James says some things are "instruments , not answers to enigmas, in which we can rest" to what is he referring?

1. The three questions you should ask yourself when selecting a topic are:

a. Who is the intended audience?

b. What are my passions, skills, and experiences?

c. What is the event?

2. a) General Purpose: To inform

Specific Purpose: To inform my audience about dog training techniques.

b) General Purpose: To inform

Specific Purpose: To instruct my audience on how to bake a cake.

c) General Purpose: To persuade

Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience to be more concerned about the environment by discussing climate change.

3. A purpose statement simply announces the paper's intent, scope, and direction, whereas a thesis statement must make a claim or argue something.

1. You've probably debated whether a speech topic will work for you, whether you're a new speaker or an experienced speaker looking to expand your offerings. This is especially common in Toastmasters, where you must choose a topic and create a speech based on a specific speech project. I've even had groups ask me to speak to them in recent years because they liked my speaking style but weren't interested in the topics I usually speak on.

2. A general purpose statement and a specific purpose statement are critical components of any speech or piece of writing. The general purpose statement indicates what the main purpose of the speech is. Typically, all speeches fall into one of three categories. To educate, persuade, and entertain. A specific purpose statement is a single sentence that expresses the precise idea that the speaker wishes to or hopes to achieve through his speech. A special purpose statement is a single statement that should be clear and contain only one idea.

3. A thesis statement, in general, expresses the purpose or main point of your essay. Furthermore, the thesis may include the significance of or your thoughts on this topic. It is your promise to the reader about the paper's content, purpose, and organization.

To learn more about a general and specific purpose link is here

brainly.com/question/28520253

#SPJ4

The blog post by a woman claiming to be a distant relative of George Washington would not be credible. Option B.

While the other sources mentioned - an interview with a historian, a news article celebrating George Washington's accomplishments, and a biographical piece in a history magazine - are generally more reliable and likely to provide accurate information, the blog post by an individual claiming to be a distant relative of George Washington may lack credibility.

A blog post is typically a platform where individuals can freely express their opinions or personal experiences without undergoing the rigorous fact-checking or verification processes associated with more reputable sources.

Unless the author of the blog post provides verifiable evidence of their claim as a distant relative of George Washington, it is challenging to establish the credibility and expertise they possess to accurately discuss George Washington's life or artifacts associated with him.

In contrast, an interview with a historian would be a reliable source as historians are trained professionals who have extensively studied and researched the subject matter.

A news article celebrating George Washington's accomplishments would likely be based on verified facts and supported by reputable sources. Similarly, a biographical piece in a history magazine would undergo editorial scrutiny and rely on scholarly research to provide an accurate portrayal of George Washington's career.

When evaluating sources, it is essential to consider their authority, expertise, and reputation within the field, as well as the level of scrutiny and fact-checking they undergo. So Option B is correct.

For more question on credible visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30698164

#SPJ8

Answer:

I believe it's the Bible?

a) Orphan Drug Act (ODA) provides financial incentives, such as tax breaks and exemptions from marketing application fees, to encourage the discovery of medications for rare diseases or disorders that would otherwise go untreated.

The designation of orphan drug does not imply that the therapy is safe and effective, or that it is permitted to manufacture and distribute in the United States.

Other offices within the US Food and Drug Administration conduct this process. Instead, the designation simply implies that the sponsor is eligible for federal government incentives such as market exclusivity and reduced taxes.

In 1982, the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) and others organized an informal coalition of supporters and relatives of patients with rare diseases to lobby for changes in legislation to assist the development of orphan pharmaceuticals, or drugs for treating uncommon diseases.

To know more about pharmaceutical companies:

https://brainly.com/question/16582232

#SPJ4

Correct question:

Which legislation provides for financial incentives to be provided to pharmaceutical companies for the development of medications that would otherwise be unprofitable because they are designed to treat diseases that affect only a small number of people?

a) Orphan Drug Act (ODA)

b) Labors Act

c) Act of 1911

Answer:

Explanation: he asked me "Did i finish my work"?

Answer: slow moving, repetitive/monotonous, boring and somewhat unbearable

Explanation:

Boring and exhausting, especially if long or frequently repeated: difficult work/tasks. When you characterise anything as tedious, you are referring to how uninteresting it is.

The list is lengthy and tiresome. This is a time-consuming yet necessary task. The remainder of the day felt like any other tiresome weight-loss diet. However, this is the whole of it, and it is really dull to read.

We hope your day isn't boring, uneventful, or tiresome! Today's Synonym Sunday terms all have negative connotations related to the word "boring."

It's dull if anything is tiresome. Even the finest lesson can appear monotonous if you are eager to get outside and enjoy the sun. Tedious is an adjective derived from the Latin and English words meaning dullness, tedium.

To know more about Synonyms visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28598800

#SPJ4

Answer:

Unbeknown to Narcissus, the Goddess, Aphrodite, had overheard everything. She decided to punish Narcissus for his vanity and treatment of Echo with a curse: the next time he saw his reflection in the water, Narcissus would immediately fall in love… with himself.

Explanation:

Answer:

Objectivity

Explanation:

The thing that inspired the speaker to begin there is the women that were weaving small threads together.

It should be noted that a speaker simply means an individual who speaks regarding a particular topic or issue.

Here, the speaker was inspired by the natives on Costa Rica. He was inspired by the women that were weaving small threads together.

Learn more about speaker on:

brainly.com/question/26157848

#SPJ4

Some poets utilize sound instruments to elicit an emotional response from the listener.

Sound devices are special tools that the poet might employ in the poem to create certain effects that express and reinforce meaning through sound. Repetition, rhyme, alliteration, and assonance are the four most prevalent sound devices. Authors use a variety of ways to generate mood in their poetry, but the three basic instruments they use are sound, imagery, and diction. The sounds of a poem could be modified by a number of literary methods including: the rhyme, the repeating of sounds that gives a poem its musical tone; alliteration, the use of similar sounds at the start of words or emphasized syllables, such as "silly Thomas sullen ever.

Learn more about alliteration here-

https://brainly.com/question/9160973

#SPJ4

Answer:

the two components of human resource planning are requirements forecasting and availability forecasting. .

Explanation:

Requirements forecasting is the process of estimating the future human resource needs of the organization based on its goals, strategies, and plans. Availability forecasting is the process of estimating the future supply of human resources available internally and externally to the organisation.

Answer: Overall the author uses foreshadowing to create suspense, this is important because it ensures the reader will have enough interest to continue reading throughout the piece. The irony leaves the reader thinking about what actually happens at the ambiguous end, whether the knocking at the door was their son or someone else, using foreshadowing a conclusion can come to a consensus.

Answer:

Explanation:

1.Paraphrasing is writing any particular text in your own words while summarizing is mentioning only the main points of any work in your own words.

2.Paraphrasing is almost equal to or somewhat less than the original text while summarizing is substantially shorter than the original.

3.Paraphrasing may be done for the purpose of simplifying the original work while summarizing is done to mention only the major points without any kind of explanation about the matter.

The essays based on the given question prompt has been provided below:

In "Internment," Samira Ahmed examines oppression, resistance, and community in a futuristic dystopia where Muslim Americans are held captive in camps. The story underscores the dehumanization and oppression of a particular group, while emphasizing resilience and solidarity.

Ahmed shows growth and determination, inspiring readers to stand against bigotry and effect change.

"Shadowshaper" by Daniel José Older explores magic, art, and resistance. "Shadowshaper" blends fantasy and commentary, emphasizing the power of art and community against dark forces.

"Novels 'Internment' and 'Shadowshaper' tackle social issues of oppression, resistance, and cultural identity, depicting unjust internment of Muslim Americans and the use of shadowshaping to reclaim heritage and combat darkness."

Books highlight community and solidarity during adversity. "Internment" and "Shadowshaper" exhibit standing against injustice, embracing heritage, and finding strength in unity. Inspiring stories fight oppression for equality.

Read more about essays here:

https://brainly.com/question/25607827
#SPJ1

The above question wants to analyze your writing skill. For that reason, I can't answer it, but I'll show you how to do it.

It will be necessary for you to read each text to identify the similar and different characteristics between them. You can search for articles that facilitate this analysis and help you find this information.

Learn more about comparing and contrasting texts at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/25631178

#SPJ1

Answer: Cilantro is the most important ingredient in raita

Explanation: i did it on the i-ready test and got it right

Answer:

Cilantro is the most important ingredient in raita.

Its correct on i-ready

Answer:

Tito had pushed me into the open water hydrant

Explanation:

Answer:

D. One cold, winter morning when I went sledding with my friend, I saw a wolf.

Explanation:

It makes the most sense given the context of the paragraph. The sentences seem to be about a wolf protecting his territory.

Option A makes it seem like it would elaborate on the hunt the wolf goes on to get its prey, however this does not flow well with a wolf protecting his territory

Option B looks like it was taken from the middle of a passage. No where do the sentences discuss a mouse so this would not be the answer

Option C once again does not mention a mouse further nor a chase.

Being a proficient liar does not necessarily require a lot of imagination, as it mainly involves the ability to deceive others through false statements or actions.

However, having a vivid imagination can certainly aid in the creation of believable lies and make them more convincing. A skilled liar may draw upon their imagination to craft detailed and plausible stories, scenarios, and excuses that can manipulate others into believing their falsehoods. Therefore, while imagination may not be a requirement for lying, it can certainly be a useful tool for those who wish to deceive others.

In general, being a good liar doesn't necessarily require a lot of imagination, although it can certainly help. A good liar is someone who can convincingly tell a falsehood and make it seem like the truth. This often requires a combination of traits like confidence, charisma, and an ability to think quickly on one's feet.

To learn more about imagination, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/14516625

#SPJ4

Answer:

compound

Explanation:

Answer:

multiple subject

All political movements, including those of African Americans, Native Americans, Chicanos, and others, pursue social justice and equality.

Thus,  these movements all have different histories and experiences, but they all share the core objective of dismantling oppressive, discriminatory, and marginalizing regimes. They demand fair treatment and representation, work to correct past wrongs, and stand up for their rights.

These groups also frequently work to question prevailing narratives that support injustice, promote inclusion, and reclaim and celebrate their cultural history. While their individual goals and approaches may differ, their united desire for empowerment and justice binds them together in the struggle against structural injustice and the quest for a fairer society.

Learn more about political movements here:

https://brainly.com/question/2823656

#SPJ1

The word that is used incorrectly and needs to be fixed is "effect," which should be written as "affect," used as a verb, as further explained below.

"Effect" and "affect" are two words that are commonly confused because they are homophones, meaning they sound the same but have different meanings.

"Affect" is a verb that means to influence or produce a change in something. "Effect," on the other hand, can be both a noun and a verb. As a noun, it refers to the result or outcome of an action. As a verb, it means to bring about or cause something to happen.

So, while affect is about influencing or changing something, effect is about the result or outcome of that change. Remembering this distinction can help avoid common errors in writing and communication.

Learn more about effect and affect here:

https://brainly.com/question/30563844

#SPJ1

A draft of the interview question you could work with for a well known sport personality is;

                                     Field: Basketball

Introduction:

1. Can you tell us a little bit about yourself and how you got started in basketball?

2. You’ve accomplished so much in your career, what has been your biggest motivation to keep going?

Career:

3. Looking back at your career, what would you say was the most challenging moment you had to overcome, and how did you do it?

4.What has been the most significant highlight of your career so far?

5. You have played with and against some of the greatest basketball players of all time, who would you say was your toughest opponent, and why?

Training:

6. Can you describe your training regime and how it has evolved throughout your career?

7. What role does nutrition play in your training? Do you have any dietary restrictions or preferences?

8. What advice would you give to aspiring basketball players who want to reach the top level?

Personal:

9. How do you manage to balance your personal life and career?

10 Away from basketball, what do you enjoy doing in your free time?

Future:

11. What are your future goals in basketball and beyond?

12 Looking back, is there anything you would have done differently in your career?

13. Finally, what message would you like to share with your fans and supporters?

Conclusion:

14. Thank you for your time today. We appreciate your insights and wish you continued success in your career.

When conducting an interview, it's important to be professional, respectful, and curious. The tone should be friendly and engaging, but also focused and purposeful. It's important to listen actively to the interviewee's responses and to ask follow-up questions that dig deeper into their insights and experiences. Overall, the tone should be one of genuine interest and respect for the interviewee and their accomplishments.

Find more useful exercises on interviews here;

https://brainly.com/question/15128068

#SPJ1

Answer:

A Slight Misunderstanding is a short humourous book written by J. B Boothroyd, a popular English writer.

The story has a few humorous instances such as when the protagonist of the story enters the wrong car because it was similar to his car but saw that it contained a woman's handbag but he somehow found the home address of the lady by reading the collar on a dog nearby that barked at him.

He eventually found out that the car was actually his own car that the woman forgot her handbag in.

The situation was funny when he was relating it to the woman's husband because the husband was used to his wife's forgetfulness and carelessness. It was also funny because the only reason the protagonist knew it was actually his car was because of the plate number.

Another humorous incident that happened was when the protagonist entered a wrong car for real when the boot of the car was opened and it was hay that was there instead of fruits, fish, and other groceries.

Explanation:

Under the Persimmon Tree" by Suzanne Fisher Staples is a novel that tells the story of two different women - Najmah, a young Afghan girl, and Nusrat, an American-born Afghan woman - whose lives are affected by the conflict in Afghanistan. In the novel, the adults play a crucial role in shaping the plot and influencing the lives of the two main characters.

Firstly, Najmah's father, Baba, contributes significantly to the plot by allowing Najmah to flee their village and seek refuge in the nearby city of Peshawar. His decision to send Najmah away is motivated by his desire to protect her from the violence and danger that has engulfed their village. Baba's actions set in motion a chain of events that shapes Najmah's fate and ultimately leads her to meet Nusrat.

Secondly, Nusrat's husband, Faiz, is a doctor who works with refugees in the Peshawar camps. His work is crucial to the plot as it allows Nusrat to meet and connect with Najmah, who is one of his patients. Through Faiz, Nusrat becomes involved in Najmah's story and develops a deep connection with her.

Thirdly, Nusrat's brother, Najeeb, is a member of the Taliban and plays a significant role in the conflict that drives the plot. Najeeb's actions have a direct impact on the lives of both Najmah and Nusrat, and his presence in the story highlights the complex and interconnected nature of the conflict in Afghanistan.

Finally, the other adults in the story - including the aid workers, the refugees in the camps, and the Taliban fighters - all contribute to the plot in various ways. Their actions, decisions, and beliefs shape the world in which Najmah and Nusrat live and help to create the narrative tension that drives the story forward.

Overall, the adults in "Under the Persimmon Tree" contribute significantly to the plot by shaping the world in which the characters live and influencing the events that occur. Their actions and decisions highlight the complex nature of the conflict in Afghanistan and help to create a rich and nuanced portrayal of life in a war zone.

In the book hidden figures;

1. Blanche Sponsler was a white "computer" working at the Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory during World War II.

2. Blanche Sponsler left Langley because she got married.

3. Blanche's story highlights the pressure these women were under by showing  societal expectations of the time that placed limitations on women's professional lives, particularly after marriage

The book hidden figures demonstrates the gender roles that existed during that era, which restricted women's opportunities for career advancement and long-term professional growth. It underscores the challenges these women faced in balancing their personal lives with their professional ambitions.

At that time, there was an expectation that married women would leave their jobs to focus on their families and home life. This was a societal norm that affected many women, not just those at Langley.

Find more exercises on hidden figures;

https://brainly.com/question/22573624

#SPJ1

The "Daughters of Liberty" was the name given to a group of women who played an important role in the American Revolution.

The Daughters of Liberty had a "coffee party," which was their take on the Boston Tea Party, where they consumed the coffee.  The Daughters of Liberty, a collective name for women who identified as fighting for liberty during the American Revolution, was the official female group that was established in 1765 to oppose the Stamp Act and subsequently the Townshend Acts12. During the early stages of the American Revolution, a group of political dissidents coalesced in the British colonies in North America4. The Daughters of Liberty had a "coffee party," which was their take on the Boston Tea Party, where they consumed the coffee5. Women were able to affect the political atmosphere of their day by participating in boycotts.

Find out more on the Sons and Daughters of Liberty at

brainly.com/question/13220463

#SPJ11

The word or words modified by the adverb in italics is prepared.

An adverb is a word used in place of a verb and can be used to indicate the intensity, degree, or timing of something else. In the sentence above, the verb prepared is modified by the adverb yet.

This is to show that the action had not yet been prepared for by the country of England. The adverb modifies a verb. So, we would write the letter v. Adverbs can modify verbs, adjectives and adverbs. In the case of the sentence above, it modifies a verb.

Learn more about adverbs here:

https://brainly.com/question/912194

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

pathos

Answer: Ethos

Explanation: Ethos, a rhetorical appeal through the use of credibility and authority, is used in this excerpt as President Roosevelt flaunts his credibility in order to convince the audience that he is qualified and responsible for making the best decision due to his experience.  

In order to illustrate the diverse reasons for those involved in the passage of the 14th Amendment, the author of the article in the Philadelphia Evening Telegraph probably contrasted the "intelligent leading traitors" versus the "humble and seduced masses".

The phrase "intelligent leading traitors" probably alludes to members of the political establishment who at first opposed the passing of the Amendment but later changed their opinions and backed it to advance their own agendas.

The phrase "humble and seduced masses" probably alludes to common people who supported the Amendment after hearing promises of benefits or other inducements.

The author was probably attempting to make a point regarding the objectives of those engaged in the passage of the Amendment as well as the significance of the regular citizen in promoting the rights and protections given by the Amendment by contrasting these two groups.

To learn more about 14th amendment link is here

brainly.com/question/29793577

#SPJ4