Basically the bill of rights is a written set of guaranteed freedoms to citizens
Explanation:
if you get consent from a child to care for them, you do not need consent from any adult responsible for the child.
true
false
The statement is False
While obtaining consent from a child is important for certain decisions, it does not negate the need for consent from the adults responsible for the child.
In most jurisdictions, legal authority and decision-making power concerning the well-being and care of a child lie with the parents or legal guardians.
Consent from the child alone may not be sufficient or legally valid in situations where the child's welfare or rights are concerned.
Parental or guardian consent is typically required and considered paramount in decisions involving medical treatment, education, travel, or other significant matters.
It is important to respect the rights and responsibilities of the adults responsible for the child while also considering the child's views and best interests, depending on their age and maturity level.
For more such questions on statement, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30553622
#SPJ11
1. As manager of a foreign subsidiary, I have recently discovered my chief of operations has authorized a very convoluted accounting system, most likely to hide many costs that go into his pocket. Right now, I have no real proof, but rumors are circulating to that effect as well. This chief, however, has close ties to officials in the government who can make or break my company in this country. What do can I do?
identify the first step act as well as two key aspects that make this reentry approach successful
The First Step Act has long been supported by people from all political parties. In fact, an identical bipartisan bill was on the verge of becoming law in 2015, but election-year politics prevented it from happening.
WHAT DEEMED TO BE THE FIRST STEP?There has to be a drastic overhaul of the American federal prison system. Lack of efficient rehabilitative programming, which has been made worse by overcrowding and arbitrary sentencing, has led to a revolving door in jails that affects local communities as well as our nation.
In the roughly one year since it was passed, the First Step Act has had an effect. According to testimony given last Thursday by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) officials, 3,100 inmates have been released early under the "good conduct time" clause, which entitles inmates to an early release provided they exhibit good behavior while detained. In addition, since the Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) was made retroactive by the First Step Act, a little over 2,100 individuals had had their sentences reduced as of last week. Due to a First Step compassionate release provision, around 100 more people have gotten sentence reductions. The FSA considerably reduced the sentencing inequities between crack cocaine and powder cocaine.
Learn more about federal prison from here;
https://brainly.com/question/25831697
#SPJ1
What was the consequence of the georgia general assembly’s expulsion of its african american members during reconstruction?
A decrease in the agricultural production in the state of Georgia was a consequence of the Georgia general assembly's expulsion of its African American members during reconstruction.
The period of reconstruction is highly remembered and revered in history as the most significant events that took place in changing the political and social structure of the American society. Under this event, the African American members faced an expulsion from the Georgia General Assembly. As a result of the same, the labor force of slaves reduced, thereby leading to a reduction in the agricultural produce.
Learn more about the reconstruction here:
https://brainly.com/question/16792041
#SPJ4
A state law requiring certain contracts to be in writing and signed before they will be enforceable at law is known as the...
A state law requiring certain contracts to be in writing and signed before they can be enforceable at law is commonly referred to as the "Statute of Frauds."
The Statute of Fraud is a legal doctrine that originated in English common law and has been adopted in various forms by many jurisdictions, including states within the United States. The purpose of the Statute of Frauds is to prevent fraud and ensure that important agreements are properly documented and evidenced by written records.
It typically applies to specific types of contracts, such as contracts for the sale of real estate, contracts that cannot be performed within one year, contracts for the sale of goods over a certain value, and contracts to answer for the debts or obligations of another person. Under the Statute of Frauds, these contracts are considered unenforceable if they are not in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought.
The writing requirement is meant to provide reliable evidence of the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties involved. It's important to note that the specific requirements and provisions of the Statute of Frauds may vary from one jurisdiction to another.
know more about Statute of Frauds here:
https://brainly.com/question/29732680
#SPJ11
Alcohol abuse is intentional overuse.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Life insurance guarantees your loved ones get a certain
amount of money when you
Get injured
O Move out of the house
O Pass away
Turn 18
If someone owns a piece of land, do they own it all the way to the center of the earth?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
they bought it
what to do if the mother left y'all baby with you and she has a family protection order on you In the person bring the baby you saying they done with him
Answer:
Well kinda depend on the situation. I don't know much about this but i believe you can take it to court, if she doesn't give a good explanation that family protection order can get overruled.
I hoped this helps
how does opportunity cost influence people in their decisions about exercise and diet?
Answer:
Hope this helps (O) _ (O)
Explanation:
Economics This lesson identifies the key princi- ples that guide economic analysis. It introduces students to the basic economic problems of scarce resources, unlimited wants, the need to choose among alternatives, the consequences of cost, and the importance of incen- tives. While noting that nothing of value is free, the les- son explains how voluntary trade helps to provide more goods and services. While today is important, people are forward-looking in the decisions they make.
Reasoning Economic reasoning proceeds from basic assumptions about human activity. This lesson introduces students to these basic assumptions and uses them to model economic reasoning about an issue. It shows students how to apply the assumptions in the case of what seems to be a mystery: Why would people who admire a trim, slender appearance in others choose to eat too much and be inactive?
what does it mean to waive your rights to a speedy trial
To waive your rights to a speedy trial means to agree to the proceedings moving slower than state law provides.
The right to a prompt trial is protected by the Sixth Amendment as well as numerous state laws. Many defendants wish to exercise this right, especially those who are detained and waiting in jail. However, attorneys frequently suggest that their clients "waive time"—that is, agree to the processes going more slowly than what state law allows.
A speedy trial is guaranteed to the defendant in all criminal matters by the United States Constitution. The accused must either be brought to trial or discharged within a reasonable amount of time, according to the rapid trial promise. Legally, the government is not allowed to imprison someone without a trial for an extended period of time.
To know more about a speedy trial, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/2771951
#SPJ4
An agent has listed the property of a korean immigrant. she advertises the property in general circulation media only and not in a korean publication. the agent is guilty of
This agent most likely engaged in Blockbusting.
What exactly does "blockbusting" in real estate mean?Blockbusting is the practice of placing African American residents in historically all-white communities in an effort to precipitate a quick exodus of white people and a decrease in house prices. This method has long been employed by real estate speculators to take advantage of market instability brought on by prejudice.
What is a blockbuster?The most frequent instances of blockbusting encompass: When real estate brokers inform neighborhood residents that their community is "changing" and that they need to take their property; Making house-to-house calls to neighborhood residents to urge them to sell before their property prices decline; and.
To know more about Blockbusting visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17063288
#SPJ4
Why is DNA profiling not more commonly used in criminal investigations?
Answer:
DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. ... In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's DNA can be compared to evidence from the crime scene. The results of this comparison may help establish whether the suspect committed the crime.
Explanation:
In the United States, real incomes have increased about 2 percent per year. At this growth rate, average income doubles every
Regardless matter whether the original income is $500 or $25,000, if a country's income increases at a rate of 2 percent annually, it will double in 35 years.
What is real income?The income of people or nations that has been adjusted for inflation is referred to as real income. It is determined by dividing nominal income by the current level of prices. When discussing an individual's income, real income is also referred to as real salary. Real income is the amount of money that an individual or entity makes after taking inflation into account. You will make the same amount of money if you earn $50,000 this year as you did last year. The purchasing power you previously had will be impacted if inflation changes. The cost of things increases by 2% if inflation does as well.To learn more about real income, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30560616
In which of the following situations is it legal to pass? A. The vehicle you want to pass is driving at or above the speed limit in front of you. B. You must cross a center line that's solid on your side and broken on the opposite side. C. You are in the middle of crossing a bridge that only has one lane each direction. D. You are on a straight road and can pass the car ahead under the speed limit.
Answer:
The correct answer would be (.D
Explanation:
Answer:
D. You are on a straight road and can pass the car ahead under the speed limit.
Explanation:
Have a paid subscription and want to cancel but when i request a password reset i get nothing in spam or regular email. Need this canceled asap. or will file charge dispute with my bank.
Answer: Call their customer service line if they have a number posted
Explanation:
in adventures infinity war Is Gamora Trapped in the Soul Stone?
Answer:
yes cuz it took a sacrifice to get the soul stone
Explanation:
How has the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment changed police policies that now mandates in domestic violence cases in Illinois?
Answer:
Based on the results of the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment, which concluded that arrest was the most effective in most domestic violence cases, the Minneapolis Police Department started requiring police officials to use it as the main approach and to make a report on the reasons not to do it if they fail to do it.
Explanation:
The police policies were changed in March of 1984 and led to a record of people in jail on spouse assault charges.
Based on the details of the scenario, determine what will most likely occur. lincoln has been taking advantage of benson through an unfair contract for several years. eventually, benson seeks relief and legal freedom from his contract.
Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years. eventually, Benson seeks relief and legal freedom from his contract. In this scenario, it is most likely that the contract is voided.
An unfair contract demonstrates a contract in which the rights of one of the participating contracting parties are adversely disrupted. If a contract is unfair or unjust to one contracting party in a way that denotes abuses during its formation, the court may find it to declare the contract as unconscionable and deny enforcing it. Thus, unfair contracts are declared to be void. A void contract means a contract that is entirely illegitimate and unenforceable.
Under the United States overview, "unconscionability" denotes that a term in the contract was shockingly unfair. As a result of this, the contract cannot be allowed to stand as is. However, if a court does find a contract unfair, it has got options other than just voiding it entirely. The fair parts of the contract can be enforced, and the unfair parts can be rewritten.
Learn more about void contracts at:
brainly.com/question/24766316
#SPJ4
To which of the following would Kant and Nozick agree?
Answer:
Although Robert Nozick did not consider himself to be primarily a political philosopher, he is best known for his contributions to it. Undoubtedly, Nozick’s work in epistemology and metaphysics (especially with respect to free will and the “closest continuer” theory of personal identity) has had a significant impact on those fields. However, it was the publication of his first book, Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974) that revitalized the political right-wing and set off a firestorm of critical replies and commentaries. While Nozick’s accomplishments reach far beyond the confines of political philosophy, it is safe to say that most recognize him for his work on attempting to provide a justification for the state, setting the limits of government, and trying to convince us that accepting his minimal state could foster a framework for a constellation of communities constituting a sort of utopia.
Anarchy, State and Utopia can also be seen as a critical response to John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, which was published just three years earlier and was considered to be the most robust and sophisticated defense of liberal egalitarianism. Although many credit Rawls for single-handedly rekindling interest in political philosophy, this is likely overstated praise. There is little doubt that Nozick’s systematic criticism of Rawls’ theory of justice and establishment of a rival political theory in Anarchy, State and Utopia also played a major role in bring significant attention back to political philosophy.
Thời kì nào chưa có nhà nước
here continues to be much discussion surrounding special interests and their ability to influence policy, especially when the result does not serve a larger public interest. How big a concern is this? Are there examples you can think of where such interest group activity may be a benefit to policy development?
Answer & Explanation:
The influence of special interests on policy development is a significant concern, as it can lead to policies that primarily serve the interests of a few influential groups rather than the larger public interest. The concern arises when special interest groups use their resources to shape public policy in their favor, often at the expense of other groups or society as a whole.
One example of special interest activity that may be a benefit to policy development is when interest groups represent underrepresented or marginalized groups and advocate for their needs and rights. For instance, advocacy groups that focus on environmental protection, civil rights, and labor rights often lobby policymakers to advance policies that promote the welfare of their constituents. Such groups can provide policymakers with useful insights into issues that affect these groups and shape public opinion and policy in their favor.
However, the problem arises when special interests use their influence to promote policies that only serve their narrow interests, even if such policies are not in the best interest of the larger public. This can lead to a situation where policies are created to benefit only the few, at the expense of the larger public interest.
In conclusion, while special interest group activity can be beneficial in promoting the interests of underrepresented groups, it is crucial to ensure that such groups do not unduly influence policymaking in their favor, to the detriment of the larger public interest. Policymakers must be vigilant and ensure that policies are developed through a fair and transparent process that prioritizes the broader public interest.
Powers that are not explicitly listed in the constitution, but are necessary for congress to properly carry out those powers are called_____.
Powers that are not explicitly listed in the constitution, but are necessary for congress to properly carry out those powers, are called implied powers.
An implied power can be referred to or considered as the power that can be assumed to be at the access of an authority, here Congress, and are generally not expressed within the scope of the Constitution.
Congress has been granted with certain implied powers, which are not explicitly mentioned under the Constitution. However, these powers are effective only when the authorities directly exercise them.
Learn more about implied powers here:
https://brainly.com/question/27728796
#SPJ4
You are the health information manager at General Hospital. Your in-house counsel has been contacted by an attorney for a former patient of the hospital whose inpatient hospitalization resulted in some harm to the patient. That harm was documented in an incident report prepared by hospital staff. Internal legal review of the incident report indicates that the harm described by the patient’s attorney is consistent with the harm described in the incident report. Based on the conversations between General Hospital counsel and the patient’s attorney, the counsel believes a lawsuit is imminent.
There are three parts of the discussion to be addressed in your initial response.
First, discuss which source(s) of law might govern this scenario and give an example of one source of law that would be applicable.
Secondly, discuss which part of the legal process of a lawsuit you would be involved with as the health information manager.
Lastly, what content can and/or cannot be released to the patient’s attorney and what legislation may govern this process and content release?
It should be noted that as the health information manager, one will be involved in the incident report which was to identify harm on the patient.
The legal uses of the health record are that they form the backbone of the professional liability action and can establish whether the standard of care was met. Also, they are required for civil actions.
Lastly, the incident reports that were filed is highly confidential and cannot be released to the patient’s attorney or be used against the nurse practitioner in a lawsuit
Learn more about health manager on:
https://brainly.com/question/10643509
Conservation agents object to legal hunting
Answer:
hunting is not legal but we need to make sure that most animals don't
go extinct but when the growth goes up we need to size down them
Explanation:
Test strips are most often used for _____.
Answer: to test the drug content in the blood
Explanation:Option C
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
party bravo did not perform the obligations required in the contract; the work was not on time, and did not meet the specific requirements set forth in the contract. this is considered a(n) contract.
Based on the information, this is considered a breach of contract as it does not fulfil the conditions of the contract.
What is a Contract?A contract is defined as an agreement that is legally binding and based on the assent of both parties to the transaction satisfying all the requirements of a valid contract.
When one party to an agreement fails to fulfill their end of the bargain, there has been a breach of the contract. This is referred to as a violation of contract terms.
In the given case, it is explained that Party Bravo failed to fulfill its contractual responsibilities; the work was late and did not adhere to the detailed specifications outlined in the agreement signifies elements of breach of contract.
Learn more about Contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ1
greg ousley is sorry for killing his parents. is that enough? ... not just the idea that he is sorry but the totality of circumstances, should he be released? (make sure you support your answer)
Explain the importance of studying and understanding our criminal justice system
Answer:
Criminal justice is important because it's a system that includes law enforcement, courts, prisons, counseling services, and a number of other organizations and agencies that people come into contact with on a daily basis