The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the United States and plays a significant role in interpreting the Constitution and federal laws.
Over time, the Court has made landmark decisions that have shaped American society and government. These rulings, often referenced in AP Government Unit 3 readings, demonstrate the Court's power in maintaining a balance between the different branches of government and ensuring that individual rights are protected.
For example, the Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, leading to the desegregation of public schools and marking a significant milestone in the civil rights movement.
The Court's decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973 established a woman's right to seek an abortion under the constitutional right to privacy, shaping the ongoing debate on reproductive rights in the United States.
The Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010 expanded the role of corporations in political campaigns, shaping campaign finance laws and the influence of money in politics.
The Supreme Court also plays a critical role in maintaining a balance between the different branches of government. Through its decisions, the Court can limit the powers of the executive and legislative branches and ensure that they do not exceed their constitutional authority.
This role is essential for maintaining the system of checks and balances established by the U.S. Constitution, which aims to prevent the concentration of power and protect individual rights.
To learn more about supreme court, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ11
Over time, the Supreme Court has rendered decisions in a number of cases that have profoundly influenced American politics and society. These judgements have dealt with a variety of topics, including abortion, voting rights, and civil rights. The most well-known cases include Citizens United v. FEC, Roe v. Wade, and Brown v. Board of Education. As the nation's top court, the Supreme Court's decisions are highly significant and frequently used as precedent in subsequent cases.
The Supreme Court has ruled on various cases over time that have had a significant impact on American government and society. These rulings have addressed issues such as civil rights, voting rights, abortion, and more. Some of the most notable cases include Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, and Citizens United v. FEC. As the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court's rulings carry a great deal of weight and are often cited as precedent in future cases.
learn more about supreme court here
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ11
Utilitarian approach O a. accounts for values such as justice and individual rights O b. None of the given statements O c. says with certainty whether the consequences of our actions will be good or bad O d. It is not the most common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of the way in which it accounts for costs and benefits
can the parties to a contract agree to change the time limit for commencing an action for breach of contract under the uniform commercial code (ucc)?
Unless a contract includes a particular rescission clause that gives a party the ability to end the agreement within a set timeframe.
According to the UCC, what clauses must be present in a contract?Unlike the UCC, which only needs quantity to be mentioned in the contract, common law requires the offer, type of the work, price, quantity, and performance to be included as well.
What is a reasonable period of time under the UCC?tabs at the top. (a) The type, goal, and environment of the action will determine whether or not the time frame for taking it is reasonable under the Uniform Commercial Code. When anything is done at the agreed-upon time or within that window, it is said to be done seasonably.
To know more about rescission clause visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30031740
#SPJ1
a reflection on the key values of the social work profession
Answer:
service, social justice, dignity and worth of the person, importance of human relationships, integrity, and competence.
Explanation:
tama po to..
What is one responsibility of the executive branch of government?
A. to make the laws
B. to judge the laws
C. to enforce the laws
D. to interpret the laws
Sullivan (1992) was one of the first theorists to apply the _____________ to the area of chronic mental illness where clients suffering from mental illness are encouraged to recognize and develop their own personal strengths and abilities.
Sullivan (1992) was one of the first theorists to apply the strengths perspective to the area of chronic mental illness where clients suffering from mental illness are encouraged to recognize and develop their own personal strengths and abilities.
The Strengths Perspective is a social work paradigm that places people, communities, and their environments' strengths and resources, rather than their problems and pathologies, at the centre of the helping process.
The Strengths Perspective emphasises the human capacity for perseverance, resistance, courage, flourishing, and ingenuity, and it advocates for individuals' and communities' rights to define and realise their own goals and aspirations.
Social workers are called upon to work with clients, their families, and communities to uncover and produce hopes and possibilities, to mobilise inner and environmental strengths and resources, and to advocate for individual and community empowerment and social justice.
To know more about strengths perspective, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17012032
#SPJ4
A woman looking at cosmetics in a drug store was noticed by the store
manager because she was not carrying a purse. She was pushing a
shopping cart and put several cosmetic items into the cart. She went to
the checkout stand and paid for all the items but one lipstick, which
remained in the shopping cart. The manager noticed the lipstick in the
cart and followed the female to her car. As the manager approached the
female, she was picking the lipstick up from the cart. When the manager
told her he was arresting her for shoplifting, she said that she did not see
the lipstick in the cart until she got to her car and picked it up to return it
to the store. The lipstick cost $5.99, and the female had $1.09 on her
person. Answer the following questions:
1. Was there any responsibility on the part of the clerk or manager to ensure that
all items were paid for because she left the store? Why, or why not? As to part of
the representative or supervisor, indeed, without a doubt, there exists an obligation. For the
explanation that chiefs ought to be
2. Should she be arrested? If so, on what charges, and why? If not, why not?
Write a statement reflecting your decision as though you were filling out a
police report.
3.
a public policy reason for why courts and legislators have supported imposing strict product liability is that consumers should be protected against unsafe products.
The given statement, "A public policy is the reason for why courts and legislators have supported imposing strict product liability which is consumers should be protected against unsafe products." is true because of product liability.
Courts and legislators have supported imposing strict product liability as a public policy reason because consumers should be protected against unsafe products. Product liability is a legal term that refers to the responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, and retailers to ensure that their products are safe for consumers to use.
Product liability claims can arise when a consumer is injured or experiences a loss due to a defect in the product, or when a product does not perform as advertised. In these cases, the manufacturer, distributor, or retailer may be held liable for any damages or losses suffered by the consumer.
----------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"A public policy is the reason for why courts and legislators have supported imposing strict product liability which is consumers should be protected against unsafe products. (True or False)."--------
To know more about public policy, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30137681
#SPJ4
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties as long as certain conditions are met. Identify these conditions. (Check all that apply.)
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties as long as certain conditions are met. Identify these conditions. (Check all that apply.)
Which of the following characteristics was just recently established (since June 2020) as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964? National origin Race Sexual orientation Sex 10:09 AM Religion
The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.
Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:
https://brainly.com/question/1172086
#SPJ11
Lora files a suit in Michigan against Ned over the ownership of a boat docked in a Michigan harbor. Lora and Ned are residents of Ohio. Ned could ask for a change of venue on the ground that Ohio:
a. Has a sufficient stake in the matter
b. Has jurisdiction
c. Has sufficient minimum contacts with the parties
d. Is a more convenient location to hold the trial
b. Has jurisdiction. Under the doctrine of personal jurisdiction, a court has the power to make binding decisions on a person or entity if the person or entity has sufficient minimum contacts with the jurisdiction in which the court is located.
In this case, both Lora and Ned are residents of Ohio, which suggests that Ohio has personal jurisdiction over both of them. However, whether or not Ohio has jurisdiction over Ned's boat docked in a Michigan harbor is a different question. The question of jurisdiction over property is typically determined by the laws of the state where the property is located. Therefore, the court in Michigan may have jurisdiction over the ownership of the boat, while the court in Ohio may have jurisdiction over the dispute between Lora and Ned.
Learn more about jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
The mayor and city council have a secret meeting to pass a law requiring citizens to pay a special tax for new sewer lines. Which characteristic of rule of law was violated in this situation?
Accountability to the law
Transparency of institutions
Decisions based on the law
Consistent application
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Transparency of institutions
A producer may NOT advertise an insurance product if he/she
A) publishes the ad in a trade journal.
B) points out differences with the competition.
C) uses a policy title to misrepresent the coverage.
D) uses a paid spokesperson.
A producer may not advertise an insurance product if he/she publishes the ad in a trade journal. The correct option is A.
What is the use of advertising to sell insurance?Your insurance company cannot survive without marketing. It is how you develop warm leads from cold calls and expand your company. A well-thought-out marketing plan aids in establishing and maintaining a clientele that comes to your agency first for their insurance requirements.
Producers of insurance are those who work in the insurance industry. The state in which an insurance producer sells insurance requires licensing. It might be necessary to pass a test or adhere to state-specific educational and/or ethical requirements.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about advertising here:
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ1
Which country had the first constitution in the world?
Answer:
San Marino
Explanation:
The Republic of San Marino is considered to hold the world's oldest constitution, which came into force on October 8, 1600. The Constitution is a set of six Latin texts known as “The Statutes of 1600.” It is thought to be the world's oldest surviving national constitution.
suppose a judge sitting on a district court in texas is found to have been accepting monetary bribes from lawyers to rule in their favor on several cases. according to the texas constitution, what is the most likely action to be taken regarding this judge?
When a district court judge in Texas is discovered to have taken bribes from attorneys to decide in their favor on a number of cases, the Supreme Court of Texas will probably take steps to remove the judge from office.
The Judicial Conduct Commission has the authority to remove a judge from office for incompetence in the performance of the duties of the office, willful violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, or persistent violation of rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Texas.
In other words, judges are free to hold office for however long they see fit, and the only way to remove them from through impeachment.
A quorum must consist of seven persons. With the exception of recommendations for a judge's retirement, suspension, or removal, which must be granted by a vote of at least seven members, decisions must be made by most of those present.
To know more about Texas Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/14673579
#SPJ4
Which statement best describes an advantage of indirect democracy over
direct dermocracy?
OA. Itcan better prevent political leaders from serving their own
interests.
O B. It can increase the efficiency of decision making.
O C. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
O D. It can help citizens feel more connected to the government.
Answer:
O B. It can increase the efficiency of decision making.
Explanation:
Having less people to vote typically generates a smaller chance of failing, as well as speeding up the process in which collecting the votes would be quicker and more efficient.
Imagine if the U.S. was a direct democracy. Votes would take weeks if not months to be counted, and there may be large proportions of people's votes thrown out due to failure to fill out forms properly. Recent news has also shown us that large amount of voter fraud already occurs, and this is just with popular votes which does not hold too much weight inside the actual election. If we were to drop indirect democracy for direct democracy, be sure that there will be more fraud from one side, more pressure from the other, and chaos all around.
~
57. Do When people with integrity fail to participate in politics, it leads to A. B. C. D. E. creation of employment opportunities. emergence of bad government. fulfilled electoral promises. human capital development. positive political development.
Answer:
B. emergence of bad government.
Explanation:
If people with integrity fail to participate in politics, it leaves people without integrity. If a politician does not have integrity, the government will begin to become corrupt, which will ultimately led to the emergence of bad government.
Answer:
Explanation:
When people with integrity fail to participate in politics, it leads to the emergence of bad government (option B). This is because when individuals with high moral principles and values do not get involved in the political process, it can create a vacuum that may be filled by individuals who lack integrity, and who may be more interested in advancing their own interests rather than serving the public good. This can lead to a range of negative outcomes, including corruption, abuse of power, and a general erosion of trust in government institutions. By contrast, when individuals with integrity are actively engaged in politics, it can help to promote positive political development, including increased transparency, accountability, and a greater emphasis on ethical behavior and public service.
Determine if the statement is true or false.
A victim, for the purposes of victims' rights law, is a person who was harmed directly by a crime committed by someone else.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Which of the following is not one of the purposes of an internal control system?
Multiple Choice
o The assessment of the degree of compliance with company policies and public laws
o Safeguarding the company’s assets
o The evaluation of performance
o Ensuring that the company is using the most effective marketing plan
Ensuring that the company is using the most effective marketing plan is not one of the purposes of an internal control system.
The primary purpose of an internal control system is to provide reasonable assurance that an entity will achieve its objectives regarding reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and safeguarding of assets.
The objectives of an internal control system are to prevent and detect fraud, error, and mismanagement; verify accuracy of accounts; authorize and record transactions; maintain accountability of assets; improve operational efficiency; and ensure compliance with public laws.
To know more about internal control system , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29870556
#SPJ4
Onyango is employed by Tropical College in Nairobi as a driver while he was transporting some of the college students to the city centre after classes; His attention was diverted when he saw some girls playing netball in a field next to the road. He lost control of the bus which then landed in a ditch and Wafula one of the students aboard was injured. Wafula seeks your advice as to whether he should sue the college or Onyango for damages for negligence. What advice would you give Wafula?
Answer:
I think he should sue Onyango for damages for negligence .....Because it was is fault the bus landed into a ditch ...The college didn't have a problem
Which law has made ethics training even more important?A. Title VII of the Civil Rights ActB. The Fair Labor Standards ActC. Sarbanes-Oxley ActD. The False Claims ActE. The Occupational and Safety Act
The law that has made ethics training even more important is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
What is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act?Federal legislation known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed stringent financial and auditing standards for publicly traded firms. To assist shield shareholders, employees, and the general public from accounting mistakes and dishonest financial activities, legislators enacted the legislation.
The U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30 of that year in an effort to safeguard investors against misleading financial reporting by businesses. 1 Also referred to as the SOX Act of 2002, it required stringent updates to current securities laws and placed severe new penalties on offenders.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act at:
https://brainly.com/question/5481344
#SPJ1
2. A, being a business minded person
decided to put a business (KTV Bar)
beside San Sebastian College, Manila.
As part of
of its promotion, live
entertainment is being offered. Most of
its patrons are students. The operation of
the business starts from 1pm and ends
at 4am. Can the municipal mayor order
the foreclosure
of
business
Yes, the municipal mayor can order the foreclosure of A's business if it is found to be violating any laws or ordinances.
Why can the municipal mayor order the foreclosure ?In the present scenario, the commercial entity is sited in close proximity to an educational institution and facilitates live amusement services. This has the potential to cause disturbance to the students and the vicinal populace.
Moreover, the enterprise conducts its operations from 1:00 PM until 4:00 AM, thus deviating from standard business hours. This phenomenon has the potential to result in the emission of sound waves perceived as excessive by individuals, commonly referred to as noise pollution, as well as other disruptions.
The municipal mayor possesses the authority to implement and uphold legal regulations while safeguarding the welfare of the general public. In the event that a violation of laws or ordinances by A's business is discovered, the individual in question possesses the power to mandate the closure of said business.
Find out more on foreclosure at https://brainly.com/question/13055547
#SPJ1
Question 6
42
Which of the following could not be shipped by mail to a crime lab?
Hair samples
Tire impression mold
Explosive materials
Blood samples
Chemicals used to manufacture methamphetamine can also be used to remove inked writing from checks stolen from the mail.
Select one:
True
False
Keeping a well-maintained vehicle is considered a "best practice" from both a security and safety perspective. True or False
Answer:
Absolutely. The answer is true.
Explanation:
Any time you transport clients you want to ensure that nothing happens from point "A" to point "B". As a result, if the vehicle suddenly becomes inoperable it places an unnecessary risk factor and vulnerability on the client's well-being. The logic here, always have a vehicle that is reliable and has been serviced routinely.
Locke’s purpose in examining the “state of Nature”is
A) To show how primitive human beings lived before they formed societies.
B)To determine the natural rights of human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
C)To show that all governments represents at least marginal improvements to the state of nature.
D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
E)To show the rights to property obtains in the state of nature but not in civil society.
Answer:
b) to determine the natural rights of human beings and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
The purpose in examining the “state of Nature” is To determine the natural rights of a human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power. Thus, option (B) is correct.
What is natural rights?Natural law claims that persons have certain rights. For instance, Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are listed as natural rights in the United States Declaration of Independence.
The right to property, the freedom to criticize the government, and the right to free, and independent thought are all examples of natural rights.
These are universal and inalienable since they are not founded on the laws, customs, or beliefs of any one community or government.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the goal of studying the "state of Nature" is to evaluate a human being's inherent rights and, as a result, the rightful degree of political authority. Hence, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about natural rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/20887193
#SPJ2
Why was the food safety modernization act passed? check all that apply.
The purposes of the Food Safety Modernization Act were:
Many citizens are in danger of contracting a food-borne illness.More people are living with chronic illnesses.Pathogens are becoming stronger and harder to defeat.What is the Food Safety Modernization Act?The Food Safety Modernization Act was enacted to prevent food-borne illnesses and ensure food safety.
The Food Safety Modernization Act overhauled food production regulations, giving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) more authority in overseeing and enforcing food supply chains.
Thus, the Food Safety Modernization Act prevents food-related problems from arising from the production stage to the consumption stage.
Learn more about the Food Safety Modernization Act at https://brainly.com/question/13653111
How do elections impact the supreme court? Discuss how the roles of the president and senate affect the supreme court and how the political makeup of the senate and president can impact it.
Elections can impact the Supreme Court through the roles of the President and Senate. The President nominates justices to the Court, and the Senate has the power to confirm or reject those nominations. The political makeup of the Senate and President can greatly impact the composition and decisions of the Court.
When a Supreme Court vacancy arises, the President has the authority to nominate a new justice. This nomination is then sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration. The Senate Judiciary Committee holds confirmation hearings and then votes to send the nomination to the full Senate for a vote. The Senate can confirm the nominee by a simple majority vote, or they can reject the nominee.
The political makeup of the Senate and President can play a significant role in the confirmation process. If the President and Senate are of the same political party, it is generally easier for the President to get their nominee confirmed.
To know more about Elections, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ4
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities. In the past three years, it has issued over $2 billion in securities, and $1 billion of those securities are in the hands of the public. This very large enterprise:
Answer:
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities, based on all these facts about this company, that is it has issued a lot of money to the public. it is a very large enterprise which is considered to be a "well-known seasoned issuer" and this company is subject to a less restrictive registration proceedings compared to other companies.
What is Lapse and Void Devices
Answer:
void is an empty space; a vacuum or void can be while lapse is a temporary failure;
Explanation:
void is an empty space; a vacuum or void can be while lapse is a temporary failure;
4. What happens when a person or government attempts to deprive someone of something that is necessary to human dignity?
Depriving someone of their fundamental right, translates to robbery and hence going against the Law. Hence, such person has violated the Law and should be tried.
The Rule of Fundamental human right is a very huge and respected law pertaining to individuals living in a democratic country. This means that, the right of other must not be trampled upon, either by other individuals or the government.Therefore, anyone who goes against these law has trespassed and could be face trial.
Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/24087938