Answers
Answer:
fueling economic growth, supporting good jobs at home, raising living standards and helping Americans provide for their families with affordable goods and services.
Explanation:
because trade is critical to americas posterity
Related Questions
Graydon and Emma enter into a contract that requires Graydon personally to paint a mural for Emma on her garage door. Graydon assigns his rights and delegates performance of his duties to Roy. Emma refuses to permit Roy to do the work, employs another painter (at a higher price), and brings an action against Graydon, claiming as damages the difference between the contract price and the cost to employ the other painter.
1. Will Emma prevail? Does Graydon have the right to delegate his duty to paint the mural to another person (Roy)?
Answers
After looking at the contract we can say, Emma will not prevail, and Graydon has the right to delegate his duty to paint the mural to another person (Roy).
What is a contract?A contract is an agreement or a promise between two or more parties to do something, not to do something, or to exchange something of value. Contracts can be written, oral, or implied, and they can be formal or informal. In this case, Graydon and Emma entered into a contract, and Graydon delegated his duty to Roy.
When a duty is assigned, the assignor is still responsible for performance, so Graydon remains responsible for the work to be done by Roy. Emma has no legitimate claim against Graydon because the delegation was permissible, and it was her responsibility to permit Roy to perform the work.
Emma hired another painter at a higher price and then claimed damages from Graydon, which is not appropriate. Emma cannot seek damages because Graydon fulfilled his obligation by delegating his duties to Roy, and Emma refused to accept Roy's work.
To know more about contract, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32254040#
#SPJ11
Why was the era of Roman Emperor Justinian I (529–534) considered significant for the concept of laws throughout history?
Responses
Justinian I studied the law and brought attention to a wide variety of legal details.
Justinian I studied the law and brought attention to a wide variety of legal details.
Justinian I was responsible for codifying many laws into a unified source of civil law.
Justinian I was responsible for codifying many laws into a unified source of civil law.
Justinian I traveled throughout the Roman Empire in order to obtain the wishes of all his citizens.
Justinian I traveled throughout the Roman Empire in order to obtain the wishes of all his citizens.
Justinian I gathered all the legal experts to show how consensus is used in creating laws.
Justinian I gathered all the legal experts to show how consensus is used in creating laws.
Answers
Answer:
The era of Roman Emperor Justinian I (529-534) was significant for the concept of laws throughout history because of the creation of the Code of Justinian. The Code of Justinian was a collection of laws that were compiled and revised during Justinian's reign[1]. The Code was a comprehensive set of laws that covered all aspects of Roman life, including civil law, criminal law, and commercial law. It was considered a significant achievement because it brought together all the laws of the Roman Empire into one unified code[2]. Justinian considered it his divine duty to restore the Roman Empire to its ancient boundaries and wanted to reform the government and legal system, which had long suffered from corruption and outdated laws[3][4].
The exclusionary rule states that Group of answer choices federal law cannot be applied in state courts. the laws of one state court cannot be applied in the courts of another state. evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. state law cannot be applied in federal courts. none of the above.
Answers
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Therefore option (C) is the correct answer.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. This rule prevents police officers from using evidence that they have collected in violation of an individual's constitutional rights. Therefore, if the court finds that evidence was obtained through illegal means, it will not be allowed to be used during a trial.The exclusionary rule does not prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in all circumstances. The rule only applies if the evidence was obtained in a manner that violates a person's constitutional rights.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. This means that if the evidence is collected in violation of a person's constitutional rights, it cannot be used in court against that individual. In summary, the correct option for the question is: Evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Option (C) is correct answer.
Learn more about exclusionary rule https://brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ11
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answers
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
which of the following matters generally is included in an auditor's engagement letter? a. management's responsibility for the entity's compliance with laws and regulations.
Answers
The engagement letter for an auditor often outlines matters generally and duties of the auditor and management, the foundation for the auditor's conclusion, and any audit limits. Although it could be included
A formal letter of engagement between an auditor and a client outlining the terms and conditions of the audit engagement is known as an audit engagement letter. A explanation of the audit's scope, the roles of the auditor and management, the foundation for the matters generally and any audit constraints are often included in the letter. Depending on the individual audit engagement and the requirements of the applicable auditing standards or legislation, matters that matters generally auditor's engagement letter may change. The audit goals, the audit methodology, the audit duration, and the anticipated deliverables are just a few typical topics that may be included in the engagement letter.
Learn more about matters generally here:
https://brainly.com/question/11164679
#SPJ4
Scenario: You are an attorney on a criminal case. You have concerns about one of the witnesses who will be testifying during the trial. You are concerned that she has a history of failing to appear in court and of committing perjury (lying under oath) in the past.
Task: Create a professional email addressed to a colleague. This colleague is another attorney who will be trying the case with you. The email should explain your concerns about the witness in your upcoming trial. You may choose the details of the case/witness and the side that you represent. Be sure to follow the guidelines above for professional emails. 20 pts
Answers
Answer:
here you go did my best
Explanation:
Dear, Colleague
I am overall concerned with this Criminal, due to her not showing up to trial. She has committed perjury before she seems dangerous and I can't fight on anyone's behalf if she doesn't show I am concerned but I would greatly appreciate your comment on it.
Thank you, your Colleague
In the email, the attorney can send to the colleague by mentioning that the former is concerned with the Criminal, due to her not showing up to trial and she has committed perjury before and she seems dangerous. "I can't fight on anyone's behalf if she doesn't show I am concerned but I would greatly appreciate your comment on it."
Who is an attorney?An attorney may refer to a lawyer and a lawyer is a person who practices law. The role of a lawyer varies greatly across different legal jurisdictions. A lawyer can be classified as an advocate, attorney, barrister, canon lawyer, civil law notary, counsel, counsellor, solicitor, legal executive, or public servant with each role having different functions and privileges. Working as a lawyer generally involves the practical application of abstract legal theories and knowledge to solve specific problems.
Some lawyers also work primarily in advancing the interests of the law and legal profession
Learn more about attorney, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12270776
#SPJ2
According to Ms. Malloy, how often were false confessions or admissions present in wrongful convictions of people who were later exonerated by DNA evidence?
Answers
It's impossible to say how frequently false confessions occur. False confessions or admissions are known to be included in around 26% of unjust convictions of people who were late exonerated by DNA proof.
What is the meaning of DNA exoneration?This lesson sequence is based on a standard forensics lab, only instead of analyzing DNA evidence to discover who committed a crime, students investigate the innocence of someone who has been wrongly accused.
A person who has been convicted of a crime gets exonerated when new proof of innocence is presented.
For more information about DNA exoneration refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/9653528
#SPJ1
What is the exclusionary rule and how did it come to be? Given the advent of good-faith exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the plain-view doctrine, and the U.S. Supreme Court's recognition of the need for emergency searches, can we realistically argue that the exclusionary rule is still effective in contemporary American criminal justice? Has the exclusionary rule been so watered down by recent decisions as to be little more than a paper tiger? Defend your position.
Answers
Answer:
The exclusionary rule forbids most evidence obtained in violation of the Constitution of the United States from being used by the legislature. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio determined that evidence obtained from an arbitrary search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment is protected by the exclusionary clause.
Explanation:
mary, a citizen of alaska, has put up a web site about her use of over the counter drugs to lose weight. the web site merely posted information and has no interactive capbalities. sarah, a citizen of indiana, looks at the site on her computer in indiana and without contacting her doctor takes the same over the counter drugs and gets sick. she decides to sue mary. the proper jurisdiction for this case is:
Answers
The proper jurisdiction for this case is "Minimum contacts".
The defendant has engaged in at least a small but significant amount of activity that qualifies as "minimum contacts" in the state where the lawsuit was filed. The "minimum contacts" requirement generally means that a defendant must have a sufficient connection to the state in which a case has been filed for a judge to conclude that the state has the right to exercise power over the defendant. A judge is likely to conclude that "minimum contacts" exist if a company with its headquarters in another state sends mail order catalogs into the state where the suit is filed, does business with paid subscribers, or accepts online orders from customers in the state where the case is filed.
Learn more about "minimum contacts"-
https://brainly.com/question/10260455
#SPJ4
Of the proposed methods for responding to an unruly defendant in Illinois v. Allen, which did the Supreme Court state should be used as a last resort for fear of prejudicing the jury against the defendant?
Answers
Answer:
Gag and bind defendants
Explanation:
In the Illinois v. Allen case of 1970, the Supreme court upheld the gag or bind order which allows for the removal of an unruly defendant who interrupts court proceedings. In that particular case, Allen was tried for ordering a drink in a bar, refusing to pay, and collecting $200 at gunpoint from a bartender. When he was charged to court, Allen refused the public defender whom the court assigned to him, rather insisting that he would defend himself. He proved verbally abusive to the judge even issuing him a death threat when he tried convincing him of the need for a public defender who understands the language of the court. When the situation proved uncontrollable, the judge ordered that Allen be taken out of the court and only brought in when there was a need for him to be identified.
The Supreme court upheld this decision agreeing that any defendant whose actions proved disruptive to the court should be removed from the courtroom. Gag and shackles were one of the three methods proposed for controlling an unruly defendant and it was to be the last resort. The reason for this is that when the judges see the defendant in that condition it could play on their emotions, thus making them prejudiced.
Case 4.3, Taylor v. Baseball Club of Seattle, L.P., involved a Mariners fan, Delinda Middleton Taylor, who was injured by a baseball that entered the stands during team warm-ups. The issue in the case was a. whether the risk of injury from an errant baseball was foreseeable to a reasonable person with Taylor's familiarity with baseball. b. whether the ball was thrown into the stands intentionally. c. whether Taylor suffered a legally recognizable injury. d. false imprisonment.
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Taylor v Baseball club of seattle case was filed by Taylor against Baseball club of Seattle for being negligent. The baseball club in their defence argued that Taylor was quite familiar with the game and the fact that there is a chance that a ball can hit a spectator.
What major political events near the turn of the century contributed to the political polarization in current U.S. political discourse? How did events such as the impeachment of President Clinton and the election crisis of 2000 increase animosity between the political parties? Explain.
Answers
During the turn of the century, major political events contributed to the political polarization in current U.S. political discourse.
One of the significant events that led to an increase in animosity between political parties was the impeachment of President Clinton and the election crisis of 2000.The impeachment of President ClintonThe impeachment of President Clinton in 1998 marked one of the most significant political events in the United States. The impeachment had a lasting effect on the political discourse of the country.
The impeachment led to a massive division between the Democrats and Republicans.The Republicans, who controlled Congress, accused President Clinton of perjury and obstruction of justice in a lawsuit that alleged he had engaged in sexual harassment. The Democrats, on the other hand, were concerned that the impeachment process was politically motivated and constituted a threat to the presidency.
To know more about polarization visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3092611
#SPJ11
the three main issues that have shaped education policy in texas over the last 50 years have been
Answers
There have been several issues that have shaped education policy in Texas over the last 50 years, but three of the most significant are:
1. School funding: School funding has been a major issue in Texas for many years. In the 1970s, a series of lawsuits challenged the state's system of funding public education, which was heavily reliant on local property taxes.
These lawsuits resulted in a series of reforms, including the creation of a statewide property tax and a system of equalized funding. However, school funding remains a contentious issue, and there have been several more recent lawsuits challenging the adequacy and equity of school funding in Texas.
2. Standardized testing: Standardized testing has been a key part of education policy in Texas since the 1980s. In 1984, Texas implemented the Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS), which was later replaced by the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) and then the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR).
These tests have been controversial, with critics arguing that they are overemphasized and lead to teaching to the test, while supporters argue that they are necessary for accountability and ensuring that students are prepared for college and careers.
3. Bilingual education: Bilingual education has been a major issue in Texas, given the state's large population of English language learners. In 1968, Texas passed the Bilingual Education Act, which required that schools provide bilingual instruction to students who were not proficient in English.
However, in the 1990s, there was a push to transition English language learners into English-only instruction, and in 1995, Texas passed a law allowing schools to implement English-only instruction after a year of bilingual education.
To know more abouteducation refer here
https://brainly.com/question/18023991#
#SPJ11
Describe the major components of policing as a subculture
Identify the theoretical perspectives used to analyze the culture of policing
Describe how each of the theoretical perspectives is used to analyze the policing subculture
Answers
The major components of policing as a subculture include shared beliefs, values, norms, symbols, rituals, and language within the law enforcement profession. These components form a distinct social system that sets police officers apart from the broader society.
The subculture emphasizes loyalty, solidarity, and the pursuit of justice, while also promoting a sense of mistrust toward civilians and a strong emphasis on group cohesion and protection. Theoretical perspectives commonly used to analyze the culture of policing include functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism.
Functionalism views the policing subculture as a necessary and functional part of society, where police officers perform crucial roles in maintaining law and order. It emphasizes the importance of shared values and norms that help officers function effectively in their roles.
Conflict theory highlights the power dynamics and inequalities within the policing subculture, focusing on the hierarchical structure and the potential abuse of power by those in authority. It examines the ways in which the subculture reinforces social control and perpetuates inequalities.
Symbolic interactionism focuses on the meanings and symbols shared within the policing subculture. It explores how police officers interpret and construct their reality through interaction with each other and with civilians. It examines the language, gestures, and rituals that shape their identity and influence their behavior.
Learn more about rituals here:
https://brainly.com/question/26632952
#SPJ4
What is the legal position of persons without combatant status who nevertheless take an active part in hostilities? What are the legal consequences these individuals may face for their conduct?
Answers
The legal status of noncombatants who take an active part in hostilities is a complicated and contentious subject of international law.
People who directly engage in hostilities without being lawful fighters or having status as a combatant are sometimes referred to as "unprivileged belligerents" or "unlawful combatants" under international humanitarian law.
Individuals who engage in hostilities against the law may face prosecution by their state. Typically, these cases are predicated on crimes like terrorism, war crimes, or other criminal behaviors.
Learn more about hostilities, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30331571
#SPJ4
Having to do all the work is an example of a(n)
A. disadvantage to society of using authority
B. disadvantage to the user of using authority
C. advantage to society of using authority
D. advantage to the user of using authority
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
, Studio GFF hid your b ok gift but no you don't need to
important role of PDEA in LAW ENFORCEMENT.
Answers
Answer:
The PDEA is a regular law enforcement and regulatory agency which is responsible for the efficient and effective law enforcement of all provisions on any dangerous drug and/or controlled precursors and essential chemicals.
Explanation:
Black American men were granted suffrage before American women.
True
False
Answers
Answer:false
Explanation:
Black men were given voting rights in 1870, while black women were effectively banned until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
What type of enforcement do domestic laws use, such as laws in the united states that prohibit murder or theft?.
Answers
Vertical enforcement. Vertical enforcement is the application of domestic laws, such as those that forbid homicide or theft in the United States.
- More about vertical enforcement :
- In order to implement a particular policy, vertical policy enforcement refers to multi-level policies that integrate governance enforcement procedures vertically.
- Such a policy is enforced, for instance, during the enterprise planning and project approval procedures as well as the service design and service portfolio management processes.
- Examples of active vertical policies include preferential currency allocation that depends on export success, R&D funding, tax breaks for businesses entering new industries.
To know more about vertical enforcement, kindly click on the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/28943122?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
A Mutual fund in which no sales charge is paid by the individual investors called in
Answers
Answer:
That should be a "no- load" fund
Explanation:
A Mutual fund in which no sales charge is paid by the individual investors is called a no-load fund.
Which fund does not charge any type of sales load?
A no-load mutual fund means there will not be a sales charge when the investor buys the shares or when they sell their shares.
What is the sales charge on a mutual fund called?load
A sales charge is an additional fee paid by an investor that is used to compensate the broker or salesman for effecting that transaction. In mutual funds, the sales charge is typically called a 'load', which may be charged up-front, at the time of sale, or some other arrangement.
What are the 4 types of mutual funds?What types of mutual funds are there? Most mutual funds fall into one of four main categories – money market funds, bond funds, stock funds, and target-date funds. Each type has different features, risks, and rewards.
Learn more about Mutual funds at https://brainly.com/question/4521829
#SPJ2
A judge is trying to determine whether or not an accused person is a flight risk. Which of the following would help the judge make a more informed decision when setting bail?a. interviews with the accused's familyb. statistics about racial and ethnic characteristics and flight riskc. psychological evaluationd. software that analyzes online credit reports and social mediad. software that analyzes online credit reports and social media
Answers
The software that analyzes online credit reports and social media will help the judge make a more informed decision when setting bail if the accused person is a flight risk.
Bail refers to the release of an accused person from custody, which is generally done with a pledge or a promise of a sum of money. The court decides the sum of money that must be submitted for an individual's release.
If the accused person meets the court's conditions, the sum of money is returned to them.
Why is bail needed?Bail is a mechanism for securing the accused person's presence in court. The accused person promises to appear in court as a condition of their release in exchange for the opportunity to fight their charges outside of custody.
If they flee, the pledge or promise of money that they made to obtain their release will be forfeited.
This money is used to compensate the victim(s) of the crime, the state, or both.
How does software that analyzes online credit reports and social media help in this scenario?The software that analyzes online credit reports and social media will help the judge make a more informed decision when setting bail if the accused person is a flight risk.
Credit scores, social media posts, and other publicly available data are used by this software. The purpose is to determine whether or not the accused person is a flight risk.
To know more about Bail refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31110438#
#SPJ11
Please really need help on this please
Answers
why is black people be seen humanless in prison .
One paragraph
Answers
Racism and systemic biases contribute to the dehumanization of Black people in prison, perpetuating unjust treatment and stereotypes.
The perception of Black people being dehumanized in prison is rooted in systemic racism and biases that have persisted throughout history. It is important to recognize that these stereotypes are unjust and not based on inherent qualities or characteristics. The overrepresentation of Black individuals in the criminal justice system can be attributed to various factors, including socioeconomic disparities, racial profiling, and biased law enforcement practices. These systemic issues perpetuate a cycle of discrimination and unequal treatment. It is crucial to challenge and dismantle these biases through education, advocacy, and reforming the criminal justice system. Promoting equality, addressing socioeconomic disparities, and advocating for fair and unbiased treatment are essential steps towards combating dehumanization and ensuring justice for all individuals, regardless of their race or ethnicity.For more such questions on Black people:
https://brainly.com/question/31299587
#SPJ8
Plaintiff sued Defendant for illegal discrimination, claiming that Defendant fired him because of his race. At trial, Plaintiff called Witness, expecting him to testify that Defendant had admitted the racial motivation. Instead, Witness testified that Defendant said that he had fired Plaintiff because of his frequent absenteeism. While Witness is still on the stand, Plaintiff offers a properly authenticated secret tape recording he had made at a meeting with Witness in which Witness related Defendant's admissions of racial motivation.
The tape recording is:
(A) admissible as evidence of Defendant's racial motivation and to impeach Witness's testimony.
(B) admissible only to impeach Witness's testimony.
(C) inadmissible, because it is hearsay not within any exception.
(D) inadmissible, because a secret recording is an invasion of Witness's right of privacy under the U.S. Constitution.
Answers
The correct option of this question is: (B) admissible only to impeach Witness's testimony.
At trial, impeachment is the method involved with going after the exactness of witnesses' declaration. For instance, in the event that an observer's declaration at trial goes against their previous sworn statements, one or the two players could raise the sworn statement to denounce their declaration
A prior inconsistent statement by an observer, not committed after swearing to tell the truth, can be utilized to impugn that observer (just - it can't come in for its reality, as examined previously). The D>W statement is a confirmation by a party-rival, as examined above, so that is dealt with as a noise issue. The W>P statement stays noise, not expose to a special case, but rather since it was made by Witness, it can come in for impeachment purposes (as it were).
to know more about impeachment click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1373560
#SPJ4
What cases were important to freedom of speech?
Answers
Answer:
The U.S. Supreme Court has decided several cases involving the First Amendment rights of public school students, but the most often cited are Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986) and Hazelwood School District v.
Nationally, every state has enacted this Tim-related law, which is designed to protect incident responders at the roadside:
Answers
The Tim-related law that is designed to protect incident responders at the roadside, and has been enacted in every state, is Move Over Law.
What is the Move Over Law?
The Move Over Law requires that motorists change lanes or slow down if they are driving near a stopped emergency vehicle with its emergency lights activated. The law was established to safeguard emergency responders who are at risk of being hit by vehicles while working at the roadside.
In addition to emergency responders, the law often applies to other sorts of vehicles, such as sanitation, utility, and maintenance crews, among others. If drivers do not follow the Move Over Law, they risk receiving a ticket and, in some cases, having their license suspended.
In conclusion, the Move Over Law is designed to safeguard emergency responders and other personnel working on the roadside. The law requires motorists to change lanes or slow down when driving near stopped emergency vehicles with their emergency lights activated.
Learn more about the Move Over Law:
https://brainly.com/question/11470617
#SPJ11
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
Answers
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
Plzzz help Match the scenarios with the type of amendment they violate
Answers
Explain: they work like dat
2. Locate two examples of programs used to promote the community policing philosophy from two different police departments in
Indiana (one program from each department).
Answers
The artificial cell was created by a team of researchers led by Dr. Xiangyu Liu at the University of California, San Diego. The team used a combination of synthetic DNA, proteins, and lipids to build the cell from scratch, replicating the complex processes that occur in natural cells. The resulting cell is capable of self-replication, a key characteristic of living organisms.
The creation of an artificial cell has significant implications for a wide range of fields. One potential application is in the production of biofuels, with synthetic cells potentially being used to produce renewable energy sources. The technology could also have significant implications for medicine, with artificial cells potentially being used to create new treatments for a range of diseases. The development of synthetic cells could also help scientists better understand the fundamental processes that occur within living organisms, potentially leading to new insights into the origins of life itself.
PS I love you. And i asked the Ask AI app to write this for me. Get it for free --> https://get-askai.app
Locate a 1998 Alabama criminal case where the defendant, Clark, appealed his criminal conviction claiming that there was not sufficient evidence to support the conviction and his probation was improperly revoked.
Answers
In 1998, there was a criminal case in Alabama that involved Clark, the defendant who was convicted of a crime and claimed that there was not enough evidence to support the conviction.
Clark also argued that his probation was improperly revoked. The case was eventually appealed, and the appeal revolved around the issues raised by Clark. The Court of Appeals heard the case and made a determination on whether or not the conviction and revocation of probation were justified in this case.The Court found that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that the probation was properly revoked.
The evidence presented at trial, including the testimony of witnesses, was enough to establish the elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Additionally, the probation was revoked after Clark violated the terms of his probation, so the revocation was appropriate. The Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's decision, and Clark's conviction and probation revocation were upheld as well. In conclusion, Clark's appeal was denied, and his criminal conviction was upheld, as was the revocation of his probation.
To know more about Probation visit-
brainly.com/question/3344075
#SPJ11