An offer is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it. An offer is a proposal made by the offeror to the offeree to enter into a legally binding agreement.
An offer represents the starting point in a contractual agreement, expressing the proposer's willingness to be bound by the terms of the proposed agreement should the other party accept. This willingness is the manifestation of the proposer's intent to create a legally enforceable contract.
In contrast, unilateral intent and bilateral intent refer to the nature of the obligations within a contract, rather than the initiation of the bargaining process. Once an offer is made, it is up to the offeree to decide whether to accept the offer, thus completing the bargain.
Acceptance indicates the offeree's agreement to be bound by the terms of the offer, creating a legally enforceable contract between the parties. Consideration is a separate element of a contract, referring to the value exchanged between the parties in the agreement, such as money, goods, or services.
Although it is a crucial component of a legally binding contract, it is not directly related to the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain as described in the question.
To know more about the willingness refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30834845#
#SPJ11
Option C is correct, An offer is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.
An offer, which conveys the offering party's wish to be bound by the terms of the bargained agreement should the other party accept it, is the first step in any contractual agreement. This readiness is an indication that the proposer wants to create a legally binding agreement. By accepting, the offeree agrees to be bound by the terms of the offer, creating a legal contract that can be enforced in court.
An offer is a proposal made by the offeror to the offeree to enter into a legally binding agreement. The value that the parties trade, like as money, goods, or services, is known as the consideration in a contract. the offeror's intention to be bound by the terms of the offer, should it be accepted by the other party, must be clearly manifested.
To learn more about the manifestation of willingness, click at:
https://brainly.com/question/14970972
#SPJ4
1 All classical music pieces are written out the same way, using
A letters, words and paragraphs.
B
standard notation.
C tempo.
D meter.
Income losses from passive investments related to investments like a REIT (Real Estate Investment Trusts) or some partnerships can be deducted against which type of income on tax returns?
A. Passive Income
B. Ordinary Income
C. Active Income
D. Any type of income
Income losses from passive investments related to investments like a REIT (Real Estate Investment Trusts) or some partnerships can be deducted against passive income on tax returns (A)
Income losses from passive investments like a REIT (Real Estate Investment Trusts) or some partnerships can only be deducted against passive income on tax returns. Passive income is income that is earned from investments or other sources that do not require active involvement or effort from the taxpayer. This includes income from rental properties, dividends, and interest. Income losses from passive investments cannot be deducted against ordinary income or active income, which are earned from wages, salaries, or business profits.
Therefore, the correct answer is A. Passive Income.
To learn more about passive income, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/25914624
#SPJ11
What is the definition of an act in law?
ACT, civil law, contracts. A writing which states in a legal form that a thing has been said, done, or agreed. In Latin, Instrumentum. Merl. Rep.
ACT. In the legal sense, this word may be used to signify the result of a public deliberation, the decision of a prince, of a legislative body, of a council, court of justice, or a magistrate. Also, a decree, edict, law, judgment, resolve, award, determination. Also, an instrument in writing to verify facts, as act of assembly, act of congress, act of parliament, act and deed. See Webster's Dict. Acts are civil or criminal, lawful or unlawful, public or private.
2. Public acts, usually denominated authentic, are those which have a public authority, and which have been made before public officers, are authorized by a public seal, have been made public by the authority of a magistrate, or which have been extracted and been properly authenticated from public records.
3. Acts under private signature are those which have been made by private individuals, under their hands. An act of this kind does not acquire the force of an authentic act, by being registered in the office of a notary. 5. unless it has been properly acknowledged before the officer, by the parties to it.
Residents in Georgia pay a sales tax when they
O get a driver's license.
O go to a state campground.
O go to an amusement park.
O buy a lottery ticket.
The residents will have to pay a sales tax whenever they bought a lottery ticket.
What is a Sales tax?A Sales tax refers to a taxation charged to consumers based on the purchased price of products.
This type of tax is not imposed on getting a driver's license, going to a state campground or going to an amusement park because they are not sales.
Hence, the sales tax will be charged only on lottery ticket.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Sales tax
brainly.com/question/9437038
A blood droplet has a width of 5 mm and a length of 6 mm. What is the
angle of impact?
Explanation:
56 degree angle.
in a negligence action, plaintiff must prove that the defendant failed to act as a reasonable person in the position of the defendant would have acted. true false
The statement "in a negligence action, plaintiff must prove that the defendant failed to act as a reasonable person in the position of the defendant would have acted" is True.In the legal system, negligence is a tort or legal action that occurs when one person breaches a responsibility to act in a certain manner that leads to damages or injuries to another person.
The tort of negligence requires a plaintiff to establish the following elements:1. Duty of Care: The defendant owed the plaintiff a legal duty of care to refrain from causing harm.2. Breach: The defendant breached the legal duty of care that they owed to the plaintiff by failing to act as a reasonable person in the position of the defendant would have acted under similar circumstances.3. Causation: The defendant's negligence was the actual and proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.4. Damages: The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the defendant's negligence.In a negligence action, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant breached the duty of care by failing to act as a reasonable person in the position of the defendant would have acted.
The duty of care can vary depending on the circumstances of the case, but the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's conduct fell below the standard of care expected of a reasonable person in a similar situation.In conclusion, it is correct to say that in a negligence action, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant failed to act as a reasonable person in the position of the defendant would have acted.
To know more about negligence action visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20373662
#SPJ11
Who was Gary Web, and what was his role in the drug war ?
Answer:
A series of expose articles in the San Jose Mercury-News by reporter Gary Webb told tales of a drug triangle during the 1980s that linked CIA officials in Central America, a San Francisco drug ring and a Los Angeles drug dealer.
"You have to understand Central America at that time was a haven for the conspiracy theorists. Christic Institute, people like Gary Webb, others down there, looking to dig up some story for political advantage," Nieves said.
Amongst Webb's fundamental problems was his implication that the CIA lit the crack cocaine fuse. It was conspiracy theory: a neat presentation of reality that simply didn't jibe with real life. Webb later agreed in an interview that there is no hard evidence that the CIA as an institution or any of its agent-employees carried out or profited from drug trafficking.
Explanation:
Answer:
^^Hey there! Gary Webb was a journalist and author who is best known for his investigative reporting on the role of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the Nicaraguan Contra war and the proliferation of crack cocaine in Los Angeles in the 1980s. His work on these topics was published in a series of articles in the San Jose Mercury News in 1996, and later expanded into a book titled "Dark Alliance: The CIA, the Contras, and the Crack Cocaine Explosion."
Webb's work was controversial and sparked a significant public outcry, as it suggested that the CIA had indirectly facilitated the spread of crack cocaine in African-American neighborhoods in order to fund the Contra war in Nicaragua. His reporting was later the subject of significant criticism and scrutiny, and he faced significant professional challenges as a result.
Webb's role in the drug war was as an investigative journalist who brought attention to the issue of CIA involvement in the drug trade and the impact of this involvement on communities affected by the proliferation of crack cocaine. His work has had a lasting impact on public understanding of the drug war and the role of the CIA in this complex and controversial issue.
In, U.S. Supreme Court ruled that school officials may conduct warrantless searches of individuals at school based on
Answer: see below
Explanation:
New Jersey V. T.L.O. 469 U.S. 325 (1985) the scotus ruled that school officials do need a warrant or probable cause to search a student, they only need responsible suspicion
91. When confined to bed, clients should change positions at least every two hours.
(A) True
(B) False
Answer:
Falso
Explanation:
The ruling that schools can censor student publications if there is a legitimate educational concern was issued in which case ?
Answer:
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Explanation:
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, the high court ruled that school officials can censor school-sponsored publications if their decision is “reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical purpose.”
Subraya la opción cuya serie de palabras tiene el mismo significado. A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo b) aumentar, incrementar, disminuir, crecer, ampliar c) defender, atacar, proteger, cuidar, resguardar
Answer:
A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo
b) aumentar, incrementar, disminuir, crecer, ampliar
c) defender, atacar, proteger, cuidar, resguardar
Explanation:
A) Remoto es la única palabra que no sigue la línea de algo de hace años, antiguo y viejo. Remoto es algo que remite a lejanía pero no en el sentido del resto de las palabras. Entonces, las palabras que siguen el mismo significado son: Viejo, Antiguo, Arcaico, Añejo
B) Disminuir es la única palabra que significa lo opuesto a todo el resto. Aumentar, Incrementar, Crecer y Ampliar significan que algo aumenta o crece en tamaño, mientras disminuir es el antónimo de esas palabras.
C) Atacar es el antónimo de la serie de palabras que implican cuidado y protección, el mantener a alguien o a algo seguro. La serie de palabras iguales son: Defender, Proteger, Cuidar y Resguardar.
What are the Warning Traffic Signs?
A warning sign is a particular kind of sign that alerts the viewer to a potential risk, impediment, or circumstance that calls for extra care.
A driver may not immediately notice some of the hazards that are indicated by traffic signs on the sides of the road. At the Turin Automobile Museum, there are primarily warning signs on display (along with some control signs like Do Not Enter). Shape and colours of the utilised road warning sign are: Uses Uses Uses Uses Uses, previously used has utilised in the past, utilises several, absent any data. The shapes of warning traffic signs can vary, but they typically have an equilateral triangle shape with a white background and a heavy red border. They have a yellow backdrop and a black border in the People's Republic of China (Macau and Hong Kong are the exceptions).
Learn more about Republic here:
https://brainly.com/question/9368597
#SPJ4
Maria believes that through her actions, her voice can be heard in government and that she can effect change in government policies. We would say Maria has high levels of
Maria has high levels of Pollyannaism.
Pollyannaism refers to the tendency of a person being blindly or excessively optimistic for the occurrence of a certain task in future. Here, in the given situation Maria's behavior is indicative of high levels of Pollyannaism because of the fact that her actions have not been executed and she is merely in day dream that her actions and voice can change the government policies. There is no source of evidence is available which can proof that any of her believes has taken shape in the change of the reality that is the change in the government policy.Learn more about government policies:
https://brainly.com/question/17492456
all of the following are criteria for determining whether a country is a liberal democracy except 1 point
efficient decision making, people have a consistent set of preferences, obtain the information they need to make an informed decision, weigh their options, and select the course of action that best reflects their beliefs and values in a Liberal democracy.
Such choices are regarded as sensible because it is assumed that they will advance people's self-interest.
Given that research has amply demonstrated that political decision-making practically never adheres to these principles in practice, the rational choice approach is forced to deal with a dilemma.
People lack consistency in their opinions, misuse information, have excessive faith in their own judgment, fail to update previous assessments in light of new information, draw erroneous conclusions from incomplete information, and show prejudice.
To know more about liberal democracy
brainly.com/question/30167511
#SPJ4
All of the following are criteria for determining whether a country is a liberal democracy EXCEPT
A) competitive elections
B) efficient decision making
C) freedom of expression
D) multiple sources of information
E) peaceful transitions of power
The Haitian legal environment is ________..
a. German civil code. b. Pre-Napoleonic French civil code. c.
Spanish civil code. d. All of the above.
The Haitian legal environment is a Pre-Napoleonic French civil code.
What is Pre-Napoleonic French civil code?
The Pre-Napoleonic French civil code is an important civil law that was developed in France in the 1800s. The code laid the foundations for the modern civil law systems that are used today. It was developed as part of the Napoleonic Code and was created to replace the many different laws that existed in France at the time.
The Haitian legal environment
The legal environment in Haiti is based on the Pre-Napoleonic French civil code, which was introduced to the country during the French colonial period. As a result, the legal system in Haiti is closely aligned with that of France, and is based on the same principles of civil law that underpin the legal systems of many other countries around the world.
Learn more about the Haitian legal environment:
https://brainly.com/question/28884650
#SPJ11
Assess how employment laws contribute to termination of
contracts.
Question:
List the Laws relating to employment, in particular
with regard to Employment Relations Act 2004 and what these
legislatio
Employment contracts outline both employers' and employees' rights and responsibilities. They outline the conditions of employment, including the start and end dates as well as the hours worked, pay, and perks.
Termination by Mutual Agreement: In some circumstances, the employer and employee may decide to end a contract mutually. Negotiations, severance payments, or settlement agreements may be necessary.
At-Will Employment: There is a concept of "at-will" employment in nations like the United States, where either the employer or employee may terminate the work relationship at any time, with or without cause, provided that it does not contravene any other laws (for example, anti-discrimination laws).
Notice Requirements: A number of employment laws stipulate that both parties must provide notice before ending an employment agreement. Observation period.
Learn more about Employment Contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/24191862
#SPJ11
And what ever you do it with kindness and love . is it true or false............?
Answer: True
Explanation:
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER!
(AP3X)
Which body of the federal government has members who are elected from a
state to six-year terms?
A. The Supreme Court
B. The Senate
C. The House of Representatives
D. The executive office
Answer:
Senate
Explanation:
What is another name for the first day of winter
Answer:
winter solstice that's all I have
Explanation:
enough
Answer:
Winter solstice
Explanation:
This astronomical event appears on calendars as the first day of winter—but meteorologists have already gotten a head start on the season.
which system awards government programs and benefits based on political loyalty to a party?
The system that awards government programs and benefits based on political loyalty to a party is known as patronage.
This practice is often used by political parties to reward their supporters with jobs, promotions, and other perks in exchange for their loyalty and support.
A change in party control of government necessarily brings new officials to high positions carrying political responsibility, but the spoils system extends personnel turnover down to routine or subordinate governmental positions.
However, patronage can also lead to corruption and unfair treatment of those who do not support the ruling party.
Many countries have implemented reforms to reduce the influence of patronage in government and ensure a fair and transparent system for all citizens.
Read more about Government programs at https://brainly.com/question/31166221
#SPJ11
10. the federal government's practice of spending more than it takes in results in
a. greater dependence on regressive taxes than on progressive taxes.
b. deficit financing.
c. low interest rates.
d. longer fiscal years.
Deficit financing is the practice of the federal government spending more money than it collects in revenue.
What is federal Government's practice?The federal government practices a system of governance that relies on the rule of law, constitutionalism, and the separation of powers. This system is intended to promote a balanced and efficient system of governance while protecting individual liberties. The federal government practices a variety of policies, including providing services and assistance to citizens, regulating industries, collecting taxes, and setting laws. Additionally, it is responsible for protecting national security, managing foreign affairs, and promoting economic growth. The federal government also works with state and local governments to ensure the health, welfare, and safety of its citizens.
This is done to finance government projects and services, and can be offset by borrowing or creating new money. The result of this practice is an increase in the national debt, and a greater reliance on regressive taxes than on progressive taxes. Additionally, since the government is borrowing more money, interest rates tend to be lower than they would be without deficit financing. Lastly, the length of the fiscal year may be extended in order to accommodate the extra borrowing.
To know more about the federal
government's practice click-
https://brainly.com/question/12486516
#SPJ4
which rule would not violate the fair employment and housing act, the unruh act, or the fair housing act? a rule prohibiting occupancy in a particular housing development by persons under the age of:
None of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Unruh Act, or Fair Housing Act (FHA) allow for discrimination on the basis of age. Therefore, a rule prohibiting occupancy in a particular housing development by persons under a certain age would violate all three acts.
Under the FEHA, it is illegal for employers and housing providers to discriminate against individuals on the basis of age.
Similarly, the Unruh Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in public accommodations, including housing.
The FHA also prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in the sale or rental of housing.
However, there are certain exceptions to these laws that allow for age-based housing restrictions in certain circumstances, such as senior housing developments that are specifically designed to meet the needs of older adults. These exceptions are narrow and require specific criteria to be met, so it is important to consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with all applicable laws.
To know more about Fair Employment and Housing Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/29518967
#SPJ4
Are those groups comprised of criminally minded individuals who have used the internet to communicate, collaborate, and facilitate cybercrime?
Cybercriminal Organizations are comprised of criminally minded individuals who have used the internet to communicate, collaborate, and facilitate cybercrime.
Cybercrime is any criminal activity that targets or uses a computer, computer network, or connected device. Most cybercrime is perpetrated by cybercriminals or hackers looking to make money. However, sometimes cybercrime aims to damage computers and networks for reasons other than profit. Cybercrime is a crime involving computers and networks.
Your computer may have been used in a crime or targeted. Cybercrime can put your personal security and financial well-being at risk. Fraud and identity theft (although the increasing use of malware, hacking, or phishing has made it an example of both "computer-targeted" and "computer-as-a-tool" crimes) Information warfare. Phishing - Betrug. spam.
Learn more about cybercrime here
https://brainly.com/question/13109173
#SPJ4
which law is a collection of statutes that regulates the interception of wire, electronic, and oral communications?
Electronic Communications Privacy Act is the law that is collection of statutes that regulates the interception of wire, electronic, and oral communication
The correct answer to this is Option A.
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986 is the collective name for the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Stored Wire Electronic Communications Act.
The Federal Wiretap Act of 1968 was revised by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), which did not cover intercepting computer and other digital and electronic communications but dealt with listening in on talks over "hard" telephone lines.
A number of later pieces of legislation, such as The USA PATRIOT Act, update and clarify the ECPA in order to keep up with the development of new communications technologies and techniques.
These later pieces of legislation also loosen restrictions on law enforcement's ability to access stored communications in some circumstances.
To know more about Electronic Communications Privacy Act, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27973081?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete. The complete question is:
Which law is a collection of statutes that regulates the interception of wire, electronic, and oral communications?
A. Electronic Communications Privacy Act
B, US Copyright Law
C. Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
D. Homeland Security Act
the law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 from using any type of wireless device while driving, except in an emergency situation.True or false
In the United States, the answer is partially true. In most states, there are laws restricting the use of wireless devices while driving, especially for young and inexperienced drivers. However, these laws can vary from state to state, and not all states specifically prohibit the use of wireless devices by drivers under the age of 18.
It is important to note that these laws are intended to improve road safety, as the use of wireless devices while driving can significantly increase the risk of accidents. Driver distraction is one of the leading causes of traffic accidents, and the use of wireless devices can increase distraction and the likelihood of accidents.
In summary, in the United States, many laws restrict the use of wireless devices while driving, especially for young and inexperienced drivers. While not all states specifically prohibit the use of wireless devices by drivers under the age of 18, many laws are designed to improve traffic safety and reduce the risk of accidents caused by driver distraction.
Lear More About Laws for less than 18 years
https://brainly.com/question/13321659
#SPJ11
It is true that the law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 from using any type of wireless device while driving, except in an emergency situation.
According to the law it is illegal for anyone under the age of 18 to use any type of wireless device while driving. This also includes talking on the phone, texting, or surfing the internet. Some states have laws that specifically prohibit texting while driving regardless of age. It would be an only exception in case it is an emergency situation, such as calling 911. If anyone use any type of wireless device while driving, sometimes it may lead to dangerous situations like accidents where they put themselves and others also in danger.
To learn more about law click here https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ1
Brief the system of proportional representation
Explanation:
ROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Sections
HomePolitics, Law & GovernmentPolitics & Political Systems
Proportional representation
politics
Cite Share More
WRITTEN BY
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree....
See Article History
Proportional representation, electoral system that seeks to create a representative body that reflects the overall distribution of public support for each political party. Where majority or plurality systems effectively reward strong parties and penalize weak ones by providing the representation of a whole constituency to a single candidate who may have received fewer than half of the votes cast (as is the case, for example, in the United States), proportional representation ensures minority groups a measure of representation proportionate to their electoral support. Systems of proportional representation have been adopted in many countries, including Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.


Which of the following is not one of the three prongs that must be present to create a fee simple estate?1. Reversionary2. Alienable
3. Devisable
4. Descendible
Which of the following is not one of the three prongs that must be present to create a fee simple estate is Reversionary Option 1.
What is Reversionary?
That is relating to the right, especially of the original owner or their heirs, to possess or succeed to property on the death of the present possessor or at the end of a lease.
A reversionary interest is the right to resume ownership of land if and when certain conditions are met. Reversionary interests have been used for centuries to provide a mechanism for change of ownership if certain conditions set forth in a deed are not met.
The three prongs required for a fee simple estate are Alienable, Devisable, and Descendible.
Hence, the right answer is option 1. Reversionary.
Read more about Estate at https://brainly.com/question/29649911
#SPJ11
Questions 16-20 choose the vocabulary word that best fits the description.
A Cast Off
B-Radial Pattern
C-Pool
D-Artery Spurts
E. Transfer
16. This was created due to fall which resulted in a blow to the head. 17. The carotid artery was damaged creating this blood pattern. 18. Michael stepped in blood as he tried to remove the body. This blood was found on the carpet of his car. 19. Each time Michael stabbed his victim blood hit the wall behind him. 20. Michael then punched his victim on the stab wound, this created a fan like blood stain pattern.
According to the information the vocabulary is related with each meaning.
How to find the explanation for each vocabulary?Here are the explanations for each vocabulary word in relation to the given descriptions:
A Cast Off - This is a bloodstain pattern that occurs when an object in motion (such as a weapon or limb) flings blood off its surface onto a nearby surface. In this case, if the fall resulted in the head hitting an object, the blood from the injury could have splattered and created a cast-off pattern on nearby surfaces.Artery Spurts - This is a type of bloodstain pattern that is caused by the pumping action of the heart, creating spurts of blood with each beat. If the carotid artery was damaged, it would likely create this type of pattern as blood would spurt out with each heartbeat.Transfer - This is a type of bloodstain pattern that occurs when a bloody object comes into contact with a surface, leaving a pattern behind. In this case, Michael stepping in blood and then leaving a bloody footprint on the carpet of his car would be an example of transfer.Radial Pattern - This is a type of bloodstain pattern that occurs when blood is released from a central source, such as a bleeding wound. If Michael's victim was bleeding from stab wounds and standing against a wall, each time Michael stabbed him, blood could hit the wall behind him in a radial pattern.Cast Off - This is again a bloodstain pattern that occurs when an object in motion flings blood off its surface onto a nearby surface. If Michael punched his victim on the stab wound, blood could have been flung off his hand and onto nearby surfaces, creating a cast-off pattern in a fan-like shape.In conclusion, forensic science often relies on the interpretation of bloodstain patterns to help reconstruct the sequence of events leading up to a crime. Understanding the different types of bloodstain patterns and what causes them is crucial in order to accurately analyze and interpret the evidence.
Learn more about forensic science in: https://brainly.com/question/29773304
#SPJ1
A dentist uses silver amalgam to fill the cavity in a patient’s tooth but when the bill is sent to the insurance company, it states that they used porcelain instead. What kind of crime is this an example of?
The example depicts a type of Professional Occupational Crime.
Professional occupational crimes, also referred to as workplace crimes, are defined as offenses committed by a person while doing employment-related duties. Despite the fact that there are many different criminal behaviors that can be classified as occupational crimes, white collar crimes including embezzlement, money laundering, tax fraud, and the exploitation of corporate data or assets are the most prevalent. Occupation-related offenses frequently result in particularly harsh punishments, such as lengthy jail terms, high fines, and the loss of a professional license or practice, so if you have been charged with an occupational crime, it is crucial to speak with a knowledgeable white collar crime attorney who can assist you in mounting a compelling defense.
Learn more about Professional occupational crimes here:
https://brainly.com/question/10997526?
#SPJ9
Gullible, Inc. hires Fakir, who presents all of the statutorily required documents confirming his right to work in the U.S. It turns out that the documents are clever forgeries, and that Fakir is actually an illegal alien. Gullible can raise these facts as an affirmative defense to liability under the IRCA
a. if it failed to undertake a due diligence investigation
b. if it has never been found guilty of accepting forged immigration documents before
c. if it relied in good faith on the genuineness of the documents
d. if Fakir had the legal right to enter the U.S.
e. if it is not a government contractor
Gullible can raise these facts as an affirmative defense to liability under the IRCA if it relied in good faith on the genuineness of the documents. The correct option is c.
Under the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), employers are required to verify the identity and work eligibility of their employees by examining specific documents. If an employer, like Gullible, hires an employee who presents forged documents that appear genuine and reasonable, the employer can raise good faith reliance as an affirmative defense to liability under IRCA.
The employer must show that it acted in good faith and reasonably relied on the documents presented by the employee. However, if the employer knew or should have known that the documents were forged, or if the employer failed to undertake a reasonable investigation, the defense would not be available.
Factors such as prior history of accepting forged documents or being a government contractor may be relevant to determining the reasonableness of the employer's reliance on the documents presented. However, in this scenario, the most relevant factor is whether Gullible relied on the genuineness of the documents in good faith. Therefore, the correct option is c.
To know more about IRCA here:
https://brainly.com/question/29511837
#SPJ4