As the House's presiding authority, the Speaker is tasked with a wide range of legal and procedural obligations.
What are the speaker's obligations and roles?The Speaker must preside over the House of Representatives and possesses all of the presiding officer's authority and responsibilities. The Speaker is required to maintain decorum and order. If there is disruptive behavior or another disturbance, the Speaker may direct that the lobby or galleries be cleared.
What should the speaker concentrate on and why?The audience should be the speaker's primary concern while they write, practice, and deliver their speech. If the speaker does her job successfully, the audience will pay attention to the topic where it belongs.
To learn more about House of Representatives here:
https://brainly.com/question/747415
#SPJ4
In the eyes of the law, why do people under age 18 lack contractual ability?Because they have insufficient resources.Because they lack intelligence.Because they're immature.Because they're minors.
In the eyes of the law, people under the age of 18 lack contractual ability because they are considered to be immature.
This means that they are not yet legally adults and therefore do not have the same rights and responsibilities as adults. The law assumes that minors are not yet mature enough to fully understand the implications of their actions, including entering into contracts. As a result, contracts entered into by minors are often considered to be voidable, meaning that they can be canceled if the minor decides to do so. This is designed to protect minors from being taken advantage of by adults who may try to enter into contracts with them.
Learn more about legal reasons why people under the age of 18 lack contractual ability here:https://brainly.com/question/30655482
#SPJ11
Are lobbyists regulated by the federal government ?
The Federal regulation of the Lobbying Act of 1946 is a statute enacted by using the US Congress to reduce the effect on lobbyists. The primary cause of the Act become to provide information to individuals of Congress approximately those who foyer them. The 1946 Act turned into changed by way of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995.
Each of the 50 states regulates lobbying, with its very own set of definitions and legal guidelines. The federal authorities have also imposed a few policies on lobbying, most currently via the sincere management and Open Government Act of 2007.
Even as lobbying is a problem to giant and often complex policies which, if no longer followed, can lead to consequences such as prison, the hobby of lobbying has been interpreted with the aid of court docket rulings as constitutionally protected loose speech and a way to petition the authorities for the redress of grievances, two of the freedoms.
Learn more about Lobbying here
https://brainly.com/question/19371103
#SPJ4
When taking photographs of small items of evidence found on a crime scene, dimensional (size) information is indicated by the use of:
When taking photographs of small items of evidence found on a crime scene, dimensional (size) information is indicated by the use of a reference scale.How to photograph small items of evidence found on a crime scene.
Photographing small items of evidence found on a crime scene requires a camera and a scale. A metric scale that is ideally colored white, black, or gray is suggested as the reference scale. This is because it is essential to distinguish between color variations and shades of gray to get more accurate results.For instance, the investigators might photograph an article of evidence in two ways. A reference scale must be in the same photo for one photo, and the scale should be removed for the second photo. The picture that includes the reference scale is referred to as the “with reference scale” photo, and the picture without the reference scale is referred to as the “without reference scale” photo.To establish the size of small items of evidence, the scale is photographed in close proximity to the object. The scale should be placed beside the object in the plane of focus and oriented in the same way. The images captured provide precise dimensional data on the evidence object.
To know more about crime , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/31439832
#SPJ11
The police obtain a warrant to search the house of a suspect for a gun based on presenting testimony to a magistrate from an informer they have strong reason to believe has a grudge against the suspect, and might even have planted the gun. If the trial court finds this out, what might they do?
Answer:
thorw the case out bc this has happed to ,me
Explanation:
The police acquire a warrant to search a suspect's home for a gun after presenting testimony to a magistrate from an informer they have reason to believe has a grudge against the suspect and may have planted the gun, to exclude the gun as evidence based on the exclusionary rule. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is evidence?
The term “evidence” refers to the proper form of proof that supports a claim. Newspaper articles, historical papers, footprints, signatures, internet sources, files, paperwork, films, medical reports, photographs, and voice recordings are a few examples of the various types of evidence.
The trial court was to determine, and did so in the instance, that the gun was clearly evidence from the person's home. It was unlawful to obtain a gun in the house, according to the rule, which was the exclusionary rule. Although there is adequate proof and the form is properly sized, there is evidence of a fabricated case.
As a result, they exclude the gun as evidence based on the exclusionary rule. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ2
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
Exclude the gun as evidence based on the exclusionary rule.Allow the use of the gun as evidence under the “inevitable discovery” rule.Allow the gun to be used as evidence, but require prosecution of the police afterwards.Describe a situation where two different people might perceive a crime scene in different ways.
Answer:
a mur*** that can be seen as a suici** some people may think it was a mur*** some think it looks like a suici**.
Should employed be allowed to monitor their employee's personal communications during non-working hours?
What happens first when a bill is introduced in the house?
Answer:
The House votes to approve or reject the bill. Than the bill goes back to the committee and they approve or make changes. It will g back and forth until the bill gets to the president. If the president accepts the bill, it becomes a law. If the president "vetoes" the bill, it goes all the way back to the starting line. All the houses are equal, and a bill may take years and still not become a law. It can take the rest of someone's life, it all just depends what the different houses think about the changes and acceptions or the bill.
Explanation:
What is the difference between Political Legitimacy and Political Efficacy
Answer:Legitimacy is when a government's constituents believe their government has the right to use power in the way it does
Explanation:
1. The "four unities" required to create a joint tenancy include which of the following conditions?
O 1. Parties must acquire respective interests at the same time.
O 2. Parties must have joint financial resources.
O 3. Parties must be legally married at the time of acquiring interest.
O 4. Parties must be family members.
Courts occasionally make reference to the four unities of time, title, interest, and possession necessary to establish a legally binding joint tenancy.
What do the four unities mean?According to the four unities principle of land law, a joint tenancy cannot exist unless there is unity of possession, unity of interest, unity of time, and unity of title among all the tenants under a lease.
What does "dual tenancy" mean in terms of time?The owners' interest is also bought concurrently. Oneness of possession: The owners are entitled to survive. Title consistency: A vesting of joint tenancy must be specified in the agreement. It is assumed that there is a tenancy in common if a vesting is not indicated.
To know more about four unities of time visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/28390083
#SPJ1
if you need 27 Pont her you go.
Answer:
e
Explanation:
3. Imagine that the doctrine of judicial review did not exist within the United States. What would be the ramifications?
The doctrine of judicial review is a fundamental principle in the United States legal system. It grants the power to the judiciary to review and potentially invalidate laws or actions that are deemed unconstitutional. If the doctrine of judicial review did not exist within the United States, there would be several ramifications:
1. Lack of a check on legislative and executive actions: Judicial review serves as a crucial check on the powers of the legislative and executive branches of government. Without it, there would be no independent body to assess the constitutionality of laws or actions. This could lead to potential abuse of power, as there would be no mechanism to ensure that the government is acting within the limits set by the Constitution.
2. Reduced protection of individual rights: One of the main purposes of judicial review is to safeguard individual rights and liberties. Without this mechanism, there would be a higher risk of laws or actions infringing upon these rights going unchecked. For example, without judicial review, laws that violate the First Amendment right to free speech or the Fourth Amendment right to protection against unreasonable searches and seizures could be implemented without recourse.
3. Limited accountability and potential for tyranny: The absence of judicial review could result in reduced accountability of the government. Laws and actions that are unconstitutional may go unchallenged, leading to potential abuses of power and infringement on civil liberties. The lack of a judicial check on government actions could pave the way for authoritarianism or tyranny.
4. Weaker separation of powers: The doctrine of judicial review is an important component of the system of checks and balances in the United States. It helps maintain the separation of powers between the three branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial. Without judicial review, the balance of power between these branches would be disrupted, potentially leading to a concentration of power in one branch.
In summary, if the doctrine of judicial review did not exist within the United States, there would be significant ramifications including a lack of checks on legislative and executive actions, reduced protection of individual rights, limited accountability, potential for tyranny, and a weaker separation of powers. The existence of judicial review is crucial in upholding the principles of constitutionalism and maintaining a balance of power within the government.
To know more about judicial, visit:
brainly.com/question/30135176
#SPJ11
what is medicare power of attorney
Answer:
A medical POA is a durable power of attorney for healthcare. ... This allows an agent (a trusted friend or family member) to make important and necessary healthcare decisions if the individual becomes incapacitated or unable to communicate or participate in care.
Answer:
A medical power of attorney or medical POA is a durable power of attorney for healthcare.
Explanation:
I hope it helps! Have a great day!
Lilac~
Question 2
Prior notice deposit means bank shall returns the deposited amount without need for notice from customer
А
True
B
False
Arthur Fairchild is accused of breaking into a top secret military installation and tampering with the records. Fairchild claims that at the time of the break-in he was with some friends smoking marijuana. Because that is against the law, his friends do not want to testify on his behalf. Will they have to?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
it is still against the law to smoke marijuana so they will have to testify anyway
which of the following country is follow presidential dimocracy system a) france b) Senegal c) USA
Answer:
The USA/United States
Explanation:
The United states of America is a presidential democracy so the answer would be C
Investments can make businesses more productive by:
O A. allowing them to ignore the limits of production possibilities
curves.
B. increasing the amount of input needed to create a certain output.
C. giving them resources to produce goods more efficiently.
D. removing most opportunity costs for making economic choices.
Answer: C. giving them resources to produce goods more efficiently.
Explanation:
I just took the quiz, C is correct! :)
Growing up in a rough neighborhood, Xavier learned to hotwire cars in order to get them started. He and his friends would look for an unlocked car, hotwire it, and go for a joyride if they were bored. He gathered knowledge on many kinds of cars. If given the opportunity, Xavier could take almost any car on the street he wanted. Into what class of criminal would Xavier MOST likely fall?
professional thief
persistent thief
shoplifter
occasional offender
The kind of Criminal that Xavier is going to be classified as going by this narrative is a persistent thief.
Who is a persistent thief?
This is a person that is known to continue stealing people's properties even though they have been successful before.
Unlike the professional thief, they do not steal in order to get paid. They continue in crime even though they may have tried to stop.
Read more on thieves here: https://brainly.com/question/26019827
is unemployment considered government assistance
Answer; yes you can say that
Explanation: its basically unemployment benefits
1. what does the immigration Law consist of?
2. How does it help people that have no papers?
3. how have the immigration laws changed over the year to help more people who are undocumented?
4.How do immigration laws differ among different states?
5.Why do immigration cases keep rising even when most countries are adopting democracy?
6.What is the relationship between immigration laws and the rate of their rise?
7.How much are the systems of taxation for the immigrants in the United States fair?
Immigration law consists of rules and regulations that govern the admission, residency, and deportation of non-citizens in the United States. It sets the criteria and processes for people who want to enter the country, work, study, or seek asylum.The relationship between immigration laws and the rate of their rise is complex, as different states may have varying degrees of enforcement and legislation. Stricter laws may deter some immigrants from entering, while lenient policies might encourage more immigration. It's important for a democracy to balance these laws with fairness and human rights considerations.The taxation system for immigrants in the United States can be considered fair in some aspects. Both documented and undocumented immigrants pay taxes through various means, such as property, sales, and income taxes. However, undocumented immigrants may not benefit from some public services they contribute to through taxation, raising questions about fairness and equity.
1. Immigration Law consists of a set of rules and regulations that govern the entry, residence, and employment of foreign nationals in the United States. The law is designed to protect American citizens and maintain the country's security while also ensuring that individuals who seek to immigrate to the United States have a fair opportunity to do so.
6. The relationship between immigration laws and the rate of their rise is complex. Some argue that strict immigration laws can discourage individuals from attempting to enter the country illegally, thereby reducing the rate of illegal immigration. However, others argue that overly harsh immigration policies can exacerbate the problem by driving undocumented immigrants further underground and making it more difficult for them to integrate into American society.
7. The systems of taxation for immigrants in the United States are generally considered fair. Undocumented immigrants are required to pay taxes just like any other worker, and many also contribute to the economy through their consumption of goods and services. However, some argue that the tax system could be made more equitable by providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, which would allow them to fully participate in American society and enjoy the same rights and privileges as other citizens. Ultimately, the question of taxation for immigrants is a complex one that requires careful consideration of the many competing interests involved.
To know more about immigration visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29998020
#SPJ11
The due process clause of the United States Constitution is specifically
stated in which amendment?
Answer:
The 5th amendment
Explanation:
The fifth amendment of the U.S. constitution states that citizens are entitled to due process
Answer:
5th Amendment!
Prompt: Can multiple people interpret the same law differently and still be correct? Provide an example.
a political science professor is researching the effects that the fifteenth and twenty-sixth amendments have had on the american political system. which of the following is the most likely reason the professor is researching these amendments?
The most likely reason the political science professor is researching the fifteenth and twenty-sixth amendments is to gain a deeper understanding of the ways in which these amendments have impacted voting rights and participation in the American political system. The fifteenth amendment, ratified in 1870, prohibited the denial of voting rights on the basis of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
The twenty-sixth amendment, ratified in 1971, lowered the voting age from 21 to 18. By examining the effects of these amendments, the professor may be seeking to better understand the evolution of the American political system and the ongoing struggle for equal representation and participation in government.
Hi! The most likely reason the political science professor is researching the 15th and 26th Amendments is to analyze their impact on voting rights and political participation in the American political system. These amendments expanded the electorate by prohibiting voter discrimination based on race (15th Amendment) and lowering the voting age to 18 (26th Amendment). By studying these amendments, the professor aims to understand how these changes have influenced political outcomes, representation, and civic engagement in the United States.
To know more about political science visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14290967
#SPJ11
A request for a change of venue is an example of a _______________motion
Answer:
venue
Explanation:
Give an example of another criminal justice practice, program, or policy in Canada that you believe to be more influenced by factors (e.g., morals, ethics, politics, economics) other than evidence. Explain your views.
Another example of criminal justice policy in Canada which I believe to be a more more influenced factor is PARTNER VIOLENCE
In Canada, there has been three different police responses to partner violence. Strict measures of punishment are usually administered because it is a domestic violence. As a matter of fact there is no specific offence of family violence in the Criminal Code, most acts of family violence are crimes in Canada. These offences are usually related to the use of physical and se-xual violenceCanada criminal justice systemIn Canada, the criminal justice system is designed to ensure public safety by protecting the society from those who violate the law. The system does and regulate this by stating the types of behaviours that are unacceptable and defining the nature and severity of the punishment for a given offence.
Learn more about the criminal justice system:
https://brainly.com/question/5111667
How has the U.S. Supreme Court defined the legal use of the death penalty?
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Do you support or oppose the death penalty? Give me couple sentences and why.
Answer:
Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.
Onyango is employed by Tropical College in Nairobi as a driver while he was transporting some of the college students to the city centre after classes; His attention was diverted when he saw some girls playing netball in a field next to the road. He lost control of the bus which then landed in a ditch and Wafula one of the students aboard was injured. Wafula seeks your advice as to whether he should sue the college or Onyango for damages for negligence. What advice would you give Wafula?
Answer:
I think he should sue Onyango for damages for negligence .....Because it was is fault the bus landed into a ditch ...The college didn't have a problem
Why would there be a need for Military, tribal and International courts?
Answer:
Well if we didn't have them we would be screwed!!
A federal system of government has
O A. free and fair elections
O B.
a written constitution
OC. socialization through education
OD. layers of government
Answer:
OD. layers of government
Explanation:
OD. layers of government
5. Which of the following multiyear contracts would require congressional notification before award? a. Multiyear contract with a cancellation ceiling of $12 million b. Multiyear contract with a cancellation ceiling of $13.5 million c. Multiyear contract with a cancellation ceiling of $20 million d. None of the above
Based on the regulations of the United States Department of Defense (DoD), multiyear contracts that have a cancellation ceiling equal to or greater than $13.5 million require congressional notification before award. (Option b.
What is Congressional Notification?In the context of U.S. federal government contracting, Congressional notification refers to the process of informing Congress about certain types of proposed contracts or other transactions before they can be awarded or executed.
This notification is typically required by law or regulation and is intended to give Congress the opportunity to review and potentially object to the proposed contract or transaction. Congressional notification is often required for contracts that exceed certain dollar thresholds or that involve certain types of goods or services.
Learn more about congressional notification here: https://brainly.com/question/22217798
#SPJ1