Under the proposed city ordinance, police officers would have discretion when dealing with individuals possessing less than four ounces of marijuana. They could either (a) arrest the offender, leading to possible jail time or (b) write the offender a ticket, treating the infraction like a traffic violation.
Whether this policy is just and fair depends on various factors, such as the potential for unequal treatment, the prioritization of law enforcement resources, and the impacts on the community. On one hand, allowing officer discretion could lead to inconsistencies and potential biases in how offenders are treated. On the other hand, treating minor marijuana possession as a traffic violation could reduce the burden on the criminal justice system and allow officers to focus on more serious crimes.
As for the impact on police officers protecting the community, this policy could make it easier for them to allocate resources more effectively and concentrate on higher-priority issues. However, if discretion is not applied consistently and fairly, it could create mistrust and tensions within the community. Ultimately, the success of this policy would depend on how effectively it is implemented and monitored.
To know more about the Illegality of Marijuana Possession- https://brainly.com/question/29800924
#SPJ11
brad and mariah are partners in doctors for children, a medical clinic. brad’s dissociation from the firm results in
Brad's dissociation from the firm results in the automatic termination of the firm's legal existence.
Other partnership's buyout of Brad's interest in the firm the immediate maturity of all partnership debts the temporary suspension of the partnership's business.
A partnership is a kind of business where a formal agreement between two or more people is made who agree to be the co-owners, distribute responsibilities for running an organization and share the income or losses that the business generates.
Hence, Brad's dissociation will automatic terminate the firm's legal existence.
Learn more about dissociation here:
https://brainly.com/question/32674500
#SPJ1
Question 4 of 10
In what way have laws about sexual orientation impacted HR management?
A. It means HR managers must work to close the wage-gap
throughout an organization.
B. It means HR managers must create policies that prevent
discrimination.
c. It means HR managers must provide work visas to all employees.
D. It means HR managers must prepare for an increasingly aging
workforce.
SUBMIT
It means HR managers must work to close the wage-gap throughout an organization in the way have laws about sexual orientation impacted HR management. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is management?The term “management” refers to the act of managing. The management of the business activities. Management is the basis of art, science, and the profession. Management are they manage the organization. Management are based of the different functions are the step by step.
According to the HR management, is the department of the organization. The HR management was the main work to the hiring and the firing. There were the laws on the sexual orientation impacted HR managers must work to close the wage-gap throughout an organization.
As a result, the HR managers must work to close the wage-gap throughout an organization in the way have laws about sexual orientation impacted HR management. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on HR management, here;
https://brainly.com/question/25806768
#SPJ5
As a consultant for the YMCA in Edmond, Oklahoma, you have been hired to complete a site selection report. The Y is currently looking at 3 different locations and they have asked you to prioritize them. Discuss, in detail, the steps (discussed in your textbook) that you would take to complete this report. Use relevant examples form the Edmond area.
To complete the site selection report for the YMCA in Edmond, Oklahoma, I would follow several steps outlined in the textbook. These steps include conducting a feasibility study, analyzing the site characteristics, assessing community needs, and evaluating potential risks and benefits.
Feasibility Study: I would begin by conducting a feasibility study for each location under consideration. This study would involve analyzing factors such as demographics, market demand, competition, and economic indicators. For example, I would examine the population growth rate in the Edmond area, income levels, and trends in health and fitness participation.
Site Characteristics: Next, I would analyze the specific characteristics of each location. This would include evaluating factors such as size, accessibility, visibility, zoning regulations, infrastructure, and proximity to amenities. For instance, I would assess the available parking space, the ease of transportation access, and the visibility of each location from major roads.
Community Needs: It is crucial to assess the community's needs to ensure the YMCA can effectively serve the target population. This would involve conducting surveys, interviews, or focus groups with residents to gather information on their preferences and expectations. Additionally, I would research existing community facilities and programs to identify any gaps or opportunities for the YMCA to address.
Risk and Benefit Analysis: To evaluate potential risks and benefits, I would consider factors like operational costs, revenue potential, environmental impact, and potential partnerships. For example, I would assess the cost of acquiring or leasing each location, ongoing maintenance expenses, and the revenue-generating potential through membership fees or program offerings. Additionally, I would evaluate the potential for collaborations with schools, healthcare providers, or local businesses.
By following these steps, the site selection report would provide a comprehensive analysis of each location's suitability for the YMCA in Edmond. It would prioritize the locations based on their alignment with the community's needs, financial viability, and overall potential for success.
For more questions on feasibility study
https://brainly.com/question/30985089
#SPJ8
Discuss three challenges that local indigenous community
Local indigenous communities face various challenges, including cultural preservation, land rights and environmental issues, and social and economic disparities.
One significant challenge faced by local indigenous communities is the preservation of their cultural heritage. Indigenous cultures often face the risk of being marginalized or assimilated into mainstream societies, leading to the loss of traditional practices, languages, and knowledge. Efforts to preserve and revitalize indigenous languages, traditions, and customs are crucial to maintaining their cultural identity and passing it on to future generations.
Another challenge relates to land rights and environmental issues. Indigenous communities often have deep connections to their ancestral lands, which hold cultural, spiritual, and economic significance. However, encroachment by external forces such as mining, deforestation, and large-scale development projects can threaten their land rights and disrupt ecosystems. Indigenous communities often face challenges in asserting their rights, advocating for sustainable land management practices, and protecting their territories.
Furthermore, social and economic disparities present significant challenges for indigenous communities. Historically marginalized and discriminated against, indigenous populations often experience lower access to education, healthcare, employment opportunities, and basic services. This contributes to social and economic inequalities, perpetuating cycles of poverty and limited social mobility. Efforts to address these disparities involve initiatives to improve education, healthcare, infrastructure, and economic opportunities specifically tailored to meet the needs of indigenous communities.
Learn more about economic disparities here:
https://brainly.com/question/31789472
#SPJ11
ပရဟိတဆိုတာဘာလဲ ရည်ရွယ်ချက်ဖော်ပြပါ
Answer:
what do you want ?
Explanation:
Critically discuss the structure and composition of south africas parliament
Answer:
ewan q sayo
Explanation:
wag mona sagutin
What AR covers the policies and responsibilities of command, which include the Well-being of the force, military discipline, and conduct, the Army EO Program, and the Army Sexual Assault Victim Program?
AR 600-20 covers the policies and responsibilities of command, which address various aspects essential for maintaining a professional and effective Army. These aspects include the Well-being of the force, military discipline and conduct, the Army Equal Opportunity (EO) Program, and the Army Sexual Assault Victim Program.
The Well-being of the force ensures that soldiers have access to the necessary resources and support for their physical, emotional, and mental health. This holistic approach contributes to a more resilient and combat-ready force.
Military discipline and conduct are crucial for maintaining order and efficiency within the Army. AR 600-20 outlines standards for behavior, addressing issues such as insubordination and misconduct, while fostering a culture of professionalism and respect.
The Army EO Program aims to promote equal opportunity and eliminate discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender, or national origin. This program helps create an inclusive environment where everyone is treated fairly and has the opportunity to excel.
Lastly, the Army Sexual Assault Victim Program provides support to victims of sexual assault, ensuring their safety and well-being. This program emphasizes prevention, education, and appropriate response to sexual assault incidents, fostering a safe and respectful Army community.
In summary, AR 600-20 establishes guidelines and policies for command responsibilities, focusing on the well-being of soldiers, military discipline, equal opportunity, and support for sexual assault victims to maintain a professional and effective Army.
You can learn more about Military discipline at: brainly.com/question/30208301
#SPJ11
OJ SIMPSON
BACKGROUND INFO
Use the internet to find the answers to the questions below:
1. WHAT CAREER DID OJ SIMPSON HAVE?
2. WHAT WAS HIS NICKNAME?
3. WHY WAS HE GIVEN THIS NICKNAME?
4. WHO WAS OJ'S WIFE?
5. WHAT HAPPENED TO HIS WIFE IN 1994?
6. WHAT WAS OJ ACCUSED OF INVOLVING HIS WIFE?
7. WHAT WAS THE VERDICT IN HIS TRIAL?
8. WHAT HAPPENED TO OJ IN 2007?
9. HOW MUCH TIME DID OJ SERVE FOR HIS CRIME COMMITTED IN 2007?
10. WHERE IS OJ NOW?.
O.J. Simpson played American football and was renowned for his quickness and cunning. He participated in two Rose Bowl games as a college player, was named All-American (1967–68), and won the Heisman Award (1968).
How did O.J. Simpson come by his moniker?What is true about sports? Simpson was selected first overall by the American Football League (AFL) Buffalo Bills in the 1969 draft. He was frequently referred to as "Juice" because of his brisk running style and the fact that his initials might be interpreted as "orange juice." The AFL and the National Football League amalgamated the next year (NFL).
O.J. Simpson stabbed his wife a certain number of times.On June 13, just after midnight, authorities discovered Brown and Goldman's remains. The space between Brown's front steps and the front gate was crowded with their bodies. Goldman endured 20 stabbings total, compared to Brown's 12, the last of which nearly severed her neck.
To Know more about National Football
https://brainly.com/question/30056620
#SPJ9
Which term is used to describe the official judgement stating the guilt or liability of the defendant concerning the issue in question?
Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the decision of either a jury or a judge, that a person accused is not guilty of the crime for which he has been tried
I hope this is what your kind of looking for!
sorry if it isn't!
Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial; the accused is also referred to as the defendant. A person is declared innocent of the offence for which they have been convicted in court upon being found not guilty by a jury or a judge.
What is judgment?A court's official decision establishing the relative rights and claims of the parties to a lawsuit. The court's constitutional right to hear a case and make a decision.
Moral judgements about what is right or wrong in character traits, such as virtues or vices. Moral judgments about what is right or wrong in action. Moral judgments about what is good or evil in people.
A judgment is the ultimate determination of a court or tribunal. Following the judges' review of all relevant evidence from the legal trial as well as of all rights and obligations, the plaintiff and defendant will get the final verdict.
Thus, Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial.
For more information about judgment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2890222
#SPJ6
Chapter 3 discussion A*
Officer P, a university police officer, received information that a student living in a campus dormitory was selling drugs. This information was conveyed
to Officer P by an anonymous caller to the officer's cell phone. Officer P knew the suspect in question and had similar suspicions. Officer P
immediately went to the dormitory and stopped the student as he was leaving the building. Officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found
drugs.
Were these actions valid? Justify your answer.
anak and valid external courcer ARA in text citations and references are required. For full credit, you
Yes, Officer P's actions were valid. As officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found drugs.
What is validity?
Whether or whether the effects seen in a study are the result of manipulating the independent variable and not some other factor is referred to as internal validity.
In other words, the independent and dependent variables are causally related. Controlling irrelevant variables, employing uniform instructions, counterbalancing, removing demand features, and investigator effects can all help to increase internal validity.
The term "external validity" describes how broadly the findings of a study may be applied to different contexts, individuals, and historical periods.
By employing random selection to choose volunteers and conducting studies in a more natural environment, external validity can be increased. Simply put, face validity refers to whether the test seems to measure what it purports to. The simplest measure of validity is this one.
Learn more about validity, here
https://brainly.com/question/13012369
#SPJ1
Your ex starts dating your best friend and you key their car. Now you violated a what?
Answer: the law
Explanation:
how is legal precedent used between courts of different states? courts of a state cannot challenge the precedence of courts of another state. courts of a state can use precedent from courts of another state as a form of guidance. courts of a state cannot cite the judicial decisions of courts of another state in its decisions. courts of a state must follow precedent from courts of another state for similar cases.
Legal precedent is the foundation of the common law system and it plays an important role in the judicial process. courts of a state can use precedent from courts of another state as a form of guidance is correct answer.
First and foremost, courts of a state cannot challenge the precedence of courts of another state. This means that if a court in one state has established a legal precedent in a particular case, courts in other states must generally follow that precedent when confronted with similar cases.
However, courts of a state can use precedent from courts of another state as a form of guidance. This means that while they are not bound to follow the legal precedents established by other states, they may consider them when making their own decisions.
In summary, while courts of a state must follow precedent from courts of another state for similar cases, they are not bound by those precedents. They can use them as guidance but must ultimately rely on their own legal precedents when making decisions.
To know more about Judicial process refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/30167423
#SPJ11
Which of the following is not a procedural defense but can be used to prove one’s innocence?
Entrapment
Double jeopardy
Alibi
Prosecutorial misconduct
Answer:
I am leaning towards "Alibi". This suggests that the defendant was somewhere else when the alleged crime occurred.
Explanation:
Entrapment is the coercion of Police Departments to try and frame someone of a crime.
Double Jeopardy relates to the U.S. Constitution and prohibits someone from being convicted more than once of the same crime.
Prosecutorial misconduct is a way in which the prosecutor interferes with due process. Some examples are -- getting the news to sway the public (creating bias). Perjury (not telling the truth), and finally, tampering with the evidence.
Therefore, I think it is the "Alibi". C.
Best,
Secondary sources of law
Answer:
background resources.
im am verrrrryyyy lost can some one help me
Answer:
I wish I could, but it make no sense!
Explanation:
individuals high on machiavellianism are significantly more likely to have unethical intentions and to engage in unethical behavior including accepting kickbacks
The given statement is true.
High Machiavellianism individuals may be more willing and adept liars who are less likely to be honest in their replies during interviews. In contrast to psychopaths or narcissists, people with high levels of Machiavellianism are more likely to intend to use deceit in interviews and to consider such usage as ethical. Men and women with high levels of Machiavellianism may approach interviewers in various ways. Women with high levels of Machiavellianism tended to give interviewers more latitude to control the interview's content, according to a study that looked at how much candidates let interviewers steer the issues discussed during the interview. Men with high levels of Machiavellianism provided interviewers the least degree of latitude in determining the interview's topic. During job interviews, men with high levels of Machiavellianism were also more inclined to fabricate details about their backgrounds or experiences. An interviewer or human resources representative with a high degree of Machiavellianism is more likely to mislead, manipulate, or otherwise alter the course of an interview or recruiting process.
To learn more about narcissists please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/18309761
#SPJ4
Who has to confirm (approve) of presidential appointments to the Cabinet and Supreme Court?
Answer:
From its earliest years, the Senate has jealously guarded its power to review and approve or reject presidential appointees to executive and judicial branch posts. In its history, the Senate has confirmed 126 Supreme Court nominations and well over 500 Cabinet nominations.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you! :)
3. A promotional.permit allows you to:
A. Drive around and offer samples of alcoholic beverages from your car
B. Offer a discounted price on alcoholic beverages
C. Promote the sale of certain alcoholic beverages by offering in-store samples, demonstrations, and
promotions
D. None of the above
Select the correct answer.
According to routine activity theory, which is a possible reason for internet fraud?
O A. increasingly motivated offenders
OB. easily available suitable targets
O C. lack of capable guardians
OD. people with no internet access
Answer:
Im not sure if this is right but i thnk its (B) Available Suitable Targets
Explanation:
what means if you are gagah
Answer:
gagah means manly but whats the question?
Explanation:
Using the democracy standard, in your own words, explain how federalism constrains democracy in five ways.
Using the democracy standard, federalism can constrain democracy in five ways as democratic power , influence the policy-making process, restricts the powers of elected officials , unequal distribution , national decisions .
1. Federalism creates distinct levels of government that limit the scope of the citizens’ democratic power.
2. Federalism divides the government’s powers, making it difficult for citizens to influence the policy-making process.
3. Federalism restricts the powers of elected officials, resulting in a limited amount of citizens’ input.
4. Federalism can cause unequal distribution of resources and influence among the states, resulting in less power for citizens in some states.
5. Federalism can prevent citizens from having the same voice in national decisions that they do in state and local decisions.
For more similar questions on federalism:
brainly.com/question/12835949
#SPJ11
What is the name of the agreement or plan of government which contains rules to help the colonists live together peacefully
Answer:
The colonists had no intention of declaring their independence from England when they signed the Mayflower Compact.
Explanation:
I
11.)
In New York State a person may not be charged with a felony unless charged by ?
Answer:
Explanation:
A misdemeanor because its a less serious crime than a felony. Felonies are the most serious crimes you can commit and have long jail or prison sentences, fines, or permanent loss of freedoms. Misdemeanors usually involve jail time, smaller fines, and temporary punishments..
Your "Field of Vision" is:
A.
How well you can read 3/8-inch letters from an area (field) of 20
Everything you can see with your central and peripheral vision
C. O None of these choices are correct
B.
D.
What you can see directly ahead of you
Answer:
Everything you can see with your central and peripheral vision
Explanation:
During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?
Answer:
During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?
Explanation:
There is no penalty for wrong answers on grid-in questions, so you should grid in anything that ... Sometimes sentence completion questions contain two blanks rather than one. In ... If you have already taken an SAT, use your actual scores from that test. • If you ... audience will be in no ---- about the meaning of the speech.
the vast majority of holdings in a law library are reporters (publications of past legal decisions). how are these old cases important or useful?
Reporters, which are publications of past legal decisions, are important and useful for several reasons:
Legal PrecedentLegal ResearchHistorical ContextCritical AnalysisLegal EducationReports, which are publications of previous legal decisions, are significant and useful for a number of reasons:
Legal precedent: Establishing legal precedent is one of the most essential functions of reporters. The notion of legal precedent states that a court decision should be followed by other courts in comparable instances.
Reporters are an important resource for legal research. Reporters are used by lawyers and legal researchers to locate cases that are relevant to their present legal difficulties.Historical Context: Reporters give historical context for the growth of legal concepts and the law.Legal academics can discover faults or contradictions in legal reasoning by analyzing historical instances, which can lead to reforms in the law.Reporters have a crucial role in legal education.For such more question on legal research:
brainly.com/question/30692962
#SPJ
Explain the effects of the case Furman vs Georgia had on the death penalty. Is it still in effect today?
The court found that the death penalty was being applied arbitrarily and discriminatorily, resulting in an excessive number of death sentences.
The Furman decision effectively halted all executions in the United States, and many states responded by re-evaluating their death penalty statutes. In 1976, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty in Gregg v. Georgia, which allowed states to reinstate the death penalty under revised statutes that addressed the concerns raised in Furman. As a result, many states revised their death penalty laws to make the application of the penalty more consistent and less arbitrary.
Today, the death penalty is still in effect in 27 states, but there is ongoing debate and litigation over its constitutionality and fairness. The effects of the Furman decision can still be seen in the continued efforts to ensure that the death penalty is applied fairly and consistently.
Read more about constitutionality here:https://brainly.com/question/14918421
#SPJ11
When talking to his investment clients, broker Adam often refers to tax shelters. This term typically means?
Explanation:
The term "tax shelter" typically refers to a legal method of reducing taxable income and, therefore, the amount of tax owed. Tax shelters can take many different forms, including investment opportunities such as individual retirement accounts (IRAs), 401(k) plans, and annuities, as well as certain types of business expenses or deductions.
congress' ability to pass laws needed to carry out its expressed powers is known as the __________ clause.
Congress' ability to pass laws needed to carry out its expressed powers is known as the "necessary and proper" clause.
The necessary and proper clause is found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the authority to make all laws that are necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers specifically enumerated to it.
The exact wording of the clause states that Congress has the power "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
The purpose of the necessary and proper clause is to provide Congress with the flexibility and authority to pass legislation beyond its expressly listed powers, as long as it is necessary and proper for the functioning and execution of those powers.
It serves as a constitutional basis for implied powers, allowing Congress to legislate on matters that may not be explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but are closely related to its enumerated powers.
The necessary and proper clause has been interpreted broadly by the courts, expanding Congress' authority to pass laws that enable the effective exercise of its express powers.
For such more question on laws:
https://brainly.com/question/30037866
#SPJ8
What has been one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech? A) fewwe cases involving minors, B) fewer laws limiting minority rights. ,C) a more accurate election, D) a more informed society
Answer:
D) a more informed society is considered one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech. The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, which has helped promote the exchange of ideas and opinions, and has allowed individuals to express their views and challenge the status quo without fear of retribution. This has led to a more diverse and informed society, where a wide range of viewpoints and opinions are expressed and debated, contributing to a more robust democracy.