The constitution establishes three branches of government with different functions. This system illustrates which principle of government?.

The Speedy Trial Act of 74' states that a trial shall not be delayed more than 100 days, the Sixth Amendment states that you have the right to a speedy trial, they are basically the same thing the 74' Speedy Trial Act just puts a number to the Amendment.

The Criminal Justice system does a terrible job at providing speedy trials, some suspects spend years waiting for their trial, and get partial or biased jury members. The Criminal Justice system in general needs reformed but especially when it comes to speedy trials.

Answer:

Theft

Explanation:

In order to provide food and shelter for those who had fled the civil war, Congress passed "An Act to Establish a Bureau for the Relief of Freedmen and Refugees" on March 3, 1865.

The Freedmen's Bureau was to construct schools, oversee agreements between freedmen and employers, and administer confiscated or abandoned estates "during the current war of revolt, and for one year afterwards." In the conflict between President Andrew Johnson and the radical Republicans in Congress over Reconstruction and the role of the federal government in integrating four million newly emancipated African Americans into the political life of the country.

The fight to establish the Freedmen's Bureau and then to extend the legislation a year later played a significant role. After the civil war, its effects on fostering racial harmony and understanding were ineffective.

To know more about Civil War visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13580061

#SPJ4

Maryland is located in the Fourth Circuit of the federal court system.

The Fourth Circuit is one of the 11 geographically delineated circuits within the United States and covers the states of Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. It has its headquarters in Richmond, Virginia, and hears appeals from federal district courts within its jurisdiction.

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals consists of 15 active judges who are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. In addition to hearing appeals from district court rulings within its jurisdiction, the Fourth Circuit also hears appeals from federal administrative agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency or the National Labor Relations Board.

Overall, the federal court system plays an important role in interpreting and enforcing federal laws, resolving disputes between parties, and upholding the Constitution of the United States.

learn more about federal court here

https://brainly.com/question/31037815

#SPJ11

Answer:

stay home jhit

Explanation:

Answer: True

Explanation:

This law, enacted in 1945, aims to exclude irresponsible drivers from driving and to protect insured drivers from the uninsured ones. To do so, the law states that those who fail to satisfy a claim for damages caused by a motor vehicle crash must have their driving license suspended for one year. The main goal of the law is to avoid having people suffering injuries in crashes caused by uninsured motorists, and it ends up encouraging motorists to purchase liability insurance.

The Texas Real Estate Commission (TREC) has several remedies available to it upon finding that a Texas license holder has violated the Canons of Professional Ethics and Conduct.

These remedies are designed to protect consumers and ensure that real estate professionals maintain high standards of professionalism and ethical conduct.

Some of the remedies available to TREC include issuing a warning, assessing fines, revoking or suspending a license, requiring additional education or training, and placing restrictions on a license holder's activities. Additionally, TREC may pursue legal action against a license holder who has violated the canons of ethics and conduct, seeking injunctive relief or other civil remedies.

However, one remedy that is NOT available to TREC is criminal prosecution. TREC does not have the authority to initiate criminal proceedings against a license holder for violating the canons of ethics and conduct. Violations of the canons are considered civil matters, and TREC's remedies are limited to disciplinary actions such as fines, license suspensions or revocations, and mandatory education or training courses.

It is important to note that TREC takes violations of the canons of ethics and conduct very seriously and will take appropriate action when necessary to protect consumers and promote ethical behavior within the industry. License holders should be familiar with the canons of ethics and conduct and take steps to ensure that they are in compliance at all times.

learn more about TREC here

https://brainly.com/question/4721435

#SPJ11

The correct answer is B: unconstitutional because it conflicts with the provisions of the federal statute.

Congress enacted a statute that prohibits the use of mechanical power hammers on all construction projects in the United States due to the danger they pose. Therefore, the amendment to the city's building safety code that requires the use of mechanical power hammers conflicts with the federal statute and is unconstitutional. Even if a private research firm concluded that nails driven by mechanical power hammers have longer-lasting joining power than hand-driven nails, the safety of individuals involved in the construction project should be given more weight. It is important to follow federal laws and regulations to ensure the safety of workers and individuals in the vicinity of construction sites.

To know more about federal laws visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14867447

#SPJ11

According to the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution, there are three items that are considered the supreme law of the land.

The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land and that state laws and constitutions must comply with these federal laws.

The first item that is considered the supreme law of the land is the Constitution itself. The Constitution is the foundational document of the United States, and it sets out the basic structure and principles of the federal government. The second item that is considered the supreme law of the land is federal law.

These laws are enacted by Congress and signed into law by the President. They cover a wide range of topics, from criminal law to environmental law to healthcare. Federal laws apply to everyone in the United States, regardless of which state they live in. The third item that is considered the supreme law of the land is treaties. Treaties are agreements between the United States and other nations. They cover a variety of topics, from trade to defense to human rights. Treaties are negotiated by the President and must be approved by two-thirds of the Senate.

To know more about Supremacy Clause

https://brainly.com/question/1481445

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

The kind of case that the jury has decided would be:

A). Civil

The courts deal with a number of cases which include:

As per the details provided, the given case would be characterized as a Civil Case as it is concerned with the conflicts that exist between Mrs. Garcia and Mr. Wakefield.

The decision of the court would aim to resolve this and hence, it exemplifies a civil case.

Thus, option A is the correct answer.

Learn more about "Jury" here:

brainly.com/question/20407684

The National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) was passed in 1984 and addressed various factors. One of its major functions was to address the nation's scarcity of organs for transplantation. It was enacted to improve the nation's organ transplantation system and to address the problem of organ shortages.

This Act also established the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), which is responsible for coordinating organ transplantation and overseeing the distribution of organs to those in need.

NOTA also addressed several other important factors related to organ transplantation. It prohibited the sale of organs and established penalties for individuals engaged in illegal organ trafficking. This provision was intended to protect the integrity and ethical considerations of organ transplantation.

Overall, the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) played a crucial role in addressing the scarcity of organs for transplantation in the United States by establishing the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and implementing regulations to ensure fair and ethical practices in organ allocation and transplantation.

You can learn more about NOTA at: https://brainly.com/question/24128652

#SPJ11

The statement is True, according to the results of the study conducted by Barlow et al., all neutralization techniques have the same impact on the likelihood of rule violation.

A violation refers to an act or behavior that goes against established rules, laws, or norms. It is an instance where someone fails to adhere to the expected standards or conditions set by a particular system or authority. Violations can occur in various domains, such as legal, ethical, social, or organizational contexts.

In legal terms, a violation often refers to the breach of a specific law or regulation. It can range from minor infractions like traffic violations to more serious offenses such as theft or assault. Violations of ethical standards involve actions that contravene moral principles or codes of conduct, such as dishonesty or plagiarism. Social violations can include actions that disrupt social norms or conventions, like inappropriate behavior in public or rudeness towards others.

To know more about Violation refer to-

brainly.com/question/31558707

#SPJ4

Answer: I would give a longer sentence to the individual who is older and has a history of juvenile delinquency.

Explanation:   Because the younger individual without a record of wrongdoing ought to be given the opportunity to do better with an excessive penalty for a single infringement hanging over his head.  He is a good candidate for rehabilitation.  The older individual with the history of delinquency is clearly not learning from his mistakes and may perhaps require a more definite lesson on the error of his ways as a wake up call.  He is not beyond rehabilitation but he may perhaps require a stronger wake- up call in order to mend his ways.

Answer:

I would think Italians Americans to Russian Americans being more related to the cold war

Explanation:

I may be wrong

Answer:

Italian Americans

Explanation:

Supporters of three strikes laws emphasize their deterrent effect, enhanced public safety, and closure for victims. Critics argue that these laws are excessively punitive, contribute to mass incarceration, and overlook the importance of rehabilitation.

Three strikes laws, implemented in some jurisdictions, impose harsh penalties on individuals who commit a third felony offense. Advocates argue that these laws are effective deterrents and ensure public safety by incapacitating repeat offenders. They contend that such laws send a strong message, holding individuals accountable for their actions and preventing recidivism. Moreover, proponents assert that three strikes laws provide closure to victims and their families.

However, opponents argue that three strikes laws are overly punitive and disproportionately affect marginalized communities. They claim that these laws contribute to mass incarceration and strain the criminal justice system. Critics contend that mandatory sentencing removes judicial discretion, leading to unfair outcomes. Additionally, opponents assert that focusing on rehabilitation and addressing the root causes of criminal behavior would be more effective in reducing crime.

To know more about mass incarceration refer here

brainly.com/question/32346356

#SPJ11

Even if you did not mean to be intentional in your discrimination against women, employment discrimination suits can still be brought so this is false.

As long as there is discrimination of women or other protected groups, discrimination suits can be brought.

Discrimination does not have to be intentional or unintentional. The law simply wants to know if there was discrimination. If there was, it is illegal and the intention doesn't count there.

The intention will however count in sentencing and you might receive a lesser punishment for not knowing that you were engaging in discrimination.

Find out more on discrimination at https://brainly.com/question/1084594

#SPJ1

Answer:

What? I Don't understand

Explanation:

The future of departments in five, ten, and twenty years may involve increased integration of technology, data-driven decision-making, and emphasis on community engagement.

To recoup personnel losses, departments can focus on recruitment, retention strategies, and investing in training and professional development.

Hiring practices may adapt to attract diverse candidates, prioritize technological skills, and address evolving challenges in law enforcement.

In five years, law enforcement departments may undergo advancements in technology integration and data analytics.

They may increasingly rely on artificial intelligence and machine learning to analyze large volumes of data for crime prevention and predictive policing.

Body-worn cameras and surveillance technologies might become more prevalent, enhancing transparency and accountability.

In ten years, departments may prioritize community-oriented policing, fostering stronger relationships with the communities they serve. They may invest in specialized training programs focused on de-escalation techniques, conflict resolution, and cultural competency. Emphasis might be placed on diversity and inclusion within the department to reflect the communities they serve.

In twenty years, law enforcement might see further advancements in technology, such as improved forensic techniques and advanced crime-solving tools.

Departments may adapt to changing societal needs, addressing emerging issues such as cybercrime and online security. Collaborations with mental health professionals and social workers may increase to better handle nonviolent and mental health-related incidents.

To recoup losses in personnel, departments may implement competitive recruitment strategies, offering attractive compensation packages, professional development opportunities, and enhanced benefits. Strengthening community trust and addressing public concerns regarding law enforcement may also be crucial in attracting new personnel.

Hiring practices may change to meet the evolving workforce landscape. Departments may focus on recruiting candidates with diverse backgrounds, experiences, and skill sets.

Efforts might be made to improve transparency and accountability throughout the hiring process.

Implementing comprehensive background checks, psychological evaluations, and ongoing training programs can help ensure that officers are well-suited for the challenges they may face and capable of serving their communities effectively.

These predictions are speculative and subject to various factors, including technological advancements, societal changes, and policy decisions. The specific direction of law enforcement departments will depend on a combination of these factors and the needs and priorities of individual communities.

For more such answers on law enforcement

https://brainly.com/question/30773450

#SPJ8

The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.

Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.

To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521

#SPJ11

The theory against prior restriction was explicitly adopted as constitutional law by the Supreme Court in a significant case, making it the first time in legal history.

The Supreme Court's adoption of the theory against prior restraint as constitutional law in the relevant case set a significant legal standard in US history. Instead of punishing the speaker after the fact, prior restraint refers to government efforts to suppress or prevent speech before it is voiced.

With the Court's decision in this case, the doctrine was for the first time expressly acknowledged and applied as a key component of free expression. The protection of free speech in the US has been significantly impacted by this ruling, which also served as the basis for numerous later court conflicts involving free speech and censorship.

Learn more about Supreme Court:

https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

The correct question will be: What did the Supreme Court adopt the theory against prior restraint?

It is true to say that the U.S. Supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court said on Monday that a choice last term holding that the Constitution requires consistent jury decisions for state criminal preliminaries doesn't matter retroactively.

The decision is a misfortune for Thedrick Edwards and many others in Oregon, Louisiana and Puerto Rico, purviews that permitted non-consistent decisions under the steady gaze of the High Court's choice last year in Ramos v. Louisiana.

The 6-3 greater part choice was written by Equity Brett Kavanaugh, who was joined by the court's other moderate individuals.

In her contradiction, Equity Elena Kagan, joined by the court's other two liberal individuals, composed that last year's choice "accompanies a commitment, or in any event."

"On the off chance that the right to a consistent jury is so key - in the event that a decision delivered by a partitioned jury is 'no decision by any means' - then Thedrick Edwards shouldn't consume his time on earth in the slammer more than two hearers' resistance. I consciously disagree," she composed.

To know more about court,visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/29786682

#SPJ4

Hospitals, clinics, and healthcare providers all around the nation are increasingly using an electronic health record, or EHR. More healthcare practitioners are moving away from using paper-based records in favor of digital patient data collecting in a format that can be saved on hard drives and backed up in the cloud.

What are the advantages of implementing EHR?

What are the disadvantages of using an EHR?

Learn more about EHR: https://brainly.com/question/14667795

#SPJ4

Answer:

true beacuse there always part of the mainstream

Answer: B

Explanation:

:)

High temperatures exceed the body's temperature-regulating mechanism, decreasing physical activity and weariness. In high temperatures, sweat, the body's main cooling mechanism, is ineffective, preventing evaporative cooling. Heat stroke and weariness might result.

Generally, Heat stress occurs when the body's temperature regulation system is overwhelmed by high temperatures, leading to decreased ability to perform physical activity and increased fatigue.

Sweat, the body's primary means of cooling, is less effective in very high temperatures, resulting in a lack of evaporative cooling.

This can lead to symptoms such as heat exhaustion and heat stroke.

Read more about Heat stress

https://brainly.com/question/15174745

#SPJ1

The last president to come directly out of the House of Representatives was James A. Garfield, who was elected as the 20th President of the United States in 1880. Garfield served in the House from 1863 to 1880 and was known for his eloquent speeches and passionate advocacy for civil rights and education reform.

Garfield's rise to the presidency was somewhat unexpected. He was a compromise candidate at the Republican National Convention, chosen after several rounds of balloting when the front-runners failed to gain enough support. Despite his lack of national political experience, Garfield went on to win the general election, defeating Democrat Winfield Scott Hancock.Unfortunately, Garfield's presidency was short-lived. He was shot by a would-be assassin just four months into his term and died of his injuries 11 weeks later. Garfield's death sparked widespread mourning and led to calls for increased civil service reform, which eventually resulted in the passage of the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act in 1883.

Read more about National Convention here:https://brainly.com/question/28096856

#SPJ11

Answer:

The criminal justice system is a network of government and private agencies intended to manage accused and convicted criminals. The criminal justice system is comprised of multiple interrelated pillars, consisting of academia, law enforcement, forensic services, the judiciary, and corrections.

Hope I helped