what is the difference between the first and second woyane movement​

Answer:

I think abuse is bad

Explanation:

honey im not going to write an essay sry I have college to do and IM going to a bts concert sry

Mr. King and the real estate agents should have disclosed the information to Mrs. Reed. There's an ethical obligation to do so.

An ethical duty or obligation refers to a moral requirement for an individual to follow a particular course of action. Moral obligation arises out of considerations of being right or wrong.

Based on the complete information, Mr. King and the real estate agents should have disclosed the information to Mrs. Reed. It is important and ethical for real estate agents to disclose important and historical events about a particular place to the purchaser. Therefore, Mrs. Reed has to know about the area that she wants to purchase.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/25321593

Answer:

Natural Right

Explanation:

The answer is Natural right

Answer:

Natural rights

hope this helps :}

Answer:

F.

Explanation:

Answer: The number of representatives per state in the House of Representatives is determined by (c.) the population of each state.

Explanation:

The statement " civil law systems reject and prohibit the use of precedent, relying solely on strict interpretations statutes." is false as the law do not completely reject or prohibit the use of precedent

Comparatively speaking to common law systems, civil law systems rely less on precedent but do not entirely reject or forbid its use. Civil law systems are based on codified laws and statutes, and they are common in many nations around the world. Although they give the interpretation and application of the law priority, they still take precedents into consideration.

In contrast to common law systems where they establish legal principles, precedents in civil law systems are not legally binding. Instead, civil law precedents can aid judges in their decision making by persuading them or providing them with interpretive direction. Consequently even though civil law systems primarily rely on statutes, they may still take into account and make references to pertinent precedents in their legal reasoning.

Learn more about civil law systems at:

brainly.com/question/30328846

#SPJ4

When a court issues an order that may either require or forbid a party to perform a specified act, the court has issued a consideration.

An injunction is a court order requiring a person to do or end up doing a selected action. There are 3 sorts of injunctions: everlasting Injunctions, brief restraining orders, and initial injunctions. Transient Retraining Orders (TRO) and initial injunctions are equitable in nature.

Appellate jurisdiction method that the courtroom has the authority to check the selections of decreased courts. Most of the cases the ideally suited courtroom hears are appeals from decreased courts.

Learn more about court here https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

Conservatives have been critical of the Court Challenges Program because they see it as a waste of government resources and a way for special interest groups to challenge laws and policies that they don't agree with.

They argue that the program unfairly targets their values and beliefs, and that it should not receive public funding. According to conservatives, the program is used by special interest groups to fund their legal challenges, which often target conservative policies. As a result, they see it as a way for left-leaning groups to push their agendas and undermine the democratic process.

Conservatives also argue that the program is expensive, with some estimates suggesting that it costs taxpayers millions of dollars each year. They contend that this money could be better spent on more pressing issues, such as health care, education, and infrastructure.

Learn more about Conservatives

https://brainly.com/question/2261035

#SPJ11

The best way to find a case that discusses burglary multiple times within the document using Lexis is to use the search term "Burglary" multiple times with the AND operator between them, like this: "Burglary AND Burglary".

This will ensure that the search results include documents that mention the term "burglary" more than once.

Using the search term "Burglary w/p Burglary" will only find documents that have the phrase "burglary with intent to commit" in them, which may not be what you're looking for.

Using the search term "Atl5(burglary)" would search for the term "burglary" within the 5 words proximity of the term "ATL," which is not likely to be useful for this search.

Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. It could then be concluded that the best way is to use the search term "Burglary" multiple times with the AND operator between them, like this: "Burglary AND Burglary".

learn more about word search: https://brainly.com/question/26867423

#SPJ1

The pain potential points are include difficulty finding a driver, long waits at pickup locations, high fares, a desire to split fares, and unforeseen costs.

1. Premium

Riders may need the driver to wait; they expect a professional driver and a clean vehicle; they may need assistance loading luggage; if a friend joins the ride and needs to go somewhere else, they don't want any problems or queries; they may want a specified route.

Driver frustrations include waiting for passengers, having to stop frequently for unexpectedly extra passengers after meetings, and having passengers choose their own locations, which reduces driving efficiency.

2. Riders at High Frequencies (HFR)

Rider complaints include finding the driver in a crowded place, having the driver show up at the exact pickup spot rather of the anchor point, and needing a quick and convenient pick-up.

Driver frustrations include trying to locate the rider in a crowded place, arriving at the approximate pick-up position rather of the anchor spot, maneuvering traffic, not receiving any response from the rider, and having the rider leave garbage behind.

3. Travelers

Rider complaints: I don't want to have to walk down the block to get picked up; it could grow expensive over time; quick pick-up and drop-off owing to regular location.

Driver annoyances efficient pick-up and drop-off because of the traffic; extra time spent if the rider is not at the exact area as usual; suburban pick-ups; tip would be helpful; Breakfast and coffee were consumed in my car, which I then had to clean before the next pick-up.

4. Social

To know more about Riders at High Frequencies (HFR) click here

brainly.com/question/28346485

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

A promise to marry must be based upon legal consideration. Generally, one individual's promise is adequate consideration for the promise of the other party. A promise to marry must not be based solely upon illegal or immoral consideration, such as sexual relations between the parties.

i don't know if this is the answer you are looking for

The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.

Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.

To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521

#SPJ11

The legal action that Delroy and hundreds of other people joined together for is called a class action lawsuit. The last option is correct. This type of lawsuit allows a group of people to join together to bring a single lawsuit against a defendant.

Learn more about legal action: https://brainly.com/question/29423179

#SPJ11

Different colleges and universities have different ways of assigning dorm rooms. Most colleges put new students in the same dorms or buildings, but each college might do things differently.

It is necessary to consult the specific policies of the colleges in Tennessee, New York, Florida, Illinois, and Massachusetts to determine their dormitory assignment practices for freshmen in the Class of 2028.

Most colleges want freshmen to live together in specific dorms. We do this to help new students make friends, adjust to school, and feel like they fit in. Some places are only for first-year college students, like certain dorms, residence halls, or floors.

Read more about Freshmen  here:

https://brainly.com/question/23100651

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is:

"Proximate cause is established when the defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's harm, and when the harm was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct."

This statement encapsulates the two main elements of proximate cause: causation and foreseeability. Causation requires that the defendant's actions were a substantial factor in causing the harm suffered by the plaintiff, while foreseeability requires that the harm suffered by the plaintiff was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct.

Together, these elements help to establish whether the defendant's conduct was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.

The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is the "but-for" test. This test determines whether, "but for" the defendant's actions, the plaintiff's injuries would not have occurred.

The "but-for" test is a legal standard used to determine whether a defendant's actions caused the plaintiff's injuries. To satisfy the test, it must be established that, "but for" the defendant's actions, the plaintiff's injuries would not have occurred. In other words, the defendant's actions must be the direct, proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries. This is often established by proving that the plaintiff's injuries were reasonably foreseeable to the defendant at the time of their actions. This standard must be met in order for a plaintiff to successfully recover damages from a defendant. Overall, the "but-for" test is an essential standard used to determine if a defendant is responsible for a plaintiff's injuries.

Here you can learn more about  plaintiff's injuries https://brainly.com/question/27463491]

#SPJ11

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

A military personnel who leaked classified information to unauthorized person may be purnished with jail term up to ten years.

Classified Information are information owned by either the goverment or an organisation whos content are not supposed to be given out to parties outside that organisation.

At the Bottom of a typical Classified documented it is usually stated "RESTRICTED"

Learn more about Classified Information here:

https://brainly.com/question/25775920

Answer:

D: Employees through reckless behavior cause the most technology breaches.

Explanation:

This option is an incorrect response to the statement about the importance of governance of technology. While it is true that employee behavior can contribute to technology breaches, stating that employees through reckless behavior cause the most breaches is not accurate. Technology breaches can be caused by a variety of factors, including external threats, system vulnerabilities, and sophisticated cyberattacks. It is important to have governance measures in place to address these risks and ensure the secure and responsible use of technology. Therefore, this option is incorrect as it misrepresents the main reasons for the importance of governance of technology.

The welfare state grew faster in Western Europe compared to the United States due to several factors, including historical, cultural, and political differences. Western European countries had a stronger tradition of social democracy and collective welfare provision, while the United States favored a more individualistic approach and had concerns about government intervention.

The faster growth of the welfare state in Western Europe can be attributed to a combination of historical, cultural, and political factors. In Western European countries, there was a stronger historical tradition of social democracy and a belief in collective welfare provision. The aftermath of World War II and the need for reconstruction and social cohesion further fueled the expansion of welfare programs in these countries. Additionally, European societies tend to place a higher value on social solidarity and the welfare of citizens, which created a favorable environment for the growth of the welfare state.

In contrast, the United States has a different historical and cultural context. The American society has traditionally embraced a more individualistic ideology and had concerns about government intervention and the potential negative impact on personal freedom. The political landscape in the United States has also been shaped by a strong anti-communist sentiment during the Cold War, which influenced the approach to welfare policies. As a result, the growth of the welfare state in the United States has been more gradual and has often focused on targeted programs rather than comprehensive social protection.

To learn more about democracy refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30466950

#SPJ11

Answer:

Citizens should fufill the responsibility to be safe when driving, and follow street laws, or else we would have people having car crashes left and right.

Explanation:

Self explanatory

Taxpayer funds being used for political purposes is NOT a leveling mechanism.

Public education funding through tax dollars IS a leveling tool. The reduction or abolition of inequality is leveling.

A technique or mechanism meant to lessen or end social inequality is known as a leveling mechanism.

It is true to say that using public funds for political purposes is NOT a leveling mechanism, but using public funds to fix roads and bridges is an example of one. Press Space to reveal the use of public funds to support the military Press Space to reveal the exploitation of tax dollars for political purposes Press Space to reveal the usage of tax dollars to support public education.

To know more about inequality at;

brainly.com/question/1870140

#SPJ4

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:Legitimacy is when a government's constituents believe their government has the right to use power in the way it does

Explanation:

Answer:

Not only has she started drinking copious amounts of alcohol, but she's also started smoking excessively

To legally limit a Guatemalan family's right to due process of law, the court would require a compelling government interest. In order to understand this concept, let's break it down step by step:

1. Due process of law: This refers to the legal requirement that the government must respect all of a person's legal rights. It ensures that individuals are treated fairly and that they have the opportunity to defend themselves in court.

2. Guatemalan family illegally crossing the border: In this scenario, the family is entering the United States without following the proper immigration procedures. This is considered an illegal act.

3. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): ICE is the agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws in the United States. They have the authority to apprehend and detain individuals who are found to be in the country illegally.

4. Legally limiting due process: To restrict or limit a person's right to due process, there must be a compelling government interest. This means that the government must have a strong and valid reason to restrict the family's rights.

5. Compelling government interest: A compelling government interest refers to a significant and legitimate reason for the government to take action. In the context of immigration, it could include concerns about national security, public safety, or the integrity of immigration laws.

In summary, for ICE to legally limit the Guatemalan family's right to due process of law, the court would require a compelling government interest. This means that the government must have a strong and valid reason, such as national security or public safety, to restrict the family's rights.

To know more about government, visit:

brainly.com/question/4160287

#SPJ11

22 lm.aooooooooo

Your welcome

ANSWER EXPLANATION: There are two ways to solve this question. The faster way is to multiply each side of the given equation by ax−2 (so you can get rid of the fraction). When you multiply each side by ax−2, you should have:

24x2+25x−47=(−8x−3)(ax−2)−53

You should then multiply (−8x−3) and (ax−2) using FOIL.

24x2+25x−47=−8ax2−3ax+16x+6−53

Then, reduce on the right side of the equation

24x2+25x−47=−8ax2−3ax+16x−47

Since the coefficients of the x2-term have to be equal on both sides of the equation, −8a=24, or a=−3.

The other option which is longer and more tedious is to attempt to plug in all of the answer choices for a and see which answer choice makes both sides of the equation equal. Again, this is the longer option, and I do not recommend it for the actual SAT as it will waste too much time.

The final answer is B.

This statement is false "When an offeree is not aware of the insanity of the offeror and communicates assent to an offer, it is considered as accepted" because the offeror is not capable of forming a valid contract due to their mental state.

The concept used to approach this answer is the legal capacity to enter into a contract.

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties, and for a contract to be valid, all parties involved must have the legal capacity to enter into it.

This means that they must have the mental capacity to understand the terms of the contract and the consequences of entering into it.

Therefore, if an offeree is not aware of the offeror's insanity and communicates assent to an offer, it is not considered as accepted and the contract is not valid.

For more similar questions on offeror:

brainly.com/question/30362690

#SPJ11