what is the mass of a solid sphere with radius 5.0 cm , that has 2.5 j of kinetic energy when it rotates at 34 rad / s ?

Answer:

Glycolysis

Pyruvate

Krebs Cycle

Electron Transport Chain

Explanation:

The concept map on ATP production shows the process of cellular respiration in living organisms.

Cellular respiration begins with glucose which is broken down in the process of glycolysis that occur in cytoplasm and gives 2 ATP. Glycolysis gives pyruvate as end product that enter in the process of Krebs Cycle or citric acid cycle as a aerobic process, that occur in mitochondria and produces 2 ATP. This energy is then used in Electron Transport Chain to pump high energy electrons and H+ that produces 36 ATP.

The approximate distance from the hot spot to the center of Kauai is 47,000,000 centimeters.

To find the approximate distance in centimeters from the hot spot to the center of Kauai, you'll first need to know the distance in kilometers, which is 470 km. Now, you can convert this distance to centimeters using the conversion factor 1 km = 100,000 cm.

Step 1: Write down the distance in kilometers.
Distance = 470 km

Step 2: Use the conversion factor to convert kilometers to centimeters.
1 km = 100,000 cm

Step 3: Multiply the distance in kilometers by the conversion factor.
Distance = 470 km * 100,000 cm/km

Step 4: Calculate the distance in centimeters.
Distance = 47,000,000 cm

So, the approximate distance from the hot spot to the center of Kauai is 47,000,000 centimeters.

To know more about distance here:

https://brainly.com/question/30231905

#SPJ11

Answer:

A. vitamin B

Explanation:

Answer:

It's C) color

Explanation:

--------

Explanation:

(taking g = 10 m/s^2)

F - W = m * a

500 - 310 = 31 * a

190 = 31 * a

a (Acceleration of rock ) = 6.12 m/s^2

Answer:

W= 116  Y= 163

Explanation:

This is because the cutting the mass in half would make it half of the temp of the mass 1 kg higher.

Answer: W=116 Y=163

Explanation:

We have to divide 2 by 232 and 327

232/2= 116    327/2=163

(a) The time interval for which the exam lasts, as measured by the students on spacecraft I, is 88.243 minutes.

When two observers are in relative motion, time dilation occurs due to the theory of special relativity. In this scenario, the students on spacecraft I are moving relative to an observer on Earth. To calculate the time interval measured by the students, we can use the time dilation formula:

Δt₁ = Δt₀ / γ

where Δt₁ is the time interval measured by the students, Δt₀ is the time interval measured by an observer on Earth, and γ is the Lorentz factor given by:

γ = 1 / sqrt(1 - (v/c)²)

Given that the speed of spacecraft I is 0.680c relative to Earth, we can substitute the values into the formulas. Solving for Δt₁, we find that the exam lasts 88.243 minutes as measured by the students on spacecraft I.

(b) The time interval for which the exam lasts, as measured by an observer on Earth, is 55.626 minutes.

Explanation:

When two observers are in relative motion, time dilation occurs due to the theory of special relativity. In this scenario, the professors on spacecraft II are moving relative to an observer on Earth. To calculate the time interval measured by the observer on Earth, we can use the time dilation formula:

Δt₁ = Δt₀ / γ

where Δt₁ is the time interval measured by an observer on Earth, Δt₀ is the time interval measured by the professors on spacecraft II, and γ is the Lorentz factor given by:

γ = 1 / sqrt(1 - (v/c)²)

Given that the speed of spacecraft II is 0.240c relative to Earth, we can substitute the values into the formulas. Solving for Δt₁, we find that the exam lasts 55.626 minutes as measured by an observer on Earth.

(c) If one of the professors proctored the exam by traveling on spacecraft I and stopped the exam after 54.0 minutes elapsed on her clock, the time interval for which the exam lasts, as measured by the professors on spacecraft II, can be calculated using the time dilation formula:

Δt₁ = Δt₀ / γ

where Δt₁ is the time interval measured by the professors on spacecraft II, Δt₀ is the time interval measured by the professor on spacecraft I, and γ is the Lorentz factor given by:

γ = 1 / sqrt(1 - (v/c)²)

Since the speed of spacecraft, I is 0.680c relative to Earth, we can substitute the values into the formulas. However, the time interval measured by the professor on spacecraft I is not provided, so we cannot determine the time interval measured by the professors on spacecraft II.

(d) Without knowing the time interval measured by the professor on spacecraft I, we cannot determine the time interval for which the exam lasts as measured by an observer on Earth in this scenario.

To know more about Lorentz factor, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30784090#

#SPJ4

Complete question here:

Spacecraft I, containing students taking a physics exam, approaches the Earth with a speed of 0.680c (relative to the Earth), while spacecraft II, containing professors proctoring the exam, moves at 0.240c (relative to the Earth) directly toward the students. The professors stop the exam after 54.0 min have passed on their clock.

(a) For what time interval (in minutes) does the exam last as measured by the students? 88.243 min

(b) For what time interval (in minutes) does the exam last as measured by an observer on Earth? 55.626 min What If? Suppose one of the professors proctored the exam by traveling on spacecraft I and stopped the exam after 54.0 min elapsed on her clock.

(C) For what time interval (in minutes) does the exam last as measured by the professors on spacecraft II? min

(d) For what time interval (in minutes) does the exam last as measured by an observer on Earth? min

Explanation:

The new volume of water = 25 ml

The old volume of water = 15 ml

The difference = 25 - 15 but what are the units?

Since the question asks for force, the units must start out as 10 mL

In water 1 mL has a mass of 1 gram, so the answer is 10 grams.

Grams are units of mass, not weight. You should convert this into newtons.

10 grams = 1/1000 = 0.01 kg

1 kg has a weight of 9.81 Newtons

0.01 kg has a weight 0.081 Newtons

If you have never seen a Newton before, then the answer is 10 grams

Answer:

transverse waves

Explanation:

this is because the definition of transverse waves is transverse waves are waves that travel perpendicular to the direction of the wave motion

however the definition of longitudinal waves is that longitudinal waves are waves that travel parallel to the direction of the wave motion.

so you can see the parallel means it forms compressions and rarefactions

but perpendicular means the particles will move up and down to the straight horizontal line, that's how lines are perpendicular right? ,

so the answer is transverse wave

hope this helps

please mark it brainliest

The solid sphere and the hollow sphere will have different rolling motions due to their different moments of inertia. The moment of inertia of a solid sphere is greater than that of a hollow sphere with the same mass and radius because the solid sphere has more mass distributed further from its axis of rotation.

As a result, the solid sphere will roll slower than the hollow sphere, but will have more rotational energy and be able to roll farther up the hill due to its greater inertia.

Therefore, the solid sphere will roll farther up the hill than the hollow sphere, even though they have the same mass and radius and are rolling with the same forward speed V.

To know more about rolling motions visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29568301

#SPJ11

The value of γ for the gas is approximately 1.4.

The parameter γ, also known as the adiabatic index or the heat capacity ratio, is a measure of the gas's thermodynamic properties. In the case of a quasi-static adiabatic expansion, the relationship between pressure (p) and volume (V) is given by the equation pV^γ = constant. By taking the natural logarithm of both sides of the equation, we obtain ln(p) = γ * ln(V) + constant'.

In the given data, if we plot ln(p) against ln(V), we can observe that the points approximately lie on a straight line. The slope of this line corresponds to the value of γ. Therefore, by fitting a linear regression to the data points and determining the slope, we can find that γ is approximately 1.4.

Learn more about adiabatic index (γ)

brainly.com/question/24067433

#SPJ11

If the earth had twice its present mass but orbited at the same distance from the sun as it does now, its orbital period would be 1 year.

The orbital period (additionally revolution period) is the amount of time a given astronomical object takes to complete one orbit around every other item. In astronomy, it generally applies to planets or asteroids orbiting the solar, moons orbiting planets, exoplanets orbiting other stars, or binary stars.

Kepler's third law - shows the connection between the period of an object's orbit and the average distance that it's far from the element it orbits. this could be used (in its general shape) for anything evidently orbiting around another element. system: P²=ka³ wherein: P = length of the orbit, measured in units of time.

The sidereal 12 months is the time it takes for the Earth to revolve as soon as around the sun with appreciation to the distant stars. this is about 365.2564 implied solar days, or 3.155815 x \(10^7\) seconds (s).

To learn more about the orbital period visit here:

brainly.com/question/14494804

#SPJ4

The Newton's Laws that BEST describe the situation is Newton's second law of motion.

Newton's second law of motion states, the force exerted by an object is directly proportional to the product of mass and acceleration of the object.

Also, the law can also be states as force is equal to the rate of change of momentum.

F ∝ Δp

Ft = m(v2 - v1)

The force exerted on the bicyclist by the fence is equal to the change in momentum of the bicyclist. The bicyclist was able to fly over the fence because there is a change in his momentum.

Thus, the Newton's Laws that BEST describe the situation is Newton's second law of motion.

Learn more about Newton's second law of motion here: https://brainly.com/question/3999427

#SPJ1

False; an optical and radio telescope with the same diameter will have the same angular resolution.

Using a radio receiver and an antenna system, a radio telescope may detect radio-frequency radiation from extraterrestrial sources, such as stars, galaxies, and quasars, that have wavelengths between about 10 meters (30 megahertz [MHz]) to 1 mm (300 gigahertz [GHz]). (See radio astronomy and radar.)

In 1933, Bell Telephone Laboratories engineer Karl Jansky discovered extraterrestrial radio emission while investigating the root of shortwave interference. In order to be able to direct the antenna at various points in the sky to identify the direction of the conflicting signals, Jansky put a directional radio antenna on a turntable. He identified a source of radio "noise" in addition to detecting interference from far-off thunderstorms.

Learn more about radio telescope here:

https://brainly.com/question/3964280

#SPJ4

The electric field exerted by a point charge is given by:

where q is the charge and r is the distance to the point where we want to calculate the electric field.

In this case we have three charges with the following properties:

Now, the total electric field on a point is the addition of all the charges; in this case we want the net field to be zero. Then we have:

Now, since the last equation does not have a real solution this means that this distribution of charges will not exert a zero electric field on the origin.

Therefore, there's no possible distance for the field to be zero in this charge configuration

To deduce the orbital period of a geostationary satellite at a given height, we can use the formula for the orbital period of a satellite:

T = 2π√(r³/GM),

where T is the orbital period, r is the radius of the orbit, G is the gravitational constant (approximately 6.67430 x 10^(-11) m³/(kg·s²)), and M is the mass of the Earth (approximately 5.972 x 10^24 kg).

First, we need to convert the radius of the orbit from kilometers to meters:

r = 4.2 x 10^4 km * 10^3 m/km = 4.2 x 10^7 m.

Now, we can calculate the orbital period:

T = 2π√((4.2 x 10^7)^3 / (6.67430 x 10^(-11) * 5.972 x 10^24)).

Evaluating this expression, we can find the orbital period of the geostationary satellite at that height.

Please note that the above calculation assumes a circular orbit and neglects the effects of other celestial bodies and atmospheric drag, which could slightly affect the satellite's actual orbital period.

Learn more about geostationary satellites and orbital mechanics here:

brainly.com/question/11830463

#SPJ11.

The energy lost due to friction is 82 J.

This is the energy lost by a body due to friction.

Note:  The energy lost due to friction = Potential energy-kinetic energy.

To calculate the energy lost by friction, we use the formula below.

Formula:

From the question,

Given:

Substitute the given values into equation 1

Hence, The energy lost due to friction is 82 J.

Learn more about lost energy here: https://brainly.com/question/847844

The kinetic energy for photons can not be determined while the kinetic energies for electrons, neutrons, and α particles are  3762 eV, 130 eV, and 8.08 eV respectively.

(a) For photons, the de Broglie wavelength is not related to their kinetic energy, as they do not have mass. Therefore, we cannot determine the kinetic energy of a photon using its de Broglie wavelength.

(b) To find the kinetic energy of electrons with a de Broglie wavelength of 0.14 nm, we use the formula:

E = h^2 / (2 * m_e * λ^2)
where E is the kinetic energy, h is the Planck's constant (6.626 x 10^-34 Js), m_e is the electron's mass (9.11 x 10^-31 kg), and λ is the de Broglie wavelength (0.14 nm or 1.4 x 10^-10 m).

E ≈ 6.026 x 10^-19 J or 3762 eV

(c) For neutrons with a de Broglie wavelength of 0.14 nm, we use the same formula but replace m_e with the neutron's mass (1.675 x 10^-27 kg).

E ≈ 2.088 x 10^-22 J or 130 eV

(d) For α particles (helium nuclei) with a de Broglie wavelength of 0.14 nm, we again use the same formula but replace m_e with the α particle's mass (6.646 x 10^-27 kg).

E ≈ 1.293 x 10^-21 J or 8.08 eV

In summary, the kinetic energies are:
(a) Photons: Cannot be determined
(b) Electrons: 3762 eV
(c) Neutrons: 130 eV
(d) α particles: 8.08 eV

If you need to learn more about kinetic energy click here:

https://brainly.com/question/8101588

#SPJ11

Answer:

radio TV set and telephone

A magnetic field is experienced by the charged particle in the +y direction.

Discussion:

Fleming's left-hand rule:

In accordance with Fleming's Left Hand Rule, the thumb, forefinger, and middle finger of the left hand should be positioned perpendicular to one another. The thumb should point in the path of the power exerted by the conductors, the forefinger should point in the magnetic field direction, and the middle finger should point in the path of the electric current.

Learn more about the magnetic fields here:

https://brainly.com/question/14848188

#SPJ4

Answer: yes

Explanation:

lifting an object is doing work

Every magnet consists of two poles one is the south pole other one is the north pole. All magnets have two poles. This statement is correct.

The area at either end of a magnet where the external magnetic field is strongest is known as a magnetic pole.

Every magnet consists of two poles one is the south pole other one is the north pole like poles attracts each other while unlike poles repel each other.

Hence option (a) is correct. All magnets have two poles.

To learn more about the magnetic poles refer to the link;

https://brainly.com/question/1377848

Answer:

Magnetic-field lines pass through cardboard, air, and certain other materials, depending on whether they're permeable or nonpermeable. Test different materials to see which gather magnetic lines of force and act as magnetic shields, and which allow magnetic lines of force to pass through them.

When you are dragging a heavy chair across the floor, you are applying a force on the chair in the direction of the pull. The chair is moving towards the east at a constant velocity, which means that there is no acceleration acting on the chair. The net force on the chair points towards the east because that is the direction in which you are pulling the chair.

If the net force on the chair was pointing upward and eastward at an angle between the two individual directions, it would mean that there is an additional force acting on the chair, causing it to move in a different direction.

for such more questions on force

https://brainly.com/question/12785175

#SPJ11

The equations mentioned by Emily in the valuation analysis for Aspeon are as follows:

1) Equation (1): This equation represents the value of equity (S) and calculates it based on the EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes), the tax shield provided by debt (D), and the required return on debt (kd) and equity (ks). It implies that the value of equity is equal to the adjusted EBIT after deducting the tax shield from debt.

2) Equation (2): This equation calculates the total enterprise value (V) by adding the value of equity (S) and debt (D). It represents the total worth of the company, considering both equity and debt.

3) Equation (3): This equation calculates the price per share (P) by dividing the total enterprise value (V) minus the initial debt (D0) by the number of shares (n0). It represents the price per share based on the valuation of the company.

4) Equation (4): This equation calculates the new number of shares (n1) by subtracting the dividend (D) from the initial number of shares (n0) divided by the price per share (P). It represents the adjusted number of shares after the payment of dividends.

5) Equation (5): This equation calculates the levered value (VL) by adding the unlevered value (VU) with the tax shield value (TD). It represents the value of the company after considering the tax advantages of debt.

These equations provide a framework for valuation analysis, considering factors such as earnings, taxes, debt, and equity. They help assess the value and financial implications of Aspeon's growth prospects.

To know more about  EBIT ,

https://brainly.com/question/31852554?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ11

The claim that there is at least one number that is three greater than twice its fifth power can be proven using the Intermediate Value Theorem.

To apply the Intermediate Value Theorem, we need to show that the function f(x) = \(2x^5\)+ 3 is continuous on a closed interval [a, b] and takes on both positive and negative values.

1. Continuity:

The function f(x) = \(2x^5\) + 3 is a polynomial function, and polynomial functions are continuous for all real numbers. Therefore, f(x) is continuous on the entire real number line.

2. Positive and Negative Values:

To show that f(x) takes on both positive and negative values, we can consider the limits of f(x) as x approaches positive and negative infinity:

- As x approaches positive infinity, the term \(2x^5\) dominates the function, and f(x) approaches positive infinity.

- As x approaches negative infinity, the term \(2x^5\) dominates the function, and f(x) approaches negative infinity.

Since f(x) approaches both positive and negative infinity as x approaches infinity and negative infinity respectively, it must take on all values in between, including positive and negative values.

By the Intermediate Value Theorem, since f(x) is continuous on the real number line and takes on both positive and negative values, there must exist at least one number c for which f(c) = 0. In other words, there is at least one number that is three greater than twice its fifth power.

In conclusion, by satisfying the hypotheses of the Intermediate Value Theorem, we can prove the claim that there is at least one number that is three greater than twice its fifth power.

To know more about polynomial function refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30474881#

#SPJ11