as approved by the people.

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

Government

Explanation:

Did the quiz (k12) and got it right. It'd be awesome if you'd mark this as the brainliest answer :)

Answer:

1. Katarungang Pambarangay is an innovation of the Philippine justice system. It provides for resolution of disputes at the barangay level in order to achieve peace and harmony within the community and to provide an accessible and effective form of justice for community members.

2.Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice administered at the barangay level for the purpose of amicable settling disputes through mediation, conciliation or abitration among the family or barangay without resorting to the courts.

In this case, the issue revolves around whether Mr. Bond can be sued by Mrs. Anderson for breaching the contract. To determine the answer, we need to analyze the concept of contractual performance and breach.

In general, a breach of contract occurs when one party fails to fulfill their obligations as stated in the agreement. However, there are certain circumstances where a party may be excused from performing their contractual duties. One such circumstance is when the performance becomes impracticable or impossible due to unforeseen events or circumstances beyond the control of the party.

In this situation, an unexpected storm caused massive flooding, resulting in Mrs. Anderson's yard being covered in debris and mud. As a landscaping contractor, Mr. Bond would need to clean up the debris and dig through the additional mud before installing the sprinkler system and landscaping. This would require significant extra time, equipment, and manpower.

Given the unforeseen and extreme circumstances caused by the storm, it can be argued that performance of the contract became impracticable for Mr. Bond. The additional work required to clean up the yard and dig through the mud was not anticipated at the time of entering into the contract. It would impose a significant burden on Mr. Bond, making it unreasonable to expect him to perform the contract as originally agreed upon.

Under the legal doctrine of impossibility or impracticability, a party may be excused from their contractual obligations if the performance becomes commercially impracticable due to unforeseen events. In this case, the storm and resulting flooding created such an unforeseen event that rendered performance impracticable for Mr. Bond.

Therefore, in my opinion, Mr. Bond cannot be sued by Mrs. Anderson for breaching the contract. The unforeseen and extreme circumstances made performance impracticable, relieving Mr. Bond of his contractual obligations. However, it is important to note that the specific laws and legal principles governing contracts may vary depending on the jurisdiction, and it is advisable for Mr. Bond to consult with an attorney familiar with the local laws to assess his specific situation.

To know more about contractual performance and breach, visit : brainly.com/question/31359788

#SPJ11