Answer:
separate but equal
Explanation:
Brown famously overturned the 1896 case of Plessy v. Ferguson, in which a very different Supreme Court blessed the segregationist doctrine of “separate but equal” as constitutional.
Four common types of distractions are
A. food, drink, interesting topics, and loud noises
B. teenagers, vehicles, construction, and stop lights
C. tech, personal, passenger, and emotional
D. food, tech, passenger, and emotional
Answer:
A. All these are sources of distractions. A delicious food, a tasty drink, an engrossing topics and noise pollution
What does voir dire mean? A. Jury selection B. Plea bargain C. Probable cause or D. Motions
Answer:
A- jury selection
Explanation:
What female was a veteran
Explanation:
grace Murray hooper
Bea Arthur
Betty white
grace hopper
Why do you think the ASVAB test is required by some branches in order to enter the military?
Is it enough to be "suspected" of terrorism, or should these suspects have the right to a fair trial before being detained indefinitely?
Answer:
Suspects must have a trial before being detained indefinitely.
Explanation:
Suspects of terrorism must be detained immediately, as a measure of security and disaster prevention, since terrorist acts tend to be gradual and involve causing terror and deaths in the population.
However, in order for this suspect to be detained indefinitely, there needs to be a fair trial where evidence will be analyzed that places this suspect as guilty or innocent, making his arrest or freedom justified.
Answer:
Well, obviously the cops would need some sort of reason to arrest these people before detaining them, not just because they may seem “suspicious”. I do believe that they must have a fair trial before being detained permanently because the police may not have any sort of theory or evidence just suspicion and that is not enough.
Explanation:
Compared to driving at 20 mph, about how much longer will it take for you to stop at 60 mph?
Answer:
It depends on your rate of acceleration
Explanation:
What are accounting concepts? Explain any 2 of them.
Why is DNA profiling considered a valid means of identification? Describe the structure of DNA. How does DNA relate to genes and chromosomes?
DNA profiling uses the unique sequences of DNA in an individual's genome to identify them
Why DNA profiling considered a valid means of identificationDNA profiling is considered a valid means of identification because it is based on the fact that every individual has a unique DNA profile, except for identical twins. Therefore, analyzing the DNA present in a biological sample such as blood, saliva, or hair can provide a definitive match to a particular individual, as long as their DNA is in the database.
The structure of DNA is a double helix, consisting of two strands of nucleotides that are twisted around each other. Each nucleotide is composed of a sugar, a phosphate group, and one of four nitrogenous bases: adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), or thymine (T). The nitrogenous bases pair up in a specific way - A with T and C with G - to form the rungs of the DNA ladder.
Therefore, DNA profiling uses the unique sequences of DNA in an individual's genome to identify them. This is possible because of the vast amount of genetic variation present in the human population, which allows for the identification of even minor differences between individuals' DNA profiles.
Learn more about DNA at https://brainly.com/question/21992450
#SPJ1
6. There is a hunt for someone who has been committing violent crimes all throughout a county. Law enforcement have gathered evidence at every scene and attempted to find the perpetrator, with
no result. They ask Renaldo to look at the previous crimes, hoping that by looking at the facts of those crimes, he might give them some insight as to the person who is committing them. What
category would Renaldo's career MOST closely fall into?
Answer:
Law and public safety, and in more detail, Investigation.
There is a hunt for someone who has been committing violent crimes all throughout the county. The criminology category would Renaldo's career most closely falls into is committing them.
What is the evidence?However, there is a difference between evidence and proof. Evidence is information or facts that help us determine if something is real or even exists. A claim can be proven by a body of supporting data. A conclusion that a certain fact is true or false is called proof.
The study of crime and criminal conduct is known as criminology, and it is based on sociological and other non-legal principles as well as those of psychology, economics, statistics, and anthropology. Criminologists look into a number of related fields, such as Criminals tend to have certain traits.
Therefore, By the criminology category would commit violent crimes all throughout a county.
Learn more about evidence here:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ5
i don't need help but why do you need to pay for pemium
Answer:because the people are greedy and want more money they cant just help lol
Explanation:
Please provide an example of each stage of Lawrence Kohlberg's Moral Development Theory in either a single event or separate events for each stage in your scenario (which may be factual or fictional);
1.) Pre-conventional
2.) Conventional
3.) Post-conventional
Answer:
Pre-conventional:
Samantha, a 5-year-old girl, sees her younger sister crying because she can't find her favorite toy. Samantha decides to take the toy and give it to her sister, not because she feels bad for her sister, but because she wants to avoid punishment from her parents.
Conventional:
John, a 25-year-old man, believes that it's important to obey the law because it's necessary for society to function properly. He follows traffic rules, pays his taxes on time, and does not cheat on exams, because he believes it's the right thing to do.
Post-conventional:
Anna, a 35-year-old woman, works as a human rights lawyer. She believes that there are universal ethical principles that should guide people's actions, even if they conflict with the law. Anna is willing to engage in civil disobedience to challenge unjust laws and promote social justice, even if it means risking arrest or imprisonment.
What were the purpose and the first attempt The Albany Plan
What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? (Select all that apply.) Responses To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct by preventing the use of illegally obtained evidence during a criminal trial.
What is evidence?Evidence is any type of proof that is used to support a claim or conclusion. It can be physical, such as an object or document, or it can be testimonial, such as a witness providing a statement. Evidence is often used in legal proceedings to prove a point of law or fact. It can also be used in scientific research to support or refute a hypothesis. Evidence can also be used in everyday life to support an argument or decision. In any situation, evidence should be reliable, relevant, and sufficient to support the claim or conclusion.
This rule ensures that police do not arrest people without a legal cause, that evidence is collected legally, and that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. Additionally, it ensures that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
To learn more about evidence
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ1
In general what three elements must be shown by a prosecutor to convict an accused person of a crime
Answer:
In general, every crime involves three elements: first, the act or conduct (“actus reus”); second, the individual's mental state at the time of the act (“mens rea”); and third, the causation between the act and the effect (typically either "proximate causation" or "but-for causation").
One of the mistakes that was made in both the JonBenet Ramsey and Lizzie Borden cases was:
A. suspects were not interviewed
B. crime scene was not closed down
C. ransom notes were mishandled
D. no evidence was collected
Answer:B
Explanation:
Multiple civilians came into both crime scenes.
What would happen if people didn’t defending the nation
The courts can adjust the penalties in lawsuits to reflect the fact that
infringements may be
A. willful
B. helpful
C. unintentional
D. desired
Answer:
C. unintentional
Explanation:
A changing space is a space or area condition in which the level of risk is increasing. True false
Changing space is a space or area condition in which the level of risk is increasing. The statement is True.
Determine the likelihood that a person may require more extensive support, residential placement away from the natural family home or support within the natural home. This is known as the level of risk. A standardized risk assessment tool is used by DDDS to determine the level of risk.
The word "level of risk" refers to how big a risk is when combined with the likelihood of its outcomes. The term "level of risk" refers to the size of a risk as reflected by a risk priority number.
Learn more about the level of risk here:
https://brainly.com/question/14378278
#SPJ1
write the importance orruce or law
The importance of law is the based on the safety, rights, and the punishment of the crime.
What is law?The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national.
The law is founded on protecting our general safety and ensuring our rights as citizens from abuses through other people, organizations, and the government itself.
As a result, the importance of law is the based on the safety, rights, and the punishment of the crime.
Learn more about on law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
state six emergency situation with the group that manages it
Answer:
Fire, Fire department.
Entity traped, Fire department.
Medical emergency, Hospital.
Theft, Police.
Murder, Police.
Wrecks. Firedepartment, Police, Hospital.
Explanation:
Brainliest?
PLEASE EXPLAIN THE TERRIBLE V TERRIBLE SUPREME COURT CASE TO ME I DON’T GET IT OLEASE EXPLAIN IT IN AN EASY WAY THANK YOUUUU
The case is about legal dispute between a divorced couple over distribution of property where the ex-wife claimed that her ex-husband's gambling winnings should be considered community property.
What is the Terrible v. Terrible case about?In the Terrible v. Terrible case, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that gambling winnings can be considered community property if the gambling activity is considered a form of marital property.
The court found that since the ex-husband's gambling winnings were generated during the marriage and with the use of community property, the ex-wife was entitled to a portion of the winnings.
The decision established a precedent in Nevada that gambling winnings can be considered community property in certain circumstances.
Read more about State cases
brainly.com/question/29547496
#SPJ1
Suppose that you are one of New Mexico representatives to the US House of Representatives explain the steps that you would take to pass a law to benefit your state. 50 points!
After being introduced to the House or Senate, a bill is allocated to a committee. If the panel approves the measure, it then moves to the floor for discussion and a vote.
The senator or congressman who promotes the measure could introduce it in any body of Congress. A bill is given to a committee when it comes to light, and the members of the committee will study, debate, and alter the measure.
A bill constitutes a law and is carried out by the administration if it gets approved by the President as well as the American House od Representatives, and the U.S. Senate, or if a presidential veto has been overruled.
Learn more about Senate, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15321724
#SPJ1
Answer: Any member can introduce a piece of legislation. Once a bill is signed by the President or his veto is overridden by both houses it becomes a law and is assigned an official number. When the House or the Senate passes a bill it is referred to the other chamber where it usually follows the same route through committee and floor action. This chamber may approve the bill as received, reject it, ignore it, or amend it before passing it. A legislative proposal that if passed by both the House and the Senate and approved by the President becomes law.
Explanation:
The series of 13 trials that brought Nazi war criminals to justice are known as what?
Options: International Human Rights Law
The Hague
International Criminal Court
Nuremberg Trials
Answer:
The Nurenberg Trials composed of 13 trials.
What issues does article 1 of the constitution deal with
Answer:
Article I describes the design of the legislative branch of US Government -- the Congress. Important ideas include the separation of powers between branches of government (checks and balances), the election of Senators and Representatives, the process by which laws are made, and the powers that Congress has.
This chapter discusses that drug use can have both positive and negative results, depending on how it is used and why. Do you think a drug that is currently illegal but is found to have some positive results in the medical field should be completely
outlawed for any type of use? Think of heroin or cocaine, it is illegal to use or possess in the U.S. but if something positive could come from the use do you think it should be allowed. Explain your answer. 2 cited sources.
I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, but I can provide a balanced perspective on the topic. The question of whether a currently illegal drug with potential medical benefits should be completely outlawed for any type of use is a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach.
On one hand, it is important to consider the potential benefits that such drugs can have in the medical field. For example, studies have shown that heroin-assisted treatment can be an effective option for treating opioid addiction (Kerr et al., 2017). Similarly, cocaine has been used as a local anesthetic in eye surgery and is still used in some countries for that purpose (Narvaez, 2014). Banning the use of these drugs outright may prevent patients from receiving effective treatment for their medical conditions.
On the other hand, legalizing drugs with a history of abuse and addiction carries significant risks. It may lead to increased availability, misuse, and addiction, especially among vulnerable populations such as teenagers and low-income individuals. Additionally, drug legalization may send the wrong message to society that drug use is acceptable and may lead to an increase in crime rates, accidents, and public health costs.
In conclusion, while the potential medical benefits of currently illegal drugs should be considered, the risks of legalization should also be carefully evaluated. A thorough analysis of the benefits and risks, as well as the potential impact on public health and safety, should guide any decision regarding drug policy.
Make a list of the top 10 powers that Congress has
Answer:
Congress has the power to:
Make laws
Declare war
Raise and provide public money and oversee its proper expenditure
Impeach and try federal officers
Approve presidential appointments
Approve treaties negotiated by the executive branch
Oversight and investigations
Establish laws of naturalization.
Grant copyrights and patents.
Create lower federal courts.
Explanation:
Jordan estimated the length of a pen to be 23 cm. When he measured it, he discovered
that the actual length of the pen is 22 cm. Which of these is closest to the percent error
for Jordan's measurement?
a. 4.3%
b.
4.5%
c. 95.7%
d. 104.5%
Answer:
I think that it's c
Explanation:
What is the difference between bias and perspective, if there is a difference, and how can/should they be handled differently?
Bias and perspective are two terms that are often used interchangeably but they are slightly different. Bias is an inclination that someone has towards a certain idea or opinion based on preconceived notions or a personal opinion. Perspective is how someone views a specific situation, which is based on a combination of many influences including beliefs, values, and experiences.
Bias should be handled by listening to the argument of others nonjudgmentally, understanding the evidence that is being presented, and striving to make unbiased decisions or conclusions. Perspective is best handled by actively listening and considering the ideas of others without judgement, then working together to reach an opinion that is inclusive of all perspectives.
Examine the group of photos shown on page 347. For each photo, answer te following questions:
Is this family? Why or why not?
Is this living arrangement common where you live?
How does the law affect this living arrangement?
What are the characteristics of a family? How would you define the term family?
Are divorced spouses still a family? Would you answer differently depending on whether they have children? If a parent remarries?
A family is any two or more people who live together and are connected by blood, marriage, or adoption; all of these people are regarded as belonging to the same family.
What is the role of the family?Families have a key role in social development as the fundamental and indispensable building blocks of society. They are primarily responsible for the upbringing, education, and socialization of children as well as for teaching civic virtues and a sense of community.
Family supports us during both the best and worst of times, which makes these ties crucial. Family is crucial because it can provide unconditional love, support, and stability. They always strive to see and bring out the best in you, even when you are unable to do so for yourself.
Learn more about a family here:
https://brainly.com/question/10205802
#SPJ1
in Bush v. gore the Supreme Court ruled that?
a:the electoral College could not decide a presidential election
b:florid needed to end its recount of presidential votes
c: no court had the power to influence a presidential election
d: florida had to give up its electoral votes in the next election
Answer:
B
Explanation:
If they found out in the recount they would've found out that bush lost