The imagery in these lines evokes a sense of laziness. Fear. Mystery. Despair.

Answer:

hola

Explanation:

Answer:

every instrument put together in one big mess

Explanation:

The most appropriate option that effectively incorporates the source material is: Coghlan (2017) describes how stress can spark changes in the brain that open the way to depression.

In his 2017 article titled "The Link Between Social Stress and Depression," Andy Coghlan explores the correlation between these two factors impacting brain vulnerability.

According to Coghlan, the brain can undergo alterations as a result of events such as bullying, which can cause the blood-brain barrier to become permeable and enable inflammation to enter.

The change in brain activity has the potential to impact emotions and may lead to the onset of depression. Cognizant of the effects of emotional encounters on brain structure, Coghlan's discoveries underscore the correlation between social pressure and mental health ailments.

Read more about source materials here:

https://brainly.com/question/2772106

#SPJ1

Answer:

okay i can :) in like a few minutes just doing some hw rn and i’ll do it

Explanation:

Answer: A) f(x) = g(2x - 1)

Explanation:

Original function = g(x)

The option that correctly defines the function f is f(x) = g(2x - 1). The correct option is A.

Equations that have been solved for y are graphed as functions! In this instance, the graph of f(x) is the graph of y = x2 - 3. Making points for the graph is simple. Select a value for the first coordinate, then calculate the second coordinate by evaluating f at that value.

A relation between a collection of inputs and outputs is known as a function. A function is, to put it simply, a relationship between inputs in which each input is connected to precisely one output. Each function has a range, codomain, and domain.

Original function = g(x)

Compress g(x) horizontally by 2 = g(2x)

Shift to the right by 1 = g(2x -1)

Therefore, the correct option is A. f(x) = g(2x - 1).

To learn more about the graph of a function, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/27757761

#SPJ2

Answer:

Explanation:

Sheet used this year = 270,000

Sheet used last year = 270,000 + 270,000*30%  = 270,000 + 81,000 = 351,000

The equivalent of each unit in SI of Norah's Ark was lenght=137.16m,hieght =13.71m and width= 22.86m and Solomon’s temple at Jerusalem was  lenght =27.432m,hieght =13.71m and width= 9.144m.

In the olden days, God gave Noah the dimensions for the ark in cubits. “This is how you are to make it: the length of the ark 300 cubits, its breadth 50 cubits, and its height 30 cubits” (Genesis 6:15).

The dimensions for the Jerusalem Temple King Solomon built: “60 cubits long, 20 cubits wide and 30 cubits high” (1 Kings 6:2).

the SI unit of length is Meters. Therefore 1 Cubit= 0.4572m;

Calculating  The dimensions of Noarh's Ark;

Length= 300 X 0.4572= 137.16m

Width=50 * 0.4572=22.86m

Height=30*0.4572=13.716m

Calculating the dimensions of  Solomon’s temple;

Length= 60 X 0.4572= 27.432m

Width=20 * 0.4572=9.144m

Height=30*0.4572=13.716m

Learn more about SI units on

https://brainly.com/question/10865248

#SPJ1

Answer:

Final copy

Explanation:

the prophet Muhammad is called Allah

x ² + 2x - 2xy - 2y + y ² = (x ² - 2xy + y ²) + 2 (x - y)

… = (x - y)² + 2 (x - y)

… = 50² + 2 × 50

… = 2600

Answer:. Technician B is correct.

If the ground connection is faulty, the motor won't run.

Explanation:

Philosophical chairs Influence another opposing point with strong evidence backed debate.

Philosophical Chairs - Classic Style is a systematic method of academic discourse that uses a prompt to guide discussion and informed debate. It is a type of discourse in which students gain a more in-depth grasp of a text or subject.

A debate is comparable to Philosophical Chairs. Students are given a primary issue or question on which they must pick whether to agree, disagree, or remain neutral. A fantastic Philosophical Chairs conversation begins with a fantastic subject or question.

Learn mor e about Philosophy:
https://brainly.com/question/13034448
#SPJ1

Answer:

16.67%

Explanation:

I am assuming the probability is of 1 standard dice.

Resultant will be (0.54î - 1.75j) N, Magnitude is 1.83 N, and the Direction is - 72.9°, as per the given equation.

A resultant force is the single force and corresponding torque that are produced when adding vectors to a system of forces and torques acting on a rigid body.

From the free body diagram, the resultant is a vector sum of all the three individual forces.

F₁ = 4(cos 25°î + sin 25°j) = (3.625î + 1.691j) N

F₂ = 6(cos 325î + sin 325j) = (4.915î - 3.441j) N

F₃ = (- 8î) N

Resultant force is

F₁ + F₂ + F₃ = (3.625î + 1.691j) + (4.915î - 3.441j) + (- 8î) = (0.54î - 1.75j) N

Magnitude = √[(0.54²) + (-1.75²)] = 1.83 N

Direction = tan⁻¹ (-1.75/0.54) = - 72.9°

Thus, this is the the magnitude of the total resultant force.

For more details regarding resultant force, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16380983

#SPJ1

Answer:

Weathering (I think)

Explanation:

don't know what else to add because you need a minimum of twenty words to answer

Answer:

B

Explanation:

got it right on edge 2021

The reaction equation is written as;  SO3(aq) + H2O(l) ----> H2SO4(aq).

Learn more about reaction equations: https://brainly.com/question/4146311

Answer:

wanna say gravity

Explanation:

I'm in 8th grade

Answer:

The three policymakers are expressing different views on what a just distribution of the national cake entails, which could stem from different perspectives, values, and beliefs about justice and fairness.

The first policymaker believes in equal distribution, which implies that everyone should receive the same amount of resources regardless of their needs, abilities, and contributions. This perspective is based on the principle of equality, which holds that all individuals are equal and should be treated equally. It seeks to address inequalities and reduce poverty by leveling the playing field and ensuring that everyone has equal opportunities to access basic necessities.

The second policymaker believes in fair distribution, which implies that resources should be distributed in a way that takes into account individual differences and needs. This perspective is based on the principle of fairness, which holds that individuals should be treated in a manner that is consistent with their needs and contributions. It seeks to address inequalities by ensuring that resources are distributed in a way that is proportionate to individual needs and contributions.

The third policymaker believes in giving everyone their due, which implies that individuals should receive what they are entitled to based on their rights and responsibilities. This perspective is based on the principle of distributive justice, which holds that individuals should receive what they are entitled to based on their rights and responsibilities. It seeks to address inequalities by ensuring that individuals receive what they are entitled to based on their rights and responsibilities.

Making progress in such a scenario would require policymakers to find common ground and find ways to balance the principles of equality, fairness, and distributive justice. One way to make progress would be to engage in open and honest discussions to understand each other's perspectives and concerns. This would involve listening actively, asking questions, and seeking to understand the reasoning behind each policymaker's views.

Another way to make progress would be to engage in a thorough analysis of the available data and evidence on the current distribution of resources in the country. This would help policymakers to understand the extent of inequalities and the factors that contribute to them. This information would then be used to develop evidence-based policies that address inequalities and ensure a just distribution of the national cake.

A third way to make progress would be to engage in stakeholder consultations and gather the views of various groups in society, including representatives from different communities, civil society organizations, and business groups. This would provide a broad perspective on the issues and would help policymakers to understand the impact of their policies on different groups in society.

Finally, policymakers could also consider the use of multi-stakeholder partnerships, where various groups in society come together to address common problems and find mutually beneficial solutions. This would help to build trust, foster collaboration, and ensure that everyone has a voice in the policymaking process.

In conclusion, finding a just distribution of the national cake is a complex challenge that requires policymakers to balance the principles of equality, fairness, and distributive justice. By engaging in open and honest discussions, conducting evidence-based analysis, engaging in stakeholder consultations, and using multi-stakeholder partnerships, policymakers can make progress and ensure a just distribution of the national cake.

Answer:

Explanation:

The three policymakers in this scenario have different views on how to ensure a just distribution of the national cake. One believes that an equal distribution is just, another believes in a fair distribution, and the third believes that a just distribution entails giving everyone their due. These differences in perspective could be due to several factors, including their background, values, and life experiences.

The policymaker who believes in an equal distribution may come from a background where equal sharing is emphasized, or they may have a strong belief in equality and social justice. This perspective assumes that everyone has equal needs and that an equal distribution is the most just way to meet those needs.

On the other hand, the policymaker who believes in a fair distribution may take into account factors such as people's needs, abilities, and contributions to society. They may believe that people who contribute more to society should receive a larger share of the national cake or that people with greater needs should receive a larger share to help them meet those needs.

The policymaker who believes in giving everyone their due may believe in a merit-based distribution, where individuals receive a share of the national cake based on their efforts or contributions to society. This perspective assumes that individuals should be rewarded based on their merit and that a just distribution should not be based on equal or fair sharing alone.

To make progress in this scenario, the policymakers need to first recognize and respect each other's perspectives. They can then work towards finding a compromise that takes into account the strengths and limitations of each perspective.

One possible approach is to adopt a hybrid approach that combines elements of each perspective. For example, they could agree to distribute the national cake equally among all citizens, but also provide additional resources to those with greater needs or who have contributed more to society.

Another approach is to identify common values and principles that underpin each perspective, such as social justice, fairness, and merit. They could then use these values to guide their decision-making and ensure that the distribution is in line with these principles.

Finally, it is important to recognize that a just distribution of the national cake requires more than just a fair or equal distribution of resources. It also requires addressing the underlying social, economic, and political structures that create inequality and limit opportunities for some individuals and groups. Therefore, the policymakers need to work towards creating a more just and equitable society by addressing these structural issues.

Answer: B. Plateaus (and plains).

Answer:

A: Tundra

Explanation:

Ap ex