Answers
Presidents can direct the executive branch of government to carry out their wishes by issuing an executive order.
What circumstances would a President utilise an executive order?In order to avoid the red tape of Congress and forward political goals without going through the legislative process, the President may issue an executive order. Despite not having the same formal requirements as an executive order, an executive memorandum is similar to one.
Who supervises how the President uses executive orders?Although the judicial branch has the authority to do so, the executive branch has the power to announce Executive Orders, which are similar to proclamations and have legal force.
To learn more about Executive Order here:
https://brainly.com/question/29544900
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Which problem has been found recently in the system of special districts?a. State investigations have discovered numerous "phantom districts" that do not provide a service, yet bill the local counties for administrative costs.b. Some districts have dealt with people buying property just outside the district boundaries and then demanding services from the district without having to pay for them.c. There has been widespread corruption among board members receiving bribes from citizens to lower their user fees.d. Real estate developers have moved a few people onto land, rent free, who then vote for huge bond measures that future residents are obliged to pay.e. The special districts for homeland security throughout Texas were uncoordinated and ill- prepared for September 11, 2001.
Answers
The problem that has been found recently in the system of special districts is a. State investigations have discovered numerous "phantom districts" that do not provide a service, yet bill the local counties for administrative costs.
In recent times, state investigations have uncovered the existence of special districts that are labeled as "phantom districts." These districts do not actually provide any services to the local communities but still bill the counties for administrative costs. This discovery has raised concerns about the misuse of public funds and the lack of accountability within the special district system.
These phantom districts create an unfair burden on the local counties as they are required to allocate resources for administrative expenses without receiving any corresponding services in return. This problem highlights the need for increased transparency, oversight, and stricter regulations to prevent such fraudulent practices within the special district framework.
learn more about bill here
https://brainly.com/question/15266436
#SPJ11
1. describe with some detail at least two pieces of evidence (witness testimony, investigation reports, etc.) presented at willingham’s trial. answer here (5 points):
Answers
Two pieces of evidence presented at Cameron Todd Willingham's trial are Witness testimony and Investigation reports.
Witness testimony: The prosecution called several witnesses to testify about the fire, including firefighters, neighbors, and a jailhouse informant.
The firefighters testified that they found evidence of arson at the scene of the fire, including a "V-pattern" charring on the floor and a lack of smoke damage on the outside of the house.
The neighbors testified that they heard Willingham arguing with his wife and daughters on the night of the fire. The jailhouse informant testified that Willingham had confessed to him that he had set the fire.
Investigation reports: The prosecution also presented several investigation reports, including a report from the Texas Fire Marshal's Office and a report from the State Fire Marshal's Office.
The reports concluded that the fire was intentionally set and that Willingham was the most likely suspect.
The defense presented its own witnesses and experts, who disputed the prosecution's claims. The defense witnesses testified that the fire was accidental and that there was no evidence of arson.
The defense experts also criticized the investigation reports, saying that they were flawed and that the conclusions were not supported by the evidence.
The jury found Willingham guilty of capital murder and sentenced him to death. He was executed by lethal injection in 2004.
In the years since Willingham's execution, there has been growing evidence that he was innocent.
Several independent investigations have concluded that the fire was accidental and that Willingham was wrongfully convicted. In 2014, the Texas Forensic Science Commission issued a report that found that the arson investigation used to convict Willingham was flawed.
The report also found that the jailhouse informant's testimony was unreliable.
Despite the evidence of Willingham's innocence, his conviction remains in place. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has refused to review the case, and the governor of Texas has refused to grant clemency.
To know more about Cameron Todd Willingham's trial, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/18598095#
#SPJ11
What agency(ies) and regulation(s) govern advertising of consumer products such as bottled water? What is the purpose of consumer protection as it relates to truthful advertising? What are the consequences for non-compliance with federal and/or state regulations (students should use their own state of residence regulations) around consumer products and services? What recommendations would you offer that comply with regulations and could still promote the product for the company?
Answers
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
The government agency that regulates advertising of consumer products such as bottled water is the FDA, The Food and Drug Administration.
What is the purpose of consumer protection as it relates to truthful advertising?
The purpose is that companies really and truthfully inform American consumers over the components of the food or medicines they are about to take. It is of the utmost importance that the American people are informed and protected when they are consuming food or medicines, so they know what they are having.
What are the consequences for non-compliance with federal and/or state regulations around consumer products and services?
FDA has the power to enforce its regulations nationwide. If companies do not comply, the FDA can enforce the regulations and companies have to pay fines from 100,000 to more than 250,000 dollars.
What recommendations would you offer that complies with regulations and could still promote the product for the company?
My recommendation is that companies are honest when making advertisements to promote their products. Many times, companies lie to attract more consumers to defeat their competitors, cheating the people on some benefits that are not true.
That is not honest or ethical.
Clear communication and honesty is my best advice.
What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments? If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?
Answers
I believe the interview of Richard Clarke was meaningful as he gave some in-depth knowledge of what is happening in the Department of Homeland Security.
Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments?Yes he does because he stated that due to the reason of the White House not nominating the senior managers to replace those who were said to have left. the homeland security is said to be leaderless.
If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?If I had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, i will chose to keep it the same as it is the right thing to do, splitting will lead to more cost. The best thing is keeping it the same and appointment of leadership head.
Therefore, I believe the interview of Richard Clarke was meaningful as he gave some in-depth knowledge of what is happening in the Department of Homeland Security.
Learn more about Homeland Security from
https://brainly.com/question/850432
#SPJ1
When creating a budget, why would savings be considered an expense?
Answers
Since budgeting allows you to create a spending plan for your money, it ensures that you will always have enough money for the things you need and the things that are important to you. Following a budget or spending plan will also keep you out of debt or help you work your way out of debt if you are currently in debt.
Hope my answer helps uh ✌️
child support
child support laws in Washington
Answers
which of the following statements is not true regarding a presentence investigation (psi)?
Answers
The following statement is not true regarding a presentence investigation (PSI).
A presentence investigation (PSI) is a comprehensive assessment conducted by probation officers or other authorized individuals to gather information about an offender before sentencing. It is used to provide the court with relevant information to make an informed decision regarding the appropriate sentence for the convicted individual. The PSI report typically includes details about the offender's personal and criminal history, social and family background, employment and education, substance abuse history, and any other relevant factors.
Based on this understanding, the statement "The PSI is conducted after the sentencing decision has been made" is not true. In reality, a PSI is conducted before the sentencing decision. The purpose of the PSI is to assist the court in making an appropriate and fair sentencing decision by providing a comprehensive understanding of the offender's background and circumstances. It is an essential step in the sentencing process that helps ensure that the punishment fits the crime and considers the individual's specific circumstances.
To learn more about PSI visit:
brainly.com/question/32062309
#SPJ11
How was stare decisis used/not used in this case? What were the main holdings of this case? Do you agree with the court’s reasoning in arriving at the decision? Why or why not? Do you think the result was appropriate given the facts? Why or why not? g
Answers
In this case, the court had used the doctrine of stare decisis to reach a verdict. The verdict of the court was a landmark decision that was widely debated.
In the case of Brown v. Board of Education, stare decisis was used to arrive at the verdict. The court rejected the precedent set in Plessy v. Ferguson and held that segregation in schools was unconstitutional. The main holding of the case was that segregation in schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The court reasoned that the separate but equal doctrine established in Plessy was inherently unequal and perpetuated the notion of racial inferiority.
The court's reasoning in arriving at the decision was sound. Segregation in schools was not equal, and it did not provide black students with the same opportunities as their white counterparts.
The separate but equal doctrine was a facade that allowed white supremacy to continue. The court's decision was appropriate given the facts. It was time to end segregation in schools and provide equal opportunities for all students regardless of their race.
Learn more about doctrine from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/30613074
#SPJ11
I will give brainliest if your correct.
Answers
Answer d
Explanation:
D: A democracy is where the people make chocies not powerful people.
Why are techniques or rules to interpret the meaning of statutes necessary?
Answers
The techniques or the rules that are used to interpret statutes are very necessary given the fact that they help to justify the decisions that are made by the judges that preside over cases.
What is a statute?The term statute has to do with the enactment that is established by the legislative arm of a nation as a legal document that has to do with the ways that the policies of the nation would have to be carried out as well as the laws and the regulations that are necessary in the area.
The use of statutes is very necessary because it is wha tis used to decide cases by the law courts. The judge would have to base jis decisions based on what the law expects him to do at the moment.
It is necessary to know the statutes so that a person would be able to know the true meaning of the terms that are contained in that statutes.
Read more on government statutes here: https://brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ1
2. Explain How Cultural Stereotypes
Can Negatively Influence Decision I
Making in Criminal Justice Settings
Answers
Answer:
Cultural stereotypes are generalizations or assumptions people make about individuals or groups based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or other cultural characteristics. These stereotypes can hurt decision-making in criminal justice settings, such as during police investigations, jury selection, and sentencing.
One of the ways that cultural stereotypes can negatively influence decision-making is through racial profiling. Police officers may make assumptions about individuals based on their race or ethnicity, leading to unfair treatment, such as being stopped and searched without cause or being treated with more suspicion than other individuals.
Cultural stereotypes can also impact jury selection and the verdicts that are reached. Jurors may hold biases or assumptions about individuals based on their cultural background, which can lead to wrongful convictions or acquittals. For example, a juror may assume that a defendant from a certain cultural background is likelier to commit a certain crime, even if there is no evidence to support this claim.
In addition, cultural stereotypes can impact sentencing decisions. Judges may have preconceived notions about individuals based on their cultural background, which can lead to harsher or more lenient sentences. For example, a judge may believe that a defendant from a specific cultural background is more likely to be violent and, therefore may impose a harsher sentence than they would for someone from a different background who committed the same crime.
Cultural stereotypes can negatively influence decision-making in criminal justice settings by leading to unfair treatment, wrongful convictions, and unequal sentencing. Criminal justice professionals need to be aware of these biases and work to mitigate their impact on decision-making. This can include education and training on cultural competence and efforts to increase diversity and representation within the criminal justice system.
Cultural stereotypes can have a detrimental impact on decision-making in criminal justice settings due to the biases they create. These stereotypes are preconceived notions or generalizations about individuals based on their race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or other cultural factors.
When these stereotypes influence decision-making in the criminal justice system, several negative consequences can occur:
1. Racial Profiling: Cultural stereotypes can lead to racial profiling, where law enforcement officers or other criminal justice professionals target individuals from specific racial or ethnic backgrounds based on assumptions or biases. This can result in unwarranted stops, searches, arrests, and disproportionate scrutiny of certain groups, regardless of individual behavior or evidence.
2. Unfair Treatment: Stereotypes can affect how suspects, defendants, witnesses, and victims are treated throughout the criminal justice process. When decision-makers hold prejudiced views, they may unconsciously or consciously treat individuals differently, leading to unjust outcomes.
3. Bias in Charging and Sentencing: Stereotypes can impact charging decisions and sentencing recommendations. For example, a prosecutor may be more likely to pursue harsher charges against a person from a specific cultural background based on stereotypes, even if the evidence does not support it.
4. Jury Bias: Stereotypes can influence jurors' perceptions and judgments during trials, affecting the fairness of the jury's decision. Biases may affect the credibility and sympathy given to witnesses or defendants, potentially leading to biased verdicts.
5. Resource Allocation: Cultural stereotypes can also affect resource allocation within the criminal justice system. Certain communities may receive more scrutiny or resources based on stereotypes, while others may be overlooked or underserved.
6. Impact on Rehabilitation: Stereotypes can influence decisions regarding parole, probation, or diversion programs, potentially hindering the successful rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals back into society.
7. Public Perception: When cultural stereotypes influence decision-making, it can erode public trust in the criminal justice system. Communities that feel unfairly targeted or treated are less likely to cooperate with law enforcement or participate fully in the legal process.
Addressing and mitigating the influence of cultural stereotypes in criminal justice settings is crucial for ensuring fairness, equity, and justice. Training law enforcement officers, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and other stakeholders in cultural competency and unconscious bias awareness can help reduce the impact of stereotypes on decision-making. Implementing policies and procedures that promote objectivity, transparency, and accountability can also contribute to more equitable outcomes in the criminal justice system.
To know more about Cultural stereotypes:
https://brainly.com/question/31064678
#SPJ2
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
extortion of public officials is called extortion under color of official right. T/F
Answers
True. Extortion of public officials is indeed called "extortion under color of official right."
"Extortion under color of official right" refers to the act of public officials unlawfully obtaining property or money from others by exploiting their position and authority. This term is commonly used in legal contexts to describe situations where public officials abuse their power to demand bribes, kickbacks, or other forms of illicit benefits in exchange for performing their official duties or granting favors. It is a form of corruption that involves the misuse of public office for personal gain. Therefore, it is accurate to state that the extortion of public officials is referred to as "extortion under color of official right."
Learn more about extortion here:
https://brainly.com/question/15286343
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP I HAVE UNTIL 11:59 TO DO THIS LAST QUESTION!
100 WORDS PLEASE!
What if the focus of corrections were deterrence? What types of sentencing would you recommend to a person convicted of robbery? Does your sentence differ based on whether you are considering general deterrence or specific deterrence?
Answers
NIJ’s “Five Things About Deterrence” summarizes a large body of research related to deterrence of crime into five points.
Which of the following is the best reason why personality politics more frequently led to authoritarian rule in Latin America than in North America?A) generally more talented leaders in North AmericaB) lack of stable political institutions in Latin AmericaC) lack of written constitutions in Latin AmericaD) stronger ethnic divisions in Latin America
Answers
The correct option is B. lack of stable political institutions in Latin America is the best reason why personality politics more frequently led to authoritarian rule in Latin America than in North America.
Authoritarianism is a political system in which the government or ruling party exercises strict control over society and individuals, often through the use of force or coercion. In an authoritarian regime, individual freedoms and civil liberties may be restricted or eliminated altogether, with the government exerting control over all aspects of life, including media, education, and the economy.
Authoritarian governments typically suppress dissent and opposition, often using violence or imprisonment to silence critics or perceived threats. Elections may be held, but they are often manipulated to ensure the ruling party remains in power. Authoritarianism can take many forms, including military dictatorships, one-party states, and absolute monarchies.
To learn more about Authoritarian visit here:
brainly.com/question/30019371
#SPJ4
2. Explain how juvenile courts developed?
Answers
Answer:
by to many issues
Explanation:
Sage files a complaint against Isabel, alleging that Isabel is responsible for damages to Sage's property. Isabel thinks the allegations are ridiculous and doesn't bother to respond to the complaint which she has been served. Which of the following is likely true?
Answers
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.
-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.
The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
Explanation:
49. Any court in the United States that hears a case involving an issue on which the Supreme Court has ruled is required to follow the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment. This is known as:
Answers
Answer:
I don't know for sure but I think from the question its correct.
Explanation:
From my knowledge I think you are referring to the Writs of Certiorari.
Zachary and Samantha are good friends and coworkers. Every Monday morning, they spend ½ hour recounting their sexual adventures over the weekend. Stan, their coworker, does not want to hear about their sex lives and tells them so. They respond by saying, "Then close your ears. We weren't talking to you anyway." Should Zachary and Samantha continue their behavior, this could be an example of:
Answers
Zachary and Samantha are good friends and coworkers. Every Monday morning, they spend ½ hour recounting their sexual adventures over the weekend. Stan, their coworker, does not want to hear about their sex lives and tells them so. They respond by saying, "Then close your ears. We weren't talking to you anyway." Should Zachary and Samantha continue their behavior, this could be an example of: inappropriate workplace behaviour.
How to explain the informationIt is an example of inappropriate workplace behaviour because it does not reflect professionalism talking about your sexual life in workplace and public.
Also, because it is often considered as harassing and offensive and also some people might found it as a threatening behaviour which leads to bullying, aggression and physical set of violence.
Learn more about behavior on
https://brainly.com/question/1741474
#SPJ1
if u have 10 cookies then your friend takes 2 what do you have.
Answers
Answer:
Hello There!!
Explanation:
The answer is 8 because you had 10 and your friend takes 2 off from the 10.(10-2=8)
hope this helps, have a great day!!
~Pinky~
In order to get your original driver license of any type: You will be tested on what four (4) categories.
A) Vision test
B) knowledge of motor vehicles law
C) Traffic Signs
D) Driving Skills
E) All of the above
Answers
Answer:
E...
Explanation:
To get your original driver license, you will be tested on vision, motor vehicle law, traffic signs, and driving skills. The correct option is e.
You will be put through four tests in order to get your first driver's license such as vision, legal knowledge of motor vehicles, traffic signs and driving prowess. The vision test determines whether you have the required visual acuity levels for safe driving. Your knowledge of the driving laws and regulations is assessed by the knowledge test.
In order to pass the traffic signs test, you must show that you can recognize a variety of traffic signs and their meanings. Your capacity to drive safely and effectively is evaluated by the driving skills test. If you pass all of these exams, you can be sure that you're ready to get your driver's license and can drive safely.
learn more about driver license here
brainly.com/question/29441847
#SPJ2
True or False: Board of Contract Appeals and Court of Federal
Claims have jurisdiction over claims involving contracts for the
procurement of property other than real property in being.
True
False
Answers
The statement is incorrect. The Board of Contract Appeals and Court of Federal Claims generally do not have jurisdiction over claims involving contracts for the procurement of property other than real property in being.
The Board of Contract Appeals typically handles contract disputes and claims arising from government contracts, but its jurisdiction is generally limited to certain types of contracts and specific matters specified by law. The Court of Federal Claims, on the other hand, is a federal court that handles a wide range of claims against the United States government, including contract disputes. However, its jurisdiction is also subject to specific laws and regulations.
When it comes to claims involving contracts for the procurement of property other than real property in being, the specific jurisdiction and appropriate forum for resolving such claims may vary depending on the nature of the contract, the parties involved, and applicable laws or regulations.
To read more about Real Property click here
https://brainly.com/question/14402628
#SPJ11
1. the theories and perspectives in this unit focus on the environmental and social
influence of crime. do you think that environmental and social conditions influence
crime? why or why not? between biological, psychological, and social factors,
which one do you think plays the biggest role in crime? why?--
Answers
Environmental and social factors do have an impact on crime. However, the factors that have the greatest influence are psychological.
What is crime?A crime is a term to refer to a voluntary wrongful or reprehensible action that according to the law must be reprimanded and prohibited.
When a person commits a crime many factors influence him to carry out this act, some of this influence is:
Environmental: It is the environmental factor that influences a person to commit a crime, generally refers to the influence of an environment on the behavior of a person to commit a crime.Social: This factor refers to the influence of social dynamics such as: stratification, segregation, discrimination, among others, that influence the behavior of one or more individuals to commit a crime.Psychological: This factor refers to the interpretation of reality and the autonomous thoughts of the individual to commit a crime.According to the above, it can be inferred that of the factors that influence a crime, the most important is the psychological factor because it has a greater impact on the individual's thinking.
Learn more about crime in: https://brainly.com/question/15691073
Think of the ways that Nationalist sentiment has an effect on life in contemporary America. Please look beyond the easy "Trumpism" stereotypes, and instead discuss what self-proclaimed nationalists believed before he ever came along. Why is this ideology so appealing to so many people?
Answers
Answer:
nationalism is the concept of pride for your country, nationalists believe in the America first idea, and that nothing could ever top the individual liberties, policies, and freedoms of America
A federal statute requires any individual or entity owning more than 100 cars to ensure that at least 10 percent of those cars are electric-powered. A city has sued the federal official responsible for enforcing this statute in federal district court, seeking an injunction prohibiting enforcement of the statute on the ground that it is unconstitutional. Should the court grant the injunction
Answers
It is not possible to determine whether the court should grant the injunction.
The court would need to assess the constitutionality of the federal statute in question by considering relevant legal principles and constitutional provisions. One aspect that may come into play is the principle of federalism, which involves the division of powers between the federal government and the states. The court would evaluate whether the federal government has the authority to regulate car ownership and impose requirements on the percentage of electric-powered vehicles.
Additionally, the court would likely examine any constitutional challenges raised by the city, such as whether the statute infringes upon the city's rights or violates the principles of due process or equal protection. The city would need to provide compelling arguments and evidence to support its claim that the statute is unconstitutional.
Ultimately, the court's decision would be based on the interpretation of constitutional law and relevant legal precedents. It would consider the arguments presented by both parties and weigh the potential impact of granting or denying the injunction. Without further information on the specific legal arguments and evidence presented in the case, it is not possible to determine whether the court should grant the injunction.
Learn more about injunction here:
https://brainly.com/question/23850251
#SPJ11
the founders of the constitution believed that adding the bill of rights was important because
Answers
The nation's founders proclaimed a new goal for the government by adding the bill of rights: the defense of individual rights. They believed keeping the government's power in check and preserving liberty was their most essential responsibility.
What is the Bill of Rights?The first ten of the Constitution's amendments is known as the Bill of Rights. It outlines the rights of Americans regarding their government. Individuals are given freedoms and civil rights like freedom of speech, of the press, and religion.
Freedom of speech, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of religion are all guaranteed by the First Amendment. The Second Amendment guarantees the freedom to own and carry arms. The Third Amendment prohibits keeping military personnel in private residences. The Fourth Amendment protects from arbitrary search and seizure. The Bill of Rights is composed of these sections.
Learn more about the Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/6836926
#SPJ1
Question┗(•_•)―→
• What is the Act ( 1972 ) in Indian Constitution ?
Answers
Answer:
This Bill seeks to give effect to the recommendations of the Law Commission of India in its Forty-fourth and Forty-fifth Reports on Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court on certificate of fitness.
Which is a reason ethics are important to law enforcement?
Answers
Answer:
Ethics is important because law enforcement is placed in a position of authority.
Explanation:
Hunter is seventeen years old. Under the fair labor standards act, hunter cannot work.
Answers
Answer:
Hello user. I don't believe you are in college so I wont be giving you a college-worthy response. What exactly is your question? This is a statement, not a question.
Choose one of the following cases:
McCulloch v. Maryland, Gibbons v. Ogden, or District of Columbia v. Heller.
In at least two well-written paragraphs, explain why the case is important to understanding the changing nature of American federalism.
Answers
The case chosen for discussion is the Gibbons v. Ogden 1824 case, which accorded Congress the authority to regulate commerce and navigation, thereby confirming that federal law takes precedence over state laws.
What was the Gibbons v. Ogden 1824 case?The Gibbons v. Ogden case involved a dispute over shipping monopolies in New York.
When the case reached the Supreme Court, it was decided that Congress had the authority to regulate commerce and navigation according to the Constitution's Commerce Clause.
The implication is that Congress exercises authority over interstate and some intrastate commerce.
Thus, Gibbons v. Ogden expanded the federal powers over the states as a landmark decision.
Learn more about Gibbons v. Ogden at https://brainly.com/question/10443322
#SPJ1