Answer:
Persian Gulf War
Explanation:
when an administrator issues a final order, an agent subject to the order may obtain a review of the order in an appropriate court of law request that additional evidence be presented to the court request a hearing 90 days after the final order not appeal a court's decision. True or False
The given statement is false. An agent subject to an administrator's final order may gain a review of the order in court, but they may also appeal the court's decision.
The agent may request that fresh evidence be presented to the court and may request a hail within 90 days of the final order. These options are each available to the agent as part of their right to due process. The director's final order is subject to review and appeal, and the agent has the right to present fresh proof and request a hearing.
The statement needs to be corrected as it doesn't include the full range of options available to an agent in this situation.
To learn more about Appeal court decision:
https://brainly.com/question/29833880
#SPJ4
Which statement is consistent with social disorganization theory?
A.
Individuals with low self-control commit crime.
B.
Neighborhoods with weak social institutions have higher crime rates.
C.
The genetics of the individual are responsible for criminal behavior.
D.
People commit crime in their self-interest.
Neighborhoods with weak social institutions have higher crime rate
Answer: B)
Explanation: got it right on the test
which court case gave the judicial branch the power of judicial review?
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison, which is a significant case that established the power of judicial review (1803).
Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court had the authority to state parliamentary acts to be unconstitutional in this case.
The principle of judicial review was established by this decision, permitting the courts to evaluate whether the other branches of government's laws and other acts are constitutional.
The courts have the power to remove or invalidate laws that they find to be unconstitutional, by respecting the constitution and constitutionally required separation of powers.
This power is called as judicial review.
Learn more about judicial review:
https://brainly.com/question/28179489
#SPJ4
jails never hold more than 1,000 prisoners
true or false
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world. This is despite the national incarceration rate being at its lowest in 20 years. About 25% of the world’s total prison population is in the United States, which holds about 2.19 million prisoners as of 2019 (1.38 million in federal and state prisons, 745,200 in jails).
It false, i got the unit 8 for this question and it false
Explanation:
4. You have just turned 18 in time to vote in the upcoming election. You have studied at length the policies of both candidates running for office and your own values and priorities don’t align with either campaign. Would you go ahead and select one of the candidates or make the decision to not vote in this particular election? Explain the rationality behind your choice.
You have just turned 18 in time to vote in the upcoming election. I would you to go ahead and select one of the candidates. The right to vote is one of the most significant liberties enjoyed by citizens of the United States.
Why is it important to have a fair election?Elections offer a crucial chance to advance democracy and promote political liberalization. Certain civil liberties, like the freedoms of speech, association, and assembly, are necessary for an election to be free and fair. Suffrage, or the ability to vote, is a crucial component of our democracy.
Voting is a process that a group, such as an electorate or meeting, can use to reach a consensus or express an opinion, typically after discussions, debates, or election campaigns. Voting is how democracies choose their leaders for high office.
Learn more about Voting here:
https://brainly.com/question/29573892
#SPJ2
What are some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities?
Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.
- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.
- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.
- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.
These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.
For more such questions on colonization, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27868020
#SPJ8
Jurisdiction refers to witch of the following
Answer:
in Parliament refers to justice
Explanation:
Mark brainliest
Constitutionalism means:
a. Federal government allows states to have some powers b. State surrenders most power to the federal government.
c. State government allows the federal government to have some powers The Federal government is limited to the few powers given to them in Article I section 8
Option a is incorrect,
Option b is also incorrect,
Option c is the correct answer.
Constitutionalism refers to a system of government where there is a constitution that establishes the powers, limits, and rights of the government. It ensures that the government operates within the framework of the constitution, respecting the rule of law and protecting individual rights. In this context, the options provided can be evaluated.
Option a is incorrect as it suggests that the federal government allows states to have some powers. Constitutionalism does not necessarily involve the federal government allowing powers to states.
Option b is also incorrect as it states that the state surrenders most power to the federal government. Constitutionalism is about establishing a balance of power, not necessarily one entity surrendering most power to another.
Option c is the correct answer as it states that state governments allow the federal government to have some powers. This aligns with the principle of constitutionalism, where power is shared between the state and federal government, with each having their own set of powers and limitations.
The phrase "The Federal government is limited to the few powers given to them in Article I section 8" is accurate, as it highlights that the federal government's powers are specifically outlined in the constitution, specifically in Article I section 8.
Know more about Constitutionalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/4932085
#SPJ11
which of the following statements about the American legal system is not true?
A) each branch has a seperate sphere of authority (checks)
B) Each branch of government is subject to review by the other branches (balances)
Answer:
A. Each branch has a separate sphere of authority (checks)
Conservation agents object to legal hunting
Answer:
hunting is not legal but we need to make sure that most animals don't
go extinct but when the growth goes up we need to size down them
Explanation:
The seller told you that a car was the best car she ever owned and that you will love it; you've had one repair bill after another and hate the car. You can get your money back because the seller committed fraud.
true
false
Answer:
The answer is false ....
At least 200 words per question. Just start me off with 100 words and ill finish the rest! THANKS GUYS!!
1. What common problems have existed throughout the centuries for people in law enforcement?
2. Why was there no law enforcement during the daytime for many centuries?
3. What are some of the challenges law enforcement will face with intelligence-led policing as it emerges in the new era of policing?
Answer:
uhhhhh how am i supposed to know this??? u can look it up on the internet lol
Lonnie dies while working on a barge. Lonnie’s widow sues the barge company in state court. The Parties agree on the facts and cause of Lonnie’s death; however, they do not agree whether the Longshoreman Act should apply to this case. Lonnie’s widow has already received a remedy in a separate administrative action as part of a workers’ compensation claim. The Longshoreman Act would allow the decedent’s family to pursue an action in court, even if the family has agreed to a settlement as part of the worker’s compensation action. If the Longshoreman Act does not apply, then the decedent’s family will have no remedy in court. Prior to trial, what motion should the barge company’s attorney make? What must this attorney prove in order for her motion to be successful?
The motion that the Barge Company's attorney should make is that the Longshoreman Act does not apply to Lonnie since he did not sustain any injury while working.
What is the Longshoreman Act?The Longshoreman Act is a federal law that compensates harbor workers and provides certain benefits when they suffer injuries in accidents.
Some of the benefits under the Longshoreman Act include coverage for:
Lost incomeMedical careVocational rehabilitation.Thus, the motion that the Barge Company's attorney should make is that the Longshoreman Act does not apply to Lonnie since he did not sustain any injury while working.
Learn more about making motions in court at https://brainly.com/question/13054707
#SPJ1
When “Great Balls of Fire” played on the jukebox at Brother Jimmy’s BBQ, the bartender poured Bacardi rum onto the bar and lit it on fire. The flame blew back into the bottle of rum and the burning contents shot out. A patron was severely burned and sued the restaurant and Bacardi claiming strict liability. Is Bacardi guilty of Strict Liability? Why or Why Not
If the corporate plan contains exaggerated financial data and is intentionally confusing, an investor should analyze it before investing.
What do financial numbers actually meanA full set of stock or flow data known as financial statistics contains all of the liabilities and assets of an economy's several sectors. You are not the only one, if that is the case. Only 33% of Americans had a written financial plan, according to the Schwab 2021 Modern Prosperity Survey. An investor should examine the corporate plan before investing if it contains inflated financial facts or is purposefully unclear. The term "financial intelligence" refers to the capacity to gauge financial accomplishment and comprehend how the numbers portray or influence an organization's performance. Four essential skill sets can be drawn from it: having a basic understanding of financial management, including knowledge of important financial concepts and how to read financial statements.To know more about financial data visit:
brainly.com/question/24080976
#SPJ1
The Fed BUYS securities using Open Market Operations. What will this do to the money supply?
no change likely
increase it
decrease it
If the Fed buys securities using Open Market Operations, this will B. Increase money supply.
What are Open Market Operations?Open Market Operations (OMO) is a frequently employed instrument utilized by the Federal Reserve (the Fed) to modify money circulation.
Through buying securities, such as Treasury bills or government bonds, from banks, the Fed elevates their reserves. Subsequently, this augmentation heightens the provision of finance available to businesses and consumers, allowing more funds to enter the economy, thus enlarging its monetary supply.
Find out more on Open Market Operations at https://brainly.com/question/14256204
#SPJ1
The supreme court on monday rejected an appeal seeking to give american citizenship to people born in which territory?.
The Supreme Court ruled that he had been unfairly picked out by the police due to his race.Chinese immigrant Lee Yick conducted a laundry business out of a wooden structure in California.
A legislation that was in effect at the time (the end of the 19th century) stated that this type of business could not be operated in a wooden structure without a specific licence. The majority of the laundry facilities were owned by Chinese immigrants, yet this permit was not obtained for them.The Nationality Acts of 1790 and 1870, which stipulate that in order to qualify for US citizenship, a person must either be “white” or a “native American,” were the legal bases on which the US Supreme Court denied US citizenship to Japanese nationals. According to the law of the soil, every person born within the boundaries or within the territories of the United States is immediately granted citizenship, regardless of their background or family history. The law of the soil also grants children the nationality of the country in which they were born, and this is recognized throughout almost all of the world.
To know more about citizenship visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3588983
#SPJ4
Cristina and Jordan have been volunteering with a campus group that works to help underserved populations in the community. A major goal of this program is keeping clients with cognitive or psychological problems out of the criminal justice system. The program also hopes to keep students like Cristina and Jordan interested enough to focus some of their time on these issues once they are out of school.
In the scenario below, you will need to consider these questions as you read:
What are some of the ways that people with mental health issues, developmental disabilities, and head injuries end up in the criminal justice system?
How do cognitive and psychological problems make a person more vulnerable to victimization?
How do cognitive and psychological problems make a person more likely to engage in criminal behavior?
People who have mental disabilities and head injuries end up in the criminal justice system for committing crimes.
What are some of the ways people with mental health problems end up in the criminal justice system?People with mental health problems or developmental disabilities end up in the criminal justice system because they commit criminal acts such as: robbery, murder, attempted murder, damage to private property, among others.
How do these mental problems make individuals more vulnerable to victimization?These problems mean that individuals do not have a complete perception of reality, so they tend to interpret reality in a different way and do not have the ability to rationalize the consequences of their actions. Due to the above, on some occasions they act without thinking about the consequences and commit criminal acts.
How do mental problems cause a person to engage in criminal behavior?As we mentioned before, people with mental and cognitive problems are not fully aware of the consequences of their actions. Due to the above, they usually use excessive force and take some situations very personally, which is why they develop feelings of revenge. This makes these people have no control over their feelings and this leads them to act violently towards others.
Learn more about mental problems in: https://brainly.com/question/27700694
#SPJ1
Jury duty is an example of social contract.
True
O False
what social media platform is now the focus of a bill in congress that might essentially ban it because of its ability to gather data about those in the u.s. who use it?
The social media app TikTok is now the focus of a bill in congress that might essentially ban it because of its ability to gather data about those in the U.S. who use it. It has been accused of using its algorithm to track the activities of its users and then selling that data to third parties.
This bill is being introduced in response to growing concerns about the app's ability to gather data on users in the United States, and about how this data could be used to track and monitor individuals. The bill seeks to ban it from operating in the United States unless the company agrees to restrict its data collection practices and to increase the privacy protections available to American users.
In conclusion, the proposed bill in Congress highlights the increasing concerns over the collection and usage of user data by social media platforms.
To know more about privacy protections go to
https://brainly.com/question/30751214
#SPJ4
Which of the following amendments concern bail for arrested suspects?
Group of answer choices
Answer:
it might be amendment 4 or 6
Explanation:
You are the surety for you nephew's study loan .the bank that gave the loan to your nephew has brought a claim against you. write out a set of valid legal defence for yourself by the commercial law
What type of claim is it? For now I can tell you this. Ask them what is the claim and tell that it's your nephew and you have a relationship with them and that you want a study loan for them for school/college.
Explanation:
(Please explain what type of claim is it.)
"Pro-death" is a loaded phrase? T or F
Answer:
True
Explanation:
which taxpayer would not be considered a material participant of an activity?
A taxpayer who would not be considered a material participant of an activity is: one who fails to meet the specific criteria established by the IRS for material participation.
Material participation is a key factor in determining a taxpayer's ability to deduct losses from passive activities against non-passive income.
To be considered a material participant, a taxpayer must meet one of the seven tests outlined in the Internal Revenue Code Section 469. These tests involve the level of involvement and time spent on the activity, such as spending more than 500 hours annually on the activity or being involved substantially more than any other individual.
A non-material participant would typically be a passive investor or someone who has minimal involvement in the day-to-day management or decision-making of the activity.
This type of taxpayer would not be able to deduct passive losses against non-passive income, which can impact their overall tax liability. It is essential for taxpayers to understand their participation status, as it affects their ability to claim deductions and manage their tax obligations effectively.
In summary, a taxpayer who does not meet the criteria for material participation, as defined by the IRS, would not be considered a material participant of an activity. This classification impacts their tax deductions and overall tax liability.
To know more about IRS, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30401300#
#SPJ11
Stair and Erskine on the development of law
Answer:
Stair, Bell, and Erskine are the most well-known of these. In the 1660s, Stair brought together the elements of customary, feudal, and Roman law into one system based on legal principles and philosophy in his leading work The Institutions of the Law in Scotland (1681).
Explanation:
Hope this helps and have a great day!!!
WILL GIVE BRAINLYIST!
What Enlightenment ideal does this quote show? "That whenever any
Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government .
Declaration of Independence 1776
A.stare decusis
B. federalism
C. separation of powers
D. socal contract
Answer:
Its D. social contract
Explanation:
Just did the quiz and C was incorrect
Throughout the year, Supreme Court justices review cases that have been appealed to the Court. When a session begins, the justices select a handful of cases to more fully review and decide. For each selected case, lawyers for both parties are allowed to make public arguments in an attempt to sway the justices and address their questions. The justices then deliberate and argue the facts of the case. They produce opinions, which can include majority, dissenting, and concurring opinions. The justices vote on which opinion they support, and the opinion with the most votes becomes the final verdict.
Which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process?
A. The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it.
B. Justices do not vote on particular opinions, but rather on the final ruling.
C. Lawyers are not allowed to attempt to influence the justice's opinions in any way.
D. Only appellate court judges are charged with writing dissenting opinions.
The statement that best summarizes the inaccuracies contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process is that the Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it. Hence, Option A is correct.
What is the Supreme Court?The court, which is the highest court in the United States, is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases and the cases that are over state courts are looked after by the Supreme Court.
Any opinion, whether it is of the majority, dissenting or the final court decision, is expressed after hearing arguments from both the parties. They constitute the ruling of the Supreme Court over the case.
According to the given paragraph The Supreme Court firstly reaches a decision and then hears the parts, which is wrong. It is the duty of the Supreme court to hear any case that is appealed to it.
Therefore, Option A: The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it is correct.
Learn more about Supreme court from here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ2
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
Match the police ranks to the appropriate description
Answer:
What do you mean by that?
Explanation:
Wdym..
Prisha is an attorney who is defending a man accused of murdering a police officer. During voir dire, she asks if any jurors have family that are in law enforcement. One man raises his hand, stating that his daughter is a detective. What action would Prisha MOST likely take?
A.
Accept this juror because he is able to be impartial.
B.
Accept this juror because he and the defendant are both men.
C.
Hope that the prosecutions uses a preemptory challenge on the juror.
D.
Challenge the selection of the juror for cause, since he is unlikely to be impartial.
Based on the man's daughter being a detective, Prisha will most likely D. Challenge the selection of the juror for cause, since he is unlikely to be impartial.
Why would Prisha challenge the selection?In picking the jury, both the prosecution and the defendant will try to make sure that the jury is as impartial as possible.
A man whose daughter is a police detective is not likely to be impartial in a case about the killing of a police officer so Prisha should try to reject him.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on jury selection at https://brainly.com/question/5775524.
Question #7
Multiple Select
If you assert your rights under the Sixth Amendment, what are you asking? (Select all that apply.)
That you be protected from incriminating yourself.
U
That the court provide you with an attorney.
O
That the court needs a warrant to arrest you.
That you have a jury for your trial.
Question #8
Answer:
Explanation:
Question #7
Multiple Select
If you assert your rights under the Sixth Amendment, what are you asking? (Select all that apply.)
That you be protected from incriminating yourself.
U
That the court provide you with an attorney.
O
That the court needs a warrant to arrest you.
That you have a jury for your trial.
Question #8