Answers
Mary Marshall committed a misdemeanor.
Define misdemeanor.A misdemeanor is a category of crime that is penalized by law. A misdemeanor is often a crime that carries a sentence of less than one year in prison. Misdemeanors are typically punished by community service, probation, fines, and jail for less than a year.
As opposed to a misdemeanor, which is merely punishable by detention in a county or municipal jail and/or a fine, a felony is a crime that is serious enough to be punished by death or a sentence in state or federal prison.
The difference between a crime and a misdemeanor is only quantitative, offenses are minor social dangerous offenses .
To know more about misdemeanor, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20348390
#SPJ1
Related Questions
1. Critically discuss the investigation and prosecution of on-line child abuse crime in the UK. Your discussion should include a comparison with the investigation and prosecution of on-line child abuse crime in ONE other country.
Marks are awarded for:
• Knowledge of methods of assessing seriousness of on-line child abuse, for example, the COPINE Index and Sentencing Advisory Panel scale.
• Knowledge of key legislation providing for on-line child abuse offences taking account of technological capabilities.
• Ability to critically compare effectiveness of methods for investigating and prosecuting on-line child abuse offences in the UK and ONE other country.
Answers
Answer:
I think abuse is bad
Explanation:
honey im not going to write an essay sry I have college to do and IM going to a bts concert sry
Do you believe that prisoners inside the jail still enjoy certain types of freedom inside their prison cells?
Answers
Yes, prisoners have limited freedoms within their cells, but their overall freedom is heavily restricted due to incarceration.
Within their cells, prisoners have limited freedoms such as the ability to engage in certain activities and solitude. However, the confining environment of incarceration severely restricts their freedom. While they still have access to basic personal rights they are restricted from moving around and communicating in order to maintain security.
The purpose of this supervised environment is to promote rehabilitation, control inmate behavior and ensure safety. It is critical to understand that each prison and jurisdiction has a different level of freedom. The distinct regulation of inmates lives emphasizes societal boundaries and criminal goals highlighting the distinction between individual freedoms within cells and the broader context of imprisonment.
To know more about prisoners here
brainly.com/question/31358311
#SPJ2
Which branch of the military requires there law enforcement officers to complete a single source background investigation
Answers
Formal authority is
A. an established organization, especially one providing a public service.
B. the ability to cause others to behave as they might not otherwise choose
to do.
C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
the process and method of making decisions for groups.
Answers
Answer: C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
Explanation:
Formal authority is the power that is given to a leader by an organization.
__________ is the approach to changing labor law in the united states that most closely aligns with united kingdom's model of voluntary unionism.
Answers
"Right-to-Work" is the approach to changing labor law in the united states that most closely aligns with the united kingdom's model of voluntary unionism.
This legislation allows workers to choose whether or not they want to join or financially support a union as a condition of employment. This approach is in contrast to the "closed shop" model where workers are required to join or financially support a union as a condition of employment. The Right-to-Work approach is seen as promoting worker freedom and choice, and it has been implemented in several US states.
Employees may join voluntary unions at any time and may leave them at any time, usually with some type of notice.
Learn more about Right to work :- https://brainly.com/question/14358718
#SPJ11
Which case represented the first time the supreme court reviewed and ruled on acts of the other branches of government?.
Answers
Marbury v. Madison, arguably the maximum crucial case in Supreme Court history, became the primary U.S. supreme-court case to use the precept of "judicial review" -- the energy of federal courts to void acts of Congress in warfare with the Constitution.
It's Written in 1803 through Chief Justice John Marshall, the selection performed a key function in making the Supreme Court a separate department of presidency on par with Congress and the executive. The information surrounding Marbury have been complicated. In the election of 1800, the newly prepared Democratic-Republican celebration of Thomas Jefferson defeated the Federalist celebration of John Adams.
It's growing an ecosystem of political panic and Adams appointed a huge variety of justices of peace for the District of Columbia whose commissions have been authorized through the Senate, signed through the president, and affixed with the reputable seal of the government. The commissions have been now no longer delivered, however, and while President Jefferson assumed workplace March 5, 1801, he ordered James Madison, his Secretary of State, now no longer to supply them. William Marbury, one of the appointees, then petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus, or criminal order, compelling Madison to expose purpose why he need to now no longer get hold of his commission.
Learn more about supreme court visit: brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
What's the case represented when the first time the supreme court reviewed and ruled on acts of the other branches of government?.
during which phase of the trial would legal counsel summarize the evidence and arguments made during the trial and explain what inferences should be drawn from the evidence presented? presentation of evidence cross-examination closing arguments direct examination
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The phase of the trial during which legal counsel summarizes the evidence and arguments made during the trial and explains what inferences should be drawn from the evidence presented is called the "closing arguments" phase.
Closing arguments occur after both sides have presented their evidence and have completed the examination and cross-examination of witnesses. During this phase, each side's legal counsel has an opportunity to address the judge or jury and to summarize the evidence and arguments made during the trial in an attempt to persuade them to reach a particular verdict.
In addition to summarizing the evidence and arguments, closing arguments may also include an analysis of the law and how it applies to the case, as well as any other factors or considerations that may be relevant to the judge or jury's decision. The purpose of closing arguments is to provide a final opportunity for each side to make their case and to convince the judge or jury to rule in their favor.
The phase of the trial during which legal counsel summarizes the evidence and arguments made during the trial and explains what inferences should be drawn from the evidence presented is the closing arguments.
During closing arguments, the lawyer will provide a summary of the evidence presented during the trial and explain how it applies to the relevant law.
They will then provide an argument for why their client's position should be accepted by the court. They may also use analogies and other forms of rhetoric to further explain their points.
To know more about legal counsel click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30061988#
#SPJ11
what is philosophy?
Answers
Answer:
Philosophy is the systematized study of general and fundamental questions, such as those about existence, reason, knowledge, values, mind, and language. Such questions are often posed as problems to be studied or resolved.
Explanation:
hope this helped you
Which example represents a reserved power?
O A. to open new naval bases
O B. to close post office branches
O C. to declare war on foreign countries
O D. to establish licensing for school teachers
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
B
What are the benefits and drawbacks to giving one leader total contro2
Answers
Identify one international regulation or United States federal law that applies to the harvesting of marine food resources and explain how that regulation or law helps to manage marine species.
Answers
International regulation that applies to harvesting marine food resources is the "Endangered Species Act/ESA prohibits the harm or harvesting of endangered species" and protects habitats.
Fisheries around the world are dominated by the following species: herring, cod, anchovy, flounder, tuna, shrimp, mullet, squid, crab, salmon, lobster, scallops, and oyster. Also in high demand are mollusks and crustaceans. Not all fish that are caught are consumed as food.
The four biological groupings of marine mammals are the ones that follow: sirenians (manatees and dugongs), pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, and walruses), and marine fissipeds (polar bears and sea otters).
To learn more about marine species
https://brainly.com/question/23711729
#SPJ4
Who can sign for financial responsibility for you to get your Driver License? Check all that apply.
-Legal Guardian
-Parent
-Any Responsible Adult
Answers
The answer is your legal guardian and parent
Answer:
A. Legal Guardian
Explanation:
Which staffing policy results in executives who are comfortable working in a number of cultures?
Answers
The staffing policy that results in executives who are comfortable working in a number of cultures is the "geocentric staffing" policy.
Geocentric staffing is a strategy where a company seeks to recruit and promote individuals regardless of their nationality or country of origin. It focuses on selecting the most qualified individuals for key executive positions without any restrictions based on their home country. By adopting a geocentric staffing policy, organizations prioritize competence and skills over nationality, allowing executives to have a broader understanding and experience of different cultures. This policy promotes diversity and enables executives to adapt and navigate effectively in various cultural contexts. Executives under a geocentric staffing approach are likely to possess cross-cultural competencies, including cultural sensitivity, adaptability, and the ability to manage diverse teams. They are comfortable working in different cultures and are better equipped to lead multinational operations, fostering global collaboration and achieving organizational goals in diverse markets.
Learn more about Geocentric staffing here: brainly.com/question/32374807
#SPJ11
What is the idea of a state ignoring or failing to enforce national laws called?
Answers
The idea of a state ignoring or failing to enforce national laws is commonly referred to as "lawlessness" or "anarchy".
Anarchy can be some type of rule where people are not given any right to involve in political duties and the king is the supreme power this type of rule is opposite to the monarchy where the king looks after his people's welfare and rules his land without any discrimination.
In political science, lawlessness is sometimes referred to as "state collapse" or "governance failure". When a state is unable or unwilling to enforce its laws, it may result in a lack of security and social order, leading to chaos and insecurity.
To know more about lawlessness
brainly.com/question/231680
#SPJ4
A homeowner looked out his front window one day and saw a neighbor standing on a narrow ledge on the second story of the house across the street. He also saw a ladder lying on the ground beneath where the neighbor was stranded. The homeowner ran out and picked up the ladder and placed it against the side of the house. However, he set it atop a patch of ice. As the neighbor started down the ladder, a rotten rung broke and he fell to the ground and was injured. If the neighbor sues the homeowner for damages for his injuries, will he recover
Answers
In this situation, it is possible that the homeowner could be held liable for the neighbor's injuries. This is because the homeowner took action by placing the ladder on the ice, which could be considered a negligent act.
Negligence occurs when someone fails to exercise reasonable care, causing harm to another person. If the neighbor can prove that the homeowner's actions directly led to their injuries, they may have a valid claim for damages.
However, it ultimately depends on the specific laws and circumstances of the jurisdiction where the incident occurred. It would be advisable for the neighbor to consult with a lawyer to determine their legal options.
Know more about negligent act:
https://brainly.com/question/31454038
#SPJ11
4. Escola, a waitress, was injured when a bottle of soda exploded in her hand while she was putting it into the restaurant's cooler. The bottle came from a shipment that had remained under the counter for thirty-six hours after being delivered by the bottling company. The bottler had subjected the bottle to the method of testing for defects commonly used in the industry, and there is no evidence that Escola or anyone else did anything to damage the bottle between its delivery and the explosion. Escola brought an action against the bottler for damages. Since she is unable to show any specific acts of negligence on its part, she seeks to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Should she be able to recover on this theory? Explain.
Answers
Answer:
possibly
Explanation:
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.
Which statement best characterizes the partisan differences in public opinion?
a. Democrat and Republican voters strongly disagree on several issues.
b. Democrat and Republican voters strongly disagree on a few issues.
c. Democrat and Republican voters do not disagree on many issues.
d. Democrat and Republican voters strongly disagree on almost all issues.
Answers
The statement that best characterizes the partisan differences in public opinion is option a. Democrat and Republican voters strongly disagree on several issues. While there may be some issues on which both parties agree, there are also several issues on which they hold vastly different viewpoints.
They hold contrasting viewpoints in debates and discussions on topics such as healthcare, immigration, gun control, climate change, and social policies where Democrats and Republicans often have opposing views. Additionally, partisan differences can influence public opinion, shaping people's beliefs and policy preferences based on their political affiliations. This partisan polarization has increased in recent years, leading to greater divisions between the two parties and their voters. These differences in public opinion can have significant implications for policy-making and elections, as each party seeks to appeal to its base and sway undecided voters. Overall, the partisan differences in public opinion are a significant factor in American politics and shape the direction of the country.
Learn more about Democrats here:
https://brainly.com/question/14320124
#SPJ11
After reviewing Whitehead v. Usa-One, Inc. 595 So. 2d 867 (Ala. 1992), do you believe USA-ONE had a legal duty to protect Whitehead and Prewett from sexual assault or do you agree with the Court? Explain.
Answers
The word court comes from the French cour, an enclosed yard, which derives from the Latin form cōrtem, the accusative case of cohors, which again means an enclosed yard or the occupants of such a yard.
What is the meaning of Court?A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the power to hear and decide issues involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military conflicts.
The Latin form crtem, the accusative case of cohors, which again implies an enclosed yard or the tenants of such a yard, is derived from the French word cour, which signifies an enclosed yard.
Learn more about the Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/5684503
#SPJ1
What are the considerations involved in evaluating the credibility of sources? Select all the correct answers.
A) the qualifications and reputation of the writer or organization
B) the cost to purchase the source
C) the use of supporting evidence and logical conclusions
D) the internal consistency
Answers
Answer:
C
Explanation:
corina believes the lizard ban by the federal aviation administration (faa) is not a law because it is an administrative agency rule. is she correct?
Answers
Yes, Corina is correct that the lizard ban by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is not a law, but rather an administrative agency rule.
Administrative agencies, like the FAA, are given the authority to create rules and regulations by Congress. These rules and regulations have the force of law, but they are not technically laws.
They are created by the agency to help enforce and implement the laws passed by Congress. So, while the lizard ban may be enforceable and have the same effect as a law, it is technically an administrative agency rule.
To know more about Federal Aviation Administration, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30319685#
#SPJ11
Question 5 of
When you drive in the city, there is a lot going on. Which of the following a driver must do?
Answers
Answer:
The driver should focus on his driving, or there is a change of a car accident.
What are the three broad areas of forensic science? A. archeology, biology, and physics B. physics, chemistry, and dentistry C. paleontology, biology, and physical science D. biology, chemistry, and physical science
Answers
Someone correct me if I’m wrong
Answer: D
Explanation: i searched
Help 8 and 9 ,10 thanks
Answers
Answer:
8) no
9) resisting arrest
10) eluding officer
 is a spouse responsible for the other spouses credit card debt when they die
Answers
Casey Martin was a golfer on the PGA Tour who, due to an illness, needed a golf cart to move around the course. After being denied permission to use a cart, Martin sued the PGA. Many of the players on the tour objected to the suggestion that Martin should be allowed to use a cart. Which of the following objections to Martin’s being allowed to use the cart is an expression of teleological reasoning?a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.” c) “The PGA is a private organization. The courts should not tell a private organization what to do.” d) (a) and (b). e) (a), (b), and (c).
Answers
Answer:
d) (a) and (b).
Explanation:
Teleology is any philosophical account of the purpose of a thing
Teological reasoning has to do with finding a reason to explain the phenomena in relation to purpose they serve instead of their causes.
From the scenario given, Martin was refused permission to use a cart to play golf due to an illness and the objections to Martin's use of the cart are a0 a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.”
Answer: A
Explanation:
In this type of negligence, both parties are found to be equally at fault and therefore neither side can recover damages.
Answers
Answer:
Until relatively recently, tort was one of the areas on Corporate and Business Law that caused candidates the most difficulty. In recent sessions, the tort answers have tended to be stronger, but there is also evidence of some confusion between tort and contract, with negligence-based material frequently arising in answers to contract questions.
There’s not one target net worth value that is universally considered to be “rich” or “wealthy.” But right now, Sanya’s net worth is $12,000. Her goal is to have a net worth of at least $100,000 before she turns 35.
Answers
Setting specific financial goal, such as increasing one's net worth, is a great way to work towards financial security and stability.
What is security?Security refers to the measures taken to protect people, information, assets, and systems from harm or unauthorized access. It involves the use of various techniques and technologies to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of resources. Security is essential in today's digital age as threats to information and systems have become increasingly sophisticated and prevalent.
Common security measures include encryption, firewalls, intrusion detection systems, access controls, and security audits. Security is a complex and constantly evolving field, and it requires ongoing efforts to stay ahead of potential threats. The goal of security is to provide a safe and secure environment for individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.
To learn more about net worth, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16004568
#SPJ1
Complete Question
Use a student loans to finance education in order to earn a higher salary.Use a mortgage to buy a house that appreciates substantially in value. Take a personal loan to launch a small business or side hustle that allows her to save or invest more
There's not one target net worth value that is universally considered to be "rich" or "wealthy." But right now, Sanya's net worth is $12,000. Her goal is to have a net worth of at least $100,000 before she turns 35.Explain one way that using credit could help Sanya achieve her goal?
These theorists would be most interested in studying how objects (like a cop's badge or gun) play a role in impression management. Question 6 options: a) Functionalist b) Symbolic interactionist c) Feminist d) Conflict theorist
Answers
A symbolic interactionist would be most concerned with the parts these objects play in impression management. Thus, option (b) is correct.
What is management?The term “management” refers to the act of managing. The management of the business activities. Management is the basis of art, science, and the profession. Management are they manage the organization.
According to the symbolic interactionist was the concerned of objects play in impression management. The symbolic interactionist was the understanding of the human action and society.
As a result, the significance of the symbolic interactionist are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on management, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29023210
#SPJ1
a property owner who owns his property in fee simple does not have to abide by zoning regulations. group of answer choices true false
Answers
Owning a property in fee simple, which confers unlimited ownership, enjoyment, and transfer of interests in the real estate, does not mean that the owner will not abide by zoning regulations. So the statement is FALSE.
The property owner must abide by zoning regulations, deed, or subdivision restrictions and covenants. The owner must not infringe on the public welfare with the use of the property.Otherwise, a property in fee simple means that the owner can:
do whatever he likes with the propertyuse the property sell the property to another personrent it out instead of outright saleallow heirs to inheritand ownership is not limited in time.Thus, ownership of property in fee simple confers the highest ownership right in real estate.
Learn more about property in fee simple at https://brainly.com/question/17276804
Are there limits to the right to cure? Does a breaching party have the right to cure the breach, or can the non-breaching party proceed directly to a damage claim?
Answers
Answer:
The overview of the particular question becomes demonstrated in the following portion on the clarification.
Explanation:
There seem to be limitations to something like the obligation to heal. Here rational duration seems to be the limit. An infringing party shall have the opportunity to remedy the infringement regardless of any non-confirmation given the period to fix or rectify the infringement having not terminated unless the infringing community notifies the non-infringing party of its determination to remedy the infringement and therefore remedies the infringement throughout the defined timeframe limits.Furthermore, if there would be an infringement resulting from non-conformance but perhaps the infringing party believes that there would be no infringement and the solution would be appropriate also if the infringing party seasonally shall notify the non-infringing party that perhaps the infringing party seems to have a reasonable amount of time to remedy the infringement.Therefore one thing becomes significant, the role including its defaulting party isn't constrained to healing by verifying requirements if it is suggested that fitting for the intent of healing is also part of the contract, therefore the party must ensure that healing suits the intention as well.