Jeff is driving from Florida to Georgia and is pulled over by the Georgia Highway Patrol for speeding. The patrol officer searches Jeff’s car and finds 5 pounds of marijuana. He is tried and convicted for trafficking across state lines in a U.S. District Court. He appeals arguing it was an illegal search. Where should his case go next?
Answers
Answer: it would depend on the situation.
Explanation:
Unfortunately I don’t have enough info on this alone to make a good call but I can give you this...
The police officer doesn’t have the right to improper searches. That being said the officer may ask for consent to look in the car, but if he is not given permission than he cannot without reason. There are some exceptions however. Police dogs for instance are very good at smelling, and although this problem doesn’t specifically say our officer used a dog, a dog could very well have smelled the drugs. If the dog alerted the officer, then he has a right to search the car. Ultimately I can’t be sure but this is what I will say. The officer was in the wrong. What the man had in his car was plenty illegal (in most states, assuming he went to court would say it was illegal in this one) but regardless he shouldn’t have had his stuff browsed by the officer. The court case would most likely favor the man as he would probably win saying the officer didn’t ask for consent. He still would most likely end up in prison for possession of illegal narcotics and the officer could face a punishment like being fired. Hope it helps.
Related Questions
What statements about Ancient Judea are correct?
Choose all correct answers.
A. It was controlled by Rome beginning in 63 B.C.E.
B. It was part of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants.
C. It was at the crossroads of trade routes east and west.
D. Its people embraced Hellenic culture.
Answers
Explanation:
The correct statements about Ancient Judea are:
A. It was controlled by Rome beginning in 63 B.C.E.C. It was at the crossroads of trade routes east and west.why?
Option A is correct because Ancient Judea came under Roman control in 63 B.C.E. after the Roman general Pompey conquered the region.
Option C is correct because Ancient Judea was located at the crossroads of trade routes connecting the east and west, which made it an important hub for trade and cultural exchange.
Option B is not correct because while Ancient Judea is significant in the biblical narrative and is associated with the land promised to Abraham and his descendants, this statement oversimplifies the complex historical and religious aspects surrounding the land and its ownership.
Option D is not correct because the people of Ancient Judea, particularly the Jewish population, had their own distinct culture and religious practices. They did not embrace Hellenic (Greek) culture to the same extent as other regions under Greek influence. The Jewish people maintained their religious traditions and had conflicts with Hellenistic influence during certain periods.
Please Help me (I'll give brainlest) (LIMITED)
Answers
Answer:The answer is B
Explanation:
A lot of people with pets go on summer vacation so it makes more sense that it would be B
hey, you guys can you help??? please asap
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation: Hope this helps
Answer:
Long coastlines
Explanation:
Because it was the only option that had water or "sea-based" training areas
plsss helpp will mark brainliest! :) 12 points
Answers
The answer is Francisco Pizarro (D).
Answer:
He was Francisco Pizarro
BRAINLIEST FOR THE CORRECCT ANSWERS!!!!!! How does the rule of law affect society? Check all that apply.
A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes.
B. It always prevents lawmakers from abusing power.
C. It ensures the separation of powers.
D. It governs how policies are created.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers.
Answers
The correct options are:
A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes.
C. It ensures the separation of powers.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers.
Explanation:
The rule of law refers to the idea that everyone is equal under the law and that no one is above it. It helps to promote fairness and justice in society by providing a framework for resolving disputes and holding people accountable for their actions.
Here are the options that correctly describe how the rule of law affects society:
A. It influences people’s behaviors and attitudes. - The rule of law sets a standard for how people should behave and encourages them to follow the law to avoid consequences.
C. It ensures the separation of powers. - The rule of law helps to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful by ensuring that each branch has its responsibilities and limitations.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers. - The rule of law requires that lawmakers follow the same laws as everyone else, preventing them from abusing their power and ensuring that they are held accountable for their actions.
Option B is incorrect because the rule of law does not always prevent lawmakers from abusing their power. It helps to prevent abuse of power, but it is not foolproof.
Option D is also incorrect because the rule of law governs how laws are enforced, not how policies are created.
Hence, the answers are A, C, and E
C. It ensures the separation of powers.
E. It ensures that the law applies to lawmakers.
The rule of law is a fundamental principle that ensures that all individuals and institutions are accountable to the law, and that no one is above the law. It influences people's behaviors and attitudes by providing a framework for acceptable conduct, and by establishing clear consequences for violations of the law. It ensures the separation of powers by limiting the authority of each branch of government, and by requiring that each branch operate within its designated sphere of influence. Finally, it ensures that the law applies to lawmakers by subjecting them to the same standards and consequences as other citizens. However, the rule of law does not always prevent lawmakers from abusing power, nor does it govern how policies are created.
true or false please help
Answers
Answer:
I am going to say.... Yes
Explanation:
the answer will be false
HELP QUICK! I GOT 5 MORE MINS
The Federalist Papers was a collection of essays written by John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton in 1788. The essays urged the ratification of the United States Constitution, which had been debated and drafted at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. Imagine you were writing one of these essays: what would you have written to convince the citizens of the United States to ratify (pass or put into effect) the new Constitution?
Answers
can you send me a picture from the less
150= e + 42 what dose e equal to?
Answers
Answer:
108
Explanation:
Because 150-42=108
Therefore
e=108
Hope this helps
2. In the context of the text, how has America changed over time? How has America’s
treatment of Mexican Americans changed? Has it changed dramatically? Cite evidence from the text, your own experience, and other literature, art, or history in your answe
Answers
Historically, Mexican Americans have faced various forms of discrimination and marginalization in the United States. During the early 20th century, Mexican Americans experienced widespread segregation, economic exploitation, and limited access to education and healthcare. The era of the Bracero Program (1942-1964), which brought Mexican laborers to the U.S., also involved exploitative working conditions and unequal treatment.
However, it is important to note that America's treatment of Mexican Americans has not been uniform or static. Over time, there have been important shifts and progress towards greater inclusivity and civil rights. The Chicano Movement of the 1960s and 1970s advocated for Mexican American rights and led to increased political activism, educational reforms, and cultural pride. The movement aimed to challenge discrimination and promote social, political, and economic equality.
Legislative changes have also played a role in improving the treatment of Mexican Americans. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, for example, provided legal protections against discrimination and expanded political participation. These landmark laws benefited Mexican Americans, along with other minority groups, by prohibiting racial discrimination in various aspects of public life.
In recent decades, there have been efforts to recognize and celebrate Mexican American culture and contributions. Mexican American literature, art, and history have gained recognition and representation, providing a platform for sharing diverse perspectives and experiences. Institutions and organizations dedicated to preserving Mexican American heritage and promoting cultural awareness have also emerged.
While progress has been made, challenges and disparities persist. Mexican Americans continue to face socioeconomic inequalities, educational disparities, and instances of discrimination or prejudice. Immigration policies and debates surrounding border security have also influenced perceptions and treatment of Mexican Americans.
In summary, America's treatment of Mexican Americans has changed over time, but it is important to recognize that progress has not been uniform or without challenges. Efforts towards greater inclusivity, civil rights, and cultural recognition have shaped the landscape, but disparities and issues of discrimination persist. Understanding this complex history requires considering a range of sources, including personal experiences, literature, art, and historical accounts.
Answer:
Explanation:
America has undergone significant changes over time, with its treatment of Mexican Americans being a particularly salient example. In the early twentieth century, Mexican Americans experienced substantial discrimination and marginalization. This treatment was often rooted in a perception of Mexican Americans as inferior and in need of control. However, in the latter half of the century, there has been a marked shift in attitudes towards Mexican Americans, with greater acceptance and integration into American society.
The emergence of the Mexican American Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s marks a turning point in the treatment of Mexican Americans. This movement sought to address the systemic discrimination against Mexican Americans, challenging the exclusionary practices of white-dominated institutions and advocating for equal rights. By the 1980s, the Mexican American community had made meaningful progress, with greater political representation, educational attainment, and access to economic opportunities.
However, this progress has been uneven, and challenges remain. Even in the 21st century, Mexican Americans face discrimination in areas such as housing and employment, and are disproportionately affected by poverty and lack of access to healthcare. Moreover, the Trump administration's anti-immigrant policies, including the separation of families at the border and the termination of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, have further exacerbated the challenges faced by Mexican Americans.
Despite these ongoing challenges, there is evidence of continued progress and increasing acceptance of Mexican Americans. For example, in recent years, Mexican American culture has become more mainstream, with greater appreciation for Mexican cuisine, music, and art. In addition, the rise of Mexican American representation in politics, media, and entertainment has helped to challenge stereotypes and promote greater understanding.
In conclusion, the treatment of Mexican Americans in America has changed dramatically over time, with significant progress made towards greater equality and acceptance. However, challenges remain, and ongoing efforts are needed to address discrimination and promote greater inclusion. By drawing on evidence from the text, personal experience, and other literature, art, and history, it is clear that understanding the history and ongoing struggles of Mexican Americans is essential to promoting a more just and equitable society.
DO NOT look at other answers on brainly. THEYRE WRONGG!!
Which of these statements about the Great Awakening and the Second Great Awakening is most accurate?
The Great Awakening had a more widespread impact than the Second Great Awakening.
The Second Great Awakening occurred only in New England's traditional colonial religious groups.
Both the Great Awakening and the Second Great Awakening occurred after the American Revolution.
The Second Great Awakening contributed to the antislavery and women's rights movements.
Answers
Answer:
D. The Second Great Awakening contributed to the antislavery and women's right movements.
Explanation:
The Second Great Awakening is known for spreading the idea of universal salvation and religious free will. Socially, it set the stage for major social change by introducing ideas of abolition, feminism, and temperance.
Which is an invention that improved safety for railway passengers?
refrigerated rail cars
Pullman sleeping cars
time standardization
air brakes
Answers
Answer:
Pullman sleeping cars, and time standardization.
Hope this helps
Sincerely yours: Bravo
Explanation:
Invented by George Westinghouse year of 1896
Who was Annie Oakley
Answers
Annie Oakley was an American sharpshooter who starred in Buffalo Bill's Wild West show. Oakley developed hunting skills as a child to provide for her impoverished family in western Ohio. At age 15, she won a shooting contest against an experienced marksman, Frank E. Butler, whom she later married in 1876.
H*! For Coffeyville, Kansas!
Source: 1880s Pamphlet put by the Union Pacific Railroad
Is the source reliable, and biased? Why or why not for each answer? What does it tell us?
Answers
the _______ and the travels of the man _____________ increased trade and travel in the Middle Ages.
Answers
Please help me the question is right here. ---> What was one famous event that happened in the world when Frida was alive? how did it affect her?
Answers
Answer:
Warren G. Harding is elected U.S. president. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is founded. Prohibition begins and passage of the Nineteenth Amendment gives women the right to vote.
Explanation:
Which statement correctly explains the relationship between state and local governments?
State and local governments work independently of each other.
State and local governments share responsibilities to an equal degree.
State governments receive power based on the decisions made by local governments.
State governments decide which regulations are the responsibility of local governments.
Answers
Answer:Federalism also invulves some limitations on state authority, particularly invulving relationships between state governments.
Explanation:
"The dying Tartars, stunned and stupefied by the immensity of the disaster brought about by the disease, and realizing that they had no hope of escape, lost interest in the siege. But they ordered corpses to be placed in catapults and lobbed into the city in the hope that the intolerable stench would kill everyone inside. What seemed like mountains of dead were thrown into the city, and the Christians could not hide or flee or escape from them, although they dumped as many of the bodies as they could in the sea."
—Gabriele de’ Mussi
Which of the following statements about the Middle Ages is best supported by the excerpt?
A.
Disease brought an end to trading.
B.
Disease was used as a weapon.
C.
Disease did not have a significant impact on societies.
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
disease was sadly used as a weapon.
What does morally wrong mean? What would someone who argued that slavery was morally wrong say about why slavery should end?
Answers
Answer: Morally wrong acts are activities such as murder, theft, lying, and breaking promises. Other descriptions would be that they are morally prohibited, morally impermissible, acts one ought not to do, and acts one has a duty to refrain from doing. Morally right acts are activities that are allowed.
Explanation:
Bar chart titled: Population Growth in New York City, 1800-1890. The chart shows a bar for 1800 which is pink totalling 79,215. A bar for 1810 which is light blue totalling 119,743. A bar for 1820 which is dark blue totalling 152,056. A bar for 1830 which is violet totalling 242,278. A bar for 1840 which is blue-green totalling 391,144. A bar for 1850 which is light green totalling 696,115. A bar for 1860 which is yellow totalling 1,174,779. A bar for 1870 which is light orange totalling 1,478,103. A bar for 1880 which is orange totalling 1,911,698. A bar for 1890 which is red totalling 2,507,414.
Use the chart titled "Population Growth in New York City, 1800-1890" to answer the following question:
In which year did the population of New York City first pass one million?
1810
1830
1860
1870
Answers
Answer:
1860
Explanation:
Just look at the lowest population number over one million.
↓What are three ways that God speaks to us today?↓
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Words We Hear
The first way God speaks is the one that’s most often associated with hearing his voice: words we hear. While we would all love to hear an ‘audible’ voice, hearing God’s voice speak in this way appears somewhat rare and particularly reserved for those moments when we’re about to step out into the traffic! The word ‘audible’ itself may indeed be a misnomer – according to my doctoral research, most of those who have experienced it, say it would not have been heard by those around them (See Waiting for God to Speak Out Loud? Think Again). Mostly it seems, the Spirit speaks to us inaudibly and internally – with a message that sounds much like our own thoughts – i.e the ‘still small voice’ of Elijah’s experience (1 Kings 19:9-13).
When God speaks in words, he may give us a single phrase or he may use full sentences. He may use a wordplay (eg. Jeremiah 1:11-12) or give us a riddle that calls us to ponder (Numbers 12:8). Often he’ll ask a question to get us thinking (1 Kings 19:9, 2 Chronicles 1:7) and as the conversation continues, he reveals something more significant later on.
2. Pictures We See
The second way God speaks is in pictures that we see. As God said through the prophet Jeremiah; “Which of them has stood in the council of the Lord to see or to hear his word?” (Jeremiah 23:18, italics mine). We hear his message through words, but we see his message through pictures.
At first, this may seem an unusual way to speak, but we need to remember picture language is the most basic of languages. When children first learn to read, we give them a picture book to practise with – not the Oxford Dictionary. Further, imagery is the most expressive way to communicate which is why it is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. Perhaps this is why God communicates in this way so often in the Scriptures, particularly in the Old Testament where dreams and visions comprise ⅓ of the content (Read: Dreams – God’s Favourite Form of Communication).
When God speaks in pictures, his message comes in dreams when we’re sleeping or visions when we’re awake. Sometimes the picture speaks symbolically and requires interpretation (see for example; The Meaning of Vehicles in Dreams). Other times, the scene is more literal.
Sometimes God’s visual messages are full of riddles, poetry and allegorical forms that are not easily interpreted or measurable. These can be compared to the parables of Jesus which use images or scenes to communicate an idea. Walton suggests that the reason word pictures are used by God is to engage the right side of our brains.1 (This idea was touched on in the podcast: Are Women Better at Hearing God’s Voice?)
Communication in picture form is a way of speaking that the Western church often finds difficult to accept. Writers like Dallas Willard2 and Wayne Grudem3 have gone so far to say it is not a valid way to hear God’s voice. The reasons are primarily historical – an unfortunate product of Reformation thinking that downplayed the so-called mystical forms of spiritual experience. In fact, imagery is the most common form of communication in the Scriptures and can be the most powerful and creative way of all (Read Why God Speaks in Dreams and Visions or listen to this podcast as an example).
3. Emotions We Feel
Finally, God’s messages may come packaged as emotions we feel. In other words, we sense what God is saying to us. The emotion of the Holy Spirit is felt physically and this in itself communicates a message.
So the presence of hope may invade us, comforting us and calling us forward (Galatians 5:22-23, 1 Corinthians 14:3). Peace becomes a guide to lead us (Colossians 3:15) and a deep-seated conviction may turn us around (John 16:8). A friend of mine with a ministry in healing often experiences a sense of sadness when she meets someone who the Holy Spirit wants to touch in a profound way.
One of the reasons why dreams can be such powerful communicators is because the emotion we experience in them becomes part of the message. Daniel felt deep anguish when he first experienced his visions (Daniel 10:1-9), John found himself weeping (Revelation 5:4) and Peter was revulsed by what he had seen in his trance (Acts 10:14). Of course on the other hand, feelings of guilt, shame, fear or condemnation are never a part of God’s communiqués to us.
So God speaks to us in words, pictures and emotions. There are other forms too – although these are not as common. In my doctoral studies, I’ve interviewed people who have heard from the Holy Spirit through the senses of taste and smell! God packages his message to us in a myriad of forms. He is a masterful communicator who knows how to get his message across to those who are listening.
Prompt # 4: Write a hook sentence about the most exciting vacation destination you can think of.
Answers
Sandy beaches and picture perfect sunsets, Hawaii is the perfect place to take your vacation.
A trip to Jimineria will undoubtedly alter your life!
What is a hook sentence?A hook is an introductory part of the first sentence—in an essay that aims to pique the interest of the reader and encourage them to continue reading. It is a sentence or collection of sentences that captivates readers' interest in your essay or research paper.
A hook piques someone's curiosity. You want the reader of your essay to be intrigued by what comes next. Additionally, hooks help an introduction stand out.
A question, quotation, statistic, or anecdote are a few various forms of hooks that can be used to do this. The first one or two phrases of an essay or article generally serve as the hook.
A powerful statement hook makes a bold assertion about your subject. It ties in with the thesis statement and highlights how significant your essay or paper is.
Learn more about hook sentences, from:
brainly.com/question/11904892
#SPJ2
The Peloponnesian Wars had devastating, lasting effects on Greece. Describe the long-term effects the Peloponnesian Wars had on Athens, Sparta, and the rest of ancient Greece. Be sure to use details to support your answer. Two sentences
Answers
Answer:
i think they had food shortages
Explanation:
in the war u have to feed the solders.
and then thay has hospital bills sry only in 7th grade
. Explain the achievements of the Portuguese and Spanish during the Age of Exploration and their influence on non-European civilizations.
Answers
Answer:
The Spanish and the Portuguese were the first European nations to touch and colonize the Americas. The interaction between the natives of the Americas and the Spanish specifically were absolutely vile. The Spaniards decimated entire populations of Native Americans in the Carribean. The Portuguese on the other hand initially took interest in Newfoundland but quickly abandoned that area for the lush coast of modern day Brazi. They constructed many settlements along the coast of Brazil. the Portuguese also had numerous skirmishes with the native inhabitants of South America and also brought over African slaves; they intermarried with the natives, giving birth to a unique mulatto ethnic group.
Explanation:
Answer:
The voyages of Spain and Portugal began the exploration and expansion in America that finally turned both into a powerful European empire.
Explanation:
The Silk route was dominated by the Muslims in the Middle East, which often led in the clash and unrest between the two religion (Christians and Muslims).
What year did the french and indian end?
ANSWER NOW YOU GET BRAINLEST!
Answers
The United States has a representative democracy. Which of the following best describes a representative democracy?
A.
People elect officials to represent them.
B.
People only vote on certain issues.
C.
People are not allowed to vote at all.
D.
People vote directly on every issue.
Answers
Answer: A
Explanation:
Representative means that they are electing someone to represent them. Democracy means vote. Put them together and you get representative democracy.
The correct answer is A. In a representative democracy, such as the United States, people elect officials to represent them in government. This means that the general public does not vote directly on legislation or other public issues, but rather elects members of Congress and other representatives to vote on their behalf in government.
HELP HELP HELP
ARE MONOPOLYS POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE FOR SOCIETY
Answers
Answer:
positive
Explanation:
How many years are represented on the timeline?
Answers
Why were some people opposed to the war with Mexico?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Because Northern Whigs feared that war with Mexico would result in the United States gaining new territories in the southwest, which would encourage the expansion of slavery.
Question
Who was the slave that sued his master claiming that he was free because he was taken to a free state?
-
Homer Plessy
Frederick Douglass
Dred Scott
Samuel Worcester
Answers
Answer: Dred Scott.
Explanation: In 1846, an enslaved Black man named Dred Scott and his wife, Harriet, sued for their freedom in St. Louis Circuit Court. They claimed that they were free due to their residence in a free territory where slavery was prohibited. The odds were in their favor.
Justifiable for the United State to drop the atomic bombs on Japan?
Answers
Answer:
While some argue that the use of atomic bombs was necessary to end the war quickly and save lives, others believe that it was a disproportionate and unnecessary act of violence that caused immense human suffering. The debate over the justification of the bombings continues to this day.
Explanation:
Answer:
The United States dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was not justifiable, since history has proven many times over that solving long term issues through violence will only most likely result in one of two solutions. The anger against each side lasts for at least as long as the issue was around. Or the other, it will be 'solved' for a short time, and even then will it only come back to more disagreements among the people, causing more violence, or better, just verbal debates and disagreements, although that rarely happens in large issues among nations.
When the US dropped the bombs, they were expecting a quick surrender of Japan, although it would have been better with less violence, talking it out, or even a smaller-range bomb, that wouldn't kill so much of the population and destroy so much land. The United States dropped the bomb for a personal benefit of a lower amount of American lives lost, contradicting the idea amongst most people to preserve all human life, and prevent death from occurring as much as possible. The action was personally considered an 'allegation', not legally, among many people; many others believe that it was necessary and justifiable. It would be difficult to gainsay others opinions on this matter, although you can certainly attempt to proselytize.
Partial Rebuttal for a more beneficial answer:
After dropping the first bomb, Japan had still not surrendered, enticing the United States to repeat the action. To have two bombs dropped on your own country after being warned would most likely make you want to surrender or obey the warring nation. In the end, it turned out to be a gain for the United States, and a great loss for Japan, basically the overall idea of the people of the United States.