Answers
Answer:
The key difference between a mayor-council government and a council-manager government is the way in which the executive branch of the government is structured and the level of power and authority held by the mayor and city council. In a mayor-council government, the mayor is typically the chief executive of the city and has significant power and authority. In contrast, in a council-manager government, the city council typically holds the most power and authority, and the city manager is responsible for implementing the policies and decisions of the council.
Related Questions
Erik owns a successful auditing firm. His business thus stores and manages sensitive financial information of several clients. He wants to protect such data with the help of better passwords and limit general access to sensitive database. Which of these private security personnel should Erik approach for such advice?
A. a security contractor
B. a private investigator
C. a security guard
D. a personal guard
E. a police officer
Answers
If Erik wants to protect sensitive financial information stored in his auditing firm, he should approach a security contractor for advice on implementing better passwords and limiting general access to the sensitive database. The correct option is A.
What are auditing and its importance?To ensure that all departments are using a documented system of documenting transactions, an auditor must examine or inspect multiple books of accounts in addition to physically examining inventory. It is done to check the correctness of the financial statements that the organization provides.
Security contractors are trained professionals who specialize in providing a range of security services, including security consulting, risk assessment, security design, and security technology implementation.
A private investigator typically conducts investigations and gathers information related to legal, financial, and personal matters, and may not have the specific expertise in information security and data protection that Erik requires.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about auditing firms here:
https://brainly.com/question/17138829
#SPJ3
William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.
Answers
Answer:
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.Explanation:
What are the significance of the NAPOLCOM in the operation of the PNP
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The National Police Commission abbreviated as NAPOLCOM, is an attached agency of the Department of the Interior and Local Government responsible for the administration and control of the Philippine National Police (PNP).6975 and 8551 to administer and control the Philippine National Police, the DILG “ for the purpose of effectively discharging the functions prescribe in the "To exercise administrative control and operational supervision over the PNP.
plz mark as brainliest
A(n) ________ is a person authorized by the state or county to do certain legal tasks like certifying contracts.
Answers
Question:
A(n) ________ is a person authorized by the state or county to do certain legal tasks like certifying contracts.
Answer:
Notary
What determines the number of seats in the senate? A B C or D?
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Rare earth is not soil, but a very important mineral resources. The exploitation of rare earth will bring great pollution to the ecological environment.
Excessive mining of rare earth causes ecological damage. Rare earth mining is extremely destructive to the environment and vegetation. With the massive felling of surrounding trees and the stripping of topsoil, the mountain vegetation wherever it goes will suffer irreparable damage. As the content of rare earth minerals is very low, so the exploitation of land and vegetation damage, resulting in soil erosion is very serious. If it encounters rain erosion, it is easy to cause pollution of water resources. The extraction and processing projects of rare earth cause pollution to the environment. In the process of the extraction and processing of rare earth, the discharge of harmful waste water, waste residue and waste gas is very serious, including a large amount of ammonia, nitrogen, sulfate, chloride ions and radioactive substances in the waste water. Moreover, these pollution will remain underground for a long time. These heavy metals or harmful elements will enter rivers or underground water bodies under the action of rainwater washing. Once the underground water resources are polluted, the health and ecological environment of residents will be seriously affected, and the consequences will be unimaginable.
In fact, rare earth mining is mainly a matter of environmental protection and cost, and the United States should not care so much now. Back in 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives proposed the National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2013, which aims to restore the ability of the United States to exploit strategic minerals for the sake of national security and economic recovery. Most Democrats say the bill would accelerate environmental damage, and Obama administration officials have opposed it. In 2015, the only mine in the United States, Mountain Pass in California, went bankrupt over environmental costs. In 2017, Trump signed Executive Order 13817, a Federal Strategy to Ensure the Safe and Reliable Supply of Critical Minerals, calling for a rare earth strategy. In recent years, the US has made frequent moves in the field of rare earth. The US Department of Commerce has issued 61 emergency measures aimed at promoting self-sufficiency in key mineral resources. In 2020, three congressmen successively produced the "2020 Domestic Rare Earth Bill" and "Reducing Foreign Dependence on Rare Earth". Mountain Pass also started production again in 2018, despite the green light from the United States.
Recently, Senator Cotton, a Republican, and Senator Kelly, a Democrat, submitted a rare earth bill to Congress. The bill aims to legislate for the PENTAGON to wean itself off China's reliance on rare earths within four years. To break China's monopoly on rare earth resources and wean itself off dependence on China, the United States plans to invest heavily in the rare earth industry. The US move adds to the financial burden on the US. Under the Trump administration, the US government linked the supply of rare earths to national security, joining forces with Australia and other countries to demand the exclusion of Chinese rare earth products from the defense sector. However, the labor and environmental costs of rare earth mining in western countries are so high that it is impossible for the mined minerals to be competitive in the market. Just for an imaginary threat, the PENTAGON would have to pay a hefty subsidy, further burdening America's stubbornly high fiscal deficit.
Lynas, an Australian rare-earth company backed by the United States, has also been plagued by problems. When Linus built a production facility in Malaysia in 2012, local residents protested over concerns that the separation process could create a large amount of contaminated residue that could wreak havoc on the soil and water. The Malaysian government said the permit would not be renewed if Linus failed to meet environmental monitoring targets for the waste it had already produced. Protests were held during the operation of Linus as many citizens were dissatisfied with the introduction of Linus by the government. The issue of environmental pollution in Lynas only came to the surface after Mahathir took office as prime minister and began to deal with the legacy of the previous government one by one. In 2018, the Malaysian government set up an investigation team to investigate the environment around the plant and found that underground water samples contained excessive levels of nickel and chromium.
The Biden administration has ignored the financial burden and environmental concerns of rare earth mining and processing in its effort to restart the industry to reduce dependence on China.
Answers
The central idea of this text is that although rare earth minerals are crucial to human existence, the process of mining and extracting them is taking a toll on the ecological vicinity of the earth.
What is a central idea?The central idea of a discourse is the overarching and dominant thought that reverberates all through the text.
When one is done reading a text, the thought that lingers, the impression that one is left with is what is called the central idea.
The text goes on to buttress the need for mining rare earth materials by exploring the politics behind it.
The author in connection with this mentions that Biden's administration is more concerned with economic independence and political rivalry than the real problems posed by the mining of the rare earth minerals.
Learn more about rate earth minerals at:
https://brainly.com/question/8677298
#SPJ1
What is the impeachment process and removal for federal officials according to the united states constitution?.
Answers
The constitution requires a -thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached respectable upon conviction is elimination from the workplace.
In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from protecting public offices inside the destiny. There may be no enchantment.
Article II, phase 4: The President, vice chairman, and all civil officials of the usa, shall be removed from the workplace on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or different excessive Crimes and Misdemeanors. See, e.g., Va.
The constitution offers the residence of Representatives the only energy to impeach an official, and it makes the Senate the only court for impeachment trials. The power of impeachment is confined to elimination from the workplace but also offers a means by which an eliminated officer may be disqualified from preserving future office.
Learn more about constitution here: https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
Samantha operating a business on her own. Her Taxable income is $120,000 per annum but is expected to grow quickly when planned expansion is undertaken. There are prospects of exporting goods to Asia.
Present operations involve the manufacture and sale of electric goods. About 10 people are employed and most have been with Samantha for over 10 years. Employees are paid over-award wages and are given a lavish Christmas party for themselves and their families each year. At present Samantha pays for the party out of her own funds.
Samantha bought the premises 10 years ago and while the buildings are in good shape, the grounds need attention. A new driveway and landscaping are essential, and installation of a practice and testing area would greatly boost sales. New plant and equipment are needed as much of the existing plant and equipment have been held for over 10 years. It is still in working order and, although written off for tax purposes, has a market value of about $20,000.
Samantha has two inventions which she patented a year ago and these could be quite valuable. A lot of stock which is held could be scrapped as it is holdings of outdated equipment. Samantha and her sales manager need new cars. Debtors amount to $7,500 most of which probably are not collectable.
Samantha has life insurance cover of $30,000 but does not have any superannuation. She is 52 years old and plans to retire at 60. She has a partner who has no separate income. They have four children: a daughter aged 22 attending Harvard Law School, who has no Australian source income and is likely to remain in the USA after graduation next year, a son aged 17 who is about to start an apprenticeship with the business, and twin daughters who are about to start school (which will allow Samantha’s partner to work in the business on a part-time basis).
As a Tax Agent, Samantha comes to you for advice. In particular, Samantha wants to know whether she should incorporate. Prepare a report for Samantha advising her on the implications (tax and otherwise) of incorporating her business. Samantha would like to see in the report at least the following:
(a) a table summarising the advantages and disadvantages (tax and non-tax) of incorporating;
(b) a brief discussion of particular issues, presented under separate headings. Some suggested issues to cover are (Personal income tax, Driveway and landscaping, Trading stock, Costs and deductibility of incorporation, Rate of tax, Method of payment of tax, Long service leave, Fringe benefits tax, Capital gains tax, superannuation, Issue of additional shares, Imputation)
Answers
Advantages of Incorporating:
Limited Liability: Tax Planning: Access to Capital: Perpetual Existence:Disadvantages of Incorporating:
Compliance Costs: Increased Regulation:Double Taxation:How to explain the informationAs a sole trader, your business income is taxed as personal income. As a company, the profits are taxed at the corporate level, and then again when they are distributed as dividends to shareholders.
The costs of improving the grounds of your business may be deductible as a business expense if they are considered necessary for the operation of the business. However, if they are considered capital improvements, they may need to be depreciated over time.
Learn more about incorporation on
https://brainly.com/question/29098875
#SPJ1
Question 2
Prior notice deposit means bank shall returns the deposited amount without need for notice from customer
А
True
B
False
Answers
Discuss what is true freedom in your own perspective
Answers
Answer:
1.Beyond freedom of choices, true freedom lies in producing larger goodness for the largest mankind and other creatures. When we become one with the mercy of God prevailing in universe, we truly become free from fear and sorrows.
2.Freedom” means many things to many people. Freedom can mean having the opportunity to vote for particular ideas or for people who best represent our views. Freedom can refer to the concept of freedom of speech: the ability to freely voice personal opinions or perspectives
3.the quality or state of being free: such as. a : the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action. b : liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another : independence.
Explanation:
just choose one
With the legislative changes made in 1998, a person is considered criminally responsible in England & Wales at age:
Answers
The age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales is 10 years old.
Criminal responsibility, commonly referred to as the insanity defence, focuses on the alleged offense's timing and more particularly examines whether the defendant had the mental capacity to discriminate between right and wrong at that time and could govern his or her behaviour accordingly.A police officer's duties include upholding the law and ensuring public safety. Additionally, they look into, detect, and prevent criminal activity.To know more about Criminal here
https://brainly.com/question/14567423
#SPJ4
If you have been convicted of murder in a federal district court, and you appeal your conviction to a regional Court of Appeals, you will certainly get your case overturned by the federal appellate court based on the fact that you presented new evidence before a jury in an appellate court, new evidence not heard in you trial that absolutely proves you are innocent.
a. True
b. False
Answers
Answer:
False
Explanation:
A law which sets a time limit for starting a lawsuit is called a statute of
Answers
A law that sets a time limit for starting a lawsuit is called a statute of limitations. Statutes of limitations vary depending on the type of lawsuit and the jurisdiction in which it is filed.
The purpose of a statute of limitations is to ensure that lawsuits are filed within a reasonable amount of time and to prevent individuals from being sued for actions that occurred so long ago that it would be difficult or impossible to defend against them. It is important to be aware of the statute of limitations in your jurisdiction and for your specific type of case, as failure to file within the time limit can result in the case being dismissed.
Learn more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/31093146
#SPJ11
Which document represent the borrowers promise to repay the loan
Answers
Answer:
A promissory note
Explanation:
A Promissory note written repayment agreement between a borrower and a financial lender that constitutes a promise by the borrower to pay back any sums lent to them.
Who must be properly licensed and receive general awareness/familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazmat
Answers
Answer:
All Hazmat (hazard materials) employees must be properly licensed and receive general awareness and familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazardous materials.
Explanation:
This unique training is called the "HAZMAT Familiarization and Safety in Transportation" course. The course aims to provide the following trainings: applicability and responsibility, emergency response, general awareness/familiarization, and security awareness. HAZMAT employees learn the hazard class (gas, liquid, explosive, etc.) and what each class is capable of doing. This knowledge allows the HAZMAT employee to safely transport or store hazardous materials and to correctly respond to emergencies that they could face. The training also enables HAZMAT employees to safely control and contain a HAZMAT accident, thereby protecting the general public.
amu lives with deep rooted colon cancer that is took care of by the nursing team in the ogy department of a general hospital in Addis Ababa, Black Lion Hospital. Habtamu diagnosed with colon cancer seven years ago but refused medical and surgical treatment - time. He chose to seek alternative treatment and did not follow up with the urologist hat seven year period. After several diagnostic tests over a period it was discovered that incer had metastasized to his bones, it had spread locally to his lymph nodes and the ry tumor was invading the bladder and partially obstructing the left kidney. Habtamu everal admissions over a two month period for various reasons. On the last admission was told that he may only have less than two months to live after oscopy showed further extensive growth of the tumor, it was determined that any r surgical medical intervention would not be appropriate in this case and that ative care regimen was the next step. At this point the patient reported to the health eam that he had resigned himself to the fact that he was going to die. Habtamu pulled the author's colleagues aside and confided to the nurse that he planned to kill himself at is was a secret that the nurse was not to tell anyone. Does the decision made by the t is moral or immoral? Why? If you were in the place of nurse what do you do?
Answers
The decision made by Habtamu to refuse medical and surgical treatment for his colon cancer, and instead seek alternative treatment, ultimately led to the deterioration of his condition and the belief that he only had a short time to live. The decision to seek alternative treatment may have been based on personal beliefs or mistrust of the medical system. However, this decision ultimately led to the progression of his cancer and the limited options for treatment at this stage.
The decision made by Habtamu to end his own life is a personal one and it is not for anyone to judge whether it is moral or immoral. However, as healthcare professionals, it is our duty to support and respect the patient's autonomy and their right to make decisions about their own health and well-being.
If I were in the place of the nurse, I would first try to understand the reasons behind Habtamu's decision to end his life and offer emotional support and resources for coping with his terminal illness. I would also inform the rest of the healthcare team about his decision and make sure that he receives appropriate palliative care, including pain management and emotional support. I would also consider connecting him with a counselor or a social worker to support him in his decision. Additionally, I would also make sure that the patient is aware of all the available options and the potential consequences of his decision, and provide him with the necessary information to make an informed decision.
6
What is one reason that, in modern times, it would be very difficult for Congress to overturn a president's veto?
ОА.
The Supreme Court is likely to intervene, sustaining the veto.
OB.
It's hard to get 2/3 of Congress to agree on anything.
O c.
Congress meets for too short a time to debate a veto.
OD
The Supremacy Doctrine gives the executive branch too much power.
Answers
Answer:
i think it a
Explanation:
Additional factors include: Vexatious motive. Where there is no evidence that the plaintiff had X in bringing the case specifically in a particular forum, courts usually deny the FNC motion.
A proper intent
B improper intent
C improper intention
D) proper intention
Answers
The correct answer is D) proper intention. A proper intent refers to an intent to pursue a claim in good faith and for the purpose of obtaining a valid legal remedy.
What is legal remedy?Legal remedy is a form of redress or compensation provided by the court system for a wrong or injury suffered by an individual as a result of another's actions or inaction. It is a form of legal action that seeks to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in if the wrong or injury had not occurred. Legal remedies can include monetary damages, such as compensatory damages, or non-monetary remedies, such as an injunction.
This type of intent is generally accepted by courts in determining whether a case is appropriate for a particular forum. Improper intent, on the other hand, would include an intent to harass or vex the defendant, which would be a valid basis for a FNC motion to be denied.
To learn more about legal remedy
https://brainly.com/question/28997429
#SPJ1
Whom should mrs Hightower sue for damages? Why?
Answers
Answer/Explanation:
Hightower should sue Mr. Grant because he is the father of the child who caused the mess on the floor and maid Mrs. Hightower fall.
Brown v. Board, Main points, argument, and violations. I am expecting a decent paragraph! (10 Sentence!) Majority Opinion for the brief also!
Answers
Answer:
The Supreme Court's opinion in the Brown v. Board of Education case of 1954 legally ended decades of racial segregation in America's public schools. Originally named after Oliver Brown, the first of many plaintiffs listed in the lower court case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS, the landmark decision actually resolved six separate segregation cases from four states, consolidated under the name Brown v. Board of Education. While the attorneys originally argued the cases on appeal to the Court in 1952, the featured document, School Segregation Cases - Order of Argument, offers a window into the three days in December of 1953 during which the attorneys reargued the cases.
A reargument was necessary because the Court desired briefs from both sides that would answer five questions, all having to do with the attorneys' opinions on whether or not Congress had segregation in public schools in mind when the 14th amendment was ratified. The document lists the names of each case, the states from which they came, the order in which the Court heard them, the names of the attorneys for the appellants and appellees, the total time allotted for arguments, and the dates over which the arguments took place.
The first case listed, Briggs v. Elliott, originated in Clarendon County, South Carolina, in the fall of 1950. Harry Briggs was one of twenty plaintiffs who were charging that R.W. Elliott, as president of the Clarendon County School Board, violated their right to equal protection under the fourteenth amendment by upholding the county's segregated education law. Briggs featured social science testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs from some of the nation's leading child psychologists, such as Dr. Kenneth Clark, whose famous doll study concluded that segregation negatively affected the self-esteem and psyche of African-American children. Such testimony was groundbreaking because on only one other occasion in U.S. history had a plaintiff attempted to present such evidence before the Court.
Explanation:
Most of the people in the line of presidential succession serve in which body?
The House of Representatives
The Cabinent
(gradpoint)
Answers
Answer:
The Cabinent
Explanation:
Only a couple are not in the President's Cabinet
if you could add a new amendment what would you add and why?
Answers
Answer i would add divorsing by the law bc sometimes death would happen so make where the court makes the decision to devorse.
Explanation:
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures
scott is a rude person . this tells us that his character does not include trait honesty, generosity,loyalty or politeness
Answers
Answer:
Politeness
Explanation:
If someone is rude, they are generally considered unpolite. This does not speak to their loyalty, honesty, or generosity.
If you're caught driving with _____,you could be punished with up to a year in jail and be fined upp to $1,000
Answers
Answer:
an illegal substance
Explanation:
What made Gideon different from the thousands of other criminal defendants who had
been convicted without a criminal attorney to represent them?
Answers
Answer:
Clarence Earl Gideon was a career criminal whose actions helped change the American legal system. Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. In a landmark legal decision, Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that under the U.S. Constitution, state courts are required to appoint lawyers for those individuals accused of committing a crime who cannot pay for legal representation.
Explanation:
Because of Gideon's efforts, thousands of individuals who had been tried and convicted without legal representation were granted new trials or released from Florida prisons. Over time, the right to legal representation for impoverished individuals has been extended to include juvenile offenders and adults who commit misdemeanors.
When Clarence Earl Gideon picked up a pencil to write his petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, he set a series of events in motion that changed the nation's legal system, proving that sometimes one person can make an important difference.
Gideon, different from the thousands of other criminal defendants, as his actions helped change the American legal system.
Who was Gideon?Clarence Earl Gideon was indeed a violent offender whose acts aided in the transformation of the American justice system. Gideon has been accused of robbery, but could not afford to hire an attorney to reflect him in court.
Gideon brought his case to the United States after being convicted guilty and subjected to five years in prison.
Thousands of people who had been prosecuted and sentenced without legal counsel were permitted new trials or freed from Florida prisons as a result of Gideon's work. Over time, the right of destitute people to legal counsel has been expanded to cover young offenders and adults who commit offenses.
Clarence Earl Gideon took up a pencil to begin writing his plea to the U.S. He put in motion a chain of events that reshaped the nation's judicial system, demonstrating that one individual may occasionally make a significant difference.
Therefore, it can be concluded that Gideon helped to develop the legal system.
Learn more about Gideon here:
https://brainly.com/question/20791026
#SPJ2
udhr human rights article 12
Answers
Answer:
kydktdotdktdktsktsjfsitsi5sktdktsl6slys
aggressive driving behavior, such as speeding and rapid acceleration and braking, can lower your gas mileage by up to what highway speeds.
Answers
Answer:
Aggressive driving (speeding, rapid acceleration, and braking) wastes gasoline. It can lower your gasoline mileage by 33% at highway speeds and by 5% around town. Sensible driving is also safer for you and others, so you may save more than money.
Explanation:
What is the best way to monitor alcohol consumption when guests move from the bar to the dining area?
Answers
Monitoring alcohol consumption in guest while they are moving from bar to the dining area is important to restrain them from commission of any offense and disturbing other guests.
Alcohol in any drink can bring changes in the behavior, speech, muscular coordination, and gait so people who have consumed appreciable quantity of alcohol.People who consume heavy dose of alcohol are not able to comprehend, walk, and behave normally such people can be responsible for commission of verbal and manual fight with others, criminal activities, and unwanted sexual harm to others. So, these activities of such people must be monitored. Best way to monitor alcohol consumption guests from bar to the dinning area: The attendants should stay calm. The attendants must not argue with the intoxicated guests.The attendants must try to provide a sitting area to alcohol drunk guest away from other guests in the dinning area. The attendants must ask the alcohol drunk guest about his or her requirements in food, whether he or she requires a transportation to reach home after considering his or her condition, whether he or she requires a room to stay in hotel due to abnormal condition after drinking alcohol.Learn more about alcohol:
https://brainly.com/question/16975086
requirements for the attack in private defence by means of examples
Answers
Answer:
To invoke the provisions of sec 100, I.P.C., four conditions must exist: # That the person exercising the right of private defense must be free from fault in bringing about the encounter. # There must be no safe or reasonable mode of escape by retreat; # There must have been a necessity for taking the life.
Explanation:
\(\huge{\tt{\color{cyan}{Answer}}}\)
There is a murder of the civil rights leader, who did not advocate violence. You know that there will be many riots, and many innocent people, including children and elderly, will be killed, if the murderer is not found today.
A homeless person wanders into town that day. He has no family, no friends, no job, and no connections. You know that if the homeless man is framed for the crime, and he is immediately tried and executed, you can subvert the riots, and guarantee peace in the town. . If you don't, then you know that there will be riots, and many innocent people will die. These are your only two options, and you must act today.
what would you advise that the sheriff do, and why? Is your decision consistent with the Categorical Imperative, or with Utilitarianism? Develop your answer as a defense of your choice, but also as a defense of one or the other of these moral theories.
Answers
Answer: You should frame the homeless man, It may not be pretty and it may result in the death of one, but the deaths of many will have been avoided. Its mainly a greater good type of thing.