List the people involved in Carmela Coppilino’s death. Why is there a possible problem with her death certificate?
How did William Farber die? Was there a problem with his death certificate?
Why was Dr. Coppolino charged with the murders of his wife and William Farber?
Why was Dr. Coppolino not convicted of William Farber’s murder?
What did Dr. Umberger do to prove Dr. Coppolino’s guilt?
How would the “Frye Standard” be applied in this case?
What was the final ruling in Dr. Coppolino’s 2nd trial?
The case against Dr. Coppolino for his wife’s murder was tried under the Dauber Ruling? Why was it resolved the way it was? Compare it to the first.
This question is about the text "Dr. Coppolino's Deadly House Calls"
Answer and Explanation:
1. The possible people involved in Carmela's death are her husband Dr. Carl Coppolino and Dr. Karrow. That's because they probably gave a fake death certificate on Carmela's death. This is because when Dr. Karrow arrived home, Carmela was already dead and did not appear to have had a heart attack (as her husband had stated. On the contrary, it seemed that her death had been caused, but even so Dr. Karrow agreed to sign a state of death stating that Carmela had died of "coronary occlusion".
2. William Farber died of suffocation by the hands of Dr. Carl Coppolino, who used a pillow to kill Faber. he did this because Faber's wife had an affair with him and was unable to give her husband a lethal injection. The injection was given by Carl himself.
3. Because Marjorie Farber told the police how Carl murdered her husband and why he did it. The police then launched an investigation and realized that William Faber's death certificate indicated death from "coronary occlusion," a death that is rarely investigated by the police. After that, the police managed to obtain authorization to carry out the bodies of Camela and William Farber for an autopsy to be done, confirming that both did not die of "coronary occlusion," the police therefore decided to accuse Dr. Coppolinode of murdering his wife and William Farber.
4. Marjorie Farber had an affair with Dr. Carl Coppolino and decided to report it because she was sad when he decided to marry a wealthy socialite. She was portrayed in court as an embittered woman against a respected and professional doctor, which lightened her complaint. Furthermore, no chemical substances were found in William Farber's body, although there were indeed signs of strangulation. In the end Coppolino was not convicted because he was a professional doctor, while Marjorie was a betrayed and sad woman.
5. He proved that Carl Coppolino injected his wife with succinylcholine chloride. This substance is paralyzing and deadly, but its identification in the body is almost impossible, because it is degraded by two substances that happen naturally in the human organism. So Dr. Umberger created a new method to detect this substance. He managed to isolate, in Camelia's body, very high levels of succinic acid, which is a strong indication of the use of succinylcholine chloride
6. The Fryer standard would accept the process applied by the doctor as proof of Umberger's guilt. That's because Dr. Umberger was a toxicology expert and the Fryer standard states that within a trial, an expert's opinion should be accepted as evidence if he can use a scientifically recognized technique to prove the point, like Dr. Umberger did.
7. After presenting the facts discovered by Dr. Umberger, Dr. Coppolino was found guilty of the murder of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder.
8. We can consider that the case was tried within the Dauber Ruling, as it considered Dr. Umberger's methodology as a proof of Coppolino's guilt. However, the case of the murder of William Farber was also investigated by an expert, but it did not have the same result, probably for sexist reasons.
Why do you think a "reliable, scholarly
Source is always stressed in academic
writing?
Discuss (one paragraph minimum) what's involved in both a direct and cross examination of a witness. Please list and discuss at least three elements for both.
You must have a reason for each question you pose during direct examination. If you are the plaintiff's attorney, consider how the witness assists you in meeting your burden of proof. Pattern Jury Instructions should serve as a guide for practitioners. Cross-examination is typically regarded as the most challenging aspect of the varied responsibilities of the lawyer. There is no quick 47 shortcut or royal path to mastering the craft of advocacy. Personal 48 experience and imitating people who have been educated in the art are the most reliable ways to become proficient in this crucial need of a professional trial lawyer.
What are the elements of direct examination?
Keep things simple.
Wherever you are, practise speaking like a normal person. either at home or the workplace. It doesn't matter if you're outside or inside the court. A specific legal term of art should only be used when absolutely necessary. Otherwise, write as you normally would for both personal and professional topics. Legalese should be avoided in court because it "is a deadly collection of language habits that we unknowingly turn on or off." Ask a tough question of witnesses and you'll receive a tough answer, according to the saying. A long, rambling query will elicit a long, meandering response. If you ask a confusing question, you'll either get a confusing response or none at all. "Brevity can be crucial.
Make use of topic sentences or headings
"Conversation and direct examination are not the same thing. It ought to sound like one, but it doesn't. Though you do it correctly, you will lead the witness through the entire process without ever coming across as if you are dictating what the witness should say. "The headline way of direct" should be used to direct the witness. The headline technique of direct is described as follows: "[i]n advance of each new set of questions, declare the topic: the headline that informs the witness—and everyone else—what the subject is going to be." The "paragraph method" is another name for the straight headline approach.
To learn more about direct and cross examination from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/9010663
#SPJ1
Discuss (one paragraph minimum) what's involved in both a direct and cross examination of a witness. Please list and discuss at least three elements for both.
explain the importance of obtaining and calculating data when working to implement a new program or policy
two ways the CGE law protects citizens against human rights violations
true or false when speaking with a venture capitalists you should always requrie that they sign a non disclosure agreement
Answer: False
Explanation:
When speaking with a venture capitalist, it is generally not recommended to require them to sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) as it can signal distrust and make them less likely to invest. Venture capitalists see many business ideas and may already be working with similar companies, so an NDA can limit their ability to share insights and provide valuable feedback. It is generally better to focus on building a strong relationship with the venture capitalist and establishing trust through open communication and a solid business plan.
free flow products, the largest wholesaler in the area with near monopoly power, refuses to sell its products to papa gene, inc., a small retailer. under antitrust law, this is
Under antitrust law, the scenario of a large wholesaler refusing to sell its products to a small retailer like Papa Gene Inc., despite its near-monopoly power, because of free flow products is illegal.
What is Antitrust Law?
Antitrust law is a group of federal and state government regulations intended to safeguard customer welfare by prohibiting anti-competitive business behaviour. Businesses that engage in anti-competitive conduct, such as price-fixing or forming monopolies, might be subject to antitrust litigation.
What is Free Flow Product?
A company produces free flow products that can be marketed without exclusivity arrangements. Retailers can buy and sell these products from numerous sources, and suppliers can sell them to various retailers. Thus, retailers and suppliers can choose to collaborate with one another or go their separate ways. This allows for a diverse and competitive marketplace.
In the scenario above, the large wholesaler's refusal to sell its products to Papa Gene, Inc. means that the small retailer is being prevented from receiving the benefits of free flow products. The large wholesaler, which has near-monopoly power, is abusing its position and preventing smaller businesses from competing. Therefore, this act of the large wholesaler is illegal under antitrust law.
Learn more about Antitrust Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28044562
#SPJ11
What is 9 + 10 I need it like I’m falling law plz help
Answer:
9+10 is 19
Explanation:
take 9 and add 10 and you have 19.
what opportunities for involvement in your community appeal to you and why
Answer:
Environmental protection is the opportunity that appeals to me in the community. The climate change can be considered the main challenge of human beings on earth. Climate change has caused various tragedies from forest fires to catastrophic storms across the USA.
Explanation:
The you people can make a difference in the society.
Community involvement and volunteering are helping to attract and retain employees in a whole new way. In a recent survey, 55% of respondents said that a company’s support for social causes was an important factor in accepting a job offer.
There are several opportunities for involvement in a community that can impact and promote the quality of life of residents, such as promoting sustainability and environmental protection.
You can contribute to sustainability in your community through your personal habits, sharing information and creating events and lectures to raise awareness.
Some simple attitudes and changes in daily habits are already capable of promoting environmental responsibility, such as:
Separation and recycling of household waste.Water economy.Reduced consumption of red meat.Use of ecological transport.Therefore, every individual can help in the development of their community, seek information on what their community's greatest needs are and find out how you are able to help.
Learn more here:
https://brainly.com/question/1051849
In 1648, what was the role of the four fire wardens in New York?
O walk the streets at night
O inspect chimneys for flammable spark deposits
O carry wooden rattles to notify citizens volunteers of a fire starting
make sure there were buckets of water on every front stoop
Answer:
Explanation:
In 1648, what was the role of the four fire wardens in New York?
O walk the streets at night
O inspect chimneys for flammable spark deposits
O carry wooden rattles to notify citizens volunteers of a fire starting
make sure there were buckets of water on every front stoop
Answer:
B. inspect chimneys for flammable spark deposits
Explanation:
a free-market system cannot operate effectively and fairly without a reliable foundation in contract law.
It is generally acknowledged that a free-market economy depends on a strong legal system, including trustworthy contract law, to function efficiently and equitably. This is due to the fact that under a free-market
The formation, interpretation, and enforcement of agreements between people or entities are governed by a body of legislation known as contract law. As it offers a framework for parties to engage into legally enforceable agreements that generate responsibilities, it is essential for enabling trade and fostering economic progress. Contract law outlines the necessary components of a binding agreement, such as an offer, acceptance, consideration, and mutual consent. It also offers remedies for contract breaches, such as monetary compensation and specified performance. To ensure that parties can rely on their agreements and have faith in the fairness of the market, a strong and trustworthy system
Learn more about contract law,here:
https://brainly.com/question/30551292
#SPJ4
Discuss the mentally ill offender and the impact they are now making within corrections. Discuss the changes which have occurred over time regarding this type of inmate and the foreseeable changes in the future of corrections classification process. In your opinion, how should we manage mentally ill inmates
The mentally ill offender has become a significant issue within corrections systems worldwide. Mental illness can lead to criminal behavior, and many offenders with mental illness end up in prisons and jails.
What is mental illness?Mental illness, also known as mental health disorder or psychiatric disorder, is a condition that affects an individual's thinking, mood, behavior, or overall functioning.
Mental illness can have a significant impact on an individual's daily life, relationships, and ability to function in society.
As a result, the impact of mentally ill offenders on correctional facilities is a growing concern.
Learn more about mental illness here:
https://brainly.com/question/933852
#SPJ1
after a thorough review by the government accountability office it was suggested that the general mining act of 1872 be amended
The General Mining Act of 1872 is a federal law that governs the exploration and mining of minerals on public lands in the United States. However, after a thorough review by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), it was suggested that this act be amended.
The GAO found that the current mining law is outdated and does not provide sufficient protection for the environment or taxpayers. The GAO recommends that the government should consider revising the royalty system to ensure that mining companies pay a fair share of profits and that the government should have more control over mining operations on public lands. The GAO also recommends that the government should improve its oversight of mining operations to ensure that environmental standards are met and that taxpayers are not left with the costs of cleanup and restoration. In conclusion, it is crucial for the government to take action to update the General Mining Act of 1872, and ensure that the mining industry operates in a responsible and sustainable way.
To know more about profits visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29662354
#SPJ11
only the party who loses at trial can request an appeal of the case to a higher court. true or false
A high court may hear an appeal in a civil matter from either party. Thus, the given statement is false.
Most states limit the power to appeal in criminal cases to the defendant alone. (In some places, the prosecution has a very limited power to appeal to clarify certain legal issues. Prior to the start of the trial itself, these appeals frequently take place.
The plaintiff or petitioner and the defendant or respondent are the usual names for the parties at the trial level. Appellant and appellee are the names of the parties in an appeal.
Within 60 days of the date the decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal was communicated, any party who feels wronged by a decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal may initiate an appeal with the High Court.
For more information on high court kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/29546812
#SPJ4
The combination of alcohol with other drugs can produce a _________ effect and alter or increase the effect of alcohol alone.
Answer:
Bioplagical
Explanation:
Bioplagical creates negative effects
A(n) ________ is a person authorized by the state or county to do certain legal tasks like certifying contracts.
Question:
A(n) ________ is a person authorized by the state or county to do certain legal tasks like certifying contracts.
Answer:
Notary
evaluate the impact of the warren court on american life. cite specific cases that "reflected [the supreme court’s] deep concern for the individual, no matter how lowly."
The Warren Court, led by Chief Justice Earl Warren from 1953 to 1969, had a significant impact on American life through its landmark decisions that advanced civil rights, criminal justice reform, and individual liberties.
Several notable cases exemplify this commitment to protecting the rights of all individuals:
1. Brown v. Board of Education (1954): The Court's unanimous decision in this case declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, overturning the "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson. This decision was instrumental in the civil rights movement and set a precedent for challenging racial segregation in other areas of society.
2. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): In this case, the Court held that individuals accused of a crime have the right to legal counsel, even if they cannot afford one. This decision ensured that indigent defendants are provided with legal representation, reinforcing the principle of equal justice under the law.
3. Miranda v. Arizona (1966): The Court's ruling in this case established the famous "Miranda rights," requiring law enforcement to inform individuals of their right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations. This decision aimed to protect individuals from self-incrimination and safeguard their constitutional rights during police interrogations.
4. Loving v. Virginia (1967): The Court struck down laws prohibiting interracial marriage in this case, affirming that individuals have the right to marry irrespective of their race. This decision invalidated racial restrictions on marriage, promoting equality and challenging discriminatory practices.
5. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969): The Court ruled that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." This decision protected students' rights to engage in symbolic speech, such as wearing armbands in protest, affirming their First Amendment rights within the school setting.
These cases, among others, illustrate the Warren Court's profound impact on American life. By championing civil rights, expanding individual liberties, and ensuring equal treatment under the law, the Court's decisions reflected its deep concern for the rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of their social standing.
To learn more about Warren Court, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14270054
#SPJ11
A court of ________ jurisdiction has the authority to hear a case when it is first brought to court.
Answer:
Original jurisdiction
Explanation:
Original jurisdiction means that the Supreme Court is the first, and only, Court to hear a case. The Constitution limits original jurisdiction cases to those involving disputes between the states or disputes arising among ambassadors and other high-ranking ministers.
How does our desire to make money impact the process of promoting change?
The desire to make money can impact the process of promoting change by making people invest more in innovation.
How can change come ?The pursuit of profit has the potential to act as a driving force for both individuals and organizations seeking innovation and change. In this way, increased economic growth and competitive advantage may be attained through the exploration of fresh concepts and technologies that offer opportunities previously inaccessible.
For instance, companies may begin investing in renewable resources or sustainable commodities due to mounting consumer demand as well as market trends, while entrepreneurs may put forth their best efforts in devising new products or services geared towards addressing pressing environmental and social challenges.
Find out more on promoting change at https://brainly.com/question/29779909
#SPJ1
the primary legal responsibility of business is to obey the law.True/False
Answer: True
Explation:
As business is an entity itself, it must also follow laws and rules. Every business has a responsibility to operate within the boundaries set by the various commissions and agencies at every level of the government. These rules and regulations are set for maintaining balance and the greater good of the society.
There are three boxel in a table. One of a box contemns Gold and the other two are emply. * printed contams in each box. One of a mellage it mutage frue and the other two are lier. The first box. "The gold is not there here. The second box says The and is not here. The third box says 'The Goldi says in the Second box. Which box has à Gold-
Based on the description of the statements, the Gold is one that have to be in the first box due to the fact that if the Gold was in the second box, the terms or text on the second box would have to be labeled false.
What is the box about?The riddle is one that tells of a situation where there are seen to be three boxes in a table and it has one of them having gold and the other two does not.
If the Gold was in the third box, one can say that the statement on the third box would be one that also would be false.
Therefore, the Gold have to be in the first box, and this is one where the statement on the first box is seen as a lie.
Learn more about Gold from
https://brainly.com/question/18044463
#SPJ1
Jane and Axta, are partners of a beauty salon. Axta, has been expressly prohibited from entering into any contract on behalf of the
partnership. When Jane went overseas for her holiday, the salon's air-conditioner broke down and caused their salon's client to complain. In
her desire to ensure their clients' continuous comfort, Ayra made an effort to repair the air-conditioner, but was told by the repairman to
buy a new one as the damaged unit was an old model and was beyond repair. Ayca then consulted Noah, an air-conditioner supplier and he
recommended that she purchase new industrial unit that was suitable for the salon at a price of RM3,000-00.
When Jane returned from her holiday, she refused to pay Noah for the air-conditioner as she felt it was too expensive.
Advise as to whether Noah has any right against the partners.
(50 marks)
Answer:
Yes, he has rights.
Explanation: Because he didn't just walk in and offer to fix the air conditioner
He was called and asked to fix it so this being the fact Jane has to or even Axta but either way he still has to be paid.
Is a security officer justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone?
A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone.
A security officer is a professional who is trained to secure and protect individuals and property. Security personnel may be found in a variety of settings, including corporate offices, malls, hospitals, and other locations. These professionals are tasked with ensuring the safety of individuals and property under their supervision.
Provocation is a situation in which an individual engages in actions or makes statements that are intended to provoke or incite another person. This may include insults, threats, and other forms of verbal or physical aggression.
A reaction to a stimulus is referred to as a response. This may include a variety of physiological, emotional, and cognitive changes. In terms of behavior, a response is the way in which an individual responds to a particular situation. The response to verbal provocation by a security officer may differ based on the situation and the level of provocation.
A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone. This is due to the fact that the use of force is only allowed when it is reasonable and necessary to prevent harm to oneself or others. When verbal provocation occurs, a security officer should attempt to defuse the situation verbally before resorting to the use of force.
Furthermore, if a security officer uses force in response to verbal provocation, they may face legal consequences, including charges of assault or battery. As a result, it is recommended that security personnel receive training on conflict resolution and effective communication to deal with potentially difficult situations.
You can learn more about security officers at: https://brainly.com/question/28326176
#SPJ11
What is the most accurate GDP estimate?
Group of answer choices
preliminary estimate
advanced estimate
final estimate
comprehensive review estimate
Answer:
I don't know the answer
Explanation:
What did the USA Patriot Act empower law enforcement agencies to do?a. Convict U.S. citizens without trial.b. Wiretap and spy on citizens without their knowledge.c. Detain family members to secure the surrender of a suspect.d. Employ physical torture to extract evidence from suspected gang members.e. Prevent defendants from learning the charges brought against them.
HURRY PLS
identify reasons critics object to the emphasis the United States puts on individual rights
Answer:
Government And Business in Voice for Reason
Explanation:
Assume that an individual resides in Arlington County, meets the DSM criteria for a substance use disorder, and has agreed to plea guilty to their alleged crime (in addition to a 12-month suspended sentence). Given these facts, which of the following statements about that same individual participating in Arlington County's Drug Court is the MOST true?
They could participate in drug court if they also had no prior convictions for violent weapons or felony offenses.
They could participate in drug court is they also had no probation or supervision obligations outside of Arlington County.
They could participate in drug court if they also had no prior convictions for violent weapons or felony offenses and no probation or supervision obligations outside of Arlington County.
It is impossible to answer this question with the information provided.
Option 3. This individual would be able to participate in the drug court based on this option: They could participate in drug court if they also had no prior convictions for violent weapons or felony offenses and no probation or supervision obligations outside of Arlington County.
What is meant by drug court?Drug courts are specialized court docket initiatives that focus on criminal defendants and offenders, young offenders, and parents involved in ongoing child welfare proceedings who have issues with alcohol and other drugs.
Drug courts may differ in their intended audience, program structure, and service resources, but they often follow a well-rounded model that includes:
Risk, need, and responsiveness screening for offenders.judicial dialogue.Monitoring and supervision, such as drug testing.graduated penalties and rewards.services for treatment and rehabilitation.A non-adversarial, multidisciplinary team that includes judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, community prisons, social workers, and treatment service specialists typically runs drug courts. Through participation in hearings, programming, and celebrations like graduation, stakeholders representing law enforcement, the family, and the community are invited to offer their support.
Read more on drug courts here: https://brainly.com/question/14673992
#SPJ1
a person is persuaded to rent or sellk a dwelling in a specific neighborhood because mebers race, religion or national origin are moving in scheme is called
A person is persuaded to rent or sell a dwelling in a specific neighborhood because members' race, religion, or national origin are moving in the scheme is called Blockbusting.
Blockbusting was a business practice in which realtors and developers persuaded white residents in a particular area to sell their property at a price below market value. This was accomplished by intimidating homeowners by telling them that racial minorities would soon move into the neighborhood. have used this technique in
Updated 10/28/2019. Blockbusting is the practice of real estate agents persuading homeowners to sell their homes at lower prices out of concern that the neighborhood's socioeconomic demographics will change and home values will decline.
Learn more about Blockbusting https://brainly.com/question/14977132
#SPJ1
Which of the following terms does NOT describe a casualty that could be deductible for tax purposes if it occurs in a federally-declared disaster area?
Sudden
Weakened
Unusual
Unexpected
The term that does not describe a casualty that could be deductible for tax purposes if it occurs in a federally-declared disaster area is Weakened. Option B
What is a casualty?Generally, A person who has been killed, injured, or rendered unable to function as a result of some event is referred to as a casualty in civilian parlance.
The term is typically used to describe multiple deaths and injuries that have occurred as a result of violent incidents or natural disasters. It is frequently misunderstood to mean "fatalities," but injuries that do not result in death are also considered casualties.
In conclusion, Weakened is a phrase that cannot be used to describe a casualty that may be deducted for tax reasons if it takes place in an area that has been designated a disaster by the federal government. Alternative
Read more about casualty
https://brainly.com/question/17482001
#SPJ1
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4