State offices of the department of justice usually set prices for natural monopolies in their jurisdictions.
Is it true that a private company is the sole authorized manufacturer of an item or service if the government so declares?A business that has been granted a monopoly status by the government is referred to as a legal monopoly. A certain good or service is provided by a legal monopoly at a set cost. It may be either privately run and subject to government regulation, or both privately run and subject to government regulation.
Are natural monopolies subject to government regulation?In most instances of natural monopolies that the government permits, there are regulatory bodies in each area to act as the general public's watchdog. Usually, public commissions or state-run departments of public utilities are in charge of regulating utilities.
How might a natural monopoly be governed by the government?Government control over monopolies is possible through Limiting price increases is known as price capping. mergers are governed. destroying monopolies.
Know more about jurisdictions:
brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Discuss your feelings regarding Tocqueville's concept of a "tyranny of the majority." Do you think that this is a serious problem for democracies? Why or why not? How do you think this concept should be handled? Note that the concept of an oppressive majority can take many forms, including some you may not have thought of before, such as economic classes. Try to avoid thinking in terms of race or gender, and think more broadly about the various ways that we can all fall into a majority or minority status depending on the situation.
The "tyranny of the majority" is a serious problem for democracies as it undermines equality and individual rights, and it should be addressed through safeguards, inclusive decision-making, and fostering empathy.
What are the key features and implications of the "tyranny of the majority" concept in democracies, and how can it be effectively addressed and mitigated?Tocqueville's concept of a "tyranny of the majority" refers to the potential danger in democracies where the majority can impose its will on minority groups, leading to the suppression of their rights and interests.
In my opinion, the "tyranny of the majority" is indeed a serious problem for democracies as it undermines the principles of equality and individual rights that are fundamental to a just society.
It can manifest not only in terms of race or gender but also in economic classes, political ideologies, or any other characteristic that creates power imbalances.
To address this issue, it is crucial to establish strong safeguards to protect the rights of minority groups and ensure their voices are heard.
This can be achieved through mechanisms such as constitutional rights, independent judiciary, and inclusive decision-making processes that encourage dialogue and consensus-building.
It is essential to foster a culture of empathy, understanding, and respect for diverse perspectives to prevent the tyranny of the majority from overpowering the rights and freedoms of minority individuals and groups.
Learn more about tyranny of the majority
brainly.com/question/32863539
#SPJ11
what should I do today
Answer:
sumthin fun
Explanation:
have a kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk day
Answer:
Do something you will not regret, hang out with friends or spend time outside
Explanation:
Have fun!
According to the constitution a writ of habeas corpus may not be suspended under what conditions.
According to the constitution, a writ of habeas corpus may not be suspended under normal conditions unless there is a rebellion or invasion, and if the public safety requires it.
Writ of Habeas Corpus is a fundamental principle of the United States legal system. The Constitution states that habeas corpus is a crucial legal instrument for protecting individual freedom against arbitrary state power. The Constitution specifies that this right may only be suspended in cases of rebellion or invasion and when public safety requires it.
The writ of habeas corpus is an essential right because it protects individuals from arbitrary or unjustified imprisonment. The suspension of habeas corpus is usually a significant political event since it implies that the government is no longer bound by legal constraints to maintain law and order in society.
During a time of rebellion or invasion, the government may need to suspend the writ of habeas corpus to deal with the crisis effectively.
Learn more about writ of habeas corpus from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/29748417
#SPJ11
Hearing is a process, and listening is
a process.
Answer:
Hearing is a PHYSICAL process,and listening is a MENTAL process.Explanation:
#hopeithelpsmark me as your brain liest plsIn which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Large prosecutors’ offices generally employ what type of prosecution?
a.
vertical
b.
streamlined
c.
directed
d.
horizontal
Large prosecutors' offices generally employ vertical prosecution. This type of prosecution involves assigning a single prosecutor or team of prosecutors to handle a case from start to finish, including pre-trial, trial, and appeals processes.
This allows for greater continuity and consistency in the prosecution's strategy and ensures that the prosecutor handling the case is intimately familiar with all aspects of it.
Vertical prosecution is especially useful in large prosecutors' offices, where cases can be complex and involve multiple defendants, charges, and evidence. With a vertical prosecution model, prosecutors can specialize in specific areas of criminal law and develop deep expertise in their field. Additionally, vertical prosecution allows for more efficient case management, as one prosecutor can handle all aspects of a case rather than multiple prosecutors handing off different stages of the case.
Overall, vertical prosecution is a highly effective model for large prosecutors' offices that seek to maximize efficiency, consistency, and expertise in their criminal prosecutions. It is an important tool for ensuring that justice is served in an effective and equitable manner.
Learn more about prosecution here:
https://brainly.com/question/31676783
#SPJ11
How would you explain gender differences in the crime rate ? Why do you think males are more violent than females?
the basis for zoning and other land use control laws is:
The basis for zoning and other land use control laws is to regulate and control the use and development of land in order to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the public.
Zoning laws typically divide a jurisdiction, such as a city or county, into different zones or districts, each with specific permitted uses, restrictions, and requirements. This helps to ensure that incompatible land uses are separated and that the overall character and quality of the community are preserved. Zoning laws may also regulate factors such as building heights, setbacks, parking requirements, and other aspects of development.
Other land use control laws, such as environmental regulations and building codes, also serve to protect public health, safety, and welfare by regulating the impact of development on the environment and ensuring that buildings are constructed to meet certain standards for safety and quality.
Learn more about development here:
https://brainly.com/question/28011228
#SPJ11
a defamation suit for a famous person is harder to win than a defamation suit for a regular person. true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A defamation suit is the act of attacking one's reputation, although someone could defame someone, it isn't easy to prove for non famous people, as they wouldn't have to worry about being affected Income-wise or in General, although it's an unfair assumption, our criminal justice systems do has it's flaws.
What would happen if you do not obey the law and then not obey a SWAT officer
Disobeying a law order of a police officer carries higher penalties to those who refuse to follow orders lawfully issued by an officer of the law. It’s a second-degree misdemeanor, meaning its punishable by up to 60 days in jail, six months of probation and/ or a $500 fine.
Explanation:
In general, explain how the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news.
Answer: In general, the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news by recognizing that the freedom of the press is an essential part of a democratic society. The courts have held that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to gather and disseminate news, and that this right is not limited to members of the traditional news media. However, the courts have also recognized that this right is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the courts have held that journalists may be required to testify in court under certain circumstances, such as when the information they possess is relevant to a criminal investigation. Overall, the courts have generally been supportive of the right to gather news, recognizing its importance to a free and democratic society while also balancing it against other important interests, such as public safety and the administration of justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
Some people think that the First Amendment gives them the right to go anywhere and ask anything in the name of journalism. They believe that they can sneak into private property, record confidential conversations, or demand access to government secrets. Well, the courts have a different opinion. They have ruled that the First Amendment does not grant a special privilege to the press that overrides other laws and rights. They have said that journalists must respect the privacy, property, and security of others, and that they cannot use illegal means to obtain information. The courts have also recognized that some information is legitimately classified or restricted for national security or public safety reasons. So, the next time you see a reporter trying to break into a military base or a celebrity's home, don't be surprised if they end up in jail instead of on the front page.
FAST Which is the best reason for why it is important to keep personal information private online?
to prevent becoming the target of a scam
to ensure strangers do not approach them
to prevent others from using it dishonestly
to stop people from following them online
Answer:
I thank the best one would be to prevent others from using it dishonestly
Explanation:
if someone uses your information it not just hurt you but the people around you its safe to keep your personal information personal
Answer:
B
Explanation:
ed2020
Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial. They say it is a question of competence. What does this most likely mean?
A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
B. The evidence in Kendall’s case is inconclusive and doesn’t prove anything.
C. Kendall is an expert witness who has testified many times before.
D. The police think it will hurt their case if Kendall chooses to testify.
In a case whereby Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial and say it is a question of competence means that A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
What is a trial ?A trial can be described a the formal examination of evidence which is been done in the court by the judge that is in charge and this been performed when the jury is available so that the guilt in a case of criminal can be known.
It should be note that in the case above the question came out to know how fit is Kendall might be .
Therefore, option A is correct.
Read more about Detectives at:
https://brainly.com/question/26059088
#SPJ1
Who filed a 1966 supreme court case because he was arrested and interrogated without being told of his rights?.
what role correctional officials have to play in offenders life?
Answer:
The Correctional Official is the single most important person who mediates between an offender and society. The Official is expected to be a good role model for others in her or his presence. It is this official who holds the power over an offender's head. S/he can use this power to humiliate, and degrade the offender
according to the quote, what is the likely effect of the court’s ruling in the bakke case?
According to the quote, the likely effect of the court’s ruling in the Bakke case is while racial preferences are allowed, severe racial quotas are not permitted in college admissions.
What was the Bakke case?The case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 concerned whether preferential treatment for minorities could reduce educational opportunities for whites without violating the Constitution. The case was a turning point for the United States Supreme Court.
According to the passage, the petitioner's goal is to create a diverse student body. Although strict racial quotas are not permitted, colleges may consider race when making admissions decisions.
To learn more about the Bakke case, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3476986
#SPJ1
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was,
Writing for the court in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), a case weighing whether race can be considered in college admissions, Justice Lewis Powell wrote:
"Preferring members of any one group for no reason other than race or ethnic origin is discrimination for its own sake. This the Constitution forbids. . . . The . . . goal asserted by petitioner is the attainment of a diverse student body. This clearly is a constitutionally permissible goal for an institution of higher education. . . . The freedom of a university to make its own judgments as to education includes the selection of its student body."
According to the quote, what is the likely effect of the Court's ruling in the Bakke case?
Identify the true statement/s of the following options A. Immanuel Kant advocates virtue ethics B. Religious teachings are necessarily the origin of ethical principles C. Epicurus prioritize body pleasure to mind pleasure D. None
d. none.
Option a is incorrect as Kant advocates for deontological ethics; option b is incorrect as ethical principles can have various origins; option c is also incorrect as Epicurus prioritizes mental pleasure over physical pleasure.
why is it important to be ethical in your studies
Which passage from the Declaration of Independence reflects the
Enlightenment idea of the rule of law?
A. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
O B. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.
C. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may
define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
D. These United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and
Independent States; ... they are Absolved from all Allegiance to
the British Crown, and ... all political connection between them
and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved.
Which of the following is not true about the answer in pre-trial procedures
Answer:
what is the followin questions?
Explanation:
What important labor legislation was passed by california in 1975.
Answer: The California Agricultural Labor Relations Act (CALRA) is a landmark statute in United States labor law that was enacted by the state of California in 1975, establishing the right to collective bargaining for farmworkers in that state, a first in U.S. history.
What is Populist vote?
Answer:
Populism refers to a range of political stances that emphasize the idea of "the people" and often juxtapose this group against "the elite" or "the establishment".
Plz follow me and Mark me as brainlest please please
How a bill becomes a law? (10 steps!)
Answer: Heyaa! ~
Here is how a bill becomes a law!
Explanation:
Step 1: The bill is draftedStep 2: The bill is introduced. Step 3: The bill goes to committee.Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill. Step 5: Committee mark up of the bill. Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill.Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber. Step 8: The bill goes to the president.Step 9: Overriding a vetoStep 10: NOW A LAW!Hopefully this helps you! ~
Answer:
Here is how a bill becomes a law
Explanation:
Step 1: The bill is drafted
Step 2: The bill is introduced.
Step 3: The bill goes to committee.
Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill.
Step 5: Committee mark up of the bill.
Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill.
Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber.
Step 8: The bill goes to the president.
Step 9: Overriding a veto
Step 10: NOW A LAW!
Why is Locard's Principal significant to forensic science? How does it guide investigations?
According to the Locard's Principal concept of forensic science, both items that the criminal takes to and takes away from the crime scene can be utilized as forensic evidence.
What is Locard's Principal?According to Locard's Trade Principle, whenever two objects come in contact, tiny material will exchange.
This obviously comprises fibers, but it also includes other microscopic components like soil, pollen, paint, and hair.
Exchange Principle of Locard's the material exchange between two items that takes place whenever two objects come into touch.
Skilled witness. A person the court determines possesses trial-related expertise above what would be anticipated of the typical layperson.
Therefore, Locard's Principal significant to forensic science.
Learn more about Locard's Principal here:
https://brainly.com/question/23154090
#SPJ1
true or false the body often naturally seeks rest in the afternoon, between 1:00-4:00 p.m
Answer: it's true. Have a great day...
Explanation:
An organization just completed a security audit. Your division was cited for not conforming to x. 509 requirements. What is the first security control you need to examine?.
The first security control that needs to be examined in relation to X.509 requirements is the implementation of a valid and trusted certificate authority (CA) infrastructure.
X.509 is a widely adopted standard for public key infrastructure (PKI), which includes digital certificates used for secure communication. To conform to X.509 requirements, the organization must ensure that a robust CA infrastructure is in place. This involves evaluating the CA's policies, procedures, and practices for issuing, managing, and revoking digital certificates.
Additionally, it is essential to review the CA's compliance with industry best practices, such as key management, certificate validation, and secure storage of private keys. By examining the CA infrastructure, the organization can address the cited non-conformance and improve its adherence to X.509 requirements.
Learn more about Organization
https://brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ11
Deferring to another court’s decision on a prior matter in order to decide on a new controversy is known as:
Answer:
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis requires that cases follow the precedents of other similar cases in similar jurisdictions.
Explanation:
Answer:
American courts follow the doctrine of stare decisis, which requires them to defer to previous cases on similar issues. Such cases are referred to as "precedents." Part I of this Commentary will provide an overview of precedent's role in the American legal system.
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
Leteisha McCarthy had a confirmed two-night reservation at the Oracle Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts. The nightly rate for Oracle was $175.00. Unfortunately, when Ms. McCarthy arrived at the front desk to check-in, the hotel explained that it did not have a room available. Multiple guests in a block of rooms had decided to add another night to their stay. The hotel did not offer Ms. McCarthy an alternative and the only available accommodations she was able to find were at a nearby hotel called the Oasis, which had a nightly rate of $300.00. Having no other options, Ms. McCarthy registered for a two-night stay at the Oasis and spent $35.00 on a cab ride to get there. When she arrived home, Ms. McCarthy sent a demand letter to the Oracle Hotel insisting that she be reimbursed for the full cost of her two-night stay at Oasis, plus cab fare. Under the law, Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect:
a.
$630.00, the full cost of two nights at Oasis plus cab fare.
b.
$600.00, the full cost of two nights at Oasis as Ms. McCarthy is not entitled to cab fare.
c.
$380.00, the full cost of two nights at Oracle, plus cab fare.
d.
$285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.
Under the law, Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect:d. $285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.
What is the law about?Ms. McCarthy had a confirmed two-night reservation at the Oracle Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts, but upon arrival, she was informed that the hotel did not have a room available for her. She had to book a stay at a nearby hotel, the Oasis, which had a higher nightly rate of $300.00. She is now claiming reimbursement from the Oracle Hotel for the full cost of her two-night stay at the Oasis ($600.00) plus the cost of her cab ride ($35.00), which would come to a total of $635.00.
Therefore, Under the law, the answer to the question of what Ms. McCarthy should be able to collect would depend on the contract between her and the Oracle Hotel, as well as the laws of the state where the hotel is located. The most accurate answer would be d. $285.00, the difference between the cost at Oasis minus the cost at Oracle, plus cab fare.
Learn more about law form
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
T/F: abolishing parole is an effective crime reduction policy.
The given statement "Abolishing parole is not an effective crime reduction policy" is False because Parole is a process that allows inmates to be released from prison before completing their full sentence under certain conditions, such as good behavior and participation in rehabilitation programs.
It serves as an incentive for inmates to improve their behavior while in prison and offers a way to monitor and manage their reintegration into society. Research has shown that abolishing parole can actually increase crime rates. Without the possibility of parole, inmates have little incentive to behave well while in prison, and may become more violent and disruptive.
Additionally, without the opportunity for early release, inmates may become more desperate and less motivated to participate in rehabilitation programs, which could increase their likelihood of committing future crimes.
Furthermore, abolishing parole could also lead to prison overcrowding, which is a significant problem in many states. Overcrowding can make it difficult for correctional staff to maintain order and provide adequate rehabilitation programs, which can further increase recidivism rates.
In summary, abolishing parole is not an effective crime reduction policy. Instead, policies that focus on improving rehabilitation programs and providing incentives for good behavior while in prison have been shown to be more effective in reducing crime rates.
To know more about Abolishing parole here
https://brainly.com/question/27783569#
#SPJ11
What does The 48 Laws of Power teach you?
A lot of history's most well-known power struggles are referenced in The 48 Laws Of Power to demonstrate what power looks like, how to obtain it, how to protect yourself from others' power, and, most importantly, how to effectively use and maintain it.
The 48 Laws of Power: What Are the Benefits?They improve morale, infuse an atmosphere of vigor, and they garner praise and attention. Additionally, they are useful weapons to use against adversaries and rivals in order to put them on the back foot and force them to take reactive rather than proactive action.
How realistic are "The 48 Laws of Power"?The 48 Laws of Power is not realistic nor truthful in the strictest sense. It's false since the laws are
They are maxims teased out from ancient-world examples which might apply to some modern circumstances, but which badly backfire in many others.
To know more about history's visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1462956
#SPJ4