How does this passage demonstrate the use of propaganda it repeats the animals accomplishments in the battle with Frederick over and over?

Answer:

Option C

Political science and ecnomoics

Answer:

The correct answer is:

Explanation:

A magistrate or peace officer has the duty to disperse the crowd.

Hope this helps....

Have a nice day :D

Fourteenth Amendment was the first constitutional amendment to be incorporated and applied to the states.

Anyone born in the country or those who acquired citizenship was given citizenship and equal civil and legal rights under the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. African Americans and former slaves who had been set free after the American Civil War were included in this change.

The first is 'No State may pass or enforce laws that limit the rights or privileges of US citizens' ; second is 'no State may take away someone's life, liberty, or property without providing them with a fair trial' ; and the third one is 'no State may deny anybody living within its borders the equal protection of the law.'

One of the fundamental tenets of democracy is that anyone born in the United States is automatically a citizen of the United States.

To know more about 'Fourteenth Amendment' related questions

visit- https://brainly.com/question/29371683

#SPJ4

No, both Mr. Dela Cruz and Mr. Bentley will not be classified as City Prisoners. Mr. Dela Cruz, who was convicted by the City Circuit Trial Court , of a crime with a penalty of 2years and 5 month will be classified as a City Prisoner.

However, Mr. Bentley, who was convicted by the Municipal Circuit Trial Court, will be classified as a Municipal Prisoner. The classification of prisoners depends on the court that imposed the sentence, with City Prisoners being under the jurisdiction of the City Circuit Trial Court and Municipal Prisoners falling under the jurisdiction of the Municipal Circuit Trial Court.

In the given scenario, Mr. Dela Cruz, who received a sentence of 2 years and 5 months, was convicted by the City Circuit Trial Court. As the sentence was imposed by the City Circuit Trial Court, he will be classified as a City Prisoner. The City Circuit Trial Court has jurisdiction over cases within its city, and individuals convicted by this court will be designated as City Prisoners.

On the other hand, Mr. Bentley, who received a sentence of 1 year and 3 months, was convicted by the Municipal Circuit Trial Court. Since his sentence was imposed by the Municipal Circuit Trial Court, he will be classified as a Municipal Prisoner. The Municipal Circuit Trial Court has jurisdiction over cases within its municipality, and individuals convicted by this court will be designated as Municipal Prisoners.

The classification of prisoners is determined by the court that handed down the sentence, taking into account its jurisdictional scope. Therefore, Mr. Dela Cruz and Mr. Bentley will have different classifications based on the respective courts that convicted them.

Learn more about penalty here : brainly.com/question/31318693

#SPJ11

The null hypothesis should be rejected because the critical value is less than the calculated Value correct interpretation of the chi square analysis using a p value of 0.05

A chi-square test is defined as a statistically significant difference between the expected and observed frequencies.

The chi-square test uses hypothetical facts to determine significant differences between calculated and observed frequencies.

The null hypothesis is rejected because the squared value is less than the first found statistic or calculated value. Therefore the hypothesis is invalid.

To learn more about ‘null hypothesis’, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

A researcher observed that when two heterozygous plants with red flowers are crossed the resulting offspring include plants with red white or pink flower. The researcher proposes the null hypothesis that flower color is the result of independent assortment and incomplete dominance. The researcher calculates a chi square value of 7.3. Assuming two degrees of freedom which of the following is the correct interpretation of the chi square analysis using a p value of 0.05?

When we discuss the juvenile justice system, we frequently give the impression that there is a single, consistent system, yet there are really 50 different systems.

About a century ago, the United States created a separate juvenile justice system with the intention of keeping young offenders out of the hands of the criminal justice system and promoting rehabilitation tailored to the needs of each individual juvenile.

The goal of juvenile justice in the United States is to assist children who come into contact with law enforcement and are accused of breaching the law. It is made up of state and municipal court-based systems. Law enforcement, prosecutors, courts, and corrections—the main pillars of the juvenile justice system—are all highlighted.

Learn more about juvenile Visit: brainly.com/question/25821714

#SPJ4

Answer:

Government-subsidized school understudies have an extent of free-verbalization rights under the First Amendment. Understudies can talk, create articles, store up to shape get-togethers, and even solicitation school experts on issues. The U.S. High Court has said that understudies "don't shed their set up rights to one side to talk unreservedly of talk and verbalization at the school building passage." There is a pivotal separation among public and non-government funded school understudies under the First Amendment. The First Amendment and various courses of action of the Bill of Rights limit the public authority from infringing on an individual's advantages. State-subsidized school specialists go probably as a part of the public power and are called state performers. Taking everything into account, they should go about according to the guidelines in the Bill of Rights. Non-state funded schools, regardless, aren't arms of the public power. Accordingly, the First Amendment doesn't offer affirmation to understudies at educational cost based schools. Notwithstanding the way that administration financed school understudies do have First Amendment openings, the courts license school specialists to coordinate specific sorts of understudy verbalization. For example, school specialists may restrict talk that liberally disturbs the school atmosphere or that assaults the advantages of others. Various courts have held that school specialists can restrict understudy talk that is vulgar. Many state constitutions contain game plans ensuring free explanation. Some state Supreme Courts have translated their constitutions to give more noticeable confirmation than the public authority Constitution. Likewise, several states have gotten laws giving more unmistakable protection to one side to talk uninhibitedly of talk.

Major-party presidential nominations are now determined primarily by the primary election process. In the United States, the primary elections allow registered party members and, in some cases, unaffiliated voters to participate in selecting their party's nominee for the presidential election.

This process involves a series of state-level primary elections and caucuses in which voters express their preferences for a particular candidate.

The primary election process has become the dominant method for selecting major-party presidential nominees over the years. It allows for broader participation and a more democratic approach compared to the previous system, which relied heavily on party leaders and delegates at the national conventions to choose the nominees.

Through primary elections, voters have a direct say in determining the candidate who will represent their party in the general election. Candidates campaign extensively, seeking support from voters across different states and competing to secure the majority of delegates needed to win the party's nomination.

To know more about  presidential nominations refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/31185431

#SPJ11

Answer:

a classify. data can be classified into four levels of measurement

Answer:

Lighter is correct

Explanation:

it contains butane

Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.

A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.

On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.

Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:

2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor

3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.

4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor

5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor

6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor

7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.

Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341

#SPJ1

"The Chimney Sweeper" is a poem written by William Blake, and it contains elements of irony in its depiction of the plight of chimney sweepers during the 18th and 19th centuries in England.

Situational Irony: The poem begins with the speaker, a young chimney sweeper, expressing a sense of contentment and even joy in his situation. He describes his fellow sweepers as "happy" and suggests that their work is not burdensome. However, the reader understands the tragic reality behind this apparent happiness—the young children being forced into dangerous and exploitative labor.

Verbal Irony: The poem employs verbal irony to convey its message. The speaker's words often convey a deeper meaning that contrasts with the literal interpretation. For example, when the speaker says, "So if all do their duty, they need not fear harm," it is ironic because the "duty" he refers to is the hazardous work of chimney sweeping that harms the children.

By utilizing irony, Blake criticizes the harsh realities of child labor and social inequality, urging the reader to recognize the hypocrisy and injustices present in society.

To know more about Chimney Sweeper:- https://brainly.com/question/4462259

#SPJ11

Answer:

no

Explanation:

yes they were right hahaaaaaaa

Answer:

Because intellectual property theft is a non-violent crime, usually corporate and for financial reasons.

Explanation:

Law enforcement is aimed at solving violent crimes, of large proportions that promote physical damage and well expressed. Theft of intellectual property does not fit this type of crime, since it is a non-violent crime, of a corporate nature and that causes financial damage, but does not promote physical and widespread harm. In this case, this type of crime is best addressed by the private security and technology mission.

Answer:The electrical charge goes through high-voltage transmission lines that stretch across the country. It reaches a substation, where the voltage is lowered so it can be sent on smaller power lines. ... The electricity travels through wires inside the walls to the outlets and switches all over your house.

Explanation:

The enforcement and elaboration of U.S. legislation is primarily given to administrative agencies (option c).

These agencies are responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws passed by Congress, as well as drafting regulations and guidelines to further clarify and interpret the laws.

Oversight committees including private citizens and watchdog groups can also play a role in monitoring and ensuring compliance with the law, but they do not have the authority to enforce it.

The judicial branch also plays a role in interpreting and enforcing the law, but this is primarily through the resolution of legal disputes rather than day-to-day enforcement. Ultimately, administrative agencies are the key actors in ensuring that U.S. legislation is effectively implemented and enforced.

Thus, the correct option is c- administrative agencies.

For more such questions on legislation, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/27893557

#SPJ11

Answer:

ok good for him

Explanation:

Answer:

Wells says eyewitness testimony has two key properties: one, it's often unreliable; and two, it is highly persuasive to jurors.

Answer:

A: Senate

B: The House of Representatives

C: Senate

D: The House of Representatives

E: The House of Representatives

F: Both

G: Senate

H: Both

I: The House of Representatives

J: Senate

K: The House of Representatives

The House, according to the Constitution, represents citizens based on district populations, whereas the Senate represents citizens on an equal state basis.

The United States Congress is made up of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.

Members of the House of Representatives serve two-year terms and are re-elected every even year. Senators, on the other hand, serve six-year terms, and elections to the Senate are staggered over even years, so that only about one-third of the Senate is up for reelection at any given time.

The responses to the given questions are

To learn more about The House of Representatives

https://brainly.com/question/747415

#SPJ2

The statement "Private law pertains to personal rights, such as the right to protect one’s own property and interests." is true as private laws are for individual liberty.

Private law also referred to as civil law is a subset of the law that addresses the rights and connections between people or entities. It includes individual rights, such as the right to safeguard one's own assets and interests. Numerous facets of daily life are governed by private law including contracts, property ownership, torts, family law and business dealings.

It focuses on resolving conflicts between private parties and offering remedies for any wrongdoing or rights violations. Public law which deals with issues pertaining to the government and the relationship between the state and its citizens is distinct from private law.

Learn more about Private law at:

brainly.com/question/32182909

#SPJ4

Answer:

Human freedom and equaility

Explanation:

The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.

Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.

On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.

While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.

To know more about obligations.

https://brainly.com/question/32907342

#SPJ11

A law that makes an act illegal after the fact is called an ex post facto law.  and a similar prohibition exists for state governments under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Ex post facto is a Latin term that means "from a thing done afterward." In legal terms, an ex post facto law is a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences or punishment for an action, making it illegal or subjecting it to a greater punishment than when the act was committed. The prohibition against ex post facto laws is rooted in the principle of fairness and due process. It is generally considered unjust to punish individuals for actions that were not illegal at the time they were committed. The United States Constitution, specifically Article I, Section 9, prohibits the enactment of ex post facto laws by the federal government, and a similar prohibition exists for state governments under the Fourteenth Amendment.

learn more about legal

https://brainly.com/question/32393152

#SPJ11

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Gender can play a significant role in determining the limits of our obligations to strangers.

For instance, moms usually shoulder the majority of the burden of parenting their children.

Do moms have different moral obligations than other people? Would you say that a mother leaving her own kids to feed malnourished children in Haiti goes beyond the bounds of moral obligation.

What happens when a mother from Haiti abandons her own children to look after rich children in the first world in order to provide assistance for her family back home.

1) The connection between the agent's actions and the harm that resulted; and 2) The morality of the action without consideration for the effects. Subjects' assessments of the agent's accountability were observed to vary in situations when these two features were at odds, particularly when the injury was not directly caused by the act that was held accountable.

Hence, we can say Gender can be used  determine the limits of our responsibilities to strangers.

To know more about Moral Obligations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31327835

#SPJ1

Answer:I hope that helps!

Explanation: The police cannot search your home or belongings without a warrant, but there are exceptions. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects private citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.