the chicago school of criminology can be generalized to other cities.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

as you go on 1st offence 2nd offence 3rd offence and so forth it gets worse depending on how bad your first offence will be 6 months to a year

Answer:

Because intellectual property theft is a non-violent crime, usually corporate and for financial reasons.

Explanation:

Law enforcement is aimed at solving violent crimes, of large proportions that promote physical damage and well expressed. Theft of intellectual property does not fit this type of crime, since it is a non-violent crime, of a corporate nature and that causes financial damage, but does not promote physical and widespread harm. In this case, this type of crime is best addressed by the private security and technology mission.

Answer:

what are you asking?

Explanation:

Answer:

The weights crushed him.

Explanation:

I think because he was in a room full of weigths or maybe it was a murder. These are just guesses based on the text since there is not much of a question.

Firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.

Firearms and their projectiles can provide a wealth of information to investigators and forensic experts in criminal investigations, as well as to engineers and researchers studying the performance and characteristics of firearms.

From a firearm, one can determine its make, model, and caliber. The firearm's serial number can also be used to trace its ownership and history. The condition of the firearm can provide information about its maintenance and use.

From the projectile, one can determine the caliber, type of bullet, and the angle of impact. The projectile's trajectory can be used to determine the location of the shooter and the direction of the shot.

Forensic experts can also analyze the gunshot residue left on the firearm and the shooter's hands to determine if the person fired the weapon. The presence of fingerprints or DNA on the firearm can also be used to identify the shooter.

Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.

learn more about Firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/30244650

#SPJ1

The timeline for receiving payment after obtaining an EDD certification can vary, as it depends on a number of factors, including the payment method you have selected and the processing time of your claim by the Employment Development Department (EDD).

Unemployment insurance benefits, disability insurance, and paid family leave are just a few of the employment-related services offered by the Employment Development Department (EDD), a state agency in California. For those who qualify, the EDD is in charge of administering these programs and services.

Benefits from Unemployment Insurance: The EDD helps out financially when a worker loses their job due to no fault of their own. A weekly benefit amount is available to employees who meet the eligibility conditions to support them as they look for new work.

Short-term disability insurance is offered by the EDD to qualified employees who are unable to work because of an illness or injury that is not related to their line of employment. To assist workers who are unable to work because to a, this program offers partial wage replacement.

Paid Family Leave: The EDD oversees the California Paid Family Leave program, which offers workers who require time off to care for a chronically ill family member or to bond with a new infant a portion of their lost wages.

To know more about Employment Development Department (EDD) visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20397924

#SPJ4

The balance of power theory applies to Indo-Pak relations by emphasizing the need to prevent one side from becoming too dominant.

The application of the balance of power theory in the context of Indo-Pak relations is essential. According to the theory maintaining a stable state necessitates the equitable distribution of power among opposing forces or states. Both India and Pakistan have experienced numerous wars and tense situations over the years.

According to the theory of the balance of power, instability and hostility can result from letting one side become overly dominant. Therefore, efforts are made to promote equality of opportunity and deter conflict as well as to prevent a power imbalance.

This is demonstrated by the involvement of the international community in mediating conflicts between the two countries and in promoting communication and diplomacy. To maintain stability, peace and deterrence in Indo-Pak relations, the balanced power structure principle is upheld.

To know more about power theory here

brainly.com/question/30019719

#SPJ4

Options are:

A.  establish, as a matter of principle, that QuikBilt acted wrongfully.

B.   Pure with funds for a foreseeable loss beyond the contract.

C.   Pure with funds for its loss of the bargain.

D.   Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts

Answer:

D.   Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts

Explanation:

Punitive Damages, often used in a law of tort, when the jury considered the acts of the tortfeasor or defendant to be either intentional, malicious, fraudulent, or violent in nature, and it is designed to do the following:

1. punish a defendant or tortfeasor and

2. discourage further such acts by the defendant or tortfeasor and others.

Therefore, in this case, if QuikBilt fails to meet the agreed standard, which is construed as a breach of contract and a breach of a duty of care, Pure might be awarded punitive damages to punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts. Because such acts is deemed malicious, fraudulent and intentional.

Intrastate commerce, which refers to economic activities that occur within the boundaries of a single state, can indeed be regulated by the federal government if it has an impact on interstate commerce.

This authority stems from the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. The Supreme Court has recognized that intrastate activities can have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. This principle, known as the "substantial effects doctrine," allows the federal government to regulate intrastate activities if they have a substantial economic impact on interstate commerce or if they are part of a broader regulatory scheme addressing interstate commerce.

The rationale behind this approach is to ensure the uniformity of economic regulations and prevent states from enacting protectionist measures that could hinder the free flow of goods and services across state lines. By having the power to regulate intrastate commerce with interstate implications, the federal government can address potential disparities, promote fair competition, and maintain a cohesive national economic framework.

It is worth noting that the scope and extent of federal regulation in intrastate commerce have been subject to judicial interpretation and limitations to preserve the balance between federal and state powers. However, the ability of the federal government to regulate intrastate activities connected to interstate commerce remains an essential aspect of maintaining a unified national economy.

Know more about Interstate commerce here:

https://brainly.com/question/4656005

#SPJ8

The most prevalent type of corruption in law enforcement today is police corruption.

Corruption is a dishonest or fraudulent act that is done by an individual or organization. It can be described as a misuse of power for personal gain, bribery, or embezzlement of funds. When it comes to law enforcement, corruption is even more dangerous because these officials have the authority to make arrests, and their actions can have a significant impact on people's lives. Corruption in law enforcement includes police officers, correctional officers, and other public officials who abuse their power for personal gain. They can be involved in bribery, extortion, embezzlement, and other criminal activities. Police corruption is the most prevalent type of corruption in law enforcement today.

Police corruption is the abuse of authority by a police officer for personal gain or profit. It can take many forms, such as bribery, embezzlement, extortion, and abuse of power. Police officers who are corrupt can use their power to intimidate or blackmail others, make false arrests, or cover up crimes. Police corruption undermines the rule of law, erodes public trust in law enforcement, and contributes to the breakdown of social order.

There are many reasons why police officers become corrupt. Some of the factors that contribute to police corruption include:

Poor supervision: Lack of proper supervision can lead to police officers being more prone to corruption. Poor training: Insufficient or inadequate training can lead to police officers making mistakes and being more vulnerable to corrupt practices.

Low pay: Low pay can lead to police officers being more likely to engage in corruption because they feel they need to supplement their income. Lack of oversight: Lack of oversight can lead to police officers feeling that they can engage in corrupt activities without being held accountable.

Finally, police corruption is a serious problem that undermines the rule of law and erodes public trust in law enforcement. It is important to identify the causes of corruption and work to prevent it.

You can learn more about police corruption at: https://brainly.com/question/31563359

#SPJ11

Criminal law and civil law are both part of the legal system in the United States. Criminal law and civil law differ in the following ways: Criminal law deals with cases where people have committed crimes or violated public laws, while civil law deals with cases where one party believes that the other party has caused harm or injury.

In criminal law, the state takes legal action against the offender, while in civil law, the aggrieved party takes legal action against the wrongdoer. Criminal law is designed to prevent and punish people who break the law, while civil law deals with disputes and focuses on compensation. Criminal law has many different levels of punishment, including probation, imprisonment, fines, and even death, depending on the severity of the crime. On the other hand, civil law has only one level of punishment, which is compensation. Criminal law has been set up to collect compensation since the Norman invasion, while only civil law can sentence lawbreakers to prison.

Civil law deals with private rights and remedies, while criminal law deals with offenses that threaten the safety and security of society as a whole.

To know more about Criminal law  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28484602

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Sixth Amendment was part of the Bill of Rights that was added to the Constitution on December 15, 1791. This amendment provides a number of rights people have when they have been accused of a crime

Explanation:

Answer:

The Bill of Rights became law on December 15, 1791. The 6th Amendment focuses completely on the rights of a person accused of committing a crime by the government. ... They were very familiar with a long list of government abuses from English history in which people were accused of things and punished unfairly.

Answer:

Domestic Violence Act and Criminal Law Act

Explanation: the Domestic Violence Act No 116 of 1998 and Criminal Law Act No 32 of 2007. Both are framed to protect women against any form of violence in South Africa

A highly uncommon natural element is polonium. Although it can be found in uranium ores, its extraction is not profitable. It is created by subjecting bismuth-209 to neutron bombardment, which yields bismuth-210, which subsequently decays to make polonium. Russia manufactures all of the polonium used for commercial purposes worldwide.

The chemical element polonium has the atomic number 84 and the symbol Po. Polonium, a chalcogen and extremely radioactive metal with no stable isotopes, is chemically related to selenium.

Only when Po-210 enters the body through inhaling, ingesting, or puncturing a wound does it pose a radiation risk. Internal organ exposure from this "internal contamination" may result in severe medical symptoms or even death at high doses.

Learn more about polonium here:

https://brainly.com/question/5048860

#SPJ1

You must have a reason for each question you pose during direct examination. If you are the plaintiff's attorney, consider how the witness assists you in meeting your burden of proof. Pattern Jury Instructions should serve as a guide for practitioners. Cross-examination is typically regarded as the most challenging aspect of the varied responsibilities of the lawyer. There is no quick 47 shortcut or royal path to mastering the craft of advocacy. Personal 48 experience and imitating people who have been educated in the art are the most reliable ways to become proficient in this crucial need of a professional trial lawyer.

What are the elements of direct examination?

Keep things simple.

Wherever you are, practise speaking like a normal person. either at home or the workplace. It doesn't matter if you're outside or inside the court. A specific legal term of art should only be used when absolutely necessary. Otherwise, write as you normally would for both personal and professional topics. Legalese should be avoided in court because it "is a deadly collection of language habits that we unknowingly turn on or off." Ask a tough question of witnesses and you'll receive a tough answer, according to the saying. A long, rambling query will elicit a long, meandering response. If you ask a confusing question, you'll either get a confusing response or none at all. "Brevity can be crucial.

Make use of topic sentences or headings

"Conversation and direct examination are not the same thing. It ought to sound like one, but it doesn't. Though you do it correctly, you will lead the witness through the entire process without ever coming across as if you are dictating what the witness should say. "The headline way of direct" should be used to direct the witness. The headline technique of direct is described as follows: "[i]n advance of each new set of questions, declare the topic: the headline that informs the witness—and everyone else—what the subject is going to be." The "paragraph method" is another name for the straight headline approach.

To learn more about direct and cross examination from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/9010663

#SPJ1

Discuss (one paragraph minimum) what's involved in both a direct and cross examination of a witness. Please list and discuss at least three elements for both.

Answer:

it is possibly National Government

Explanation:

1) In order to perfect its security interest in the collateral, the creditor would need to file a financing statement for the 4-Runner and the six iMacs. The financing statement would need to include the name and address of the debtor (Barton), the type and amount of debt, and the collateral being covered by the financing statement.

2) If KDM Electronics filed a financing statement that listed only Brighton Homes as the debtor's name, it would not properly perfect its security interest in the office computers. This is because the financing statement would only cover the personal property that Barton purchased using the same name (Brighton Homes), and would not cover the office computers.

3) A PMSI in consumer goods is a security interest in consumer goods that is perfected by filing a financing statement with the appropriate state agency. The purchases that would qualify as a PMSI in consumer goods would be the iMacs that Barton purchased from KDM Electronics.

4) Under Article 9, a secured party has the right to take possession of the collateral if the debtor defaults on the loan or other obligation. In this case, KDM Electronics would have the right to take possession of the surround-sound system if Barton defaults on the loan for that purchase.

However, KDM Electronics would not have the right to keep the system if it decides to do so on its own. This is because the rights of a secured party under Article 9 are limited to the specific collateral that is covered by the financing statement, and do not extend to any other assets. Therefore, KDM Electronics would need to sell the surround-sound system in order to recover its investment.

Learn more about   financing statement

https://brainly.com/question/30393980

#SPJ11

Full Question: Paul Barton owned a small property-management company, doing business as Brighton Homes. In October, Barton went on a spending spree. First, he bought a Bose surround-sound system for his home from KDM Electronics. The next day, he purchased a Wilderness Systems kayak from Outdoor Outfitters, and the day after that he bought a new Toyota 4-Runner financed through Bridgeport Auto. Two weeks later, Barton purchased six new iMac computers for his office, also from KDM Electronics. Barton bought all of these items under installment sales contracts. Six months later, Barton’s property-management business was failing. He could not make the payments due on any of these purchases and thus defaulted on the loans. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.

For which of Barton’s purchases (the surround-sound system, the kayak, the 4-Runner, and the six iMacs) would the creditor need to file a financing statement to perfect its security interest?

Suppose that Barton’s contract for the office computers mentioned only the name Brighton Homes. What would be the consequences if KDM Electronics filed a financing statement that listed only Brighton Homes as the debtor’s name?

Which of these purchases would qualify as a PMSI in consumer goods?

Suppose that after KDM Electronics repossesses the surround-sound system, it decides to keep the system rather than sell it. Can KDM do this under Article 9? Why or why no

Answer:

Explanation:

As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.

While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.

However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.

In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.

Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:

1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.

2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.

3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.

On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:

1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.

2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.

3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.

Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Individual characteristics can be identified as Individual characteristics can be identified as

having originated with a particular person or having originated with a particular person or

source

hope this helps

Answer:

Never give up on the grind

With the help of payroll deductions and occasionally at a discount, you can buy company shares through an ESPP.

The amount of shares that can be purchased under a Section 423 plan is limited by the IRS to $25,000 (calculated using the grant date fair market value) for each calendar year that the offering period is in operation. Your annual pre-discounted contribution to an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) is limited by the IRS to a total of $25,000 per calendar year.

Employees may purchase their company's stock through after-tax payroll deductions under an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP), which often offers discounts of up to 15%.

To know more about ESPP visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/23386388

#SPJ1

Answer:

1) According to the cartoon, the negative consequences of increasing the minimum wage are that it can lead to inflation and cause businesses to cut costs by laying off workers or reducing the quality of their products.

2) Branco's political ideology is conservative, and his ideology opposes government intervention in the economy. This means that he believes that businesses should be free to operate without excessive regulation, including minimum wage laws. In the cartoon, Branco is using his artistic talents to promote his conservative views by criticizing the idea of raising the minimum wage and suggesting that it will lead to negative consequences for workers and businesses.

Discretionary decision making occurs in the criminal courts because the criminal justice system is complex and there are often multiple options for how to proceed in a case.

Prosecutors, in particular, have a great deal of discretion in deciding how to handle a case. This allows them to take into account factors such as the severity of the crime, the strength of the evidence, and the resources available.

Making discretionary decisions means making decisions based on logic and judgment rather than pre-determined criteria.

It is common for the source of authority to provide criteria in relation to the decision when the authority for making a decision comes from legislation or an internal procedure.

The words "shall" or "must" usually imply that the decision maker must make a specific decision if certain criteria are met, whereas the words "may" or "should" give the decision maker more leeway in weighing various factors.

Read more about discretionary decision making

brainly.com/question/29509213

#SPJ1

The least costly ADR process is usually negotiation (option D).

ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) is a term used to describe various methods of resolving disputes outside of traditional court litigation. These methods can be less expensive, less time-consuming, and less adversarial than going to court.

Negotiation is one form of ADR, which involves the parties in a dispute coming together to discuss and reach a mutually agreeable solution.

Negotiation can occur informally, with the parties discussing the matter directly, or it can occur with the assistance of a third party, such as a mediator.

In terms of cost, negotiation is often the least expensive form of ADR. This is because it typically does not involve hiring a third-party neutral or other professionals to assist in the process. Instead, the parties themselves can come to the table to negotiate and resolve the dispute.

Negotiation can be a cost-effective method for resolving disputes in a variety of situations. For example, it can be used to settle employment disputes, business disputes, and even family disputes. It can also be used in conjunction with other ADR methods, such as mediation or arbitration.

However, it is important to note that while negotiation may be the least costly form of ADR, it may not always be the most effective method for resolving a dispute.

In some cases, parties may be unable to reach an agreement through negotiation alone, and may need to turn to other forms of ADR or even litigation.

Overall, while negotiation may be the least costly ADR process, it is important to consider all available options and choose the method that is most appropriate for the particular dispute at hand.

To learn more about negotiation, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/28461798

#SPJ11

Answer:

gives them the right to advance the due date of the part that they didn't pay for with (interest most likely)

Answer:

The case of Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Prince 2018 JDR 1588 (CC) was a landmark judgment by the South African Constitutional Court, which had far-reaching implications for the country's drug laws and the constitutional rights at play.

The case concerned the constitutionality of sections 4(b) and 5(b) of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act, which criminalized the possession, use, and cultivation of cannabis (also known as dagga) in all forms, including for personal use. The respondents in the case argued that these provisions violated their constitutional rights to privacy, dignity, and freedom of religion.

The Constitutional Court ultimately held that sections 4(b) and 5(b) of the Act were unconstitutional and invalid to the extent that they criminalized the use, possession, and cultivation of cannabis for personal use in a private place. The Court found that the prohibition on the private use of cannabis violated the right to privacy, which includes the right to possess and consume drugs in the privacy of one's home.

The Court also found that the prohibition on the use of cannabis for religious purposes violated the right to freedom of religion, as the use of cannabis was an integral part of certain religious practices. However, the Court limited the scope of this finding to the specific case before it and did not provide a blanket exemption for the use of cannabis for religious purposes.

Overall, the judgment in Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Prince represents a significant shift in South Africa's drug laws and underscores the importance of protecting individual rights and freedoms. The case highlights the need for a nuanced approach to drug policy that takes into account the complex interplay between public health, individual rights, and social justice.

Explanation:

Answer: A. To communicate when payment can't be met.

Explanation: The creditor has the right to collect payment on amounts that are due. If the debtor defaults on the debt then the creditor has several options: Attempt to collect the debt from the debtor. Attempt to collect collateral from the debtor or guarantor.

Cloture is a parliamentary procedure used in legislative bodies to end a debate and bring a decision to a vote. The purpose of cloture is to limit the amount of time a debate can go on, in order to make decisions more efficiently.

Example: In the United States Senate, a cloture vote requires the support of three-fifths of the senators present and voting. If the vote is successful, debate on the legislation is limited to 30 additional hours.

Facts:

For more about Cloture:

https://brainly.com/question/29616684

#SPJ11