Someone legally appointed to care for children if their parents die has _____.

A.
kinship

B.
custody
Answer:
a. kinship
Explanation:
100 POINTS BRAINLIEST PLS HELP ME
You’ve now got your evidence from the crime scene back in the lab, and you’re ready to analyze it. The only problem is, your lab is short-staffed and low on funds. It looks like you’ll only be able to run four tests.
Based on the evidence you collected at the crime scene, which four of these tests would you run, and on which items? Explain your choices. (At least three sentences)
DNA analysis
Fingerprint comparison
Toxicology analysis/drug testing
Glass analysis
Soil analysis
Hair analysis
Fiber analysis
Ballistic/firearm analysis
Blood spatter analysis
Impression evidence analysis
NOTE: If you need more information about a test, do some additional research online.
Use the evidence you’ve collected and/or your notes and photographs to answer the following:
What are the physical properties for each piece of evidence? For evidence that’s a representation, like a cardboard cutout, list possible physical properties that a real version of the item might have. (List at least three for each)
Do you think it would be useful to determine the chemical properties of any of the evidence? Why or why not? (At least one sentence)
Could any of the evidence have class characteristics or individual characteristics that would help the investigation? Which items? What are their possible class and individual characteristics, and how could you use those in the investigation? (At least four sentences)
Answer:
DNA analysis
Fingerprint comparison
blood spatter analysis and ballis/ firearms analysis
Explanation:
Can I have a branliest
The first major difference between public and private safety providers has to do with who they:
hire.
host.
serve.
pay.
Answer:
Serve
Explanation:
Tell me if I got it wrong pls:)
I hate civics
In the case of plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme court focused it's decision on the interpretation of the world _____.
Answer:
Equal.
Explanation:
(1896) The case involved whether the state could segregate based on race.
The court ruled that segregation based on race did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities were equal in quality.
This became known as the "separate but equal" doctrine, which was later overruled by Brown v. Board of Education.
Please don't hate civics. Give it a little attention and you will learn so much about the world around you and how many of the laws in existence today were determined.
***50 POINTS***
Explain the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution. (3 Parts)
a. What is it?
b. What does it contain?
c. How many are there?
You are eligible to get your Class E restricted license when you
are at least 16 years old and have had your Learner License for
at least. ___months.
9
2
6
12
Answer:
6 months
hey!
To apply for a provisional driver's license, a driver must be at least 16 and under 18 years old. The person must have held a learner's permit for at least six months prior to applying for a provisional driver's license.
The driver also must have at least 100 hours of driving experience supervised by a person at least 21 years of age who has had a valid driver's license for at least three years. Alternatively, the driver can complete a traffic safety education course and at least 50 hours of supervised driving experience.
hope that helps! :)
Answer:
The correct answer is 6 months.
Explanation:
MARK ME AS BRIANLIST
May the prosecution/defense accuse to a witness from the same team?
For example, if I am a lawyer from the defense, but, to declare the defendant guitless I need to blame a witness from the defense.
What should I do? Look for another witness from the other team or use the perfect witness from my own team.
Please answer with US system, it's for a mock trial
For the defense of the defendant, I will choose for another witness from the same team.
What is defense?A defense is supporting or defending someone in an argument when he has been criticized.
After choosing the another witness from the another team, as a lawyer I will make try to make him puzzled by asking the complex questions again and again. So that he will not be able to respond in a proper manner.
I will also make sure that the statement of this witness varies with the statement of another important witness of the same team. Giving contradictory statements by the witnesses of the same team makes no important conclusion in accusing my defendant.
Learn more about defense here:
https://brainly.com/question/16223801
#SPJ1
Which act could be considered an acceptance of the social contract?
-paying the electric bill in exchange for using electricity
-viewing commercials in exchange for watching network news broadcasts
-observing traffic laws in exchange for driving on the highway
-paying the water bill in exchange for taking a shower
Answer:
c. observing traffic laws in exchange for driving on the highway
Explanation:
Viewing commercials in exchange for watching network news broadcasts could be considered an acceptance of the social contract. Thus, option B is correct.
What is a social contract?A social contract is an unspoken arrangement of the obligations of the populace or the governing body. The agreement's conditions can change significantly.
One could argue that consuming news channel broadcasts in return for ads signify endorsement of the social contract. People must engage with each other in this condition of affairs, therefore citizens establish an agreement between themselves to govern this contact.
The social contract hypothesis is not only the oldest but also the most well-known of the explanations for how the state came into existence. The core of this thesis is that men without prior governmental organization agreed to a deal that led to the creation of the state.
Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about the social contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18597938
#SPJ5
What are the negative effects of human rights violations
Answer:The negative effects of human rights violation would be so drastic that it would lead to violation of various social, economic, physical and mental functioning of human beings.
Explanation: 1)would lead to initial exploitation of individuals
2)corruption and unlawful practices would increase
3) pose as threat to international peace and socio - economic status of the world
Explanation:
The effects are multidimensional and interconnected, leaving no part of the victim's life untouched. Exposure to trauma can lead to sleep disorders, sexual dysfunction, chronic irritability, physical illness and a disruption of interpersonal relations and occupational, family and social functioning.
A Driver License is the right to operate a motor vehicle. True False
Answer:
This statement is true
Explanation:
when investigating a murder crime scene that took place in a victims home what evidence should you be looking for to collect ?
Splatter patterns from blood, things that seem to be missing, evidence of a break-in, disturbed areas on the walls, open, locked, and broken doors, evidence around the body.
Explanation:
To do a complete investigation the best way is to look for things that don't seem to be where they should be or are in a place that seems either unusual or different. Anything can be evidence depending on the case.
Someone else can drive your car if _____.
A. you have proof of residency
B. they have proof of insurance
C. they have proof of residency
D. you have proof of insurance
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.
Explain the difference between the way that laws are made in Australia through parliaments and through the courts.
Answer:
The Parliament (represented by an icon of Australian Parliament House) has the power to make and change law. The Executive (represented by a group of people) has the power to put law into action. The Judiciary (represented by an icon of a scale) has the power to make judgements on law
Why is the speaker recognized as the head of the US Congress ?
Answer:
The president of the House of Representatives is the representative of the highest hierarchy within the House, designated by his peers within it to lead the debates and be its spokesperson.
It is a role customarily recognized as the head of Congress, since although it is actually chaired by the Vice President of the United States, the latter has a dual role, both executive and legislative, that makes it impossible in a certain way to lead the Congress in a complete way.
How it Works
A Losing party files a petition for a writ of certiorari with a higher court. The petition is a formal request for the higher court to review the lower court judgment against the party petitioning. The petition must include the names of all parties in the case, as well as the facts and legal questions of the case and an argument as to why the higher court ought to agree to hear the case.
If the higher court agrees to hear the case, known as granting cert, it issues a writ of certiorari to the lower court. The writ requires the lower court to provide the higher court with a physical copy of the entire record compiled during the course of the case, from the initial filing of a complaint all the way through the final judgment issued by the lower court. Once the higher court has the record, it reviews it for errors made by the court to answer the questions presented in the petition. Additionally, the higher court sets a date for the parties to present the case for review.
If the appellate court does not want to take the case, it will deny the petition. This is usually acknowledged as "cert. denied". Certiorari review is always discretionary. Further, Rule 10 of the U.S. Supreme Court's rules states that it will only grant a petition for cert. if there are "compelling reasons." The writ is usually granted only when there are important questions of law that need to be addressed; it is rarely used when the petition alleges errors in the findings of fact.
Answer: First, a state court case goes to ____________. If that case is appealed, it goes to ________________. Another way to get the Supreme Court to hear a case is _______________________.
Using the Ballotpedia overview of the writ of certiorari above, explain how a case that starts in a state court can work its way to the Supreme Court.
First, a state cοurt case gοes tο Trial cοurt. If that case is appealed, it gοes tο the intermediate appellate cοurt in the state.
Anοther way tο get the Supreme Cοurt tο hear a case is By filing a petitiοn fοr a writ οf certiοrari.
What dοes Trial Cοurt mean?A trial cοurt, alsο knοwn as a cοurt οf first instance, is a cοurt οf law where cases are initially heard and decided. It is the first level οf the cοurt system where a case is heard and facts are presented. Trial cοurts have the authοrity tο determine the facts οf a case, apply the law tο thοse facts, and make a judgment οr ruling οn the matter.
In the United States, trial cοurts are typically οrganized by jurisdictiοn and handle bοth civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, trial cοurts may hear a wide range οf disputes, including cοntract disputes, persοnal injury claims, and family law matters, such as divοrce and child custοdy. In criminal cases, trial cοurts hear cases where individuals are accused οf cοmmitting a crime and determine whether the defendant is guilty οr nοt guilty.
Learn more about trial courts
brainly.com/question/30390265
#SPJ1
Why is malice difficult to prove? i need this ASAP
Answer:
Although defined within the context of a media defendant, the rule requiring proof of actual malice applies to all defendants including individuals. The standard can make it very difficult to prevail in a defamation case, even when allegations made against a public figure are unfair or are proved to be false.
Explanation:
Summarize the arguments against the death penalty
Answer:
The death penalty is the harshest punishment that can be imposed on a criminal depending on the violation of the law he has committed: usually, the death penalty is applied to crimes of extreme gravity, such as multiple murders, for example. Even so, in most of the countries of the world, this penalty is abolished given its irreversibility.
Precisely, the main criticism of the death penalty is its irreversibility, that is, once the sentence is executed, there is no possibility of going back. Another criticism is the one that says that the death penalty avoids the deserved punishment of a criminal, such as a life in prison sentence.
Alfred is a defense attorney. He is trying to prepare a strong case for his client, Jeffrey, who has been accused of several crimes. These crimes include trespassing, robbery, battery and assault, and arson. Alfred wants to request the prosecution to take Jeffrey to trial on one crime at a time. Which pretrial motion should Alfred file?
Answer: Motion for severance of charges
Why are the majority leaders of the house and senate powerful?
Answer:
Most powerful leader in Congress. Most important job is to decide what bills will be debated by the full House and when. He or she also presides over the House, assigns bills to committees, and appoints members to special committees.
Explanation:
pls, I am so desperate I'll give brainliest!!! Jordan is especially interested in the concept of being presumed innocent until proven guilty. He is convinced that most jurors will form an initial opinion about whether or not the defendant is innocent or guilty from the first time they see the defendant. Jordan believes that initial impression can have a negative impact on the outcome of the case and plans to take that angle in the story he will be writing for the newspaper. To help Jordan determine if his theory is correct, you’ve decided to attend the trial with him and take on the role of a juror. You are determined to maintain an open mind and not form an initial impression of the defendant’s guilt or innocence.
Answer the following questions using a total of 3-5 sentences each:
How would you keep an open mind and truly presume the defendant is innocent at the start of the trial?
Describe at least three things you could do to uphold the presumption of innocence as a juror is supposed to do.
The key to keeping an open mind is to go in truly blind to the trial. That means the potential juror shouldn't have any exposure to media about the defendant or the events in question. The juror should learn everything during the court case itself when the prosecution presents the case carefully laid out, and the juror should also weigh the defenses argument as well. This is why jurors are not allowed to consume outside media, especially news articles or watch news on tv. In some cases, jurors are sequestered to isolate them further from the outside world to prevent accidental jury tampering. Unfortunately a lot of news in the modern era tends to have an editorialized spin to it. Meaning there are opinions, conjecture and speculation injected into things when they shouldn't be there. It should be facts only.
In addition to going into the case blind, the juror should also be free of any prejudices about the person's class, race, etc. These preconcieved notions tend to potentially affect the decision a juror would make, and these notions tend to be unintentional. If the juror could spot these tendencies and try to eradicate them (before they get worse), then it likely would lead to a more impartial juror.
Here are 3 things you could do to adhere to the philosophy of "innocent before proven guilty"
Keep the idea in your head that another person could be guilty.Try to put yourself in the shoes of the defendant.Everyone is human. Even if the first impression may have been a bad one, it could have just been a bad day for the defendant. The same may apply for the day in question involving the crime.At the end of the day, keep in mind the most important thing: The burden of proof lies with the prosecution and not the defense. It's up to the state to prove the defendant guilty. This is why the verdict is a simple binary choice of "guilty" vs "not guilty". It's because the jury is testing the claims made by the prosecution.
In order to receive a paralegal certificate, the exam may cover:
the American legal system, ethics, analytic skills
civil lawsuits, legal research, and legal contracts
legal organization and court administrative procedure
the American legal system, administrative law, business organization
Answer:
The correct answer is C) legal organization and court administrative procedure
Explanation:
The job of paralegals in the US essentially covers the following:
Investigation of the facts of a caseCollection of documents from a variety of sourcesResearch into similar legal casesDocumentation of reports and legal documentsDrafting pleadings and motions to be filed with the court andAll other assistance required by the attorneys during trialsCheers
5. Which type of strategies were most successful in achieving results in cities? Explain
how these strategies were implemented.
Answer:
A partnership between cops and the community members achieved a 63m percent reduction in youth homicides and the same strategy recently reduced nonfatal gun assualts by 55 percdent.At its simplest, this strategy simply identifies those who are most likely to shoot or be shot, and then confronts them with a double message of empathy and accountability.In Chicago, another program uses cognitive behavioral therapy to help teenage boys manage difficult thoughts and emotions, by teaching them how to avoid or mitigate conflicts. This program reduced violent crime arrests among participants by half. Similar strategies have reduced criminal reoffending by 25 to 50 percent.
Explanation:
the colonies were divided into regions name each of the regions and list the colonies that were part of each region. what did each regions economy consist of?
Answer:
The colonies in British North America were indeed divided into regions based on geographic proximity and shared characteristics. The three main regions were New England, the Middle Colonies, and the Southern Colonies. Here are the colonies that were part of each region, along with a brief description of their economies:
1. New England Colonies:
- Massachusetts Bay Colony (including present-day Massachusetts)
- New Hampshire
- Connecticut
- Rhode Island
The economy of the New England Colonies was primarily based on industries such as fishing, shipbuilding, trade, and manufacturing. The region had a long coastline and abundant natural resources, which supported the development of maritime activities. Additionally, the New England colonies engaged in subsistence farming, producing crops like corn, beans, and squash, although the rocky soil and short growing season limited agricultural success.
2. Middle Colonies:
- New York
- Pennsylvania
- New Jersey
- Delaware
The Middle Colonies had a diverse and varied economy. They were known as the "breadbasket" colonies due to their fertile soil, which supported extensive agriculture. The region grew crops such as wheat, barley, oats, and rye. The Middle Colonies also had a significant trading presence, with their ports serving as hubs for commerce and shipping. Manufacturing and industries such as iron production, textiles, and shipbuilding were also important economic activities in this region.
3. Southern Colonies:
- Virginia
- Maryland
- North Carolina
- South Carolina
- Georgia
The Southern Colonies' economy was predominantly based on agriculture, particularly the cultivation of cash crops. The region had a favorable climate and fertile land, which allowed for the large-scale production of crops like tobacco, rice, and indigo. Plantations, worked by enslaved labor, were central to the Southern economy. The Southern Colonies also engaged in some trade, primarily exporting their agricultural products.
It's important to note that these descriptions provide a general overview of each region's economy, and there were variations and nuances within each colony.
The colonies were divided into three main regions: New England, Middle Colonies, and Southern Colonies.
The list of the colonies that were part of each region:
1. New England Colonies:
2. Middle Colonies:
New YorkPennsylvaniaNew JerseyDelaware3. Southern Colonies:
MarylandVirginiaNorth CarolinaSouth CarolinaGeorgia
The economies of each region varied due to differences in climate, geography, and available resources.
1. New England Colonies:
Economy: The New England colonies had a diverse economy but were primarily centered around trade, fishing, shipbuilding, and maritime activities. They also engaged in subsistence farming and later developed manufacturing industries such as textiles.
2. Middle Colonies:
Economy: The Middle Colonies had a mixed economy, with a focus on agriculture, trade, and commerce. They were known as the "breadbasket" colonies due to their fertile land, which allowed for the cultivation of staple crops like wheat, corn, and oats. They also had thriving industries such as ironworks, lumbering, and manufacturing.
3. Southern Colonies:
Economy: The Southern Colonies had an agrarian economy heavily reliant on cash crops and plantation agriculture. They cultivated crops like tobacco, rice, indigo, and later cotton, using slave labor on large plantations. The export of these cash crops formed the backbone of their economy. They also had some trade and commerce, but agriculture dominated the Southern economy.
Know more about Colonies here:
https://brainly.com/question/32013798
#SPJ8
Who was Clarence Gideon and what was his connection to the Sixth Amendment?
O He was the judge in a major case to prove the right against being charged with the same crime twice.
O He was a victim of a robbery in Florida and he defended himself and won his case.
He was a poor man who could not afford a lawyer, appealed his case, and was later acquitted.
O He was a Florida prosecutor in a landmark case for tenants' rights.
Answer:
O he was a Florida Prosectutor in a landmark case for tenants rights
Explanation:
If men were agnles, no government would be necessary.. in framing a govenment witch is to be administered by men, over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place, oblige it to control itself
If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” From the series Great Ideas of Western Man.
Artist
Arthur Williams
Date
1950
no answer
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
People look to government for which of the following reasons? A. to pay taxes and protect their way of life to protect their way of life and control all their decisions C to maintain order and control all their decisions to protect their way of life and maintain order Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
A, they should protect our liberties. And provide opportunities for personal happiness, security, and safety.
4. Mr. Gee had been accused of a crime and placed in jail. During his trial by jury, he was found not to
be guilty of a crime. Several months later, new evidence was found. Mr. Gee was placed in jail again for
the same crime as before and later brought to trial a second time.
What is this amendment
Answer:
Amendment 6 - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Explanation:
A police officer responds to a call about a young person with a gun sitting on a park bench. Upon arriving at the park in his cruiser, the officer tells him three times to “show your hands.” The young person did not show his hands and may have reached toward his belt. Within two seconds of arriving, he was shot and killed by the police officer. The young person turns out to be 12 years old and the gun turns out to be a toy. Is this a justifiable use of force by the officer? Explain your answer.
Answer: I would suggest looking at the Tamir Rice and Tyre King cases. Most of the 911 calls describe them as men with guns, and don't indicate an age. Now police officers don't have the luxury of knowing whether or not a gun is fake, and that's why it's a dangerous job. In both cases, the 911 operator failed to mention that these "guns" these young boys were carrying might be fake, and that they are most likely juveniles, so their was a miscommunication there that could've saved someone's lives. In regards to the Tamir Rice's case, the fatal shot that killed Rice was shot within seconds of the officers arriving on the scene. Why wouldn't an officers first instinct not be to neutralize a suspect non-lethally? These are hard questions and answers. Now parents fear that if there child is seen playing with a toy gun outside then they may be shot and killed. I guess by law they replica guns are indistinguishable and if an officer fears for their lives it's justified. Personally, I think it isn't it's very clear looking at Tamir Rice he is a child!!! I think deadly force should be a last result, and for them to pull a gun on him without evaluating the scene makes me think it had more to do with racial stereotyping more than anything.
Looking at a lineup of suspects to an armed robbery, Zoe is struggling to identify the man that she saw running from the scene. The suspects all look so alike to her, and she did not get a close look. Zoe concentrates on the faces of the suspects, noting that one suspect has very cold looking eyes. She decides that he must be the one who committed the crime. What kind of reasoning is Zoe using to identify the suspect?
biological
chemical
hormonal
weather
Gall’s theory suggested that the shape and characteristics of a person’s skull offered insight into that person’s personality. Which term BEST describes this study of the skull?
phrenology.
psychopathy.
somatotyping.
anthropology.
Eli committed a gruesome crime, and during the trial, tells the jurors that he only did it because voices inside his head told him to. He insists that the voices are real and that he must always follow their directions, or they will hurt him. Psychologists have tried to explain to Eli that the voices are not real but that he is hallucinating them. Eli’s motive for committing the crime is called:
self defense.
duress.
psychosis.
psychology.
Answer:
here are my answers
Explanation:
1. Hormonal
2. Phrenology
3. Psychosis
There are different types of the case study are:
Hormonal kind of reasoning is Zoe using to identify the suspect. Thus, option (c) is correct.Phrenology term best describes this study of the skull. Thus, option (a) is correct.Eli’s motive for committing the crime is called Psychosis. Thus, option (c) is correct.What is Phrenology?
The term phrenology refers to the common human behavior-based hypothesis that states an individual's character and mental faculties correspond with the form of their head.
The first case study is based on a hormonal based because hormonal help the development of the body and growth it is the direct connection to the brain.
The second case study is based on phrenology because the shape of the brain is best described in phrenology.
The third case study is based on psychosis because it's a type of mental disorder. A person believed in the inner voice and then commits the crime.
As a result, the three cases are totally based on the mind such as hormonal, phrenology, and psychosis. Therefore, options 1. (c), 2. (a), and 3. (c) are correct.
Learn more about phrenology, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12319883
#SPJ2