Answers
A bench with two or three judges is called a division bench. Each case must be heard by the Divisional bench.
What court has only three judges?The Court of Appeal has only three judges and does not use a jury. The Court of Appeal hears appeals from decisions made by the district courts of the courts located in its districts, as well as decisions on appeals made by federal executive agencies.
What happens in 3rd judge case?The Third Judge Case of 1998 is not a case, but an opinion of the Supreme Court of India on a legal question concerning the university system posed in July 1998 by the President of India, K.R. Narayanan, within the exercise of his constitutional powers.
To learn more about bench of judges visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29548680
#SPJ4
Related Questions
When a Personal Auto policy includes Other Than Collision coverage, physical damage coverage will cover all of the following losses, except:
Answers
When a Personal Auto policy includes Other Than Collision coverage, physical damage coverage will cover all of the following losses, except road harm to tires.
Damage from put on and tear, freezing and mechanical breakdown, and electric breakdown except on account of overall theft of the automobile are excluded in coverage. street damage to tires is likewise excluded. Complete insurance, this affords insurance for damage to your vehicle due to occasions aside from a collision. blanketed losses can include vandalism, hearth, theft, and animal harm, to call some.
Insured car is damaged because of an occasion other than a collision, complete coverage can pay for the damage. This consists of damages from the fireplace, theft, windstorm, flood, and vandalism. if our vehicle is stolen, comprehensive covers transportation and lack of use prices whilst applicable.
damage from put on and tear, freezing and mechanical breakdown, and electric breakdown (except on account of overall theft of the automobile) are excluded. street damage to tires is likewise excluded. all of the following are excluded underneath collision or apart from collision coverages except A) road harm to tires.
Learn more about policy coverage here:-https://brainly.com/question/27015627
#SPJ9
. In late critical criminology, which two interweaving influences have had the most impact?
A. style and resistance
B. neoconservatism and postmodernism
C. chaos and complexity
D. commodification and globalization
Answers
Neoconservatism and postmodernism are the two intertwining trends in late critical criminology that have had the biggest influence.
What is the criminology postmodern theory?A contemporary theory for examining the causes, remedies, and prevention of criminal conduct is the postmodern criminal theory. According to this theory, crime is a social construct that develops as a result of complicated interactions between people who co-produce their surroundings, which in turn reproduces unique behaviours and identities like criminality.
Who is the foremost criminologist of the postmodern era?Though he did not explicitly advocate for it, French philosopher Michel Foucault is widely regarded as one of the most influential proponents of this method.
To know more about criminology visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/14916775
#SPJ1
what is a recent example of gender based violence
Answers
Answer:
female harrasment
Explanation:
an example of gender based violence is female harrasment
how juvenile processes are handled differently in federal courts. In your personal view, should juveniles be prosecuted in federal or state courts
Answers
Answer: both
Explanation:
It would only make sense because it depends on the crime if it such thing as murder it should be federal because it such a huge crime if it small such as shoplifting it should be state because it such a small crime it would be reasonable to have the state decided
T/F: the rules of conduct are never ignored in a conflict.
Answers
The given statement "the rules of conduct are never ignored in a conflict" is True, the rules of conduct are not to be ignored in any conflict, and abiding by them ensures a more effective resolution.
While it may appear that rules of conduct can be disregarded during conflicts, it is essential to understand that there are always underlying principles and guidelines that parties involved should adhere to. These rules ensure that conflicts are resolved in a just, fair, and peaceful manner.
The rules of conduct, which may include legal regulations, ethical guidelines, or organizational policies, help in maintaining professionalism and upholding standards even in the most challenging situations. Ignoring these rules could lead to escalated disputes, loss of credibility, and potential legal consequences.
It is crucial for individuals and organizations to understand the importance of adhering to established rules of conduct during conflicts, as this not only safeguards their interests but also contributes to maintaining a harmonious and productive environment.
In summary, the rules of conduct are not to be ignored in any conflict, and abiding by them ensures a more effective resolution.
To know more about conflict, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30626928#
#SPJ11
Arson fires and, in particular, arson homicides allow for a warrantless crime scene search in most jurisdictions, but it is your experience that a warrant is always better. Instruct your personnel in what the appropriate initiation of the investigation should be. o To avoid issues with evidence collection,
what do you think should be done about the scene? Explain.
Who should be brought in immediately? Why?
• Where should you look for the owner of the property? Why?
Answers
Arson fires and, in particular, arson homicides allow for a warrantless crime scene search in most jurisdictions, but warrants are always better in order to avoid illegal and unauthorized acts by officers due to unnecessary powers.
I would instruct the personnel subordinate to take warrants for the arrest of people unless it is a extraordinary situation and for maintaining public order it is necessary to do warrantless crime scene search. Doing this will improve the quality of investigative operations as warrant caries with it a sense of accountability for the officials. The habitual offenders of the area and security personnel should be brought in immediately as they are the closest suspects of crime in first instance.
For the owners of property, officials should look around the same places to escape as during arson, human instinct allows a person to find the safest place to survive the crisis.
To know more about Arson:
brainly.com/question/11857936
#SPJ1
constitutionally established guarantees that protect citizens, opinions, and propertyagainst arbitrary government interference are known as:
Answers
These guarantees are known as civil rightsare protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights.
Civil rights are protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights, including the right to life, liberty, and property, as well as freedom of speech and assembly, protection against discrimination, and the right to due process. They are designed to prevent government interference with fundamental rights and freedoms, especially those that are essential to a democratic society. Civil rights also provide a platform for citizens to express their opinions without fear of retribution or censorship, and to enjoy the same privileges regardless of their personal characteristics. Civil rights are essential for a democratic society to function, as they ensure that all citizens are treated equally and enjoy their inalienable rights.
Learn more about civil rights. here:
https://brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ4
What were the 2 reasons the US entered WWI?
Answers
Wilson mentioned Germany's violation of its pledge to suspend unrestricted submarine war in the North Atlantic and the Mediterranean, as properly as its attempts to entice Mexico into an alliance towards the United States, as his motives for declaring war.
When did the US enter into WW1?After declaring neutrality in 1914, the United States attempted to stay out of World War I. However, the United States was once unable to stay out of the battle and entered World War I in April 1917.
What function did the U.S. play in figuring out the consequence of WW1?Well, U.S. troops arrived at the european battlefields in time to deliver decisive support on most of the fronts. Thanks to them, the conflict ended notably sooner.
Learn more about WW1 here:
https://brainly.com/question/27400269#SPJ4the u.s. foreign policy illustrated in this cartoon was intended to
Answers
By looking at the image given below, it may be stated that the U.S. Foreign Policy illustrated in the cartoon in order to prevent further European colonization in the west hemisphere. Therefore, the option A holds true.
The European colonization has been ideally seen among the most hot issues of the past few centuries, especially because of the significant events that took place as a result. In a response to the same, a cartoon, as portrayed in the image, was used to indicate that the Europeans must stop colonizing further in the Western Hemisphere.
Learn more about European colonization here:
https://brainly.com/question/12624227
#SPJ4
Missing options and image are added below.
A. prevent further European colonization in the Western Hemisphere
B. deter Spain from inciting revolution in former U.S. colonies
C. encourage European powers to invest in Latin America
D. keep the war between France and Spain from spreading to Latin America
which of these cases determined that an intent to cause harm must be proven for comments on social media to be considered threats? wisconsin v. yoder (1972) tinker v. des moines (1969) elonis v. united states (2015) united states v. windsor (2013)
Answers
The case that determined that an intent to cause harm must be proven for comments on social media to be considered threats is Elonis v. United States (2015).
Elonis v. United States (2015) is the case that specifically addressed the issue of intent in relation to comments made on social media being considered threats. Anthony Elonis, the petitioner in the case, had posted violent and threatening statements on his social media, leading to his arrest and conviction under federal law. The key question before the Supreme Court was whether a subjective intent to threaten was required to classify such statements as true threats, or if an objective standard would suffice.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court held that an intent to cause harm must be proven for comments on social media to be considered threats. The Court emphasized that the First Amendment protection of free speech requires the government to show that the individual making the statements intended to communicate a true threat. Mere recklessness or negligence in making the statements was not sufficient to warrant a criminal conviction, as it would unduly limit freedom of expression. This ruling reaffirmed the importance of protecting individuals' First Amendment rights while recognizing the need to address genuine threats to public safety.
To learn more about Supreme Court click here, brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
Having to do all the work is an example of a(n)
A. disadvantage to society of using authority
B. disadvantage to the user of using authority
C. advantage to society of using authority
D. advantage to the user of using authority
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
, Studio GFF hid your b ok gift but no you don't need to
Which clause of the United States Constitution provides that the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the U.S. constitute the supreme law of the land? Multiple Choice The Fift Amendment Due Process Clouse The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause The Supremacy Clause The Commerce Clause Multipie Choice The Fifh Amendment Due Process Clause The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause The Supremacy Clause The Commerce Clause The Privileges and Immunities Clause
Answers
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution provides that the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the U.S. constitute the supreme law of the land.
The Supremacy Clause is a provision in the United States Constitution that establishes the supremacy of the Constitution itself, federal statutes, and treaties over state law, as well as the supremacy of the federal government over the states. The Clause is based on the idea that a national government that is supreme in its constitutional sphere must be able to act in that sphere without being restricted by laws adopted by individual states.The Supremacy Clause is contained in Article VI of the Constitution. It states that: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
In summary, the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land, meaning that they take precedence over state laws and even state constitutions. It is an essential part of the Constitution that ensures that the federal government can function effectively without being impeded by state laws.
To know more about Constitution visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ11
(Case Study Question) Because Henry has a history of heart disease, he is concerned that his poor health may leave him incapacitated in the future. He would like to give his oldest child the right to make medical decisions if he is so ill he is unable to make them himself. Which of the following documents would accomplish this?
A) Living will
B) Power of appointment
C) Living trust
D) Durable power of attorney for health care (DPOAHC)
Answers
The document that would accomplish Henry's goal of granting his oldest child the right to make medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated is option D) Durable power of attorney for health care (DPOAHC).
A Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care is a legal document that allows an individual (the principal) to designate someone (the agent or attorney-in-fact) to make healthcare decisions on their behalf if they become unable to do so themselves. This document ensures that Henry's wishes regarding his medical treatment and care are respected and followed, even if he is unable to communicate or make decisions.
Unlike a living will, which only specifies a person's preferences for end-of-life care, a DPOAHC grants broader decision-making authority to the designated agent. It allows the agent to make medical decisions in a variety of situations, not just limited to end-of-life care.
By selecting the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care, Henry can ensure that his oldest child has the legal authority to act as his healthcare advocate and make important medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated due to his poor health.
Learn more about attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/31861735
#SPJ4
Question
Refer to the article “The Future of Money” in your Money, Money, Money magazine for a complete version of this text.
How does the author best support the point that there are advantages to using digital currency?
Drag the correct answer into the box.
by describing ways that it can be safer and easier to use than traditional money
by giving opinions about benefits of using cryptocurrency and problems with using cash and credit
by explaining that digital transactions are fastest because they are handled by computers
Answers
The author supports the point by giving opinions on the benefits of using cryptocurrencies and problems with using cash and credit.
What Is Digital Currency?
Digital currency is only available in digital form. It isn't a material object with a physical actuality, unlike plutocrat or other goods like gold or oil painting. By streamlining the current fiscal system, digital plutocrat can grease briskly and more affordable fiscal deals. It may also make it simpler for central banks to apply financial policy.
Cryptocurrencies, digital currencies issued by central banks, and stablecoins are exemplifications of different types of digital plutocrat.
The amicable asset transfer and implicit reduction in sale costs are some benefits of digital currencies.
Digital currencies have some downsides, including the fact that they can be unpredictable to trade and are vulnerable to hacking.
To learn more on Digital currency from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28963893
#SPJ1
which of the following constitutional provisions did the supreme court follow in letting states implement the policy referred to in the opinion?
Answers
The supreme court followed Article 1 - Section 4 in letting states implement the policy referred to in the opinion.
About Supreme Court
The highest court with in federal judiciary of the United States is known as the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). It has final appellate authority over all matters heard in federal courts in the United States as well as state court disputes involving issues of federal law. Additionally, it has exclusive jurisdiction over a certain number of matters, including any cases involving ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls as well as those to which a state shall be a party. The court has the authority to nullify a legislation for disobeying a constitutional requirement through judicial review. Additionally, it has the authority to invalidate presidential orders that contravene either as the Constitution or statutory law.
To know more about supreme court:
brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Voice writing is a new skill in legal work. In a few sentences, explain it, and how it can be accurate to 98 percent.
Answers
Answer: Voice writers can be used to record everything that is said by judges, witnesses, attorneys, and other parties to a proceeding, including gestures and emotional reactions, and either provide real-time feed or prepare transcripts afterwards. Using the voice writing method, a court reporter speaks directly into a stenomask or speech silencer—a hand-held mask containing one or two microphones and voice-dampening materials. As the reporter repeats the testimony into the recorder, the mask prevents the reporter from being heard during testimony.
Hope this helps
firefighting is an example of a government service that could be provided by the private sector. however, firefighting services are operated by the government because .
Answers
Because it is better for society for everyone to have access to firefighting services, the government runs these services.
What are private and government sector services?The area of the frugality that's possessed, run, and managed by government associations is known as the public sector. It offers the general public services including law enforcement, public defense, public transportation, conveyance structure, educational institutions, and health services that contribute to social well- being. The public sector, in discrepancy to the private sector, doesn't aim to turn a profit from its services. The public sector encompasses services offered by tagged officers as well as the associations it finances. It also executes public policy at all situations of government. The outsourcing of services offered to these agencies is also included. Federal, indigenous, and original are the three categories of government services in the public sector.
The area of a country's frugality that's possessed, managed, and controlled by private persons or businesses is known as the private sector. The private sector employs further people than the public sector does and has the ideal of making plutocrat. A new business is established or a public sector company is privatized to produce a private sector reality. Either intimately held or intimately traded, a sizable private establishment is possible.In the private sector, businesses contend for guests' bones by lowering prices for goods and services; in proposition, consumers don't want to pay further for commodity when they can buy the same item away for lower plutocrat.
Learn more about firefighter private sector here:
https://brainly.com/question/7865784
#SPJ4
What major legislation encouraged thousands of immigrants to settle land in the western united states?.
Answers
The primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
What all acts were introduced to set the Western region of the US?It was said that the act was carried out or passed in order to promote economic progress and the expansion of the American West.
It should be noted that the Homestead Act of 1862, which Congress is said to have passed, granted 160 acres of federal land to anyone who would agree to farm the land.
Due to the 160 acres of land that the Homestead Act gave settlers, it is known to have promoted significant migration to the West.
The Homestead Act was therefore a key piece of legislation that encouraged numerous immigrants to buy land in the western United States.
Therefore, the primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
For more information on Homestead Act, refer to the following:
https://brainly.com/question/10390487
#SPJ4
the critical concept that emerged in the palko decision is that of ________ rights.
Answers
Answer:
Double Jeopardy right
Explanation:
This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death
In the case of Fletcher v. Peck the Supreme Court:
a. supported the arguments of the state.
b. could not rule on the constitutionality of state laws.
c. upheld legislative fraud impaired contracts.
d. upheld the sanctity of contracts.
Answers
Answer:
d. upheld the sanctity of contracts.
Explanation:
The case was caused by the fraudulent nature of the Yazoo land sale in Georgia. In 1795, lawyers in Georgia agreed to sell the Yazoo land to about four companies. John Peck was among those who acquired a part of the Yazoo lands. On reselling the land to Robert Fletcher some years later, it was discovered that the Yazoo Land Act had been repealed because the lawyers involved were bribed. Fletcher thus argued in court that because the original Act had been repealed, John Peck had no right to sell the land.
When the case was brought to the United States Supreme court, the judges unanimously upheld the sanctity of contracts stating that the contract was binding despite the fraudulent activities of the lawyers involved. Therefore, the Georgian state did not have the powers to invalidate a contract that had legal backing.
After filing the initial pleadings and motions, the parties gather evidence through a process known as _____. Question 46 options: requests inquisition summary judgments discovery pleadings
Answers
After filing the initial pleadings and motions, the parties gather evidence through a process known as Discovery.
This process is carried out by both parties to gather evidence or facts that may support their respective cases. Discovery is the pretrial process of obtaining evidence from opposing parties and witnesses.
The parties may gather information by interrogatories, requests for the production of documents, and depositions. Discovery serves to narrow the issues in a case and establish facts that will be presented at trial. The process can also help parties assess the strength of their cases and decide whether to settle the matter out of court or proceed to trial.
Discovery is a pretrial process where parties exchange evidence through methods like interrogatories, document requests, and depositions. It helps narrow issues, establish facts, and evaluate the strength of the case.
To learn more about Discovery
https://brainly.com/question/28178921
#SPJ11
The Secret Service was assigned responsibility for protecting the president and his family following the assassination of which U.S. official?
a.President Abraham Lincoln
b.President John F. Kennedy
c.President William McKinley
d.President Ronal Reagan
Answers
Ingmar asks Jessie to contract with Jessie's high school classmates to babysit Ingmar's new baby. Jessie orally agrees to do so. This is
Answers
Answer:
an agency by agreement
Explanation:
Each court has a jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is best defined asa. a doctrine that follows established precedents.b. the geographic area in which a court has the power to apply the law.c. a judicial proceeding to redress a wrong.d. a situation giving a person a right to initiate a judicial proceeding.
Answers
The correct option is B ; The geographic area in which a court has the power to apply the law .
The word "jurisdiction" refers to the legal power granted to a court to try cases and decide on legal matters involving specific sorts of legal claims and/or within a specific geographic region. Power separation. The term "Separation of Powers" was created by 18th century philosopher Montesquieu.
Separation of powers is a paradigm that splits the government into several parts, each with its own set of authorities. Hamilton made his second significant point. To defend such rights, he declared, the court must be granted the authority of JUDICIAL REVIEW to declare unconstitutional laws null and invalid.
Learn more about jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
Written by Alexander Hamilton the the merits of the Electoral College.
THE mode of appointment of the Chief Magistrate of the United States is almost the only part of the system, of any consequence, which has escaped without severe censure, or which has received the slightest mark of approbation from its opponents. The most plausible of these, who has appeared in print, has even deigned to admit that the election of the President is pretty well guarded.1 (Links to an external site.) I venture somewhat further, and hesitate not to affirm, that if the manner of it be not perfect, it is at least excellent. It unites in an eminent degree all the advantages, the union of which was to be wished for.
According to Hamilton, the Electoral College will....
A) Protect America from poor leadership.
B) Protect America from foreign armies.
C) Educate citizens on the election process.
D) Protect the Judicial Branch from the Executive Branch
Answers
Answer:
I think it is C
Explanation:
Sorry if I'm wrong-
which of the following is a moratorium for almost all creditor litigation against a debtor in a chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding?
Answers
A moratorium in the context of Chapter 7 bankruptcy refers to an automatic stay, which is a temporary suspension of creditor litigation against a debtor. When a debtor files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, an automatic stay comes into effect, providing a moratorium on almost all creditor actions, including lawsuits, wage garnishments, and collection calls.
The primary purpose of this moratorium is to provide the debtor with temporary relief from financial pressures and allow the bankruptcy court to fairly distribute the debtor's non-exempt assets among the creditors. During the automatic stay period, the debtor is protected from creditor actions, while the court-appointed bankruptcy trustee reviews the debtor's financial situation and liquidates non-exempt assets to repay creditors.
However, there are some exceptions to the automatic stay. For example, certain types of debt such as alimony, child support, and certain tax obligations are not subject to the moratorium and may still be collected. In addition, creditors may file a motion to lift the automatic stay if they can prove that the stay is causing undue harm to their interests.
In summary, the moratorium in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding is the automatic stay, which temporarily suspends most creditor litigation against the debtor, allowing for an orderly liquidation and distribution of the debtor's non-exempt assets.
Learn more about moratorium here:
https://brainly.com/question/27014633
#SPJ11
Which statement describes an effect of economic dominance on society?
A. Economic dominance encourages education systems to impart moral values to people
B. Economic dominance allows people to spend more time with there families
C. Economic dominance causes education systems to channel there efforts into imparting skills for the job market
D. Economic dominance has led the government to mold its working methods to increase costs
Answers
Answer:
C. Economic dominance causes education systems to channel there efforts into imparting skills for the job market
Explanation:
Can atheists get insurance policies that cover acts of God?
Answers
Answer:
no
Explanation:
nor can relgious people.Most general insurance plans do not cover acts of god.
Answer:
no they will not do in that way hope it's helpful to you and Mark me as brainlist
In general, explain how the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news.
Answers
Answer: In general, the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news by recognizing that the freedom of the press is an essential part of a democratic society. The courts have held that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to gather and disseminate news, and that this right is not limited to members of the traditional news media. However, the courts have also recognized that this right is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the courts have held that journalists may be required to testify in court under certain circumstances, such as when the information they possess is relevant to a criminal investigation. Overall, the courts have generally been supportive of the right to gather news, recognizing its importance to a free and democratic society while also balancing it against other important interests, such as public safety and the administration of justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
Some people think that the First Amendment gives them the right to go anywhere and ask anything in the name of journalism. They believe that they can sneak into private property, record confidential conversations, or demand access to government secrets. Well, the courts have a different opinion. They have ruled that the First Amendment does not grant a special privilege to the press that overrides other laws and rights. They have said that journalists must respect the privacy, property, and security of others, and that they cannot use illegal means to obtain information. The courts have also recognized that some information is legitimately classified or restricted for national security or public safety reasons. So, the next time you see a reporter trying to break into a military base or a celebrity's home, don't be surprised if they end up in jail instead of on the front page.
suppose you wanted to poll citizens of the u.s. and canada to estimate the number of people who caught covid19 in 2021. you do this by first estimating the percentage of population with covid19 and then multiplying that estimate by the population of each country. the u.s. has a population of about 328 million, while canada has a population of about 38 million. other things being equal, how many people would you need to poll in each country so that your level of accuracy in number of people with covid19 was comparable between the two countries? group of answer choices A. more information is needed. B. you should poll the same number of people in the u.s. and canada
C.. you should poll more people in canada. D. you should poll more people in the u.s.
Answers
C. You should poll more people in Canada.
Should the number of people polled differ?To estimate the number of people who caught COVID-19 in the U.S. and Canada in 2021, the accuracy of the estimation depends on the percentage of the population surveyed. Since the population of the U.S. is significantly larger than that of Canada, it is necessary to poll a larger number of people in Canada to achieve a comparable level of accuracy between the two countries.
In this scenario, the U.S. has a population of approximately 328 million, while Canada has a population of around 38 million. When estimating the percentage of the population with COVID-19, sampling a fixed number of individuals in each country would result in a larger relative sample size in the U.S. compared to Canada.
To ensure a comparable level of accuracy in estimating the number of people with COVID-19 in both countries, it is necessary to poll a larger number of people in Canada. This compensates for the smaller population size and helps minimize the potential margin of error in the estimation. By doing so, the statistical representation of the surveyed individuals becomes more proportional to the population, increasing the reliability of the estimated percentages.
Learn more about Sample size determination
brainly.com/question/11129327
#SPJ11