Under current law, an individual must register as a lobbyist if he or she spends at least 70 percent of his or her time lobbying.
In politics, lobbying, persuasion or interest representation is the act of lawfully attempting to persuade the movements, rules, or selections of government officers, most usually legislators or individuals of regulatory groups. Lobbying, which commonly includes direct, face-to-face touch, is completed by using many types of people, associations, and prepared corporations, inclusive of people in the private area, companies, fellow legislators or government officers, or advocacy agencies (hobby agencies). Lobbyists can be among a legislator's constituencies, meaning a voter or bloc of citizens inside their electoral district; they may interact in lobbying as an enterprise. Professional lobbyists are humans whose business is attempting to persuade regulation, regulation, or other authorities' choices, moves, or regulations on behalf of a set or individual who hires them. Individuals and nonprofit corporations also can foyer as an act of volunteering or as a small part of their everyday job. Governments frequently define "lobbying" for felony purposes and alter organized institution lobbying that has become influential.
Learn more about lobbyist here
https://brainly.com/question/509906
#SPJ4
average north american babies double their birth weight by what age?
On average, North American babies double their birth weight by 4-6 months of age.Babies are constantly growing and changing. They start life as tiny, delicate beings and grow and develop at a remarkable pace. One of the most impressive changes that takes place during the first year of life is growth in size and weight.
Babies' growth is monitored carefully by pediatricians and parents alike. One of the most significant milestones in a baby's growth is when they double their birth weight. This typically occurs around 4-6 months of age in North American babies.On average, babies are born weighing 7-8 pounds. Doubling this weight means that they will weigh around 14-16 pounds at 4-6 months old. However, it is important to remember that all babies are different and will grow and develop at their own pace. It is essential to follow your pediatrician's advice and have regular checkups to ensure that your baby is growing and developing normally.
To know more about America visit-
brainly.com/question/19339803
#SPJ11
Why is competition limited in an oligopoly?
In an oligopoly, the market is shared among a few firms. Competition is limited in an oligopoly for various reasons, which are explained below:
Interdependence: In an oligopoly, firms are interdependent on each other. Every firm's decision will affect the other firms' profits and market share. Therefore, firms have to consider their rival's responses before taking any action. Firms are not in a position to decide on the price of the product because the price is linked to the output of the industry.
Pricing strategies: Firms in an oligopoly focus on non-price competition, like product differentiation, branding, and advertising. Firms in an oligopoly tend to differentiate their products to create brand loyalty. This type of competition requires a significant amount of capital, which makes it hard for new entrants.
Barriers to entry: Firms in an oligopoly use several barriers to prevent new firms from entering the market. High capital costs, government regulations, and patents are some of the entry barriers used in oligopolistic markets.
Non-Price Competition: Firms in an oligopoly are not allowed to compete based on prices. Firms need to use different types of non-price competition to compete effectively. Product differentiation, research and development, advertising, and branding are some of the strategies used in an oligopoly to differentiate the products from their competitors'.Thus, competition is limited in an oligopoly because of the interdependence between the firms, non-price competition, entry barriers, and pricing strategies.
Know more about oligopoly here:
https://brainly.com/question/29518761
#SPJ8
Who represents EVERYONE in their WHOLE STATE?
Answer: Members of the U.S. House of Representatives each represent a portion of their state known as a Congressional District, which averages 700,000 people. Senators however, represent the entire state.
Explanation:
Answer:
US senator
Explanation:
What types of discrimination did Justice Ginsburg identify?
Answer:
women’s rights and discrimination based on gender
Explanation:
a bunch of articles will pop up if you look it up online
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
select the case that would clearly be under the exclusive subject matter jurisdiction of the federal courts. treason breach of contract a tort claim for injuries a child custody challenge
The case that would clearly be under the exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction of the federal courts is Treason.
Jurisdiction refers to the scope of the powers that the courts have over specific legal disputes. The jurisdiction of Federal Courts can be divided into two categories:
a. subject matter jurisdiction
b. personal jurisdiction.
Subject-matter jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear a particular type of case. For instance, the bankruptcy court has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy cases. The diversity of jurisdiction, the amount in controversy, and federal questions come under the subject-matter jurisdiction of federal courts. At the same time, personal jurisdiction deals with the extent of the court's power on the party being sued in a case. The U.S. Constitution requires that the court must have jurisdiction over the person being sued in a case and if the party doesn't make an objection to the jurisdiction of the court while being sued, although it hasn't in reality, it would be assumed the defendant is waiving his or her right to challenge the same.
Treason is a crime in which an individual betrays his or her country by taking up arms against it, plotting with its enemies, or providing them with aid or comfort. This crime is often linked with espionage or like activities, which is regarded as one of the most heinous offenses under the law. Treason is a crime under federal law. Therefore, cases involving treason would fall under the exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction of the federal courts.
Learn more about the Subject-Matter Jurisdiction of Federal Courts from: https://brainly.com/question/2123715
#SPJ11
There has been a high rate of bicycle accidents in your community. The local police department has decided to host free bicycle safety seminars at a local community center. The officers who conduct the trainings are being paid for the time they conduct these seminars.
Is this example a public policy?
Answer:
yes they are helping with the incidences of the bicycles
Explanation:
The first ________ amendments to the constitution explicitly limited the power of legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the national government.
The first Ten amendments to the constitution explicitly limited the power of legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the national government.
What is meant by Amendments ?
An amendment is a formally recognized alteration to a statute, agreement, charter, or other legal instrument. Its foundation is the word amend, which means to improve. Parts of these agreements may be added, deleted, or updated by amendments. They are frequently used when editing an existing document is preferable to writing a new one. The amendment procedure is exclusive to the legislative branch.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which added freedoms of speech, religion, the press, and protest; the Third Amendment to the Constitution of Ireland, which permitted Ireland to join the European Union; and the amendment to the German constitution made in 1990 as part of the German reunification process are some of the most well-known constitutional amendments. In certain nations, such as Australia, a nationwide referendum in addition to approval by the parliament or legislature are required for constitutional revisions.
To learn more about Amendments checkout the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ4
Read Aetna v. Pendleton Detectives of Miss 182 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 1999) and draft a brief using the "IRAC" method.
The following summary can be written based on IRAC method.
What happened in the case?The district court made its decision based on Merchants' failure to present compelling proof that the thefts took place while Pendleton guards were on duty. Although Pendleton's security expert, Robert Vause, testified that the theft was more likely than not caused by Pendleton's poor service, the district court dismissed his testimony since his view was based on the permissive security environment created by Pendleton personnel at Merchants' warehouse.
Merchants claims it presented sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding, while Pendleton claims Merchants failed to demonstrate that its workers proximately caused Merchants' losses. Pendleton claims Merchants failed to produce concrete evidence that Pendleton guards were on duty at the time of the crimes. Despite conceding that its security services were subpar.
To learn more about IRAC method visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27726671
#SPJ1
fill in the blank. since godinez v. moran (1993), some scholars have suggested that instead of using terms such as competence to stand trial and competence to plead guilty, use the term____as it is a better way to describe the multiple abilities that criminal defendants are expected to have.
Since the Godinez v. Moran (1993) case, some scholars have suggested that instead of using terms such as competence to stand trial and competence to plead guilty, we should use the term decision-making capacity as it is a better way to describe the multiple abilities that criminal defendants are expected to have.
The reasoning behind this suggestion is that "decision-making capacity" encompasses a broader range of abilities that a defendant should possess in order to effectively participate in their defense and understand the consequences of their decisions.
These abilities include understanding the charges against them, comprehending the legal process, being able to communicate with their attorney, and making rational choices about their case strategy.
By using the term "decision-making capacity," we can emphasize the importance of these various skills and create a more comprehensive assessment of a defendant's abilities in the criminal justice system.
To summarize, since the Godinez v. Moran (1993) case, scholars have recommended using "decision-making capacity" instead of terms like competence to stand trial and competence to plead guilty, as it better captures the multiple abilities criminal defendants are expected to have in order to effectively participate in their defense and make informed decisions about their case.
To know more about Godinez v. Moran, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28216472#
#SPJ11
the reason the uniform commercial code (ucc) is significant is because it clarifies sales law and makes this area of the law: blank .
The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) and the American Law Institute (ALI) jointly developed the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), whose main goal is to ensure that commercial operations are uniform and, consequently, effective, nationwide.
The UCC's goal is to simplify business transactions by removing the formality found in other types of contracts. What happens if the agreement covers both products and services? Contracts for GOODS include goods related to real estate (such as agriculture, minerals, oil, and gas). The Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC") is a body of legislation that establishes legal guidelines for conducting commerce and interactions. Personal property transfers and sales are subject to UCC Uniform Commercial Code regulations. Transactions or finance involving real estate are not covered by the UCC. The Since goods are frequently bought and shipped across state lines, UCC helps to promote uniformity among state laws, which is frequently helpful in commercial sales. When dealing with breach of contract and related civil litigation arising from the sale of goods, the UCC frequently comes into play.
Learn more about Uniform Commercial Code hear :
https://brainly.com/question/18882781
#SPJ4
how did the rise of radicals in france impact wwi
The rise of radicals in France had a significant impact on WWI. The radicalization of French politics resulted in a more aggressive and interventionist foreign policy, which led to France's participation in the war.
The radicals also played a key role in shaping the social and economic policies of France during the war, which in turn influenced the country's military strategy and ability to fight.
Additionally, the radicalization of French society led to a rise in political extremism and social unrest, which further complicated the country's ability to effectively wage war.
Overall, the rise of radicals in France had both positive and negative impacts on the country's involvement in WWI.
Read more about World War 1 at https://brainly.com/question/12233146
#SPJ11
many states hold that a public officer who willfully delays bringing a defendant before a magistrate for the arraignment is guilty of a:
Many states hold that a public officer who willfully delays bringing a defendant before a magistrate for arraignment is guilty of a misdemeanor or other criminal offense.
Arraignment is a critical step in the criminal justice system that takes place after an arrest. It is when the defendant is formally charged with a crime and is informed of their constitutional rights, including the right to counsel. Delays in arraignment can result in prolonged detention, which can violate a defendant's due process rights and create overcrowding in jails.
As a result, many states have laws that require public officers to promptly bring defendants before a magistrate for arraignment. When an officer willfully delays this process, they can be charged with a misdemeanor or other criminal offense. This serves as a deterrent to ensure that defendants' rights are protected and the criminal justice system operates efficiently.
To know more about defendant, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30724930#
#SPJ11
n civil cases, a/an ______________ is filed against the person who is accused of causing harm. That person can then file a/an _____________ challenging those claims.
In civil cases, a/an complaint is filed against the person who is accused of causing harm. That person can then file a/an lawsuit challenging those claims.
What is lawsuit?A lawsuit is an action in civil court brought by one or more parties against another. A lawsuit can be used to resolve private law disputes between individuals, businesses, or non-profit organizations.
Thus, complaint and lawsuit are correct
For more details lawsuit, about click here
https://brainly.com/question/8205151
#SPJ1
Which statement best explains how Kayla can identify her purpose for writing? The word “research” suggests that her main purpose is to learn about the Civil War. The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim. The word “present” suggests that her main purpose is to entertain with interesting facts. The word “cause” suggests that her main purpose is to inform and educate.
Answer:
the answer is B) The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim.
Explanation:
have a good day
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The right to own a gun is found in which Amendment?
O First
O Second
O Third
O Fourth
How would you explain gender differences in the crime rate ? Why do you think males are more violent than females?
What governmental policy could be developed to avoid funneling low-income defendants in the criminal justice system for the sake of revenue?
Which of these le an example of eminent domain?
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Eminent Domain refers to the power of state and federal government's to take private property for public use.
accessory to a crime is a separate offense, usually a
An accessory to a crime is a separate offense, usually a misdemeanor, for assisting the perpetrator of the crime. It is an offense that is separate from the offense committed by the principal actor.
This crime occurs when a person knowingly assists someone else in the commission of a crime, either before or after the crime is committed.What is an accessory to a crime?An accessory to a crime is a person who aids or assists a criminal before, during, or after the commission of the crime. They usually do not take part in the crime itself, but they provide help or support to the person committing the crime. The accessory may provide assistance in a variety of ways, such as by providing transportation, helping to plan the crime, or hiding evidence after the crime.Accessories to crimes may be charged with a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the crime committed. Some states also have laws that make it illegal to assist someone in committing a specific type of crime, such as a drug crime or a gang-related crime.
To know more about misdemeanor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11328028
#SPJ11
Look at Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).
Who is the defendant?
Who is the plaintiff?
Is this a civil case or a criminal case?
What court ultimately decided Obergefell?
look at picture for answer
What is Quasi Contract?
Answer:
What Is a Quasi Contract?
A Quasi Contract is a retroactive arrangement between two parties who have no previous obligations to one another. It is created by a judge to correct a circumstance in which one party acquires something at the expense of the other.
what type of damages are designed to place a plaintiff in the same position as if there had been no breach of the contract? question 18 options: punitive damages specific damages compensatory damages monetary damages exact damages
Option compensatory damages is the correct option.
Compensatory settlements. damages that are intended to put a plaintiff in the same situation as if there had been no contract violation
Actual damages, commonly referred to as compensatory damages in tort law, are financial awards made by a judge that are equal to the loss a party experienced. A court may alternatively award minimal damages if a party's right was formally infringed but they did not experience any hurt or losses.
Actual monetary losses are covered by compensatory damages. For instance, a victim of negligence may file a lawsuit against the offender to recover lost earnings and medical expenses.
Money that is granted to an affected person as compensation for losses, injuries, or other losses is known as compensatory damages. In civil court situations when loss has happened as a result of another party's carelessness or illegal behaviour, compensatory damages are granted.
For such more question on compensatory damages
https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ4
When someone uses libel law as a weapon to prevent speech from occurring, it is generally referred to as:
Answer:
A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
When someone uses libel law as a weapon to prevent speech from occurring, it is generally referred to as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP).
This ultimately implies that, a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a type of injunction obtained by a party, so as to intimidate, censor and silence activists, perceived enemies or critics based on slander, libel, defamation, interference, abuse of power etc. It typically involves a huge amount of money to defend a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)and as such, it used to buy time away from a litigation.
If half the people in the U.S.A are singing that carol baskin killed her husband. AND she is completely psycho. Although tiger king is also psycho. what is the probability she killed her husband and fed him to the tigers
Answer:
carol baskin killed her husband wacked him cant convince her then it didnt happen fed him to the tigers they snaken whats happen??? CAROL BASKIN!
Explanation:
a defamatory statement must be communicated to a third party to be actionable.a. trueb. false
The answer is A, true. In order for a statement to be considered defamatory and therefore actionable, it must be communicated to a third party.
The answer is A, true. In order for a statement to be considered defamatory and therefore actionable, it must be communicated to a third party. This means that the statement must be shared with someone other than the person it is directed towards. If the statement is only made to the person it concerns, it is not considered defamatory or actionable. However, if the statement is communicated to a third party and damages the reputation of the person it concerns, then it may be considered defamatory and the person who made the statement may face legal consequences. It is important to be mindful of what we say and how we say it, especially in public or online forums where our statements can easily be shared with others.
To know more about defamatory visit: https://brainly.com/question/13264091
#SPJ11
Everyone has the right to seek safety in another country if his own country goes against the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Answer:
correct
Explanation:
Criteria and Procedure Regarding Intemperate Use and Lack of Fitness in Eligibility and Disciplinary Matters
Answer:
The criteria and procedures regarding intemperate use and lack of fitness in eligibility and disciplinary matters may vary depending on the specific context, such as the organization, institution, or sport involved. However, here are some general guidelines:
Intemperate Use: This refers to the use of substances, such as drugs or alcohol, to a degree that impairs an individual's ability to perform their duties or responsibilities. Ineligibility and disciplinary measures may be taken if an individual is found to have engaged in intemperate use.
The criteria for intemperate use may include:
Evidence of substance abuse or addiction, such as drug tests, medical records, or witness statements.
Evidence of behavior that is consistent with substance abuse or addiction, such as missed work or school, erratic behavior, or conflicts with others.
Evidence of impairment, such as poor performance, accidents, or injuries.
The procedures for addressing intemperate use may include:
Counseling or treatment programs aimed at helping individuals overcome substance abuse or addiction.
Suspension or termination of employment or membership in an organization or sport.
Legal consequences, such as fines or criminal charges, depending on the severity of the offense.
Lack of Fitness: This refers to an individual's inability to meet the physical or mental requirements of their duties or responsibilities. Ineligibility and disciplinary measures may be taken if an individual is found to be unfit.
The criteria for lack of fitness may include:
Evidence of medical or psychological conditions that prevent an individual from performing their duties or responsibilities.
Evidence of poor physical or mental health, such as frequent absences or decreased performance.
Evidence of behavior that is inconsistent with the requirements of the job or role, such as safety violations or inability to complete tasks.
The procedures for addressing lack of fitness may include:
Medical or psychological evaluations to determine the individual's ability to perform their duties or responsibilities.
Accommodations or adjustments to the job or role to help the individual perform their duties or responsibilities.
Termination of employment or membership in an organization or sport if the individual is unable to perform their duties or responsibilities, even with accommodations or adjustments.
Explanation:
Two police cars are chasing a suspected
bank robber. If one police car cuts through
the park, it can get in front of the suspect's
car and trap it between the patrol cars. Determine if this is allowed or no allowed based on “Vehicles prohibited in parks” law, explain why.
Answer:
Explanation:
Because i we drive our car in the park it will hit someone
1- Why is it important in a democratic society that the government follow due process of law
when trying suspected criminals?
Answer:
It is not, in a Democracy trials and Juries are ruled by passion and prejudice, without regard to established rights of the accused.
Explanation: