What happens when a court reverses a lower court's decision ?

The three-word expression used to describe whether a congressional body will approve or deny treaties and nominations for ambassadors, public ministers, and judges are senate, advice and consent.

Learn more about the Constitution of US with the help of the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/838122

#SPJ4

Answer:

The US Constitution

Explanation:

Judges are appointed to uphold the constitution.

A broker-dealer assists a corporation going public by acting as an underwriter.

In this role, the broker-dealer helps the corporation to issue and sell its securities to the public. This involves determining the price of the securities, creating a prospectus for potential investors, and managing the sale of the securities to the public.

As an underwriter, the broker-dealer also assumes some of the risk associated with the offering by agreeing to buy any unsold securities. This helps to ensure that the corporation is able to raise the necessary capital through the offering. Overall, the broker-dealer plays a crucial role in helping the corporation to go public and raise capital from investors.

Learn more about broker-dealer brainly.com/question/14330803

#SPJ11

No one is unaffected by he consequences of DUI.

The definitions of DUIs and DWIs differ slightly: Driving under the influence is referred to as a DUI, but driving while dru.nk or impaired is referred to as a DWI. A DUI accusation might indicate that the motorist was operating their vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or other substances. driving when intoxicated or otherwise unfit to drive, or trying to drive while intoxicated.

In California, the penalties for a conviction for a first-time DUI often include three years of unofficial probation, fines of $390 plus "penalty assessments" (totaling about $2000), and completing a first-offender alcohol program, which entails a 30-hour seminar at a cost of about $500.

A first-time DWI is considered a Class B misdemeanor in Texas. If found guilty, you might be penalized with a fine of up to 2000

Read more on DUI here: https://brainly.com/question/988799

#SPJ1

The correct response is C) Restrictions on state regulations that burden interstate commerce.

A regulation is a set of specifications made by a federal government agency to carry out a law that Congress has passed. To help with the implementation of statutes like the Federal Reserve Act, the Bank Holding Company Act, and the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve Board, for instance, has produced regulations over the years. Regulations suggest the guidelines that a body or authority establishes and upholds. They are legitimately enforced. Contrarily, rules are the fundamental standards of instructions that specify how to carry out a task appropriately. Local regulations include orders issued by county commissioners courts and ordinances and other rules passed by municipalities.

Learn more about state regulations here

https://brainly.com/question/5244371

#SPJ4

The dormant commerce refers to

A) The power of the federal government to regulate interstate commerce

B) The power of the federal government to regulate commerce with foreign nations

C) Restrictions on state regulations that burden interstate commerce

D) The power reserved to the Chief Executive to regulate commerce in national emergencies.

Over the years, decades, and centuries, Consumer protections are developed to safeguard the public from toxic, defective, and dangerous merchandise. Food safety for instance is one consumer protection that

has been around since Biblical times.

Their area majorly three consumer protection agencies-

Consumer product safety commission(CPSC)-

Was aimed at protecting the general public “against unreasonable

risks of injuries related to shopper merchandise.”

Food and drug administration (FDA)-

The basis for controlling how food is handled and made has been with the U.S. Since the late eighteenth century.-

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-

Liable for guaranteeing the supply of meat, poultry, and egg merchandise area unit safe.

For more information over the consumer protection please refer the link below -

https://brainly.com/question/1862829

Courts responded on the grounds that the burdens of nuisance abatement that would be placed on the polluter and the community required courts to set regulations that assured that polluters would never be required to abate their nuisances past the point where they could no longer be tolerated.  

The eradication of a problem by the party who has suffered without resorting to legal action is referred to as abatement of nuisance. The law does not favor this type of remedy, but is accessible in specific situations.

Occasionally, a plaintiff's latent sensitivity or susceptibility to more severe harm causes the plaintiff's injuries on abatement of nuisance to be far worse than those that would have been sustained by a typical individual.

Therefore, the nuisance abatement reassured that polluters wouldn't ever be obliged to stop their annoyances before they were intolerable.  

Learn more about the nuisance abatement, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/17751112

#SPJ4

The c-r-i-m-e that was committed by Retired Police Swapang was that of murder.

According to the Law, when an individual unlawfully ends another person's life with premeditated intent, it is classified as murder. Premeditated passion includes the intention of killing someone or causing grave bodily harm, or displaying careless disregard for human life that poses a severe and unnecessary risk.

The former Police Swapang fired his gun at Mr. Swabe resulting in his death. It can be deduced from the circumstance that he first discharged his firearm before taking aim at Mr. Swabe, implying that he was conscious of his actions and intended to shoot him.

Find out more on c-r-i-m-e at https://brainly.com/question/6203610

#SPJ1

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Because you should be patient

The best action to take to help a co-worker from aggressors is to A. Ask another employee who is walking into the workplace to help you disrupt the situation.

This refers to the disagreement that exists between two or more entities where there is a constant struggle among them.

Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario of a person being harrassed in the parking lot, the best action to take based on that the aggressors do not work there is to ask another employee who is walking into the workplace to help you disrupt the situation.

Read more about conflict resolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/24769299

#SPJ1

Answer:

um so get together with the people who have the same number as you then rehearse the section the act it out so just use ur hands to talk and move a little

Explanation:

According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.

What is criminal?

The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.

According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.

Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.

Learn more about on criminal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/23059652

#SPJ1

Courtney's memory loss in the chapter "Nightmare" is a moving illustration of the psychological wounds that soldiers endure long after they leave the battlefield.

Memory loss results in loss of identity and sense of self in addition to knowledge loss. For example, Courtney's inability to remember the names of her fellow soldiers shows how fragmented her identity is and how she feels isolated from others who have gone through the same tragedy. Furthermore, Courtney's concern for the safety and well-being of her fellow soldiers raises the possibility of a strong sense of survivor's guilt. His memory loss may be a coping mechanism for him as he struggles with the idea that he has lived while others have not.

Learn more about memory loss, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28826460

#SPJ1

Perjury is (a) a false statement during a deposition. Perjury refers to knowingly and willfully providing false information while under oath, typically in a legal setting such as a deposition, trial, or other official proceedings.

Perjury refers to a false statement made under oath in a legal proceeding. This can include lying during a deposition or trial testimony, or submitting false information in a written legal document such as an affidavit or sworn statement. It is a serious crime that can result in fines, imprisonment, and other legal consequences.

Perjury involves deliberately making false statements or concealing important information with the intention of misleading a court or legal proceeding. It can also refer to tampering with evidence, such as altering or destroying documents, or encouraging others to lie or withhold information. Perjury can undermine the integrity of the legal system and prevent justice from being served, which is why it is taken very seriously and can carry severe penalties.

Learn more about Perjury: https://brainly.com/question/30312181

#SPJ11

The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.

The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.

Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.

It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.

In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.

To know more about Movement visit-

brainly.com/question/11223271

#SPJ11

In the United States, the Constitution assigns each branch of government a distinct duty in formulating public policy. Separation of powers is the term used to describe how our system distributes responsibility.

To learn more about Separation of powers, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/18453855

All of these are ways to express a legal description EXCEPT benchmarks. Option B

A benchmark is a point of reference for surveying or mapping, often a physical mark on a permanent object such as a building or monument.

The method of expressing a legal description that is NOT one of the ways is "benchmarks."

While benchmarks may be used in the process of creating a legal description, they are not typically considered a method of expressing the description itself.

The other three methods listed are ways to express a legal description:

a. Rectangular survey: A rectangular survey is a system of surveying land in a grid pattern, with each parcel of land described by its location in the grid.

b. Lot and block: A lot and block system is a method of describing a parcel of land by its location within a subdivision or plat, often using a map or plan of the subdivision.

c. Metes and bounds: The metes and bounds system is a method of describing a parcel of land by its boundaries and physical landmarks, often using measurements and angles to define the boundaries.

Hence, the correct answer is benchmarks.

Learn more about legal description at:https://brainly.com/question/24257457

#SPJ1

In South Africa, the courts may consider various factors when determining whether a custom is regarded as an indigenous legal rule or not.

One such factor is the degree to which the custom is accepted and practiced within the relevant community. The courts may also consider whether the custom has a long-standing history within the community and whether it is consistent with other customary practices and values of the community. Additionally, the courts may consider whether the custom is consistent with the values and principles enshrined in the South African Constitution. For example, in the case of Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha, the South African Constitutional Court considered the customary law rule of primogeniture, which held that only male heirs could inherit property. The Court held that this custom was inconsistent with the equality provisions of the Constitution and could not be regarded as a valid customary law rule. Therefore, in deciding whether a custom would be regarded as an indigenous legal rule or not, the South African courts would consider a range of factors, including the degree of acceptance and practice within the relevant community, the historical and cultural context of the custom, and its consistency with constitutional values and principles.

To know more about South African Constitution:

https://brainly.com/question/31081202

#SPJ4

Explanation:

đáp án C

Umuhle did not make the first provisional tax payment for the 2021 year of assessment, which may result in penalties and interest. She paid the second provisional tax payment of R8,100 based on an estimated taxable income of R872,762.    

To calculate Umuhle's provisional tax liability and determine if any penalties or interest apply, we need to consider the relevant tax rates and deadlines.

1. Umuhle's taxable income for the 2021 year of assessment was R903,890. As a provisional taxpayer, she should have made two provisional tax payments.

2. The first provisional tax payment is due six months into the tax year, which means Umuhle should have made the payment by 31 August 2021.

3. Umuhle did not make the first provisional tax payment for the 2021 year of assessment.

4. The second provisional tax payment is due at the end of the tax year, which means Umuhle should have made the payment by 28 February 2022.

5. Umuhle paid her second provisional tax payment of R8,100 on 3 March 2022, based on an estimated taxable income of R872,762.

6. Umuhle's final assessed taxable income for the 2022 year of assessment was R999,362, as per her notice of assessment received on 12 October 2022.      

7. Umuhle's employer withheld employees' tax amounting to R244,200 for the 2022 year of assessment.

Based on this information, it appears that Umuhle failed to make the first provisional tax payment for the 2021 year of assessment. This may result in penalties and interest being levied by the tax authorities. It is important for Umuhle to consult with a tax professional or the relevant tax authority to rectify the situation and ensure compliance with the tax obligations.              

Learn more about compliance          

https://brainly.com/question/33500198  

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (b): the bill of rights does not apply to the states. After Engel v. Vitale (1962), the bill of rights applies to the states.

Prior to Engel v. Vitale, the bill of rights did not apply to the states. The Fourteenth Amendment, which was passed in 1868, prohibits the states from violating the rights of individuals; however, the Supreme Court had not applied the provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states until 1962.

Engel v. Vitale (1962) was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that state-mandated prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This case established the doctrine of selective incorporation, which applies the Bill of Rights to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.  

The decision in Engel v. Vitale (1962) had a huge impact on the rights of individuals in the United States. By incorporating the Bill of Rights into state law, the Supreme Court was able to protect individuals from having their rights violated by state governments. This is an important protection for citizens of the United States, as state governments.

Know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/29371683

#SPJ11

Answer: Arbitration Trial

Explanation:

Answer:

Exemplars, tracings

Explanation:

We rlly active

Yes, the Supreme Court should hear the case. The judge and prosecutor were having a romantic relationship which both hid until after the trial. It is no surprise that Hood, the defendant, did not receive a fair trial.

The U.S. Supreme Court needs to review this case to ensure that the constitutional rights of the defendant were protected.The issue before the Supreme Court is the conflict of interest that arose from the romantic affair between the judge and prosecutor. The conflict of interest questions the fairness of the trial and the sentencing of Hood. Therefore, the Supreme Court should hear the case to ensure that the defendant's right to a fair trial was not violated and that justice was served.There are several reasons why the Supreme Court should hear the case of Charles Hood. Firstly, there is a conflict of interest because the judge and the prosecutor were romantically involved. This conflict of interest is a violation of Hood's rights to a fair trial and due process. Therefore, the Supreme Court should hear the case to determine whether the trial was fair and whether the sentencing of Hood was just.Secondly, Hood's right to a fair trial was violated because the romantic affair was kept hidden from the defendant and his attorneys. This means that Hood did not receive a fair trial because the judge and the prosecutor were biased against him. Thus, the Supreme Court should hear the case to ensure that the constitutional rights of the defendant were protected.Finally, the Supreme Court should hear the case to ensure that justice was served. If the judge and the prosecutor were having an affair, then it is possible that they colluded to secure a conviction for Hood. If this is the case, then justice was not served, and the Supreme Court needs to investigate this further.In conclusion, the Supreme Court should hear the case of Charles Hood to ensure that the defendant's right to a fair trial was not violated and that justice was served. The conflict of interest that arose from the romantic affair between the judge and prosecutor calls into question the fairness of the trial and sentencing of Hood. Thus, the Supreme Court needs to review this case to ensure that the constitutional rights of the defendant were protected and that justice was served.

To Know More about fairness visit:

brainly.com/question/30396040

#SPJ11

Energy in the executive is a leading character in the definition of good government. It is essential to the protection of the community against foreign attacks.

To learn more about government from the given link :

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ4

Question

Energy in the executive is a leading character in the definition of good government.

A. it is essential to the protection of the community against foreign attacks

B. it is not less essential to the steady administration of the laws;

C. to the protection of property against those irregular and high-handed combinations which sometimes interrupt the ordinary course of justice;

D. to the security of liberty against the enterprises and assaults of ambition, faction, and of anarchy