Yes, it is true that unless otherwise posted, a speed limit of 100 kilometers per hour (kph) (62 miles per hour (mph)) applies to all vehicles on all highways and roads in Germany.
However, it is important to note that there are some exceptions to this rule. For example, some sections of the Autobahn, Germany's famous highway system, do not have a specific speed limit posted.
In these areas, drivers are expected to use their judgment and adjust their speed based on weather conditions, traffic volume, and other factors.
Additionally, there are some areas where specific speed limits are posted due to safety concerns, such as near construction zones or in residential areas. It is important for drivers to pay attention to signage and adjust their speed accordingly in order to ensure their safety and the safety of others on the road.
To know more about speed limit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29632218
#SPJ11
What benefit does active monitoring have over passive monitoring?
A
O A.
OB.
O C.
COD.
The offender is responsible for checking in with their probation officer.
The probation officer can locate the offender at any time using GPS.
There is less need for expensive electronic devices than there is in passive monitoring.
The offender must spend the nights and weekend in a real prison.
Answer: B
Explanation: Active analysis is more effective than passive monitoring because it is proactive and allows you to identify problems before they occur. Passive monitoring is reactive and requires time to detect issues.
Which of the following are local issues that escalated into national issues? how much time working parents need to have to care for their children not having anyone to take care of a new child in the family
how often trash pick-up should occur
not having rules or regulations set for using dog parks
how many people should be elected to the city council
Answer:
no idea. b
Explanation:
sorry i dont no
a car crash woke john from his afternoon nap. when he looked out his apartment window, he saw several people milling around two smashed cars. he decided not to dial 911 because he assumed someone had already called. john's reaction is an example of the bystander effect pluralistic compliance obedience to authority conformity to social norms dispositional attribution
A: conformity to social norms
B: obedience to authority
C: pluralistic compliance
D: the bystander effect
Answer: the bystander effect
The bystander effect is John's response to the car accident. (D)
He did not feel compelled to dial 911 because he assumed someone else had already done so.
The bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon in which individuals are less inclined to offer assistance in an emergency situation when others are present. The assumption is that someone else would intervene or assume responsibility for the situation.
The effect has been proven in several studies, and it is thought to occur due to the following reasons: diffusion of responsibility, social influence, and evaluation apprehension.Social norms refer to the unwritten rules that govern the behavior of a group of people. (D)
Conformity to social norms is when an individual adjusts their behavior, attitudes, or beliefs to align with those of a group. People frequently conform to social norms to be accepted, to feel good about themselves, or to avoid conflict.
However, if a person's opinions or values differ significantly from those of the group, conformity to social norms may be challenging, and individuals may opt for individualism instead.
To know more about bystander effect click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29775854#
#SPJ11
63. drivers who are under 21 years old with a bac of .02 or above may lose their license due to which law?
Answer:
Explanation:
The law that applies to this situation varies depending on the country or state you are in.
In the United States, most states have a zero-tolerance policy for drivers under the age of 21 who are found to have any measurable amount of alcohol in their system. This is typically referred to as a "zero tolerance law." Under this law, drivers under 21 years old with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .02 or above can face penalties such as license suspension or revocation, fines, and mandatory alcohol education programs.
It's important to note that the specific penalties for violating this law can vary by state, and the legal drinking age is also different in some countries. It's always best to check your local laws to ensure you understand the specific regulations and penalties that apply to your situation.
According to the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, drivers who are under 21 years old with a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) of .02 or above may lose their license.
The Zero Tolerance Law was designed to protect underage drivers from the dangers of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. When a driver under the age of 21 is found to have a BAC of .02 or higher, their license will be automatically suspended for a certain amount of time. This law was put in place to discourage underage drivers from drinking and driving, as the consequences for doing so are much more serious than for adults.
Here you can learn more about zero tolerance law https://brainly.com/question/30706389
#SPJ11
When a commercial real estate sale has two Agent sales associates the broker may create a?
When a commercial real estate sale involves two agent sales associates working under a broker, the broker may create a co-brokerage agreement or a dual agency arrangement.
A co-brokerage agreement is a contractual agreement between two real estate brokers, each representing different parties involved in a transaction. In this case, the broker representing the seller and the broker representing the buyer collaborate to facilitate the sale. The agreement outlines the responsibilities, duties, and compensation arrangement between the two brokers.
Under a co-brokerage agreement, the brokers typically share information, work together to market the property, coordinate showings, negotiate terms, and assist in the closing process. The agreement specifies how the commission will be divided between the brokers, typically based on a predetermined percentage or a negotiated split.
On the other hand, a dual agency arrangement occurs when the broker represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. In this scenario, the broker acts as a neutral intermediary, facilitating the transaction while maintaining impartiality.
know more about intermediary here:
https://brainly.com/question/29732040
#SPJ8
the most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the united states was
Answer:
The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States. The development of universal manhood suffrage.
The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States was the establishment of the Constitution, which laid the foundation for a democratic government by creating a system of checks and balances, protecting individual rights, and promoting the principle of majority rule.
The most obvious indicator of the supremacy of democracy in the United States is the fact that the country is governed by a system that places ultimate power in the hands of the people. This is achieved through free and fair elections, where every citizen has the right to vote and express their opinions on the issues that matter to them. The fact that the United States has been able to maintain a stable democracy for over two centuries is a testament to the strength and resilience of this system. Additionally, the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights enshrine the principles of democracy, including the protection of individual rights and freedoms. These documents provide a framework for the government to operate within, and ensure that the voices of the people are heard and respected. Overall, the supremacy of democracy in the United States is evident in the country's political institutions, legal system, and culture.
learn more about democracy
https://brainly.com/question/21256069
#SPJ11
25) what was the key reason for the creation of law courts during the early development of the english common law?
The key reason for the creation of law courts during the early development of English common law was basically to provide a fair and efficient system for resolving disputes and enforcing laws in the country.
The common law system, that developed in England in the Middle Ages, played a greater emphasis on the role of judges in making decisions based on custom, precedents, and reason, rather than relying solely on written laws or edicts from a monarch. It further led to the creation of law courts to hear and decide these cases, and also established a legal precedents that would guide future decisions.
The overall development of the English common law system and its various courts helped in creating a more stable and predictable legal framework, it also played a key role in the growth and development of English society.
To know more about English common law refer to-
brainly.com/question/7413269#
#SPJ4
13. Supporters of Madison's view about the inclinations of members of Congress could point to which of the follow ing actions ? (A) Members of Congress voting to authorize increased military spending (B ) Members of Congress using earmarks to direct federal money to local projects Members of Congress requiring federal oversight for cleanup of toxic waste sites ( ) Congress authorizing the use of states " National Guard units to patrol the country's borders
Answer: (B ) Members of Congress using earmarks to direct federal money to local projects
Explanation:
James Madison believed in a strong federal government that would yet be balanced by the members of Congress being both loyal to the nation as a whole and to their states.
He believed that state governments should not worry too much about the federal government taking power from them because members of Congress were from various states and would work to advance the interests of those states at a federal level.
Supporters of this view would point to members of Congress using earmarks to direct federal funding. A process which allowed Members of Congress to fund projects in their home states directly from federal funds which showed that the members of Congress were advancing state interests at a federal level.
HELP! FOR LAW STUDIES. 100 POINTS!!!
"The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."
—Patrick Henry
From what you know about the Constitution, do you agree with Patrick Henry's statement? Why or why not?
Patrick Henry was a leader of the Anti-Federalists. How does this quote support their position on the Constitution?
How does Henry's statement reflect the idea of social contract? How does the idea of social contract protect people's natural and individual rights?
What is the current ruling on drug testing minors in public schools? Do you agree or disagree?
Answer:The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."—Patrick Henry1.
Explanation:
analyze the cases in the Questions and Problems.
Case 6
The Garden City Boxing Club held exclusive satellite licensing rights for a live broadcast of a boxing match between Oscar De La Hoya and Fernando Vargas. Luis Dominguez owned Antenas Enterprises, the installer of a satellite account at Mundelein Burrito restaurant. However, Antenas listed Mundelein Burrito as a residence instead of a commercial location. A commercial establishment could show the boxing match only if it was contractually authorized by GCB to do so and if it paid the appropriate fee of $20 times the maximum fire code occupancy of the establishment. Mundelein Burrito showed the event to its patrons. However, because Mundelein Burrito was classified as a residence, it did not pay the proper fee for a commercial establishment. The Garden City Boxing Club filed suit against Dominguez, the sole proprietor of Antenas, to collect the lost fees from the boxing match. As a sole proprietor, should Dominguez be held personally liable for Antenas Enterprises' actions? [Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Luis Dominguez. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38184 (2006).]
, write an analysis of the issue based on the following criteria: Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).
Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns. Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties).
Provide a judgment on who should win the case - be clear. Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.
Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view.
In the case of Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Luis Dominguez, the parties involved in the dispute are the Garden City Boxing Club (GCB) as the plaintiff and Luis Dominguez as the defendant.
The facts associated with the case are as follows: Luis Dominguez owned Antenas Enterprises, which installed a satellite account at Mundelein Burrito restaurant.
Antenas mistakenly listed Mundelein Burrito as a residence instead of a commercial location. The Garden City Boxing Club held exclusive satellite licensing rights for a live broadcast of a boxing match between Oscar De La Hoya and Fernando Vargas. According to the contract, a commercial establishment could show the boxing match if it was authorized by GCB and paid the appropriate fee based on the maximum fire code occupancy of the establishment.
Mundelein Burrito, although classified as a residence, showed the boxing event to its patrons without paying the proper fee for a commercial establishment. As a result, GCB filed a lawsuit against Luis Dominguez, the sole proprietor of Antenas Enterprises, to collect the lost fees from the boxing match.
The legal issue in question is whether Dominguez, as a sole proprietor, should be held personally liable for the actions of Antenas Enterprises.
In this case, Dominguez should be held personally liable for Antenas Enterprises' actions. Under the principle of "piercing the corporate veil," a court may disregard the legal entity of a corporation or business entity and hold the individual owner personally liable if it is proven that the individual has not properly maintained the separation between their personal and business affairs.
In this case, Dominguez, as the sole proprietor of Antenas Enterprises, failed to correctly classify Mundelein Burrito as a commercial establishment, leading to the improper showing of the boxing match without paying the required fee. By neglecting to follow the contract terms and incorrectly representing the establishment, Dominguez can be held personally liable for the lost fees.
The appropriate rule of law that supports this decision is the principle of piercing the corporate veil, which allows the court to hold the individual owner personally liable for the actions of the business entity when they have not maintained proper separation between personal and business affairs.
While it is essential to consider other perspectives, in this case, the judgment would be in favor of GCB. By failing to classify Mundelein Burrito correctly, Dominguez breached the contract terms, resulting in financial loss for GCB. Dominguez's responsibility as the sole proprietor includes ensuring the correct classification of establishments and complying with contractual obligations.
In summary, based on the facts and legal principles involved, Dominguez should be held personally liable for Antenas Enterprises' actions. The principle of piercing the corporate veil supports this decision, as Dominguez failed to maintain the separation between personal and business affairs, leading to the improper showing of the boxing match without the required fee.
To know more about contractual visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27899951
#SPJ11
which party should request a letter regarding litigation, claims, and assessments from the client's attorney
In general, when the content is loaded, the party who should request a letter regarding litigation, claims, and assessments from the client's attorney is the purchaser.
The purchaser should request a letter regarding litigation, claims, and assessments from the client's attorney in order to verify the amount of liability that could be imposed on the purchaser due to the ongoing litigation or claim.Here is a 250-worded detailed answer:When a property is being sold, the seller's attorney usually issues an estoppel certificate that verifies the legal status of the property.
If there is any litigation or claims ongoing, this certificate will include any pending legal or financial issues that could affect the property's value or future liabilities.The estoppel certificate should be read carefully, and if there is any ongoing litigation, a letter should be requested from the client's attorney regarding litigation, claims, and assessments that could affect the property's value or future liabilities.
The party who should request a letter regarding litigation, claims, and assessments from the client's attorney when content is loaded is the purchaser. This is because the purchaser is the one who will be responsible for any future liabilities of the property. By requesting this letter, the purchaser will be able to verify the amount of liability that could be imposed on them due to the ongoing litigation or claim.The letter from the client's attorney should include details about any pending litigation or claims against the property, any assessments or taxes that are due or may become due, and any other financial or legal issues that could affect the property's value or future liabilities.In conclusion, when content is loaded, the purchaser should request a letter regarding litigation, claims, and assessments from the client's attorney. This will help them verify the amount of liability that could be imposed on them due to the ongoing litigation or claim.
To know more about litigation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15284945
#SPJ11
According to the Whittaker reading 'state sovereignty' is both necessary foundation of the United Nations that allows it to exist and it's greatest barrier to action. How does 'state sovereignty' represent this dichotomy?
State sovereignty is both essential to the functioning of the United Nations and a significant hinderance for its potential efficacy.
It acts as the foundation for UN values and principles, as it affords members the right to self-determination, independence, freedom, and the right to promote their own interests. However, the very notion of state sovereignty restricts the UN from acting and responding to global challenges in a unified and decisive manner.
As sovereignty is limited only to the state, it makes it difficult for the UN to exercise collective will, as members may not be willing to make collective decisions in the face of intervention and sovereignty infringements. This lack of cohesion creates a paradox between the nations and the UN, as state sovereignty is the prerequisite for the UN to exist, yet serves as a major barrier to its effectiveness.
To know more about State sovereignty , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28386639
#SPJ4
You are examining evidence from an old crime scene. You have a blood sample, but you believe that the sample may be too degraded to get DNA from. You decide to try to retrieve mtDNA from the sample and compare it to a sample from your suspect. What information could this sample give you?
Answer:
This simple could give a close relative to the person, or to the EXACT person, then that is when investigators, checks alibis at the time of the incidence, or check footages in the Area to see if the person appeared on any (I know that they would probably get the footage the day it was called).
what are the marine corps general orders?
The general orders made by the Marine Corps are in the sense of reporting the violation of order to be instructed and enforced upon in that sense.
The general orders may be ideally taken interpretation for better understanding as the orders that can be made by the authorities under the general capacities in all conditions and situations related thereto. It is noteworthy to mention that the general orders and special orders are completely in contrast to each other.
Learn more about general orders here:
https://brainly.com/question/30396842
#SPJ4
1. How does social learning theory differ from the psychoanalytic theory? Consider the implications of each theoretical model for responding to delinquent youth.
Answer and Explanation:
The theory of social learning states that the actions and ways of acting of young delinquents are the result of living with delinquent adults. This is because children have the ability to repeat the behavior of adults, taking for themselves the activities they do. Thus, according to this theory, young delinquents are victims of an inhospitable environment where they live with criminal adults and end up learning these practices.
Psychoanalytic theory, on the other hand, asserts that the acts, activities and personalities of young deliquesentes are innate elements of their id, ego and superego. This indicates that the criminal activities in which they are involved have been reasoned by their own minds and that, therefore, it is necessary to understand their personalities to reach a conclusion about their crimes.
a witness testifying in a court or legislature may never be sued for defamation.
T/F
True, a witness testifying in a court or legislature may never be sued for defamation. This is because witnesses have testimonial immunity, which protects them from defamation lawsuits while providing testimony.
This statement is generally true. Witnesses who testify in court or before a legislature are generally protected by a privilege from being sued for defamation for statements they make while testifying. This privilege is based on the idea that it is important to encourage witnesses to speak candidly and freely without fear of being sued for their statements. However, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as if the witness acted with malice or made statements outside the scope of their testimony.
Learn more about defamation: https://brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ11
7
You are watching a movie about ancient Rome when a scene of a court case appears. You see that the court hearing is being held outside around
the town square or market. What can you reasonably infer about this case?
O A
O B.
OC.
O D.
The court case was about a minor offense.
The accused was a part of the elite class.
A corporeal punishment was about to be given.
The case involved a violent crime.
If the court hearing is being held outside around the town square or market then the court case was about a minor offense.
Roman legal procedure was a long-evolving system utilised in Roman courts that eventually served as the foundation for contemporary procedure in nations with civil law. There were three major, overlapping phases of development: the legis actiones, which lasted from the late 2nd century BCE until the end of the 5th century BCE law code known as the Twelve Tables; the formulary system; and the cognitio extraordinaria, which was in use during the post-Classical period. The legis actiones procedure was broken down into multiple phases.
To know more about Civil Law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ1
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
PLZ HELP
What is usually the maximum fine for an individual convicted of a minor crime?
A.500
B.10000
C.1000
D.25000
Answer:
C
Explanation:
When I looked more into it, information on certain sites stated that it depended on the minor crime, the most I could find was someone saying 2000. One can only assume the closest number though.
Keep in mind that I'm no expert and just looked it up ;-; I tried to help though
Answer:
C.1000
Explanation:
A federal employee alleging a userra violation may not file a complaint directly with the mspb. The employee must first file a complaint with vets. True or false?.
The given statement is true.
What is userra violation?
The U.S. Department of Labor, Veterans Employment and Training Service (VETS) stands authorized to research and resolve complaints of USERRA violations. Penalties for USERRA violations can result in the expense of lost wages and/or benefits. Attorney's fees are also awarded to the general party. In addition, liquidated injuries may be unrestricted for willful violations. An individual may also elect to file a USERRA claim directly with the Board if he or she determines not to pursue the contribution of the Secretary of Labor and the Office of Special Counsel.
These workers contain politicians, judges, officials, and uniformed service components that work for the Executive, Legislative or Judicial branches of government. As well as civilians working in the Postal Service, law enforcement, public health, employees and clerical employees at different government agencies
To learn more about federal employee refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/26660343
#SPJ4
A local government has plans to build a new transit station on a site where
several homes are currently located. The residents do not want to move. How
does the Fifth Amendment affect this case?
OA. It means that the state has power over the residents' property.
B. It says that the government can take the land but must pay a fair
price to the owners.
C. It requires the government to do a study to determine whether
alternative sites might be available.
D. It states that the government must pay double the property value
for residents' homes.
(Apex)
The way the Fifth Amendment affects the case is B. It says that the government can take the land but must pay a fair price to the owners.
What does the Fifth Amendment say ?The Fifth Amendment of the U.S Constitution incorporates the Takings Clause, which states that private property should not be taken for open utilize without fair remuneration.
This implies that on the off chance that the government serious to procure private property, such as the homes in this case, for open utilize like building a travel station, they have the specialist to do so but must give reasonable stipend to the property proprietors. The reasonable recompense is ordinarily decided by evaluating the showcase esteem of the property.
Find out more on the Fifth Amendment at https://brainly.com/question/20869899
#SPJ1
Which of the following is not usually a divisive issue in American politics?
Answer:
try looking it up
Explanatio
If I was a reporter in the country of Washington D.C and the President sent the Secret Service and they told me that I cannot report anything about the president anymore. What amendment is the government infringing on (what amendment protects me from that)?
Answer:
The First Amendment
Explanation:
In the United States Constitution, the First Amendment state that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Thus, Freedom of the PRESS is part of the United States First Amendment, that protects the right of individuals to acquire and disseminate data or viewpoints without government censorship or concern of penalty.
Hence, in this case, the amendment the government is infringing on is THE FIRST AMENDMENT
what happens if you unknowingly deposit a fake check
If you deposit a fake check, you could be held liable for the money on it. You can also be responsible for any losses the bank incurs as a result of your deposit.
What Happens If A Fake Check Is Accidentally Deposited?
If you have a bank account, an overdraft fee may probably be charged. The bank will charge you for the amount the fake check overdrew. An overdraft may cost hundreds of dollars.You might lose your job if this causes you to be fired.It will affect your credit history when you're ready to apply for new loans and mortgages.You may also be required to pay back the person who wrote the check if they lost money as a result of your depositing a fake check into their account. Restitution might be expensive to repay in order to repair the relationship with that person.To learn more about overdraft fees visit;
https://brainly.com/question/1739416
#SPJ4
As Vincent gets older, he tends to look for high-paying jobs, watch for sales, and search for items and opportunities that invite happiness and
fulfillment. What does Vincent's behavior demonstrate?
OA the law of supply and demand
OB. entrepreneurial ability
OC lens of scarcity
OD. rational self-interest
Answer:
the right answer is rational self interest,
Explanation:
i just took the quiz
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 states that its purpose, in part, is to require that real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions be performed ______.
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.
What exactly is the 1989 Enforcement Act?
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:
Regulations to ensure that real estate appraisals are properly performed. This includes the need for complete and accurate documentation, as well as training for appraisers and their supervisors.The Resolution Trust Corp. was established temporarily to resolve the status of the nation's failed savings and loan institutions.The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation was abolished, and two funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation were established: the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) to cover S&Ls, and the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) to cover banks.The Federal Home Loan Bank Board was abolished, and two new agencies were established to replace it: the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14620330
#SPJ1
What are some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities?
Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.
- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.
- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.
- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.
These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.
For more such questions on colonization, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27868020
#SPJ8
The enumerated powers of congress and the national government are those.
The enumerated powers of Congress and the national government are Levying taxes, regulating trade, creating a standard rule of naturalization, establishing federal courts, creating and maintaining a standing army, and declaring war are all among the enumerated powers. This is further explained below.
What is Congress?Generally, Congress is simply defined as a gathering of representatives from several organizations; often members of a political party, a labor union, or experts in a specific field who have been invited to participate in a series of sessions to debate issues of mutual interest.
In conclusion, Congress stands to check the president.
Read more about Congress
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ1
true or false the law of demand says that when the price of a good goes up the quantity people will demand will always go down.
The given statement "The law of demand says that when the price of a good goes up the quantity people will demand will always go down" is true because it states that if the cost of a commodity increases, the quantity demanded decreases, and if the cost of a commodity decreases, the quantity demanded increases.
The Law of Demand states that all other factors being equal, as the price of a good or service increases, the quantity of goods or services that consumers will purchase decreases, and vice versa. This law demonstrates a negative correlation between the cost of a good or service and the amount demanded. This law applies to all products and services, including luxury goods and necessities, and it is a fundamental principle of economics.
Learn more about Law of Demand here: brainly.com/question/1222851
#SPJ11