Answers
Answer:
They are emotional stable
Answer:A
Explanation:
Trust
Related Questions
In democracies such as the U.S., the governing legislature serves as an
example of majority rule. Which of these congressional procedures reflect(s)
the principle of simple majority rule?
A. Election of the president by a majority of the Electoral College
B. Ending a filibuster by a vote of 60 senators
C. Passage of a bill by a vote of 50 percent plus one
D. Passage of a constitutional amendment by a 2/3 vote
E. Popular election of representatives
Answers
The Passage of a bill by a vote of 50 percent plus one is the congressional procedures that reflect the principle of simple majority rule.
What is the principle of simple majority rule?Basically, the simple majority refers to the vote taken by an organization where at least 51% of the members must vote yes to approve a bill before it is accepted.
So, the Majority rule means the decision rule that selects alternatives which have a majority, that is, there is more than half the votes. This is often use in influential decision-making bodies including many legislatures of democratic nations.
Hence, the Passage of a bill by a vote of 50 percent plus one is the congressional procedures that reflect the principle of simple majority rule.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about majority rule
brainly.com/question/13484265
#SPJ1
which of the following does NOT earn interest?
A. FDIC
B. CD
C. Checking Account
Answers
Answer:
A checking account.
Explanation:
☁️Answer☁️uhm I would say B. But prob A. But go with A.
☁️Explanation☁️hope this helps!!
Investigators have found a murder victim who was apparently exposed to a toxic substance. In order to find out what the substance was and how it killed the victim, they might look for the help of a
1. forensic geneticist
2. forensic sociologist
3. forensic etymologist
4. forensic chemist
Answers
Use the drop-down menus to complete the statements.
The supremacy clause gives the greatest amount of power to _____ (State law or federal law ??)
.Because of the supremacy clause, states ______ ( can contradict, may ignore or must follow ?? ) federal law.
Answers
The supremacy clause gives the greatest amount of power to federal law. Because of the supremacy clause, states must follow federal law.
What are the principles of government?The Constitution of the United States of America rest solely on seven (7) basic principles of government and these include the following:
Checks and balances.Republicanism.Federalism.Individual rights.Popular sovereignty.Limited government.Separation of powers.What is the supremacy clause?The Supremacy Clause is a clause contained in "Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution" and it establishes that all federal laws shall generally take precedence over state laws, by according the greatest amount of power to federal laws.
Read more on supremacy clause here: https://brainly.com/question/27915892
#SPJ1
Federal Law
Must Follow
You have just been appointed the Commissioner of Police for the city of New York. You know that there is a credible threat of terrorism and you must develop a policy that officers can follow to momentarily stop individuals, ask them some pertinent questions and then lightly frisk them to determine if they are concealing a weapon. You also know that the former police commissioner was strongly criticized for his stop-and-frisk policies, and the federal courts ruled they were unconstitutional because officers engaged in stop and frisk with a large number of black and Latino residents and far less white or Asian residents. Nonetheless, such a policy is an important tool in the fight against terrorism.
In no less than 200-words, describe how you would craft a new policy that allowed officers to determine if individuals were plotting terrorist acts or carrying concealed weapons.
Answers
What other drugs should be legalized, and what legal drugs should be illegal, and why?
Answers
Answer:
i dont know the right answer but whatever i know about this i am going to give you a knowledge about it
Explanation:
Whether Bill Clinton “inhaled” when trying marijuana as a college student was about the closest the last presidential campaign came to addressing the drug issue. The present one, however, could be very different. For the fourth straight year, a federally supported nationwide survey of American secondary school students by the University of Michigan has indicated increased drug use. After a decade or more in which drug use had been falling, the Republicans will assuredly blame the bad news on President Clinton and assail him for failing to carry on the Bush and Reagan administrations’ high-profile stand against drugs. How big this issue becomes is less certain, but if the worrisome trend in drug use among teens continues, public debate about how best to respond to the drug problem will clearly not end with the election. Indeed, concern is already mounting that the large wave of teenagers—the group most at risk of taking drugs—that will endss
please MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST ANSWER
"How are both physical evidence and testimonial evidence used in a court of law?"
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Testimonial evidence is a statement made under oath; also known as direct evidence or prima facie evidence. Physical evidence is any object or material that is relevant in a crime; also known as indirect evidence. Examples are hair, fiber, fingerprints, documents, blood, soil, drugs, toolmarks, impressions, glass.
In 1996 California legalized the medical use of marijuana, even though it was still illegal under federal law. Californians Angel Raich and Diane Monson used medical marijuana that they grew on their own property. When federal agents destroyed their plants, Monson and Raich sued, claiming, among other things, that the Commerce Clause did not permit the federal government to regulate activities that took place in their back yards and homes. The federal government argued that since consuming locally-grown marijuana for medical purposes affects the interstate market for marijuana, the federal government may regulate—and prohibit—such consumption. Whose argument should prevail?
Answers
Answer:
The federal government's argument must prevail.
Explanation:
The medical marijuana of Angel Raich and Diane Monson really affects the interstate marijuana market and interferes with government control of that product. In this case, the federal government has the authority to regulate and prohibit the consumption and sale of this product. In this case, the action of justice in destroying the factories of Angel and Diane was correct, and it is not up to them to open a case in their defenses.
ms.urbanski kept a pistol in her home as protection against intruders. one evening she heard a noise in the den and went to investigate. upon entering the room she saw a man stealing her television. the bugular seeing the gun ran for the window but ms. urbanski fired and killed hime before he could escape. in a trial for manslaughter ms urbanski pleaded self-defense. would you find her guilty? why or why not? would it matter if the state had a stand your ground law
Answers
In some states, individuals have the right to use deadly force in order to protect themselves or their property from imminent harm. This is known as the "castle doctrine" or "stand your ground" law. In states with these laws, it may be easier for Ms. Urbanski to claim self-defense.
However, even in states with these laws, the use of deadly force must be reasonable and proportional to the threat faced. If Ms. Urbanski's actions were found to be excessive, she could still be found guilty of manslaughter.
Ultimately, the case would be decided by a judge and/or a jury based on the evidence presented and the specific laws of the state where the incident occurred.
What issues does article 1 of the constitution deal with
Answers
1. Section 1: Legislative Powers: This section vests all legislative powers of the federal government in Congress, comprising the House of Representatives and the Senate.
2. Section 2: House of Representatives: This section defines the qualifications and responsibilities of members of the House of Representatives, including the process of election, the apportionment of representatives based on population, and the authority to initiate revenue-related bills.
3. Section 3: The Senate: This section outlines the qualifications and responsibilities of senators, including the process of election and the equal representation of states in the Senate.
4. Section 4: Elections and Meetings: This section grants the states the power to establish the times, places, and manner of congressional elections, while also requiring Congress to meet at least once a year.
5. Section 5: Rules and Procedures: This section grants each chamber of Congress the power to determine its rules, procedures, and discipline for its members.
6. Section 6: Compensation and Privileges: This section establishes the compensation and privileges of members of Congress, including protection from arrest while attending sessions and freedom of speech.
7. Section 7: Legislative Process: This section outlines the process for passing bills into law, including the requirement of bicameral approval and the presidential veto power.
8. Section 8: Powers of Congress: This section enumerates the specific powers of Congress, including the power to collect taxes, regulate commerce, coin money, establish post offices, declare war, and make laws necessary and proper for carrying out its responsibilities.
9. Section 9: Limits on Congress: This section imposes certain limitations on the powers of Congress, such as prohibiting the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the enactment of ex post facto laws.
10. Section 10: Limits on States: This section outlines the restrictions placed on the states, including their ability to enter into treaties, coin money, or engage in war without the consent of Congress.
Overall, Article 1 establishes the structure and authority of the legislative branch, defining its powers, responsibilities, and limitations within the framework of the U.S. government.
Answer:
Article I describes the design of the legislative branch of US Government -- the Congress. Important ideas include the separation of powers between branches of government (checks and balances), the election of Senators and Representatives, the process by which laws are made, and the powers that Congress has.
After hearing your brakes make a grinding noise, you decide to take your car to a mechanic. You go to a garage that is offering a great deal on brake jobs. He writes you out an estimate to replace the brake pads, and you leave the car with him. When you return at the end of the day, he submits a bill to you that is four times the estimate. He explains that you needed new rotors, but he could not reach you at the telephone number you left him to discuss the problem. What should you do?
Answers
In this case, the client is being required to pay for something that the client never said anything about fixing. Therefore, the client shouldn't be forced to pay the bill and the mechanic should either put the old rotor back into place or therefore let the client leave with the original payment.
If this continues into file, the client could place into a lawsuit against the mechanic for requiring a payment of something the client never was told or never said they would pay. In this case, the mechanic made a decision without the person's approval and the lack of communication should have been granted that the Mechanic never should have done anything and just told the person once they returned to pick the car up.
explain five relationship between separation of power and checks and balances
Answers
The relationship between the separation of powers and checks and balances is Mutual Restraint, Legislative Oversight, Judicial Review, Appointment and Confirmation, and Lawmaking Process.
The separation of powers is the division of government authority into three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial, each with distinct functions and responsibilities. Checks and balances, on the other hand, refer to the system that ensures no single branch becomes too powerful by providing mechanisms for the branches to restrain or oversee one another.
Here are five key relationships between these concepts:
Mutual Restraint: The separation of powers creates independent branches that can act as a check on the others. For example, the legislative branch can pass laws, but the executive branch can veto them. This ensures that no single branch can dominate or misuse its authority.Legislative Oversight: The separation of powers grants the legislative branch the power to oversee the executive branch through mechanisms such as hearings and investigations. This enables Congress to hold the executive branch accountable for its actions and decisions.Judicial Review: The judiciary, as part of the separation of powers, has the authority to interpret and apply laws. Through judicial review, the courts can check the actions of the legislative and executive branches to ensure they align with the Constitution and established legal principles.Appointment and Confirmation: The separation of powers requires the cooperation of different branches in the appointment and confirmation process. For instance, the executive branch nominates judges and officials, but the legislative branch confirms these appointments, acting as a check on executive power.Lawmaking Process: The separation of powers and checks and balances affect the lawmaking process. The legislative branch proposes and passes laws, while the executive branch can veto them. However, the legislative branch can override the veto with a supermajority vote. This interplay ensures that no single branch has absolute control over the legislative agenda.know more about legislative here:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ8
"Impermanence is the cause of all suffering”
Evaluate this statement.
Answers
Suppose the New Jersey state legislature institutes a law that mothers of children in elementary school, but not fathers, are entitled to seven days off each year in order to attend school events. Several fathers bring a lawsuit challenging the law on equal protection grounds. Which level of scrutiny will the court apply to the law
Answers
Intermediate scrutiny
An example of intermediate scrutiny can be found in Craig v. Boren (1976).
The Supreme Court determined that statutory or administrative sex-based classifications were subject to an intermediate standard of judicial review.
3. Which of these is NOT a good tip for passing?
A. Make sure you are on an area of road where it is legal and safe to pass.
B. Always drive at a safe speed at or below the speed limit.
C. You may reduce your following distance below four seconds when passing.
D. Make sure there is a safe gap in traffic before you change lanes.
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
it doesnt say anything about passing in that answer so it's not a good tip for passing
Effective passing techniques are explained in detail in the following paragraphs.
What is an effective passing technique?Check for risks such as oncoming traffic, vehicles approaching from behind, and merging vehicles.Look for blind spots;Make your intentions known and move into the passing lane;Accelerate swiftly to the speed;Focus on the path ahead of you;Look in your rearview mirror for the following vehicles.Option B. Always travel at or below the posted speed limit.
Learn more about the effective passing techniques here:
https://brainly.com/question/15983366
#SPJ2
Create your own society include
5 human rights
10 constitutional rights
list them down
Answers
2. rights to food and water
3. the right to shelter
4. Freedom that can not be taken away unless a crime is committed
5. right to medical treatment
Constitutional
1. Right to freedom of speech
2. Right to practice your beliefs as long as they don’t break any laws
3. Having the right to education
4. right to an attorney
5. Right to vote at the age of 16
6. right to own property
7.Right to kick people off or out of your property
8. right to defend yourself with proportional force
9. rights to public services for free (police,ems and fire department)
10. right to start a vote to change a law
How can consumers use consumer protection laws to protect themselves in the marketplace?
Answers
The Food and Drug Administration
associated with each drug.
A. suggests
B. doesn't require
C. requires
that manufacturers warn people about the risks
Answers
Answer:
the answer is C. because it is a law
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
Which term refers to the legitimate writings that a handwriting expert compares to a suspected forgery?
Answers
Answer:
I think they're called exemplars.
When is it hardest to see motorcyclists?
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head on, they take up so little of your visual field.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot.
d. All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them.
Answers
The hardest to see motorcyclists : All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them. Option D is the correct answer.
Motorcyclists can be difficult to see in various situations, and it is essential for drivers to be vigilant and actively look for them. Here's an explanation for each option:
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head-on, they take up so little of your visual field: Motorcycles have a narrower profile compared to other vehicles, making them less visible when approaching from the opposite direction. Due to their smaller size, they can be easily overlooked, especially if drivers are not actively scanning for them.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes: Motorcycles can be particularly challenging to spot on the freeway due to the high volume of traffic and frequent lane changes. The quick maneuverability of motorcycles allows them to navigate through traffic, but this also increases the risk of being overlooked by drivers who are not attentive or fail to check their blind spots before changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot: Motorcycles can easily fall into a driver's blind spot, which is an area not visible in the rear-view or side mirrors. It is crucial for drivers to check their blind spots by turning their heads and using proper mirror adjustment to ensure they are aware of any motorcyclists in their vicinity.
Option D is the correct answer.
For such more question on motorcyclists:
https://brainly.com/question/27196118
#SPJ8
As it relates to the policymaking process, what is the main idea of the cartoon below? Justify your answer with support and reasoning.
Answers
The main idea of the cartoon is that lobbyists have a significant influence on the policymaking process.
How to explain the informationThe cartoon shows a congressman speaking at a podium, saying "Nobody tells me what to do or say!" while holding a microphone labeled "Lobby." This suggests that the congressman is not making his own decisions about what to say, but is instead being influenced by the lobbyists who are paying for his microphone.
The cartoon is making a critical point about the role of lobbyists in the policymaking process. Lobbyists are paid to represent the interests of their clients, and they often have a lot of influence over the decisions that lawmakers make.
Learn more about policy on
https://brainly.com/question/3006046
#SPJ1
Where would a bill deciding the budget start?
Answers
Answer:
In the United States, the budget process begins with the President's budget proposal, which is typically submitted to Congress in early February. The proposal outlines the President's spending and revenue priorities for the upcoming fiscal year, which begins on October 1.
The budget proposal is then considered by the House and Senate Budget Committees, which are responsible for developing a budget resolution that sets overall spending levels for the federal government. The budget resolution is a non-binding document that serves as a blueprint for the appropriations process, which is the process of allocating specific amounts of money for specific programs and activities.
After the budget resolution is adopted by both the House and Senate, it is used as a guide for the appropriations committees, which are responsible for drafting and passing individual appropriations bills that fund the various agencies and programs of the federal government. The appropriations bills must be passed by both the House and Senate and signed into law by the President before the new fiscal year begins in order to avoid a government shutdown.
Explanation:
List Four Sevierville City Departments:
Answers
Parks and Recreation
Planning and Development
Water and Sewer
explain the term 'power struggles' in the context of gender abuse.
Answers
In the context of gender abuse, power struggles refer to situations in which an abuser uses their power and control over the victim to maintain dominance and control.
What is gender abuse ?Gender abuse, also known as domestic violence or intimate partner violence, is a pattern of behavior in which one partner uses physical, sexual, emotional, or financial abuse to exert power and control over the other partner.
In power struggles related to gender abuse, the abuser may use a variety of tactics to maintain control, such as intimidation, threats, isolation, coercion, or physical violence. These tactics can make it difficult for the victim to assert their own power and autonomy within the relationship, as they may be afraid of the consequences of defying the abuser.
Find out more on gender abuse at https://brainly.com/question/28182587
#SPJ1
Why do many poisonings go undetected in our modern day?
OB.
C.
D.
because poison testing is very expensive
because poison testing is unreliable
because there are no routine procedures for poison testing
because poison testing can only be carried out by forensic toxicologists with at least 15 years of experience
Answers
Poisonings go undetected in our modern day because poison testing can only be carried out by forensic toxicologists with at least 15 years of experience.
Injury or death brought on by ingesting, breathing, touching, or injecting various medications, chemicals, venoms, or gases is referred to as poisoning. Many chemicals, including medicines and carbon monoxide, become hazardous at larger dosages or concentrations. Pesticides, personal care and topical goods, and cleaning chemicals are some of the top 10 household products that cause poisoning exposures experience each year. Poisonings at work result from exposure to a range of chemicals. Over 90% of toxic exposures take place at home.
To learn more about Poisonings, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/8439604
#SPJ1
Are there any people in our society who should not be held to the same standard by the law? if so, who? if not, why not?
Answers
Answer:
no because no person is above or under the law
What are the 11 steps on how a bill becomes a law?
Answers
Answer:
Step 1: The bill is drafted
Step 2: The bill is introduced
Step 3: The bill goes to committee
Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill
Step 5: Committee markup of the bill
Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill
Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber
Step 8: The bill goes to the president
Step 9: Overriding a veto
Step 10: House and Senate agree on final bill
Step 11: President approves bill
HELP FAST PLEASE
i'll mark you brainliest
How do we investigate contemporary Supreme Court cases to understand and influence legal arguments and decisions?
Answers
Answer:
There are a few ways to investigate contemporary Supreme Court cases. One way is to read summaries of the cases from a variety of sources, including newspapers, legal journals, and online news sources. Another way is to read the full text of the Supreme Court opinion, which is available online on the court's website. Finally, it is also possible to watch or listen to audio recordings of the oral arguments in the case, which are also available on the court's website.
Opiates in low doses cause
Answers
Answer:
It could make you feel sleepy, but a higher dose may cause death since it can slow you breathing and heart rate.