Answers
Based on the concept of law and prosecutions, practical reasons determine whether the prosecutor files charges against an individual who has been arrested for a crime or whether the prosecutor engages in plea bargaining with the defendant.
What is the Practical Reason in Law?Practical Reason in Law is a term that is used to describe the practical actions and alternatives the prosecutors may employ to win a case for his client or defendant in the sense that it's a natural conclusion rather than the state of knowledge.
Usually, the practical reasons can come in various context and situations, depending on how the prosecutor analyzes the case and conclude the expected outcome and whether it would be favorable or not.
Some of the practical reasons in law are:The opportunity for defendants to avoid the time and cost of defending themselves at trialThe increased risk of harsher punishmentThe publicity a trial could involve, etc.Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Practical Reason.
Learn more about Practical reason in Law here: https://brainly.com/question/16465099
#SPJ1
Related Questions
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Ronald is trying to pay down his student loan debt as quickly as possible, so he decides not to purchase disability insurance and uses that money toward debt repayment instead. Ronald has had a bad skiing accident, and doctors anticipate he won’t be able to work again for six to nine months. Can he enroll in short-term disability insurance tomorrow and file the claim? Why or why not?
Answers
It is likely that Ronald will be able to select in Short-term disability insurance tomorrow and promptly record a claim for his current damage.
Can an Application for Short-term Disability Insurance be Made?Short-term disability insurance regularly requires a holding up period some time recently benefits can be paid out, regularly extending from a number of days to some weeks. Amid this holding up period, the guarantor person must be incapable to work due to an sickness or harm, and the holding up period will start from the date of the inability, not the date of enrollment within the protections approach.
Moreover, pre-existing conditions may be avoided from scope, meaning that Ronald's skiing mischance may not be secured in case he enlists in short-term incapacity protections after the reality. It's fundamental to read the terms and conditions of any protections approach carefully to get it what is secured and what isn't .
Learn more about disability insurance here: https://brainly.com/question/27078302
#SPJ1
A corporation is a legal entity chartered by the state, with a separate and distinct existence from its owners.
a. True
b. False
Answers
True, the corporation is an legal entity with a separate existence from it's own owners that has been granted a state charter.
What exactly is a legal entity?A legal entity is a company or organization that has legal rights and responsibilities, such as paying taxes. It is a company that is capable of entering into contracts as a supplier or a vendor and that is also capable of suing or being sued in court.
What distinguishes a legal entity?The unique number that the California Department of State gives to a limited company at the moment of registration. A seven decimal with a C at the start is a corporation entity number. An entity number for a llc or limited partners has 12 digits and no first letter.
To know more about legal entity visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29557657
#SPJ4
which government agency is charged with collecting and enforcing tax laws?
Answers
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
How long will it take for a $1000 investment to double if the bank gives you a rate of .25%?
Answers
Answer:
Number of period(n) =277.65
Explanation:
Given:
Amount invested(p) = $1,000
Amount at the end of period(A) = 2 × Amount invested = 2 × $1,000 = $2,000
Rate of interest(r) = 0.25% = 0.0025
Find:
Number of period(n) = ?
Computation:
\(A=p(1+r)^n\\\\2,000 = 1,000 (1+0.0025)^n\\\\2=(1.0025)^n\\\\n = 277.65\)
Number of period(n) =277.65
Explain the difference between comparative negligence and contributory negligence.
How is the actual cause different from probable cause?
What are the required elements of a contract?
What are compensatory damages?
What is the purpose of punitive damages?
Under what circumstances may a consumer have three days to avoid a contract?
Answers
Comparative negligence and contributory negligence are both legal concepts used in cases involving negligence. The damages awarded to the injured party are then reduced based on their percentage of fault.
Actual cause and probable cause are distinct concepts in different areas of law. The required elements of a contract include an offer, acceptance, consideration, legal capacity, and legal purpos
Comparative negligence and contributory negligence are both legal concepts used in cases involving negligence. Comparative negligence allows for a partial allocation of fault to multiple parties involved in an accident or injury.
The damages awarded to the injured party are then reduced based on their percentage of fault. For example, if the injured party is found to be 20% at fault, their damages would be reduced by 20%. Contributory negligence, on the other hand, completely bars an injured party from recovering damages if they are found to have contributed in any way to their own injury, regardless of the percentage of fault.
Actual cause and probable cause are distinct concepts in different areas of law. Actual cause refers to the direct cause of an event or injury, establishing a direct link between the defendant's actions and the harm suffered by the plaintiff. Probable cause, on the other hand, is a lower standard of proof used in criminal law to determine whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has been committed or that a person should be arrested or searched.
The required elements of a contract include an offer, acceptance, consideration, legal capacity, and legal purpose. These elements ensure that the contract is formed with mutual agreement, exchange of value, and compliance with legal requirements.
Compensatory damages are monetary awards given to the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit to compensate them for their actual losses or harm suffered. They aim to restore the plaintiff to their pre-injury or pre-contractual position by covering medical expenses, property damage, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress.
Punitive damages serve the purpose of punishing the defendant for particularly egregious conduct and deterring similar behavior in the future. They go beyond compensating the plaintiff and are awarded on top of actual damages. Punitive damages are typically granted in cases involving willful, malicious, or grossly negligent actions.
The three-day right to avoid a contract, often known as the cooling-off period, allows consumers to reconsider their decision and cancel certain contracts within a specific timeframe without penalty. This provision, granted by federal law in the United States, aims to protect consumers from high-pressure sales tactics and provide an opportunity to review and reflect on the terms of the contract before committing to it. The cooling-off period allows consumers to change their minds and avoid being bound by the contract, promoting consumer protection and informed decision-making.
To know more about Comparative negligence, visit : brainly.com/question/32769351
#SPJ11
What is required to become a reserve police officer with most police departments? The candidate must have served in the military. The candidate must have served as a police officer for at least ten years before applying. The candidate must be personally recommended for the position by the police chief and a member of the mayor’s staff. The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer.
Answers
Answer:
The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer.
Explanation:
In Indiana, reserve officers are required to complete 40 hours of basic training, as well as 24 hours of continuing in-service training each year
Why do we have a criminal justice system as opposed to a victim justice system? Explain.
Answers
The criminal justice system's goals are to defend society, deal with offenders, and rehabilitate criminals.
Why do we have a criminal justice system as opposed to a victim justice system?It accomplishes this by having the culprit be arrested and put on trial for their crimes. If found guilty, they face jail time or additional penalties including fines or community service.
Police-based services offer crucial support to crime victims, such as on-site crisis intervention and arranging for emergency medical care. A victim's short- and long-term rebuilding may also benefit from the information and referrals provided by law enforcement programs to services and resources.
Learn more about criminal justice system here
https://brainly.com/question/7207817
#SPJ1
.For the current year, Jennifer has self-employment net income of $50,000 before any Keogh deduction and no other earned income for the year. The total amount of self- employment tax related to Jennifer's earnings was $7,064. What is the maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year?
Answers
The maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year is $10,000.
The maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year depends on her net self-employment income and the applicable contribution limits.
For self-employed individuals, the maximum deductible contribution to a Keogh plan is generally calculated as a percentage of their net self-employment income. As of 2021, the contribution limit is 20% of the net self-employment income, up to a maximum of $58,000.
In Jennifer's case, if her net self-employment income is $50,000, she can calculate her maximum deductible contribution by multiplying her net self-employment income by the contribution percentage.
$50,000 x 20% = $10,000
Therefore, the maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year is $10,000.
Learn more about contribution limits.
https://brainly.com/question/32559785
#SPJ11
A Mutual fund in which no sales charge is paid by the individual investors called in
Answers
Answer:
That should be a "no- load" fund
Explanation:
A Mutual fund in which no sales charge is paid by the individual investors is called a no-load fund.
Which fund does not charge any type of sales load?
A no-load mutual fund means there will not be a sales charge when the investor buys the shares or when they sell their shares.
What is the sales charge on a mutual fund called?load
A sales charge is an additional fee paid by an investor that is used to compensate the broker or salesman for effecting that transaction. In mutual funds, the sales charge is typically called a 'load', which may be charged up-front, at the time of sale, or some other arrangement.
What are the 4 types of mutual funds?What types of mutual funds are there? Most mutual funds fall into one of four main categories – money market funds, bond funds, stock funds, and target-date funds. Each type has different features, risks, and rewards.
Learn more about Mutual funds at https://brainly.com/question/4521829
#SPJ2
Should it be more difficult or easier to impeach public officials and why
Answers
Answer:
it indeed should be harder.
Explanation:
So every people can be sure who they need to choose and vote
Help!!!!!!!!!!!!
A woman with a prior history of drunk driving was involved in a hit and run of a three-year-old girl. The jury found her guilty of manslaughter, acknowledging that she didn’t know the girl and didn’t plan to hit her. The judge sentenced her to 10 years in prison, citing that her careless and illegal behavior cost a young life and caused pain to a family. What goal of law enforcement does the judge’s reason cover?
general deterrence
incapacitation
punishment
rehabilitation
Answers
Answer: i think it's C, they want her to deal with the consequences
Answer:
general deterrence
Explanation:
it occurred accidentally it wasn't intentional
Suppose a politician is critical of a government pollution permit policy that they say allows companies to buy and sell the right to pollute. They argue that the public’s right to breathe clean air and the health of the planet require real regulation instead of this type of government policy
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Firstly, the politician's emphasis on the public's right to breathe clean air highlights the fundamental importance of environmental protection. Clean air is essential for human health and well-being, and it is the government's responsibility to ensure that the air quality meets acceptable standards. By allowing companies to trade pollution permits, there is a risk that certain areas or communities may suffer disproportionately from pollution, especially if those areas are economically disadvantaged or lack political influence. This approach raises questions about environmental justice and the equitable distribution of pollution burdens.
Moreover, the politician's concern for the health of the planet reflects an understanding of the global impact of pollution. Pollution does not respect national boundaries, and its effects can extend far beyond the immediate vicinity of the emitting source. Climate change, in particular, is a pressing global issue that demands collective action. While a market-based approach might incentivize emissions reductions, it may not be sufficient to address the urgency and magnitude of the environmental challenges we face. Comprehensive and enforceable regulations are necessary to ensure that environmental goals are met effectively.
The argument against the government's pollution permit policy highlights the limitations of relying solely on market mechanisms to address environmental problems. Critics of such policies argue that they create a system where companies can simply pay for the right to pollute, effectively commodifying pollution and externalizing the costs onto society. They contend that true regulation, which sets clear standards and enforces compliance, is needed to protect the environment and safeguard public health.
However, it is worth noting that pollution permit systems, such as cap-and-trade programs, can have their advantages. When properly designed and implemented, they can provide flexibility, incentivize emissions reductions, and allow for cost-effective pollution control. By putting a price on pollution, they create economic incentives for companies to adopt cleaner technologies and practices.
Ultimately, finding the right balance between market mechanisms and regulatory approaches is crucial. A comprehensive approach to environmental protection may involve a combination of market-based solutions, such as pollution trading schemes, along with robust regulations and enforcement mechanisms. This would allow for both economic efficiency and environmental effectiveness, ensuring that the public's right to clean air and a healthy planet are adequately protected.
consumer protection statutes may require a writing that is more detailed than the writing required by the statute of frauds provision of the uniform commercial code.
Answers
It is accurate to say what it says. The writing required by the uniform commercial code's statute of frauds section may be superseded by writings that are more detailed under consumer protection laws.
What legislation serves to safeguard consumers?The goal of consumer protection law is to safeguard consumers from dishonest business practices that are detrimental to their interests. It involves laws and regulations designed to stop companies from engaging in unfair, dishonest, or fraudulent sales practices. In addition to the FTCA, federal statutes like the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) and the Federal Food and Drug Act (FFDA) impose numerous safety criteria on consumer goods, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. Federal consumer protection rules are enforced by the FTC to stop unfair commercial practices, deception, and fraud. The Commission also enforces federal antitrust rules, which forbid anticompetitive acquisitions and other commercial practices that can result in higher costs, fewer options, or less innovation.To learn more about consumer protection laws, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29905846
It is accurate to say what it says. The writing required by the uniform commercial code's statute of frauds section may be superseded by writings that are more detailed under consumer protection laws.
What legislation serves to safeguard consumers?
The goal of consumer protection law is to safeguard consumers from dishonest business practices that are detrimental to their interests.
It involves laws and regulations designed to stop companies from engaging in unfair, dishonest, or fraudulent sales practices.
In addition to the FTCA, federal statutes like the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) and the Federal Food and Drug Act (FFDA) impose numerous safety criteria on consumer goods, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics.
Federal consumer protection rules are enforced by the FTC to stop unfair commercial practices, deception, and fraud.
The Commission also enforces federal antitrust rules, which forbid anticompetitive acquisitions and other commercial practices that can result in higher costs, fewer options, or less innovation.
To learn more about consumer protection laws, refer to:
brainly.com/question/29905846
#SPJ4
Where in the constitution are federal courts explicitly granted the power of judicial review?.
Answers
The judicial powers of the State are vested in the Supreme Court, the nation's highest court. Lower federal courts exist, although they are not officially established by the Constitution.
Instead, Congress created them within Constitutional authority after concluding that they were required. The Supreme Court has judicial power over "all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution" according to Section 2 of Article III, which means that the court's primary duty is to determine whether or not legislation is valid. Among the various types of cases, it handles include those involving ambassadors, those involving admiralty and marine jurisdiction, and disputes between two or more nations. Legal disputes that reach the Supreme Court often include questions of statutory construction, constitutionality, and/or their respective statutes' applicability. Judicial review is the procedure through which it may be determined whether or not a statute is in accordance with the Constitution. The judicial branch relies on this procedure to ensure that the legislative and executive branches are subject to appropriate checks and balances. In the absence of a written constitution, courts rely on their implicit authority to conduct judicial review. In a landmark decision from 1803, the Supreme Court established its inherent authority to conduct judicial review in the case of Marbury v. Madison.
Learn more about the judicial review at:
brainly.com/question/14027482
#SPJ4
what are political crimes statistics?
Answers
Answer:
At one extreme, crimes such as treason, sedition, and terrorism are political because they represent a direct challenge to the government in power. Espionage is usually considered a political crime.
Explanation:
How is finding distances in a coordinate plane helpful to a pilot
Answers
Enhances navigation, aids flight planning, facilitates course corrections, helps avoid restricted areas, assists in emergency situations.
How does finding distances in a coordinate plane benefit pilots?Finding distances in a coordinate plane is helpful to a pilot in several ways:
Navigation: Pilots can determine the distance between their current location and their destination by calculating the distance between the coordinates. This helps them plan their route and estimate travel time. Flight Planning: By knowing the distances between waypoints, which are specific coordinates along the flight path, pilots can accurately plan their flight, adjust their speed, and ensure they reach each waypoint on schedule.Course Corrections: If a pilot needs to make a course correction during the flight, knowing the distances in the coordinate plane allows them to calculate the new heading and adjust their flight path accordingly. Avoiding Restricted Areas: Pilots can use the coordinate plane to identify and maintain a safe distance from restricted areas, such as no-fly zones, military airspace, or hazardous areas.Emergency Situations: In case of an emergency or diversion, pilots can quickly determine the distance to alternative airports, emergency landing sites, or navigational aids, assisting in decision-making during critical situations.By utilizing distances in a coordinate plane, pilots can enhance their situational awareness, ensure accurate navigation, and make informed decisions for safe and efficient flight operations.
Learn more about emergency situations
brainly.com/question/32245575
#SPJ11
4.
Draw Inferences Why do you think that a State legislature might want to call
for an advisory vote by the people before it ratifies an amendment proposed
by Congress?
Answers
Amendment refers to additions, subtraction or alterations to the constitution and are usually ratified into law after having majority of vote for the proposed provision.
An advisory vote refers to the voting done by citizen to measure their decision and views on certain matters before enacting into law.
Therefore, the State legislature will call for an advisory vote so that to assess the common people views on the proposed amendment by the Congress.
Learn more about this here
brainly.com/question/18679443
what are the legal challenges of a crime scene search
Answers
Legal challenges of crime scene searches include Fourth Amendment protection, chain of custody, privacy rights, consent, scope, privileges, and expert testimony.
The constitutional rights of citizens, particularly the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures are at the heart of the legal issues raised by crime scene investigations. A valid search warrant must be obtained by law enforcement, unless there are extenuating circumstances like consent or an emergency.
The search must be reasonable in scope and restricted to the permitted areas or things listed in the warrant. To guarantee that evidence will be allowed to be used in court, chain of custody procedures must be followed. Individuals present at the crime scene should have their privacy rights respected.
In addition, issues with privileged information's admissibility, the expertise and reliability of expert witnesses and adherence to pertinent laws and regulations may come up.
Learn more about crime scene at:
brainly.com/question/1329009
#SPJ4
How to murder sunny in a good way?
Answers
Answer:
Attack on Titan style.
Explanation:
why not
Answer:
Murdering someone in a good way isn't a thingExplanation:
Murdering someone / something is never a good thing and there is not a good way to murder someone...
Hope you understand <3
CÁCH LÀM BÀI THU HOẠCH
Answers
Answer:
Bạn nên hỏi bằng Tiếng Anh ấy ạ. Sẽ có nhiều người dễ chỉ hơn ạ. Đa số người nước ngoài, hỏi Tiếng Việt họ không hiểu đâu ạ.
statutes in many states have permitted a person who has a claim against another to give up, or , his or her claim without an exchange of by making a written statement to that effect.
Answers
The type of legal provision that allows individuals to relinquish their claims against others without an exchange of consideration, by making a written statement to that effect, is known as a release or a waiver.
A release or waiver is a legal clause that enables people to freely give up or abandon their claims against other people without expecting anything in return. This clause gives people the option to expressly waive their right to file a lawsuit or request compensation for a specific claim or incident in a written statement.
People acknowledge that they have voluntarily and knowingly chosen to waive their rights by signing a release or waiver which exonerates the other party from any liability or responsibility related to the claim. This legal tool is frequently employed in a variety of situations including liability waivers for taking part in particular activities or events, contract negotiations and personal injury settlements.
To know more about waiver here
brainly.com/question/31838925
#SPJ4
The complete question is "Which type of legal provision allows individuals to relinquish their claims against others without an exchange of consideration, by making a written statement to that effect?"
two things about "i've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck"
1. implying that nixon's denial of the watergate break in is hard to believe
2. attorney general mitchell would support nixon
Answers
The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.
The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.
Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.
To know more about Nixon's visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1131063
#SPJ11
One of the major strengths of the 1964 civil rights act was to give the federal government the authority to initiate enforcement of court orders or civil rights legislation, rather than wait for a claim to be brought by affected individuals or groups.
Answers
A major strength that came with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was that the Federal government did not need a claim to be brought to enforce civil rights legislation so this is True.
What did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 do?It made it a federal crime to discriminate against people based on demographic factors such as color, race and religion.
Because such discrimination became a federal crime, the federal government now had to right to enforce civil rights legislation without people bringing claims because they were simply enforcing the law.
Find out more on the Civil Rights Act at https://brainly.com/question/1261890.
Help please ! Will Mark Brainly!
Answers
Answer:
I may not be 100% correct but I believe its B
Quality of life policing is a patrol strategy whereby officers target low level violations with its aim to prevent serious crime. Some accuse these agencies adopting this strategy as merely harassing the population. Find at least two recent news articles discussing this issue, report on your findings, and give your opinion as to the validity of this patrol strategy. at least 500 words
Answers
Answer:
Quality of life policing, also known as broken windows policing, has been a controversial topic for several years. The strategy involves targeting low-level offenses such as loitering, panhandling, and public urination with the aim of preventing serious crime. The idea behind quality of life policing is that cracking down on minor offenses will deter more serious criminal activity from taking place.
However, critics of the strategy argue that it leads to the harassment of vulnerable populations and exacerbates existing inequalities. In this report, I will discuss two recent news articles on this issue and provide my opinion on the validity of this patrol strategy.
The first article is from the New York Times, published in June 2021. The article discusses how quality of life policing has become a major issue in the race for the next mayor of New York City. Many candidates have promised to reform or even abolish the strategy, citing concerns about the way it has been implemented in the past.
The article notes that quality of life policing was popularized in the 1990s by then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Police Commissioner William Bratton. During their tenure, the NYPD made over 250,000 quality of life arrests per year. While crime did decrease during this period, many argue that it was due to other factors such as the decline in crack cocaine use and the economic boom of the 1990s.
The article goes on to describe how quality of life policing has disproportionately affected low-income communities of color. For example, in 2019, over 80% of quality of life summonses were issued in neighborhoods where people of color make up the majority of the population. Critics argue that this is evidence of racial bias in the implementation of the strategy.
The second article is from The Guardian, published in April 2021. The article discusses how quality of life policing has been criticized for exacerbating the homelessness crisis in Los Angeles. The article notes that the Los Angeles Police Department has increased its enforcement of quality of life offenses in recent years, leading to a rise in arrests for offenses such as camping on the sidewalk or sleeping in a car.
Critics argue that this approach does nothing to address the root causes of homelessness, such as lack of affordable housing and mental health issues. Instead, they argue that quality of life policing only serves to further criminalize homelessness and make life more difficult for those who are already struggling.
In my opinion, quality of life policing is a flawed strategy that has been shown to disproportionately affect marginalized communities. While it may have some short-term benefits in reducing certain types of crime, it ultimately fails to address the root causes of crime and only serves to further criminalize poverty and homelessness.
Instead, law enforcement agencies should focus on addressing the systemic issues that lead to crime, such as poverty, inequality, and lack of access to affordable housing and healthcare. This requires a more holistic approach that involves investing in communities and providing support to those in need, rather than simply cracking down on low-level offenses.
In conclusion, quality of life policing is a contentious issue that requires careful consideration and thoughtful reform. While it may have some benefits in reducing certain types of crime, the strategy has been shown to disproportionately affect marginalized communities and exacerbate existing inequalities. Law enforcement agencies should instead focus on addressing the root causes of crime and providing support to those in need.
economy with a government but with no foreign trade? A. Household saving will be equal to investment B. The Sum of consumption and saving will be equal to the sum of income and taxes. C. The sum of household income and business profits must be equal to the sum of consumption, government spending, and investment D. An increase in the government deficit will force an increase in investment. E. If the government has a balanced budget, household consumption will equal the difference between income and saving.
Answers
The sum of consumption and saving will be equal to the sum of income and taxes is the economy with a government but with no foreign trade. The correct option is B.
In such a system, household income from all sources wages, salaries, profits, etc. equals total consumption plus savings. The portion of household income that is spent on goods and services is referred to as consumption, while the portion that is saved for future use is referred to as saving. One element of household income is the money the government collects in taxes.
Therefore, in an economy with a government but no foreign trade, the total of consumption and saving (representing the use of household income) will indeed be equal to the total of income (including taxes). The correct option is B.
Learn more about foreign trade at:
brainly.com/question/29545649
#SPJ4
Austin became a California resident on June 1, 2021. He earned the following income during 2021:
Texas wages from January 1st to May 31th of $45,000.
California wages from June 1st to December 31st of $50,000.
What amount of his wages will California tax?
A $45,000
B $47,500
C $50,000
D $95,000
Answers
The amount of Austin's wages that California will tax, given when Austin became a resident of California, is C. $50,000 .
What amount will be taxed by California ?When you are from California and are considered a California resident, you are liable to pay taxes on income that you have made, wherever you are in the world . However , it is important to note that only income you earn while you are legally a California resident , will be liable for taxation under California law.
Now, Austin became a California resident on June 1, 2021. This means that every income he earned from this point on, would be treated as California income. This means that the entire amount of $ 50, 000 that Austin made in that period, would be taxable in California because he was a California resident at the time .
Find out more on California taxes at https://brainly.com/question/29236130
#SPJ1
Joe, 17 year old teen, dented someone's parked car on accident. He sees cameras on the owners car and possible house and out of gulit left a note with his name and number on it apologizing. The owner of the car finally called and was nice about the situation but wants to discuss how it should be fixed. Joe discussed this with his parents next. They were furious, saying that it was a bad idea and that he should've driven off and left nothing. They don't think they can afford the dent as they don’t have collision insurance. His parents said to never contact the owner of the car again. Joe, not knowing this parents didn't have that type of insurance nor not knowing what to do, he just sits in frustration and confusion.
What should he do?
What should his parents do?
How could this situation in general be solved?
What would happen if Joe didn't try to contact the owner of the car ever again?
(PLEASE ANSWER IN FULL DETAIL)
Answers
Answer:
Joe did the right thing by leaving a note with his name and number on it to take responsibility for the accident. It shows maturity and responsibility, and it is the ethical thing to do. Even though his parents may have been angry about the situation, leaving the scene of the accident without taking responsibility could have resulted in legal consequences and could have caused more problems in the future.
In this situation, Joe should communicate with the car owner and discuss how the dent can be fixed. He can offer to pay for the damages out of his own pocket, or suggest getting a few quotes from different body shops to compare prices. If the owner agrees to accept payment from Joe, he should get a written agreement or receipt of payment to avoid any legal disputes in the future.
Joe's parents should support him in taking responsibility for his actions and help him find a solution to the problem. They can work together with Joe to find a solution that works for everyone involved, and help him negotiate with the car owner to reach a fair resolution.
In general, situations like this can be solved through open communication and taking responsibility for one's actions. By communicating honestly and openly with the other party involved, it is often possible to find a solution that works for everyone.
If Joe didn't try to contact the owner of the car ever again, it could result in legal consequences. Leaving the scene of an accident without taking responsibility is a serious offense, and could result in criminal charges or a civil lawsuit. It is always best to take responsibility for one's actions and try to find a solution to the problem.