What does AAA stand for New Deal?

If the posters had implied that Montana endorsed the SJM news, it could have made a difference to the court in a potential lawsuit. Using a company's name or brand to promote or endorse a product or service without permission can violate trademark laws, which protect a company's intellectual property rights.

If Montana had not permitted its name to be used in the posters, and it was implied that the company endorsed SJM news, Montana could argue that the posters infringed on their trademark rights. Using Montana's name without permission could be considered false advertising and potentially damage the company's reputation, which could result in financial damages.

In addition to potential legal consequences, implying that Montana endorsed the SJM news could harm the company's reputation and lead to negative publicity.

To know more about intellectual property rights, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/169200

#SPJ4

Answer:

When Can the Police Stop and Frisk You on the Street?

A look at the history of "stop and frisk," and the circumstances required to make its use legal.

by Marcia Layton Turner

updated September 04, 2020 · 3 min read

Man standing by crosswalk

The United States' “stop and frisk" rule originated from the Fourth Amendment's language regarding unreasonable searches and seizures.

The policy actually allows police to stop and “pat down" anyone they suspect may be committing, have committed, or are about to commit a crime. Their suspicion alone is what permits them to stop you and search you.

The current stop and frisk policy has been legal since 1968, when the Supreme Court ruled in Terry v. Ohio to allow police officers the flexibility to temporarily detain and search someone they suspect has done or is in the process of doing something illegal.

Since then, all 50 states have adopted this ruling in some form.

Unfortunately, rather than rooting out crime, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New York reports that 9 out of 10 New Yorkers who have been stopped and frisked were innocent. Some people see stop and frisk as a form of harassment.

Explanation:

If a police officer suspects you are in some way involved in illegal activity, they have the authority to stop you, whether you're walking, driving, biking, boating, or engaged in some other activity.

“During a stop, you are not under arrest, but you are not free to leave," explains Tod Spodek, managing partner of the Spodek Law Group.

“When an officer stops your car, the officer must have a reasonable suspicion that someone in the car committed a crime, or probable cause to believe the driver committed a traffic violation."

The amount of Austin's wages that California will tax, given when Austin became a resident of California, is C. $50,000 .

When you are from California and are considered a California resident, you are liable to pay taxes on income that you have made, wherever you are in the world . However , it is important to note that only income you earn while you are legally a California resident , will be liable for taxation under California law.

Now, Austin became a California resident on June 1, 2021. This means that every income he earned from this point on, would be treated as California income. This means that the entire amount of $ 50, 000 that Austin made in that period, would be taxable in California because he was a California resident at the time .

Find out more on California taxes at https://brainly.com/question/29236130

#SPJ1

President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed and passed the Social Security Act in 1935, which provided three vital systems for public assistance. This statement is true.

The Social Security Act offers insurance and welfare programs for the elderly, unemployed and disadvantaged Americans, and was signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935. The program was originally intended to be the main source of income for Americans who attained retirement age. For the purpose of providing financial benefits to people who were 65 and older based on lifetime payroll tax contributions, the government started collecting Social Security Tax.  People who contributed to the scheme but wouldn't participate long enough to become vested in monthly benefits were also awarded one-time payments.

To read more about Franklin Roosevelt see:

https://brainly.com/question/21567271

#SPJ9

Answer:

he may file a lawsuit in Arizona

Criminal history, youth at discharge, and neighborhood characteristics were the three variables most frequently linked to the probability of recidivism across conditions.

Recidivism is commonly calculated as the percentage of criminals in the cohort who have successfully completed the obey period who have participated in at least one recidivist incident.

Numerous factors can contribute to recidivism, such as social interactions while incarcerated, a lack of job and financial opportunity, depression, a failure to reintegrate into society, an invariable lifestyle and circle after release, and the failure to address the underlying issues that lead to crime while incarcerated.

To know more about risk of recidivism visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19113884

#SPJ4

Answer:

At-large

Explanation:

Hearsay is impermissible because the opposing attorney cannot question the person who made the original statement to determine the statement's veracity.

Hearsay refers to an out-of-court statement offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Generally, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court because it is considered unreliable and lacks the safeguards that come with live testimony and cross-examination.

One reason why hearsay is impermissible is that it deprives the opposing party of the opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the original statement. Cross-examination is a critical part of the legal process as it allows the opposing counsel to challenge the credibility and reliability of the witness's testimony. When hearsay evidence is presented, however, the opposing counsel cannot question the original speaker about the circumstances under which the statement was made or any other relevant information that may impact its reliability.

There are some exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as when the statement falls under a recognized hearsay exception or when it is used for a non-hearsay purpose, but generally speaking, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court.

learn more about Hearsay here

https://brainly.com/question/31668354

#SPJ11

The primary objective of a lifetime appointment is to safeguard Court Justices from unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branches and to ensure the integrity of the authority they hold.

One of the most significant decisions that a president of the United States can make is to appoint someone to the Supreme Court. This is due to the fact that, unless they resign, retire, or are removed from office, Supreme Court justices have lifetime tenure under the Constitution. This is unmistakable from most different majority rules systems, where high court judges either have compulsory retirement ages or severe service time restraints.

Judicial independence and democratic governance are not dependent on lifetime tenure. The salary of the justices is protected while they are in office, and impeachment sets a very high standard for their removal. Additionally, the United States is one of the few major democracies that grants its constitutional court judges lifelong authority.

To learn more about Supreme Court visit :

https://brainly.com/question/10739091

#SPJ1

Answer:

28 percent

Explanation:

Accidents are caused by a variety of factors such as overspeeding, lack of concentration and mechanical faults. Alcohol impairs the driver in ways such as low concentration and blurry vision.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately twenty eight percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016. This was discovered by several blood alcohol concentration tests done on the drivers.

The crime of murder was divided into first and second degree to differentiate between intentional and premeditated killings (first degree) and killings that lack premeditation or involve mitigating circumstances (second degree).

The division of murder into first and second degree originated from the need to distinguish between different degrees of culpability and intent in homicide cases. First-degree murder typically refers to intentional killings that are premeditated and committed with malice aforethought. These are considered the most serious and heinous offenses, often involving planned acts of violence or killings committed with specific intent. On the other hand, second-degree murder encompasses killings that lack premeditation or occur in the heat of the moment. These may involve acts of violence without premeditation or killings that occur during the commission of another serious crime. Second-degree murder is generally considered less severe than first-degree murder and may involve mitigating factors that reduce the degree of culpability. The division into first and second degree allows for different levels of punishment and legal treatment based on the intent, premeditation, and circumstances surrounding the crime of murder.

Learn more about intentional killings here:

https://brainly.com/question/14391016

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Beyond its intrinsic value, biodiversity is necessary to human survival. Ecosystem diversity is crucial to ecosystem integrity, which in turn enables our life support, giving us a livable climate, breathable air, and drinkable water.

Answer: free food from livestock raised by Heifer International

Explanation:

During this time, Teddy Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and Woodrow Wilson served as the three progressive presidents. These presidents worked to advance the nation's political, social, and economic systems.

The only person to hold both of these positions was William Howard Taft, who was elected the 27th President of the United States (1909–1913) and then the tenth Chief Justice of the United States (1921–1930). He established a postal savings system, established the Interstate Commerce Commission, approved the first tariff reform since 1897, and brought over 75 antitrust cases to court, far more than "trust-buster" Theodore Roosevelt did. William Howard Taft was an indecisive leader and an unproductive president, especially in light of the successful administrations of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. He supported an income tax modification and authorized corporation and inheritance taxes to raise money for the government. He agreed to the proposal calling for senators to be elected directly. He also backed the Children's Bureau, which assisted in ending child labour and enhancing family health care.

Learn more about William Howard Taft here

https://brainly.com/question/26288982

#SPJ4

Without knowing the specific crime for which Tom was found guilty on appeal, it is impossible to determine what his punishment will be. The nature of the crime, the laws of the jurisdiction in which it was committed, and the judge's discretion in sentencing all play a role in determining the appropriate punishment.

For example, if Tom was found guilty of a misdemeanor offense, his punishment may involve a fine, community service, probation, or a short jail sentence. If he was convicted of a more serious crime, such as a felony, he may be sentenced to a lengthy prison term, fines, and/or community service. In some cases, the judge may also impose additional penalties such as restitution or forfeiture of property.In addition, if Tom is a repeat offender or if there were aggravating factors in his case, such as the use of a weapon or harm to a victim, his punishment may be more severe. Ultimately, the specifics of Tom's case and the discretion of the judge will determine his punishment.

To know more about punishment
visit https://brainly.com/question/33524150
#SPJ11

Answer:

d

Explanation:

a two-thirds majority of Congress

Answer:

The corporations engage EPA when they are putting laws into regulations is described below in brief details.

Explanation:

Step 1: EPA Recommends a Regulation. The Agency investigates the problems and, if needed, recommends a regulation, also identified as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM).

Step 2: EPA Examines Your Observations and Problems a Final Rule.

Step 3: The Regulation is Classified in the Code of Federal Regulations.

Tort suits generally come from unexpected instances of carelessness or bad behavior. option (b)

A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or injury to another person or property. Tort suits can arise from a wide range of circumstances, including accidents, intentional wrongdoing, and negligence. Negligence is the most common basis for tort claims and arises when a person or entity fails to exercise reasonable care, causing harm to another person.

Tort claims can also be based on intentional conduct, such as assault or battery, defamation, or false imprisonment. While failure to comply with industry regulations or planning for unexpected catastrophes may contribute to tort claims, the primary source of such claims is unexpected instances of carelessness or bad behavior.

Learn more about Tort suits

https://brainly.com/question/29890817

#SPJ4

a.

The net profit margin is 2.05​%.  ​

The total asset turnover is 3.47.  

The equity multiplier is 3.15.​

b.

The ROE is 22.41​%.  

c.

The total assets turnover should be 3.76.

The total asset turnover should be 8.36​% higher.

Before the given parliamentary acts were passed in order to the regulate working, then children are not allowed to work for more than 12 hours in a day.

By 1833, any Government exceeded what become to be the primary of many acts handling running situations and hours. At first, there has been restricted energy to implement those acts however because the century advanced the guidelines have been enforced extra strictly.

Nonetheless, the hours and running situations have been nevertheless very difficult with the aid of using today’s standards, and no guidelines have been in region to defend person male workers. Working in the road jobs protected shining shoes, promoting newspapers, canning fish, making garments and weaving fabrics. With the understanding that youngsters labored in factories, mines, and different jobs we could speak approximately their wages and hours. A regular day for those abused youngsters become everywhere from 12 to 19 hours a day.

Learn more about parliamentary visit: brainly.com/question/1504316

#SPJ4

Answer:

A trade agreement

Explanation:

Answer:

B. A trade agreement

Explanation:

Answer:

k I will do so

Explanation:

mark me brainy plz

Answer: It is not.

Explanation:

The U.S. Constitution has a clause known as the Supremacy Clause that places the Constitution of the United States as well as all Federal law that are not in violation of the Constitution above State laws and Constitutions.

This is why Federal Voting rights were able to prevail over the State Constitutions in the South after the Civil War.  

For this reason, the Federal Statute enacted by Congress will take precedence over the Wisconsin State Constitutional Provision.

Answer:The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."—Patrick Henry1.

Explanation:

Prior to the Supreme Court ruling in Tennessee v. Garner, the use of deadly force by the police was governed by the fleeing felon rule.

The fleeing felon rule, also known as the "use of deadly force to prevent escape" rule, allowed law enforcement officers to use deadly force against a fleeing suspect if the officer believed that the suspect had committed a felony and posed a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others. Under this rule, the mere act of fleeing from the police was often considered sufficient justification for the use of deadly force.

However, the Supreme Court's decision in Tennessee v. Garner in 1985 modified this approach. The case involved the shooting of an unarmed teenager who was attempting to flee after a burglary. The Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits the use of deadly force to apprehend a fleeing suspect unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others.

In its ruling, the Court emphasized the importance of balancing law enforcement's interest in apprehending suspects with the individual's right to be free from unreasonable seizures under the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that the use of deadly force against an unarmed and non-dangerous fleeing suspect is a violation of the suspect's constitutional rights.

Following the Tennessee v. Garner ruling, law enforcement agencies across the United States have been required to adhere to a standard that allows the use of deadly force only when there is a reasonable belief that the suspect poses an immediate threat of death or serious bodily harm. This standard, often referred to as the "objective reasonableness" standard, has significantly limited the circumstances under which law enforcement officers can use deadly force against fleeing individuals.

Learn more about Supreme Court here

https://brainly.com/question/341135

#SPJ11

Answer:

I would think Italians Americans to Russian Americans being more related to the cold war

Explanation:

I may be wrong

Answer:

Italian Americans

Explanation:

The jurisdiction for this case would likely be the state of Oklahoma if the injury occurred within the state and the injured party, Stevens, is a citizen of Oklahoma. The court in Oklahoma would have jurisdiction over the case as it would be the state where the injury occurred and where Stevens, the plaintiff, resides.

Earning enough money to take a vacation is a compensation rewards of work factor. The correct option is c.

Earned income enables the ability to take a vacation, which is option C- Compensation. Wages, salaries and bonuses are all examples of financial rewards for work, which collectively constitute compensation. A concrete result of the compensation factor is the ability to earn enough money to take a vacation.

Demonstrating the connection between one's efforts at work and the financial resources that allow them to engage in leisure activities. This aspect of pay demonstrates how the financial benefits of work can be translated into rewarding experiences and benefits outside the workplace which benefits employees general wellbeing and work-life balance.

To know more about financial resources here

brainly.com/question/32199479

#SPJ3