What are the three grounds for appeal?

Answer:

D

Explanation:

because all is drivers and drivers not use 90 above hour

only 60-70 hour lang

and this is carrier

make me brainless tyy hope it helps

All of the above can use the 60 or 70-hour limit. The driver cannot run a vehicle after spending 70 hours on the job during any eight-day period if the motor carrier operates every day of the week. Thus, option D is correct.

The driver cannot operate a vehicle after they have clocked 60 hours of on-duty time during any seven-day period if the motor carrier operates on fewer than every day of the week. The motor carrier must have commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in operation every day of the week in order to employ the 70-hour/8-day norm.

The 70-hour/8-day rule is a discretionary clause in that a motor carrier that has vehicles operating every day of the week is not obligated to utilize the rule to determine the hours of service for its drivers.

Therefore, option D is the ideal selection.

Learn more about Driver's Rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/31847567

#SPJ4

Answer: In the post 9/11 environment society has been consumed by the question of whether torture is acceptable under extreme circumstances. The “ticking bomb” metaphor was regularly employed by various figures in the US as an argument to justify the use of torture in interrogations during the term of the Bush Administration. It is an argument that has been used to justify torture in a set of very extreme and detailed circumstances. This paper will argue that the “ticking bomb” metaphor does not provide a convincing argument to justify the use of torture under extreme circumstances. First, definitions of torture and the “ticking bomb” metaphor will be provided. Second, this essay will discuss the use of torture by the US in the War on Terror. Third, the arguments for the use of torture under extreme circumstances, and the flaws of allowing torture under extreme circumstances will be addressed.

Explanation:

any act by which severe pain  suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence  of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity (United Nations 1997).

Torture is prohibited in any circumstance under a variety of international laws, conventions, and norms. It is spelt out in not only the UN Convention against Torture, but also the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the law of armed conflicts, and the Geneva Conventions (Ip 2009: 36). The prohibition of torture is further enshrined in domestic laws of many of the countries who have ratified these treaties. However, the “ticking bomb” metaphor is used to justify torture in certain extreme situations. The concept of the “ticking bomb” was first conceptualised in a fiction novel written by Jean Larteguy in 1960 (Kovarovic 2010: 254). It describes a scenario whereby the torture of a suspect is considered necessary to obtain information to prevent a future catastrophic event from occurring (Kovarovic 2010: 254). The scenario is usually described as one where terrorists have planned an attack that is going to occur very soon and  a large number of people will be killed unless the authorities obtain critical information from the source they have captured (Ip 2009: 40). It is essentially torture that has been sanctioned by the state in exceptional circumstances (Bufacchi and Arrigo 2006: 354). Torture is still considered to be wrong in these circumstances, but it is viewed as a necessary or lesser evil (Ip 2009: 40). Proponents of the “ticking bomb” scenario argue that “torture may be wrong…but mass murder is worse, so the lesser evil must be tolerated to prevent the greater one” (Roth 2005: 197).

An executive order differs from a federal law in several ways. An executive order is issued by the President of the United States and is meant to direct and guide the actions of the executive branch of the government. Executive orders are not laws and do not require the approval of Congress.

The president may use an executive order to implement policy changes, to provide guidance to federal agencies, or to take action on a particular issue.Executive orders are more like directives, which aim to set policy or direct action, while laws are formal, written rules that have been passed by Congress and signed by the president. Laws are more powerful than executive orders because they have the force of law behind them. They are also subject to judicial review and can be overturned if they are found to be unconstitutional.Executive orders are also temporary. Once a president leaves office, his or her executive orders are no longer in effect, unless they have been codified into law by Congress.

Federal laws, on the other hand, are permanent, and they can only be changed or repealed by Congress.Executive orders can be challenged in court, but the process is different from the process used to challenge a federal law. While a federal law can be challenged in any court, an executive order can only be challenged in the court that has jurisdiction over the issue in question. Overall, the main differences between an executive order and a federal law are their source of authority, their permanence, and their enforceability.

To know more about executive visit :

https://brainly.com/question/11422252

#SPJ11

The federal judiciary is the judicial branch of the federal government. It comprises of the Supreme Court and the lesser federal courts that Congress established. The Supreme Court and the High Court are the only courts with the authority to decide on rights under the federal legal system.

An organized community is regulated by a structure or a collection of people, frequently a state. In the case of its broad associative definition, government typically comprises of the legislative, executive, and judicial departments. Government serves as both a mechanism for formulating and enforcing organizational policy. In many countries, a statement outlining the principles and philosophy of the government serves as the equivalent of a constitution.

Even though all entities have governance, the word "government" is commonly used to more specifically refer to the approximately 200 distinct national governments and related institutions. Between these two fundamental subcategories of contemporary political systems are democracies, totalitarian regimes, and authoritarian regimes with a variety of hybrid regimes.

Learn more about government here:

brainly.com/question/4160287

#SPJ4

Answer:

FOr the first one tracy should be given a fine for everyones phone that she broke.

Explanation:

Answer:

backspace

Explanation:

delete

Answer:

When u wanna delete something

Explanation:

Have a Nice Day

In an oligopoly, the market is shared among a few firms. Competition is limited in an oligopoly for various reasons, which are explained below:

Interdependence: In an oligopoly, firms are interdependent on each other. Every firm's decision will affect the other firms' profits and market share. Therefore, firms have to consider their rival's responses before taking any action. Firms are not in a position to decide on the price of the product because the price is linked to the output of the industry.

Pricing strategies: Firms in an oligopoly focus on non-price competition, like product differentiation, branding, and advertising. Firms in an oligopoly tend to differentiate their products to create brand loyalty. This type of competition requires a significant amount of capital, which makes it hard for new entrants.

Barriers to entry: Firms in an oligopoly use several barriers to prevent new firms from entering the market. High capital costs, government regulations, and patents are some of the entry barriers used in oligopolistic markets.

Non-Price Competition: Firms in an oligopoly are not allowed to compete based on prices. Firms need to use different types of non-price competition to compete effectively. Product differentiation, research and development, advertising, and branding are some of the strategies used in an oligopoly to differentiate the products from their competitors'.Thus, competition is limited in an oligopoly because of the interdependence between the firms, non-price competition, entry barriers, and pricing strategies.

Know more about oligopoly here:

https://brainly.com/question/29518761

#SPJ8

Answer:

Explanation:

It was about the right of a parent to with hold immunization from a child for religious reasons. The immunizations would have protected the child from diseases described by health officials (I think in the state of MIssissippi).

The religious right appeal goes right back to the First Amendment which guarantees religious freedom. The court found that when a child endangers himself or others by not being protected from deadly diseases, the First Amendment's protection does not apply.  

Answer:

In my opinion I think so because what happened to our rights and people that don't obey the law should be the one's to pay for it not us.

hope this helps

have a good day :)

Explanation:

Answer:

It’s probably

Explanation:

C

Answer: the answer is B: a designer hat hasn't been paid for her work

Explanation:

because

A: is vandalism

C: is assault or battery

D: is scamming or credit card fraud

so B is the answer

thank you for your time.      

ghost out

Answer:

true  cuz I said

Explanation:

Answer and Explanation:

Jusnaturalist School: According to this school, a law must, above all, directly address the promotion of justice in any type of situation, respecting the maximum natural right of the individual, which is an inalienable right that must be respected at any cost. . Based on this school, the situation shown in the question above is inadmissible, as it does not promote justice, it prevents innocent people from traveling via respecting their religion and still hurts their natural right.

Teleological School: This school has a strong political character and states that a law that achieves a social balance and promotes and is the service of protection and promotion of policies that protect society, it is valid. In relation to the case shown in the question above, this school can claim that the law is correct, since there have already been many cases of terrorism caused by Muslims, making their ban on boarding a promotion of social security.

2. When analyzing these two schools of legal thought in relation to the case shown in the question above, I came to the conclusion that the Jusnaturalist school is the one I most agree with. This is because prohibiting Muslim women from boarding an airplane because of terorist cases that they were not part of is a strong example of religious prejudice and intolerance, in addition to hurting the rights of innocent women.

Answer:

The father of the Uhuru Kenyatta was Jomo Kenyatta.

Explanation:

Answer:

B. Asking a series of indirect questions.

Explanation:

The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through asking a series of indirect questions.

Option A refers to a technique called deception, where incorrect facts are stated to observe the subject's reaction. Option C refers to building rapport, which can help to establish trust and encourage the subject to share information voluntarily. Option D refers to the use of intimidation or coercion, which is not a recommended or ethical method for obtaining information.

Answer:

It can be alcohol abuse or alcoholism.

Answer:

definitaly thought process but serching process to

Explanation:

Parking and passing require coordination of many different driving skills combined with a continuous searching process.

While driving a vehicle on the road, it is important to be alert and be cautious. There are certain traffic rules to be followed while driving.

Parking one's car and passing over another car requires skills and rules to follow.

One requires coordination of driving skills along with continuous searching process for parking and passing a vehicle.

There are several types of parking maneuvers :

Passing a vehicle requires a good judgement.

Learn more about "driving" here :

https://brainly.com/question/21945861

The aggressive act that is classified as a reactive act is "hitting someone in response to being hit first." It is important to seek non-violent and peaceful solutions to conflicts.

Reactive aggressive acts are classified as those aggressive acts that are responses to aggressive behaviors from others. Hitting someone in response to being hit first would be classified as a reactive aggressive act.

Types of aggressive behaviors include proactive aggression and reactive aggression. Proactive aggression is where a person initiates an aggressive behavior, whereas reactive aggression is where a person responds aggressively to an aggressive behavior from another individual.

To summarize, reactive aggression involves responding aggressively to an aggressive act directed towards you, while proactive aggression involves initiating aggressive behavior without immediate provocation. Both types of aggression can have negative consequences and are generally not considered desirable or constructive ways of resolving conflicts. It is important to seek non-violent and peaceful alternatives whenever possible.

You can learn more about reactive act at: https://brainly.com/question/30843855

#SPJ11

Answer: B is the correct answer

The occurrence of the PIO's proactive approach to public information enhances credibility in messaging when there is downtime when working an emergency. Hence, Option C is correct.

When actions are taken by the person for any problem or difficulty before its turns into a big issue or problem is known as the proactive approach. In nsimpleterms, an approach is made by becoming an active solver in advance. There is one more way to solve any problem and that is the reactive approach. As per the name, it can be stated that the problem or the difficulty will be solved only when it is moved to the next level.

In the case of the reactive approach, the problem is solved when there is a lot of work pressure and a load of other problem-solving is also there. For instance, when a student prepares for the exams that are going to be held in the month of June, preparation will be started by the student in January.

Thus, Option C is correct.

Learn more about proactive approach from here:

https://brainly.com/question/14419326

#SPJ5

Explanation:

features of federalism are

1 there are two or more level of government

2different tires of government the same citizen but each tier has its own jurisdiction specific matter of Legislature and taxation and administration

3 the level of jurisdiction of the respective level of or two tires of government are specified in the constitution so that existence and authority of each tier of government is constitutionally granted

4 the fundamental provisions of the Constitution cannot be an literally changed by one level of the government such changes required the contest of both level of government

5 sources of revenue for each level of government clearly specialised to ensure its financial authority

I hope it will help you

please mark answer as a brainliest answer

thank you

The Tim-related law that is designed to protect incident responders at the roadside, and has been enacted in every state, is Move Over Law.

What is the Move Over Law?

The Move Over Law requires that motorists change lanes or slow down if they are driving near a stopped emergency vehicle with its emergency lights activated. The law was established to safeguard emergency responders who are at risk of being hit by vehicles while working at the roadside.

In addition to emergency responders, the law often applies to other sorts of vehicles, such as sanitation, utility, and maintenance crews, among others. If drivers do not follow the Move Over Law, they risk receiving a ticket and, in some cases, having their license suspended.

In conclusion, the Move Over Law is designed to safeguard emergency responders and other personnel working on the roadside. The law requires motorists to change lanes or slow down when driving near stopped emergency vehicles with their emergency lights activated.

Learn more about the Move Over Law:

https://brainly.com/question/11470617

#SPJ11

The major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases. are

Generally, A judge is an individual who presides over the proceedings that take place in a court of law, either on their own or as a member of a panel of judges.

The judge will listen to all of the witnesses as well as any additional evidence that may be provided by the prosecution or the defense. On the basis of the evidence that has been provided as well as in compliance with the law, the judge will make a determination as to whether or not the accused individual is guilty. In the event that the accused is found guilty, the court will subsequently impose the appropriate penalty.

Read more about judge

https://brainly.com/question/1059156

#SPJ1

Answer:

28 percent

Explanation:

Accidents are caused by a variety of factors such as overspeeding, lack of concentration and mechanical faults. Alcohol impairs the driver in ways such as low concentration and blurry vision.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately twenty eight percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016. This was discovered by several blood alcohol concentration tests done on the drivers.

Federalism is a term for a system with two or more governments exercising power over the same people and the same territory.

Federalism is a form of government wherein the two levels of authority share control over the same region. Larger territorial areas are typically governed more broadly by an overarching national government, while local concerns are handled by smaller divisions, states, and cities.

The central government and the local political entities both have the authority to enact laws and enjoy some degree of independence from one another. The Constitution of the United States created a system of "dual sovereignty," whereby the States preserved some sovereignty while ceding many of their authority to the Federal Government. There are some examples of this dual sovereignty listed in the U.S. Constitution.

To know more about Federalism:

brainly.com/question/8305583

#SPJ4

Answer:

selective service act

Explanation:

congress passed the selective service act into law wich required men in the U.S. between ages 21 and 30 to register for military service.

Considering the situation described above, Kaelyn's child and dependent care credit in 2021 if her AGI for the year was $130,000 is "$16,000."

This is because according to the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, individuals can claim the child and dependent care credit of $16,000 of expenses for two or more qualifying people.

Given that the qualifying people here are four-year-old twins, this makes it two or more qualifying people.

Though Kaelyn's Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) is $130,000, the rule of using 50% - 20% of expenses to claim the child and dependent care credit will come into play if the eventual credit will be more than $16,000.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is $16,000.

Learn more about the child and dependent care credit here: https://brainly.com/question/14441741

Answer:

Kaelyn's child and dependent care credit is $1200 if you use year of 2022 applicable percentage.

Explanation:

My opinion is that the amount won't be so high like first answer, so I write down what I think here.  

I didn't get the percentage about 2021, but I think the number is near, so I use 2022 percentages for reference. Next person may get one ask for 2022.

In 2022, the maximum child and dependent care credit is $3,000 for one qualifying person, so twins will get $6000. The applicable percentage is 20% of the AGI over 43,000, so it is $6,000 x 20%=1200.

The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against Microsoft in 1998, claiming it was engaging in unfair practices by using its monopoly power in the PC operating systems market to maintain its dominance and eliminate competition, specifically Netscape Communications Corporation.

Microsoft was bundling its web browser, Internet Explorer, with its Windows operating system, making it the default browser for most users and hindering competition from Netscape Navigator, which was still the dominant browser at the time.The lawsuit argued that Microsoft's practices harmed competition and innovation, and that it was violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Department of Justice sought to break up the company into smaller pieces, but a settlement was eventually reached in which Microsoft agreed to stop bundling Internet Explorer with Windows and to allow other companies to design software that could be integrated with the operating system.

The lawsuit and its settlement had a significant impact on the technology industry and set a precedent for antitrust enforcement in the United States.

To know more about Monopoly power visit-

brainly.com/question/29870936

#SPJ11

Wet floors, heavy lifting, and the potential for falling, sprains, and strains are all examples of physical hazards in the workplace.

Physical hazards are conditions or situations that can cause bodily harm, injury, or damage to one's health.

These hazards can result from various factors, such as slippery surfaces, improper lifting techniques, or insufficient safety measures.

Wet floors, for instance, can lead to slipping and falling incidents, which can cause injuries ranging from minor bruises to more severe fractures or concussions.

Heavy lifting, on the other hand, can lead to sprains and strains if workers do not utilize proper lifting techniques or equipment. These musculoskeletal injuries can be painful, debilitating, and may require extensive recovery periods.

To minimize the risk of physical hazards, employers should implement safety measures such as regular floor maintenance to prevent wet or slippery surfaces, providing training on proper lifting techniques, and ensuring the use of appropriate safety equipment.

Employees should also be encouraged to report any unsafe conditions or practices to management, so that preventative measures can be taken.

In conclusion, wet floors and heavy lifting are examples of physical hazards in the workplace, which can lead to falling, sprains, and strains.

It is essential to address these hazards through appropriate safety measures to protect the well-being of employees.

For more questions on: health

https://brainly.com/question/31169138

#SPJ11