Answer:
D.Trustee
Explanation:
Deed of trust. Title is vested in a third party, the trustee, until the mortgage lien is satisfied.
Officers arrest Fred and advise him of his Miranda rights. Fred understands his rights and verbally waives them. After 20 minutes of questioning, officers figure out that Fred is lying to them and so they tell Fred they will call the local Social Services office and have Fred’s children taken away if Fred doesn’t confess. Thereafter, Fred confesses. Was this confession obtained in violation of the 5th Amendment?
a. No, because Fred was given and waived his Miranda rights.
b. No, because Fred was not entitled to receive Miranda warnings.
c. Yes, because the statement was coerced.
d. Yes, because Fred didn’t waive his Miranda rights in writing.
Discuss your answer.
Answer: C: Yes, because the statement was coerced.
Explanation:
I deeply apologize if my answer was wrong.
Fifth Amendment: Right against double jeopardy. (Prosecuted for same crime twice.)
Grand jury. (Group of people from community that determine if a crime has occurred.)
Cannot be a witness against themselves. (Right against self-incrimination.)
Right to due process.
Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.
Coerced: To obtain (something) by using force or threats.
Examine some of the difficulties in the financial system in Ghana and how it has been addressed?
Answer:
The several banks in Ghana had collapsed. The banks were given license few years ago. The banks were heavily deficient in liquidity and they had instability in financial systems.
Explanation:
There have been mergers of some banks in Ghana which lead to financial system inconsistencies. There was continuous mobilization of fund which resulted in unstable deposits. The challenges have been addressed by Implementing Institution Act of 2016.
Bicycle Accidents: How Do These Accident Claims Work?
To make claims during a bicycle accidents firstly all road users must understand that they have a duty to be very careful and use the road safely and to claim for compensation, they have to prove that the accident was due to the other road users negligent and you got the injuries due their negligent
How do claims work?A claims works when a formal request is made by a policyholder to an insurance company for a compensation to cover for a loss or damages during an accidents
The insurance company will have to verify the claim to check if the accident did not occur due to negligent and then issue an approval for payment to the insured or an approved interested party on behalf of the insured.
Learn more about Insurance on brainly.com/question/4953989
#SPJ1
what is the difference between an executive order and a law?
The manner in which a law is implemented distinguishes it from an executive order.
Either the President of the United States or the Governor of a state may issue an executive order. The President's directives are related to how the federal government is run. They are frequently employed by governors in issues involving public health.
An executive order has legal standing, thus breaking it could have repercussions. Also, executive orders are often issued considerably more quickly than laws. Unlike presidential orders, which cannot be revoked by Congress, laws must be approved by Congress.
Additionally, they are both well-documented and formally recorded. The Code of Federal Regulation, the official compilation of all federal rules and regulations, governs both presidential executive orders and federal statutes.
To know more about "executive order" visit-
brainly.com/question/18973126
#SPJ4
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
how do men and women differ in their political leanings?
Men and women differ in their political leanings in several ways. On average, women tend to be more liberal, while men tend to be more conservative. However, it is important to note that there is significant variation among individuals within each gender group.
1. Party affiliation: Studies have shown that women are more likely to identify as Democrats, while men are more likely to identify as Republicans. This difference in party affiliation can partially explain the differences in political leanings between men and women.
2. Policy preferences: Women generally show greater support for social welfare programs, reproductive rights, and environmental protection, which align with liberal political ideology. On the other hand, men tend to prioritize issues such as national security, economic growth, and lower taxes, which are typically associated with conservative political ideology.
3. Voting behavior: Women have consistently voted at higher rates than men in recent elections, and they tend to vote for Democratic candidates more often than their male counterparts. This voting pattern has been observed in both national and local elections, contributing to the gender gap in political leanings.
4. Political engagement: Women are more likely to participate in civic activities and volunteer for political campaigns, which can influence their political beliefs and preferences. This engagement may lead women to adopt more liberal stances on various issues.
5. Socialization and upbringing: Men and women are often socialized differently from a young age, which can influence their political attitudes and beliefs. For example, traditional gender roles may contribute to men's preference for conservative policies, while women's experiences with gender inequality may lead them to support liberal policies that promote equal opportunities.
In conclusion, men and women differ in their political leanings due to a variety of factors, including party affiliation, policy preferences, voting behavior, political engagement, and socialization. It is important to remember, however, that these trends are not universally applicable to all individuals, and there is a wide range of political views within each gender group.
To know more about political leanings refer here: https://brainly.com/question/27997265#
#SPJ11
in united states versus verdugo urquidez, the supreme court has held that constitutional protections do not obtain in u.s. government actions against foreign nationals on ______________.
In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, the supreme court held that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.
What happened in the case of United States v Verdugo Urquidez?In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, a Mexican national was arrested and his property was searched by U.S. agents. He was then brought to the United States to face drug charges. The defendant contended that his Fourth Amendment rights of the Constitution had been breached by the search and seizure of his house in Mexico, as well as by the search of his vehicle in the United States, without a warrant.
The Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution does not cover illegal searches and seizures carried out by US government officials on foreign soil and that the protections under it do not extend to foreign nationals outside the United States. As a result, the search did not breach the Fourth Amendment.
Henceforth the Supreme Court emphasized in United States v Verdugo Urquidez, that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.
Learn more about U.S. constitutional protections at: https://brainly.in/question/5984704
#SPJ11
Describe the relationship between investigative hearing days and party control of the House and presidency
A description of the responsibilities the offices of the House General Counsel and Senate Legal Counsel played in these investigations is included in the report's conclusion.
What are examples responsibilities?
An obligation to complete a task is one example of a responsibility. Your parents, for instance, anticipate that you will brush your teeth. It is your job to clean your teeth every day since it is "a responsibility" to do so. Another illustration is that your teacher anticipates you to complete your homework promptly and to the best of your ability. Therefore, it is your duty to complete your assignment and do it to the best of your ability.
A duty could be how you are required to behave. For instance, if you go play at the park, your parents anticipate that you won't play in a way that endangers you or another else.
Know more about conclusion visit:
https://brainly.com/question/78686
#SPJ1
state some of the principes of damocracy
- Popular sovereignty
Where the leader/s of a country is chosen by the people (elected democratically).
- Autonomy
The right of a country to be independent and govern itself, either a unitary one where all states is governed by one government or a federal one where autonomy is granted through each state and where each state has its own government.
- Equality
Equality for all people regardless of demographics such as race.
the development of the juvenile justice system was not initially concerned with what?
A disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is...
a) group politics
b) void of expert opinion
c) an increase in programmed costs
d) faster decision making
e) too much brainstorming
The disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is a) group politics.
When a decision-making process involves interacting groups, group politics is likely to come into play. Group politics refers to the dynamics, power struggles, and personal interests that can influence decision-making within a group. Individuals may engage in behaviors such as lobbying, forming alliances, or pursuing personal agendas, which can hinder the overall effectiveness and objectivity of the decision-making process. This can lead to biased or suboptimal decisions that may not necessarily align with the organisation's best interests or the problem being addressed.
Learn more about group politics: https://brainly.com/question/10744844
#SPJ11
Is QAnon a Threat to American Safety?
Please provide an example of a scenario where a police officer would, or would not, be legally entitled to stop and potentially frisk someone. Please explain why this is or is not legal.
Answer:
When Can the Police Stop and Frisk You on the Street?
A look at the history of "stop and frisk," and the circumstances required to make its use legal.
by Marcia Layton Turner
updated September 04, 2020 · 3 min read
Man standing by crosswalk
The United States' “stop and frisk" rule originated from the Fourth Amendment's language regarding unreasonable searches and seizures.
The policy actually allows police to stop and “pat down" anyone they suspect may be committing, have committed, or are about to commit a crime. Their suspicion alone is what permits them to stop you and search you.
The current stop and frisk policy has been legal since 1968, when the Supreme Court ruled in Terry v. Ohio to allow police officers the flexibility to temporarily detain and search someone they suspect has done or is in the process of doing something illegal.
Since then, all 50 states have adopted this ruling in some form.
Unfortunately, rather than rooting out crime, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New York reports that 9 out of 10 New Yorkers who have been stopped and frisked were innocent. Some people see stop and frisk as a form of harassment.
Explanation:
If a police officer suspects you are in some way involved in illegal activity, they have the authority to stop you, whether you're walking, driving, biking, boating, or engaged in some other activity.
“During a stop, you are not under arrest, but you are not free to leave," explains Tod Spodek, managing partner of the Spodek Law Group.
“When an officer stops your car, the officer must have a reasonable suspicion that someone in the car committed a crime, or probable cause to believe the driver committed a traffic violation."
If I have interval-level data, this means I can do which of the following with the responses:
a.classify
b. Average
C. Rank-order
D. All of the above
Answer:
a classify. data can be classified into four levels of measurement
Which of the following is a high risk area for compliance issues
Cyber Security and Data Protection is a high risk area for compliance issues. The development of technology has brought new difficulties and risks associated with compliance issues.
Although it can be challenging for organizations to consistently remain on top of these challenges, issues like risk area data protection and cybersecurity rank among the top worries in the compliance space. A campus activity (which could be a process, department, or function) is considered high risk if it poses risks to the institution's capacity to fulfil its goals and objectives, particularly those relating to compliance issues with all laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures. Fraud, theft, bribery, money laundering.
To learn more about compliance issues, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/27960340
#SPJ1
Which of the following guidelines has HHS established as standards of conduct for agents, brokers, and web-brokers who participate in the Marketplace?
A. Obtain the consent of the individual, employer, or employee prior to conducting an online person search, assisting with of facilitating enrollment through the Marketplace, assisting the individual in applying for APTC and CSRs, and making updates to a consumer's eligibility application or subsequent plan selection and enrollment.
B. Protect consumer's personally identifiable information (PII)
C. Provide consumers with connect information regarding the Marketplace, QHPs offered through the Marketplace, and insurance affordability programs.
D. Refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
The guidelines that the Health and Human Services has established as standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
What is the Health and Human Services?This is a federal service that established the standards of conduct for agents, brokers, and web-brokers who participate in the Marketplace in order to protect against conduct that is harmful to consumers or prevents the efficient operation of the Marketplace
Hence, the guidelines on standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
Read more about HHS
brainly.com/question/2093822
#SPJ1
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Explain why freedom of contract is not always beneficial to all contracting parties
Answer:
A contract assignment occurs when one party involved in a contract, called the assignor, transferred the contract's performance duties and benefits to a third party, called the assignee. The obligations acquired by a contract cannot be transferred to an assignee without the consent of the other party involved (not the assignor), so the assignor can transfer duties to perform and benefits but not obligations.
In this case, Beneficial assigned its contract with Animal Feed to Crop Transport, and delegated its duties to perform and benefits to Animal Feed
Explanation:
kari and lillian, who are citizens of mississippi, are involved in a case related to the adoption of their child. regarding jurisdiction of this case, mississippi state courts have:
Regarding jurisdiction of this case, Mississippi state courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
What is exclusive jurisdiction?
Exclusive jurisdiction in civil procedure refers to a court's power to decide a case without contacting any other courts. Concurrent or non-exclusive jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows for more than one court to exercise jurisdiction over a case. Subject matter is frequently used to define exclusive jurisdiction. Similar to how arbitration clauses are recognized under the New York Convention, the passage of the 2005 Hague Convention indicated the growing worldwide understanding of the necessity to recognize exclusive jurisdiction clauses and related court rulings.
Know more about exclusive jurisdiction- brainly.com/question/6433356
#SPJ4
A young woman goes missing in the area around a state park. Years later, two fishermen happen upon what looks like a human bone sticking out of the riverbank. Investigators immediately think of the young woman, but they need an expert to tell them if the bone is connected to their case. What forensic expert would the investigators call for help in this situation?
Answer: An Anthropologist because they study bones
Explanation: Make sure to add the questions so we know how to answer
what is RA 6675 The Generic Act of 1988
is the type of dental material used when making a custom provisional. Group of answer choices Hydrocolloid
why should the public have access to the technical records
Answer:
Because I feel we should be able to know what's going on but my opinion doesn't matter i learned that in college debate
Explanation:
why are jail staff in most facilities and sheriffs’ departments still paid less than those on patrol?
Jail staff in most facilities and sheriffs' departments are typically paid less than those on patrol due to the difference in duties and responsibilities.
Patrol officers are responsible for responding to emergencies, making arrests, and conducting investigations, which requires a higher level of training and expertise.
Jail staff, on the other hand, are responsible for the supervision and care of inmates, which is a less specialized and less dangerous job.
Additionally, patrol officers typically work in more dangerous and challenging environments, which often results in higher pay. However, it is important to note that pay can vary based on the specific facility or department and the level of experience and education of the individual.
For more similar questions on duties:
brainly.com/question/27871841
#SPJ11
Do you support a second impeachment trial?
Simple.yes. Do you need any information lol?
terrorist financing differs from money laundering because
Terrorist financing and money laundering are both illicit financial activities, but they differ in their purpose and the nature of the funds being handled.
Money laundering is the process of concealing the true source of illegal funds by making them appear to come from legitimate sources.
The goal of money laundering is to enable criminals to use their illegal proceeds without raising suspicion from law enforcement or financial institutions.
Money launderers often use complex transactions and shell companies to obscure the trail of their illicit funds.
Terrorist financing, on the other hand, involves the provision of financial support to terrorist organizations or individuals to carry out acts of violence.
Unlike money laundering, terrorist financing aims to openly fund activities that are illegal and dangerous. The funds may be used to purchase weapons, explosives, or other resources needed to plan and execute attacks.
Terrorist financiers may use a variety of methods to move money, including cash smuggling, hawala networks, or front companies.
While there may be some overlap between the two activities, such as when criminals use money laundering techniques to hide the source of funds used for terrorist financing, the goals and motivations behind each activity are distinct.
Both money laundering and terrorist financing are serious threats to global security and stability, and efforts to combat them require collaboration and cooperation from law enforcement and financial institutions around the world.
Know more about Terrorist financing here:
https://brainly.com/question/25011837
#SPJ11
which of the following is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.
Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.
Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.
The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?
cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money
Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income
Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"
Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:
brainly.com/question/31749142
#SPJ4
Which two of the following persons are exempt from attack?1) Military personnel exclusively assigned to, and engaged in, medical or chaplain duties2) Staff of voluntary aid societies belonging to a neutral country
1) Military soldiers who are only assigned to and performing chaplain or medical tasks. 2) Employees of non-governmental organizations from a neutral nation.
A chaplain is traditionally a member of the clergy (such as a minister, priest, pastor, rabbi, purohit, or imam), or a lay representative of a particular religion, who is employed by a secular organization (such as a hospital, prison, military unit, intelligence agency, embassy, school, labour union, business, police department, fire department, university, sports club), or a private chapel. Although the term "chaplain" was originally used to describe adherents of the Christian faith [need quotation to verify], it is now also used to describe members of other faiths or philosophical schools, as is the case with chaplains serving in the armed forces and an increasing number of chaplaincies at American universities. Numerous laypeople who have acquired professional training in chaplaincy in recent years have been appointed as chaplains at schools, hospitals, businesses, universities, prisons, and other locations to work alongside or in instead of recognized members of the clergy. A multifarity team, secular, generic, or humanist chaplaincy are also terms that are being used more frequently, especially in healthcare and educational settings.
Learn more about chaplain here
https://brainly.com/question/25990222
#SPJ4
Which two of the following persons are exempt from attack?
Describe what lawyers do in 2 paragraph.
What is the nature of goodness in the context of filipino values?
Answer:
Good traditional Filipino values
Enumeration of Filipino values
Family orientation.
Joy and humor.
Flexibility, adaptability, and creativity.
Religious adherence.
Ability to survive.
Hard work and industriousness.
Hospitality.
Explanation: Hope that this helps!!
Is the historian, Arthur Schlesinger, the one who wrote about the powers in government, the SR. or Jr. ? I need to know this for an assignment I'm doing that doesn't say which he is.