What is an emotional pathos appeal?

Amendatory veto is a veto which allows the governor to send the bill back to the legislature with the message requesting an specific amendment.

About Veto

A legal right to unilaterally halt a government action is known as a veto. A president or monarch vetoing a bill to prevent it from becoming law is the most frequent scenario. The constitution of several nations establishes the right to veto actions. Veto power is also present at various tiers of government, including local, state, and international organisations.

Most vetoes can be overridden, frequently by  the supermajority vote: united states, a presidential veto can be overridden with a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate.

To know more about Veto:

brainly.com/question/4393314

#SPJ4

Preponderance of the evidence standard of proof applies to the competency to stand the trial  :  the  defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.

What do you mean by Preponderance?

It can be defined as one type of evidentiary standard which is majorly used in a burden of proof analysis. In this the whole process revolves around around to prove that something is most likely than not. It is a very strong and important component in proving cases based on law.

is majorly based upon two factors

Hence ,the  defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.

To learn more about Preponderance from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/26765712

#SPJ4

Answer:

Written defamation is libel; oral defamation is slander.

Explanation:

1. Self report studies

2. Emotions

3. Prison overcrowding

4. Power control theory

5. Cognitions

6. Individual and physical

7. Social transformation

Answer:

In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decided that the right to privacy implied in the 14th Amendment protected abortion as a fundamental right. However, the government retained the power to regulate or restrict abortion access depending on the stage of pregnancy.

Explanation:

Answer:

Women received the vote with little effort or opposition. Suffragists’ main strategy was the use of political cartoons. The women’s suffrage movement occurred in isolation from other social

Explanation:

The statement that is true about the rights of women is granted through an amendment in the constitution in the year 1920.

Option C is the correct answer.

The amendment is referring to changing any text or improvising it to make it more clear in the constitution of a country.

In the year 1920, there was an amendment passed that provided women the right to vote in the elections. This happened due to the suffrage movement being led by the National American Suffrage Association and its anti-suffrage activities.

Therefore, the statement described in option C is the correct answer.

Learn more about the amendment in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/8244125

#SPJ2

Answer:

EUMC reaped a substantial profit from its River-walk I investment.

Explanation:

Answer:

acfel

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

absolutely not

Answer:

Explanation:

yeah technically its legal

Plessy v. Ferguson, a legal case in which the United States Supreme Court, by a seven-to-one majority advanced the contentious "separate but equal" theory for determining the constitutionality of racial segregation statutes on May 18, 1896.

Plessy v. Ferguson was the first important case to consider the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment's (1868) equal-protection provision, which prevents states from refusing "equal protection of the laws" to anybody within their borders.

The majority ruling, which did not use the slogan "separate but equal," gave constitutional approval to statutes that segregated the public services and facilities available to African Americans and Whites on the basis of race.

To know more about U.S supreme court, you can visit the link below :

https://brainly.com/question/224703

#SPJ4

The primary purpose of Tort law is to a) recognize duty of care and c) compensate an injured party.

A tort is a wrongful act that results in injury or damage to someone or their property. It may be committed intentionally or unintentionally. Tort law is a legal system that provides remedies for people who have been harmed by the wrongful actions of others.

There are several goals of tort law, but the primary ones are:

Recognition of the duty of care: Tort law recognizes that people have a duty of care to others, which means they are responsible for not causing harm to them. This duty can arise in a variety of situations, such as driving a car, operating heavy machinery, or providing professional advice. Tort law aims to ensure that people take this duty seriously and are held accountable when they breach it.

Compensation of injured parties: Tort law also seeks to compensate people who have been injured or suffered losses due to the wrongful actions of others. This compensation can take many forms, such as payment of medical expenses, lost wages, or compensation for pain and suffering. The aim is to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred. This goal is often achieved through monetary compensation, but other remedies may be available as well, such as injunctions or orders to perform specific actions.

Remedial: Tort law is also remedial. Its primary aim is to provide a remedy to the aggrieved party and not to punish the wrongdoer. The law of tort seeks to ensure that an individual who has suffered a harm is adequately compensated for his losses and that similar situations do not occur in the future. In other words, the primary goal of tort law is to restore the injured party to the position he or she was in before the tort occurred. Punishing the wrongdoer is not the primary goal of tort law.

Therefore, the correct answer is  a) recognize duty of care and c) compensate an injured party.

Learn more about Tort law here: https://brainly.com/question/28213050

#SPJ11

Under crime insurance, the person who is not considered a custodian is the C. Partner.

In crime insurance, a custodian typically refers to individuals who have physical control or responsibility over the insured property. They are entrusted with the care, custody, and control of the property. The purpose of crime insurance is to protect against losses resulting from criminal acts such as theft, embezzlement, or forgery.

Among the options given, a sales clerk, janitor, and named insured can all be considered custodians depending on their roles and responsibilities. A sales clerk may handle merchandise, a janitor may have access to the premises, and a named insured may have control over the insured property.

However, a partner is not typically categorized as a custodian in the context of crime insurance. Partners usually have an ownership interest in the business rather than direct custodial responsibilities.

To know more about crime insurance

brainly.com/question/32156541

#SPJ11

It can be argued that imposing monetary penalties that also affect the quality of life of family members may raise ethical concerns.

When monetary penalties are imposed, it is important to consider the potential impact on the well-being of not just the individual responsible for the penalty, but also their family members. Financial penalties can have ripple effects on a family's ability to meet their basic needs, maintain their standard of living, and access essential resources and services. In situations where the penalty significantly reduces the family's income or resources, it can result in hardship and negatively affect their quality of life.

However, the fairness of imposing such penalties depends on various factors, including the nature and severity of the offense, the ability of the individual to pay, and the intent behind the penalty. It is important for policymakers and authorities to consider alternative measures that minimize the potential impact on innocent family members while still ensuring accountability for the responsible individual. Additionally, implementing support systems and resources to assist affected families can help mitigate the potential negative consequences.

Overall, the fairness of imposing monetary penalties that affect family member quality of life requires a careful balance between accountability and the protection of innocent parties. Striking a balance that considers the broader impact on families can contribute to a more equitable and just approach to addressing penalties and their consequences.

For more such answers on ethical concerns

https://brainly.com/question/28340480

#SPJ8

Answer:

What

Explanation:

Answer:

Situation of Human Rights in South Asia

Along with some of the oldest civilizations in the world, South Asia includes some of its poorest countries. Civil war, ethnic tension, religious persecution and terrorism are but some of the ailments of this region, as are the abuse of government power, censorship, and human rights violation.  

Explanation:

*Hope this helps*

The correct answer to the question about distracted driving is: d. Other drivers must react more quickly.

When a driver is distracted, they may react slower to changes in traffic conditions, such as a car suddenly stopping or a pedestrian crossing the road. This can require other drivers on the road to react more quickly in order to avoid a collision.

Regarding the question about the drop in traffic fatalities per mile traveled in the US between 1970 and 1990, the generally accepted reason is: c. Seat belt use increased.

Learn more about driving on

https://brainly.com/question/1071840

#SPJ1

The statement is false because there is no legal basis for denying custody to a parent solely based on their lifestyle choices.

As long as a parent is able to provide a safe and stable environment for their child, their personal choices and behavior are not relevant to the custody decision. However, if a parent's lifestyle choices put the child in danger or negatively impact their well-being, such as substance abuse or criminal behavior, it may be considered in the custody decision.

Ultimately, the best interests of the child are the top priority in custody cases, and factors such as the ability to provide for the child's physical and emotional needs, and the parent-child relationship, are given more weight than lifestyle choices.

Learn more about lifestyle https://brainly.com/question/31234440

#SPJ11

In the Hustler Magazine v. Moral Majority case, the court's decision was in favor of the defendant, ruling that the Moral Majority's use of the Hustler parody ad was fair use. The court determined that the ad was transformative in nature, using the original work to criticize and comment on the political views of Hustler's publisher, Larry Flynt. As a result, the use of the parody ad did not infringe on Hustler's copyright.The court's decision in this case is generally seen as a victory for the fair use doctrine and free speech. It reaffirmed that parody is a legitimate form of expression and that the use of copyrighted material for the purpose of parody does not necessarily constitute infringement. While some may have disagreed with the moral or political message conveyed by the parody ad, the court recognized that such criticism and commentary is an important part of the public discourse.In conclusion, I agree with the court's decision in this case. The parody ad was clearly transformative in nature and did not compete with the original work. Instead, it used the original work to comment on a matter of public concern. As such, it was a legitimate exercise of free speech and did not infringe on Hustler's copyright.

For more question like Court Decision visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/28038485

#SPJ11

The techniques or the rules that are used to interpret statutes are very necessary given the fact that they help to justify the decisions that are made by the judges that preside over cases.

The term statute has to do with the enactment that is established by the legislative arm of a nation as a legal document that has to do with the ways that the policies of the nation would have to be carried out as well as the laws and the regulations that are necessary in the area.

The use of statutes is very necessary because it is wha tis used to decide cases by the law courts. The judge would have to base jis decisions based on what the law expects him to do at the moment.

It is necessary to know the statutes so that a person would be able to know the true meaning of the terms that are contained in that statutes.

Read more on government statutes here: https://brainly.com/question/860014

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer is a.

People help each other.

I hope this is helpful!

The above statement is true.

Christ's first advent was when He entered this world as a real human being to rescue sinful mankind. He is the only begotten Son of God.

The Old Testament is the first part of the Bible, and it begins with the creation of the Earth, continues with Noah and the deluge, Moses, and other events, and ends with the expulsion of the Jews to Babylon. The Hebrew Bible, which has its roots in the antiquity of Judaism, is extremely similar to the Old Testament of the Bible.

A few Old Testament prophecies speak about Christ's first advent, when He was born as a person. Others focus on the second advent, which mentioned Messiah's greatest victory.

To learn more about Christianity see:

https://brainly.com/question/855630

#SPJ4

According to the question the obligation to perform acts already required is known as a duty.

An obligation refers to a moral or legal duty that an individual or entity is bound to fulfill. It is a responsibility or commitment that one is obliged to meet, often stemming from social norms, laws, contracts, or personal agreements.
In a legal context, obligations are enforceable and carry legal consequences if not fulfilled. They arise from contractual agreements, statutory requirements, or judicial rulings. For example, when individuals enter into a lease agreement, they have an obligation to pay rent and maintain the property as specified in the contract.

To learn more about obligation
https://brainly.com/question/32069276
#SPJ11

Answer:

The States Reorganisation Commission constituted by the Central Government of India on 22 December 1953 to recommend the reorganisation of state boundaries. In 1955, after nearly two years of study, the Commission recommended that India's state boundaries should be reorganised to form 14 states and 6 territories.

Explanation:

:)

The Democratic Peace thesis is a theory in international relations that suggests democracies are less likely to go to war with each other than non-democracies.

There are several explanations for this phenomenon, including normative explanations.

Normative explanations for the Democratic Peace thesis focus on the values and beliefs that are inherent in democratic societies.

According to this view, democracies are less likely to go to war with each other because they share common values and norms that promote peaceful conflict resolution.

For example, democracies are founded on the principles of popular sovereignty, individual rights, and the rule of law.

These values encourage democratic societies to pursue peaceful means of conflict resolution and to respect the sovereignty of other democratic nations.

learn more about conflict here :

https://brainly.com/question/17085630

#SPJ11

According to the National Safety Council, drivers should search at least 12-15 seconds ahead of their vehicle for an open path of travel. This means that drivers should be aware of potential hazards, such as traffic congestion or pedestrians crossing the road, well before they reach them.

By scanning the road ahead, drivers can anticipate potential problems and plan accordingly, whether that means slowing down or changing lanes. This also gives drivers more time to react if something unexpected happens, such as a vehicle suddenly braking or an animal running across the road. In addition to searching ahead for an open path of travel, drivers should also be aware of their surroundings, including vehicles on either side of them and behind them. By being aware of all potential hazards, drivers can better control their vehicles and avoid accidents.

To know more about National Safety

https://brainly.com/question/29553303

#SPJ11

Drug courts have become a popular alternative to traditional criminal justice methods for addressing drug-related offenses.

However, a "tug of war" has emerged between criminal justice professionals over the effectiveness of these courts.

Supporters argue that drug courts provide a more therapeutic approach that focuses on treating addiction rather than simply punishing offenders.

Opponents, on the other hand, argue that drug courts are too lenient and allow offenders to avoid jail time and accountability for their actions.

Additionally, some argue that the strict requirements and conditions placed on participants can actually be counterproductive and lead to high rates of failure. Ultimately, the debate over drug courts highlights the ongoing tension between punishment and rehabilitation within the criminal justice system.

Learn more about drug courts at

https://brainly.com/question/29892889

#SPJ11

The kind of Criminal that Xavier is going to be classified as going by this narrative is a persistent thief.

This is a person that is known to continue stealing people's properties even though they have been successful before.

Unlike the professional thief, they do not steal in order to get paid. They continue in crime even though they may have tried to stop.

Read more on  thieves here: https://brainly.com/question/26019827

Answer: most likely Procedural Due Process

Explanation:

and if they dong evidence that he stole u can also file for false accusation which can be used when a claim or allegation of wrongdoing that is untrue and/or otherwise unsupported by facts.