What is precedent in law ?

Answer:

A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.

-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.

-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.

-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.

The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.

Explanation:

Answer:

A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.

Explanation:

Answer:

hhhhhkskskskskskisssss

The most important counterterrorism law ever passed by Congress is the USA PATRIOT Act.

The USA PATRIOT Act is a law that was passed by Congress in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The full name of the Act is "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001."The USA PATRIOT Act is the most important counterterrorism law ever passed by Congress. It significantly expanded the power of law enforcement agencies to investigate and prevent terrorist activities. Some of the key provisions of the Act include Authorization for law enforcement to conduct surveillance of suspected terrorists. Authorization for law enforcement to access business records and other documents. Authorization for law enforcement to use wiretaps and other electronic surveillance measures.

Authorization for law enforcement to detain and deport suspected terrorists. Immunity for law enforcement and private citizens who provide information about suspected terrorists. The USA PATRIOT Act has been controversial, with some critics arguing that it infringes on civil liberties and gives too much power to law enforcement. However, supporters of the Act argue that it is necessary to protect national security and prevent future terrorist attacks.

You can learn more about counterterrorism law at: https://brainly.com/question/509519

#SPJ11

Answer:

By having strong evidences mostly regarding his case or/and witnesses of course

Explanation:

The U.S. Supreme Court will issue a writ of certiorari. Therefore, option A is correct.

A writ of certiorari is a legal order issued by a higher court, typically an appellate court, to review the decision of a lower court. In the context of the United States Supreme Court, a writ of certiorari is an order issued by the Court to review a case that is not automatically granted appellate jurisdiction.

When a party wants the Supreme Court to review a decision from a lower court, they file a petition for a writ of certiorari, commonly known as a cert petition. The Supreme Court receives thousands of cert petitions each year but grants only a small fraction of them for review. If the Court agrees to review a case, it will issue a writ of certiorari, which directs the lower court to send up the records of the case for review.

Learn more about writ of certiorari, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11741023

#SPJ4

Answer:

They learn from their mistakes and depending on how severe the punishment is, this prevents other people from breaking the law which will essentially make the world a safer place to live in, without people being constantly in fear that something could happen to them.

Explanation:

Punishing individuals who break the law serves several purposes, including:

Deterrence: Punishment serves as a deterrent to others who may be considering breaking the law. The fear of punishment can discourage people from committing crimes.

Rehabilitation: Punishment can also serve as a means of rehabilitating offenders, helping them to understand the impact of their actions and encouraging them to change their behavior.

Retribution: Punishment can also be seen as a way of holding offenders accountable for their actions and providing a sense of justice for victims and society as a whole.

Protection: Punishment can also serve to protect society by removing dangerous offenders from the community, either through imprisonment or other forms of punishment.

Public safety: Punishing individuals who break the law can also help maintain public safety by removing individuals who pose a threat to society.

Restitution: Punishment can also include restitution, which would be a form of compensation to the victims of the crime.

It is important to note that punishment should be proportionate to the crime committed and should aim to achieve a balance between punishment, rehabilitation, and reintegration of the offender into society.

An empire could be a sovereign state consisting of many territories and peoples subject to one ruling authority, typically an emperor. The federal of the US has never stated its territories as an empire, however some commentators said it was.

hope it helps!

The probability distribution calculated from the given data satisfies both Equation 5.1 (f(x) ≥ 0) and Equation 5.2 (Σ f(x) = 1).

To satisfy Equation 5.1, we need to ensure that all values in the "Disposed" column are non-negative. In this case, all the values provided are greater than or equal to zero, so Equation 5.1 is satisfied.

Next, to satisfy Equation 5.2, we need to calculate the sum of all the values in the "Disposed" column and divide each value by the total sum:

Total Disposed cases: 43945

Probability distribution for the "Disposed" column:

Fred Cartolano: 3037 / 43945 ≈ 0.069

Thomas Crush: 3372 / 43945 ≈ 0.077

Patrick Dinkelacker: 1258 / 43945 ≈ 0.029

Timothy Hogan: 1954 / 43945 ≈ 0.044

Robert Kraft: 3138 / 43945 ≈ 0.071

William Mathews: 2264 / 43945 ≈ 0.052

William Morrissey: 3032 / 43945 ≈ 0.069

Norbert Nadel: 2959 / 43945 ≈ 0.067

Arthur Ney Jr.: 3219 / 43945 ≈ 0.073

Richard Niehaus: 3353 / 43945 ≈ 0.076

Thomas Nurre: 3000 / 43945 ≈ 0.068

John O'Connor: 2969 / 43945 ≈ 0.068

Robert Ruehlman: 3205 / 43945 ≈ 0.073

Ann Marie Tracey: 3141 / 43945 ≈ 0.071

Ralph Winkler: 3089 / 43945 ≈ 0.070

Now, if we sum up all these probabilities, we get:

\(0.069 + 0.077 + 0.029 + 0.044 + 0.071 + 0.052 + 0.069 + 0.067 + 0.073 + 0.076 + 0.068 + 0.068 + 0.073 + 0.071 + 0.070 ≈ 1\)

The sum of the probabilities is approximately 1, which satisfies Equation 5.2.

Therefore, the probability distribution calculated from the given data satisfies both Equation 5.1 (f(x) ≥ 0) and Equation 5.2 (Σ f(x) = 1).

To know more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ4

All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT businesses sell goods and services in the product market. Thus the correct option is A.

The circular flow model shows the supply of funds in society. Money is sent back to and from producers and employees in the form of wages and payments for goods.

Determining how money circulates within an industry is the central goal of the model of circular flow. It separates the economy into its two main sectors, namely, households and corporations.

The circular flow model offers one method for illuminating the relationships between various economic sectors. The interconnections between the various sectors' flows of money, products and services, production inputs, and income are represented.

Therefore, option A is appropriate.

Learn more about the circular flow model, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11324259

#SPJ2

Answer:

Explanation:

In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.

One source of funds from which life insurance policy dividends are paid is investment experience, specifically when invested premiums earn a higher return than was assumed.

When policyholders pay premiums for their life insurance policies, a portion of these funds are invested by the insurance company. These investments generate returns, which contribute to the overall financial performance of the company. If the invested premiums earn a higher return than what was originally projected or assumed by the company's actuaries, it creates a surplus of funds.

This surplus, resulting from favorable investment experience, allows the insurance company to distribute dividends to policyholders. These dividends can be paid out in the form of cash payments, reduction in premiums, or an increase in the policy's cash value. Essentially, the excess investment earnings serve as a source of funds to provide additional benefits to policyholders.

It is important to note that investment experience is just one of the factors contributing to the payment of life insurance policy dividends. Other factors, such as mortality experience (number of deaths compared to projections) and expense management, also play a role in determining the amount of dividends.

Learn more about insurance policy

brainly.com/question/7465532

#SPJ11

The federal government imposes costs on state and local governments through various means, and the courts play a significant role in shaping these dynamics.

Conditions of aid are an essential tool used by the federal government to influence state and local policies and funding allocations.

The federal government imposes costs on state and local governments through various mechanisms, with conditions of aid being a crucial tool. The courts play a significant role in shaping the relationship between the federal government and state/local entities.

One way the federal government imposes costs on state and local governments is through unfunded mandates. These mandates require state and local governments to implement federal policies or programs without providing sufficient funding, leading to a strain on their resources.

This places a financial burden on state and local governments, forcing them to allocate funds towards compliance rather than addressing their own priorities.

Additionally, the federal government can impose costs through regulatory actions. Federal agencies often promulgate regulations that state and local governments must follow, which can be costly to implement and enforce.

This can include compliance with environmental standards, workplace safety regulations, or health requirements. State and local governments must allocate resources to meet these federal standards, potentially diverting funds from other essential services or initiatives.

The courts play a vital role in determining the extent of the federal government's authority and its impact on state and local governments. The interpretation of the Constitution and federal laws by the courts can shape the balance of power between the federal government and state/local entities.

Courts may uphold or strike down federal actions, affecting the costs imposed on state and local governments. They can also influence the interpretation of conditions of aid attached to federal funding, which can impact the flexibility and autonomy of state and local governments in allocating resources.

Conditions of aid refer to requirements imposed by the federal government on state and local governments in exchange for receiving federal funds. These conditions can dictate how the funds should be used, what policies should be implemented, or what standards

Learn more about Federal agencies here :

https://brainly.com/question/30562164

#SPJ11

The concept that individuals tend to utilize the judicial process to resolve disputes is a feature of adjudication. What is Adjudication? Adjudication is the process of resolving disputes through a court hearing. Adjudication is the legal process of resolving a dispute between two or more parties, frequently through a trial or hearing. In the context of administrative hearings, adjudication refers to the formal procedure by which an administrative law judge decides an issue of law or fact after a hearing.

The parties to the litigation have the option of presenting evidence and making legal arguments before a judge, who makes a final decision on the matter. The judicial process is the process by which disputes are resolved through legal means. The judicial system is an essential component of the rule of law in any democratic society, ensuring that disputes are resolved fairly and justly.

Adjudication is an important aspect of the judicial process because it allows individuals to resolve disputes through a legal process rather than resorting to violence or other illegal means.Adjudication is a legal process of resolving disputes through a court hearing. Therefore, option C is correct.

To know more about judicial process refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30491762#

#SPJ11

Answer:

B. it is a case-by-case basis.

The Supreme Court's rulings in cases involving federalism and the relationship between the federal government and state governments can vary greatly and are not always predictable. The Court will consider the specific facts and circumstances of each case and make its ruling based on the interpretation of the Constitution and relevant laws.

Explanation:

Jessica is likely in Piaget's stage of formal operational thought, as she is able to make a well-thought-out, rational argument.

This stage occurs between ages 11 and 15, when people are able to think abstractly, make logical deductions, and consider hypothetical situations.

In this stage, people can form an opinion about something, such as the death penalty, based on their own logic and values. Jessica may oppose the death penalty on moral grounds, based on the potential for wrongful conviction or its potential lack of deterrence.

She may also have a utilitarian argument against it, as execution costs are often more expensive than life imprisonment. Whatever the argument, Jessica has the capacity to form an opinion and make a reasoned argument in Piaget's formal operational stage.

To know more about death penalty click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/25182125#

#SPJ11

To move in a circular pattern around another object.

To move in a circular pattern around another object.

The term "revolve" refers to the motion of an object or entity moving in a circular path around a central point or another object. When something revolves, it rotates or orbits around a fixed axis or point, tracing out a circular trajectory.

This circular motion can occur in various contexts, such as celestial bodies revolving around the sun, planets revolving around their own axis, or objects revolving around a central pivot or axis.

It is important to note that the concept of revolving implies a continuous circular motion rather than erratic or zig-zag movements. The object or entity follows a predictable path, forming a circle or an orbit around the central point or object.

Learn more about circular pattern

brainly.com/question/31606391

#SPJ11

In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees

A formal treaty's longevity is beneficial. Contrary to executive agreements, this could not simply be reversed and is still enforceable in court even after the next president takes office. They do, however, take time.

A treaty is a formal, written agreement that is enforceable under international law between parties. It is typically made by and between sovereign states but may also involve other legal entities, such as people, businesses, and international organizations.

Because they don't need Senate approval, the president frequently favors executive agreements. Anything that can be agreed upon by both parties with no involvement from Congress is acceptable. The benefit of this agreement type is that it is quicker. If the president refers it to the senate, it will never be approved. Additionally, it might be a speedy method for achieving political and personal objectives.

Learn more about Treaty, here

https://brainly.com/question/907952

#SPJ4

Answer:

If I were the prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and Lincoln with accessory after the fact to first degree murder. However, I would cut a deal with both Tommy and Lincoln to testify against the teacher, Darla. Although Tommy did commit and was found guilt of a murder, Tommy is only fifteen years old. He was also seduced, manipulated, and touched by his teacher. In all 50 states of the United States of America, the age of consent is 16, 17, or 18. This means that in all 50 states, Darla is also guilty of statutory r a p e, along with multiple states having even harsher punishments for adults who use their role as an educator, coesunelor, or parental guardian to se xually take advantage of a minor. As a prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and go after her as the prime target. Tommy can have his sentenced reduced. As Darla's defense attorney, the entire case against her is circumstantial and lies solely on the testimony of especially Tommy and also Lincoln. I can argue that Darla, never told Tommy to kill her husband, but that she just informed Tommy the only way they could be together forever is if her husband was out of the picture. Tommy easily could have located the firearm in her house, take the gun, and then killed her husband so that he could be with his teacher forever. The entire case lies on a jury believing a convicted murderer, or a teacher who at this point, has no criminal record that we know of.

Explanation:

The balance of power theory applies to Indo-Pak relations by emphasizing the need to prevent one side from becoming too dominant.

The application of the balance of power theory in the context of Indo-Pak relations is essential. According to the theory maintaining a stable state necessitates the equitable distribution of power among opposing forces or states. Both India and Pakistan have experienced numerous wars and tense situations over the years.

According to the theory of the balance of power, instability and hostility can result from letting one side become overly dominant. Therefore, efforts are made to promote equality of opportunity and deter conflict as well as to prevent a power imbalance.

This is demonstrated by the involvement of the international community in mediating conflicts between the two countries and in promoting communication and diplomacy. To maintain stability, peace and deterrence in Indo-Pak relations, the balanced power structure principle is upheld.

To know more about power theory here

brainly.com/question/30019719

#SPJ4

A person who has been the victim of a crime may prosecute the alleged criminal. False.

The body of law that governs crime is known as criminal law. It denotes behavior that is perceived to be threatening, harmful, or otherwise endangering to the property, health, safety, and moral well-being of others, including oneself. The vast majority of criminal law is established by statute, which means that it is enacted by a legislature. Criminal law is concerned with the punishment and rehabilitation of those who violate the law.

Criminal law varies by jurisdiction and is distinct from civil law, which focuses on dispute resolution and victim compensation rather than punishment or rehabilitation.

Learn more about Criminal law to visit this link

https://brainly.com/question/14529086

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer that would make the most sense is the license.

Explanation:

Think about licensed items, ex. A baseball cap.

The team is trademarked but the company producing merchandise of it is independent. All with the help of a license.

Answer:

what do you want ?

Explanation:

Answer:

a thorough physical examination of the reproductive tract includes a complete history, general physical examination, and evaluation of the external and internal genitalia. Ancillary tests that can be applied to this system include uterine culture, biopsy, cytology, and lavage.

The process of selling government-owned businesses to private individuals is referred to as privatization. Privatization is the process of transferring government-owned assets to the private sector, typically by selling them to private individuals or organizations that will then assume responsibility for managing them.

A few points that explain the process of privatization are mentioned below:The government entity must first decide which businesses will be privatized, as well as the objectives and goals of privatization, in order to begin the privatization process. The government is responsible for determining whether the privatization of a specific company or industry is likely to produce the desired outcome.In many instances, the government will bring in outside consultants to evaluate the businesses and make recommendations for improvement.

The government will then establish guidelines and procedures to govern the privatization process.In order to attract private buyers, the government will typically initiate a marketing campaign to promote the sale of the businesses. Interested parties may be invited to bid on the businesses, with the highest bidder typically receiving the privilege of purchasing the business.In some instances, governments might offer incentives to entice companies to participate in the privatization process. For example, governments may offer tax incentives, financing, or other forms of financial assistance to help businesses meet their privatization objectives.The privatization process is completed when the government-owned businesses are sold to private individuals or organizations. Private owners take over the management of the businesses, and the government ceases to play a role in their management or operation.

To know more about government businesses, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29894427

#SPJ11

According to traffic laws, you must place a child in an integrated child seat if the child is  option A. 3 years of age and under.

This is because children at this age have a higher risk of being injured in an accident due to their developing bodies and fragile bones. An integrated child seat is designed to provide the necessary support and protection to a child in the event of a collision. An integrated child seat is a built-in seat designed to keep the child safe and secure while traveling in a car.

It is typically installed in the rear seat of a vehicle and can be adjusted to fit the child's size and weight. It also has a harness to keep the child secure. Integrated child seats are an excellent way to ensure the safety of your child while traveling. They are required by law, and it is important to follow the guidelines and laws regarding child safety seats to ensure the safety of your child.

It is recommended that children stay in a rear-facing car seat until they are at least two years old or until they have outgrown the weight or height limits of their rear-facing car seat. Therefore the correct option is A

Know more about traffic laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/30650831

#SPJ8

Yes, the primary legal responsibility of a business is to comply with the law.

Businesses are expected to operate within the legal framework of the jurisdictions in which they operate. This means that they are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations, including those related to taxation, employment, health and safety, environmental protection, consumer protection, and more.

Failing to comply with the law can result in legal consequences, such as fines, penalties, and even criminal charges. Moreover, it can also damage the reputation of the business and lead to loss of customers, employees, and investors.

However, businesses can also have additional ethical and social responsibilities beyond legal compliance.

They can choose to engage in socially responsible practices that go beyond legal requirements to contribute to the well-being of their stakeholders, including their employees, customers, communities, and the environment.

To know more about legal responsibility here:

https://brainly.com/question/29871792

#SPJ4