Uneven compensation, unequal promotions, instances of sexual misconduct, and racism are just a few of the ways that gender inequality as in workplace manifests itself.
What function does a workplace serve?Consequently, a workplace provides a setting for an employee to carry out a specific activity. It is regarded as the setting in which employees operate and includes the physical location, the nature of the work, the company culture, and the immediate surroundings.
Why is a pleasant workplace crucial?Workplace culture has a big impact on how an individual thinks and develops. A positive workplace culture may inspire employees to continuously create high-quality work. Finding out what makes a productive workplace will help you increase collaboration and increase productivity.
To learn more about workplace visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4675352
#SPJ4
Select the best answer for the question.
8. Courts and legislatures have approved exceptions to the opinion evidence rule. These rules of exception
O A. have developed along two lines: one set of rules for experts and one set of rules for non-experts.
O B. are applied to expert witnesses but not to non-expert witnesses.
O C. are the same for expert and non-expert witnesses.
O D. are so few that they have little influence on evidence.
Courts and legislatures have approved exceptions to the opinion evidence rule. These rules of exception have developed along two lines: one set of rules for experts and one set of rules for non-experts. (Option A).
What is Opinion Evidence?Opinion evidence is a type of evidence where a witness is allowed to express their opinion on a matter that is relevant to the case being heard in court. In general, witnesses are expected to testify about their observations and experiences related to the case, rather than offering their personal opinions or beliefs.
However, in some cases, opinion evidence may be permitted if the witness has specialized knowledge or expertise that can help the court understand complex or technical issues related to the case. For example, expert witnesses, such as doctors or forensic scientists, may be allowed to provide their professional opinions on medical or scientific matters relevant to the case.
Learn more about opinion evidence here: https://brainly.com/question/20840904
#SPJ1
Please explain in detail how social psychology can play an important role in courts of Pakistan?
Answer:
Your knowledge of yourself and the world around you will be enriched by learning more about social psychology. You will develop a better understanding of how social relationships affect the functioning of individuals by learning more about how people perceive others, how they participate in communities, and how behaviors are shaped.
3. Political Speech. Who determines what constitutes political speech? What separates advocating
illegal drug use (prohibited) from advocating a change in the law to legalize illegal drug use
(permitted)? Does the school have an "important," if not "compelling" interest in combating the use of
illegal drugs. If so, should this interest override First Amendment concerns?
Frederick's speech was "nonsensical." What type
Courts, which interpret the First Amendment of the US Constitution and its safeguards for free speech, determine what constitutes political speech in the main.
Which ruling applied in Morse v. Frederick?The U.S. Supreme Court concluded in a 5-4 ruling that school administrators are not prohibited from limiting student expression that is logically interpreted as endorsing the use of because of the First Amendment.
What kinds of expression are exempt from the First Amendment's protection?Obscenity, defamation, fraud, provocation, fighting language, genuine threats, communication vital to criminal conduct, and child are among the categories that the Court frequently defines.
To know more about Constitution visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/31129751
#SPJ9
(There is a photo of a door with blood splatter)
What are 4 pieces of evidence that can be tested at the scene? also please include what departments they can be tested in and how plz!!
Answer: The blood, the door handle, paint, fingerprints,hair,footprints,dust, and if there is a body then they uslly study the body. They can be tested in the CSI and law inforcment, they are tested by the doctors add chemicals and they study it. they study the blood and test how l how long the blood has been there. and by using a magnifyer to see if they missed anything in the blood like dust or dirt or food they study that
Explanation:
......is/are generally beyond the responsibility of local government.
a. schools
b. elections
c. utilities
d. law enforcement
Answer:
The answer is law enforcement
Law enforcement are generally beyond the responsibility of local government.
What is law enforcement?Law enforcement are government agency or body that enforce law.
These people act in a well organized way to make sure that rules and regulations are abided to.
Local government responsibility is not to manage or enforce law.
Therefore, Law enforcement are generally beyond the responsibility of local government.
Learn more on Law enforcement here,
https://brainly.com/question/7284226
the ______ was a silent system in which inmates engaged in congregate labor systems.
Inmates participated in collective labor schemes under the New York system, which was silent.
What is meant by the labor system?Labor systems are the simplest kind of cooperation between employers and employees. In the modern world, you may anticipate working under a contract that outlines your precise responsibilities and compensation.The Encomienda System, Repartimiento de Labor, and Hacienda System were three types of labor regimes that helped the economy of the early Spanish colonial Latin American nations flourish. Indentured servants were the first standard for forced labor in New England and middle colonies like Pennsylvania and Delaware as a carryover from English practice. These "indentured servants" were debt-paying individuals who voluntarily agreed to work for four to seven years at slave-level wages.To learn more about labor system, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/4712803
in a series of rulings dealing with the establishment clause, which has the supreme court clearly established?
The Supreme Court has clearly established that the government must remain neutral towards religion in a series of rulings dealing with the establishment clause. The First Amendment's Establishment Clause states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
This clause ensures that the government cannot endorse or prefer one religion over another. The Supreme Court has been responsible for interpreting the Establishment Clause since its inception.
The Court has issued a series of rulings in which it has established that the government must remain neutral towards religion. The Court has also established that the Establishment Clause applies not only to the federal government but also to the states.
The Establishment Clause is a provision of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution that prohibits the establishment of a national religion by Congress and prohibits the government from preferring one religion over another.
The Supreme Court has been responsible for interpreting the Establishment Clause since its inception.
To know more about establishment clause, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29498881#
#SPJ11
Your client, who is ninety-five years old, first contacted you in 2009 to complete her Last Will and Testament, which you did. However, she started to contact you regularly in 2011 in the middle of dementia saying that she wanted to leave everything to her mother. Now, she has insisted on completing a new will leaving everything to her mother, and you proceed with it to make your client happy, but also because you know that this final version of the will is not valid under the defense to formation of duress. True False
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Cohesion is the term that justifies the invalidation of an act, because that act has or was performed on illegal grounds. A testament cannot be an invalid claiming coercion, even if the person who issued it has dementia or another problem that impedes their abilities.
A testament represents an individual's last will and shows what he wants to happen after his death. The will is a legal document and valid in any situation.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Before parliamentary acts were passed to regulate working, how many hours per day did most children work?.
Before the given parliamentary acts were passed in order to the regulate working, then children are not allowed to work for more than 12 hours in a day.
By 1833, any Government exceeded what become to be the primary of many acts handling running situations and hours. At first, there has been restricted energy to implement those acts however because the century advanced the guidelines have been enforced extra strictly.
Nonetheless, the hours and running situations have been nevertheless very difficult with the aid of using today’s standards, and no guidelines have been in region to defend person male workers. Working in the road jobs protected shining shoes, promoting newspapers, canning fish, making garments and weaving fabrics. With the understanding that youngsters labored in factories, mines, and different jobs we could speak approximately their wages and hours. A regular day for those abused youngsters become everywhere from 12 to 19 hours a day.
Learn more about parliamentary visit: brainly.com/question/1504316
#SPJ4
16.
The Founding Fathers built into the Constitution the principle of
to make sure that no one branch of the federal government
gained too much power over the other two.
A. separation of powers
B. checks and balances
C. inherent rights of individuals
D. states rights
E government by the people
Answer:
system of checks and balances
The system of checks and balances in government was developed to ensure that no one branch of government would become too powerful.
________ occurs when the president directs administrative agencies to promulgate specific rules and regulations.
Policy implementation occurs when the president directs administrative agencies to promulgate specific rules and regulations. This process involves the translation of policies into actionable guidelines, ensuring that the government's objectives are effectively carried out by the responsible agencies.
Presidential directive is the term used when the president directs administrative agencies to promulgate specific rules and regulations. These directives are usually issued when the president believes that a particular issue needs to be addressed immediately and cannot wait for the normal rulemaking process. Administrative agencies are responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws passed by Congress. They have the authority to promulgate specific rules and regulations that govern the implementation of those laws. The regulations are intended to clarify the intent of the law and to provide guidance to the regulated community. This often imposed on these directives to ensure that they are concise and focused on the specific issue at hand.
To know more about administrative agencies visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28274991
#SPJ11
What are the powers of Congress, described in Article I of the U.S.
Constitution?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; ArtI. S8.
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
True or False? (try your best to answer all please, but you don't have to at least most of them lol)
1.) Children born in the US to foreign-born parents can never be US citizens
2.) Naturalized citizens may run for the office of president.
3.) Immigration laws give preference to certain groups of people.
4.) Many Africans were brought to the Americas as slaves.
5.) Under the US form of government, the people govern themselves through the officials they elect.
6.) Aliens, or people in the US, who are citizens of another country, cannot vote or hold public office.
7.) If your parents are US citizens, you are a US citizen, regardless of where you were born.
8.) Undocumented workers often are paid much more than the minimum wage.
9.) If you are born in any US state or territory, you automatically become a citizen by blood.
Answer:
1. False
4. True
5. True
Explanation:
This is all I know :)
Where does the controversy lie with military movement?
A. Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution declares president as commander - in - chief of the armed forces but Article 2, Section 1 gives Congress the power to declare war.
B. Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution declares the president as commander - in - chief of the armed forces but Article 1, Section 8 gives Congress the power to declare war.
C. There is no controversy because the president is commander - in - chief.
D. There is no controversy because Congress declares war.
what job or political office does chuck schumer now hold?
Chuck Schumer is the current Senate Majority Leader of the United States Senate. He is a member of the Democratic Party and has held this office since 2017.
Chuck Schumer is the highest ranking Democrat in the Senate and is responsible for leading his party on the floor and in negotiations with the other party. He is also responsible for setting the legislative agenda for the Senate and for working with the President on legislation.
Outside of the Senate, Schumer is a prominent figure in the Democratic Party. He is the Chair of the Senate Democratic Policy and Communications Committee and is frequently consulted for his opinion on political matters. Schumer has also been a strong advocate for progressive causes, such as fighting for LGBTQ rights, defending the environment, and promoting economic justice.
To learn more about Democratic Party link is here:
brainly.com/question/1204107
#SPJ4
Are indigent criminal defendants in Luzerne County receiving their constitutionally protected right to counsel?
The states Luzerne and localities use a variety of strategies, including public defender programs, assigned counsel, and contract attorney systems, to the provide indigent defense services.
If it is determined that you lack the financial means to hire an attorney, a public defense will be assigned on your behalf. For contempt, Luzerne, and revocation cases, eligibility is taken as given. If you appear to have the financial means to hire your own attorney, the public defender may decline to represent you. The indigent defendants frequently have to spend a lot of time waiting in the jail before speaking with a lawyer.
To learn more about defense, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/12252825
#SPJ1
URGENT 40 POINTS
The Sixth Amendment guarantees individuals the right to a trial that is public, speedy, and held in the jurisdiction where the alleged crime took place. Recently, a woman was arrested on suspicion of shoplifting from a local gas station. Her trial is set for two weeks from today. Instead of waiting for trial, the suspect is thinking of taking a plea bargain. What does this mean?
A.
She will ask for her trial to be moved up a week.
B.
She will ask that her trial be held somewhere else.
C.
She will ask that her trial be held in private.
D.
She will admit guilt in exchange for a lesser sentence.
Answer:
I believe it is D
Explanation:
a plea bargain is "an agreement between a defendant and a prosecutor, in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty or "no contest" (nolo contendere) in exchange for an agreement by the prosecutor to drop one or more charges, reduce a charge to a less serious offense, or recommend to the judge a specific sentence ..."
If you need to slow down while driving on a slippery road the first thing you should do is:
If you need to slow down while driving on a slippery road, the first thing you should do is to reduce your speed gradually.
To reduce your speed gradually, you should take your foot off the gas pedal and use the brakes lightly and smoothly. If your vehicle has anti-lock brakes, apply firm and continuous pressure to the brake pedal, but if it doesn't, pump the brakes gently. This will help you maintain traction on the road and prevent skidding.
Another important thing to do when driving on slippery roads is to increase the distance between your vehicle and the vehicle in front of you. This will give you more time to react and stop in case of an emergency.
In addition, you should avoid sudden movements, such as sharp turns or lane changes, as this can also cause your vehicle to skid. Instead, use smooth and gradual movements when steering, accelerating or braking.
Overall, driving on slippery roads requires caution, patience and skill. By reducing your speed gradually, increasing your distance from other vehicles, and avoiding sudden movements, you can stay safe and avoid accidents.
For more such questions on driving visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29529618
#SPJ11
civil law deals with relationships between individuals and government.
Civil law refers to the legal system governing the relationship between individuals, and the government is referred to as public law.
Civil law deals with disputes between two or more people, such as contracts, property, and family law matters. It may also be referred to as private law because it is concerned with private matters rather than public ones.Generally, civil law courts have jurisdiction over cases involving private parties. Civil law cases can be divided into three major categories: Contract law, Property law, and Family law. In contract law, civil law deals with agreements between individuals.
In property law, civil law governs the ownership of personal and real property. In family law, civil law governs issues such as marriage, divorce, child custody, adoption, and inheritance.Civil law is designed to protect the rights of individuals, whereas public law is designed to protect the interests of society as a whole. While both types of law are necessary to maintain order and justice in society, the distinction between them is important to understand when dealing with legal matters.
To know more about Civil law:
https://brainly.com/question/31952089
#SPJ11
what common practice was professor oberer critical in his 1961 university of texas law review article?
John Dickinson, a delegate from Delaware, was once the predominant writer. The Dickinson Draft of the Articles of Confederation named the confederation "the United States of America."
After large debate and revision, the Second Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777.
What did the Articles of Confederation now not give?Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress lacked the authority to regulate commerce, making it unable to defend or standardize trade between overseas international locations and the various states.
Learn more about critical in his 1961 university here;
https://brainly.com/question/2873636
#SPJ4
In his 1961 University of Texas Law Review article, Professor Oberer was highly critical of the common practice of judicial review. Judicial review is the power of a court to review and invalidate laws if they are deemed to be unconstitutional.
According to Professor Oberer, this practice was not consistent with the original intent of the founders of the United States and the text of the Constitution. He argued that the Constitution itself does not give the judiciary this power, and that it should not be used to override the will of the people and their representatives in Congress.
He suggested that the power of judicial review should be used sparingly and only when a law is found to be in direct violation of the Constitution.
know more about Texas here
https://brainly.com/question/12153172#
#SPJ11
In what year was the importation of enslaved persons banned in the united states?.
What type of intent is necessary to violate the provisions of the Deadly Weapons Control Law? Are there exceptions? Under what conditions is the possession of a dirk or dagger a crime under the provisions of PC 12020?
Answer:
Are you just trying to get free points?
Explanation:
The government __________ is the difference produced when spending exceeds revenues in a fiscal year while the government __________ is the total amount of money borrowed over the years that is not yet repaid.
Group of answer choices
surplus; sequestration
sequestration; surplus
debt; deficit
deficit; debt
Answer:
debt is the answer to everything related to college payment
Explanation:
What is original and appellate jurisdiction?
The ability of a court to hear a case for the first time is known as original jurisdiction. It can be contrasted with appellate jurisdiction, which is a court's ability to consider a case that a lower court has previously heard and determined.
What are the major differences between original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction?
The major differences between original and appellate jurisdiction are as follows:
1) Original jurisdiction refers to a court's power to decide a case based on a trial and evidence rather than an appeal. The ability of a court to hear an appeal from a lower court is known as appellate jurisdiction.
2) The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over cases involving constitutional interpretation, disputes between states, and disputes between the central government and a state, however, even lower courts have original authority over civil and criminal matters.
3) The majority of cases that the Supreme Court hears are those that come under its appellate authority.
The ability of a court to hear a case for the first time is known as original jurisdiction. It can be contrasted with appellate jurisdiction, which is a court's ability to consider a case that a lower court has previously heard and determined.
To find out more about original and appellate jurisdiction, check out:
https://brainly.com/question/11744340
#SPJ4
Which of the following answers is NOT an argument used by supporters of the death penalty?
The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment.”
The death penalty supports the religious and social values of our country.
The death penalty acts as a deterrent for those who contemplate committing serious crimes.
The death penalty is “morally correct.”
The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment." is not an argument used by death penalty supporters.
What is an Argument?An argument refers to exchange of views or series of statements or words which are use in order to determine the degree of truth of another statement, conclusion or views.
It is normally a diverging statements.
Therefore, The death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment." is not an argument used by death penalty supporters because it does not support their views and interest.
Learn more about Argument from the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/509558
Describe at least 3 powers that are reserved for the National government. Describe at least 3 powers reserved for State governments. Describe at least 3 powers shared between the National and State governments. Who do you think has more power, the national or state governments, and why?
Answer:
national powers: coining money, making laws, explaining laws
state powers: minimum wage, opening schools, establishing businesses
national probably has more power because they can make and establish laws, plus they are the ones who gave the states the power
Explanation:
What is used to make a cast of a tool mark?
A) Resin
B) Silicone rubber
C) Plaster of Paris
D) All of the above
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
Why did people protesting the stay-at-home order cite the 2nd amendment? Isn't that the right to bear arms?
Answer:
the 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms.
Explanation:
they might have cited the right to bear arms because when the government is seen as out of control the people can take over. so I'm guessing that because they see the stay at home order as unfair they want to protest and have guns. but I'm not 100% sure this is right. I just hope this helps